Abstract
Pituitary tumors (PTs) are a heterogeneous group of lesions of the central nervous system that are usually benign. Most of them occur sporadically, but 5% can do so within family syndromes, usually at a young age. There are differences by sex, age, race, and genetic factors in the prevalence of different tumor cell types and clinical presentation. Functioning-PTs (FPTs) are usually diagnosed earlier than non-functioning PTs (NFPTs). However, this depends on the PT type. Headaches and visual disturbances are the most frequent mass-effect symptoms, but seizures or hydrocephalus may also occur. Pituitary apoplexy is another possible mode of presentation, and it requires special attention because of its potential severity. PTs in pregnancy, childhood, and old age present a series of clinical peculiarities that must be taken into account when evaluating these patients. Ectopic PTs (EPTs) are uncommon and share the same clinical-epidemiological data as eutopic PTs, but, depending on their location, other types of clinical manifestations may appear. Silent PTs are often detected as an incidentaloma or due to neurologic symptoms related to mass-effect. Aggressive PTs and pituitary carcinomas (PCs), which are very rare, are characterized by multiple local recurrences and metastases, respectively. This review addresses the epidemiology and clinical presentation of PTs, from the classical hormonal and mass-effect symptoms to the different rare presentations, such as pituitary apoplexy, hydrocephalus, or diabetes insipidus. Moreover, special situations of the presentation of PTs are discussed, namely, PTs in pregnancy, childhood, and the elderly, EPTs, silent and aggressive PTs, and PCs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Recently, the European Pituitary Pathology Group (EPPG) proposed the replacement of adenoma with the term pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) to better reflect the similarities between adenohypophyseal and neuroendocrine tumors of other organs [1]. They contend that pituitary endocrine neoplasms exhibit a spectrum of behaviors that are not entirely benign and can cause significant morbidity, even when they are not metastatic. For safe and accurate diagnosis of PitNETs, the EPPG recommends a multi-step approach, including clinical and neuroimaging features, immunohistochemistry for hormones and pituitary transcription factors, assessment of proliferation, and, when indicated, the use of markers predictive of treatment response [1]. Taking into account the EPPG proposal and the fact that a small subgroup of high-risk pituitary adenomas are not entirely benign, while the majority do not behave like neuroendocrine tumors, the Pituitary Society has recently addressed this issue through a position statement. They suggest that the proposed PitNET nomenclature does not advance patient care, plays only a small role in guiding decision-making, and will likely lead to unnecessary patient concerns. They conclude that there is not yet a compelling case to call pituitary adenomas/tumors other than what they are [2].
PTs are a heterogeneous group of lesions of the central nervous system (CNS) that are usually benign [3]. They are relatively common, the overall estimated prevalence of PTs in the general population being estimated to being 16.7% [4]. Their frequency varies greatly according to age and sex, although they are slightly more frequent in females and between the ages of 40 and 60 years [5]. Even though most of them (95%) arise sporadically, up to 5% of PTs could be related to familial pituitary tumor syndromes, the most frequent of them being multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) syndrome [6,7,8,9,10,11].
PTs can develop a wide clinical spectrum (Fig. 2). Some PTs cause prominent symptoms, while others may result in slowly developing, insidious, non-specific complaints, thus delaying accurate diagnosis. Many PTs remain symptomless and are detected only incidentally (pituitary incidentalomas) [3]. Functional PTs (FPTs) present mainly as Cushing’s syndrome, acromegaly/gigantism, hyperthyroidism, or hypogonadism due to hyperprolactinemia [12].
The diagnosis of PTs during pregnancy, old age, or childhood and adolescence can be a great diagnostic challenge due to the presence of atypical clinical data that can be confused with those of other clinical or even physiological conditions in some of these age groups [13,14,15]. Ectopic PTs (EPTs) also present clinical peculiarities related to their localization [16]. Silent PTs (SPTs) can be clinically silent or totally silent depending on whether or not, respectively, they secrete hormonal products in excess that can be detected by biochemical testing [17]. Aggressive PTs (APTs) present as radiologically invasive tumors and an unusually rapid tumor growth rate, or clinically relevant tumor growth despite optimal standard therapies [18]. Pituitary carcinomas (PCs) are defined as adenohypophyseal tumors with metastatic activity within and outside the boundaries of the CNS [19].
This review focuses on the epidemiology and clinical presentation of PTs, from their classical hormonal and mass-effect-symptoms to their different rare clinical presentations. Moreover, special situations of the presentation of PTs are discussed, namely, PTs in pregnancy, childhood and old age, EPTs, SPTs, APTs, and PCs.
Epidemiology
PTs were considered rare, but recent studies have shown that the prevalence is higher than previously thought, this being due to the increase in and improvement of diagnostic tests [3, 20]. Data from cancer registries report a prevalence of approximately 130–230 cases per 100,000 population, while population studies estimate a prevalence of 190–280 cases per million [21]. They are the second most frequent intracranial neoplasm behind meningiomas. Radiological series report PTs in up to 40% of the studies and autopsies in up to 35% [4]; macroincidentalomas were found in 0.2% of patients who underwent CT scans for CNS symptoms [22], and by MRI, in 0.16% of a population study cohort [23].
The highest incidence of PTs is in the 40–60-year age group [3]. The incidence of PTs depends on tumor type, sex, and race. For instance, prolactinomas tend to manifest earlier than NFPTs [24], while the incidence of prolactinomas tends to decrease with aging [24]. The most common PTs in early childhood are ACTH-secreting PTs; between the ages of 20 and 40 years, prolactinomas, followed by NFPTs, are the most frequent [5].
Tumor distribution varies in the different population-based studies. Agustsson [25] et al. in their series of 471 patients identified NFPTs (43.0%) as the most prevalent PT, followed by prolactinoma (39.9%); Fernández et al. [26] in their population study, in the 63 patients with PTs described, found prolactinomas in 57%, NFPTs in 28%, followed by other PTs less frequently; in Clayton’s study [27], 31.6–35.7% had prolactinomas and 32.1–36.8% had NFPTs, while Daly [28] reported prolactinomas in 66% of patients, and secondly NFPTs (14.7%).
Pituitary tumors in hereditary syndromes
Although most PTs are considered sporadic tumors, in younger patients or in the presence of other endocrinopathies, a hereditary origin should be suspected. Approximately 5% of all cases [7] occurs in the context of hereditary syndromes, such as MEN1 syndrome (MEN1 mutations), Carney complex (PRKAR1A mutations), and familial isolated pituitary adenomas (AIP mutations). Moreover, PTs can be seen in McCune-Albright syndrome (postzygotic mosaic mutations of the GNAS gene), MEN4 syndrome (CDKN1B mutations), isolated familial somatotropinoma (AIP mutations), patients presenting succinate dehydrogenase mutations, and DICER1 syndrome, among others [7, 8] (Table 1).
Regarding sex distribution, there is a female preponderance in prolactinomas, ACTH-secreting PTs, and TSH-secreting PTs; NFPTs and GH-releasing PTs occur mostly in males [25,26,27,28]. In older age groups, all PT types, except for NFPTs, tend to assume a more balanced gender distribution [5].
In addition, racial differences have been reported. Black women have a three times higher incidence of PTs than white women, while incidence rates for black men were four times higher than for white men [29]. The epidemiological study of Gittleman et al. also found a higher risk of PTs in blacks, while the average incidence for whites and blacks was 2.6 and 4.8, respectively [30].
Clinical presentation of pituitary tumors
Hormonal manifestations
Functional PTs account for approximately 48–78% of PTs [26, 31]. They present mainly as Cushing syndrome (CS), acromegaly/gigantism, or hyperthyroidism (Table 2). Drange et al. reported a mean time delay from onset to diagnosis of 3.0 ± 3.9 years for prolactinomas and 7.2 ± 7.7 years for GH-secreting PTs [12].
Mass-effect manifestations
The most frequent mass-effect-related symptom is visual impairment, which may appear in 13–60.8% of patients with NFPTs [37]. In MEN1 patients, PTs are two times more likely to be macroadenomas than in cases of sporadic PTs patients (85% vs. 42%, respectively); hence, tumor signs caused by local compression are more common in these cases [9] (Fig. 2(4)).
Classic visual impairment manifests as visual hemianopia, but it should be taken into account that PTs can grow asymmetrically and cause different types of campimetric involvement, or even loss of visual acuity or color vision (mainly green and red) secondary to optic nerve compression [38, 39]. Visual field defects and decreased vision occur in 9–32% and 4–16% of patients with PTs, respectively [40]. Less frequently (< 5%), diplopia may occur due to involvement of oculomotor nerves in the cavernous sinus, usually associated with large or fast-growing PTs or PA [37](Fig. 2(2)). Visual disturbances tend to correlate with tumor size; microadenomas do not impact vision and macroadenomas measuring < 2 cm are unlikely to cause significant visual impairment [38], but if the macroadenoma extends suprasellarly, it may compress the optic chiasm and cause visual impairment.
Headache is one of the most common initial compressive symptoms (37–70%) and, as, with other intracranial neoplasms, the presentation of headaches in PTs often resembles primary headaches, such as migraine or tension-type headache [41]. However, it is often difficult to determine the true relationship between pituitary injury and headache [41]. Headaches are believed to result from stretching of the dural sheath but do not necessarily correlate with tumor size [42]. Among FPTs, growth hormone (GH)–secreting PTs and prolactinomas have been specifically associated with headache, possibly mediated by the change in endocrine status rather than the pituitary mass per se [43].
Other symptoms arising from mass-effect are those related to hypopituitarism (or, in the case of hyperprolactinemia, due to inhibition of the pulsatile secretion of LH, leading to inadequate gonadal stimulation), which are present in 71% of prolactinomas and 44% of NFPTs [12]. Gonadotropic function (libido and sexual function) is usually the first affected, followed by somatotropic, thyrotropic, and corticotropic functions.
Rarely, the first clinical manifestation of a PT is diabetes insipidus (DI), as a result of neurohypophysis and/or pituitary stalk compression [14, 44] (Fig. 2(1)). However, an acute onset of isolated DI is almost never seen in PTs and should always orient the diagnosis toward a lesion involving the hypothalamic-hypophyseal axis, with other possibilities including craniopharyngiomas, Rathke cleft cysts, metastasis, and germ-cell tumors.
Large tumors with posterosuperior expansion toward the third ventricle may induce obstructive hydrocephalus. As a consequence, intracranial pressure is increased, and several symptoms, such as headache, nausea, papilledema, loss of bladder control, memory loss, poor coordination or balance, irritability, change in personality, problems with attention, sleepiness, or coma, may develop [45] (Fig. 2(6)). On the other hand, in the context of giant PTs, frontal lobe invasion may be associated with the following: generalized seizures [46] or even dementia [47]; anterior extension with nasal obstruction, headaches, recurrent nose bleeds, and/or rhinorrhea; inferior extension with craniocervical joint instability; and posterior extension with brainstem compression and cerebellar syndrome [45].
Pituitary incidentaloma
Pituitary incidentalomas are detected either at autopsy or as incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head, or computed tomography (CT) scans performed for other reasons not related to pituitary symptoms [48, 49]. In other words, the imaging studies are not conducted for a symptom specifically related to the lesion, such as visual loss, or a clinical manifestation of hormone excess, but rather for the evaluation of symptoms such as headache, or other neurological or CNS complaints, or head trauma [48].
Pituitary incidentalomas have been found in 14.4% of postmortem studies and 22.5% of radiography studies [4], although their prevalence depends on the definition used in the different studies. They are distributed equally throughout the age groups (range, 16–86 years) and between the sexes [49]. Although most are either gonadotroph PTs or NFPTs, some may be silent lactotroph, somatotroph, or corticotroph PTs. Generally, they are smaller than 1 cm and remain stable throughout the follow-up. However, 10.6% of microadenomas and 24% of macroadenomas may grow; therefore, periodic surveillance by MRI is recommended for up to 20 years [49].
Pituitary apoplexy
A rare form of presentation requiring special attention is pituitary apoplexy (PA), characterized by a sudden onset of headache, loss of vision, or hypopituitarism due to intratumoral hemorrhage or pituitary infarction [50]. It occurs in 2–12% of patients with PTs. In a patient harboring a PT, it most often occurs in the context of a clinically non-functioning macroadenoma [51, 52]. It can occur at all ages, but is more frequent between the fifth and sixth decade and slightly more common in males.
In 20–40% of the patients, precipitating factors are identified, such as anticoagulation, provocative pituitary tests, or surgery (Fig. 1). The most common presenting symptoms include headache (80%), nausea, diminished visual acuity or visual field (50%), ophthalmoplegia/paresis, and impaired mental status. At least one anterior pituitary deficiency is always present at PA onset. Corticotropic deficiency is the most common and important deficit in patients with PA, affecting 60 to 80% of patients [51] (Fig. 2(3 and 5)).
The diagnosis of PA is clinical, requiring both acute onset of symptoms, including vision loss, hypopituitarism, and/or severe headaches, as well as a hemorrhagic or infarcted pituitary lesion (Fig. 1) [53]. The evolution of PA is difficult to predict: the patient can deteriorate dramatically (subarachnoid hemorrhage from an apoplectic adenoma or cerebral ischemia secondary to cerebral vasospasm have been reported) or improve spontaneously, with or without any sequelae. PA can destroy the PT, although regrowth from a tumor remnant is possible [54].
Special situations
Pituitary tumors in pregnancy
Prolactinomas are the most common PTs diagnosed during pregnancy, followed by GH-producing PTs. During pregnancy, 2.7% of microprolactinomas, 22.9% of untreated macroprolactinomas, and 4.8% of previously treated macroprolactinomas may grow and produce mass-effect symptoms or hypopituitarism [13] (Fig. 2(3)). In acromegalic patients, biochemical control tends to improve despite the withdrawal of somatostatin analog therapy during pregnancy [55]. The occurrence of pregnancy in women with Cushing’s disease (CD) is very unusual (there are fewer than 100 cases of CD during pregnancy reported in the literature), due to the deleterious effects of the disease on fertility [56]. Clinical diagnosis is more difficult than in non-pregnant women: indeed, some of the clinical signs of hypercortisolism overlap with classical signs observed during pregnancy, such as fatigue, weight gain, hirsutism, acne, and emotional instability. The combination of these three’s CS signs (hypertension, ecchymosis, and muscle weakness) during pregnancy increases the suspicion of CD [56]. TSH-secreting PTs and NFPTs are very rare during pregnancy; they usually present as hyperthyroidism and mass-effect symptoms, respectively (Table 3). In general, the risk of hypopituitarism and relevant symptomatic growth during pregnancy is low in previously treated adenomas [13].
Pituitary tumors in childhood and adolescence
PTs in children and adolescents are rare tumors (5% of PTs) that often result from a tumor predisposition syndrome [14] (Table 1). They are more commonly diagnosed in females (2:1). PTs are typically benign, with prolactinomas as the most frequently encountered tumors (mostly teenagers), followed by corticotropinomas and somatotropinomas [57]. NFPTs represent only 5–10.5% of PTs in this age group.
Prolactinomas occur mainly in females (5:1) and present with primary or secondary amenorrhea; mass-effect symptoms are more frequent in men [58] (Fig. 2(2)). CD has a peak of incidence at the onset of puberty, and a female predominance, with a ratio of 3:1. In most children, the onset of CS is insidious and the most common presenting symptom is weight gain; in childhood, the lack of height gain with concomitant weight gain is the most common presentation of CS [59, 60]. Compared with CS in adults, sleep disruption, muscular weakness, myopathy, and problems with memory are less commonly seen in children. Moreover, skin striae are very rarely present before the age of 5–7 years of age [59]. GH-secreting PTs are uncommon; they often present in prepubertal children and infants, with a slight preponderance in males (2:1). If the clinical syndrome develops before the fusion of long bone growth plates, it is referred to as gigantism, and, if it presents after that stage, acromegaly [61]. TSH-secreting PTs are very rare in children. They present with the general signs of hyperthyroidism and usually manifest as macroadenomas with symptoms of mass-effect. NFPTs are usually discovered incidentally, in contrast to the case of adults, where they usually present with compressive symptoms. For example, in children, visual dysfunction occurs in fewer than 10% of cases [62].
Pituitary tumors in the elderly
PTs are one of the CNS tumors whose incidence increases with age [24]. Moreover, the increased life expectancy in the general population is causing a rapid growth in the number of elderly patients with associated diseases. PTs in the elderly (above 65 years) represent less than 10% of all PTs. NFPTs are the most common type of PTs in this age group [15]. However, their incidence is probably underestimated, since the clinical presentation of PTs in the elderly differs from that in younger patients. Some endocrinological and neurological manifestations related to PTs could be misunderstood as age-related disturbances [15]. For example, hypopituitarism symptoms are difficult to identify because they can mimic those of aging. Hypogonadism symptoms are often overlooked, and the tumors are usually diagnosed as very large macroadenomas with mass-effect symptoms, such as visual deficits (Fig. 2(6)). In the same way, visual impairment due to chiasm compression can be easily confused with other age-related ophthalmological pathologies, such as cataract, macular degeneration, and vascular ocular diseases. Symptoms of acromegaly and CS in elderly patients are usually mild, while other findings, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, asthenia, and mood depression, may not be correctly interpreted because of the high prevalence of these symptoms in elderly subjects [15]. The primary presenting symptoms in the majority of these patients are a reduction in visual acuity or a field defect [63].
Ectopic pituitary tumors
EPTs are rare tumors described predominantly through case reports. Approximately 60% of them are seen in the sphenoid sinus and suprasellar region, and 30% are found in other locations, such as the clivus, nasal cavity, cavernous sinus, parasellar region, and sphenoid wing [16]. Patients with EPTs share a similar endocrine, age, and sex profile with those who have typical PTs. Sphenoid sinus EPTs present more frequently in the fourth to seventh decades of life, and women are affected more commonly than men [64]. Seventy-five percent of them are functioning EPTs (mostly ACTH and prolactin-secreting PTs) [65].
The symptomatology depends on the involvement of adjacent structures and hormonal activity [64]. Visual disturbances and facial paresthesia may occur due to compression of the cranial nerves by the tumor extending into the cavernous sinus or clivus. Sphenoid sinus EPTs can present with nasal obstruction, headache, and cerebrospinal fluid leak [66]. The common hormonal manifestations include hyperprolactinemia, CS, and acromegaly. Around 25% of EPTs are hormonally inactive [66].
Silent pituitary tumors
SPTs represent 37% of all PTs [67]. The mean age of patients and the female/male ratio is similar to those reported for PTs in general [68]. PTs can either lack secretion of a sufficient level of hormonal product to increase the serum concentration (totally silent) or can secrete hormonal products that do not cause clinical symptoms or signs that are usual for that hormone (clinically silent) [17]. The most frequent types are gonadotroph PTs (43%) [69] and null-cell PTs (33.7%). Clinically silent somatotroph PTs and clinically silent corticotroph PTs follow in frequency [17].
As the majority of SPTs are macroadenoma at diagnosis, two of the most common presenting symptoms are headache and visual field deficits [17]. Pituitary hormone deficiencies occur in up to 67% of patients [70]. Although rare, some cases may progress to a clinically apparent PT, especially in silent corticotroph PTs [71]. Patients with silent corticotroph PTs should be followed up carefully, as these tumors are associated with increased aggressiveness and higher recurrence rate compared with NFPTs [72]. Furthermore, since almost two-thirds of silent somatotroph PTs are mixed GH-prolactin PTs and sparsely granulated monohormonal GH PTs, recurrence and need for radiation is higher than for other NFPTs; thus, close follow-up is also warranted in these cases [73].
Aggressive pituitary tumors and pituitary carcinomas
APTs and PCs do not respond to standard medical treatment. APTs, which represent 15% of all PTs, are PTs exhibiting rapid growth, resistance to conventional treatments, and/or early/multiple recurrences. PCs represent 0.1–0.2% of all PTs and are defined by non-contiguous craniospinal or distant metastasis [18]. APTs are more frequently seen in younger rather than older adults [74]. Their development is more likely in certain tumor subtypes, such as silent corticotroph PTs, Crooke’s cell PTs, and plurihormonal PIT-1 positive PTs. PCs typically present in the fourth to sixth decades of life, and the commonest PC subtypes are corticotroph and lactotroph neoplasms [75]. Some studies have found no gender predilection in APTs and PCs [75], while others have reported a slightly male [76] or female [77] predilection.
Regarding clinical presentation, there are some symptoms, such as headache and visual field loss, that overlap between APTs/PCs and PTs, in general, while cranial nerve palsies and obstructive hydrocephalus are more suspicious for APTs/PCs [77]. PCs are diagnosed with a delay of 6.5–9 years, but this is variable, depending on the type of endocrine function of the tumor (9.5 in corticotroph PCs and 4.7 years in prolactin PCs) [78]. In these patients, metastases may lead to other site-specific clinical symptoms, such as hearing loss, ataxia, motor weakness, and liver function derangement [79].
Conclusions
Pituitary tumors usually occur sporadically at the age of 40–50 years, but 5% may do so within family syndromes, usually at an early age. There are differences by sex, age, race, and genetic factors in the prevalence of different tumor cell types and the form of clinical presentation.
Patients with FPTs are usually diagnosed before NFPT patients due to early symptomatology. However, this depends on the tumor type. Mass-effect symptoms are most frequent in NFPTs, headaches and visual disturbances, although other manifestations, such as seizures or hydrocephalus, may occur. Another possible form of presentation, which requires special attention because of its potential life-threatening risk if it is not diagnosed, is pituitary apoplexy.
Some biological situations may further complicate clinical recognition of PTs, such as in pregnancy or in elderly patients. PTs in adolescence and childhood and those of ectopic location also present a series of peculiarities that must be taken into account. Silent PTs usually present as macroadenomas, and aggressive PTs and PCs are associated with a higher recurrence rate.
References
Villa C, Vasiljevic A, Jaffrain-Rea ML et al (2019) A standardised diagnostic approach to pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs): a European Pituitary Pathology Group (EPPG) proposal. Virchows Arch. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-019-02655-0
Ho KKY, Fleseriu M, Wass J et al (2019) A tale of pituitary adenomas: to NET or not to NET. Pituitary. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-019-00988-2
Aflorei ED, Korbonits M (2014) Epidemiology and etiopathogenesis of pituitary adenomas. J Neuro-Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1354-5
Ezzat S, Asa SL, Couldwell WT, Barr CE, Dodge WE, Vance ML, McCutcheon IE (2004) The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Cancer 101(3):613–619
Mindermann T, Wilson CB (1994) Age-related and gender-related occurrence of pituitary adenomas. Clin Endocrinol 41(3):359–364
Beckers A, Daly AF (2007) The clinical, pathological, and genetic features of familial isolated pituitary adenomas. Eur J Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-07-0348
Solari D, Pivonello R, Caggiano C, Guadagno E, Chiaramonte C, Miccoli G, Cavallo LM, Del Basso De Caro M, Colao A, Cappabianca P (2019) Pituitary adenomas: what are the key features? What are the current treatments? Where is the future taking us? World Neurosurg 127:695–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.049
Alrezk R, Hannah-Shmouni F, Stratakis CA (2017) MEN4 and CDKN1B mutations: the latest of the MEN syndromes. Endocr Relat Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-17-0243
Vasilev V, Daly AF, Petrossians P, Zacharieva S, Beckers A (2011) Familial pituitary tumor syndromes. Endocr Pract 17(Suppl 3):41–46. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP11064.RA
Shaid M, Korbonits M (2017 May-Jun) Genetics of pituitary adenomas. Neurol India 65(3):577–587. https://doi.org/10.4103/neuroindia.NI_330_17
Pepe S, Korbonits M, Iacovazzo D (2019) Germline and mosaic mutations causing pituitary tumours: genetic and molecular aspects. J Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-18-0446
Drange MR, Fram NR, Herman-Bonert V, Melmed S (2000) Pituitary tumor registry: a novel clinical resource. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.85.1.168
Karaca Z, Yarman S, Ozbas I et al (2018) How does pregnancy affect the patients with pituitary adenomas: a study on 113 pregnancies from Turkey. J Endocrinol Investig. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-017-0709-8
Perry A, Graffeo CS, Marcellino C, Pollock BE, Wetjen NM, Meyer FB (2018) Pediatric pituitary adenoma: case series, review of the literature, and a skull base treatment paradigm. J Neurol Surg Part B Skull Base. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1625984
Minniti G, Esposito V, Piccirilli M, Fratticci A, Santoro A, Jaffrain-Rea ML (2005) Diagnosis and management of pituitary tumours in the elderly: a review based on personal experience and evidence of literature. Eur J Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.1.02030
Agely A, Okromelidze L, Vilanilam GK, Chaichana KL, Middlebrooks EH, Gupta V (2019) Ectopic pituitary adenomas: common presentations of a rare entity. Pituitary. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-019-00954-y
Mayson SE, Snyder PJ (2015) Silent pituitary adenomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2014.11.001
Raverot G, Trouillas J, Burman P, McCormack A, Heaney A, Petersenn S, Popovic V, Dekkers OM (2018 Jan) European society of endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the management of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas. Eur J Endocrinol 178(1):G1–G24. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-0796
Lloyd RV, Osamura YR, Kloppel G, Rosai J (2017) WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs. WHO Press
Nilsson B, Gustavsson-Kadaka E, Bengtsson BÅ, Jonsson B (2000) Pituitary adenomas in Sweden between 1958 and 1991: incidence, survival, and mortality. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.85.4.1420
Daly AF, Tichomirowa MA, Beckers A (2009) The epidemiology and genetics of pituitary adenomas. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2009.05.008
Nammour GM, Ybarra J, Naheedy MH, Romeo JH, Aron DC (1997) Incidental pituitary macroadenoma: a population-based study. Am J Med Sci 314(5):287–291
Yue NC, Longstreth WT, Elster AD, Jungreis CA, O’Leary DH, Poirier VC (1997) Clinically serious abnormalities found incidentally at MR imaging of the brain: data from the Cardiovascular Health Study. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988190
McDowell BD, Wallace RB, Carnahan RM, Chrischilles EA, Lynch CF, Schlechte JA (2011) Demographic differences in incidence for pituitary adenoma. Pituitary. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-010-0253-4
Agustsson TT, Baldvinsdottir T, Jonasson JG, Olafsdottir E, Steinthorsdottir V, Sigurdsson G, Thorsson AV, Carroll PV, Korbonits M, Benediktsson R (2015) The epidemiology of pituitary adenomas in Iceland, 1955-2012: a nationwide population-based study. Eur J Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-15-0189
Fernandez A, Karavitaki N, Wass JAH (2010) Prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a community-based, cross-sectional study in Banbury (Oxfordshire, UK). Clin Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03667.x
Richard N (1999) Clayton. Sporadic pituitary tumours: from epidemiology to use of databases. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 13(3):451–460
Daly AF, Rixhon M, Adam C, Dempegioti A, Tichomirowa MA, Beckers A (2006) High prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a cross-sectional study in the province of Liège. Belgium J Clin Endocrinol Metab doi. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-1668
Heshmat MY, Kovi J, Simpson C, Kennedy J, Fan KJ (1976) Neoplasms of the central nervous system. Incidence and population selectivity in the Washington DC, metropolitan area. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197611)38:5<2135::AID-CNCR2820380543>3.0.CO;2-T
Gittleman H, Ostrom QT, Farah PD et al (2014) Descriptive epidemiology of pituitary tumors in the United States, 2004-2009: clinical article. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.5.JNS131819
Tjörnstrand A, Gunnarsson K, Evert M, et al. The incidence rate of pituitary adenomas in western Sweden for the period 2001-2011. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;171(4):519–526
Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Hoffman AR, Kleinberg DL, Montori VM, Schlechte JA, Wass JAH (2011) Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-1692
Nieman LK, Biller BMK, Findling JW, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Stewart PM, Montori VM (2008) The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-0125
Katznelson L, Laws ER, Melmed S, Molitch ME, Murad MH, Utz A, Wass JAH (2014) Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-2700
Ntali G, Capatina C, Grossman A, Karavitaki N (2014) Functioning gonadotroph adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-2362
Beck-Peccoz P, Persani L, Mannavola D, Campi I (2009) TSH-secreting adenomas. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2009.05.006
Penn DL, Burke WT, Laws ER (2018) Management of non-functioning pituitary adenomas: surgery. Pituitary. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-017-0854-2
Lithgow K, Batra R, Matthews T (2019) Karavitaki N. Management of endocrine disease: visual morbidity in patients with pituitary adenoma. Eur J Endocrinol 181(5):R185–R197. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-19-0349
Vié AL, Raverot G (2019) Modern neuro-ophthalmological evaluation of patients with pituitary disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2019.05.003
Thomas R, Shenoy K, Seshadri MS, Muliyil J, Rao A, Paul P (2002) Visual field defects in non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Indian J Ophthalmol 50(2):127–130
Rizzoli P, Iuliano S, Weizenbaum E, Laws E (2016) Headache in patients with pituitary lesions: a longitudinal cohort study. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001067
Arafah BM, Prunty D, Ybarra J, Hlavin ML, Selman WR (2000) The dominant role of increased intrasellar pressure in the pathogenesis of hypopituitarism, hyperprolactinemia, and headaches in patients with pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.85.5.1789
Levy MJ (2011) The association of pituitary tumors and headache. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-010-0166-7
Turcu AF, Erickson BJ, Lin E, Guadalix S, Schwartz K, Scheithauer BW, Atkinson JLD, Young WF (2013) Pituitary stalk lesions: the mayo clinic experience. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-4171
Iglesias P, Rodríguez Berrocal V, Díez JJ (2018) Giant pituitary adenoma: histological types, clinical features and therapeutic approaches. Endocrine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-018-1645-x
Chentli F, Akkache L, Daffeur K, Azzoug S (2014) General seizures revealing macro-adenomas secreting prolactin or prolactin and growth hormone in men. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.131185
Brisman MH, Fetell MR, Post KD (1993) Reversible dementia due to macroprolactinoma. Case Rep J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1993.79.1.0135
Freda PU, Beckers AM, Katznelson L, Molitch ME, Montori VM, Post KD, Lee Vance M (2011) Pituitary incidentaloma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-1048
Molitch ME (2009) Pituitary tumours: pituitary incidentalomas. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2009.05.001
Bills DC, Meyer FB, Laws ER, Davis DH, Ebersold MJ, Scheithauer BW, Ilstrup DM, Abboud CF (1993) A retrospective analysis of pituitary apoplexy. Neurosurgery 33(4):602–608
Randeva HS, Schoebel J, Byrne J, Esiri M, Adams CBT, Wass JAH (1999) Classical pituitary apoplexy: clinical features, management and outcome. Clin Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00754.x
Möller-Goede DL, Brändle M, Landau K, Bernays RL, Schmid C (2011) Pituitary apoplexy: re-evaluation of risk factors for bleeding into pituitary adenomas and impact on outcome. Eur J Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-10-0651
Barkhoudarian G, Kelly DF (2019) Pituitary apoplexy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 30(4):457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2019.06.001
Glezer A, Bronstein MD (2015) Pituitary apoplexy: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Arch Endocrinol Metab 59(3):259–264. https://doi.org/10.1590/2359-3997000000047
Hannon AM, O’Shea T, Thompson CA, Hannon MJ, Dineen R, Khattak A et al (2019) Pregnancy in acromegaly is safe and is associated with improvements in IGF-1 concentrations. Eur J Endocrinol 180(4):K21–K29. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-18-0688
Brue T, Amodru V, Castinetti F (2018) Management of Cushing’s syndrome during pregnancy: solved and unsolved questions. Eur J Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-1058
Hannah-Shmouni F, Stratakis CA (2018) An update on the genetics of benign pituitary adenomas in children and adolescents. Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coemr.2018.04.002
Fideleff HL, Boquete HR, Sequera A, Suárez M, Sobrado P, Giaccio A (2000) Peripubertal prolactinomas: clinical presentation and long-term outcome with different therapeutic approaches. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPEM.2000.13.3.261
Stratakis CA (2018) An update on Cushing syndrome in pediatrics. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ando.2018.03.010
Joshi SM, Hewitt RJD, Storr HL, Rezajooi K, Ellamushi H, Grossman AB, Savage MO, Afshar F (2005) Cushing’s disease in children and adolescents: 20 years of experience in a single neurosurgical center. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000166580.94215.53
Abe T, Tara LA, Ludecke DK (1999) Growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence: features and results of transnasal surgery. Neurosurgery 45(1):1–10
Webb C, Prayson RA (2008) Pediatric pituitary adenomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132(1):77–80. https://doi.org/10.1043/1543-2165(2008)132[77:PPA]2.0.CO;2
Benbow SJ, Foy P, Jones B, Shaw D, MacFarlane IA (1997) Pituitary tumours presenting in the elderly: management and outcome. Clin Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.1997.1180933.x
Yang BT, Chong VFH, Wang ZC, Xian JF, Chen QH (2010) Sphenoid sinus ectopic pituitary adenomas: CT and MRI findings. Br J Radiol 83(987):218–224. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/76663418
Hou L, Harshbarger T, Herrick MK, Tse V, Ciric IS, Maartens NF, Laws ER, Marino R (2002) Suprasellar adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting ectopic pituitary adenoma: case report and literature review. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200203000-00035
Thompson LDR, Seethala RR, Müller S (2012) Ectopic sphenoid sinus pituitary adenoma (ESSPA) with normal anterior pituitary gland: a clinicopathologic and Immunophenotypic study of 32 cases with a comprehensive review of the English literature. Head Neck Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-012-0336-9
Raappana A, Koivukangas J, Ebeling T, Pirilä T (2010) Incidence of pituitary adenomas in Northern Finland in 1992-2007. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-0537
Park SH, Jang JH, Lee YM, Kim JS, Kim KH, Kim YZ (2017) Function of cell-cycle regulators in predicting silent pituitary adenoma progression following surgical resection. Oncol Lett. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7117
Saeger W, Ludecke DK, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Quabbe HJ, Petersenn S (2007) Pathohistological classification of pituitary tumors: 10 years of experience with the German Pituitary Tumor Registry. Eur J Endocrinol 156(2):203–216
Ferrante E, Ferraroni M, Castrignanò T et al (2006) Non-functioning pituitary adenoma database: a useful resource to improve the clinical management of pituitary tumors. Eur J Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.1.02298
Baldeweg SE, Pollock JR, Powell M, Ahlquist J (2005) A spectrum of behaviour in silent corticotroph pituitary adenomas. Br J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688690500081230
Scheithauer BW, Jaap AJ, Horvath E, Kovacs K, Lloyd RV, Meyer FB, Laws ER, Young WF (2000) Clinically silent corticotroph tumors of the pituitary gland. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-200009000-00039
Langlois F, Woltjer R, Cetas JS, Fleseriu M (2018) Silent somatotroph pituitary adenomas: an update. Pituitary. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-017-0858-y
Kim JS, Lee YS, Jung MJ, Hong YK (2016) The predictive value of pathologic features in pituitary adenoma and correlation with pituitary adenoma recurrence. J Pathol Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2016.06.30
Pernicone PJ, Scheithauer BW, Sebo TJ, Kovacs KT, Horvath E, Young WF, Lloyd RV, Davis DH, Guthrie BL, Schoene WC (1997) Pituitary carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 15 cases. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970215)79:4<804::AID-CNCR18>3.0.CO;2-3
McCormack A, Dekkers OM, Petersenn S et al (2018) Treatment of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas: results of a European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) survey 2016. Eur J Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-0933
Lenders N, McCormack A (2018) Malignant transformation in non-functioning pituitary adenomas (pituitary carcinoma). Pituitary. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-017-0857-z
Yang Z, Zhang T, Gao H (2016) Genetic aspects of pituitary carcinoma: a systematic review. Med (United States). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005268
Dworakowska D, Grossman AB (2018) Aggressive and malignant pituitary tumours: state-of-the-art. Endocr Relat Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-18-0228
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Araujo-Castro, M., Berrocal, V.R. & Pascual-Corrales, E. Pituitary tumors: epidemiology and clinical presentation spectrum. Hormones 19, 145–155 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-019-00168-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-019-00168-8