Abstract
Embryoid bodies (EBs) are aggregate of cells that contain three embryonic germ layers. They can be formed by direct differentiation from pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs), which serves as a useful model for understanding early embryo development. Due to the mixture of different cell types, it is necessary to investigate EBs at the single-cell level. Here, we describe a robust and straightforward method for single-cell gene expression profiling during mouse EB differentiation from mouse ESCs (mESCs). The protocol is modified from a widely used method in the SMART-seq family, which only requires standard molecular biology techniques and lab equipment. It allows for accurate 3′ counting of transcript at the single-cell level, which helps reveal cellular identities during EB formation. Combined with perturbation experiments, the method provides an opportunity for mechanistic studies of embryo development at the single-cell level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Smith AG (2001) Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men. Cell Dev Biol 17:435–462. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.435
Evans MJ, Kaufman MH (1981) Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292:154–156. https://doi.org/10.1038/292154a0
Martin GR (1981) Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78:7634–7638. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.12.7634
Ying Q-L, Wray J, Nichols J et al (2008) The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453:519–523. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06968
Doetschman TC, Eistetter H, Katz M et al (1985) The in vitro development of blastocyst-derived embryonic stem cell lines: formation of visceral yolk sac, blood islands and myocardium. J Embryol Exp Morph 87:27–45. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.87.1.27
Chen X, Teichmann SA, Meyer KB (2018) From tissues to cell types and back: single-cell gene expression analysis of tissue architecture. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci 1:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013452
Clark SJ, Lee HJ, Smallwood SA et al (2016) Single-cell epigenomics: powerful new methods for understanding gene regulation and cell identity. Genome Biol 17:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0944-x
Wang Y, Navin NE (2015) Advances and applications of single-cell sequencing technologies. Mol Cell 58:598–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.005
Tang F, Barbacioru C, Wang Y et al (2009) mRNA-seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat Methods 6:377–382. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1315
Tang F, Barbacioru C, Bao S et al (2010) Tracing the derivation of embryonic stem cells from the inner cell mass by single-cell RNA-seq analysis. Cell Stem Cell 6:468–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.03.015
Macosko EZ, Basu A, Satija R et al (2015) Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161:1202–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002
Klein AM, Mazutis L, Akartuna I et al (2015) Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161:1187–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044
Gierahn TM, Wadsworth MH, Hughes TK et al (2017) Seq-well: portable, low-cost RNA sequencing of single cells at high throughput. Nat Methods 14:395–398. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4179
Han X, Wang R, Zhou Y et al (2018) Mapping the mouse cell atlas by Microwell-seq. Cell 172:1091–1107.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.001
Zheng GXY, Terry JM, Belgrader P et al (2017) Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun 8:14049. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14049
Jaitin DA, Kenigsberg E, Keren-Shaul H et al (2014) Massively parallel single-cell RNA-seq for marker-free decomposition of tissues into cell types. Science 343:776–779. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1247651
Islam S, Kjällquist U, Moliner A et al (2011) Characterization of the single-cell transcriptional landscape by highly multiplex RNA-seq. Genome Res 21:1160–1167. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.110882.110
Ramsköld D, Luo S, Wang Y-C et al (2012) Full-length mRNA-seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells. Nat Biotechnol 30:777–782. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2282
Picelli S, Björklund ÅK, Faridani OR et al (2013) Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat Methods 10:1096–1098. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2639
Hagemann-Jensen M, Ziegenhain C, Chen P et al (2020) Single-cell RNA counting at allele and isoform resolution using Smart-seq3. Nat Biotechnol 38:708–714. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0497-0
Sasagawa Y, Danno H, Takada H et al (2018) Quartz-Seq2: a high-throughput single-cell RNA-sequencing method that effectively uses limited sequence reads. Genome Biol 19:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1407-3
Hashimshony T, Senderovich N, Avital G et al (2016) CEL-Seq2: sensitive highly-multiplexed single-cell RNA-seq. Genome Biol 17:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0938-8
Bagnoli JW, Ziegenhain C, Janjic A et al (2018) Sensitive and powerful single-cell RNA sequencing using mcSCRB-seq. Nat Commun 9:2937. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05347-6
Cao J, Packer JS, Ramani V et al (2017) Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science 357:661–667. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8940
Rosenberg AB, Roco CM, Muscat RA et al (2018) Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding. Science 360:eaam8999. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8999
Scialdone A, Tanaka Y, Jawaid W et al (2016) Resolving early mesoderm diversification through single-cell expression profiling. Nature 535:289–293. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18633
Mohammed H, Hernando-Herraez I, Savino A et al (2017) Single-cell landscape of transcriptional heterogeneity and cell fate decisions during mouse early gastrulation. Cell Rep 20:1215–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.009
Cao J, Spielmann M, Qiu X et al (2019) The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature 566:496–502. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0969-x
Pijuan-Sala B, Griffiths JA, Guibentif C et al (2019) A single-cell molecular map of mouse gastrulation and early organogenesis. Nature 566:490–495. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0933-9
Kolodziejczyk AA, Kim JK, Tsang JCH et al (2015) Single cell RNA-sequencing of pluripotent states unlocks modular transcriptional variation. Cell Stem Cell 17:471–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2015.09.011
Gao X, Nowak-Imialek M, Chen X et al (2019) Establishment of porcine and human expanded potential stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 21:687–699. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-019-0333-2
Spangler A, Su EY, Craft AM, Cahan P (2018) A single cell transcriptional portrait of embryoid body differentiation and comparison to progenitors of the developing embryo. Stem Cell Res 31:201–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2018.07.022
Kim IS, Wu J, Rahme GJ et al (2020) Parallel single-cell RNA-seq and genetic recording reveals lineage decisions in developing embryoid bodies. Cell Rep 33:108222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108222
Kaminow B, Yunusov D, Dobin A (2021) STARsolo: accurate, fast and versatile mapping/quantification of single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq data. Biorxiv 2021.05.05.442755. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.05.442755
Satija R, Farrell JA, Gennert D et al (2015) Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat Biotechnol 33:495–502. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3192
Wolf FA, Angerer P, Theis FJ (2018) SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol 19:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0
Becht E, McInnes L, Healy J et al (2019) Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat Biotechnol 37:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4314
Traag VA, Waltman L, van Eck NJ (2019) From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci Rep 9:5233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z
Picelli S, Björklund ÅK, Reinius B et al (2014) Tn5 transposase and tagmentation procedures for massively scaled sequencing projects. Genome Res 24:2033–2040. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.177881.114
Melsted P, Booeshaghi AS, Liu L et al (2021) Modular, efficient and constant-memory single-cell RNA-seq preprocessing. Nat Biotechnol 39(7):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00870-2
Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS et al (2002) The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res 12:996–1006. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.229102
Frankish A, Diekhans M, Ferreira A-M et al (2018) GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 47(D1):D766–D773. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky955
Acknowledgments
We thank all members from the Chen lab and the Zhang lab for the helpful comments on the manuscript. The work was supported by Shenzhen Science And Technology Innovation Committee (ZDSYS20200811144002008) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970812). The computational work was supported by Center for Computational Science and Engineering at Southern University of Science and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Zheng, J., Ye, Y., Xu, Q., Xu, W., Zhang, W., Chen, X. (2021). A Modified SMART-Seq Method for Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Embryoid Body Differentiation. In: Turksen, K. (eds) Embryonic Stem Cell Protocols . Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2520. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2021_435
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2021_435
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2436-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2437-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols