Abstract
The most widely used assays for detecting chemically induced gene mutations are those employing bacteria. The plate incorporation assay using various Salmonella typhimurium LT2 and E. coli WP2 strains is a short-term bacterial reverse mutation assay specifically designed to detect a wide range of chemical substances capable of causing DNA damage leading to gene mutations. The test is used worldwide as an initial screen to determine the mutagenic potential of new chemicals and drugs.
The test uses several strains of S. typhimurium which carry different mutations in various genes of the histidine operon, and E. coli which carry the same AT base pair at the critical mutation site within the trpE gene. These mutations act as hot spots for mutagens that cause DNA damage via different mechanisms. When these auxotrophic bacterial strains are grown on a minimal media agar plates containing a trace of the required amino-acid (histidine or tryptophan), only those bacteria that revert to amino-acid independence (His+ or Tryp+) will grow to form visible colonies. The number of spontaneously induced revertant colonies per plate is relatively constant. However, when a mutagen is added to the plate, the number of revertant colonies per plate is increased, usually in a dose-related manner.
This chapter provides detailed procedures for performing the test in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system (S9-mix), including advice on specific assay variations and any technical problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, B. N. (1971) The detection of chemical mutagens with enteric bacteria, in Chemical Mutagens, Principles and Methods for Their Detection. Volume 1 (Hollander, A; ed.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 267–282
Mortelmans, K. E., and Dousman, L. (1986) Mutagenesis and plasmids, in Chemical Mutagens, Principles and Methods for their Detection, Volume 10. (de Serres, F. J; ed.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 469–508.
ICH (International Conference on Harmonisation), Guideline on Specific Aspects of Regulatory Genotoxicity Tests, Fed.Reg. 61: 18199, April 24, 1996 (ICH S) and 62:62472, November 21, 1997 (ICH 2B).2A, 1995.
OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, Genetic Toxicology No. 471, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris, 21 July 1997.
USEPA, Part 712-C-98-247, Health Effects Test Guidelines OPPTS 870.5100, Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Prevention and Toxic Substances (7101), August 1998.
Tennant, R. W., Margolin, B., Shelby, M., Zeiger, E., Haseman, J., Spalding, J., Resnick, W., Stasiewicz, M., Anderson, B., and Minor, R. (1987) Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity in rodents from in vitro genetic toxicity assays. Science, 236, 933–941.
Ashby, J. and Tennant, R. W. (1988) Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indices of genotoxic carcinogens among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by the US NCI/NTP. Mutat. Res. 204, 17–115.
Eliott, B., Coombs, R., Elcombe, C., Gatehouse, D., Gibson, G., MacKay, J., and Wolf, R. (1992) Report of UKEMS Working Party: Alternatives to Aroclor1254 induced S9 in in vitro genotoxicity assays. Mutagenesis, 7, 175–177.
Yahagi, T., Degawa, W., Seino, Y., Matsushima, T., Nagao, M., Sugimura, T., and Hashimoto, Y. (1975) Mutagenicity of carcinogenic azo-dyes and their derivatives. Cancer Lett. 1, 91–97.
Simmon, V. F., Kauhanen, K., Tardiff, R. (1977) Mutagenic activities of chemicals identified in drinking water, in Progress in Genetic Toxicology (Scott, D., Bridges, B., and Sobels, F., eds.), Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam, pp.249–258.
Araki, A., Noguchi, T., Kato, F., and Matsushima, T. (1994) Improved method for mutagenicity testing of gaseous compounds by using a gas sampling bag. Mutat. Res. 307, 335–344.
Margolin, B., Kaplan, N., and Zeiger, E . (1981) Statistical analysis of the Ames Salmonella/microsome test. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 78, 3779–3783.
Stead, A., Hasselblad, J., and Claxton, L. (1981) Modeling the Ames test. Mutat. Res. 85, 13–27.
Mahon, G., Green, M., Middleton, B., Mitchell, I., Robinson, W., and Tweats, D. (1989) Analysis of data from microbial colony assays, in UKEMS Sub-Committee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing. Report: Part III. Statistical Evaluation of Mutagenicity Test Data (Kirkland, D. J., ed.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. pp.28–65.
Gatehouse, D., Haworth, S., Cebula, T., Gocke, E., Kier, L., Matsushima, T., Melcion, C., Nohmi, T., Ohta, T., Venitt, S., and Zeiger, E. (1994) Recommendations for the performance of bacterial mutation assays. Mutat. Res. 312, 217–233.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Gatehouse, D. (2012). Bacterial Mutagenicity Assays: Test Methods. In: Parry, J., Parry, E. (eds) Genetic Toxicology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 817. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-421-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-421-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-420-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-421-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols