Abstract
The article presents the several steps to be performed on a plant, fungal, insect, or soil sample to obtain DNA sequences for DNA barcode analysis. The chapter begins with a description of sample preparation including procedures for cleaning and proceeds to DNA extraction with methods adapted for the specific type of sample. Next, DNA quantification is described so the proper amount is used for the amplification of the selected barcode regions. Information is provided for reaction mixes and amplification conditions for several referenced barcode primer pairs tuned for the individual sample of interest. This is followed by a description of procedures to access the success of amplification, cleanup, and quantification of the product ready for either Sanger sequencing or library preparation for massive parallel sequencing (MPS). Finally, procedures are provided for Sanger sequencing, library preparation, and MPS sequencing. The chapter provides several references of barcode regions for different sample types.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cui X, Li W, Wei J, Qi Y, Li R, Yang Y et al (2020) Assessing the identity of commercial herbs from a Cambodian market using DNA barcoding. Front Pharmacol 11:244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00244
Robertson JM, Damaso N, Meiklejohn KA (2021) DNA-based analysis of plant material in forensic investigations. In: Dash HR et al (eds) Handbook of DNA profiling. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9364-2_59-1
Pikitch EK (2018) A tool for finding rare marine species. Science 360:1180–1182. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aa03787
Bandelt H-J, Lahermo P, Richards M, Macaulay (2001) Detecting errors in mtDNA data by phylogenetic analysis. Int J Legal Med 115:64–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004140100228
Kress W, Erickson D (2012) DNA barcodes: methods and protocols. Methods Mol Biol 858:3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_1
EMP500 Sample Submission Guide. https://earthmicrobiome.org/protocols-and-standards/emp500-sample-submission-guide/
OSAC 2022-N-0039 collecting and preserving entomological evidence from a terrestrial environment. https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2022/08/31/OSAC%202022-N-0039_Collecting%20and%20Preserving%20Entomological%20Evidence%20from%20a%20Terrestrial%20Environment.OPEN%20CO.pdf
ISO 11063.2020-Direct extraction of soil DNA. Iso.org/standard/75810.html
ISO 23611 Part 1–6 Extraction of live specimens of various groups of soil fauna. ISO.org
ISO 23611-6:2012 (en) Soil quality-sampling of soil invertrebates-Part6: Guidance for the design of sampling programmes with soil invertebrates. ISO.org/standard/50778.html
Thompson LR, Sanders JG, Mc Donald D, Amir A, Jansson JK, Gilbert JA, Knight R, The Earth Microbiome Project Consortium (2017) A communal catalogue reveals earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature 551:457–463. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24621. https://earthmicrobiome.org
Harris SE, Bellino M (2013) DNA barcoding from NYC to Belize. Science 342:1462–1463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230006
Handy SM, Deeds JR, Ivanova NV, Herbert PDN, Hanner R, Ormes A et al (2011) Single laboratory validated method for DNA-barcoding for the species identification of fish. https://www.fda.gov/food/dna-based-seafood-identification/single-laboratory-validated-method-dna-barcoding-species-identification-fish
Meiklejohn KA, Jackson ML, Stern LA, Robertson JM (2018) A protocol for obtaining DNA barcodes from plant and insect fragments isolated from forensic-type soils. Intl J Legal Med 132:1515–1526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1772-1
Meiklejohn KA, Damaso N, Robertson JM (2019) Assessment of BOLD and GenBank-their accuracy and reliability for the identification of biological materials. PLoS One 14:e0217084. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217084
Boggs LM, Scheible MKR, Machado G, Meiklejohn KA (2019) Single fragment or bulk soil DNA metabarcoding: which is better for characterizing biological taxa found in surface soils for sample separation? Genes 10(6):431. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10060431
Nelson LA, Wallman JF, Dowton M (2007) Using COI barcodes to identify forensically and medically important blowflies. Med Vet Entomol 21:44–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2007.00664x
Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Marine Biol Biotechnol 3:294–299
Hebert PD, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:14812–14817. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas/0406166101
Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PD (2006) DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:968–971. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510466103
Meusnier I, Singer GAC, Landry J-F, Hickey DA, Hebert PDN, Hajibabaei M (2008) A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis. BMC Genomics 9(1):214. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-214
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 315–322
Levin RA, Wagner WL, Hoch PC, Nepokroeff M, Pires JC, Zimmer EA (2003) Family-level relationships of onagraceae based on chloroplast rbcl and ndhf data. Am J Bot 90:107–115. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.1.107
Kress WJ, Erickson DL, Jones FA, Swenson NG, Perez R, Sanjur O et al (2009) Plant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics plot in Panama. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:18621–18626. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909820106
Fazekas AJ, Burgess KS, Kesanakurti PR, Graham SW, Newmaster SG, Husband BC et al (2008) Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well. PLoS One 3:e2802. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002802
Little DP (2014) A DNA mini-barcode for land plants. Mol Ecol Res 14:437–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12194
Fazekas AJ, Kuzmina ML, Newmaster SG, Hollingsworth PM (2012) Methods in molecular biology. In: Erickson D, Kress W (eds) DNA barcodes methods and protocols. Humana Press, New York, pp 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-591-5-1
Costion C, Ford A, Cross H, Crayn D, Harrington M, Lowe A (2011) Plant DNA barcodes can accurately estimate species richness in poorly known floras. PLoS One 6:e26841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026841
Ford CS, Ayres KL, Toomey N, Haider N, Stahl JVA, Kelly LJ et al (2009) Selection of candidate coding DNA barcoding regions for use on land plants. Bot J Linn Soc 159:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2008.00938.x
Dunning LT, Savolainen V (2010) Broad-scale amplification of matK for DNA barcoding plants, a technical note. Bot J Linn Soc 164:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01071.x
Wojciechowski MF, Lavin M, Sanderson MJ (2004) A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on the analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. Am J Bot 91(11):1846–1862. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.11.1846
Cuénoud P, Savolainen V, Chatrou LW, Powell M, Grayer RJ, Chase MW (2002) Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. Am J Bot 89:132–144. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.1.132
Li Y, Gao LM, Poudel RC, Li DZ, Forrest A (2011) High universality of matK primers for barcoding gymnosperms. J Syst Evol 49:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-6831.2011.00128.x
Forrest A (2012) DNA barcoding of plants: matK primers for mosses. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh
Forrest A (2012) DNA barcoding of plants: matK primers for ferns and allies. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh
Sang T, Crawford DJ, Stuessy TF (1997) Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Am J Bot 84:1120–1136. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446155
Tate JA, Simpson BB (2003) Paraphyly of Tarasa (Malvaceae) and diverse origins of the polyploid species. Syst Bot 28:723–737. https://doi.org/10.1043/02-64.1
Hamilton M (1999) Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. Mol Ecol 8:521–523
Li X, Yang Y, Henry RJ, Rossetto M, Wang Y, Chen S (2015) Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome. Biol Rev 90:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12104
Garrido-Sanz L, Senar MÀ, Piñol J (2019) Estimation of the relative abundance of species in artificial mixtures of insects using low-coverage shotgun metagenomics. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 4:e48281. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.48281
Nevill PG, Zhong X, Tonti-Filippini J, Byrne M, Hislop M, Thiele K, van Leeuwen S, Boykin LM, Small I (2020) Large-scale skimming from herbarium material for accurate plant identification and phylogenetics. Plant Methods 16:1. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0534-5
Wagemaker CAM, Mommer L, Visser EJW, Weigelt A, van Gurp TP, Postuma M, Smit-Tiekstra AE, de Kroon H (2021) msGBS: a new high-throughput approach to quantify the relative species abundance in root samples of multispecies plant communities. Mol Ecol Resour 21:1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13278
Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM). Contamination Prevention and Detection Guidelines for Forensic DNA Laboratories. January 12th, 2017. https://www.swgdam.org/_files/ugd/4344b0_c4d4dbba84f1400a98eaa2e48f2bf291.pdf
Miller DN, Bryant JE, Madsen EL, Ghiorse WC (1999) Evaluation and optimization of DNA extraction and purification procedures for soil and sediment samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(11):4715–4724. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.65.11.4715-4724.1999
Acknowledgments
This is publication number 23.07 of the Laboratory Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Names of commercial products and manufacturers are provided for information only and inclusion does not imply endorsement by the FBI or the US Government. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the FBI or the US Government.
Natalie Damaso is currently an MIT Lincoln Laboratory employee. No MIT Laboratory funding or resources were used to produce the result/findings reported in this publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Elwick, K.E., Damaso, N., Robertson, J.M. (2024). DNA Barcoding and Metabarcoding Protocols for Species Identification. In: DeSalle, R. (eds) DNA Barcoding. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2744. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3581-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3581-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3580-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3581-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols