Abstract
This chapter introduces a computational analysis method for analyzing gene circuit dynamics in terms of modules while taking into account stochasticity, system nonlinearity, and retroactivity.
-
(1)
Analog electrical circuit representation for gene circuits: A connection between two gene circuit components is often mediated by a transcription factor (TF) and the connection signal is described by the TF concentration. The TF is sequestered to its specific binding site (promoter region) and regulates downstream transcription. This sequestration has been known to affect the dynamics of the TF by increasing its response time. The downstream effect—retroactivity—has been shown to be explicitly described in an electrical circuit representation, as an input capacitance increase. We provide a brief review on this topic.
-
(2)
Modular description of noise propagation: Gene circuit signals are noisy due to the random nature of biological reactions. The noisy fluctuations in TF concentrations affect downstream regulation. Thus, noise can propagate throughout the connected system components. This can cause different circuit components to behave in a statistically dependent manner, hampering a modular analysis. Here, we show that the modular analysis is still possible at the linear noise approximation level.
-
(3)
Noise effect on module input–output response: We investigate how to deal with a module input–output response and its noise dependency. Noise-induced phenotypes are described as an interplay between system nonlinearity and signal noise.
Lastly, we provide the comprehensive approach incorporating the above three analysis methods, which we call “stochastic modular analysis.” This method can provide an analysis framework for gene circuit dynamics when the nontrivial effects of retroactivity, stochasticity, and nonlinearity need to be taken into account.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design rules: the power of modularity. MIT Press, Cambridge
Kim KH, Sauro HM (2010) Fan-out in gene regulatory networks. J Biol Eng 4:16
Jiang P, Ventura AC, Sontag ED, Merajver SD, Ninfa AJ, Del Vecchio D (2011) Load-induced modulation of signal transduction networks. Sci Signal 4(194):ra67
Ventura AC, Jiang P, Van Wassenhove L, Del Vecchio D, Merajver SD, Ninfa AJ (2010) Signaling properties of a covalent modification cycle are altered by a downstream target. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:10032–10037
Buchler NE, Cross FR (2009) Protein sequestration generates a flexible ultrasensitive response in a genetic network. Mol Syst Biol 5:272
Jayanthi S, Nilgiriwala KS, Del Vecchio D (2013) Retroactivity controls the temporal dynamics of gene transcription. ACS Synth Biol
Daniel R, Rubens JR, Sarpeshkar R, Lu TK (2013) Synthetic analog computation in living cells. Nature 497(7451):619–623
Del Vecchio D, Ninfa AJ, Sontag ED (2008) Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation. Mol Syst Biol 4:161
Weinberger LS, Dar RD, Simpson ML (2008) Transient-mediated fate determination in a transcriptional circuit of HIV. Nat Genet 40(4):466–470
Kim KH, Sauro HM (2011) Measuring retroactivity from noise in gene regulatory networks. Biophys J 100(5):1167–1177
Kim KH, Sauro HM (2012) Measuring the degree of modularity in gene regulatory networks from the relaxation of finite perturbations. In: 2012 I.E. 51st IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), pp 5330–5335
Elf J, Ehrenberg M (2003) Fast evaluation of fluctuations in biochemical networks with the linear noise approximation. Genome Res 13(11):2475–2484
Paulsson J (2004) Summing up the noise in gene networks. Nature 427(6973):415–418
Tănase-Nicola S, Warren PB, ten Wolde PR (2006) Signal detection, modularity, and the correlation between extrinsic and intrinsic noise in biochemical networks. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):68102
Warren PB, Tanase-Nicola S, ten Wolde PR (2006) Exact results for noise power spectra in linear biochemical reaction networks. J Chem Phys 125(14):144904
Kwakernaak H, Sivan R (1972) Linear optimal control systems. Wiley-Interscience, New York
Simpson ML, Cox CD, Sayler GS (2003) Frequency domain analysis of noise in autoregulated gene circuits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(8):4551
Austin DW, Allen MS, McCollum JM, Dar RD, Wilgus JR, Sayler GS, Samatova NF, Cox CD, Simpson ML (2006) Gene network shaping of inherent noise spectra. Nature 439:608–611
Paulsson J, Berg OG, Ehrenberg M (2000) Stochastic focusing: fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(13):7148–7153
Kim KH, Qian H, Sauro HM (2013) Nonlinear biochemical signal processing via noise propagation. arXiv:1309.2588 [q-bio.QM]
Gómez-Uribe CA, Verghese GC (2007) Mass fluctuation kinetics: capturing stochastic effects in systems of chemical reactions through coupled mean-variance computations. J Chem Phys 126(2):24109
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Kim, K.H., Sauro, H.M. (2015). Stochastic Modular Analysis for Gene Circuits: Interplay Among Retroactivity, Nonlinearity, and Stochasticity. In: Marchisio, M. (eds) Computational Methods in Synthetic Biology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1244. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1878-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1878-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1877-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1878-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols