Abstract
Simultaneous measurement of 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) at the single-nucleotide level can be obtained by combining data from DNA processing methods including traditional bisulfite (BS), oxidative bisulfite (oxBS), or Tet-assisted (TAB) bisulfite conversion. Array-based technologies have been widely used in this task, due to their time and cost efficiency. For methylation studies using BS data, many protocols and related packages have been suggested in the literature to deal with limitations and confounders that arise from array data. In this chapter, we illustrate how the reader can make small adjustments to these protocols to obtain estimates of methylation and hydroxymethylation proportions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Booth MJ, Branco MR, Ficz G et al (2012) Quantitative sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at single-base resolution. Science 336:934–937. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1220671
Yu M, Hon G, Szulwach K et al (2012) Base-resolution analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian genome. Cell 149:1368–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.027
Nazor KL, Boland MJ, Bibikova M et al (2014) Application of a low cost array-based technique TAB-array for quantifying and mapping both 5mC and 5hmC at single base resolution in human pluripotent stem cells. Genomics 104:358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2014.08.014
Field DAB, Sarah F, Beraldi (2015) Accurate measurement of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in human cerebellum dna by oxidative bisulfite on an array (oxbs-array). PLoS One 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118202
Stewart SK, Morris TJ, Guilhamon P et al (2015) OxBS-450K: a method for analysing hydroxymethylation using 450K beadchips. Methods 72:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.08.009
Qu J, Zhou M, Song Q et al (2013) MLML: consistent simultaneous estimates of dna methylation and hydroxymethylation. Bioinformatics 29:2645–2646. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt459
Xu Z, Taylor JA, Leung Y-K et al (2016) OxBS-mle: an efficient method to estimate 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in paired bisulfite and oxidative bisulfite treated dna. Bioinformatics 32:3667–3669. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw527
Houseman EA, Johnson KC, Christensen BC (2016) OxyBS: estimation of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine from tandem-treated oxidative bisulfite and bisulfite DNA. Bioinformatics 32:2505–2507. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw158
Kiihl SF, Martinez-Garrido MJ, Domingo-Relloso A et al (2019) MLML2R: an r package for maximum likelihood estimation of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation proportions. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 18. https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2018-0031
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Huber W, Carey VJ, Gentleman R et al (2015) Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nat Methods 12:115–121
Aryee MJ, Jaffe AE, Corrada-Bravo H et al (2014) Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 30:1363–1369. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu049
Davis S, Meltzer P (2007) GEOquery: a bridge between the gene expression omnibus (geo) and bioconductor. Bioinformatics 14:1846–1847
Zeng C, Zhang Z, Wang J et al (2019) Application of the high-throughput tab-array for the discovery of novel 5-hydroxymethylcytosine biomarkers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Epigenomes 3:16. https://doi.org/10.3390/epigenomes3030016
Skvortsova K, Zotenko E, Luu P-L et al (2017) Comprehensive evaluation of genome-wide 5-hydroxymethylcytosine profiling approaches in human DNA. Epigenetics Chromatin 10:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-017-0123-7
Du P, Zhang X, Huang C-C et al (2010) Comparison of beta-value and m-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 11:587. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-587
Maksimovic J, Phipson B, Oshlack A (2017) A cross-package bioconductor workflow for analysing methylation array data [version 3; referees: 4 approved]. F1000Research 5:1281. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8839.3
Fortin J-P, Labbe A, Lemire M et al (2014) Functional normalization of 450k methylation array data improves replication in large cancer studies. Genome Biol 15:503. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0503-2
Teschendorff AE, Marabita F, Lechner M et al (2012) A beta-mixture quantile normalization method for correcting probe design bias in illumina infinium 450 k DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics 29:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts680
Niu L, Xu Z, Taylor JA (2016) RCP: a novel probe design bias correction method for illumina methylation BeadChip. Bioinformatics 32:2659–2663. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw285
Triche TJ, Weisenberger DJ, Van Den Berg D et al (2013) Low-level processing of Illumina Infinium DNA methylation BeadArrays. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e90. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt090
Maksimovic J, Gordon L, Oshlack A (2012) SWAN: subset-quantile within array normalization for illumina infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChips. Genome Biol 13:R44. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r44
Liu J, Siegmund KD (2016) An evaluation of processing methods for HumanMethylation450 BeadChip data. BMC Genomics 17:469. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2819-7
Pidsley R, Zotenko E, Peters TJ et al (2016) Critical evaluation of the illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol 17:208. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1066-1
Chen Y-A, Lemire M, Choufani S et al (2013) Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the illumina infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics 8:203–209. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.23470
Oytam Y, Sobhanmanesh F, Duesing K et al (2016) Risk-conscious correction of batch effects: maximising information extraction from high-throughput genomic datasets. BMC Bioinformatics 17:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1212-5
Johnson WE, Li C, Rabinovic A (2006) Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics 8:118–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037
Leek JT, Johnson WE, Parker HS et al (2012) The SVA package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics 28:882–883. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts034
Leek JT, Storey JD (2007) Capturing heterogeneity in gene expression studies by surrogate variable analysis. PLoS Genet 3:e161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030161
Gagnon-Bartsch JA, Speed TP (2011) Using control genes to correct for unwanted variation in microarray data. Biostatistics 13:539–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxr034
Salas LA, Koestler DC, Butler RA et al (2018) An optimized library for reference-based deconvolution of whole-blood biospecimens assayed using the illumina HumanMethylationEPIC BeadArray. Genome Biol 19:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1448-7
Salas LA, Koestler DC (2019) FlowSorted.Blood.EPIC: Illumina EPIC data on immunomagnetic sorted peripheral adultblood cells. Bioconductor. https://doi.org/10.18129/B9.bioc.FlowSorted.Blood.EPIC
Houseman EA, Accomando WP, Koestler DC et al (2012) DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC Bioinformatics 13:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-86
Jaffe AE (2019) FlowSorted.Blood.450k: Illumina humanmethylation data on sorted blood cell populations. Bioconductor. https://doi.org/10.18129/B9.bioc.FlowSorted.Blood.450k
Hicks SC, Irizarry RA (2019) methylCC: technology-independent estimation of cell type composition using differentially methylated regions. Genome Biol 20:261. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1827-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Kiihl, S.F. (2021). Bioinformatic Estimation of DNA Methylation and Hydroxymethylation Proportions. In: Bogdanovic, O., Vermeulen, M. (eds) TET Proteins and DNA Demethylation. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2272. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1294-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1294-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1293-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1294-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols