Abstract
There are too many unknowns around the explosive growth of cyber-physical technology applications that it needs a hard conversation around ethics of the unknown. Different studies predict growth from digital transformation around 20–50% over the next decade. The situation becomes alarming as decision-making shifts from humans to machines that can learn to act autonomously, without fear of penalty. It is unreasonable for us to expect such machines to be “ethically neutral.” Gartner notes that 85% of all AI will be biased in 2022 [1]. The technology development community needs guidance and controls. All the ethical considerations that have evolved through the third revolution are still valid. So, the additional ethical principles for handling this next revolution should build on existing ethics framework in use, within the organization and longstanding norms, and values in the nondestructive evaluation (NDE) sector.
The topic is likely to be a long-drawn out debate, with continuously evolving perspectives from successful technology disruptors with equally plausible opposing perspectives. The objective of this chapter is to present multiple perspectives, raise a few questions, and discuss a few possibilities, with an intent to kick off a hard discussion around ethics in NDE 4.0 so that over the next few years the professional community can develop guidance on how to identify and address ethical situations of the cyber-physical ecosystem. To keep the scope of this chapter to a manageable length we will not rehash what has been well published around traditional NDE business ethics, such as employees, ecology, consumers, marketing, or business models, which are well addressed by NDT societies.
We urge every user of the Handbook in pursuit of digital transformation to read this chapter, because in some sense it is our ethical duty and professional responsibility to proactively identify and remove the potential for harm from advancing the technology frontier.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Reinhart RJ. Most Americans already using Artificial Intelligence Products. Gallup, March 6, 2018. https://news.gallup.com/poll/228497/americans-already-using-artificial-intelligence-products.aspx
Artificial intelligence, algorithmic pricing, and collusion; Emilio Calvano, Giacomo Calzolari, Vincenzo Denicolò, and Sergio Pastorello; 03 February 2019 https://voxeu.org/article/artificial-intelligence-algorithmic-pricing-and-collusion
WhatsApp. The Best Facebook Purchase Ever? Investopedia, By Alison L. Deutsch. Updated 18 Mar 2020.
The ethics of algorithms: key problems and solutions, Andreas Tsamados, Nikita Aggarwal, Josh Cowls, Jessica Morley, Huw Roberts, Mariarosaria Taddeo, and Luciano Floridi, AI & Society Jan 2021.
Power Business with AI: Augmented Intelligence, CEO white paper, Mark J. Barrenechea, OpenText. https://www.opentext.com/info/augmented-intelligence-ceo-white-paper
https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/28/study-of-youtube-comments-finds-evidence-of-radicalization-effect/, Natasha Lomas, Jan 28, 2020.
Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G
Dealing with Bias in Artificial Intelligence, By Craig S. Smith. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/19/technology/artificial-intelligence-bias.html, Jan 2, 2020
What HBR Gets Wrong About Algorithms and Bias, 07 Aug 2018 by Rachel Thomas. https://www.fast.ai/2018/08/07/hbr-bias-algorithms/
NDT 4.0 – Overall Significance and Implications to NDT, Rainer. Link, Nathanael. Riess; August 2018. https://www.ndt.net/article/ecndt2018/papers/ecndt-0619-2018.pdf
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/ethics/#:~:text=The%20field%20of%20ethics%20(or,of%20right%20and%20wrong%20behavior.
Personal communication with Ramon Fernandez
What’s the right thing to do. https://justiceharvard.org/ and the lecture playlist. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL30C13C91CFFEFEA6
https://www.i-cio.com/management/insight/item/a-new-ethic-for-technology. Defining a new ethic for technology, Rae Ritchie – May 2019
What is trust in technology? Conceptual bases, common pitfalls and the contribution of trust research, Dr. Frens Kroeger. https://www.trusttech.cam.ac.uk/perspectives/technology-humanity-society-democracy/what-trust-technology-conceptual-bases-common
These are the 4 Biggest Innovation Challenges We Must Solve Over the Next Decade – Ultimately, it’s about humans rather than technology, BY GREG SATELL, INC. Aug 25, 2018.
Japan Cabinet Office, since 2016. https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/society5_0/index.html
Industry 4.0: Ethical and Moral Predicaments, by Weiyu Wang and Keng Siau, Vol 32, No 6, Cutter Business Technology Journal pp36–45, 2019.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics: Ethics of AI and Ethical AI, Weiyu Wang and Keng Siau, Journal of Database Management, Volume 31(2) 2020, pp74–86
https://www.bindt.org/membership/for-companies/code-of-ethics/
https://ndtss.org.sg/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/NDTSS-code-of-ethics.pdf
Ethics for the Information Age, Seventh Edition; Michael Quinn: ePub; Pearson; Online publication date February 2016.
“Guidelines and Ethical Standards” for Data Scientists. https://www.adasci.org/ethics-in-data-science/
Data science code of professional conduct, Data Science Association. https://www.datascienceassn.org/code-of-conduct.html
PCN certification gained by giving fake experience. https://www.ndt.net/forum/thread.php?rootID=59770
Prison for NDT Inspector, https://www.ndt.net/forum/thread.php?msgID=38977
https://github.com/fastai/fastbook/blob/master/03_ethics.ipynb, Data Ethics
Robitzski D. A new algorithm trains AI to erase its Biases. Futurism. January 29, 2019. https://futurism.com/algorithm-trains-ai-to-erase-biases.
Coming to Terms: The Kaleidoscope of Privacy and Surveillance, In B. Roessler and D. Mokrosinska, The Social Dimensions of Privacy. Cambridge University Press, 2015. By Gary T. Marx, Professor Emeritus, MIT https://web.mit.edu/gtmarx/www/thekaleidoscopeof.html
AI Ethics II: Why we need quality control; Falk Henemann; DMEXCO; 23 January 19; https://dmexco.com/stories/ai-ethics-ii-why-we-need-quality-control/
16 Things You Can Do to Make Tech More Ethical; Rachel Thomas; fast.ai; 22 Apr 2019; https://www.fast.ai/2019/04/22/ethics-action-1/
Siau K, Wang W. Building Trust in Artificial Intelligence, machine learning, and robotics. Cutter Bus Technol J. 2018;31(2):47–53.
https://www.scu.edu/ethics/all-about-ethics/artificial-intelligence-and-ethics-sixteen-challenges-and-opportunities/. Artificial Intelligence and Ethics: Sixteen Challenges and Opportunities, Brian Patrick Green
The Partnership on AI to Benefit People and Society, Inaugural Meeting, Berlin, Germany, October 23–24, 2017
Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Apr 30, 2020 https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-ai/
AI HLEG, 2019, “High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence: Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI”, European Commission, accessed: 9 April 2019
European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, 2018, “Statement on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and ‘Autonomous’ Systems”, 9 March 2018, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Unit RTD.01.
DoD Adopts Ethical Principles for Artificial Intelligence; US DoD; Feb 24, 2020
Floridi L, Cowls J, Beltrametti M, Chatila R, Chazerand P, Dignum V, Luetge C, Madelin R, Pagallo U, Rossi F, Schafer B, Valcke P, Vayena E. AI4People – an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Mind Mach. 2018;28(4):689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.
Taylor S, et al. 2018. Responsible AI – key themes, concerns & recommendations for European research and innovation: summary of consultation with multidisciplinary experts. June.
Whittlestone J, Nyrup R, Alexandrova A, Dihal K, Cave S. Ethical and societal implications of algorithms, data, and artificial intelligence: a roadmap for research. Cambridge: Nuffield Foundation, University of Cambridge; 2019.
Lessons learned from AI ethics principles for future actions, Opinion paper, Merve Hickok, AI and Ethics (2021) 1:41–47
DoD Adopts Ethical Principles for Artificial Intelligence; US DoD; Feb 24, 2020. https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/Release/Article/2091996
Why data review boards are a promising tool for improving institutional decision-making; Fred Cate; Rachel Dockery; Stanley Crosley; Privacy Perspectives, The International Association of Privacy Professionals; 28 February 20; https://iapp.org/news/a/why-data-review-boards-are-a-promising-tool-for-improving-institutional-decision-making/
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge valuable conversations on the topic with Ramon Fernandez (Mexico), David Gilbert (UK), Don Andrews (Canada), Vaibhav Garg (India), Norbert Meyendorf and Johannes Vrana (Germany), Kim Hayes, Francesca (Matthew) Litschewski, Nathan Ida, and Don Locke (all from USA). These are contributors of intellectual content and deserve to be acknowledged.
Disclaimer Authors are engineers and not philosophers and submit that this chapter is just another piece of research to feed the ongoing hard conversation on ethics intended to raise concerns as we collectively progress towards NDE 4.0. It is not to be treated as a guidance or code of ethics for NDE 4.0.
Some portion of the content may soon become obsolete, as the collective understanding of the community around ethics changes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Singh, R., Clifford, T. (2022). Ethics in NDE 4.0: Perspectives and Possibilities. In: Meyendorf, N., Ida, N., Singh, R., Vrana, J. (eds) Handbook of Nondestructive Evaluation 4.0. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73206-6_61
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73206-6_61
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73205-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73206-6
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics