Abstract
RNA functions are closely linked with their structures. Therefore, elucidating the secondary structure of RNAs provides crucial information regarding their function. The chemical modification or RNase-mediated digestion of single-stranded RNA has been utilized to experimentally reveal RNA secondary structures. Owing to advances in high-throughput sequencing technology and chemical analysis, RNA structural analyses that enable structural profiling at the transcriptomic scale in living cells have been developed. Here, we provide an overview of the high-throughput RNA structural (HTS) analyses and describe the computational processing steps of recent HTS analysis pipelines: PROBer, BUMHMM, and reactIDR.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sharp PA (2009) The centrality of RNA. Cell 136:577–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.007
Mortimer SA, Kidwell MA, Doudna JA (2014) Insights into RNA structure and function from genome-wide studies. Nat Rev Genet 15:469–479. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3681
Strobel EJ, Watters KE, Loughrey D, Lucks JB (2016) RNA systems biology: uniting functional discoveries and structural tools to understand global roles of RNAs. Curr Opin Biotechnol 39:182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.019
Wan Y, Kertesz M, Spitale RC et al (2011) Understanding the transcriptome through RNA structure. Nat Rev Genet 12:641–655. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3049
Mathews DH, Moss WN, Turner DH (2010) Folding and finding RNA secondary structure. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a003665
Spitale RC, Flynn RA, Torre EA et al (2014) RNA structural analysis by evolving SHAPE chemistry. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 5:867–881. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1253
Ding Y, Tang Y, Kwok CK et al (2014) In vivo genome-wide profiling of RNA secondary structure reveals novel regulatory features. Nature 505:696–700. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12756
Rouskin S, Zubradt M, Washietl S et al (2014) Genome-wide probing of RNA structure reveals active unfolding of mRNA structures in vivo. Nature 505:701–705. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12894
Wan Y, Qu K, Zhang QC et al (2014) Landscape and variation of RNA secondary structure across the human transcriptome. Nature 505:706–709. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12946
Lucks JB, Mortimer SA, Trapnell C et al (2011) Multiplexed RNA structure characterization with selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension sequencing (SHAPE-Seq). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:11063–11068. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106501108
Spitale RC, Crisalli P, Flynn RA et al (2013) RNA SHAPE analysis in living cells. Nat Chem Biol 9:18–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1131
Spitale RC, Flynn RA, Zhang QC et al (2015) Structural imprints in vivo decode RNA regulatory mechanisms. Nature 519:486–490. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14263
Siegfried NA, Busan S, Rice GM et al (2014) RNA motif discovery by SHAPE and mutational profiling (SHAPE-MaP). Nat Methods 11:959–965. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3029
Kertesz M, Wan Y, Mazor E et al (2010) Genome-wide measurement of RNA secondary structure in yeast. Nature 467:103–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09322
Choudhary K, Deng F, Aviran S (2017) Comparative and integrative analysis of RNA structural profiling data: current practices and emerging questions. Quant Biol 5:3–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40484-017-0093-6
Low JT, Weeks KM (2010) SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure prediction. Methods 52:150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.06.007
Incarnato D, Neri F, Anselmi F, Oliviero S (2014) Genome-wide profiling of mouse RNA secondary structures reveals key features of the mammalian transcriptome. Genome Biol 15:491. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0491-2
Aviran S, Trapnell C, Lucks JB et al (2011) Modeling and automation of sequencing-based characterization of RNA structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:11069–11074. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106541108
Hu X, Wong TKF, Lu ZJ et al (2014) Computational identification of protein binding sites on RNAs using high-throughput RNA structure-probing data. Bioinformatics 30:1049–1055. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt757
Li B, Tambe A, Aviran S, Pachter L (2017) PROBer provides a general toolkit for Analyzing sequencing-based Toeprinting assays. Cell Syst 4:568–574.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2017.04.007
Talkish J, May G, Lin Y et al (2014) Mod-seq: high-throughput sequencing for chemical probing of RNA structure. RNA 20:713–720. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.042218.113
Selega A, Sirocchi C, Iosub I et al (2017) Robust statistical modeling improves sensitivity of high-throughput RNA structure probing experiments. Nat Methods 14:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4068
Kawaguchi R, Kiryu H, Iwakiri J, Sese J (2019) reactIDR: evaluation of the statistical reproducibility of high-throughput structural analyses towards a robust RNA structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 20:130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2645-4
König J, Zarnack K, Rot G et al (2010) iCLIP reveals the function of hnRNP particles in splicing at individual nucleotide resolution. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:909–915. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1838
Carlile TM, Rojas-Duran MF, Zinshteyn B et al (2014) Pseudouridine profiling reveals regulated mRNA pseudouridylation in yeast and human cells. Nature 515:143–146. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13802
Zubradt M, Gupta P, Persad S et al (2016) DMS-MaPseq for genome-wide or targeted RNA structure probing in vivo. Nat Methods 14:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4057
Li C, Hatta M, Nidom CA et al (2010) Reassortment between avian H5N1 and human H3N2 influenza viruses creates hybrid viruses with substantial virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:4687–4692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912807107
Li Q, Brown JB, Huang H, Bickel PJ (2011) Measuring reproducibility of high-throughput experiments. Ann Appl Stat 5:1752–1779. https://doi.org/10.1214/11-AOAS466
Flynn RA, Zhang QC, Spitale RC et al (2016) Transcriptome-wide interrogation of RNA secondary structure in living cells with icSHAPE. Nat Protoc 11:273–290. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.011
Smola MJ, Rice GM, Busan S et al (2015) Selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension and mutational profiling (SHAPE-MaP) for direct, versatile and accurate RNA structure analysis. Nat Protoc 10:1643–1669. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.103
Ding Y, Kwok CK, Tang Y et al (2015) Genome-wide profiling of in vivo RNA structure at single-nucleotide resolution using structure-seq. Nat Protoc 10:1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.064
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A et al (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Takizawa, N. (2023). RNA Structure Determination by High-Throughput Structural Analysis. In: Kawaguchi, R.K., Iwakiri, J. (eds) RNA Structure Prediction. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2586. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2768-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2768-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2767-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2768-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols