Abstract
A review is given on design options to be considered in epidemiologic studies on cancers or other chronic diseases in relation to risk factors, the measurement of which is based on stored specimens in large biobanks. The two major choices for valid and cost-efficient sampling of risk factor data from large biobank cohorts are provided by the nested case–control design, and the case–cohort design. The main features of both designs are outlined and their relative merits are compared. Special issues such as matching, stratification, and statistical analysis are also briefly discussed. It is concluded that the nested case–control design is better suited for studies involving biomarkers that can be influenced by analytic batch, long-term storage, and freeze-thaw cycles. The case–cohort design is useful, especially when several outcomes are of interest, given that the measurements on stored materials remain sufficiently stable during the study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
dos Santos Silva, I. (1999). Cancer Epidemiology: Principles and Methods. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon.
Rothman, KJ., Greenland, S., and Lash, TL. (2008). Modern Epidemiology, 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
Borgan, Ø and Samuelssen, S.-O. (2003). A review of cohort sampling designs for Cox’s regression model: Potentials for epidemiology. Norsk Epidemiologi 13, 239–248. http://www.medisin.ntnu.no/ism/nofe/norepid/2003(2)%2008-Borgan.pdf
Rundle, A.G., Vineis, P. and Ahsan, H. (2005). Design Options for Molecular Epidemiology Research within Cohort Studies. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 14, 1899–1907.
Tedeschi, R., Bloigu, A., Ögmundsdottir, H.M. et al. (2007). Activation of Maternal Epstein-Barr Virus Infection and Risk of Acute Leukemia in the Offspring. American Journal of Epidemioloy 165, 134–137.
Komulainen, K., Alanne, M., Auro, K. et al. (2006). Risk Alleles of USF1-Gene Predict Cardiovascular Disease of Women in Two Prospective Studies. PLoS Genetics 2, e69.
Maclure, M. and Schneeweiss, S. (2001). Causation of Bias: The Episcope. Epidemiology 12, 114–122.
Langholz, B. and Borgan, Ø. (1997). Estimation of Absolute Risk from Nested Case–control Data. Biometrics 53, 768–775.
Langholz B and Borgan Ø. (1995). Counter-Matching: A Stratified Nested Case–control Sampling Method. Biometrika 82, 69–79.
Samuelsen, S.-O., Ånestad, H. and Skrondal, A. (2007). Stratified Case–cohort Analysis of General Cohort Sampling Designs. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 34, 103–119.
Saarela, O., Kulathinal, S., Arjas, E. and Läärä, E. (2008). Nested Case–control Data Utilized for Multiple Outcomes: A Likelihood Approach and Alternatives. Statistics in Medicine 27, 5991–6008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Läärä, E. (2011). Study Designs for Biobank-Based Epidemiologic Research on Chronic Diseases. In: Dillner, J. (eds) Methods in Biobanking. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 675. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-423-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-423-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-995-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-423-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols