Skip to main content

Toward the Betterment of Prisoners’ Lives: The Role of Social Science Research-Based Knowledge and Evidence

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Social Sciences and Global Public Health
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

Social science researchers have been studying prisoners for nearly 100 years. While most of this work has been motivated by traditional academic objectives like generating knowledge, applied research that aims to solve practical problems has become increasingly more common in recent decades. The main reason for the growth in applied research is that the numbers of people who have been imprisoned, have then reentered society after confinement, and have reoffended upon release have all exponentially increased in the United States over the past four decades, resulting in an unprecedented era of mass incarceration that has introduced innumerable struggles, harms, and pains into the lives of millions of people. The practical problems that now need to be addressed are legion, and social science research can play a central role in their resolution. Accordingly, this chapter presents synopses of academic and applied social science research with prisoners, with an emphasis on how these forms of research can be used together to inform efforts toward the improvement of prisoners’ lives. An evidence-based public health approach is ultimately endorsed, with prisoner research playing an integral role by both identifying the nature of the problems and by providing the evidence that guides their solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander J, Robbins M (2010) Functional family therapy. A phase-based and multi-component approach to change. In: Murrihy R, Kidman A, Ollendick T (eds) Clinical handbook of assessing and treating conduct problems in youth. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Alper M, Durose M (2018) Update on prisoner recidivism: a 9 year follow-up period. United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • American Public Health Association (n.d.) What is public health? https://www.apha.org/What-is-Public-Health. Accessed 16 July 2022

  • Andrews DA, Bonta J (2010) The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews D, Bonta J, Hoge R (1990) Classification for effective rehabilitation: rediscovering psychology. Crim Justice Behav 17(1):19–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austria R, Peterson J (2017) Credible messenger mentoring for justice-involved youth. The Pinkerton Papers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Balthazar A (ed) (2017) Project MK-ultra and mind control technology: a compilation of patents and reports. Adventures Unlimited Press, Kempton

    Google Scholar 

  • Blue E (2009) The strange career of Leo Stanley: remaking manhood and medicine at San Quentin State Penitentiary, 1913–1951. Pac Hist Rev 7(8):210–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonta J, Andrews D (2007) Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation 6(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgon G (2013) The demands on probation officers in the evolution of evidence-based practice: the forgotten foot soldier of community corrections. Fed Probat 77(2):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgon G, Bonta J (2014) Reconsidering the responsivity principle: a way to move forward. Fed Probat 78(2):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J (1991) The professional ex-: an alternative for exiting the deviant career. Sociol Q 32(2):219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownson R, Fielding J, Maylahn C (2009) Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health 30(1):175–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron W (1963) Informal sociology: a casual introduction to sociological thinking. Random house, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson E (2020) Prisoners in 2018. NCJ # 253516. United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler R, Fletcher B, Volkow N (2009) Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: improving public health and safety. JAMA 301(2):183–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clear T (2009) Imprisoning communities: how mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clear T (2010) Policy and evidence: the challenge to the American Society of Criminology: 2009 presidential address to the American Society of Criminology. Criminology 48(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemmer D (1940) The prison community. Christopher, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham W (2021) The social causes of health and disease, 3rd edn. The Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Colvin M (1982) The 1980 New Mexico prison riot. Soc Probl 29(5):449–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort N (2009) The prisoner as model organism: malaria research at Stateville Penitentiary. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 40(3):190–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen F, Gendreau P (2001) From nothing works to what works: changing professional ideology in the 21st century. Prison J 81(3):312–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datchi C (2019) Functional family therapy with couples behind bars. In: Pitta P, Datchi C (eds) Integrative couple and family therapies: treatment models for complex clinical issues. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson R (1974) Chicano prisoners: the key to san Quentin. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis L, Bozick R, Steele J et al (2013) Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional education: a meta-analysis of programs that provide education to incarcerated adults. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge M, Pogrebin M (2001) Collateral costs of imprisonment for women: complications of reintegration. Prison J 81(1):42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowden C, Andrews D (2004) The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: a meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 48(2):203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enos S (2001) Mothering from the inside: parenting in a women’s prison. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeley M, Simon J (1992) The new penology: notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology 30(4):449–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman J (1934) Sex in prison: revealing sex conditions in American prisons. National Library Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong R (1990) The organizational structure of prison gangs: a Texas case study. Fed Probat 54(1):36–43

    Google Scholar 

  • George E (2010) A woman doing life: notes from a prison for women. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Giallombardo R (1966) Society of women: a study of a women’s prison. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney C (2003) Mental health issues in long-term solitary and “supermax” confinement. Crime Delinq 49(1):124–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett D, Carr A, Hamilton E et al (2016) The effectiveness of functional family therapy for adolescent behavioral substance misuse problems: a meta-analysis. Fam Process 56(3):607–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes T, Wilson D (2020) Reentry trends in the United States: inmates returning to the community after serving time in prison. United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin J (1970) The felon. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin J (1985) The jail: managing the underclass in American society. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin J (2009) Lifers: seeking redemption in prison. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1977) Stateville: the penitentiary in mass society. University of Chicago Press, Chicogo

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R (2002) Hard time: understanding and reforming the prison, 2nd edn. Wadsworth, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaeble D, Glaze L, Tsoutis A et al (2016) Correctional populations in the United States, 2016. United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckow R, Zhen Z (2022) Correctional populations in the United States, 2020 – statistical tables. United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupers T (1996) Trauma and its sequelae in male prisoners: effects of confinement, overcrowding, and diminished services. Am J Orthopsychiatry 66(2):189–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kupers T (2005) Toxic masculinity as a barrier to mental health treatment in prison. J Clin Psychol 61(6):713–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupers T (2017) Solitary: the inside story of supermax isolation and how we can abolish it. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kupers T, Toch H (1999) Prison madness: the mental health crisis behind bars and what we must do about it. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahelma E (2001) Health and social stratification. In: Cockerham W (ed) The Blackwell companion to medical sociology. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Latessa E, Lowenkamp C (2005) What works in reducing recidivism? Univ St Thomas Law J 3(3):521–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Lempert L (2016) Women doing life. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Link B, Phelan J (1995) Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J Health Soc Behav 35:80–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood D (1980) Prison sexual violence. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie D (2001) Corrections and sentencing in the 21st century: evidence-based corrections and sentencing. Prison J 81(3):299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinson R (1974) What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest 35:22–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna S (2001) Making good: how ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna S (2015) Qualitative research, theory development, and evidence-based corrections: can success stories be “evidence”? In: Miller J, Palacios W (eds) Qualitative research in criminology. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna S, LeBel T (2012) The desistance paradigm in correctional practice: from programmes to lives. In: McNeill F, Raynor P, Trotter C (eds) Offender supervision: new directions in theory, research and practice. Willan Publishing, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauer M (2011) Addressing racial disparities in incarceration. Prison J 91(3):87S–101S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore J (1977) A case study of collaboration: the Chicano pinto research project. J Soc Issues 33(4):144–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morenoff J, Harding D (2014) Incarceration, prisoner reentry, and communities. Annu Rev Sociol 40:411–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen B (1998) In the mix: struggle and survival in a women's prison. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Pager D (2003) The mark of a criminal record. Am J Sociol 108:937–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer T (1975) Martinson revisited. J Res Crime Delinq 12(2):133–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin L, Schieman S, Fazio E et al (2005) Stress, health, and the life course: some conceptual perspectives. J Health Soc Behav 46(2):205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia J (2009) When prisoners come home: parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast M (2011) Issues in defining and applying evidence-based practices criteria for treatment of criminal-justice involved clients. J Psychoactive Drugs 43(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter K (2016) 23/7: Pelican Bay prison and the rise of long-term solitary confinement. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards S, Ross J (2001) Introducing the new school of convict criminology. Soc Justice 28(1):177–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Rideau W, Wikberg R (eds) (1992) Life sentences: rage and survival behind bars. Times Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen D, Schoenbach V, Wohl D (2008) All-cause and cause-specific mortality among men released from state prison, 1980–2005. Am J Public Health 98(12):2278–2284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson R, Laub J (1995) Crime in the making: pathways and turning points through life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Scacco A (1975) Rape in prison. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrag C (1954) Leadership among prison inmates. Am Sociol Rev 19:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarbek D (2014) The social order of the underworld: how prison gangs govern the American penal system. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skeem J, Manchak S, Peterson J (2011) Correctional policy for offenders with mental illness: creating a new paradigm for recidivism reduction. Law Hum Behav 35(2):110–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell T (1994) Women in prison. United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton J (2011) An ethnographic account of doing survey research in prison: descriptions, reflections, and suggestions from the field. Qual Sociol Rev 7(2):45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton J (2019) Doing reflectively engaged, face-to-face research in prisons: contexts and sensitivities. In: Liamputtong P (ed) Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes G (1958) The society of captives: a study of a maximum security prison. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes G, Messinger S (1960) The inmate social system. In: Cloward R, Cressey D, Grosser G et al (eds) Theoretical studies in the social organization of the prison. Social Science Research Council, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry C (2003) The fellas: overcoming prison and addiction. Wadsworth, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • The Sentencing Project (2019) Trends in U.S. corrections. The Sentencing Project, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Toch H (1975) Men in crisis: human breakdowns in prison. Aldine, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Toch H (1977) Living in prison: the ecology of survival. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Toch H (2001) The future of supermax confinement. Prison J 81(3):376–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis J (2002) Invisible punishment: an instrument of social exclusion. In: Mauer M, Chesney-Lind M (eds) Invisible punishment: the collateral consequences of mass imprisonment. New Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubah C (2004) Abolition of Pell grants for higher education of prisoners: examining antecedents and consequences. J Offender Rehabil 39(2):73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ubah C, Robinson R Jr (2003) A grounded look at the debate over prison-based education: optimistic theory versus pessimistic worldview. Prison J 83(2):115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Justice (1995) Correctional populations in the United States. NCJ-13849. United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Justice (n.d.) Prisoners and prisoner reentry. https://www.justice.gov/archive/fbci/progmenu_reentry.html. Accessed 16 July 2022

  • Walmsley R (2018) World prison population list. Institute for Crime & Justice Policy Research, Birkbeck, University of London. www.prisonstudies.org. Accessed 16 July 2022

  • Ward D, Kassenbaum G (1965) Women’s prison: sex and social structure. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Western B (2018) Homeward: life in the year after prison. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White W (2000) The history of recovered people as wounded healers: II. The era of professionalization and specialization. Alcohol Treat Q 18(2):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams E (2011) Corrections and evidence based practices: what does it mean? https://www.corrections1.com/jail-management/articles/corrections-and-evidence-based-practices-what-does-it-mean-FrCkoZR8NI00hLYp/. Accessed 16 July 2022

  • Wodahl E, Garland B, Culhane S et al (2011) Utilizing behavioral interventions to improve supervision outcomes in community-based corrections. Crim Justice Behav 38(4):386–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young J (1986) The failure of criminology: the need for a radical realism. In: Matthews R, Young J (eds) Confronting crime. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhen Z (2020) Jail inmates in 2018. NCJ # 253044. United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Sutton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sutton, J.E. (2023). Toward the Betterment of Prisoners’ Lives: The Role of Social Science Research-Based Knowledge and Evidence. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Social Sciences and Global Public Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96778-9_118-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96778-9_118-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96778-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96778-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics