Abstract
Extracting mechanistic knowledge from the spatial and temporal phenotypes of morphogenesis is a current challenge due to the complexity of biological regulation and their feedback loops. Furthermore, these regulatory interactions are also linked to the biophysical forces that shape a developing tissue, creating complex interactions responsible for emergent patterns and forms. Here we show how a computational systems biology approach can aid in the understanding of morphogenesis from a mechanistic perspective. This methodology integrates the modeling of tissues and whole-embryos with dynamical systems, the reverse engineering of parameters or even whole equations with machine learning, and the generation of precise computational predictions that can be tested at the bench. To implement and perform the computational steps in the methodology, we present user-friendly tools, computer code, and guidelines. The principles of this methodology are general and can be adapted to other model organisms to extract mechanistic knowledge of their morphogenesis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lobo D, Levin M (2017) Computing a worm: reverse-engineering planarian regeneration. In: Adamatzky A (ed) Advances in unconventional computing. Volume 2: prototypes, models and algorithms. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 637–654
Rubin BP, Brockes J, Galliot B et al (2015) A dynamic architecture of life. F1000Res 4:1288
Lobo D, Solano M, Bubenik GA et al (2014) A linear-encoding model explains the variability of the target morphology in regeneration. J R Soc Interface 11:20130918
McLaughlin KA, Levin M (2018) Bioelectric signaling in regeneration: mechanisms of ionic controls of growth and form. Dev Biol 433:177–189
Chiou K, Collins E-MS (2018) Why we need mechanics to understand animal regeneration. Dev Biol 433:155–165
Stiehl T, Marciniak-Czochra A (2017) Stem cell self-renewal in regeneration and cancer: insights from mathematical modeling. Curr Opin Syst Biol 5:112–120
Sharpe J (2017) Computer modeling in developmental biology: growing today, essential tomorrow. Development 144:4214–4225
Herath S, Lobo D (2020) Cross-inhibition of Turing patterns explains the self-organized regulatory mechanism of planarian fission. J Theor Biol 485:110042
Bartocci E, Lió P (2016) Computational modeling, formal analysis, and tools for systems biology. PLoS Comput Biol 12:e1004591
Kitano H (2002) Computational systems biology. Nature 420:206–210
Thieffry D (2007) Dynamical roles of biological regulatory circuits. Brief Bioinform 8:220–225
Jiménez A, Munteanu A, Sharpe J (2015) Dynamics of gene circuits shapes evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:201411065
Economou AD, Ohazama A, Porntaveetus T et al (2012) Periodic stripe formation by a Turing mechanism operating at growth zones in the mammalian palate. Nat Genet 44:348–351
Sheth R, Marcon L, Bastida MF et al (2012) Hox genes regulate digit patterning by controlling the wavelength of a Turing-type mechanism. Science 338:1476–1480
Prusinkiewicz P, Erasmus Y, Lane B et al (2007) Evolution and development of inflorescence architectures. Science 316:1452–1456
Jiménez A, Cotterell J, Munteanu A et al (2017) A spectrum of modularity in multi-functional gene circuits. Mol Syst Biol 13:925
Lobo D, Levin M (2015) Inferring regulatory networks from experimental morphological phenotypes: a computational method reverse-engineers planarian regeneration. PLoS Comput Biol 11:e1004295
Uzkudun M, Marcon L, Sharpe J (2015) Data-driven modelling of a gene regulatory network for cell fate decisions in the growing limb bud. Mol Syst Biol 11:815–815
Jaeger J, Crombach A (2012) Life’s attractors: understanding developmental systems through reverse engineering and in silico evolution. In: Soyer OS (ed) Evolutionary systems biology. Springer, New York, pp 93–119
Lobo D, Feldman EB, Shah M et al (2014) Limbform: a functional ontology-based database of limb regeneration experiments. Bioinformatics 30:3598–3600
Roy J, Cheung E, Bhatti J et al (2020) Curation and annotation of planarian gene expression patterns with segmented reference morphologies. Bioinformatics 36:2881–2887
Lobo D, Malone TJ, Levin M (2013) Planform: an application and database of graph-encoded planarian regenerative experiments. Bioinformatics 29:1098–1100
Emmons-Bell M, Durant F, Hammelman J et al (2015) Gap junctional blockade stochastically induces different species-specific head anatomies in genetically wild-type Girardia dorotocephala flatworms. Int J Mol Sci 16:27865–27896
Durant F, Lobo D, Hammelman J et al (2016) Physiological controls of large-scale patterning in planarian regeneration: a molecular and computational perspective on growth and form. Regeneration 3:78–102
Weiner R, Schmitt BA, Podhaisky H (1997) ROWMAP--a ROW-code with Krylov techniques for large stiff ODEs. Appl Numer Math 25:303–319
Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D et al (2019) STRING v11: protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D607–D613
Lobo D, Beane WS, Levin M (2012) Modeling planarian regeneration: a primer for reverse-engineering the worm. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002481
Azuaje F (2011) Computational discrete models of tissue growth and regeneration. Brief Bioinform 12:64–77
Plikus MV, Baker RE, Chen CC et al (2011) Self-organizing and stochastic behaviors during the regeneration of hair stem cells. Science 332:586–589
Lobo D, Vico FJ, Dassow J (2011) Graph grammars with string-regulated rewriting. Theor Comput Sci 412:6101–6111
García-Quismondo M, Levin M, Lobo D (2017) Modeling regenerative processes with membrane computing. Inf Sci (Ny) 381:229–249
Eskandari M, Kuhl E (2015) Systems biology and mechanics of growth. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 7:401–412
Marcon L, Sharpe J (2012) Turing patterns in development: what about the horse part? Curr Opin Genet Dev 22:578–584
Ko JM, Lobo D (2019) Continuous dynamic modeling of regulated cell adhesion: sorting, intercalation, and involution. Biophys J 117:2166–2179
Germann P, Marin-Riera M, Sharpe J (2019) Ya||a: GPU-powered spheroid models for mesenchyme and epithelium. Cell Syst 8:261–266.e3
Delile J, Herrmann M, Peyriéras N et al (2017) A cell-based computational model of early embryogenesis coupling mechanical behaviour and gene regulation. Nat Commun 8:13929
Mirams GR, Arthurs CJ, Bernabeu MO et al (2013) Chaste: an open source C++ library for computational physiology and biology. PLoS Comput Biol 9:e1002970
Song Y, Yang S, Lei JZ (2018) ParaCells: a GPU architecture for cell-centered models in computational biology. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinforma 5963:1–14
Ghaffarizadeh A, Heiland R, Friedman SH et al (2018) PhysiCell: an open source physics-based cell simulator for 3-D multicellular systems. PLoS Comput Biol 14:e1005991
Turing AM (1952) The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 237:37–72
Krieg M, Arboleda-Estudillo Y, Puech PH et al (2008) Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish. Nat Cell Biol 10:429–436
Maître J-L, Heisenberg C-P (2013) Three functions of Cadherins in cell adhesion. Curr Biol 23:R626–R633
Samanta D, Almo SC (2015) Nectin family of cell-adhesion molecules: structural and molecular aspects of function and specificity. Cell Mol Life Sci 72:645–658
Schier AF (2009) Nodal morphogens. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1:–a003459
Giger FA, David NB (2017) Endodermal germ-layer formation through active actin-driven migration triggered by N-cadherin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:201708116
Carvalho L, Heisenberg C-P (2010) The yolk syncytial layer in early zebrafish development. Trends Cell Biol 20:586–592
Rodaway A, Takeda H, Koshida S et al (1999) Induction of the mesendoderm in the zebrafish germ ring by yolk cell-derived TGF-beta family signals and discrimination of mesoderm and endoderm by FGF. Development 126:3067–3078
Montero J-A, Carvalho L, Wilsch-Bräuninger M et al (2005) Shield formation at the onset of zebrafish gastrulation. Development 132:1187–1198
Williams PH, Hagemann A, González-Gaitán M et al (2004) Visualizing long-range movement of the morphogen Xnr2 in the Xenopus embryo. Curr Biol 14:1916–1923
Stemmler MP, Koschorz B, Carney TJ et al (2009) The epithelial cell adhesion molecule EpCAM is required for epithelial morphogenesis and integrity during zebrafish epiboly and skin development. PLoS Genet 5:e1000563
Bruce AEE (2016) Zebrafish epiboly: spreading thin over the yolk. Dev Dyn 245:244–258
Lachnit M, Kur E, Driever W (2008) Alterations of the cytoskeleton in all three embryonic lineages contribute to the epiboly defect of Pou5f1/Oct4 deficient MZ spg zebrafish embryos. Dev Biol 315:1–17
Aster RC and Thurber CHCN-J or ABRRQ 8. . A (2012) Parameter estimation and inverse problems. Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Reali F, Priami C, Marchetti L (2017) Optimization algorithms for computational systems biology. Front Appl Math Stat 3
Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Michigan Univ. Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Lobikin M, Lobo D, Blackiston DJ et al (2015) Serotonergic regulation of melanocyte conversion: a bioelectrically regulated network for stochastic all-or-none hyperpigmentation. Sci Signal 8:ra99
Lobo D, Fernández JD, and Vico FJ (2012) Behavior-finding: morphogenetic designs shaped by function, In: Doursat, R., Sayama, H., and Michel, O. (eds.) Morphogenetic engineering, pp. 441–472 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Lobo D, Vico FJ (2010) Evolutionary development of tensegrity structures. Biosystems 101:167–176
Lobo D, Vico FJ (2010) Evolution of form and function in a model of differentiated multicellular organisms with gene regulatory networks. Biosystems 102:112–123
Henry A, Hemery M, François P (2018) φ-Evo: a program to evolve phenotypic models of biological networks. PLOS Comput Biol 14:e1006244
Fortin FA, De Rainville FM, Gardner MA et al (2012) DEAP: evolutionary algorithms made easy. J Mach Learn Res 13:2171–2175
Mohammadi A, Asadi H, Mohamed S et al (2017) OpenGA, a C++ genetic algorithm library. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey, pp 2051–2056
Budnikova M, Habig J, Lobo D et al (2014) Design of a flexible component gathering algorithm for converting cell-based models to graph representations for use in evolutionary search. BMC Bioinformatics 15:178
Mousavi R, Konuru SH, Lobo D (2021) Inference of Dynamic Spatial GRN Models with Multi-GPU Evolutionary Computation. Brief Bioinform 22:bbab104
Walton KD, Whidden M, Kolterud A et al (2015) Villification in the mouse: bmp signals control intestinal villus patterning. Development:734–764
Lobo D, Hammelman J, Levin M (2016) MoCha: molecular characterization of unknown pathways. J Comput Biol 23:291–297
Lobo D, Morokuma J, Levin M (2016) Computational discovery and in vivo validation of hnf4 as a regulatory gene in planarian regeneration. Bioinformatics 32:2681–2685
Lobo D, Lobikin M, Levin M (2017) Discovering novel phenotypes with automatically inferred dynamic models: a partial melanocyte conversion in Xenopus. Sci Rep 7:41339
Acknowledgments
We thank the members of the Lobo Lab for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number R35GM137953. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Contributions: J. K. wrote Subheading 3.2. R. M. wrote Subheading 3.3. D. L. wrote Subheadings 1, 3.1, 3.4, and 3.5. All authors revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Ko, J.M., Mousavi, R., Lobo, D. (2022). Computational Systems Biology of Morphogenesis. In: Cortassa, S., Aon, M.A. (eds) Computational Systems Biology in Medicine and Biotechnology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2399. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1831-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1831-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1830-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1831-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols