Skip to main content

Post-Sustainability, Regenerative Cultures, and Governance Scale-Up: Transformational Learning Cases of Sociocracy 3.0 in Portugal

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future

Abstract

Communities of practice and local transition experiences have been developed in recent decades. However, it has had a relatively marginal role of an experimental and fragmentary type. There are indeed networks (transition network and GEN), but their relationship is still outsiders vis-à-vis the established society and formal governance. On the other hand, these communities, as social entrepreneurship, have a relatively high “mortality rate,” making hard scale-up governance analyses and proposals. The current pandemic moment may or may not be a turning point in this situation, being one of the motivations of this chapter. Another motivation is the set of concepts that have emerged from criticism and overcoming the paradigm of sustainability: post-sustainability and regenerative cultures. Starting from these concepts and a triangular logic between university, governance, and communities of practices, we seek to learn from those who have already learned, through learning case studies for sustained social transformation. The research that the chapter embodies has an interdisciplinary basis and a direct partnership with actors with experience in using Sociocracy 3.0 (S3) as a social tool, enabling place-based learning. The main objective of this chapter is to discuss the possibilities of scale-up of S3, presenting a set of good practices in the application of this tool in Portugal. The chapter begins by discussing central concepts related to social transformation and transition: post-sustainability; regenerative cultures; S3; scale-up governance; and transformational learning cases. The following is a genealogy of sociocracy from the classic concept to practices as a system of self-organization. Built on collaborative citizen science research, we relate individual life story with the genealogy of social innovation, stating the relevance of the individual on these transition processes. In a collaborative way, the first typology of S3 in Portugal was done, and specifically, eight case studies are then presented, seeking to characterize elements of regeneration and scale-up governance. The contribution of this chapter is to place these communities of practice as true partners for social entrepreneurship of regeneration, creating possibilities for scale-up in a strong articulation with local governments for a better transition management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abegão JLR (2019) Where the wild things were is where humans are now: an overview. Hum Ecol 47:669–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-00099-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett EM, Solan M, Biggs R et al (2016) Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene. Front Ecol Environ 14:441–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blühdorn I (2016) Sustainability— post-sustainability— unsustainability. In: Gabrielson T, Hall C, Meyer JM, Schlosberg D (eds) The Oxford handbook of environmental political theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockelbrink B, Priest J, David L (2021) A practical guide for evolving agile and resilient organizations with Sociocracy 3.0. S3

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland GH (1987) Our common future—call for action. Environ Conserv 14:291–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900016805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck J, Villines S (2007) We the people: consenting to a deeper democracy. Sociocracy.info Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortegano M, Dias RC, Vidal DG, Seixas PC (2021) ‘Mértola, a lab for the future’ as a transformational plan for the mediterranean semi-arid region: a learning case based on landsenses ecology. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1920059

  • Crowley D, Marat-Mendes T, Falanga R et al (2021) Towards a necessary regenerative urban planning. Insights from community-led initiatives for ecocity transformation. Cidades:83–104. https://doi.org/10.15847/CCT.20505

  • Crutzen P, Stoermer E (2000) The ‘Anthropocene’. Glob Chang Newsl 41:17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Czeisler MÉ, Lane RI, Petrosky E et al (2020) Mental health, substance use, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic — United States, June 24–30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69:1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1980) Art as experience. Perigee Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmenger N, Pichler M, Krenmayr N et al (2020) The Sustainable Development Goals prioritize economic growth over sustainable resource use: a critical reflection on the SDGs from a socio-ecological perspective. Sustain Sci 15:1101–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00813-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellet W (2007) The case-study handbook. How to read, discuss and write persuasively about cases. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Endenburg G, Bowden C (1988) Sociocracia: a organização da tomada de decisão: “sem objeção” como princípio da sociocracia. Stichting Sociocratisch Centrum, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster J (2018) Post-sustainability: tragedy and transformation. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Girardet H (2010) Regenerative cities. World Future Council, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Girardet H (2014) Creating regenerative cities. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gorissen L, Spira F, Meynaerts E et al (2018) Moving towards systemic change? Investigating acceleration dynamics of urban sustainability transitions in the Belgian City of Genk. J Clean Prod 173:171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GTDF (2021) Gesturing towards decolonial futures. www.decolonialfutures.net. Accessed 12 Aug 2021

  • Halkos G, Gkampoura EC (2021) Where do we stand on the 17 Sustainable Development Goals? an overview on progress. Econ Anal Policy 70:94–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson J, Hopkins R (2010) Transition in action: totnes and district 2030: an energy descent action plan. Green Books, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins R (2014) The transition handbook: from oil dependency to local resilience. Green Books, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins R (2019) From what is to what if: unleashing the power of imagination to create the future we want. Chelsea Green Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton R (2014) Offline: why the sustainable development goals will fail. Lancet 383:2196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61046-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam DPM, Martín-López B, Wiek A et al (2020) Scaling the impact of sustainability initiatives: a typology of amplification processes. Urban Transform 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-020-00007-9

  • Lambin EF, Kim H, Leape J, Lee K (2020) Scaling up solutions for a sustainability transition. One Earth 3:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach D (2010) Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23:161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mang P, Reed B (2013) Regenerative development and design. In: Loftness V, Haase D (eds) Sustainable built environments. Springer, New York, pp 478–501

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Markard J, Raven R, Truffer B (2012) Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Res Policy 41:955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) Limits to growth. Potomac Associates, Universe Books, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature Editorial Office (2020) Time to revise the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature 583:331–332. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02002-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nóvoa A, Finger M (1988) O Método (Auto)Biográfico e a Formação. DRH Ministério da Saúde, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2020) Global outlook on financing for sustainable development 2021: a new way to invest for people and planet. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poirier J, Clapier-Valadon S, Raybaut P (1983) Les Recits de Vie. Theorie et Pratique. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift M (1984) Sustainable development: exploring the contradictions. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift MR, Guerra L (2002) Pós-sustentabilidade e os novos discursos de sustentabilidade. Raízes Rev Ciências Sociais e Econômicas 21:124–136. https://doi.org/10.37370/raizes.2002.v21.186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed B (2007) Forum: shifting from “sustainability” to regeneration. Build Res Inf 35:674–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701475753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos BS (2010) Para além do pensamento abissal: das linhas globais a uma ecologia dos saberes [Beyond abyssal thinking: from global lines to an ecology of knowledge]. In: Santos BS, Meneses MP (eds) Epistemol do Sul. Cortez, São Paulo, Brazil, pp 31–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Sconfienza UM (2019) The post-sustainability trilemma. J Environ Policy Plan 21:769–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1673156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, PC (1997) O Método Biográfico na Formação de Professores: Uma abordagem crítica. In Laurinda Leite et al. (orgs.) Didácticas e Metodologias da Educação, Departamento de Metodologia da Educação, Universidade do Minho, pp 909–919, Braga

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas PC (2021) The transformational wave. The feedforward century. In: Seixas PC, Lobner N (eds) The transformational wave: beyond Covid-19. Amazon Books, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas PC, Dias RC (2016) “Narrativas de Futuro” como “Resiliência Percebida” e as “Duas Culturas”. Implicações para a “Governança da Resiliência” do Antropoceno. Rev Científica Monfragüe Resiliente 7:121–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas PC, Lobner N (2018) Transformational communities: a programmatic ambivalence as a learning path for the cognitive planet. J Sustain Dev 11:152. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v11n6p152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seixas PC, Dias RC, Pereira P (2017) Uma cidade boa para viver: planejamento cultural e ciência cidadã no desenvolvimento urbano sustentável. A obra nasce Rev Arquit da Univ Fernando Pessoa 12:9–25

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, A/RES/70/1. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch S, Rotmans J (2008) Deepening, broadening and scaling up: a framework for steering transition experiments. Knowledge Centre for Sustainable System Innovations and Transitions (KCT), Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl D (2016) Designing regenerative cultures. Triarchy Press, Dorset

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF (2020) Living planet report 2020 – bending the curve of biodiversity loss. WWF, Gland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xana Piteira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Piteira, X., Vidal, D.G., Dias, R.C., Seixas, P.C. (2022). Post-Sustainability, Regenerative Cultures, and Governance Scale-Up: Transformational Learning Cases of Sociocracy 3.0 in Portugal. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Doni, F., Salvia, A.L. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_135-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_135-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68074-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68074-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics