Abstract
This entry defines the sublime and presents its historical context, focusing on its conceptual and philosophical aspects. The sublime denotes an intense, charged emotion with high arousal and containing a mixed valence (negative-positive). A sublime experience is an aesthetic experience of uplift and elevation in response to a powerful or vast object that is otherwise typically experienced as menacing or overwhelming. The experience is overall positive and pleasing, for participants typically desire the experience to continue. Second, this entry surveys several themes disputed in the literature: the sublime’s relation to beauty, fear, and awe, why it is pleasing, and its being self-referential or reflexive. Third, the entry summarizes recent empirical research on the topic. The sublime has received relatively little scientific attention, only beginning in the past decade. A prominent empirical approach to the sublime conceptualizes it as having a fear component, although some recent studies have begun to question this. Finally, the entry concludes with a reflection on the sublime and the possible.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bethelmy, L., & Corraliza, J. (2019). Transcendence and sublime experience in nature: Awe and inspiring energy. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 509.
Brady, E. (2013). The sublime in modern philosophy: Aesthetics, ethics, and nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brady, E. (2019). The environmental sublime. In R. R. Clewis (Ed.), The sublime reader. London: Bloomsbury. (pp. 355–64).
Burke, E. (2019). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. In R. R. Clewis (Ed.), The sublime reader (pp. 79–89). London: Bloomsbury.
Clewis, R. R. (Ed.). (2019a). The sublime reader. London: Bloomsbury.
Clewis, R. R. (2019b). Towards a theory of the sublime and aesthetic awe. In R. R. Clewis (Ed.), The sublime reader (pp. 340–353). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Costelloe, T. M. (2012). The sublime: From antiquity to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dennis, J. (2019). The grounds of criticism in poetry. In R. R. Clewis (Ed.), The sublime reader (pp. 63–67). London: Bloomsbury.
Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2012). Stirring images: Fear, not happiness or arousal, makes art more sublime. Emotion, 12, 1071–1074.
Gendler, T. S., & Hawthorne, J. (2002). Conceivability and possibility. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gordon, A. M., Stellar, J. E., Anderson, C. L., McNeil, G. D., Lowe, D., & Keltner, D. (2017). The dark side of the sublime: Distinguishing a threat-based variant of awe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 310–328.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2019). Symbolism of the sublime. In R. R. Clewis (Ed.), The sublime reader (pp. 200–211). London: Bloomsbury.
Hepburn, R. W. (1996). Landscape and metaphysical imagination. Environmental Values, 5, 191–204.
Hur, Y.-J., Gerger, G., Leder, H., & McManus, I. C. (2018). Facing the sublime: Physiological correlates of the relationship between fear and the sublime. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(2), 152–167.
Ishizu, T., & Semir, Z. (2014). A neurobiological enquiry into the origins of our experience of the sublime and beautiful. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–10, article 891.
Kant, I. (2019). Analytic of the sublime. In R. R. Clewis (Ed.), The sublime reader (pp. 123–146). London: Bloomsbury.
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 17(2), 297–314.
Kirwan, J. (2005). Sublimity: The non-rational and the irrational in the history of aesthetics. London: Routledge.
Konečni, V. (2005). The aesthetic trinity: Awe, being moved, thrills. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 5, 27–44.
Konečni, V. (2011). Aesthetic trinity theory and the sublime. Philosophy Today, 55(1), 64–73.
Kung, P. (2010). Imagining as a guide to possibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81(3), 621–663.
Longinus. (2019). On the sublime. In R. R. Clewis (Ed.), The sublime reader (pp. 17–30). London: Bloomsbury.
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2017). The distancing-embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 2–58.
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Schindler, I., Hanich, J., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2019). What are aesthetic emotions? Psychological Review, 126(2), 171–195.
Ortlieb, S. A., Fischer, U. C., & Carbon, C. C. (2016). Enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful: Is there a male gaze in empirical aesthetics? Art & Perception, 4, 205–224.
Pelowski, M., Hur, Y., Cotter, K., Ishizu, T., Christensen, A., Leder, H., & McManus, C. (2019). Quantifying the if, the what, and the when of the sublime: A survey and network model of incidence, emotions, triggers, and distinct varieties within reports of personal sublime experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Online first.
Petrarch. (2019). The ascent of Mount Ventoux. In R. R. Clewis (Ed.), The sublime reader (pp. 49–54). London: Bloomsbury.
Porter, J. I. (2015). The sublime in antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Razavi, P., et al. (2016). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in the experience of awe. Emotion, 16, 1097–1101.
Schopenhauer, A. (2019). World as will and representation. In R. R. Clewis (Ed.), The sublime reader (pp. 194–198). London: Bloomsbury.
Shaw, P. (2017). The sublime (p. 2017). London: Routledge.
Sundararajan, L. (2002). Religious awe: Potential contributions of negative theology to psychology, ‘positive’ or otherwise. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 22(2), 174–197.
Van Elk, M., Karinen, A., Specker, E., Stamkou, E., & Baas, M. (2016). ‘Standing in Awe’: The effects of awe on body perception and the relation with absorption. Collabra, 2, 1–16.
Wordsworth, W. (2019). The sublime and the beautiful. In R. R. Clewis (Ed.), The sublime reader (pp. 177–183). London: Bloomsbury.
Yablo, S. (1993). Is conceivability a guide to possibility? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53(1), 1–42.
Zangwill, N. “Aesthetic Judgment”, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/aesthetic-judgment/.
Zickfeld, J. H., Schubert, T. W., Seibt, B., Blomster, J. K., Arriaga, P., Basabe, N., ... & Fiske, A. P. (2019). Kama muta: Conceptualizing and measuring the experience often labelled being moved across 19 nations and 15 languages. Emotion, 19(3), 402–424.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Clewis, R.R. (2022). Sublime. In: Glăveanu, V.P. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90913-0_114
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90913-0_114
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90912-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90913-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences