Abstract
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) can be used to transiently disrupt the function of specified cortical targets. If this disruption is generated prior to the onset of a critical regional function, a suppression or arrest of the said function may result. This method of using TMS to disrupt functions has been dubbed the “virtual lesion” approach. In this chapter, we explore both the mechanistic and functional foundations of this novel technique. After briefly discussing the history and development of this paradigm, we outline practical applications of the “virtual lesion” in clinical, cognitive, and behavioral research. Finally, we offer practical considerations to ensure successful experimentation with and application of this technique.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mottaghy FM, Gangitano M, Horkan C, Chen Y, Pascual-Leone A, Schlaug G (2003) Repetitive TMS temporarily alters brain diffusion. Neurology 60(9):1539–1541
Sack AT, Linden DE (2003) Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional brain imaging in cognitive brain research: possibilities and limitations. Brain Res Rev 43(1):41–56
Harris JA, Clifford CW, Miniussi C (2008) The functional effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation: signal suppression or neural noise generation? J Cogn Neurosci 20(4):734–740
Walsh V, Cowey A (2000) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 1(1):73–79
Valero-Cabre A, Payne BR, Pascual-Leone A (2007) Opposite impact on 14C-2-deoxyglucose brain metabolism following patterns of high and low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the posterior parietal cortex. Exp Brain Res 176(4):603–615
Hilgetag CC, Theoret H, Pascual-Leone A (2001) Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced ‘virtual lesions’ of human parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 4(9):953–957
Maeda F, Keenan JP, Tormos JM, Topka H, Pascual-Leone A (2000) Interindividual variability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability. Exp Brain Res 133:425–430
Speer AM, Kimbrell TA, Wassermann EM, D Repella J, Willis MW, Herscovitch P et al (2000) Opposite effects of high and low frequency rTMS on regional brain activity in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry 48(12):1133–1141
Fecteau S, Pascual-Leone A, Theoret H (2006) Paradoxical facilitation of attention in healthy humans. Behav Neurol 17(3–4):159–162
Silvanto J, Muggleton NG, Cowey A, Walsh V (2007) Neural adaptation reveals state-dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 25:1874–1881
Robertson EM, Theoret H, Pascual-Leone A (2003) Studies in cognition: the problems solved and created by transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Cogn Neurosci 15(7):948–960
Pascual-Leone A, Walsh V, Rothwell J (2000) Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience—virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10(2):232–237
Pascual-Leone A, Bartres-Faz D, Keenan JP (1999) Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of ‘virtual lesions’. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354(1387):1229–1238
Hadipour-Niktarash A, Lee CK, Desmond JE, Shadmehr R (2007) Impairment of retention but not acquisition of a visuomotor skill through time-dependent disruption of primary motor cortex. J Neurosci 27(49):13413–13419
Bestmann S, Ruff CC, Blankenburg F, Weiskopf N, Driver J, Rothwell JC (2008) Mapping causal interregional influences with concurrent TMS-fMRI. Exp Brain Res 191(4):383–402
Ruff CC, Driver J, Bestmann S (2009) Combining TMS and fMRI: from ‘virtual lesions’ to functional-network accounts of cognition. Cortex 45(9):1043–1049
Siebner HR, Rothwell J (2003) Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity. Exp Brain Res 148(1):1–16
Thut G, Miniussi C (2009) New insights into rhythmic brain activity from TMS-EEG studies. Trends Cogn Sci 13(4):182–189
Lou HC, Luber B, Stanford A, Lisanby SH (2010) Self-specific processing in the default network: a single-pulse TMS study. Exp Brain Res 207(1–2):27–38
Paus T (2005) Inferring causality in brain images: a perturbation approach. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360(1457):1109–1114
Hampson M, Hoffman RE (2010) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and connectivity mapping: tools for studying the neural bases of brain disorders. Front Syst Neurosci 4:40
Levit-Binnun N, Litvak V, Pratt H, Moses E, Zaroor M, Peled A (2007) Differences in TMS-evoked responses between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls can be observed without a dedicated EEG system. Clin Neurophysiol 121(3):332–339
Ferrarelli F et al (2008) Reduced evoked gamma oscillations in the frontal cortex in schizophrenia patients: a TMS/EEG study. Am J Psychiatry 165(8):996–1005
Oberman L, Eldaief M, Fecteau S, Ifert-Miller F, Tormos JM, Pascual-Leone A (2012) Abnormal modulation of corticospinal excitability in adults with Asperger’s syndrome. Eur J Neurosci 36(6):2782–2788
Pascual-Leone A, Gates JR, Dhuna A (1991) Induction of speech arrest and counting errors with rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 41(5):697–702
Jin Y, Hilgetag C (2008) Perturbation of visuospatial attention by high-frequency offline rTMS. Exp Brain Res 189:121–128
Siebner HR, Hartwigsen G, Kassuba T, Rothwell JC (2009) How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition. Cortex 45(9):1035–1042
Silvanto J, Muggleton NG (2008) New light through old windows: moving beyond the “virtual lesion” approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 39:549–552
Borckardt JJ, Walker J, Branham RK, Rydin-Gray S, Hunter C, Beeson H, Reeves ST, Madan A, Sackeim H, George MS (2008) Development and evaluation of a portable sham transcranial magnetic stimulation system. Brain Stimul 1(1):52–59
Lu MK, Arai N, Tsai CH, Ziemann U (2012) Movement related cortical potentials of cued versus self-initiated movements: double dissociated modulation by dorsal premotor cortex versus supplementary motor area rTMS. Hum Brain Mapp 33:824–839
Romei V, Driver J, Schyns PG, Thut G (2011) Rhythmic TMS over parietal cortex links distinct brain frequencies to global versus local visual processing. Curr Biol 21(4):334–337
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Fecteau, S., Eldaief, M. (2014). Offline and Online “Virtual Lesion” Protocols. In: Rotenberg, A., Horvath, J., Pascual-Leone, A. (eds) Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Neuromethods, vol 89. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0879-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0879-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0878-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0879-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols