Skip to main content

Distributed and Bottom-Up Investments to Promote Innovation for Inclusive Industrialization

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
SDGs in Africa and the Middle East Region

Abstract

Democratic South Africa was successful in setting up a policy position and direction to promote innovation for inclusive industrialization. However, policy implementation has met with a fragmented economic system, slowing down the pace significantly. Essentially, the policy approach appears to assume that there is fertile ground for implementation, whereas the declining levels of innovation and deindustrialization suggest that the ground is infertile. Under this premise, the likelihood of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030 is low. Fragmentation, the dominant character of the South African economy, has historical bearings, whereby the large African majority are at the periphery of productive economic activities. Successful sustainable development would have to resolve this dominant unequal paradigm, which is not sustainable. The research develops a distributed approach to investment in innovation and industrialization, giving priority to grassroots innovation actors. The first stage of the national system of innovation (NSI), which was more top-down, offers a conceptual lens for organizing and stimulating innovation. It provides the segue to the next phase – a distributed approach and furthering the mindset of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). The approach will enhance innovation capabilities among innovation actors, thus capacitating them for the SDGs. Considering their significant contribution to the COVID-19 global economic recovery, the emphasis is on growing the proportion of manufactured medium- and high-tech products. Therefore, resources acquired through partnerships are to be allocated toward distributed investment rather than short-term outlook initiatives. The presented approach will further catalyze innovation for inclusive industrialization. The research is unique because it leverages distributed thinking in the 4IR era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Africa Union (2021) 2020 Africa Sustainable Development Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Africa Union (2022) African Union [WWW Document]. URL https://au.int/. Accessed 19 May 2022

  • Braunstein E (2019) Gender-inclusive industrialization for growth and development in the context of globalization. Gend Equal Incl Growth Econ Policies Achieve Sustain Dev

    Google Scholar 

  • Cele MBG, Luescher TM, Fadiji AW (2020) Innovation policy at the intersection – The Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC). HSRC Press, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Chataway J, Hanlin R, Kaplinsky R (2014) Inclusive innovation: an architecture for policy development. Innov Dev 4:33–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2019) Open innovation results: going beyond the hype and getting down to business. Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen CM, Ojomo E, Dillon K (2019) The prosperity paradox: how innovation can lift nations out of poverty. HarperCollins

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S (2021) Understanding the Principles of Sustainable Development | The Interfaith Center for Sustainable Development [WWW Document]. URL https://www.interfaithsustain.com/principles-of-sustainable-development/. Accessed 31 Dec 2021

  • DACST (1996) White Paper on science & technology: preparing for the 21st century. Department of Arts, Culture, Science and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G, Soete L (1988) Technical change and economic theory. Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant’Anna School of Advanced …

    Google Scholar 

  • DSI (2019) White Paper on science, technology innovation. Government Printers, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • DTIC, 2018. Industrial Policy Action Plan IPAP 2018/19–2020/21

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg J (2018) Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: a comment on transformative innovation policy. Res Policy 47:1568–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong MWL (2009) Technology leapfrogging for developing countries. In: Encyclopedia of information science and technology, 2nd edn. IGI Global, pp 3707–3713

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (1995) The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge J Econ 19:5–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C, Perez C (1988) Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. Technol Organ Innov Theor Concepts Paradig:38–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks R, Amalia M, Kintu R, Shah N (2013) Inclusive innovation: definition, conceptualisation and future research priorities. Dev Informatics Work Pap

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoosain MS, Paul BS, Ramakrishna S (2020) The impact of 4ir digital technologies and circular thinking on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability 12:10143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt V, Layton D, Prince S (2015) Diversity matters, vol 1. McKinsey Co, pp 15–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone N, Managi S, Rodríguez MC, Haščič I, Fujii H, Souchier M (2017) Environmental policy design, innovation and efficiency gains in electricity generation. Energy Econ 63:106–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamoreaux NR, Levenstein M, Sokoloff KL (2004) Financing invention during the second industrial revolution: Cleveland, Ohio, 1870–1920. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee M, Yun JJ, Pyka A, Won D, Kodama F, Schiuma G, Park H, Jeon J, Park K, Jung K, Yan MR (2018) How to respond to the Fourth Industrial Revolution or the Second Information Technology Revolution? Dynamic new combinations between technology, market, and society through open innovation. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex 4:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubin DA, Esty DC (2010) The sustainability imperative. Harv Bus Rev 88:42–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney R (2022) SMMEs are pivotal to success of SA economy [WWW Document]. URL https://www.iol.co.za/business-report/economy/smmes-are-pivotal-to-success-of-sa-economy-1c7ee28d-7874-4ce0-a09c-cf26b25c7112. Accessed 20 May 2022

  • Malerba F (1992) Learning by firms and incremental technical change. Econ J 102:845–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwala T (2020) Closing the gap: The Fourth Industrial Revolution in Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K, Paul E (1978) The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato M (2013) The entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs. private sector myths

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery DC (2009) Plus ca change: Industrial R&D in the “third industrial revolution.” Ind Corp Chang 18:1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo D (2009) Dead aid: why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • NACI, 2020. South African science, technology and innovation indicators

    Google Scholar 

  • NACI (2021) South African science, technology and innovation indicators. National Advisory Council on Innovation

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuvolari A (2004) Collective invention during the British Industrial Revolution: the case of the Cornish pumping engine. Cambridge J Econ 28:347–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panda B (2007) Top down or bottom up? A study of grassroots NGOs’ approach. J Health Manag 9:257–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi K, MacIver RM (1944) The great transformation. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Political analysis South Africa (2022) Youth unemployment rate in South Africa 2022 [WWW Document]. URL https://www.politicalanalysis.co.za/youth-unemployment-rate-in-south-africa-2022/. Accessed 22 May 2022

  • Raphasha PI (2016) Integrating national and regional innovation policy: the case of Gauteng in South Africa. University of Witwatersrand

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs JD (2012) From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. Lancet 379:2206–2211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer AI, Hughes G, Richards BS (2014) Renewable energy powered membrane technology: a leapfrog approach to rural water treatment in developing countries? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:542–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schot J, Steinmueller WE (2018) Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Res Policy 47:1554–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab K (2017) The fourth industrial revolution. Currency

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (2007) Sustainability. Dev Pract 17:589–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibanda M, Straus J (2020) The intellectual property system as a catalyst for socio-economic development for middle income countries–lessons from South Africa. Eur Intellect Prop Rev 42:738–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha S, Lutchman V (2021) Transdisciplinary education: enabling the sustainable development goals using the fourth industrial revolution. In: Sustainable development in Africa. Springer, pp 149–161

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steuart I (2019) Integrated policy report. Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • The Sustainable Development Goals Center for Africa and Sustainable Development, Solutions Network (2020) Africa SDG Index and Dashboards Report 2020. Kigali/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • TIA (2021) Technology Innovation Agency – Innovating Tomorrow Together [WWW Document]. URL https://www.tia.org.za/. Accessed 31 Dec 2021

  • TIPS (2022) TIPS – Home [WWW Document]. URL https://www.tips.org.za/. Accessed 2 Jan 2022

  • Trading Economics (2021) South Africa Unemployment Rate | 2022 Data | 2023 Forecast | 2000–2021 Historical [WWW Document]. URL https://tradingeconomics.com/south-africa/unemployment-rate. Accessed 9 Jan 2022

  • United Nations (2022a) SDG Indicators – Goal 1 [WWW Document]. URL https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/Goal-01/. Accessed 19 May 2022

  • United Nations (2022b) SDG Indicators – Goal 9 [WWW Document]. URL https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/goal-09/. Accessed 19 May 2022

  • World Intellectual Property Organization (2021) Global Innovation Index 2021: which are the most innovative countries? [WWW Document]. URL https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2021/. Accessed 31 Dec 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rendani Mamphiswana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mamphiswana, R., Sinha, S. (2024). Distributed and Bottom-Up Investments to Promote Innovation for Inclusive Industrialization. In: Abubakar, I.R., da Silva, I., Pretorius, R., Tarabieh, K. (eds) SDGs in Africa and the Middle East Region. Implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals – Regional Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17465-0_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics