Abstract
Computational methods now play an integral role in modern drug discovery, and include the design and management of small molecule libraries, initial hit identification through virtual screening, optimization of the affinity and selectivity of hits, and improving the physicochemical properties of the lead compounds. In this chapter, we survey the most important data sources for the discovery of new molecular entities, and discuss the key considerations and guidelines for virtual chemical library design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Klebe G (2006) Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations. Drug Discov Today 11:580–594
Olah M, Mracec M, Ostopovici L et al (2004) WOMBAT: world of molecular bioactivity. In: Oprea TI (ed) Chemoinformatics in drug discovery, Wiley-VCH, New York
Goto S, Okuno Y, Hattori M et al (2002) LIGAND: database of chemical compounds and reactions in biological pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 30:402–404
Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK (2004) ZINC–a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 45:177–182
Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC et al (2006) DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D668–672
Chen J, Swamidass SJ, Dou Y et al (2005) ChemDB: a public database of small molecules and related chemoinformatics resources. Bioinformatics 21:4133–4139
Jónsdóttir SO, Jørgensen FS, Brunak S (2005) Prediction methods and databases within chemoinformatics: emphasis on drugs and drug candidates. Bioinformatics 21:2145–2160
Agrafiotis DK, Lobanov VS, Salemme FR (2002) Combinatorial informatics in the post-genomics era. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1:337–346
Leland BA, Christie BD, Nourse JG et al (1997) Managing the combinatorial expansion. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 37:62–70
Leach AR, Bradshaw J, Green DVS et al (1999) Implementation of a system for reagent selection and library enumeration, profiling and design. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39:1161–1172
Lobanov VS, Agrafiotis DK (2002) Scalable methods for the construction and analysis of virtual combinatorial libraries. Combin Chem High-Throughput Screen 5:167–178
Livingston DJ (2000) The characterization of molecular structures using molecular properties. A survey. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 40:195–209
Brown RD, Hassan M, Waldman M (2000) Combinatorial library design for diversity, cost efficiency, and drug-like character. J Mol Graph Model 18:427–437
O’Donovan C, Apweiler R, Bairoch A (2001) The human proteomics initiative (HPI). Trends Biotechnol 19:178–181
Bohacek RS, McMartin C, Guida WC (1996) The art and practice of structure-based drug design: a molecular modelling perspective. Med Res Rev 16:3–50
Lipinski CA (2000) Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. J Pharmacol Toxicol 44:235–249
Hou T, Wang J, Zhang W et al (2006) Recent advances in computational prediction of drug absorption and permeability in drug discovery. Curr Med Chem 13:2653–2667
Ghose AK, Viswanadhan VN, Wendoloski JJ (1999) A knowledge-based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery. 1. A qualitative and quantitative characterization of known drug databases. J Comb Chem 1:55–68
Oprea T (2000) Property distribution of drug-related chemical databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des 14:251–264
Wenlock MC, Austin RP, Barton P et al (2003) A comparison of physicochemical property profiles of development and marketed oral drugs. J Med Chem 46:1250–1256
Congreve M, Carr R, Murray C et al (2003) A “rule of three” for fragment-based lead discovery? Drug Discov Today 8:876–877
Song CM, Tong JC (2009) Recent advances in computer-aided drug design. Brief Bioinform 10:579–591
Gasteiger J, Marsili M (1978) A new model for calculating atomic charges in molecules. Tetrahedron Lett 19:3181–3184
Cornell WD, Cieplak P et al (1995). A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules. J. Am Chem Soc 117: 5179–5197
Halgren TA (1996) Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94. J Comp Chem 17:490–519
Jakalian A, Jack DB, Bayly CI (2002) Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation. J Comput Chem 23:1623–1641
Baell JB, Holloway GA (2010) New Substructure Filters for Removal of Pan Assay Interference Compounds (PAINS) from Screening Libraries and for Their Exclusion in Bioassays. J Med Chem 53:2719–2740
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Bernardo, P.H., Tong, J.C. (2012). In Silico Design of Small Molecules. In: Zanders, E. (eds) Chemical Genomics and Proteomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 800. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-349-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-349-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-348-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-349-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols