Abstract
Pharmaceuticals and their active metabolites are one of the significantly emerging environmental toxicants. The major routes of entry of pharmaceuticals into the environment are industries, hospitals, or direct disposal of unwanted or expired drugs made by the patient. The most important and distinct features of pharmaceuticals are that they are deliberately designed to have an explicit mode of action and designed to exert an effect on humans and other living systems. This distinctive feature makes pharmaceuticals and their metabolites different from other chemicals, and this necessitates the evaluation of the direct effects of pharmaceuticals in various environmental compartments as well as to living systems. In this background, the alarming situation of ecotoxicity of diverse pharmaceuticals have forced government and nongovernment regulatory authorities to recommend the application of in silico methods to provide quick information about the risk assessment and fate properties of pharmaceuticals as well as their ecological and indirect human health effects. This chapter aims to offer information regarding occurrence of pharmaceuticals in the environment, their persistence, environmental fate, and toxicity as well as application of in silico methods to provide information about the basic risk management and fate prediction of pharmaceuticals in the environment. Brief ideas about toxicity endpoints, available ecotoxicity databases, and expert systems employed for rapid toxicity predictions of ecotoxicity of pharmaceuticals are also discussed.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download protocol PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Key words
1 Introduction
A significant amount of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites have been found in the various environmental compartments causing damage to the environment and hazard to the living systems. Due to an increase in application of human and veterinary medicines manyfold, pharmaceuticals and their metabolite residues have been found in rivers, sewage effluents, streams and in surface, ground, and potable water, creating a big concern for the ecologists [1]. The primary routes of entrance of pharmaceuticals into the environment are domestic, hospital, and industrial wastes [2]. Pharmaceuticals are excreted in urine or feces as a mixture of unchanged chemicals and metabolites and enter into the environment through septic tank and sewage systems [1]. On the other hand, ecotoxicity data of pharmaceuticals are available in the literature for less than 1 % of the drugs, and only a small number of pharmaceuticals and their residues have been subjected to risk assessment employing ecotoxicological tests.
Pharmaceuticals are intentionally designed to have a specific mode of action and exert an effect on specific organs, tissues, cells, or biomolecules in humans, mammals, or other vertebrates, and many of them are persistent in the body [3]. As a consequence, when pharmaceuticals and their unaltered metabolites enter into the environment by different means, they can affect humans as well as other living species. There are many drugs whose specific effects or modes of action are not well known, and they often produce effects through several modes of action. These distinguished features make pharmaceuticals dissimilar from others and this is the sole reason to assess the potential acute and chronic effects of pharmaceuticals in diverse environmental compartments. It is quite apparent that the toxic effects of pharmaceuticals on diverse organisms in aquatic as well as nonaquatic environment are due to their long persistent and bio-accumulative nature [4]. In view of the serious issue of pharmaceutical toxicity to the environment, it is vital to categorize the proper source, occurrence, effects, and fate of each individual pharmaceutical product as well as to perform the risk assessment and risk management of ecotoxicological effects of the pharmaceutical chemicals and their metabolites [1, 2].
Antibiotics are one of the majorly used pharmaceuticals in human and veterinary medicines. The world consumption of antibiotics has risen radically in the last decade, also increasing the elimination of their metabolites in their original form. Most antibiotics are poorly metabolized after ingestion, probably resulting in a fraction of antibiotics from 25 to 75 % leaving the bodies in an unaltered form after consumption [5]. Additionally, a high percentage of the antibiotics added to the animal feed are excreted in urine or manure. In some cases, as much as 90 % of the antibiotic administered orally may pass through the animal unchanged and excreted in urine and manure. Thereafter, these antibiotics can enter surface and groundwater and be strongly adsorbed in soils and are not readily degradable [6]. Vidaver [7] estimates that 53,000 ha of fruit and vegetable plants are sprayed annually with antibiotics. For example, streptomycin and oxytetracycline are registered by the US Environment Protection Agency (USEPA) for use in plant agriculture. Utilization of transgenic plants to produce inexpensive antibiotics may also be a cause of environmental hazards due to the existence of crop residues, roots, and root exudates in the soil which can act as a continuous source of residual antibiotics to soil fauna and flora [8].
While pharmaceuticals and their metabolite residues are detected in rivers, streams, sewage influents and effluents, surface, ground, and potable waters [9], it may be noted that the drinking water treatment methods reduce residues, but they are incapable of removing the contaminant pharmaceuticals absolutely. According to a nationwide study of “emerging pollutants” in waters, the US Geological Survey (USGS) tested for pharmaceuticals in 139 rivers in 30 states of the USA, detecting diverse therapeutic classes of biologically active compounds [10]. The cardiovascular drug propranolol has been reported downstream from the sewage treatment plant [11]. The antiepileptic drugs carbamazepine and clofibrate are two most persistent pharmaceuticals which have been detected in the environment [2]. Major detected drugs in rivers were beta blockers (e.g., metoprolol up to 1.54 μg/l) and beta-sympathomimetics, estrogens (e.g., 17β-estradiol up to 0.013 μg/l) [12], analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g., Diclofenac up to 1.2 μg/l) [13], and also antibiotics (e.g., erythromycin up to 1.7 μg/l) [12], as well as lipid-lowering agents (e.g., clofibrinic acid up to 0.2 μg/l) [14] and antiepileptic drugs (e.g., carbamazepine up to 2.1 μg/l) [13]. Presence of clofibric acid, propylphenazone, and diclofenac has been reported in the drinking water of Berlin in the concentration range of several hundreds of nanograms per liter [15]. Paracetamol, diclofenac, and carbamazepine were monitored in drinking water in Southern France [16], and clofibric acid and diazepams were detected in treated drinking water in Milan, Italy [17]. Psychoactive and illicit drugs amphetamine, cocaine and its metabolite benzoylecgonine, morphine, 6-acetylmorphine, 11-nor-9-carboxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, methadone and its main metabolite 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine have been detected in surface and waste waters [18]. Schultz and Furlong found highest concentrations of antidepressant drugs venlafaxine, citalopram, and bupropion 1000 ± 400 ng/l, 90 ± 20 ng/l, and 60 ± 40 ng/l, respectively, in samples collected downstream from a water reclamation plant [19]. The maximum determined concentration of fluoxetine was 0.099 ng/l in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents in Canada [20].
Nonprescription drugs like caffeine, cotinine, and acetaminophenone are found in samples of potable water collected near Atlanta, Georgia [21]. Tauber detected carbamazepine and gemfibrozil in drinking waters in ten cities in Canada that were examined for a 44-drug subset consisting pharmaceuticals including sulfonamides, quinolones, tetracyclines, and macrolide antibiotics [22]. Oraine and Pettigrove identified and quantified ibuprofen (0.93 μg/l) and ibuprofen methyl ester (4.95 μg/l) in finished water in alarming quantity [23]. Median concentrations of 0.02 μg/l and 0.12 μg/l were reported for ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin, respectively, for samples from 139 surface streams across the USA. Ciprofloxacin in the range 0.7–124.5 μg/l was found in wastewater of a Swiss hospital [24]. Hellweger et al. [25] claimed that environmental concentrations of tetracycline in surface waters are usually less than 0.11 mg/l, although higher values of up to 6.8 mg/l have been observed. Estrogens, a sex hormone, have been detected in plasticizers and preservatives, while 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) used as a component of contraceptive pills has been identified in ground and tap water samples [26].
The presence of human and veterinary pharmaceuticals and their residues into the environment has impelled the introduction of different risk assessment guidelines in the European Union by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) and in the USA by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the European Commission guideline [27], a medicinal product for human use must be accompanied by environmental risk assessment data. The EMEA has released a guideline for the assessment of potential environmental risks in 2006 [28]. According to the US FDA guidelines for the risk assessments of human drugs, applicants have to provide an environmental assessment report when the expected concentration of the active pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment is ≥1 μg/l [29]. Additionally, the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) issued a guidance document “Guidance for Industry for the Submission of an Environmental Assessment in Human Drug Application and Supplements” in 1995 [30]. In case of veterinary medicines, environmental risk assessments have been required in the USA since about 1980 and Europe since 1997 [31].
The need for a practical approach in gathering data on the environmental toxic effects of pharmaceuticals has been identified by the European Union Commission’s scientific committee on toxicity, ecotoxicity, and environment (CSTEE). The four classes of special environmental feature-specific concerns, which are stereotypically not evaluated in traditional ecotoxicity testing under EU directive 1488/94 [28] are antibiotics [resistance issue], antineoplastics [mutagenicity], sex hormones [endocrine disruption], and cardiovascular high potential hazard. Therefore, it is acknowledged that a prioritization technique needs to be developed for environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals, and this should follow the general scheme for chemicals according to the REACH guidelines [27], where the implication of in silico methods specifically the quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) method is stressed.
In this perspective, to make the information regarding ecotoxicity of diverse pharmaceuticals available, different government and nongovernment regulatory authorities are recommending the application of fast and economical in silico methods for prediction of the elementary physicochemical and fate properties of pharmaceuticals as well as their ecological and direct human health effects before they reach into market for usage. Computer-aided toxicity models allow for the effects of pharmaceuticals (physicochemical properties, toxicological activity, distribution, fate, etc.) to be easily predicted. These predictions may be obtained from the knowledge of chemical structure alone, provided that the structure can be described in two or three dimensions. Employing these methods, ecotoxicity information on pharmaceuticals may be obtained without toxicity testing, and/or even before synthesis of the compound. Therefore, use of QSAR as one of the non-experimental methods is significant in order to lessen time, animal usage and cost involvement in design, development, and discovery process of drugs and/or pharmaceuticals.
There is a significant lack of knowledge about the environmental fate of a huge number of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites. On the contrary, only a limited number of in silico models have been developed so far to predict the risk of pharmaceuticals to the environment. This chapter aims to provide information regarding occurrence of pharmaceuticals and their residues in the environment, their persistence, environmental fate, and toxicity as well as application of in silico methods to predict risk and fate properties of pharmaceuticals to the environment. Concise ideas about ecotoxicity endpoints, available ecotoxicity databases and expert systems employed for rapid ecotoxicity predictions of pharmaceuticals are discussed in this chapter.
2 Ecotoxicity of Pharmaceuticals: A General Overview
2.1 Source and Entry Routes
Identification of proper sources and routes of entry of pharmaceuticals into diverse environmental compartments is the first step to get a proper view of the ecotoxicity problem due to pharmaceuticals. The most obvious and common pathways for environmental contamination of pharmaceuticals are discussed below.
-
(a)
Urine and feces: Major and most common entry routes for pharmaceuticals into the environment are via urine and feces of the patients. Not only active ingredients, but also the metabolites are excreted through the urine and feces as many drugs are metabolized into hydrophilic compounds for excretion. The risk of these metabolites is completely different from the parent drugs in majority of cases which make the risk assessment study more critical one.
-
(b)
Direct exposure of diagnostic compounds: Contrast media like diatrizoate, iohexol, iomeprol, and iopromide are used as diagnostic tools for capturing detailed X-ray images of soft tissues. Iodinated X-ray contrast media are highly hydrophilic substances which are extensively applied and eliminated without proper treatment; as a result they persist for a long time in the environment [32].
-
(c)
Household disposal: Either out-of-date or unwanted medicines are discarded through the sink/toilet or via waste collection, before being taken to landfill sites where they appear as terrestrial ecosystem contaminants. Less than 20 % users had ever been given instructions about medication dumping by a health care provider. In a study, causes for possessing unused medication were found to be due to an alteration of medication by the doctor (48.9 %), or self-discontinuation (25.8 %) [33]. The most common method of disposal was to throw unused medicines in the trash (76.5 %) or flush them down the drain (11.2 %) [33].
-
(d)
Manufacturers: According to the regulation of the Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), the active pharmaceutical emissions during manufacturing have been thought to be insignificant. But recently it has been found that in Asian countries concentrations up to several milligrams per liter can be found in effluents for single compounds [34].
-
(e)
Hospital influent and effluent: Point sources such as hospital effluents are likely to be another significant source. There are up to 16 pharmaceuticals including antiepileptics and anti-inflammatories which were found in the hospital waste water according to a study [35]. Several studies suggested the existence of the pharmaceuticals in the effluent and influent of the sewage treatment plants and it was proved that the elimination of the pharmaceuticals is partial [35].
-
(f)
Animal husbandry and veterinary medicine: Veterinary medicines and their metabolites are also excreted through urine and feces. Apart from the potential for direct soil contamination, there is also the risk of run-off with heavy rain, thus potentially contaminating both the surrounding surface and groundwater. Other sources include direct application in aqua farming, manure run-off, run-off from the application of sewage sludge and manure on farmland as fertilizers, or, finally, via landfill leaching [36].
-
(g)
Aquaculture: Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) sludge is habitually employed as fertilizer on agricultural land which is a rich source of non-suspected drugs [37]. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), antibiotics have been utilized in aquaculture primarily for therapeutic purposes and as prophylactic agents. Antibiotics authorized for use in aquaculture are florfenicol, oxytetracycline, sarafloxacin, premix, erythromycin sulfonamides potentiated with ormethoprim, or trimethoprim [38].
-
(h)
Plant agriculture: Antibiotics are comprehensively employed to control bacterial diseases of plants. Streptomycin with oxytetracycline to a minor extent is very commonly used antibiotic in plant agriculture in controlling bacterial diseases of tree fruits. Primary uses are on apple, pear, and related fruit trees for the control of fire blight caused by Erwinia amylovora. According to a report, antibiotics applied to plants account for less than 0.5 % of total antibiotic use in the USA [39]. In Fig. 1, we have represented different sources, routes, fate of pharmaceuticals.
2.2 Occurrence
Pharmaceuticals are among the most common personal care products in day to day life. Medicines are regularly used in human and veterinary health care, farming, and aquaculture in the modern era. Country specific consumption for groups of drugs in defined daily doses (DDDs) can be found for Europe on the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC) homepage [40]. In the last decade, a large number of studies covering occurrence of pharmaceuticals in water bodies, sewage treatment plants, manure, soil, and air dust have been published. The most concerning issue is that under the environmental conditions, these molecules can be neutral, cationic, anionic, or zwitterionic which make the risk assessment study of pharmaceuticals more difficult. In Table 1 we have presented the reported concentrations of diverse pharmaceuticals from various therapeutic classes in different samples of different countries and probable ecotoxicity data to particular toxicological endpoints [3, 41–68].
2.2.1 Waterbodies
The presence of pharmaceuticals in the various waterbodies in the environment has been quite extensively studied by different research groups. Quinolones (predominantly ciprofloxacin) and other pharmaceuticals have been detected in the effluent of hospitals up to a low μg/l range. Another study reveals that β-lactams (including penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams, β-lactamase inhibitors) were detected in the lower μg/l range in hospital effluent and in the influent of a municipal STP [69]. NSAIDs have the higher concentrations recorded in surface water, ranging between 0.4 ng/l and 15 μg/l, diclofenac, paracetamol, and ibuprofen being the most quantitatively found [70]. Drugs like caffeine with a maximum concentration of 6 μg/l and sulfamethoxazole with 1.9 μg/l in the USA, carbamazepine up to 1.3 μg/l in Germany and in Canada, gemfibrozil up to 790 ng/l, ranitidine up to 580 ng/l, atenolol with 241 ng/l in Italy, and metformin up to 150 ng/l are detected in surface water [71]. In the effluent of WWTP and STP, the concentrations of estrogenic compounds usually are below 50 ng/l, but there are unexpected high concentrations of estriol and 17α-estradiol (about 590 ng/l and 180 ng/l respectively) found in the USA [72].
2.2.2 Manure and Soil
Antibiotics have been detected in soil in concentrations in the mg/kg range [73]. Generally, the concentrations of pharmaceuticals detected in the soils are quite low when compared with that of pharmaceuticals in water resource. According to the literature, the six most common pharmaceuticals found in soil are the antibacterials (trimethoprim, sulfadiazine, and triclosan), analgesics (ibuprofen and diclofenac) and antiepileptic (Carbamazepine). Extensive studies have detected tetracyclines and sulfonamides in liquid manure at concentrations of up to 20 and 40 mg/l, respectively. Antibiotics like virginiamycin, sarafloxacin, tetracycline, oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline, and cyclosporine A have quite slow biodegradability in soil. Tylosin disappeared soon after the application of manure. Hamscher et al. [74] detected tetracycline and chlortetracycline in 10 out of 12 soil samples. The highest average concentration of 86.2 μg/kg (0–10 cm), 198.7 μg/kg (10–20 cm), 171.7 μg/kg (20–30 cm) tetracycline, and 4.6–7.3 μg/kg (in all three sublayers) chlortetracycline were found. Carbamazepine is the most frequent compound detected in soil among five studies [75].
2.2.3 Air Dust
Several comprehensive reports have been published on environmental concentrations of antibiotics in dust originating from a pig-fattening house [76]. In a large-scale pig production, veterinary antibiotics are hugely used. This production system is represented as a considerable source of dust.
2.3 Effects
2.3.1 Antibiotics
Pharmaceuticals may have potential adverse effects on aquatic and terrestrial organisms by directly reaching into the environment. Organisms like bacteria, fungi, and microalgae are primarily affected as antibiotics are designed to inhibit the microorganisms. Antibiotics have the potential to affect the microorganisms in sewage systems and waste water treatment plant too. The inhibition of wastewater bacteria may seriously affect organic matter degradation and nitrification process which is a vital step in wastewater purification and elimination of toxic ammonia [77]. Lincomycin showed significant inhibition of the nitrification activity [78]. Ciprofloxacin was found to be active against Vibrio fischeri at a concentration of 5 mg/l [79]. Thomulka and McGee [80] have performed two bioassays to evaluate the toxicity of antibiotics like novobiocin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, ampicillin, and streptomycin to Vibrio harveyi, and approximately no toxic effects were identified after short incubation times where the employed endpoint was luminescence. Common receptors have been identified in plants for a number of antibiotics affecting transcription and translation (tetracyclines, macrolides, lincosamides, aminoglycosides, and pleuromutilins), metabolic pathways such as folate biosynthesis (sulfonamides), chloroplast replication (fluoroquinolones), and fatty acid biosynthesis (triclosan) [81].
Antimicrobials can affect the degradation of organic matter in large extent as well as have effects upon sediment’s microbial community [82]. Strong inhibitory effects on several bacteria and diminution in the length of the hyphae of lively molds in forest soil have been observed when antibiotics are added in concentrations of 10 mg/kg soil. A transitory effect on sulfate reduction was detected when antibiotics were mixed to sediment [83]. Allergic risks may arise from the high exposure of antibiotics dust particle in the air. Tylosin and sulfamethazine, which occurred in 80 % and 65 % of the samples respectively, are drugs with known allergic potential. Therefore, the high incidence of the asthma disease occurred among children living on farms. A survey on dust in pig fattening buildings in Europe exposed an average concentration of inhalable airborne dust of 2.2 mg/m3 [84]. Chloramphenicol is extensively employed in farming resulting in severe hazardous effects including myelosuppression to farmers; that is why it was totally banned for food-producing animals within the EU and the USA in 1994 [85].
Another important aspect is the emergence of resistance due to enormous application of antibiotics in human medicine, veterinary medicine, and animal husbandry. Resistance is one of the most concerning issue in medical field due to its accumulating and accelerating nature. On the contrary, the techniques combating resistance are diminishing in power and number. Antibiotics in sub-inhibitory concentrations can have an influence on cell functions and modify the genetic expression of virulence factors or the transfer of antibiotic resistance. The most prominent medical examples are vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and multiresistant pseudomonads [86].
2.3.2 Analgesics and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
Cleuvers [45] evaluated that acute toxicities of NSAIDs were relatively low, with half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) values obtained using Daphnia in the range from 68 to 166 mg/l and from 72 to 626 mg/l in the algal test. With EC50 values of 23.6 mg/l (ibuprofen), 23.8 mg/l (diclofenac), and 38.2 mg/l (naproxen), chronic ecotoxicity was somewhat higher, but still the values are far above the concentrations detected in surface water. A prominent confirmation of diclofenac residues in dead cattle has been observed in Pakistan [87]. Only in Germany, in 2002, 93.5 million prescriptions for NSAIDs were made with a transaction volume of about 1562 million Euros [88]. Due to higher usage and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs can reach considerable (up to >1 μg/l) concentrations in the environment. Few NSAIDs are detected in very low doses even in drinking water. Reports suggested the presence a concerning amount of diclofenac and ibuprofen in Swiss lakes and rivers, as well as in water bodies from the UK, Spain, Brazil, Greece, and the USA [15].
Diclofenac seems to be the compound having the highest acute toxicity with the effective concentrations below 100 mg/l within the class of NSAIDs. Short-term acute toxicity was analyzed in algae and invertebrates, phytoplankton was found to react more sensitively [lowest EC50 (96 h) = 14.5 mg/l] than zooplankton [lowest EC50 (96 h) = 22.43 mg/l] [89]. Diclofenac is commonly found in wastewater at median concentration of 0.81 μg/l whereas the maximal concentration in wastewater and surface water is up to 2 μg/l [90]. Acetylsalicylic acid affected reproduction in D. magna and D. longispina at concentrations of 1.8 mg/l [90]. Water flea Daphnia magna population growth rate was considerably reduced for concentrations ranging from 0 to 80 mg/l due to chronic toxicity of ibuprofen. Acute toxicity tests showed that naproxen had LC50 and EC50 values within the 1–100 mg/l range for the water flea Ceriodaphnia dubia, the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus, and the fairy shrimp Thamnocephalus platyurus. But the most sensitive reported species was D. magna for which EC50 values were 30.1 or 50 mg/l. Another most commonly prescribed NSAID is paracetamol which is present in concentration below to 20 ng/l to 4.3 μg/l in STP effluents; in surface waters, the values can reach 78.17 μg/l, which are values higher than the predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) of 9.2 μg/l [3]. Hence, paracetamol might represent a threat for nontarget organisms.
2.3.3 Blood Lipid-Lowering Agents
Statins have the capability to subdue synthesis of the juvenile hormone in insects and may also produce detrimental effect to protozoan parasites, inhibiting growth and development. Reports suggested that a proliferation of peroxisomes in rodent livers is caused by fibrates. Embryonic development of nontarget organisms that share these receptors can be stopped by simply inhibiting cellular differentiation. Fibrates present in the micromolar concentration range are sufficient to cause it in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and amphibians [3]. Quinn et al. [91] classified gemfibrozil as toxic (EC50 between 1 and 10 mg/l) and bezafibrate as harmful for nontarget organisms (EC50 between 10 and 100 mg/l).
Clofibrate is classified as harmful to aquatic organisms as it showed LC50 values in the range of 7.7–39.7 mg/l. The fish Gambusia holbrooki [LC50 (96 h) = 7.7 mg/l] seems to be the most sensitive organism to acute clofibrate concentrations [92]. Clofibrate has an immunosuppressive action in mammalian hosts, suppressing the production of IgM but not IgE antibodies, allowing an amplified number of encysted larvae of the nematodes T. spiralis and Trichinella nelsoni to occur and a decrease in the rate of exclusion of adult worms from the intestines, although the effects differed between parasite species and host strain [93]. Fibrates have been assessed by conventional toxicity tests and the following no-observed-effect-concentration (NOEC) were found for clofibric acid in C. dubia [NOEC (7 days) = 640 μg/l], the rotifer B. calyciflorus [NOEC (2 days) = 246 μg/l], and in early life stages of zebrafish [NOEC (10 days) = 70 mg/l] [94]. Clofibrate was observed to produce no effect on in vitro growth of T. bruceii but did reduce the incidence of P. berghei and the invasiveness and development of Acanthomoeba culbertsoni in exposed mammalian hosts [95]. Lovastatin hinders the egg production of the trematode S. mansoni and subsequently there is a decline in pathogenic granulomas typically associated with the eggs in the mammalian liver [96].
2.3.4 Beta-blockers
Beta-blockers act by competitive inhibition of beta-adrenergic receptors which is critical for normal functioning in the sympathetic branch of the vertebrate autonomic nervous system. Among beta-blockers, propranolol shows the highest acute toxicity and highest log K ow which proves the fact that it is a strong membrane stabilizer than other examined beta-blockers [97]. Undefined antagonists such as propranolol may be active in fish as they contain β2-receptors in heart and liver as well as in reproductive tissues [98]. There is a prominent evidence that propranolol not only has chronic cardiovascular toxicity, but also has toxic effect on reproduction system. The NOEC and lowest-observed-effect-concentration (LOEC) of propranolol affecting reproduction in C. dubia were 125 and 250 μg/l, and reproduction was affected after 27 days of exposure in H. azteca at 100 μg/l [97].
Beta-blockers may also affect parasite functional biology. Aqueous exposure of propranolol may negatively affect swimming behavior, survival, and phototaxis of free living aquatic stages of trematodes. Propranolol may also considerably decrease the number of Dirofilaria immitis nematode larvae capable of finishing third-stage molt, and in vitro prevent the growth of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum [99]. Fathead minnows exposed to atenolol throughout embryo-larval growth showed NOEC and LOEC values for growth rate of 3.2 mg/l and 10 mg/l, respectively [3]. At 48-h exposure to propranolol, LC50 values of 29.8, 1.6, and 0.8 mg/l were obtained for H. azteca, D. magna, and C. dubia, respectively, while acute exposure to nadolol did not affect the survival of the invertebrates [3]. Encystment of the protozoan Entamoeba invadens was inhibited in the presence of metoprolol [100].
2.3.5 Antineoplastic Drugs
Antineoplastic drugs are designed to kill the proliferating cells in cancer. As a consequence, a parallel effect can be expected on normally growing eukaryotic organisms. It is expected that antineoplastic drugs possess mutagenic, genotoxic, teratogenic, carcinogenic, and fetotoxic properties, and 14–53 % of the administered drugs can be excreted in unchanged form through urine [101]. Methotrexate revealed teratogenicity for fish embryos with an EC50 of 85 mg/l after 48 h of exposure and acute effects in the ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis with an EC50 for 48 h of 45 mg/l [102]. Due to immunosuppressant property, methotrexate and cyclophosphamide are reported to cause a proliferation in disease incidence and intensity in host–parasite systems [103]. Acute toxicity of methotrexate is reported on highly proliferative species like the ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis [EC50 (48 h) = 45 mg/l] [104]. On the contrary, cyclophosphamide appears to have a little effect on them. Methotrexate has been shown to have no or little effect on certain protozoans including Toxoplasma gondii, Babesia bovis, and Leishmania tropica, perhaps as they have different mechanisms of drug metabolism [105]. Development and growth of helminths in both mammalian and bird hosts were detrimentally effected by methotrexate and cyclophosphamide. Abnormal teratogenicity was noticed in fish embryos at higher concentrations [EC50 (48 h) = 85 mg/l]. Biomphalaria glabrata, a freshwater snail is largely affected with the long-term exposure to methotrexate [106]. Doxorubicin, tamoxifen, and methotrexate have all been reported as effective parasiticide agents against many protozoan species [107].
2.3.6 Neuroactive Compounds (Antiepileptics, Antidepressants)
A very limited number of studies on the effects of neurological agents on host–parasite dynamics have been studied, despite phenothiazine has been used as a parasiticide for long time [108]. The serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine is deceptively the most acute toxic human pharmaceutical with toxicity ranging from EC50 (48 h, alga) = 0.024 mg/l to LC50 (48 h) = 2 mg/l so far [2]. Sertraline exhibits highly toxic properties to rainbow trout (LC50 of 0.38 mg/l) at a 96-h exposure [109]. SSRIs were also tested on algae by evaluating the growth inhibition induced. Chronic toxicity tests proved that the organisms were sensitive with NOEC values below 1 mg/l [110]. C. vulgaris was shown to be the least sensitive species for all SSRIs tested. Fluvoxamine provided escalation to the highest EC50 values for all algae species tested (3563–10,208 μg/l).
Under the category of benzodiazepines, diazepam and nitrazepam were identified to increase the number of microfilariae of Setavia cervi liberated from the lungs into the peripheral blood circulation in rats [111]. Caffeine was found to stimulate the growth of Plasmodium gallinaceum and P. falciparum, while the antipsychotic haloperidol and the mood stabilizer valproic acid effectively inhibited the in vitro growth of T. gondii [112]. Diazepam and carbamazepine (antiepileptics) are classified as potentially detrimental to aquatic organisms as most of the acute toxicity data are below 100 mg/l. Conventional toxicity studies showed chronic toxicity of carbamazepine in C. dubia [NOEC (7 days) = 25 μg/l], in the rotifer B. calyciflorus [NOEC (2 days) = 377 μg/l], and in early life stages of zebrafish [NOEC (10 days) = 25 mg/l] [94]. Carbamazepine is carcinogenic to rats but does not have mutagenic properties in mammals [113]. It is also lethal to zebrafish at the 43 μg/l level and produces sublethal changes in Daphnia sp. at 92 μg/l [113]. Growth of D. magna was inhibited for concentrations of carbamazepine above 12.7 mg/l, showing acute toxicity at 17.2 mg/l [113].
2.3.7 Sex Hormones
Sex hormones are one of the extremely important biologically active compounds emerged as most serious aquatic environmental toxicants due to extensive use of human contraceptives. Exposure of mammalian hosts infected with the blood trematode S. mansoni to contraceptive pills resulted in a noteworthy modification in a range of liver cell’s ultrastructure and function. Ethinylestradiol (EE2) is a synthetic estrogen found in oral contraceptive pills with noticeable estrogenic effects in fish. The life-cycle exposure of fathead minnows to EE2 concentrations below 1 ng/l produced a noteworthy decline in fertilization success, an increased egg production and decreased expression of secondary male sex characteristics. Life-long exposure of zebrafish to 5 ng/l to EE2 has led to reproductive failure due to the nonexistence of secondary male sex characteristics [63]. Exposure to 17β-estradiol caused an increased susceptibility to the protozoan T. gondii in mice, while increased pathology occurred in mammals infected with Leishmania mexicana amazonensis and exposed to either estradiol or testosterone [114]. Estradiol increased the susceptibility of cyprinids to hemoflagellates by the suppression of lymphocyte proliferation [115]. At relatively high concentrations, hydrocortisone can cause an increase in the intensity of ectoparasitic infections in fish.
2.3.8 Antiparasitic Compounds
A study was performed on farms in the UK and the report suggested that concentrations of antiparasitic compounds of 0.112 mg/kg (doramectin) to 1.85 (ivermectin) mg/kg in dung were found. On the contrary, in same place, concentrations of these drugs in soil were considerably lower up to 0.046 mg/kg [116]. In a study performed in Slovenia, it was found that high concentrations of abamectin and doramectin were found in feces (0.2–0.8 mg/kg and 0.4–1.2 mg/kg, respectively) during the first 20 days after treatment, reaching concentrations of about 0.2 mg/kg after 70 and 50 days, respectively [117]. Grønvold et al. [118] found that ivermectin and fenbendazole affect the survival of the nematode Pristionchus maupasi at concentrations higher than 3 mg dung/kg (w/w) and 10–20 mg dung/kg, respectively. Svendsen et al. [119] showed that ivermectin and the fenbendazole did not affect earthworms. However, the disappearance of dung was affected by the avermectin but not by the fenbendazole. Avermectin B1A with LC50 value of 17.1 mg/kg in soil was found with the compost worm Eisenia fetida [120]. Eprinomectin did not affect survival or biomass of the earthworm species Lumbricus terrestris in laboratory tests at concentrations up to 0.43 mg/kg dung (w/w) or 3.3 mg/kg dung [121].
2.3.9 Antivirals
Tamiflu [oseltamivir ethylester-phosphate (OP)] and Relenzas (zanamivir) belong to a novel class of antiviral drugs under the neuraminidase inhibitors category. National storing of neuraminidase inhibitors in the USA began with the emergence of the 2009 influenza pandemic (H1N1) [122]. Tamiflu tablet largely dominated Relenza (disk inhaler) due to its relative ease of administration. Tamiflu is a prodrug, which is converted to the active drug oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) in the liver. About 80 % of an oral dose of Tamiflu is excreted as OC in the urine and the remaining portions are excreted as OP in the feces. Therefore, both the parent chemical and its bioactive metabolite eventually are projected to reach a mean of 2–12 mg/l in WWTPs during a moderate and severe pandemic [122]. Current evidences suggested that rivers receiving WWTP effluent would also be exposed to OC throughout a pandemic. The OC concentrations between 293 and 480 ng/l have been recorded in rivers receiving WWTP effluent during the 2009 pandemic [123].
2.3.10 Pharmaceuticals Mixtures
Pharmaceuticals are identified as multicomponent mixtures rather than isolated pure substance in diverse environmental compartments. Majority of pharmaceuticals will either be transformed by physical and chemical means and/or subsequently biotransformed by some organisms. Multicomponent mixtures are the foremost concerning issue for the ecotoxicity. The following characteristics also make their joint toxic effects a major issue for hazard and risk assessment:
-
1.
The toxicity of a mixture has always a synergistic effect than the effects produced by a single component.
-
2.
A mixture can have a substantial ecotoxicity, even if all components exist only in low concentrations that do not aggravate noteworthy toxic effects if acting separately on the exposed systems.
A combination of fluoxetine and clofibric acid is lethal for more than 50 % of a water-flea (Daphnia) population after an exposure of 6 days, although the individual drugs did not show any significant effect when present separately at same concentrations [124]. A substantial swing in sex ratio was perceived after an exposure to a three-component mixture of erythromycin, triclosan, and trimethoprim. Again, individual components did not elicit significant individual effects. These studies are very important to show that mixture effects have to be taken into consideration to identify the effects of pharmaceuticals.
2.4 The Environmental Risk Assessment
Exposure assessment is the procedure of determining or assessing the intensity, frequency, and extent of environment and human exposure to an existing pharmaceutical product, or of estimating theoretical exposure that might rise from the discharge of new pharmaceuticals into the environment. The concept of “exposomics,” which integrates a top-down and bottom-up approach to identification of relevant exposure biomarkers, will be an important component of future exposure science [125]. The major aims of environmental risk assessment (ERA) should be risk mitigation and risk management. In order to alleviate or accept risks, a risk assessment has to be performed both for products and for activities followed by generation of report based on the characteristics of the product, its possible environmental exposure, fate and effects, and risk extenuation strategies. The inference of the report should be based on sound scientific reasoning supported by adequate studies. If other applicable data are accessible, they should also be submitted.
The outline of the registration process and the ERA consist of European Commission and Council directives and regulations on registration, European policy, case law, and global (trade) agreements. The decision-making process and the risk models should elevate the expenses to society in terms of ecotoxicity and financial loss. Also the assessment method itself should obstruct neither product development nor timely action to eradicate hazards.
2.4.1 Risk Assessment Approaches
The most commonly employed approaches for risk assessment are hazard identification, dose-response assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization of pharmaceuticals and its metabolites in various environment compartment [126].
Hazard Identification
The first step for risk assessment is hazard identification which supports the intensity of risk for a particular product. Although in vitro test studies provide useful data on the toxicity of environmental hazards, the majority of scientists rely heavily on the outcome of animal toxicity tests for hazard identification. As a consequence, a greater stress should be provided on the implication of in vitro assays in human cells and QSAR analysis, as well as the use of computational techniques in systems biology [127].
Dose-Response Assessment
Identification of the threshold dose of the toxic effect of any product is very much essential for scientific risk assessment. Dose-response information over a wide range of test concentrations should be assessed employing Quantitative high throughput screening (q-HTS). There should be availability of sensitive assays capable of detecting toxicity at very low doses or below environmental levels experienced by human populations. Statistical approaches can be used to estimate yardstick concentrations for adaptive and adversarial responses and to assess critical concentrations [128]. As discussed in subheading “Hazard Identification”, the extrapolation techniques will be required to interpret in vitro test results to in vivo utilizing an appropriate internal tissue dose metric [129].
Dose and Species Extrapolation
The major problems of risk assessment are low-dose and interspecies extrapolation. In silico models and expert systems have supported such extrapolations, including linear and threshold models for low-dose extrapolation and body weight or surface area alterations for interspecies extrapolation. New extrapolation complications are dose extrapolation of molecular and cellular pathway responses, and extrapolation from the short-term in vitro to longer term in vivo exposure. In vitro to in vivo extrapolation and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are amenable to sensitivity, variability, and uncertainty analysis employing conventional tools [130]. Computational biology systems will back the application of tools for determining variability and uncertainty from the pharmacologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) information as the pathway components imitate more targeted molecular elements and their interactions [131].
Exposure Assessment
In present scenario, human exposure assessment is made principally on the measured levels of environmental agents in the human environment [132]. In few cases, internal dose measures may also be calculated using biomonitoring [133] or pharmacokinetic modeling [134]. For superior exposure assessment, the focus should be more on direct measures of critical toxicity pathway agitations in humans by employing innovative biomonitoring techniques coupled with advanced new high throughput approaches [135].
2.4.2 Environmental Risk Assessment Modeling of Pharmaceuticals
The risk assessment model consists of the risk assessment process, including their harmonization and communication with the risk management process. The risk model interprets the safety issues in quantities like probabilities, concentrations, dosages, and risk quotients of each pharmaceutical product. The simplest approaches to estimating concentrations of a pharmaceutical in diverse compartments are provided in the guidance for environmental assessments for regulatory drug approvals by the US FDA [30] or the EU EMA [28]. In Fig. 2, the risk assessment is harmonized with risk management process.
Before designing or modeling a toxicological study, it is very beneficial to assess exposure of any pharmaceutical by the following way [136]:
-
The exposure is measured in form of the environmental concentration (occurrence) to which the biological system is exposed, the duration and frequency being not on the concentrations to which each individual is actually exposed. The actual exposure is subjected to many other factors such as, the fate, sorption effects, metabolism and transformation processes.
-
The life stage and behavioral patterns should also be taken into account for any organism or living system.
-
The bioavailability and toxicokinetics of the drug are studied.
-
The pathways and target sites in the biological system are explored.
-
The mode of action which depicts steps and processes to molecular and functional effects is determined.
-
As pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics can influence the dose of pharmaceuticals, one has to consider these aspects to assess the dose which ultimately reaches the environment taking into account possible absorption, distribution, and elimination mechanisms.
-
The hazard due to the inherent toxicity of the pharmaceutical according to its chemical properties is also studied.
2.5 Risk Management
Risk management is “the process of identifying, evaluating, selecting, and implementing actions to reduce risk to human health and to ecosystems. The goal of risk management is scientifically sound, cost-effective, integrated actions that reduce or prevent risks while taking into account social, cultural, ethical, political, and legal considerations” [137]. For eco-friendly risk management, one may select a combination of apposite tactics to balance risks, costs and benefits, taking into account social values and economic considerations.
2.5.1 Implementation of Precautionary Measures
The application of pharmaceuticals and their after use toxic effects cannot be stopped but the probable risk of pharmaceutical products related to environmental can be controlled by implementing proper precaution and safety measures. The EMEA 2006 guideline demonstrates following steps as safety measures for risk management:
-
1.
Calculation of product risks initially
-
2.
Proper product labeling and summary product characteristics (SPC)
-
3.
Package leaflet (PL) for each pharmaceutical for patient use to inform the probable toxic effects
-
4.
Appropriate and safe storage of pharmaceutical product
-
5.
Safe and proper scientific disposal of pharmaceuticals
2.5.2 Lessening the Input of Pharmaceuticals into the Environment
To diminish the occurrence of pharmaceuticals into the different compartments of the environment, one has to follow the principle of sustainability where the entire life cycle of a pharmaceutical has to be taken into consideration to categorize the opportunities for risk management. For diminishing the input of pharmaceuticals into the environment, following steps can employed effectively [138].
Training and Awareness
The most important step to reduce the occurrence of pharmaceuticals in the environment is proper training and awareness of users who are the major source points. A proper usage and disposal of pharmaceutical is the responsibility of the shareholders and people using the compounds, including patients, doctors and nurses, and pharmacists. Industrial sectors should have the major role to treat the failed active pharmaceutical under quality control category properly before it reach to the environment. Additionally, each pharmaceutical product should consist of materials safety data sheet (MSDS) intended to provide workers and emergency personnel with procedures for handling or working with that substance in a safe manner, information such as physical data, toxicity, health effects, first aid, reactivity, storage, disposal, protective equipment, and spill-handling procedures. Appropriate and effective risk management strategies need basic knowledge of entry routes of pharmaceuticals. Therefore, one has to identify the bulk of drug flows connected with the diverse sources of pharmaceuticals such as households, industries, hospitals and pharmacy.
Improved Sewage Treatment
The most technical and extensively considered approach for risk management is improvement of sewage treatment. Analyzing Table 1, one can easily identify the presence of threatening amount of pharmaceutical wastes after sewage and waste water treatment also. The purpose of advanced and improved sewage and waste water treatment is to further reduce the ecotoxicity, hormonal effects and pathogenic effects of the effluent. In recent years, advanced effluent treatment has been studied extensively. The advanced treatment of sewage influents and effluents as well as waste water treatment can be done employing photochemical oxidation processes, filtration, and application of powdered charcoal and constructed wetlands [139].
Green and Sustainable Pharmacy
The third approach is evolving from the knowledge of green and sustainable pharmacy which states that substitution of the compound with a more environmentally benign compound [138]. Though this approach is less practiced, in terms of sustainability, it appears to be the most encouraging one in the long run. The prime principle of green chemistry is easy and fast degradability of pharmaceuticals after their application. Understanding of full life cycle of drugs will lead to a different understanding of the functionality necessary for a pharmaceutical.
Additionally, other crucial issues like (a) development of improved drug delivery systems so that lower doses are required; (b) upgradation of packaging and package sizes to prolong shelf life and lessen the amount of the product that expires and rejection of unused products; and (c) changes in prescription and animal farming practices are substantial options for minimizing or eliminating emissions to the environment. Potential processes and measures to decrease the environmental toxicity by carious stakeholders are addressed in Fig. 3 for a better understanding.
3 Regulatory Agencies for the Risk Assessment and Management of Ecotoxicity Pharmaceuticals
Immense exposure of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites to the environment is a matter of concern and a burning global issue at recent times. The risk effects are not only related with the environment, it is also directly related to human health to a large extent. As a consequence, release of these pharmaceutical products, their risk assessment as well as risk management are controlled and regulated at local, national and international levels by different governments and regulatory agencies worldwide. As experimental data of environmental fate and toxicity of pharmaceuticals are absent or some time not sufficient, there is a strong urge to predict physical and chemical properties, environmental fate, ecological effects and health effects of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites. Several government organizations have been applying the approaches of structure–activity relationship (SAR) and QSAR to develop the predictions for untested existing as well as newly introduced pharmaceuticals. To establish proper identification of environmental hazards, their risk assessment and fate modeling, SAR and QSAR approaches along with other predictive in silico tools are employed by Australian, Canadian, Danish, European, German, Japanese, Dutch, and US Government organizations [28, 30, 140–144].
QSAR models can be generated for prediction of the following ecotoxicity related properties or effects:
-
1.
Physicochemical properties
-
2.
Toxic potential and potency
-
3.
Environmental distribution and fate in different compartments (air, water and soil) of environment
-
4.
Biokinetic processes (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites
Areas where QSARs can be applied by governmental regulatory agencies are as follows:
-
1.
Prioritization of existing pharmaceuticals for toxicity testing to environment.
-
2.
Classification and labeling of new pharmaceuticals according to their safe use.
-
3.
Risk assessment of new and existing pharmaceuticals.
-
4.
Guiding experimental design of regulatory tests or testing strategies.
-
5.
Providing mechanistic information
-
6.
Filling up the large data gaps.
-
7.
Building a proper database of each pharmaceutical to different species regarding environmental toxicity.
-
8.
Development of expert systems for each therapeutic classes for different compartments of the environment.
-
9.
Construction of efficient interspecies models to extrapolate data from one species to another species when data of a particular species is absent.
Global regulatory authorities and agencies [28, 30, 140–144] for the risk identification, risk assessment and finally risk management of ecotoxicity pharmaceuticals are listed in Table 2.
The most common endpoints associated with various test methods proposed under Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) are the following ones:
-
Physical-chemical properties: Most commonly evaluated properties are melting point, boiling point, vapor pressure, octanol–water partition coefficient, organic carbon–water partition coefficient, and water solubility.
-
Ecological effects on endpoints: Acute fish-toxicity, long-term toxicity, acute Daphnia toxicity, algal toxicity, terrestrial toxicity, marine organism toxicity, microorganism toxicity in sewage treatment plant.
-
Environmental fate: Biodegradation, hydrolysis in water, atmospheric oxidation, and bioaccumulation;
-
Human health effects: Acute oral, acute dermal, acute inhalation, eye irritation, skin irritation, skin sensitization, repeated dose toxicity, genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, etc.
OECD’s database on risk assessment models:
In silico models that are employed by the OECD countries to predict health or environmental hazards, exposure potential, and probable effects were organized into a searchable database. This database is intended as an information resource only. The models are listed by countries and by the property or effect included. The models can be useful as a screening tool, when there is a lacking of chemical-specific data, for establishing priorities for chemical assessment and for identifying issues of potential concern [140]. Areas of assessment and category of information for predicting human health and environment according to OECD’s guidelines are represented in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively.
4 In Silico Modeling of Ecotoxicity Using SAR and QSAR Approaches
The toxic potential of large quantities of industrial chemicals including pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, pesticides and other synthetic or semisynthetic chemicals is often required to be assessed by using standard animal models, comprising the basic test protocol for risk assessments for their approval as a registered product to launch into the market. With increasing concern about the environmental pollution and human health, the manufacture, storage, distribution, and release of these hazardous substances after their application to the environment are controlled and regulated at various levels by different governments and regulatory agencies worldwide. Applications of analogues, SAR and QSAR of different pharmaceuticals are also providing useful information in a regulatory decision making context in the absence of experimental data [140]. Most commonly employed predictive in silico tools are depicted in Fig. 6.
Among the available in silico predictive models for ecotoxicity, majority of the models are constructed employing QSAR techniques. Therefore, in this book chapter, a special importance is given to the discussion of QSAR models. The QSAR approach attempts to correlate structural/molecular properties with biological activities/toxicities, for a set of compounds by means of statistical methods. As a result, a simple mathematical relationship is established:
Applications of QSAR can be extended to any molecular design purpose, prediction of different kinds of biological activities and toxicities, lead compound optimization, classification, diagnosis, and elucidation of mechanisms of drug action, toxicity prediction of environmental toxicants (pollutant pharmaceuticals, chemicals, gas, etc.), and prediction of drug-induced toxicity [145]. The major objective of structure–activity/toxicity relationship modeling is to investigate and identify the decisive factors for the measured activity/toxicity for a particular system, in order to have an insight of the mechanism and behavior of the studied system. For such a purpose, the employed strategy is to generate a mathematical model that connects experimental measures with a set of chemical descriptors determined from the molecular structure for a set of compounds. The derived model should have as good predictive capabilities as possible to predict the studied biological/toxicological or physicochemical behavior for new compounds. The factors governing the events in a biological system are represented by a multitude of physicochemical descriptors, which can include parameters to account for hydrophobicity, electronic properties, steric effects, and topology, among others [145].
With the constant progress of QSAR techniques, many methods, algorithms, and techniques have been discovered and applied in QSAR studies. The development of a QSAR model follows five major steps:
-
1.
Selection of a dataset with series of known response data
-
2.
Calculation of descriptors
-
3.
Splitting of the dataset into training and test sets for model development and its subsequent validation
-
4.
Construction of models using different chemometric tools, and
-
5.
Validation of the developed model based on internal and external validation statistics
Additionally, the development of 3D-QSAR models includes two more steps for their successful execution: conformation analysis of the molecules and their alignment status with respect to the most active compound. The most important feature for an acceptable and reliable QSAR model is predictive capability for new set of compounds. The predictive quality of the developed model is determined based on different validation statistics. Thus, validation of QSAR models plays the most crucial role in defining the applicability of the QSAR model for the prediction of untested compounds. Initially, verification of the correlation between chemical features of the molecules and the biological activity/toxicity was of prime interest during the development of a QSAR model. Later, the focus gradually shifted toward the predictive power of the model than simply unveiling the quantitative relationships [146].
To validate a QSAR model, one has to follow OECD principles for acceptable predictions in order to make the model as a reliable screening tool for future toxicity prediction of untested pharmaceuticals. A meeting of QSAR experts held in Setúbal, Portugal in March 2002 reported guidelines for the validation of QSAR models for regulatory purposes. The OECD principles were agreed by OECD member countries, QSAR and regulatory communities at the 37th Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology in November 2004. These principles are listed here: Principle 1: a defined endpoint; Principle 2: an unambiguous algorithm; Principle 3: a defined domain of applicability; Principle 4: appropriate measures of goodness-of fit, robustness, and predictivity; Principle 5: a mechanistic interpretation, if possible [147]. Different quality metrics for QSAR models can be categorized into two classes: one determining the fitting ability of the model while the other analyzing the predictive potential of the developed model [146].
4.1 Why In Silico Models Should Be Developed for Ecotoxicity Predictions of Pharmaceuticals?
4.1.1 The 3R Concept
The 3R concept represents three words “Reduction,” “Replacement,” and “Refinement”. The concept brought about an imperative notification about animal experimentation in the scientific communities. The word ‘Reduction’ refers to the diminution in number of animals used to get results of a defined precision. Next, ‘Replacement’ corresponds to the use of nonliving resources to replace conscious living higher animals, and ‘Refinement’ means decline in the severity or cruelty of inhuman methodologies applied to the experimental animals [148]. As a consequence, to establish the 3R concept, in silico techniques are one of the front runners.
4.1.2 Ban of Animal Experimentation
There are different social as well as governmental organizations that consider reduction or complete ban of animal experimentations [149]. Here, we have listed a few of them:
-
1.
The European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) was established in the year 1991 that agrees the principle of 3Rs.
-
2.
The European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Procedures.
-
3.
Council Directive 86/609/EEC on the Approximation of Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Regarding the Protection of Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes.
-
4.
Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), a US based organization focussing on the reduction of animal experimentations.
-
5.
The testing ban on the finished cosmetic products applies since 11 September 2004; the testing ban on ingredients or combination of ingredients applies since 11 March 2009. The marketing ban applies since 11 March 2009 for all human health effects with the exception of repeated-dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, and toxicokinetics. For these specific health effects, the marketing ban applies since 11 March 2013, irrespective of the availability of alternative non-animal tests [150].
-
6.
India and Israel have also banned animal testing for cosmetic products, while the USA has no such ban in place [151].
-
7.
China is the only major market where testing all cosmetics on animals is required by law, and foreign companies distributing their products to China must also have them tested on animals. [152] China has announced that its animal testing requirement will be waived for shampoo, perfume, and other so-called “non-special use cosmetics” manufactured by Chinese companies after June 2014. “Special use cosmetics,” including hair regrowth, hair removal, dye and permanent wave products, antiperspirant, and sunscreen, will continue to warrant mandatory animal testing.
4.1.3 Regulatory Decision Making
SARs and QSARs are employed to predict aquatic toxicity, physical or chemical properties, and environmental fate parameters as well as to predict specific health effects of organic chemicals by Australian, Canadian, Danish, European, German, Japanese, Dutch, and US Government organizations.
4.1.4 Filling Data Gaps
Acceptable toxicity data of pharmaceuticals to environment and human health is considerably less than 5 % [153]. Computer-aided prediction has the competency to assist in the prioritization of pharmaceuticals for testing, and for predicting specific toxicities to allow for classification. As the number of reliable models for toxicity predictions is increasing, they can be employed as one of the major sources for filling the missing data of pharmaceutical toxicity to ecosystem.
4.1.5 Development of Understanding of Biology and Chemistry
In the modeling of acute toxicological endpoints, much has been gained regarding mechanisms of action. For many modeling approaches, it may be assumed that compounds fitting the same QSAR are acting by the same mechanism of action. This has allowed workers to define the chemical domain of certain mechanisms. There are countless examples where knowledge of biology and chemistry has been advanced by modeling in the field of toxicological and fate effects [154].
4.1.6 Cost and Time Reduction
Toxicity study is very costly in terms of the animals employed for testing and time taken. Even a simple ecotoxicological assay may cost several thousand dollars, and a 2-year carcinogenicity assay may cost several million dollars. Cost is a clear issue to fill the data gaps for the many new compounds that have not been tested. On the other hand, prediction of various toxicity endpoints for pharmaceuticals at an early stage of design can save a large amount of expenses for such compounds which may be found toxic at a later stage of drug development program [155].
4.1.7 Identification of New Toxicological Problems
The development of computational techniques not only allows for the prediction of the potential risk of pharmaceuticals but also allows for rational direction to be given to the testing programs.
5 Review of Literature on In Silico Ecotoxicity Modeling of Pharmaceuticals
Kar and Roy [156] have constructed robust quantitative interspecies toxicity correlation models for Daphnia magna and fish evaluating the ecotoxicity of structurally diverse 77 pharmaceuticals. They have demonstrated that the keto group and the
(aasC) fragment are principally responsible for higher toxicity of pharmaceuticals to D. magna. On the other hand, for fish toxicity, along with the keto group, structural fragments like X=C=X, R–C(=X)–X, and R–C≡X are largely responsible for the toxicity. The interspecies models were also used to predict fish toxicities of 59 pharmaceuticals (for which Daphnia toxicities were present) and Daphnia toxicities of 30 pharmaceuticals (for which fish toxicities were present). They established that the interspecies correlation study would permit an improved and inclusive risk assessment of pharmaceuticals for which toxicity data was missing for a particular endpoint.
Das et al. [157] attempted to develop interspecies correlation models taking rodent toxicity as dependent variable so that any drug without reported rodent toxicity can be predicted using fish, daphnia, or algae toxicity data which can be further extrapolated to human toxicity. Interspecies extrapolation QSAR models were developed employing multiple validation strategies. Analyzing the models, the authors concluded that heteroatom atom count and charge distribution were significant determinants of the rodent toxicity, and that the atom level log P contributions of various structural fragments and various extended topochemical atom (ETA) indices reflecting electronic information and branching pattern of molecules were important determinants for the rodent toxicity. In addition, from interspecies aquatic toxicity modeling, it was established that apart from the algae toxicity, atom level log P contributions of different fragments, charge distribution, shape, and ETA parameters were important in describing the daphnia and fish toxicities in the interspecies correlation models with algae toxicity. The toxicity of chemicals to rodents bears minimum interspecies correlation with other mentioned nonvertebrate and vertebrate toxicity endpoints.
The acute toxicity was predicted (>92 %) using a generic quantitative structure–toxicity relationship (QSTR) model developed by Sanderson and Thomsen [158] suggesting a narcotic mechanism of action (MOA) of 275 pharmaceuticals. An analysis of model prediction error suggests that 68 % of the pharmaceuticals have a nonspecific MOA. Authors have compared the measured effect data to the predicted effect concentrations using ECOSAR regarding the predictability of ecotoxicity of pharmaceuticals and accurate hazard categorization relative to Global Harmonized System (GHS). Molecules were predicted using the model resulting in 71 % algae, 74 % daphnia, 83 % fish datasets that could be compared.
Escher et al. [159] constructed QSAR models with the total toxic potential of mixtures of the β-blockers and related human metabolites for the phytotoxicity endpoint. They have assumed two scenarios for this study. In the first scenario, the metabolites lose their explicit activity and act as baseline toxicants. In the second scenario, the metabolites reveal the identical specific mode of action like their parent drug. β-Blockers are secondary amines and are, therefore, fully protonated at environmental pH. The authors accounted for their positive charge in the QSAR analysis and have experimentally determined the liposome–water partition ratios at pH 7 to make QSAR analysis more robust.
Berninger and Brooks [160] considered the mammalian Acute to Therapeutic Ratio (ATR) to predict pharmaceuticals which may result in comparatively high Acute to Chronic Ration (ACR) in fish models. The authors identified a statistically significant relationship between mammalian ATRs and fish ACRs (p < 0.001, r 2 = 0.846). In this model, they only included chronic responses of fish to pharmaceuticals which appear to have been elicited through a therapeutic MOA for calculating ACRs and for statistical analysis of the relationship with mammalian ATRs. Utilizing this approach, mammalian ATR values can be used for predicting pharmaceuticals with higher fish ACRs if the chronic response used in ACR calculation is reasonably linked to the therapeutic MOA of a pharmaceutical.
Sanderson et al. [161] employed the US EPA generic aquatic (Q)SAR model ECOSAR to screen more than 2800 pharmaceuticals and provided a baseline to fill the screening data regarding parent pharmaceuticals environmental toxicity. The model can be used to predict both acute and chronic aquatic toxicity.
Sanderson and Thomsen [162] overestimated the toxicity for 70 % of the 59 pharmaceuticals by ECOSAR v3.20 which contains both measured and modeled data. For the remaining 30 % pharmaceuticals, more than 94 % of the predictions underestimated toxicity by less than a factor of 10. This is an indication that a narcosis based model is conservative relative to experimental values around 70 % of the time, thus implying that for at least 70 % of the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs), the acute mode of action (MOA) can be elucidated by baseline toxicity. The authors have observed determination coefficients (r 2) ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 between all the modeled Log EC50 and Log K ow. The slopes of the Log EC50–Log K ow regressions based on measured data from the USA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) database for both fish and daphnia equal −0.86 which suggest a narcotic MOA.
Lienert et al. [163] assessed the ecotoxicological risk potential of 42 pharmaceuticals from 22 therapeutic classes, including metabolites formed in humans. They considered each parent drug and its metabolites as a mixture of equally acting compounds, and in case when effect data were missing, they estimated these with QSAR models. They have collected data on the identity and excretion pathways of human metabolites and, where available, experimental ecotoxicity data (EC/LC50) from pharmaceutical compilations and from diverse literature sources. They have compiled physicochemical data like structure, molecular weight, octanol–water partition coefficient Kow, acidity constant pK a mainly from the Physical Properties Database (http://www.syrres.com/esc/physprop.htm). Moreover, they have generated a risk quotient (RQmixture) using simple predictions of drug concentrations in wastewater which can be useful for risk assessment of pharmaceuticals.
Christen et al. [164] developed VirtualTox Lab [165] to predict the effects of pharmaceuticals in the aquatic system. The study leads to the inference that the mode of action perception is most appropriate for the identification of highly active compounds (HC). As suggested by the authors, modification can be done by balancing this concept by the QSAR model (VirtualTox Lab), whereas the fish plasma model seemed to be less apposite due to the requirement of environmental concentration above 10 ng/l for the identification of a risk. The practice of the VirtualTox Lab will support the mode of action concept and may be beneficial to recognize surplus targets of the pharmaceutical to assess the ecotoxicity.
Escher et al. [166] predicted baseline toxicity of the 100 molecules using established QSARs for algae, daphnia, and fish. The QSARs were selected from the Technical Guidance Document of the EU. The logarithm of D lipw (liposome water distribution coefficient) was employed in the model development for baseline toxicity to calculate the toxicity of the compound towards the stated species.
The environmental risk assessment of 26 pharmaceuticals and personal care products have been performed by De García et al. [167] based on the ecotoxicity values generated by bioluminescence and respirometry assays. Then the compounds were classified following the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals by predictions using the US EPA ecological structure–activity relationship (ECOSAR™). The real risk of impact of these pharmaceuticals in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and in the aquatic environment was predicted according to the criteria of the European Medicines Agency. According to their studies, in at least two ecotoxicity tests, 65.4 % of the PPCPs showed prominent toxicity to aquatic organisms. There study showed some type of risk for the aquatic environments and/or for the activated sludge of WWTPs for pharmaceuticals like acetaminophen, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, clofibrate, ibuprofen, omeprazole, triclosan, parabens, and 1,4-benzoquinone.
Here we have discussed available in silico models on ecotoxicity of pharmaceuticals. Due to the limited availability of the in silico models on ecotoxicity of pharmaceuticals, there is a need to develop more in silico models in order to reduce time and cost involvement as well as reduction of animal usage in getting relevant data and for better and fast risk assessment of pharmaceuticals. It is not possible to experimentally study toxic effects of each pharmaceutical in different species. Most active pharmaceutical ingredients have available rodent toxicity information. As a result, if this data could be extrapolated or modeled to different other species, this would be a noteworthy resource for prioritization of pharmaceuticals with regards to diverse environment hazards. However, very limited papers have been published on interspecies models to predict environmental toxicity for pharmaceuticals, and there are relatively few statistical models available to bridge the chronic toxicity data information gap [168, 169].
6 Endpoints
Toxicity of a molecule should be assayed on specific toxicity endpoints for the generation of data which are employed commonly to develop in silico models. This why a clear concept is required about the endpoints or test batteries as they are employed for the experimental toxicity studies and for understanding the mode of toxicity with respect to that particular endpoint [110]. We list the most commonly employed endpoints for this purpose in Table 3.
7 Databases
A good quality of ecotoxicological data of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites is required for the development of accurate and reproducible in silico models. A significant number of chemical/drug/agrochemical/pesticide toxicity databases towards environment are publicly accessible, and such numbers are growing. But one cannot deny that the existing databases are very few compared to drug discovery compound libraries. Recent initiatives requiring superior use of in silico technologies have called for transparency and expansion of toxicity database information that is available to the public at no cost. Table 4 represents publicly available toxicity databases describing environmental as well as human health effects of pharmaceuticals useful in risk assessment, risk management, safety evaluation, and hazard characterization.
8 Expert Systems
Expert systems allow for the direct entry of a structure into software followed by the calculation or prediction without the requirement to compute descriptors and re-perform the modeling process. This makes expert system a more convenient option for toxicity prediction over traditional QSARs. Expert systems have been frequently employed by regulatory agencies, academia and industries worldwide for more efficient and fast prediction. The foremost criterion of toxicity prediction is to differentiate between toxicologically active and inactive molecules. Multiple mechanisms can lead to the identical toxic effect and this intricacy requires the accessibility of predictive tools that are able to discriminate manifold regions in the activity space. This necessitates the development of so-called expert systems, which try to cover broader structural and activity regions in comparison to the local models. Table 5 summarizes different freely available and commercial expert systems to predict endpoints related toxicity predictions.
9 Green and Ecological Pharmacy
The role of green chemistry and principles are very important for risk management of pharmaceuticals. The principles of green chemistry state that the functionality of a chemical should not only comprise the properties of a chemical essential for its application, but also quick and trouble free degradability after its usage. Improvement of synthesis and renewable feedstock are very important issues for preparation of environment friendly pharmaceuticals. Employing these principles and the awareness of green chemistry to pharmaceuticals are necessary [138]. In this perspective, a system called “benign by design” can be considered which means easy degradability after application is considered even before a pharmaceutical’s synthesis. This approach is not completely new. For instance, it is a general practice during the development of pharmaceuticals that adverse side effects are to be taken into consideration. This can also result in economic rewards in the long run and will fit into green pharmacy [170]. But one has to note that a pharmaceutical may also lose its specific therapeutic action due to the structural modification while introducing green chemistry. However, this approach can be employed at least for the optimized and new synthesis routes [170]. Again, it is true that finding good lead compounds is a major task even without considering the environment toxicity issue. However, there is no requirement to find a new lead compound at first. The modification of known lead structures can be the best option to do. Responding to the green and justifiable pharmacy challenge may also result in new marketing opportunities with help of appropriate and scientific research within industry and academia.
10 Overview and Conclusion
A huge number of reports and publications have been published in the last decade about the ecotoxicity due to human and veterinary pharmaceuticals, but it is still too meager to permit us to execute a systematic and precise risk assessment and appropriate risk management. There is still a huge need of filling the missing data gaps in our knowledge. Due to biologically active and persistence nature of pharmaceuticals, they are one of the most serious threats to human health and environment stability. Additionally, their specific modes of action and specific effects on living systems make pharmaceuticals distinctly different from other chemicals. This sole feature is sufficient reason to assess the potential effects of pharmaceuticals in diverse environmental compartments. The problem is more horrifying as the occurrence level of pharmaceuticals in different environmental compartments is largely varied. The variations in drug occurrences from country to country and also within the different regions of a country make the assessment of pharmaceuticals a troublesome job for the environmental scientist. The interactions between pharmaceuticals and natural stressors of aquatic and terrestrial communities remain to be unexplained. Along with that, the proper risk assessment of mixtures of pharmaceutical products is another area where more introspection is required in present times.
In this book chapter, the hazardous effects of the most common therapeutic classes of pharmaceutical to the living ecosystems and environment are discussed. Furthermore, specific information on the sources, fate, and effects of pharmaceuticals in the environment and their possible negative impact on different ecosystems are explored. There is a lack of sufficient information and scientific data on effects of long-term exposure to nontarget organisms. It is also important to assess the presence of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites and transformation products in several environmental compartments. One can find only a few reports on the quantitative effects of pharmaceuticals, but the effects of metabolites are not sufficiently explored by the scientific community. One has to accept that the identification of risk assessment and management are not sufficient if they are not properly implemented in right way. In these perspectives, the major role should be played by government authorities and agencies by implementing various guidelines and rules for the reduction of toxicity of pharmaceuticals to the environment.
Scarcity of adequate ecotoxicity data related to the diverse classes of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites has stalled appropriate computational modeling and development of expert systems. As a consequence, there are only a very limited number of models developed so far for the risk assessment of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites as well as for the pharmaceutical mixtures. Hence, a sufficient number of models should be developed to address the risk assessment and risk management in an efficient way by minimizing the requirement of time, animal testing and cost. This will also help in gathering the ecotoxicity data as soon as a new pharmaceutical product comes to the market. In this perspective, expert systems are more reliable and results may be easily available in no time. There is a need of more expert systems for prediction of toxicity of pharmaceuticals from diverse classes of therapeutic actions and their metabolites against different endpoints. It is true that in silico techniques cannot substitute “wet” experiments but both of them can be utilized together for a better risk management of pharmaceuticals in near future.
References
Kümmerer K (2001) Pharmaceuticals in the environment: sources, fate, effects and risks. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Halling-Sørensen B, Nors Nielsen S, Lanzky PF et al (1998) Occurrence, fate and effects of pharmaceutical substances in the environment—a review. Chemosphere 36(2):357–393
Santosa LHMLM, Araújoa AN, Fachinia A et al (2010) Ecotoxicological aspects related to the presence of pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment. J Hazard Mater 175:45–95
Li WC (2014) Occurrence, sources, and fate of pharmaceuticals in aquatic environment and soil. Environ Pollut 187:193–201
Rivas J, Encinas A, Beltran F, Grahan N (2011) Application of advanced oxidation processes to doxycycline and norfloxacin removal from water. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 46:944–951
Kumar K, Gupta SC, Chander Y et al (2005) Antibiotic use in agriculture and its impact on the terrestrial environment. Adv Agron 87:1–54
Vidaver AK (2002) Uses of antimicrobials in plant agriculture. Clin Infect Dis 34(Suppl 3):S107–S110
Rooklidge SJ (2004) Environmental antimicrobial contamination from terraccumulation and diffuse pollution pathways. Sci Total Environ 325:1–13
Ternes TA, Bonerz M, Schmidt T (2001) Determination of neutral pharmaceuticals in wastewater and rivers by liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 938:175–185
Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT et al (2002) Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999–2000: a national reconnaissance. Environ Sci Technol 36:1202–1211
Daughton CG, Ternes TA (1999) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: agents of subtle change? Environ Health Perspect 107:907–937
Adler P, Steger-Hartmann T, Kalbfus W (2001) Distribution of natural and synthetic estrogenic steroid hormones in water samples from southern and middle Germany. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 29:227–241
Ternes T (1998) Occurrence of drugs in German sewage treatment plants and rivers. Water Res 32:3245–3260
Ahrer W, Scherwenk E, Buchberger W (2001) Occurrence and fate of fluoroquinolone, macrolide, and sulphonamide antibiotics during wastewater treatment and in ambient waters in Switzerland. In: Daughton CG, Jones-Lepp T (eds) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: scientific and regulatory issues, Symposium series 791. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 56–69
Heberer T (2002) Tracking persistent pharmaceutical residues from municipal sewage to drinking water. J Hydrol 266:175–189
Rabiet M, Togola A, Brissaud F et al (2006) Consequence of wastewater disposal on the contamination of the water resource by pharmaceuticals in a Mediterranean basin. Environ Sci Technol 40:5282–5288
Zuccato E, Calamari D, Natangelo M et al (2000) Presence of therapeutic drugs in the environment. Lancet 355:1789–1790
Castiglioni S, Zuccato E, Chiabrando C et al (2008) Mass spectrometric analysis of illicit drugs in wastewater and surface water. Mass Spectrom Rev 27:378–394
Schultz MM, Furlong ET (2008) Trace analysis of antidepressant pharmaceuticals and their select degradates in aquatic matrixes by LC/ESI/MS/MS. Anal Chem 80:1756–1762
Metcalfe CD, Miao XS, Koenig BG et al (2003) Distribution of acidic and neutral drugs in surface waters near sewage treatment plants in the lower Great Lakes, Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:2881–2889
Frick EA, Henderson AK, Moll DM, et al (2001) Presented at the Georgia Water Resources Conference, Athens, GA
Tauber R (2003) Quantitative analysis of pharmaceuticals in drinking water from ten Canadian cities. Enviro-Test Laboratories, Winnipeg, Manitoba
Loraine GA, Pettigrove ME (2006) Seasonal variations in concentrations of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in drinking water and reclaimed wastewater in Southern California. Environ Sci Technol 40:687–695
Fink L, Dror I, Berkowitz B (2012) Enrofloxacin oxidative degradation facilities by metal oxide nanoparticles. Chemosphere 86:144–149
Hellweger FL, Ruan X, Cherchia E et al (2011) Applicability of standard antibiotic toxicity testes to the ambient aquatic environment. Ann Environ Sci 5:61–66
Seiler JP (2002) Pharmacodynamic activity of drugs and ecotoxicology can the two be connected? Toxicol Lett 131:105–115
European Commission, Directive 2006/121/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 amending Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances in order to adapt it to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and establishing a European Chemicals Agency. Off J Eur Union, L 396/850 of 30.12.2006, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg
EMEA (2006) Guideline on the environmental impact assessment of medicinal products for human use. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, London, UK (Report no. CPMP/SWP/4447/00)
FDA-CDER (1998) Guidance for industry-environmental assessment of human drugs and biologics applications, revision 1. FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Rockville
FDA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) (1998) CMC 6—revision 1
Boxall ABA, Kolpin D, Halling Sørensen B et al (2003) Are veterinary medicines causing environmental risks. Environ Sci Technol 36:286–294
Ternes TA, Hirsch R (2000) Occurrence and behavior of X-ray contrast media in sewage facilities and the aquatic environment. Environ Sci Technol 34:2741–2748
Persson M, Sabelström E, Gunnarsson B (2009) Handling of unused prescription drugs-knowledge, behaviour and attitude among Swedish people. Environ Int 35:771–774
Li D, Yang M, Hu J et al (2008) Determination and fate of oxytetracycline and related compounds in oxytetracycline production wastewater and the receiving river. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:80–86
José Gómez M, Petrovic M, Fernández-Alba AR et al (2006) Determination of pharmaceuticals of various therapeutic classes by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis in hospital effluent wastewaters. J Chromatogr 1114:224–233
Kreuzig R, Höltge S, Brunotte J et al (2005) Test plat studies on runoff of sulfonamides from manured soil after sprinkler irrigation. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:777–781
Xia K, Bhandari A, Das K et al (2005) Occurrence and fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in biosolids. J Environ Qual 34:91–104
Serrano PH (2005) Responsible use of antibiotics in aquaculture. Fisheries technical paper 469. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome
http://www.apsnet.org/online/feature/Antibiotics/. Accessed 4 June 2015
http://www.esac.ua.ac.be/main.aspx?c=*ESAC2&n=1066l. Accessed 4 June 2015
Cleuvers M (2003) Aquatic ecotoxicity of pharmaceuticals including the assessment of combination effects. Toxicol Lett 142:185–194
Harnagea-Theophilus E, Gadd SL, Knight-Trent HA et al (1999) Acetaminophen-induced proliferation of breast cancer cells involves estrogen receptors. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 155:273–279
Halling-Sørensen B (2000) Algal toxicity of antibacterial agents used in intensive farming. Chemosphere 40:731–739
Ferrari B, Paxeus N, Lo Giudice R et al (2003) Ecotoxicological impact of pharmaceuticals found in treated wastewaters: study of carbamazepine, clofibric acid, and diclofenac. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 55(3):359–370
Cleuvers M (2004) Mixture toxicity of the anti-inflammatory drugs diclofenac, ibuprofen, naproxen and acetylsalicylic acid. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 59:309–315
Verenitch SS, Lowe CJ, Mazumder A (2006) Determination of acidic drugs and caffeine in municipal wastewaters and receiving waters by gas chromatography-ion trap tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1116:193–203
Bendz D, Paxéus NA, Ginn TR et al (2005) Occurrence and fate of pharmaceutically active compounds in the environment, a case study: Höje River in Sweden. J Hazard Mater 122:195–204
Calamari D, Zuccato E, Castiglioni S et al (2003) Strategic survey of therapeutic drugs in the Rivers Po and Lambro in Northern Italy. Environ Sci Technol 37:1241–1248
Barnes KK, Kolpin DW, Furlong ET et al (2008) A national reconnaissance of pharmaceuticals and other organic wastewater contaminants in the United States: I) Groundwater. Sci Total Environ 402:192–200
Pounds N, Maclean S, Webley M et al (2008) Acute and chronic effects of ibuprofen in the mollusc Planorbis carinatus (Gastropoda: Planorbidae). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 70:47–52
Hernando MD, Heath E, Petrovic M et al (2006) Trace-level determination of pharmaceuticals residues by LC–MS/MS in natural and treated waters. A pilot-survey study. Anal Bioanal Chem 385:985–991
Kim JW, Ishibashi H, Yamauchi R et al (2009) Acute toxicity of pharmaceutical and personal care products on freshwater crustacean (Thamnocephalus platyurus) and fish (Oryzias latipes). J Toxicol Sci 34:227–232
Isidori M, Lavorgna M, Nardelli A (2005) Ecotoxicity of naproxen and its phototransformation products. Sci Total Environ 48:93–101
Kim Y, Choi K, Jung J et al (2007) Aquatic toxicity of acetaminophen, carbamazepine, cimetidine, diltiazem and six major sulfonamides, and their potential ecological risks in Korea. Environ Int 33:275–370
Quinn B, Gagné F, Blaise C (2008) An investigation into the acute and chronic toxicity of eleven pharmaceuticals (and their solvents) found in wastewater effluent on the cnidarian, Hydra attenuate. Sci Total Environ 389:306–314
Zurita JL, Repetto G, Jos A et al (2007) Toxicological effects of the lipid regulator gemfibrozil in four aquatic systems. Aquat Toxicol 81:106–115
Miao XS, Metcalfe CD (2003) Determination of cholesterol-lowering statin drugs in aqueous samples using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 998:133–141
Park S, Choi K (2008) Hazard assessment of commonly used agricultural antibiotics on aquatic ecosystems. Ecotoxicology 17:526–538
Heckamann LH, Callaghan A, Hooper HL et al (2007) Chronic toxicity of ibuprofen to Daphnia magna: effects on life history traits and population dynamics. Toxicol Lett 172:137–145
Isidori M, Lavorgna M, Nardelli A et al (2005) Toxic and genotoxic evaluation of six antibiotics on non-target organisms. Sci Total Environ 346:87–98
Vulliet E, Wiest L, Baudot R et al (2008) Multi-residue analysis of steroids at sub-ng/L levels in surface and ground-waters using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1210:84–91
Zuehlke S, Duennbier U, Heberer T (2005) Determination of estrogenic steroids in surface water and wastewater by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci 28:52–58
Pawlowski S, van Aerle R, Tyler CR et al (2004) Effects of 17α-ethinylestradiol in a fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) gonadal recrudescence assay. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 57:330–345
Winter MJ, Lillicrap AD, Caunter JE et al (2008) Defining the chronic impacts of atenolol on embryo-larval development and reproduction in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Aquat Toxicol 86:361–369
Péry ARR, Gust M, Vollat B et al (2008) Fluoxetine effects assessment on the life cycle of aquatic invertebrates. Chemosphere 73:300–304
Vasskog T, Anderssen T, Pedersen-Bjergaard S et al (2008) Occurrence of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in sewage and receiving waters at Spitsbergen and in Norway. J Chromatogr A 1185:194–205
Grung M, Källqvist T, Sakshaug S et al (2008) Environmental assessment of Norwegian priority pharmaceuticals based on the EMEA guideline. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 71:328–340
Frade VMF, Dias M, Teixeira ACSC et al (2014) Environmental contamination by fluoroquinolones. Braz J Pharm Sci 50:41–54
Ye Z, Weinberg HS, Meyer MT (2007) Trace analysis of trimethoprim and sulfonamide, macrolide, quinolone, and tetracycline antibiotics in chlorinated drinking water using liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 79:1135–1144
Moder M, Braun P, Lange F et al (2007) Determination of endocrine disrupting compounds and acidic drugs in water by coupling of derivatization, gas chromatography and negative-chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Clean Soil Air Water 35:444–451
Mompelat S, Le Bot B, Thomas O (2009) Occurrence and fate of pharmaceutical products and by-products, from resource to drinking water. Environ Int 35:803–814
Martín J, Camacho-Muñoz D, Santos JL et al (2012) Occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in wastewater and sludge from wastewater treatment plants: removal and ecotoxicological impact of wastewater discharges and sludge disposal. J Hazard Mater 239–240:40–47
Martínez-Carballo E, González-Barreiro C, Scharf S et al (2007) Environmental monitoring study of selected veterinary antibiotics in animal manure and soils in Austria. Environ Pollut 148:570–579
Hamscher G, Sczesny S, Höper H et al (2002) Determination of persistent tetracycline residues in soil fertilized with liquid manure by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 74:1509–1518
Ho YB, Zakaria MP, Latif PA et al (2012) Simultaneous determination of veterinary antibiotics and hormone in broiler manure, soil and manure compost by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1262:160–168
Hamscher G, Pawelzick HT, Sczesny S et al (2003) Antibiotics in dust originating from a pig fattening farm: a new source of health hazard for farmers? Environ Health Perspect 111:1590–1594
Kümmerer K, Alexy R, Hüttig J (2004) Standardized tests fail to assess the effects of antibiotics on environmental bacteria. Water Res 38:2111–2116
Carucci A, Cappai G, Piredda M (2006) Biodegradability and toxicity of pharmaceuticals in biological wastewater treatment plants. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 41:1831–1842
Hernando MD, DeVettori S, Martínez-Bueno MJ et al (2007) Toxicity evaluation with Vibrio fisheri test of organic chemicals used in aquaculture. Chemosphere 68:724–730
Thomulka KW, McGee DJ (1993) Detection of biohazardous materials in water by measuring bioluminescence reduction with the marine organism Vibrio harveyi. J Environ Sci Health A28:2153–2166
Brain RA, Johnson DJ, Richards SM (2004) Microcosm evaluation of the effects of an eight pharmaceutical mixture to the aquatic macrophytes Lemna gibba and Myriophyllum sibiricum. Aquat Toxicol 70:23–40
Sengelov G, Agerso Y, Halling-Sørensen B et al (2001) Bacterial antibiotic resistance levels in farmland as a result of treatment with pig slurry. Environ Int 28:587–595
Hansen AJ, Jensen J, Krogh PH (2000) Effects of the antibiotics oxytetracycline and tylosin on soil fauna. Chemosphere 40:751–757
Takai H, Pedersen S, Johnsen JO et al (1998) Concentrations and emissions of airborne dust in livestock buildings in northern Europe. J Agric Eng Res 70:59–77
Holt D, Harvey D, Hurley R (1993) Chloramphenicol toxicity. Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev 12:83–95
Harrison PF, Lederberg J (1998) Antimicrobial resistance, issues and options. National Academic Press, Washington, DC
Oaks JL, Gilbert M, Virani MZ et al (2004) Diclofenac residues as the cause of population decline of vultures in Pakistan. Nature 427:630–633
Schwabe U, Paffrath D (2003) Arzneiverordnungs report. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany
Ferrari B, Mons R, Vollat B et al (2004) Environmental risk assessment of six human pharmaceuticals: are the current environmental risk assessment procedures sufficient for the protection of the aquatic environment? Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1344–1354
Schwaiger J, Ferling H, Mallow U et al (2004) Toxic effects of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac: part I: histopathological alterations and bioaccumulation in rainbow trout. Aquat Toxicol 68:141–150
Isidori M, Nardelli A, Pascarella L et al (2007) Toxic and genotoxic impact of fibrates and their photoproducts on non-target organism. Environ Int 33:635–641
Nunes B, Carvalho F, Guilhermino L (2004) Acute and chronic effects of clofibrate and clofibric acid on the enzymes acetylcholinesterase, lactate dehydrogenase and catalase of the mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki. Chemosphere 57:1581–1589
Santamarina MT, Leiro J, Vilanova R et al (1987) The immunosuppressive effect of clofibrate and cyclosporine on IgM and IgE antibodies induced by Trichinella spiralis. Rev Iber Parasitol 47:289–293
Triebskorn R, Casper H, Scheil V et al (2007) Ultrastructural effects of pharmaceuticals (carbamazepine, clofibric acid, metoprolol, diclofenac) in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Anal Bioanal Chem 387:1405–1416
Misra SK, Sharma AK, Mehdi H et al (1986) Effect of cholesterol and alpha p-chlorophenoxyisobutyyrate on virulence in Acanthamoeba culbertsoni strain A-1 and C-7. Int J Parasitol 16:191–196
Vandewaa EA, Mills G, Chen GZ et al (1989) Physiological role of HMG-CoA reductase in regulating egg production by Schistosoma mansoni. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 257:618–625
Huggett DB, Brooks BW, Peterson B et al (2002) Toxicity of select beta adrenergic receptor-blocking pharmaceuticals (β-blockers) on aquatic organisms. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 43:229–235
Haider S, Baqri SSR (2000) β-Adrenoceptor antagonists reinitiate meiotic maturation in Clarias batrachus oocytes. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 126:517–525
Ohnishi ST, Sadanaga KK, Katsuoka M et al (1989) Effects of membrane acting-drugs on Plasmodium species and sickle cell erythrocytes. Mol Cell Biochem 91:159–165
Coppi A, Merali S, Eichinger D (2002) The enteric parasite Entamoeba uses an autocrine catecholamine system during differentiation into the infectious cysts stage. J Biol Chem 277:8083–8090
Sanderson H, Brain RA, Johnson DJ et al (2004) Toxicity classification and evaluation of four pharmaceuticals classes: antibiotics, antineoplastics, cardiovascular, and sex hormones. Toxicology 203:27–40
Henschel K-P, Wenzel A, Diedrich M et al (1997) Environmental hazard assessment of pharmaceuticals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 25:220–225
Boroskova Z, Dvoroznakova E, Tomasovicova O et al (2001) The effect of cyclophosphamide on the cellular and humoral immune responses on experimental Toxocara canis infestation. Helminthologia 38:193–199
Grujić S, Vasiljević T, Lauŝević M (2009) Determination of multiple pharmaceutical classes in surface and ground waters by liquid chromatography-ion trap-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1216:4989–5000
Ellenberger TE, Wright JE, Rosowsky A et al (1989) Wild-type and drug-resistant Leishmania major hydrolyze methotrexate to N-10-methyl-4-deoxy-4-aminopteroate without accumulation of methotrexate polyglutamates. J Biol Chem 264:15960–15966
Warren KS (1967) Studies on the treatment of molluscan Schistosomiasis mansoni with antibiotics, non-antibiotic metabolic inhibitors, molluscicides and antischistosomal agents. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 61:368–372
Miguel DC, Yokoyama-Yasunaka JKU, Andreoli WK et al (2007) Tamoxifen is effective against Leishmania and induces a rapid alkalinization of parasitophorous vacuoles harbouring Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis amastigotes. J Antimicrob Chemother 60:526–534
Harwood PD (1953) The anthelmintic properties of phenothiazine. Exp Parasitol 2:428–455
Minagh E, Hernan R, O’Rourke K et al (2009) Aquatic ecotoxicity of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline hydrochloride in a battery of freshwater test species. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72:434–440
Crane M, Watts C, Boucard T (2006) Chronic aquatic environmental risks from exposure to human pharmaceuticals. Sci Total Environ 367:23–41
Baqui A, Ansari JA (1987) Investigations on the response to various stimuli of the microfilariae of Setaria cervi in white rats. Helminthologia 24:33–42
Jones-Brando L, Torrey EF, Yolkem R (2003) Drugs used in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder inhibit the replication of Toxoplasma gondii. Schizophr Res 62:237–244
Thacker PD (2005) Pharmaceutical data elude researchers. Environ Sci Technol 39:193A–194A
Arcay L (1985) Influence of sex hormones on the experimental infection produced by a strain of Leishmania mexicana amazonensis from Venezuela. Rev Latinoam Microbiol 27:195–207
Wang R, Belosevic M (1994) Estradiol increases susceptibility of goldfish to Trypanosoma danilewskyi. Dev Comp Immunol 18:377–387
Boxall AB, Fogg LA, Baird DJ et al (2005) Targeted monitoring study for veterinary medicines in the environment. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK
Erzen NK, Kolar L, Cerkvenik Flajs V et al (2005) Degradation of abamectin and doramectin on sheep grazed pasture. Ecotoxicology 14:627–635
Grønvold J, Svendsen TS, Kraglund HO et al (2004) Effect of the antiparasitic drugs fenbendazole and ivermectin on the soil nematode Pristionchus maupasi. Vet Parasitol 24:91–99
Svendsen TS, Hansen PE, Sommer C et al (2005) Life history characteristics of Lumbricus terrestris and effects of the veterinary antiparasitics compounds Ivermectin and fenbendazole. Soil Biol Biochem 37:927–936
Sun Y, Diao X, Zhang Q et al (2005) Bioaccumulation and elimination of avermectin B1a in the earthworm (Eisenia fetida). Chemosphere 60:699–704
Halley BA, Winter R, Yoon S et al (2005) The environmental safety of eprinomectin to earthworms. Vet Parasitol 128:109–114
Singer AC, Johnson AC, Anderson PD (2008) Reassessing the risks of Tamiflu use during a pandemic to the Lower Colorado River. Environ Health Perspect 116:A285–A286
Soderstrom H, Jarhult JD, Fick J et al (2010) Levels of antivirals and antibiotics in the River Thames, UK, during the pandemic 2009. SETAC Europe annual meeting, Seville
Flaherty CM, Dodson SI (2005) Effects of pharmaceuticals on Daphnia survival, growth, and reproduction. Chemosphere 61:200–207
Rappaport SM (2011) Implications of the exposome for exposure science. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 21:5–9
NRC (National Research Council) (1983) Risk assessment in the Federal Government: managing the process. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, Accessed 4 June 2015
NRC (National Research Council) (2007) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, https://download.nap.edu/login.php?record_id=11970&page=%2Fdownload.php%3Frecord_id%3D11970. Accessed 4 June 2015
Wignall JA, Shapiro AJ, Wright FA et al (2014) Standardizing benchmark dose calculations to improve science-based decisions in human health assessments. Environ Health Perspect 122:499–505
Yoon M, Campbell J, Andersen ME et al (2012) In vitro to in vivo extrapolation of cell-based toxicity assay results. Crit Rev Toxicol 42:633–652
Wetmore BA, Wambaugh JF, Ferguson SS et al (2012) Integration of dosimetry, exposure, and high-throughput screening data in chemical toxicity assessment. Toxicol Sci 125:157–174
Zhang Q, Bhattacharya S, Andersen ME et al (2010) Computational systems biology and dose-response modeling in relation to new directions in toxicity testing. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 13:253–276
US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2010) Exposure assessment tools and models: what is an exposure assessment? http://www.epa.gov/oppt/exposure/pubs/exposurep.htm. Accessed 4 June 2015
Hays SM, Aylward LL (2008) Using biomonitoring equivalents to interpret human biomonitoring data in a public health risk context. J Appl Toxicol 29:275–288
Barton HA, Chiu WA, Woodrow SR et al (2007) Characterizing uncertainty and variability in physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: state of the science and needs for research and implementation. Toxicol Sci 99:395–402
Jones DP, Park Y, Ziegler TR (2012) Nutritional metabolomics: progress in addressing complexity in diet and health. Annu Rev Nutr 32:183–202
van Gestel CA, Jonker M, Kammenga JE (2010) Mixture toxicity: linking approaches from ecological and human toxicology. Taylor & Francis, USA
Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment Risk Management (1997) Risk assessment and risk management in regulatory decision-making. Final report, vol. 2. PCRARM, Washington, DC. http://www.riskworld.com. Accessed 4 June 2015
Kümmerer K (2007) Sustainable from the very beginning: rational design of molecules by life cycle engineering as an important approach for green pharmacy and green chemistry. Green Chem 9:899–907
Nowotny N, Epp B, Von Sonntag C (2007) Quantification and modeling of the elimination behavior of ecologically problematic wastewater micropollutants by adsorption on powdered and granulated activated carbon. Environ Sci Technol 41:2050–2055
Fjodorova N, Novich M, Vrachko N et al (2008) Directions in QSAR modeling for regulatory uses in OECD member countries, EU and in Russia. J Environ Sci Health C 26:201–236
Knacker T, Duis K, Ternes T et al (2005) The EU-project ERAPharm—Incentives for the further development of guidance documents? Environ Sci Pollut Res 12:62–65
Cleuvers M (2002) Aquatic ecotoxicology of selected pharmaceutical agents—algal and acute Daphnia tests. UWSE-Z Umweltchem Ökotox 14:85–89
VICH (2004) Environmental impact assessment (EIAs) for veterinary medicinal products (VMPs)–Phase II, Draft Guidance, August, 2003, International cooperation on harmonization of the technical requirements for registration of veterinary medicinal products. http://vich.eudra.org/pdf/10_2003/g138_st4.pdf
http://www.nicnas.gov.au/. Accessed 4 June 2015
Selassie CD (2003) History of quantitative structure-activity relationships. In: Abraham DJ (ed) Burger’s medicinal chemistry and drug discovery. Wiley, New York, pp 1–48
Roy K, Kar S (2015) How to judge predictive quality of classification and regression based QSAR models? In: Haq ZU, Madura J (eds) Frontiers of computational chemistry. Bentham, pp 71–120. http://ebooks.benthamscience.com/book/9781608059782/chapter/128894/
Roy K, Kar S (2015) Importance of applicability domain of QSAR models. In: Roy K (ed) quantitative structure-activity relationships in drug design, predictive toxicology, and risk assessment, IGI Global, pp 180–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8136-1.ch005
http://ec.europa.eu/research/biosociety/pdf/anim_al_see_final_report.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2015
Kar S, Roy K (2012) Risk assessment for ecotoxicity of pharmaceuticals—an emerging issue. Expert Opin Drug Saf 11:235–274
Kanter J (2013) E.U. Bans cosmetics with animal-tested ingredients. http://www.nytimes.com, March 11. Accessed 4 June 2015
Graef A (2013) Victory! India bans animal testing for cosmetics. http://care2.com, July 2. Accessed 4 June 2015
Bloomberg News (2013) China animal testing complicates L’Oreal’s expansion. www.Bloomberg.com, August 22. Accessed 4 June 2015
Cronin MTD, Livingstone DJ (2004) Predicting chemical toxicity and fate. CRC, Washington, DC
Schultz TW, Cronin MTD, Walker JD (2003) Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) in toxicology: a historical perspective. J Mol Struct (Theochem) 622:1–22
Kar S, Roy K (2010) Predictive toxicology using QSAR: a perspective. J Indian Chem Soc 87:1455–1515
Kar S, Roy K (2010) First report on interspecies quantitative correlation of ecotoxicity of pharmaceuticals. Chemosphere 81:738–747
Das RN, Sanderson H, Mwambo AE et al (2013) Preliminary studies on model development for rodent toxicity and its interspecies correlation with aquatic toxicities of pharmaceuticals. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 90:375–381
Sanderson H, Thomsen M (2009) Comparative analysis of pharmaceuticals versus industrial chemicals acute aquatic toxicity classification according to the United Nations classification system for chemicals. Assessment of the (Q)SAR predictability of pharmaceuticals acute aquatic toxicity and their predominant acute toxic mode-of-action. Toxicol Lett 187:84–93
Escher BI, Bramaz N, Richter M et al (2006) Comparative ecotoxicological hazard assessment of beta-blockers and their human metabolites using a mode-of-action-based test battery and a QSTR approach. Environ Sci Technol 40:7402–7408
Berninger JP, Brooks BW (2010) Leveraging mammalian pharmaceutical toxicology and pharmacology data to predict chronic fish responses to pharmaceuticals. Toxicol Lett 193:69–78
Sanderson H, Johnson D, Reitsma T et al (2004) Ranking and prioritization of environmental risks of pharmaceuticals in surface waters. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 39:158–183
Sanderson H, Thomsen M (2007) Ecotoxicological quantitative structure–activity relationships for pharmaceuticals. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 79:331–335
Lienert J, Güdel K, Escher BI (2007) Screening method for ecotoxicological hazard assessment of 42 pharmaceuticals considering human metabolism and excretory routes. Environ Sci Technol 41:4471–4478
Christen V, Hickmann S, Rechenberg B et al (2010) Highly active human pharmaceuticals in aquatic systems: a concept for their identification based on their mode of action. Aquat Toxicol 96:167–181
http://www.biograf.ch. accessed 4 June 2015
Escher BI, Baumgartner R, Koller M et al (2011) Environmental toxicology and risk assessment of pharmaceuticals from hospital wastewater. Water Res 45:75–92
de García MSAO, Pinto GP, García-Encina PA et al (2014) Ecotoxicity and environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in aquatic environments and wastewater treatment plants. Ecotoxicology 23:1517–1533
Sanderson H (2012) Challenges and directions for regulatory use of QSARs for predicting active pharmaceutical ingredients environmental toxicity. Curr Drug Saf 7:309–312
Kar S, Das RN, Roy K, Leszczynski J (2015) Can Toxicity for Different Species be Correlated? The Concept and Emerging Applications of Interspecies Quantitative StructureToxicity Relationship (i-QSTR) Modeling. Int J Quant Struct-Prop Relat 1(2): 23–51, doi: 10.4018/IJQSPR.2016070102
Kümmerer K (2009) The presence of pharmaceuticals in the environment due to human use-present knowledge and future challenges. J Environ Manage 90:2354–2366
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Roy, K., Kar, S. (2016). In Silico Models for Ecotoxicity of Pharmaceuticals. In: Benfenati, E. (eds) In Silico Methods for Predicting Drug Toxicity. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1425. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3609-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3609-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3607-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3609-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols