Abstract
Communities of practice and local transition experiences have been developed in recent decades. However, it has had a relatively marginal role of an experimental and fragmentary type. There are indeed networks (transition network and GEN), but their relationship is still outsiders vis-à-vis the established society and formal governance. On the other hand, these communities, as social entrepreneurship, have a relatively high “mortality rate,” making hard scale-up governance analyses and proposals. The current pandemic moment may or may not be a turning point in this situation, being one of the motivations of this chapter. Another motivation is the set of concepts that have emerged from criticism and overcoming the paradigm of sustainability: post-sustainability and regenerative cultures. Starting from these concepts and a triangular logic between university, governance, and communities of practices, we seek to learn from those who have already learned, through learning case studies for sustained social transformation. The research that the chapter embodies has an interdisciplinary basis and a direct partnership with actors with experience in using Sociocracy 3.0 (S3) as a social tool, enabling place-based learning. The main objective of this chapter is to discuss the possibilities of scale-up of S3, presenting a set of good practices in the application of this tool in Portugal. The chapter begins by discussing central concepts related to social transformation and transition: post-sustainability; regenerative cultures; S3; scale-up governance; and transformational learning cases. The following is a genealogy of sociocracy from the classic concept to practices as a system of self-organization. Built on collaborative citizen science research, we relate individual life story with the genealogy of social innovation, stating the relevance of the individual on these transition processes. In a collaborative way, the first typology of S3 in Portugal was done, and specifically, eight case studies are then presented, seeking to characterize elements of regeneration and scale-up governance. The contribution of this chapter is to place these communities of practice as true partners for social entrepreneurship of regeneration, creating possibilities for scale-up in a strong articulation with local governments for a better transition management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abegão JLR (2019) Where the wild things were is where humans are now: an overview. Hum Ecol 47:669–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-00099-3
Bennett EM, Solan M, Biggs R et al (2016) Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene. Front Ecol Environ 14:441–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1309
Blühdorn I (2016) Sustainability— post-sustainability— unsustainability. In: Gabrielson T, Hall C, Meyer JM, Schlosberg D (eds) The Oxford handbook of environmental political theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bockelbrink B, Priest J, David L (2021) A practical guide for evolving agile and resilient organizations with Sociocracy 3.0. S3
Brundtland GH (1987) Our common future—call for action. Environ Conserv 14:291–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900016805
Buck J, Villines S (2007) We the people: consenting to a deeper democracy. Sociocracy.info Press, Washington, DC
Cortegano M, Dias RC, Vidal DG, Seixas PC (2021) ‘Mértola, a lab for the future’ as a transformational plan for the mediterranean semi-arid region: a learning case based on landsenses ecology. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1920059
Crowley D, Marat-Mendes T, Falanga R et al (2021) Towards a necessary regenerative urban planning. Insights from community-led initiatives for ecocity transformation. Cidades:83–104. https://doi.org/10.15847/CCT.20505
Crutzen P, Stoermer E (2000) The ‘Anthropocene’. Glob Chang Newsl 41:17–18
Czeisler MÉ, Lane RI, Petrosky E et al (2020) Mental health, substance use, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic — United States, June 24–30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69:1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1
Dewey J (1980) Art as experience. Perigee Books, New York
Eisenmenger N, Pichler M, Krenmayr N et al (2020) The Sustainable Development Goals prioritize economic growth over sustainable resource use: a critical reflection on the SDGs from a socio-ecological perspective. Sustain Sci 15:1101–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00813-x
Ellet W (2007) The case-study handbook. How to read, discuss and write persuasively about cases. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Endenburg G, Bowden C (1988) Sociocracia: a organização da tomada de decisão: “sem objeção” como princípio da sociocracia. Stichting Sociocratisch Centrum, Rotterdam
Foster J (2018) Post-sustainability: tragedy and transformation. Routledge, London
Girardet H (2010) Regenerative cities. World Future Council, Hamburg
Girardet H (2014) Creating regenerative cities. Routledge, London
Gorissen L, Spira F, Meynaerts E et al (2018) Moving towards systemic change? Investigating acceleration dynamics of urban sustainability transitions in the Belgian City of Genk. J Clean Prod 173:171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.052
GTDF (2021) Gesturing towards decolonial futures. www.decolonialfutures.net. Accessed 12 Aug 2021
Halkos G, Gkampoura EC (2021) Where do we stand on the 17 Sustainable Development Goals? an overview on progress. Econ Anal Policy 70:94–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.02.001
Hodgson J, Hopkins R (2010) Transition in action: totnes and district 2030: an energy descent action plan. Green Books, London, UK
Hopkins R (2014) The transition handbook: from oil dependency to local resilience. Green Books, Cambridge
Hopkins R (2019) From what is to what if: unleashing the power of imagination to create the future we want. Chelsea Green Publishing, London
Horton R (2014) Offline: why the sustainable development goals will fail. Lancet 383:2196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61046-1
Lam DPM, Martín-López B, Wiek A et al (2020) Scaling the impact of sustainability initiatives: a typology of amplification processes. Urban Transform 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-020-00007-9
Lambin EF, Kim H, Leape J, Lee K (2020) Scaling up solutions for a sustainability transition. One Earth 3:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.06.010
Loorbach D (2010) Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23:161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
Mang P, Reed B (2013) Regenerative development and design. In: Loftness V, Haase D (eds) Sustainable built environments. Springer, New York, pp 478–501
Markard J, Raven R, Truffer B (2012) Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Res Policy 41:955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) Limits to growth. Potomac Associates, Universe Books, Virginia
Nature Editorial Office (2020) Time to revise the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature 583:331–332. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02002-3
Nóvoa A, Finger M (1988) O Método (Auto)Biográfico e a Formação. DRH Ministério da Saúde, Lisboa
OECD (2020) Global outlook on financing for sustainable development 2021: a new way to invest for people and planet. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
Poirier J, Clapier-Valadon S, Raybaut P (1983) Les Recits de Vie. Theorie et Pratique. PUF, Paris
Redclift M (1984) Sustainable development: exploring the contradictions. Routledge, London
Redclift MR, Guerra L (2002) Pós-sustentabilidade e os novos discursos de sustentabilidade. Raízes Rev Ciências Sociais e Econômicas 21:124–136. https://doi.org/10.37370/raizes.2002.v21.186
Reed B (2007) Forum: shifting from “sustainability” to regeneration. Build Res Inf 35:674–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701475753
Santos BS (2010) Para além do pensamento abissal: das linhas globais a uma ecologia dos saberes [Beyond abyssal thinking: from global lines to an ecology of knowledge]. In: Santos BS, Meneses MP (eds) Epistemol do Sul. Cortez, São Paulo, Brazil, pp 31–83
Sconfienza UM (2019) The post-sustainability trilemma. J Environ Policy Plan 21:769–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1673156
Seixas, PC (1997) O Método Biográfico na Formação de Professores: Uma abordagem crítica. In Laurinda Leite et al. (orgs.) Didácticas e Metodologias da Educação, Departamento de Metodologia da Educação, Universidade do Minho, pp 909–919, Braga
Seixas PC (2021) The transformational wave. The feedforward century. In: Seixas PC, Lobner N (eds) The transformational wave: beyond Covid-19. Amazon Books, Seattle
Seixas PC, Dias RC (2016) “Narrativas de Futuro” como “Resiliência Percebida” e as “Duas Culturas”. Implicações para a “Governança da Resiliência” do Antropoceno. Rev Científica Monfragüe Resiliente 7:121–136
Seixas PC, Lobner N (2018) Transformational communities: a programmatic ambivalence as a learning path for the cognitive planet. J Sustain Dev 11:152. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v11n6p152
Seixas PC, Dias RC, Pereira P (2017) Uma cidade boa para viver: planejamento cultural e ciência cidadã no desenvolvimento urbano sustentável. A obra nasce Rev Arquit da Univ Fernando Pessoa 12:9–25
United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, A/RES/70/1. Geneva
Van den Bosch S, Rotmans J (2008) Deepening, broadening and scaling up: a framework for steering transition experiments. Knowledge Centre for Sustainable System Innovations and Transitions (KCT), Rotterdam
Wahl D (2016) Designing regenerative cultures. Triarchy Press, Dorset
WWF (2020) Living planet report 2020 – bending the curve of biodiversity loss. WWF, Gland
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Piteira, X., Vidal, D.G., Dias, R.C., Seixas, P.C. (2022). Post-Sustainability, Regenerative Cultures, and Governance Scale-Up: Transformational Learning Cases of Sociocracy 3.0 in Portugal. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Doni, F., Salvia, A.L. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_135-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_135-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68074-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68074-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences