Abstract
Labeled by the UN as a holistic “plan of action for people, planet and prosperity,” the Agenda 2030 embraces 17 ambitious Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) pertaining, inter alia, to poverty eradication, climate change, health, education and peace, and strong institutions. Notwithstanding the progress the global community had reached toward the Goals by 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic caused an unprecedented disruption to the SDGs’ implementation. Against this background, this contribution presents a tertiary analysis of the SDGs and their implementation in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic’s implications, paying particular attention to challenges the pandemic has provoked in the domains of democratic governance and international cooperation (especially in light of Goal 16 “Peace, justice and strong institutions”). It is demonstrated that the COVID-19-induced challenges have to a considerable extent reinforced the trends, previously attributed in literature to the contestation(s) of international liberal order. Among such trends, scholars distinguish autocratization, deglobalization, the rise of nationalism and populism, and the geopoliticization of international relations. Reinforced by the pandemic, these trends definitely threaten to undermine the means of SDGs’ implementation (e.g., global trade, finance, and capacity-building) and the Global Partnership for Sustainable Development. It shall be, however, emphasized that the collective experience of countering the COVID-19 pandemic may still foster global cooperation via raising leaders’ awareness about the severity of global challenges and demanding new solutions in the environmental and health domains.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, K. W., & Bernstein, S. (2015). The high-level political forum on sustainable development: Orchestration by default and design. Global Policy, 6(3), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12199
Aiginger, K. (2020). Populism: Root causes, power grabbing and counter strategy. Intereconomics, 55, 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-020-0867-3
Alcaro, R. (2018). The liberal order and its contestations. A conceptual framework. The International Spectator, 53(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2018.1397878
Arteaga, F. (2020, April 7). The coronavirus as a yardstick of global health policy. Real Instituto ELCANO. Retrieved from http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/portal/rielcano_en/contenido?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/elcano/elcano_in/zonas_in/ari38-2020-arteaga-the-coronavirus-as-yardstick-of-global-health-policy
Avis, W. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and response on violent extremist recruitment and radicalisation (K4D Helpdesk Report 808). Institute of Development Studies. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/15322
Bieber, F. (2018). Is nationalism on the rise? Assessing global trends. Ethnopolitics, 17(5), 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2018.1532633
Bieber, F. (2020, April 27). Global nationalism in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nationalities-papers/article/global-nationalism-in-times-of-the-covid-pandemic/3A7F44AFDD6AC117AE05160F95738ED4
Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: The novel approach of the UN sustainable development goals. Elsevier, 26–27, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010
Bollyky, T. J., & Bown, Ch. P. (2020). The tragedy of vaccine nationalism. Only cooperation can end the pandemic. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-07-27/vaccine-nationalism-pandemic
Börzel, T., & Zürn, M. (2021). Contestations of the liberal international order: From liberal multilateralism to postnational liberalism. In International organization (Vol. 75, pp. 1–24). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000570
Bouckaert, G. (2020). What the coronavirus and the sustainable development goals (SDGs) have in common: An administrative science perspective. In P. Joyce, F. Maron, & P. S. Reddy (Eds.), Good public governance in global pandemic (pp. 5–27). The International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS).
Brown, G., & Susskind, D. (2020). International cooperation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(1), S64–S76. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa025
Brubaker, R. (2020, November 3). Paradoxes of populism during the pandemic. SAGE Journals. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513620970804
Carant, J. B. (2017). Unheard voices: A critical discourse analysis of the millennium development goals’ evolution into the sustainable development goals. Third World Quarterly, 38(1), 16–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1166944
Cassani, A. (2022). Covid-19 and the Democracy-autocracy freedom divide: Reflections on post-pandemic regime change scenarios. Political Studies Review, 20(4), 717–724.
C-change. (n.d.). Coronavirus, climate change, and the environment. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Retrieved from https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/c-change/subtopics/coronavirus-and-climate-change/
Chan, S., & Amling, W. (2019). Does orchestration in the global climate action agenda effectively prioritize and mobilize transnational climate adaptation action? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19, 429–446. https://springerlink.bibliotecabuap.elogim.com/article/10.1007/s10784-019-09444-9
Deák, A., & Weiner, C. (2022). Hungary: More business, less illiberalism. In M. Kaeding, J. Pollak, & P. Schmidt (Eds.), Russia and the future of Europe (pp. 51–54). Routledge.
Debre, M. J., & Dijkstra, H. (2020, October). Covid-19 and policy responses by international organizations: Crisis of liberal international order or window of opportunity? Researchgate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hylke-Dijkstra/publication/342735986_Covid-19_and_policy_responses_by_international_organizations_Crisis_of_liberal_international_order_or_window_of_opportunity/links/5f88444e458515b7cf8238f3/Covid-19-and-policy-responses-by-international-organizations-Crisis-of-liberal-international-order-or-window-of-opportunity.pdf
Drinóczi, T., & Bień-Kacała, A. (2019). Illiberal constitutionalism: The case of Hungary and Poland. German Law Journal, 20(8), 1140–1166. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.83
Du Pisani, J. A. (2006). Sustainable development – Historical roots of the concept. Environmental Sciences, 3(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430600688831
Easterly, W. (2009). How the millennium development goals are unfair to Africa. Elsevier, 37(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.02.009
Eck, K., & Hatz, S. (2020). State surveillance and the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Human Rights, 19(5), 603–612. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14754835.2020.1816163
Evenett, S. (2021, February 11). Export controls on COVID-19 vaccines: Has the EU opened Pandora’s Box? VOXEU. Retrieved from https://voxeu.org/content/export-controls-covid-19-vaccines-has-eu-opened-pandora-s-box
Freedom House. (2021). Freedom in the World. Research methodology. Freedom House. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-world/freedom-world-research-methodology
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2006). Millennium development goal 8: Indicators for international human rights obligations? JSTOR, 28(4), 966–997. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20072774
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2010, January 13). Reducing inequality – The missing MDG: A content review of PRSPs and bilateral donor policy statements. IDS Bulletin. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00100.x
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2016). From the millennium development goals to the sustainable development goals: Shifts in purpose, concept, and politics of global goal setting for development. Gender and Development, 24(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2016.1145895
Gavas, M., & Pleeck, P. (2021, March 2). Global trends in 2021: How COVID-19 is transforming international development. Centre for Global Development. Retrieved from https://www.cgdev.org/publication/global-trends-2021-how-covid-transforming-international-development
Georgieva, K. (2020, September 29). No lost generation: Can poor countries avoid the Covid trap? The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/sep/29/covid-pandemic-imf-kristalina-georgieva
Global Alliance. (2019, July). Enabling the implementation of the 2030 Agenda through SGD 16+. SGD 16 Hub. Retrieved from https://www.sdg16hub.org/system/files/2019-07/Global%20Alliance%2C%20SDG%2016%2B%20Global%20Report.pdf
Gottenhuber, S., & Mulholland, E. (2020). Implementing the sustainable development goals in times of rising right-wing populism in Europe. Sustainability, 12. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208465
Guasti, P. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in central and Eastern Europe. The rise of autocracy and democratic resilience. Berghahn Journals. Democratic Theory, 7(2), 47–60. https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/democratic-theory/7/2/dt070207.xml
Hafner, M., Yerushalmi, E., & Fays, С. (2020). COVID-19 and the cost of vaccine nationalism. RAND Corporation. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA769-1
Herrera, L. (2020). Spain: Telework as a public innovation strategy. In P. Joyce, F. Maron, & P. S. Reddy (Eds.), Good public governance in global pandemic (pp. 89–93). The International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS).
Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7–23. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241
Ikenberry, G. J. (2020). The next Liberal order. The age of contagion demands more internationalism, not less. Foreign Affairs, 99. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/fora99&div=106&id=&page=
ILO. (2020, May). A policy framework for tackling the economic and social impact of the COVID-19 crisis. Policy Brief. International Labor Organization. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/documents/briefingnote/wcms_745337.pdf
International Idea. (2015, May 13). Policy brief. Democratic accountability in service delivery within the Post-2015 development agenda Stockholm: International IDEA. Retrieved from https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/democratic-accountability-service-delivery-post-2015-development-agenda
International Idea. (2019). The sustainable development goals and the global state of democracy indices. The Global State of Democracy in Focus, 5, 1–10. https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/sustainable-development-goals-and-gsod-indices.pdf
Irwin, D. (2020, May 5). The pandemic adds momentum to the deglobalisation trend. VOXEU. Retrieved from https://voxeu.org/article/pandemic-adds-momentum-deglobalisation-trend
James, H. (2017) Deglobalization as a global challenge. CIGI Papers No 135. Retrieved from: https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/documents/Paper%20no.135WEB_1.pdf
Karásková, I. (2021, 25 March). Injecting influence: China’s vaccine diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe. MERICS. Retrieved from https://merics.org/en/opinion/injecting-influence-chinas-vaccine-diplomacy-central-and-eastern-europe
Katsambekis, G., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2020, June). Populism and the pandemic. A collaborative report. Populismus. Retrieved from http://populismus.gr/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/interventions-7-populism-pandemic-UPLOAD.pdf
Kauzya, J. M. (2020). Reflections on the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the implementation of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development and SDGs. In P. Joyce, F. Maron, & P. S. Reddy (Eds.), Good public governance in global pandemic (pp. 27–35). The International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS).
Kelly, S. (2020, September 10). The Covid crisis – fuel to the fire of populism. Aberdeen Standard Investments. Retrieved from https://www.aberdeenstandard.com/en/insights-thinking-aloud/article-page/the-covid-crisis-fuel-to-the-fire-of-populism
Keyzer, M., & Wesenbeeck, L. V. (2006). The millennium development goals, how realistic are they? De Economist, 154, 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-006-9019-9
Kim, R. E. (2016). The nexus between international law and the sustainable development goals. Reciel, 25(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12148. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/reel.12148?casa_token=hBs9x1oNIBcAAAAA%3AtuDXQdAd4xhi8lxQC0ZQRGQ1yZT4h0hW1FUzRTqwDm-y8tw4q4JRMRwM22kMEP-UtxOQmrtwOcGGBmDU
Kleinfeld, R. (2020, March 31). Do authoritarian or democratic countries handle pandemics better? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/03/31/do-authoritarian-or-democratic-countries-handle-pandemics-better-pub-81404
Kroll, C., & Zipperer, V. (2020). Sustainable development and populism. Ecological Economics, 176, 106723. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106723
Kroll, C., Warchold, A., & Pradhan, P. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies? Palgrave Communication, 5. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0335-5
Lakner, C., Yonzan, N., Mahler, D. G., Aguilar, R. A. C., & Wu, H. (2021, January 11). Updated estimates of the impact of COVID-19 on global poverty: Looking back at 2020 and the outlook for 2021. World Bank Blogs. Retrieved from https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/updated-estimates-impact-covid-19-global-poverty-looking-back-2020-and-outlook-2021
Liu, J., Hull, V., Godfray, H. C. J., et al. (2018). Nexus approaches to global sustainable development. Nature Sustainability, 1, 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0135-8
Livermann, D. M. (2018). Development goals and geography: An update and response. Dialogues in Human Geography, 8(2), 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820618780793
Lührmann, A., & Lindberg, S. I. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it? Democratization, 26(7), 1095. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029
Lührmann, A., Mechkova, V., Dahlum, S., et al. (2018, June 18). State of the world 2017: Autocratization and exclusion? Democratization, 25(8), 1321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1479693
Maerz, S. F., Lührmann, A., Hellmeier, S., et al. (2020). State of the world 2019: Autocratization surges – Resistance grows. Democratization, 27(6), 909–927. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1758670
Marone, F. (2021). Hate in the time of coronavirus: Exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on violent extremism and terrorism in the west. Security Journal. https://springerlink.bibliotecabuap.elogim.com/article/10.1057/s41284-020-00274-y, 35, 205.
McCrudden, C. (2020). Democracy, protests, and COVID-19: the challenge of (and for) human rights. UK Constitutional Law Association. Retrieved from: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2020/06/19/christopher-mccrudden-democracy-protests-and-covid-19-the-challenge-of-and-for-human-rights
McKeown, T. (1991). A liberal trade order? The long-run pattern of imports to the advanced capitalist States. JSTOR International Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600468
Merkel, W. (2004). Embedded and defective democracies. Democratization, 11(5), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340412331304598
Müller, J. W. (2016). What is populism? University of Pennsylvania Press.
Nhamo, G., Chikodzi, D., Kunene, H. P., & Mashula, N. (2021). COVID-19 vaccines and treatments nationalism: Challenges for low-income countries and the attainment of the SDGs. An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 16(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1860249
Nossem, E. (2020). The pandemic of nationalism and the nationalism of pandemics. UniGR-CBS Working Paper Vol. 8. CBS. Uni. Retrieved from https://ubt.opus.hbz-nrw.de/opus45-ubtr/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/1405/file/UniGR-CBS-Working+Paper+Vol.+8.pdf
OECD. (2019). Recommendation on Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development. OECD.org. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/pcsd/oecd-recommendation-on-policy-coherence-for-sustainable-development.htm
Oxfam. (2021, January). The inequality virus. Bringing together a world torn apart by coronavirus through a fair, just and sustainable economy. Retrieved from https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/621149/bp-the-inequality-virus-250121-en.pdf
Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2016). Transnational multistakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Conditions for success. Ambio, 45, 42–51. https://springerlink.bibliotecabuap.elogim.com/article/10.1007/s13280-015-0684-2
Perrier, T. (2020, December 1). A few reasons why the Covid crisis may lead to less deglobalisation than thought. Amundi Research. Retrieved from https://research-center.amundi.com/page/Article/2020/12/A-few-reasons-why-the-Covid-crisis-may-lead-to-less-deglobalisation-than-thought?search=true
Quintana, F., & Uriburu, J. (2020). Modest international law: COVID-19, international legal responses, and depoliticization. American Journal of International Law, 114(4), 687–697.
Rabinovych, M. (2020). The legal status and effects of the agenda 2030 within the EU legal order. JCER, 16(2), 182. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v16i2.1071
RCEP. (2020). Summary of the regional comprehensive economic partnership agreement. RCEP. Retrieved from https://rcepsec.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Summary-of-the-RCEP-Agreement.pdf
Rodrik, D. (2018). Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy, 2018. https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/populism_and_the_economics_of_globalization.pdf
Rossi, R., Socci, V., Talevi, D., et al. (2020). Pandemic and lockdown measures impact on mental health among the general population in Italy. Brief research report article. Frontiers in Psychiatry. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00790, 11.
Rume, T., & Islam, S. M. D. (2020). Environmental effects of COVID-19 pandemic and potential strategies of sustainability. Heliyon, 6(9), e04965. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04965
Sachs, J. D. (2012). From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. The Lancet, 379(9832), 2206–2211. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/a/article/PIIS0140-6736(12)60685-0/fulltext
Sachs, J., et al. (2020). The sustainable development goals and COVID-19. Sustainable development report 2020. Cambridge University Press. https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustainabledevelopment.report/2020/2020_sustainable_development_report.pdf
Sachs, J., et al. (2022). Sustainable development report 2022. From crisis to sustainable development: The SDGs as roadmap to 2030 and beyond. Cambridge University Press. https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustainabledevelopment.report/2022/2022-sustainable-development-report.pdf
Sahin, S. Z. (2020). Turkey’s COVID-19 pandemic response from a practitioners perspective. In P. Joyce, F. Maron, & P. S. Reddy (Eds.), Good public governance in global pandemic (pp. 105–109). The International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS).
Saith, A. (2007). Goals set for the poor, goalposts set by the rich. Universiteit Leiden. IIAS Newsletter, 45, 12–13. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12811
Schomaker, R., Kappler, M., & Bauer, M. W. (2020). Citizens’ trust in public administration in times of crisis – Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic – Administrative behaviour in times of crisis. In P. Joyce, F. Maron, & P. S. Reddy (Eds.), Good public governance in global pandemic (pp. 45–57). The International Institute of Administrative Sciences (IIAS).
Seghezzo, L. (2009). The five dimensions of sustainability. Environmental Politics, 18(4), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903063669
Servaes, J. (2017). Introduction: From MDGs to SDGs. In J. Servaes (Ed.), Sustainable development goals in the Asian context (pp. 1–21). Springer. https://springerlink.bibliotecabuap.elogim.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-2815-1_1
Sidlo, K (2020, April 23). China, Russia, and geopolitical games in pandemic-stricken MENA region. CASE. Retrieved from https://www.case-research.eu/index/?id=5ff900f343db67ad24f5fc56af63070c
Struckmann, C. (2018). A postcolonial feminist critique of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: A south African application. Agenda. Empowering Women for Gender Equity, 32(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2018.1433362
Thange, I., et al. (2020). How Russia, China and other governments use coronavirus disinformation to reshape geopolitics. Infodemic Monitor. Retrieved from https://thebulletin.org/2020/10/how-russia-china-and-other-governments-use-coronavirus-disinformation-to-reshape-geopolitics/
UN. (2015a). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution A/RES/70/1. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
UN. (2015b). The Millennium Development Goals Report. New York. Un.org. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2015_MDG_Report/pdf/MDG%202015%20rev%20(July%201).pdf
UN. (2015c). Addis Ababa action agenda. United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/2051AAAA_Outcome.pdf
UN. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. New York. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2020.pdf
UN. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021. New York. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2021.pdf
UN. (2022). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022. New York. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2022.pdf
UN. (n.d.-a). Decade of action. UN.org. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/decade-of-action/
UN. (n.d.-b). Goal 8: Develop a global partnership for development. UN.org. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/global.shtml
UN System Staff College (n.d) Portfolio. Retrieved from https://www.unssc.org/sites/default/files/kcsd_course_overview.pdf
UNICEF. (2020, September). Education and COVID-19. UNICEF data. Retrieved from https://data.unicef.org/topic/education/covid-19/
Usman, Z. (2021, February 24). Vaccine geopolitics could derail Africa’s post-pandemic recovery. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/02/24/vaccine-geopolitics-could-derail-africa-s-post-pandemic-recovery-pub-83928
Varga, M., & Buzogány, A. (2021). The foreign policy of populists in power: Contesting liberalism in Poland and Hungary. Geopolitics, 26(2), 1442–1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1734564
von Bogdandy, A., & Villarreal, P. (2021). The role of international law in vaccinating against COVID-19: Appraising the COVAX initiative. Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 81, 89–116.
Waage, J., Banerji, R., Campbell, O., et al. (2010). The millennium development goals: A cross-sectoral analysis and principles for goal setting after 2015. The Lancet Commission, 376(9745), 991–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61196-8
WCED, (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: note by the Secretary General. Retrieved from: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/139811
Weber, H. (2017). Politics of ‘leaving no one behind’: Contesting the 2030 sustainable development goals agenda. Globalizations, 14(3), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1275404
Werther-Pietsch, U. (2018). Measuring the impact of SDGs on international law - a nucleus of a right to peace? Austrian Journal of Political Science, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.1895.vol47iss1
WTO. (2020, December 11). Report shows marked decline in trade restrictions by WTO members amidst COVID-19 pandemic. WTO. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news20_e/trdev_11dec20_e.htm
Youngs, R., & Panchulidze, E. (2020). Global Democracy & Covid-19: Upgrading international support. IDEA. Retrieved from https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/global-democracy-and-covid-19.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Rabinovych, M. (2023). The Present and Future of Sustainable Development Goals amid the Transforming Global Order and Social Change. A Decade of Action. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87624-1_8-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87624-1_8-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87624-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87624-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences