Abstract
Genome sequencing methods have basically similar algorithms, although they show a few differences between the platforms. The human genome contains approximately three billion base pairs, and this amount is huge and therefore impossible to sequence at one step. However, this amount is not a problem for developed technology. Researchers break DNA into small random pieces and then sequence and reassemble. Library preparation, sequencing, bioinformatic approaches and reporting. High-quality library preparation is critical and the most important part of the next-generation sequencing workflow. Successful sequencing directly requires high-quality libraries. Sequencing is second step and all high-throughput sequencing approaches are generally based on conventional Sanger sequencing. After preparation of library and sequencing, later steps are completely computer-based (in silico) approaches called as bioinformatics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alwi ZB (2005) The use of SNPs in pharmacogenomics studies. Malays J Med Sci 12(2):4–12
Peet NP, Bey P (2001) Pharmacogenomics: challenges and opportunities. Drug Discov Today 6(10):495–498
Roses AD (2000) Pharmacogenetics and the practice of medicine. Nature 405(6788):857–865. https://doi.org/10.1038/35015728
Hoehe MR, Kroslak T (2004) Genetic variation and pharmacogenomics: concepts, facts, and challenges. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 6(1):5–26
Roden DM, Altman RB, Benowitz NL, Flockhart DA, Giacomini KM, Johnson JA et al (2006) Pharmacogenomics: challenges and opportunities. Ann Intern Med 145(10):749–757
de Man FM, Goey AKL, van Schaik RHN, Mathijssen RHJ, Bins S (2018) Individualization of irinotecan treatment: a review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics. Clin Pharmacokinet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-018-0644-7
Muir P, Li S, Lou S, Wang D, Spakowicz DJ, Salichos L et al (2016) The real cost of sequencing: scaling computation to keep pace with data generation. Genome Biol 17:53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0917-0
Gonzaga-Jauregui C, Lupski JR, Gibbs RA (2012) Human genome sequencing in health and disease. Annu Rev Med 63:35–61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-051010-162644
Meienberg J, Bruggmann R, Oexle K, Matyas G (2016) Clinical sequencing: is WGS the better WES? Hum Genet 135(3):359–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-015-1631-9
Belkadi A, Bolze A, Itan Y, Cobat A, Vincent QB, Antipenko A et al (2015) Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(17):5473–5478. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418631112
Stasik S, Schuster C, Ortlepp C, Platzbecker U, Bornhäuser M, Schetelig J et al (2018) An optimized targeted Next-Generation Sequencing approach for sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants. Biomol Detect Quantif 15:6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2017.12.001
Kukurba KR, Montgomery SB (2015) RNA sequencing and analysis. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2015(11):951–969. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.top084970
Nalpathamkalam T, Derkach A, Paterson AD, Merico D (2014) Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 single-nucleotide variant prioritization based on protein impact, sequence conservation, and gene annotation. BMC Proc 8.(Suppl 1 Genetic Analysis Workshop 18Vanessa Olmo:S11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-8-S1-S11
Marian AJ (2014) Sequencing your genome: what does it mean? Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 10(1):3–6
Head SR, Komori HK, LaMere SA, Whisenant T, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Salomon DR et al (2014) Library construction for next-generation sequencing: overviews and challenges. Biotechniques 56(2):61–64, 66, 68, passim. https://doi.org/10.2144/000114133
Hedegaard J, Thorsen K, Lund MK, Hein AM, Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Vang S et al (2014) Next-generation sequencing of RNA and DNA isolated from paired fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of human cancer and normal tissue. PLoS One 9(5):e98187. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098187
Einaga N, Yoshida A, Noda H, Suemitsu M, Nakayama Y, Sakurada A et al (2017) Assessment of the quality of DNA from various formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues and the use of this DNA for next-generation sequencing (NGS) with no artifactual mutation. PLoS One 12(5):e0176280. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176280
Liu L, Li Y, Li S, Hu N, He Y, Pong R et al (2012) Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012:251364. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/251364
Buermans HP, den Dunnen JT (2014) Next generation sequencing technology: advances and applications. Biochim Biophys Acta 1842(10):1932–1941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.06.015
Ekblom R, Wolf JB (2014) A field guide to whole-genome sequencing, assembly and annotation. Evol Appl 7(9):1026–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12178
Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, Korbel JO et al (2015) A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526(7571):68–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15393
Hildebrandt F, Heeringa SF, Rüschendorf F, Attanasio M, Nürnberg G, Becker C et al (2009) A systematic approach to mapping recessive disease genes in individuals from outbred populations. PLoS Genet 5(1):e1000353. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000353
Wray NR, Goddard ME, Visscher PM (2007) Prediction of individual genetic risk to disease from genome-wide association studies. Genome Res 17(10):1520–1528. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.6665407
Abraham G, Inouye M (2015) Genomic risk prediction of complex human disease and its clinical application. Curr Opin Genet Dev 33:10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2015.06.005
Wilkening S, Chen B, Bermejo JL, Canzian F (2009) Is there still a need for candidate gene approaches in the era of genome-wide association studies? Genomics 93(5):415–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.12.011
Patnala R, Clements J, Batra J (2013) Candidate gene association studies: a comprehensive guide to useful in silico tools. BMC Genet 14:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-14-39
Ball AD, Stapley J, Dawson DA, Birkhead TR, Burke T, Slate J (2010) A comparison of SNPs and microsatellites as linkage mapping markers: lessons from the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). BMC Genomics 11:218. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-218
Wallace C, Dobson RJ, Munroe PB, Caulfield MJ (2007) Information capture using SNPs from HapMap and whole-genome chips differs in a sample of inflammatory and cardiovascular gene-centric regions from genome-wide estimates. Genome Res 17(11):1596–1602. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.5996407
Rüschendorf F, Nürnberg P (2005) ALOHOMORA: a tool for linkage analysis using 10K SNP array data. Bioinformatics 21(9):2123–2125. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti264
Hoffmann K, Lindner TH (2005) easyLINKAGE-Plus—automated linkage analyses using large-scale SNP data. Bioinformatics 21(17):3565–3567. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti571
Inaoka K, Inokawa Y, Nomoto S (2015) Genomic-wide analysis with microarrays in human oncology. Microarrays (Basel) 4(4):454–473. https://doi.org/10.3390/microarrays4040454
Ballester B, Johnson N, Proctor G, Flicek P (2010) Consistent annotation of gene expression arrays. BMC Genomics 11:294. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-294
Karczewski KJ, Daneshjou R, Altman RB (2012) Chapter 7: Pharmacogenomics. PLoS Comput Biol 8(12):e1002817. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002817
Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M (2009) RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10(1):57–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2484
Wang DG, Fan JB, Siao CJ, Berno A, Young P, Sapolsky R et al (1998) Large-scale identification, mapping, and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome. Science 280(5366):1077–1082
Fan JB, Oliphant A, Shen R, Kermani BG, Garcia F, Gunderson KL et al (2003) Highly parallel SNP genotyping. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 68:69–78
Kurg A, Tõnisson N, Georgiou I, Shumaker J, Tollett J, Metspalu A (2000) Arrayed primer extension: solid-phase four-color DNA resequencing and mutation detection technology. Genet Test 4(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/109065700316408
Gunderson KL, Steemers FJ, Ren H, Ng P, Zhou L, Tsan C et al (2006) Whole-genome genotyping. Methods Enzymol 410:359–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(06)10017-8
DeRisi J, Penland L, Brown PO, Bittner ML, Meltzer PS, Ray M et al (1996) Use of a cDNA microarray to analyse gene expression patterns in human cancer. Nat Genet 14(4):457–460. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1296-457
LaFramboise T (2009) Single nucleotide polymorphism arrays: a decade of biological, computational and technological advances. Nucleic Acids Res 37(13):4181–4193. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp552
Bock C (2012) Analysing and interpreting DNA methylation data. Nat Rev Genet 13(10):705–719. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3273
Kurdyukov S, Bullock M (2016) DNA methylation analysis: choosing the right method. Biology (Basel) 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/biology5010003
Rew DA (2001) DNA microarray technology in cancer research. Eur J Surg Oncol 27(5):504–508. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejso.2001.1116
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Yucesan, E., Ozten, N. (2019). Pharmacogenetics: Role of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms. In: Batra, J., Srinivasan, S. (eds) Theranostics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2054. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9769-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9769-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9768-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9769-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols