Skip to main content

Ethical Considerations in Fetal and Pediatric Cardiology

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Pediatric Cardiology

Abstract

Pediatric cardiology as a field has significantly evolved over the last 50 years. As techniques improved and efficacy was established, increasingly rare diagnoses were treated with favorable short- and long-term outcomes that continue to improve. In this chapter, the ethical concepts, frameworks, and applied clinical analysis that are utilized in pediatric cardiology are explored to augment providers’ skills in working through ethical challenges. The field of bioethics and its relevance to pediatric cardiology is introduced, and clinical applications of ethics, controversies surrounding interventions, consideration of genetic and extracardiac anomalies, transplant-related ethics, clinical ethics consultations, regionalization of care and health policy, disparities in care, global perspectives of congenital heart disease (CHD), and ethical issues in innovation are all tackled. By enhancing skills in grappling with the ethical dilemmas intendant to care, the pediatric cardiology practitioner will be well seated to both engage in patient care and continue to help advance the field forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kon AA. Healthcare providers must offer palliative treatment to parents of neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162:844–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mercurio MR, Peterec SM, Weeks B. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome, extreme prematurity, comfort care only, and the principle of justice. Pediatrics. 2008;122:186–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wernovsky G. The paradigm shift toward surgical intervention for neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162:849–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kane JM, Canar J, Kalinowski V, Johnson TJ, Hoehn KS. Management options and outcomes for neonatal hypoplastic left heart syndrome in the early twenty-first century. Pediatr Cardiol. 2016;37:419–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paul EA, Kohlberg EM, Orfali K. Growing discomfort with comfort care for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: why we should still defer to parental wishes. Am J Bioeth. 2017;17:67–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson L. Respect for patient through clinical ethics and standard of best interest. Am J Bioeth. 2017;17:69–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Erkonen GE, Hanfland RA. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: the case against palliative surgery. Am J Bioeth. 2017;17:71–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Devereaux M, Kon AA. May we take our baby with hypoplastic left heart syndrome home? Am J Bioeth. 2017;17:72–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cantor NL. Twenty-five years after Quinlan: a review of the jurisprudence of death and dying. J Law Med Ethics. 2001;29:182–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dep't of Health, 497 U.S. 261. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kant I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten; 1785. Translated as Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals in Kant 1996. https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/blog.nus.edu.sg/dist/c/1868/files/2012/12/Kant-Groundwork-ng0pby.pdf

  12. Mill JS. On liberty. London: Longman, Roberts & Green; 1869.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bentham J. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1789.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hester DM, Schonfeld T. Guidance for healthcare ethics committees. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Caplan A, Arp R. Contemporary debates in bioethics. 1st ed. West Sussex: Wiley; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ravitsky V, Fiester A, Caplan AL, Penn Center (University of Pennsylvania), editors. The Penn Center guide to bioethics. New York: Springer; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principle of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Arras JD. Getting down to cases: the revival of casuistry in bioethics. J Med Philos. 1991;16:29–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Persad G, Wertheimer A, Emanuel EJ. Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions. Lancet. 2009;373:423–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stafinski T, Menon D, Marshall D, Caulfield T. Societal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain? Patient. 2011;4:207–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. White DB, Katz MH, Luce JM, Lo B. Who should receive life support during a public health emergency? Using ethical principles to improve allocation decisions. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:132–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Persad GC, Wertheimer A, Emanuel EJ. Standing by our principles: meaningful guidance, moral foundations, and multi-principle methodology in medical scarcity. Am J Bioeth. 2010;10:46–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Turner L. Bioethics in a multicultural world: medicine and morality in pluralistic settings. Health Care Anal. 2003;11:99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Britton CV, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Pediatric Workforce. Ensuring culturally effective pediatric care: implications for education and health policy. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1677–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1635–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees, 154Cal. app. 2d 560, 317 P2d 170; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paris JJ, Moore MP, Schreiber MD. Physician counseling, informed consent and parental decision making for infants with hypoplastic left-heart syndrome. J Perinatol. 2012;32:748–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Walsh MJ, Verghese GR, Ferguson ME, Fino NF, Goldberg DJ, Owens ST, Pinto N, Zyblewski SC, Quartermain MD. Counseling practices for fetal hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;38:946–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kovacevic A, Simmelbauer A, Starystach S, Elsässer M, Müller A, Bär S, Gorenflo M. Counseling for prenatal congenital heart disease – recommendations based on empirical assessment of counseling success. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kovacevic A, Bär S, Starystach S, et al. Objective assessment of counselling for fetal heart defects: an interdisciplinary multicenter study. J Clin Med. 2020; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020467.

  31. Bratt E-L, Järvholm S, Ekman-Joelsson B-M, Mattson L-Å, Mellander M. Parent’s experiences of counselling and their need for support following a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease – a qualitative study in a Swedish context. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Harris KW, Brelsford KM, Kavanaugh-McHugh A, Clayton EW. Uncertainty of prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease: a qualitative study. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e204082.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hancock HS, Pituch K, Uzark K, et al. A randomised trial of early palliative care for maternal stress in infants prenatally diagnosed with single-ventricle heart disease. Cardiol Young. 2018;28:561–70.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Grootens-Wiegers P, Hein IM, van den Broek JM, de Vries MC. Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17:120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Diekema DS. Adolescent brain development and medical decision-making. Pediatrics. 2020;146:S18–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ross LF. Ethical issues raised by the media portrayal of adolescent transplant refusals. Pediatrics. 2020;146:S33–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. In re Cassandra C., 316 Conn. 476, 112 A.3d 158; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Katz AL, Webb SA, Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1485.

  39. Kopelman LM. The best interests standard for incompetent or incapacitated persons of all ages. J Law Med Ethics. 2007;35:187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Faden R, Beauchamp TL. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ross LF. Better than best (interest standard) in pediatric decision making. J Clin Ethics. 2019;30:183–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Diekema DS. Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention. Theor Med Bioeth. 2004;25:243–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Salter EK. When better isn’t good enough: commentary on Ross’s “better than best (interest standard) in pediatric decision making”. J Clin Ethics. 2019;30:213–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bester JC. The best interest standard is the best we have: why the harm principle and constrained parental autonomy cannot replace the best interest standard in pediatric ethics. J Clin Ethics. 2019;30:223–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kon AA, Davidson JE, Morrison W, Danis M, White DB. Shared decision-making in intensive care units. Executive summary of the American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:1334–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Morrison W, Clark JD, Lewis-Newby M, Kon AA. Titrating clinician directiveness in serious pediatric illness. Pediatrics. 2018;142:S178–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Swanson TM, Patel A, Baxter AJ, Morris SA, Maskatia SA, Lantos JD. Pediatric cardiology specialist’s opinions toward the acceptability of comfort care for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02367-2.

  48. Rychik J. What does palliative care mean in prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease? World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2013;4:80–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fesslova V, Hunter S, Stark J, Taylor JF. Long-term clinical outcome of patients with tricuspid atresia. I. “Natural history”. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;30:262–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kon AA, Patel A, Leuthner S, Lantos JD. Parental refusal of surgery in an infant with tricuspid atresia. Pediatrics. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1730.

  51. Lantos JD. Best interest, harm, god’s will, parental discretion, or utility. Am J Bioeth. 2018;18:7–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Joong A, Gossett JG, Blume ED, Thrush P, Pahl E, Mongé MC, Backer CL, Patel A. Variability in clinical decision-making for ventricular assist device implantation in pediatrics. Pediatr Transplant. 2020;24:e13840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Patel A, Michelson K, Andrei A-C, Pahl E, Gossett JG. Variations in criteria and practices for heart transplantation listing among pediatric transplant cardiologists. Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;40:101–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ares GJ, Buonpane C, Helenowski I, Reynolds M, Hunter CJ. Outcomes and associated ethical considerations of long-run pediatric ECMO at a single center institution. Pediatr Surg Int. 2019;35:321–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Gupta P, McDonald R, Chipman CW, Stroud M, Gossett JM, Imamura M, Bhutta AT. 20-Year experience of prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critically ill children with cardiac or pulmonary failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1584–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Gandhi R, Almond C, Singh TP, Gauvreau K, Piercey G, Thiagarajan RR. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality in infants undergoing heart transplantation in the United States. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:531–536.e1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Dipchand AI, Mahle WT, Tresler M, Naftel DC, Almond C, Kirklin JK, Pruitt E, Webber SA. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to pediatric heart transplantation: effect on post-listing and post-transplantation outcomes. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8:960–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kirsch R, Munson D. Ethical and end of life considerations for neonates requiring ECMO support. Semin Perinatol. 2018;42:129–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pierpont ME, Brueckner M, Chung WK, et al. Genetic basis for congenital heart disease: revisited: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000606.

  60. Nora JJ. Multifactorial inheritance hypothesis for the etiology of congenital heart diseases: the genetic-environmental interaction. Circulation. 1968;38:604–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Nora JJ, Nora AH. The evolution of specific genetic and environmental counseling in congenital heart diseases. Circulation. 1978;57:205–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Bensemlali M, Bajolle F, Ladouceur M, Fermont L, Lévy M, Le Bidois J, Salomon LJ, Bonnet D. Associated genetic syndromes and extracardiac malformations strongly influence outcomes of fetuses with congenital heart diseases. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;109:330–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Marelli AJ, Ionescu-Ittu R, Mackie AS, Guo L, Dendukuri N, Kaouache M. Lifetime prevalence of congenital heart disease in the general population from 2000 to 2010. Circulation. 2014;130:749–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Patel A, Costello JM, Backer CL, Pasquali SK, Hill KD, Wallace AS, Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML. Prevalence of noncardiac and genetic abnormalities in neonates undergoing cardiac operations: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:1607–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Kaulfus ME, Gardiner H, Hashmi SS, Mendez-Figueroa H, Miller VJ, Stevens B, Carter R. Attitudes of clinicians toward cardiac surgery and trisomy 18. J Genet Couns. 2019;28:654–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Boss RD, Holmes KW, Althaus J, Rushton CH, McNee H, McNee T. Trisomy 18 and complex congenital heart disease: seeking the threshold benefit. Pediatrics. 2013;132:161–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Graham EM. Infants with trisomy 18 and complex congenital heart defects should not undergo open heart surgery. J Law Med Ethics. 2016;44:286–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Janvier A, Watkins A. Medical interventions for children with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18: what is the value of a short disabled life? Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:1112–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Janvier A, Okah F, Farlow B, Lantos JD. An infant with trisomy 18 and a ventricular septal defect. Pediatrics. 2011;127:754–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Rasmussen SA, Wong L-YC, Yang Q, May KM, Friedman JM. Population-based analyses of mortality in trisomy 13 and trisomy 18. Pediatrics. 2003;111:777–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Embleton ND, Wyllie JP, Wright MJ, Burn J, Hunter S. Natural history of trisomy 18. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996;75(1):F38–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Costello JP, Weiderhold A, Louis C, Shaughnessy C, Peer SM, Zurakowski D, Jonas RA, Nath DS. A contemporary, single-institutional experience of surgical versus expectant management of congenital heart disease in trisomy 13 and 18 patients. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015;36:987–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kaneko Y, Kobayashi J, Achiwa I, Yoda H, Tsuchiya K, Nakajima Y, Endo D, Sato H, Kawakami T. Cardiac surgery in patients with trisomy 18. Pediatr Cardiol. 2009;30:729–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Cooper DS, Riggs KW, Zafar F, et al. Cardiac surgery in patients with trisomy 13 and 18: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. J Am Heat Assoc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012349.

  75. Janvier A, Farlow B, Wilfond BS. The experience of families with children with trisomy 13 and 18 in social networks. Pediatrics. 2012;130:293–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Morrison WE, Kirsch R. Pushing the ECMO envelope for children with genetic conditions. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18:896–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Balkin EM, Wolfe J, Ziniel SI, Lang PP, Thiagarajan RR, Dillis S, Fynn-Thompson FE, Blume ED. Physician and parent perceptions of prognosis and end-of-life experience in children with advanced heart disease. J Palliat Med. 2015;18:318–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Wilson KA, Dowling AJ, Abdolell M, Tannock IF. Perception of quality of life by patients, partners and treating physicians. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:1041–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Thrush PT, Hoffman TM. Pediatric heart transplantation-indications and outcomes in the current era. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:1080–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Conway J, Dipchand AI. Heart transplantation in children. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2010;57:353–73. Table of contents

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Rossano JW, Cherikh WS, Chambers DC, et al. The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-first pediatric heart transplantation report – 2018; focus theme: multiorgan transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37:1184–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Kantrowitz A, Haller JD, Joos H, Cerruti MM, Carstensen HE. Transplantation of the heart in an infant and an adult. Am J Cardiol. 1968;22:782–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Cooper DK. Christiaan Barnard and his contributions to heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20:599–610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Kirk R, Butts RJ, Dipchand AI. The first successful pediatric heart transplant and results from the earliest era. Pediatr Transplant. 2019;23:e13349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Hugo-Hamman CT, Vosloo SM, De Moor MM, Odell JA. Paediatric heart transplants – should we do them? S Afr Med J. 1991;80:434–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Mavroudis C, Willis RW, Malias M. Orthotopic cardiac transplantation for the neonate. The dilemma of the anencephalic donor. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;97:389–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Michaels MG. Ethical considerations in listing fetuses as candidates for neonatal heart transplantation. JAMA. 1993;269:401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Higgins SS, Paul SM, Hardy CE, Ternullo-Retta C, Affonso D. Infant heart transplantation: a survey of physician beliefs. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1994;13:59–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Doyle J. Their future in your hands. Infant heart transplantation. Prof Nurse. 1992;7:795–6, 798, 799–800.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Mavroudis C, Cook JT, Mavroudis CD. Bioethical controversies in pediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery. Cham: Springer; 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  91. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Ethical principles in the allocation of human organs; 2010. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/professionals/by-topic/ethical-considerations/ethical-principles-in-the-allocation-of-human-organs/

  92. Annas GJ. Denying the rights of the retarded: the Phillip Becker case. Hast Cent Rep. 1979;9:18–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1. Guardianship of Phillip B. Wests Calif Report. 1983;188:781–96.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Overby KJ, Fins JJ. Organ transplantation for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2016;25:272–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Goel AN, Iyengar A, Schowengerdt K, Fiore AC, Huddleston CB. Heart transplantation in children with intellectual disability: an analysis of the UNOS database. Pediatr Transplant. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.12858.

  96. Lantos J. Heart transplantation. Pediatrics. 1987;80:595–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Rossano JW, Kaufman BD, Rame JE. Ethical considerations related to the use of mechanical support in congenital heart disease. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2013;4:70–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Char DS, Lee SS-J, Ikoku AA, Rosenthal D, Magnus D. Can destination therapy be implemented in children with heart failure? A study of provider perceptions. Pediatr Transplant. 2016;20:819–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Hollander SA, Axelrod DM, Bernstein D, Cohen HJ, Sourkes B, Reddy S, Magnus D, Rosenthal DN, Kaufman BD. Compassionate deactivation of ventricular assist devices in pediatric patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35:564–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Kaufman BD, Hollander SA, Zhang Y, et al. Compassionate deactivation of ventricular assist devices in children: a survey of pediatric ventricular assist device clinicians’ perspectives and practices. Pediatr Transplant. 2019;23:e13359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. General considerations in assessment for transplant candidacy; 2015. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/professionals/by-topic/ethical-considerations/general-considerations-in-assessment-for-transplant-candidacy/

  102. Lefkowitz DS, Fitzgerald CJ, Zelikovsky N, Barlow K, Wray J. Best practices in the pediatric pretransplant psychosocial evaluation. Pediatr Transplant. 2014;18:327–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Fung E, Shaw RJ. Pediatric Transplant Rating Instrument – a scale for the pretransplant psychiatric evaluation of pediatric organ transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant. 2008;12:57–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Derrington S, Brook I. 1162. Palliative inotropic support at home for children with end-stage heart failure. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:A1632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Morell E, Wolfe J, Scheurer M, Thiagarajan R, Morin C, Beke DM, Smoot L, Cheng H, Gauvreau K, Blume ED. Patterns of care at end of life in children with advanced heart disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166:745–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Godown J, Kirk R, Joong A, et al. Variability in donor selection among pediatric heart transplant providers: results from an international survey. Pediatr Transplant. 2019;23:e13417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Siegler M. Clinical medical ethics: its history and contributions to American medicine. J Clin Ethics. 2019;30:17–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities, editor. Core competencies for health care ethics consultation. 2nd ed. Chicago: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Kesselheim JC, Johnson J, Joffe S. Ethics consultation in children’s hospitals: results from a survey of pediatric clinical ethicists. Pediatrics. 2010;125:742–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Fox E, Myers S, Pearlman RA. Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: a national survey. Am J Bioeth. 2007;7:13–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities Healthcare Ethics Consultant-Certified Program. https://asbh.org/certification/hcec-certification

  112. Oster ME, Lee KA, Honein MA, Riehle-Colarusso T, Shin M, Correa A. Temporal trends in survival among infants with critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e1502–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Welke KF, O’Brien SM, Peterson ED, Ungerleider RM, Jacobs ML, Jacobs JP. The complex relationship between pediatric cardiac surgical case volumes and mortality rates in a national clinical database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:1133–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Pasquali SK, Li JS, Burstein DS, Sheng S, O’Brien SM, Jacobs ML, Jaquiss RDB, Peterson ED, Gaynor JW, Jacobs JP. Association of center volume with mortality and complications in pediatric heart surgery. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e370–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Jacobs JP, O’Brien SM, Pasquali SK, et al. Variation in outcomes for benchmark operations: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:2184–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Patel A, Gandhi R. An ethical argument for professional regulation and regionalization of care in pediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery. Pediatr Cardiol. 2020;41:651–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery public reporting. https://publicreporting.sts.org/chsd

  118. Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML. Transparency and public reporting of pediatric and congenital heart surgery outcomes in North America. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2016;7:49–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Lihn SL, Kugler JD, Peterson LE, Lannon CM, Pickles D, Beekman RH. Transparency in a pediatric quality improvement collaborative: a passionate journey by NPC-QIC clinicians and parents: transparency in a pediatric quality improvement collaborative. Congenit Heart Dis. 2015;10:572–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Shahian DM, Edwards FH, Jacobs JP, Prager RL, Normand S-LT, Shewan CM, O’Brien SM, Peterson ED, Grover FL. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: part 1 – history, rationale, consequences. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:S2–S11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Shahian DM, Edwards FH, Jacobs JP, Prager RL, Normand S-LT, Shewan CM, O’Brien SM, Peterson ED, Grover FL. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: part 2 – implementation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:S12–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Irons ML, Gaynor JW, Spray TL, Feudtner C. Parents’ preferences regarding public reporting of outcomes in congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:606–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Jameton A. Dilemmas of moral distress: moral responsibility and nursing practice. AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs. 1993;4:542–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Hamric AB, Epstein EG, White KR. Moral distress and the healthcare organization in managerial ethics in healthcare: a new perspective. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Collins RT, Shin AY, Hanley FL. Sacrificing the future for the sake of the present. Ann Surg. 2020;271:225–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Lundström NR, Berggren H, Björkhem G, Jögi P, Sunnegårdh J. Centralization of pediatric heart surgery in Sweden. Pediatr Cardiol. 2000;21:353–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Hraska V, Podnar T, Kunovsky P, Kovacikova L, Kaldararova M, Horvathova E, Masura J, Mayer JE. Is a learning curve for arterial switch operation in small countries still acceptable? Model for cooperation in Europe. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:352–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Welke KF, Pasquali SK, Lin P, Backer CL, Overman DM, Romano JC, Karamlou T. Regionalization of congenital heart surgery in the United States. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32:128–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Pasquali SK, Thibault D, O’Brien SM, et al. National variation in congenital heart surgery outcomes. Circulation. 2020;142:1351–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Backer CL, Pasquali SK, Dearani JA. Improving national outcomes in congenital heart surgery: the time has come for regionalization of care. Circulation. 2020;141:943–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Backer CL, Karamlou T, Welke KF. More evidence for regionalization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:2919–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Karamlou T, Johnston DR, Backer CL, Roselli EE, Welke KF, Caldarone CA, Svensson LG. Access or excess? Examining the argument for regionalized cardiac care. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160:813–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Anagnostopoulos PV, Ralphe JC, Greenberg C. Commentary. Regionalization of congenital heart care in the United States: small improvements in outcomes-but at what expense? Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32:138–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics. 2012;130:587–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Wang KS, Cummings J, Stark A, Houck C, Oldham K, Grant C, Fallat M, Section on surgery, Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Optimizing resources in children’s surgical care: an update on the American College of Surgeons’ Verification Program. Pediatrics. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-0708.

  136. Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1971.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  137. Marmot M, Bell R. Fair society, healthy lives. Public Health. 2012;126(Suppl 1):S4–S10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Goldberg DS. Public health ethics and social determinants of health, Springer briefs in public health. New York: Springer; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  139. Peyvandi S, Baer RJ, Moon-Grady AJ, Oltman SP, Chambers CD, Norton ME, Rajagopal S, Ryckman KK, Jelliffe-Pawlowski LL, Steurer MA. Socioeconomic mediators of racial and ethnic disparities in congenital heart disease outcomes: a population-based study in California. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e010342.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Hill GD, Block JR, Tanem JB, Frommelt MA. Disparities in the prenatal detection of critical congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:859–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Jackson JL, Morack J, Harris M, DeSalvo J, Daniels CJ, Chisolm DJ. Racial disparities in clinic follow-up early in life among survivors of congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis. 2019;14:305–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Salciccioli KB, Oluyomi A, Lupo PJ, Ermis PR, Lopez KN. A model for geographic and sociodemographic access to care disparities for adults with congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis. 2019;14:752–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Best KE, Vieira R, Glinianaia SV, Rankin J. Socio-economic inequalities in mortality in children with congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019;33:291–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Lopez KN, Morris SA, Sexson Tejtel SK, Espaillat A, Salemi JL. US mortality attributable to congenital heart disease across the lifespan from 1999 through 2017 exposes persistent racial/ethnic disparities. Circulation. 2020;142:1132–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Tchervenkov CI, Jacobs JP, Bernier P-L, et al. The improvement of care for paediatric and congenital cardiac disease across the World: a challenge for the World Society for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery. Cardiol Young. 2008;18(Suppl 2):63–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Hoffman JI. The global burden of congenital heart disease. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2013;24:141–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Liu Y, Chen S, Zühlke L, Black GC, Choy M-K, Li N, Keavney BD. Global birth prevalence of congenital heart defects 1970–2017: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 260 studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48:455–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Zühlke L, Lawrenson J, Comitis G, De Decker R, Brooks A, Fourie B, Swanson L, Hugo-Hamman C. Congenital heart disease in low- and lower-middle-income countries: current status and new opportunities. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019;21:163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Broberg CS, Shen I, Menashe V, Starr A. Emergence of the arterial switch procedure for transposition of the great arteries and the potential cost of surgical innovation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154:1047–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Birchley G, Ives J, Huxtable R, Blazeby J. Conceptualising surgical innovation: an eliminativist proposal. Health Care Anal. 2020;28:73–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Section on Surgery, Committee on Bioethics, American Pediatric Surgical Association New Technology Committee. Responsible innovation in children’s surgical care. Pediatrics. 2017;139:e20163437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Hill JD. John H. Gibbon, Jr. Part I. The development of the first successful heart-lung machine. Ann Thorac Surg. 1982;34:337–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Cooley DA. The first Blalock–Taussig shunt. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:750–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Marathe SP, Talwar S. Surgery for transposition of great arteries: a historical perspective. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2015;8:122–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. Norwood WI, Kirklin JK, Sanders SP. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: experience with palliative surgery. Am J Cardiol. 1980;45:87–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Anderson RH. Francis Fontan. Cardiol Young. 1999;9:592–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Bull C, Yates R, Sarkar D, Deanfield J, de Leval M. Scientific, ethical, and logistical considerations in introducing a new operation: a retrospective cohort study from paediatric cardiac surgery. BMJ. 2000;320:1168–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. Galantowicz M, Cheatham JP. Lessons learned from the development of a new hybrid strategy for the management of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol. 2005;26:190–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Galantowicz M, Cheatham JP, Phillips A, Cua CL, Hoffman TM, Hill SL, Rodeman R. Hybrid approach for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: intermediate results after the learning curve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:2063–70. Discussion 2070–1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Moaddab A, Nassr AA, Belfort MA, Shamshirsaz AA. Ethical issues in fetal therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;43:58–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Ethics, American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. Maternal-fetal intervention and fetal care centers. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e473–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Hirst A, Agha RA, Rosin D, McCulloch P. How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: the IDEAL framework for action. Int J Surg. 2013;11:1038–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Hirst A, Philippou Y, Blazeby J, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations. Ann Surg. 2019;269:211–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Broekman ML, Carrière ME, Bredenoord AL. Surgical innovation: the ethical agenda: a systematic review. Medicine. 2016;95:e3790.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  165. The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research; 1979. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html#xrespect

  166. Karpowicz L, Bell E, Racine E. Ethics oversight mechanisms for surgical innovation: a systematic and comparative review of arguments. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016;11:135–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rupali Gandhi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Gandhi, R., Kirsch, R., Patel, A. (2023). Ethical Considerations in Fetal and Pediatric Cardiology. In: Abdulla, Ri., et al. Pediatric Cardiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42937-9_4-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42937-9_4-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42937-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42937-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics