Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical simulation and interpretation of the grain size effect on rock strength

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the grain size effect on rock’s physical–mechanical properties has been widely studied, little attention has been paid to the reasons for this phenomenon. In this paper, an attempt is made to interpret the effect of grain size on uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) from the point of view of mechanics. Based on the microscopic images of rock with different mineral grain size, actual mineral types and grain sizes were identified and characterized using digital image processing techniques and microstructure analysis. By mapping this real rock microstructure into a well-established rock failure process analysis code, numerical specimens were built to model the grain size effect on the UCS. The results showed that considering only mineral type and grain size, the numerical method can reveal the grain size effect on UCS. Further, an ideal conceptual model is proposed to clearly interpret and discuss the grain size effect on strength. It was found that grain size results in different stress concentrations within rock. Under identical loading conditions, the bigger the grain size is, the stronger the stress concentration is. This different mechanical response can eventually affects the UCS of the rock, resulting in the grain size effect on rock strength. Moreover, fractal geometry is also introduced to quantify rock microstructure with different grain sizes. The results show that there exists a good relationship between the fractal dimension and the grain size, which can describe the grain size effect on rock strength both quantitatively and effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Babadagli T, Develi K (2003) Fractal characteristics of rocks fractured under tension. Theor Appl Fract Mech 39(1):73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagde MN, Raina AK, Chakraborty AK, Jethwa JL (2002) Rock mass characterization by fractal dimension. Eng Geol 63(1–2):141–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billi A, Storti F (2004) Fractal distribution of particle size in carbonate cataclastic rocks from the core of a regional strike-slip fault zone. Tectonophysics 384(1–4):115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brace WF (1961) Dependence of fracture strength of rocks on grain size. In: Proceedings of the 4th symposium rock mechanics. University Park, USA, March 1961, pp 99–103

  • de Castro Lima JJ, Paraguassú A (2004) Linear thermal expansion of granitic rocks: influence of apparent porosity, grain size and quartz content. Bull Eng Geol Environ 63(3):215–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt E, Stimpson B, Stead D (1999) Effects of grain size on the initiation and propagation thresholds of stress-induced brittle fractures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 32(2):81–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrich JT, Evans B, Wong TF (1991) Effect of grain size on brittle and semibrittle strength: implications for micromechanical modelling of failure in compression : Fredrich, J T; Evans, B; Wong, T F J Geophys ResV95, NB7, July 1990, P10907–10920. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 28(2–3):A136

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge K, Liu Q (2014) Effects of the grain size distribution on magnetic properties of magnetite: constraints from micromagnetic modeling. Chin Sci Bull 59(34):4763–4773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerik A, Kruhl JH (2009) Towards automated pattern quantification: time-efficient assessment of anisotropy of 2D patterns with AMOCADO. Comput Geosci 35(6):1087–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith AA (1920) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 221(587):163–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzor YH, Palchik V (1997) The influence of grain size and porosity on crack initiation stress and critical flaw length in dolomites. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(5):805–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzor YH, Zur A, Mimran Y (1997) Microstructure effects on microcracking and brittle failure of dolomites. Tectonophysics 281(3–4):141–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbronner R, Bruhn D (1998) The influence of three-dimensional grain size distributions on the rheology of polyphase rocks. J Struct Geol 20(6):695–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugman RHH, Friedman M (1979) Effects of texture and composition on mechanical behavior of experimentally deformed carbonate rocks. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 63(9):1478–1489

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeya KK, Legge TFH (1997) Relationship between grain size and some surface roughness parameters of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(3–4):146.e115–146.e141

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruhl JH (2013) Fractal-geometry techniques in the quantification of complex rock structures: a special view on scaling regimes, inhomogeneity and anisotropy. J Struct Geol 46:2–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusunose K, Lei X, Nishizawa O, Satoh T (1991) Effect of grain size on fractal structure of acoustic emission hypocenter distribution in granitic rock. Phys Earth Planet Inter 67(1–2):194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Huang R (2015) Relationship between joint roughness coefficient and fractal dimension of rock fracture surfaces. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 75:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HY, Roquete M, Kou SQ, Lindqvist PA (2004) Characterization of rock heterogeneity and numerical verification. Eng Geol 72(1–2):89–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson WA (1974) Grain size dependence of yield stress in marble. J Geophys Res 79(32):4859–4862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peternell M, Kruhl JH (2009) Automation of pattern recognition and fractal-geometry-based pattern quantification, exemplified by mineral-phase distribution patterns in igneous rocks. Comput Geosci 35:1415–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Přikryl R (2001) Some microstructural aspects of strength variation in rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38(5):671–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Palencia E (1980) Non-homogeneous media and vibration theory. Springer, Paris, pp 45–128

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar N, Chaudhuri BB (1994) An efficient differential box-counting approach to compute fractal dimension of image. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 24:115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo YS, Jeong GC, Kim JS, Ichikawa Y (2002) Microscopic observation and contact stress analysis of granite under compression. Eng Geol 63(3–4):259–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao S, Wasantha PLP, Ranjith PG, Chen BK (2014) Effect of cooling rate on the mechanical behavior of heated Strathbogie granite with different grain sizes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:381–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK (1988) Relationship among fatigue strength, mean grain size and compressive strength of a rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng 21(4):271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suorineni FT, Chinnasane DR, Kaiser PK (2009) A procedure for determining rock-type specific Hoek–Brown brittle parameters. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42(6):849–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang CA (1997) Numerical simulation of progressive rock failure and associated seismicity. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(2):249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavallali A, Vervoort A (2010) Failure of layered sandstone under Brazilian test conditions: effect of micro-scale parameters on macro-scale behaviour. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(5):641–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong RHC, Chau KT, Wang P (1996) Microcracking and grain size effect in Yuen Long marbles. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33(5):479–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie HP, Liu JF, Ju Y, Li J, Xie LZ (2011) Fractal property of spatial distribution of acoustic emissions during the failure process of bedded rock salt. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(8):1344–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz Gunes N, Karaca Z, Goktan RM, Akal C (2009) Relative brittleness characterization of some selected granitic building stones: influence of mineral grain size. Constr Build Mater 23(1):370–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Q, Zhu W, Tang C, Yang T (2014) Impact of rock microstructures on failure processes—numerical study based on DIP technique. Geomech Eng 7(4):375–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Dai F, Gao MZ, Xu NW, Zhang CP (2015) Fractal analysis of acoustic emission during uniaxial and triaxial loading of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 79:241–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu WC, Tang CA (2004) Micromechanical model for simulating the fracture process of rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng 37(1):25–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present work is partially funded by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51574060 and 51525402). This support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinglei Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, Q., Zhu, W., Ranjith, P.G. et al. Numerical simulation and interpretation of the grain size effect on rock strength. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ. Geo-resour. 4, 157–173 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-018-0080-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-018-0080-z

Keywords

Navigation