Abstract
Sustainable manufacturing has become of great importance in various fields include manufacturing, mechanical engineering, materials science, environmental science, and energy science. In this paper, we analyzed and reviewed the research trends of sustainable manufacturing technologies and suggested future perspective. Specifically, the state-of-the-art and historical trajectory of sustainable manufacturing are analyzed using data obtained from the Web of Science library and the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). Selected journals and research categories are evaluated by the number of publications, the number of citations, impact factor (IF), and H-indices. To suggest future perspectives on sustainable manufacturing research, growth rate of each research objects are evaluated and historically followed. Sustainable manufacturing is likely to be change in its nature in the era of digital transformation. It is expected to provide the status and future of research trends of sustainable manufacturing to the both manufacturing researchers and journal publishers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
A growing number of researchers are focusing “sustainability” as an important objective in the field of manufacturing and engineering [1,2,3,4,5]. This trend has reached well beyond the small niche of those who traditionally focused on “green”, and now resulted many prominent researches. Hence, sustainable manufacturing has become not only environmentally or eco-friendly manufacturing but also considers socially responsible manner in a broad sense [6]. Today, topics and keywords of sustainable manufacturing have expanded includes environmental impact, personnel health, operational safety, waste management, energy consumption, and manufacturing cost.
In definition, sustainable manufacturing is the creation of manufactured products through economical processes that minimize negative environmental impacts while conserving energy and resources [7]. 21st century manufacturing under the condition of environmental shift and deficiency of energy and resources accelerates the growth of sustainable manufacturing [8]. Following the trends to sustainable manufacturing, researchers make efforts to develop technologies for new paradigm of manufacturing [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
Academia is one of the areas where the interest in sustainable manufacturing is growing explosively. Figure 1 shows the increasing number of journal publications which is the most significant indicator in academia in the field of sustainable manufacturing by time from 2008 to 2017. Totally, 341 journal papers in 2008 increased more than 5 times and reached to 1722 journal papers in 2017. Moreover, there was not even a single year of decline in journal paper publications from 2008 to 2017. In view of explosive growth of journal papers to date, interest in sustainable manufacturing in academia is likely to continue to increase.
One of the major reasons for high growth rate of interest in sustainable manufacturing is legislation initiatives as previous work [22,23,24,25]. United Nations (UN)’s sustainable development agenda called the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [26], and Paris Agreement of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) from 21st session of the Conference of the Parties to United Nations Convention (COP21) are representative example of legislation [27]. They have commons into oppose environmentally destroyable methods of manufacturing, encourage participation of both parties and non-parties include developing countries, and suggest specific action plan.
However, several legislative actions are not only reason for efforts toward sustainable manufacturing [7, 28]. Economically speaking, high growth rate of interest in sustainable manufacturing is a natural result. The incremental increase of productivity is not able to follow the rapidly improving standard of quality of living in developing countries. Furthermore, digital transformation reinforces the importance of how to supply raw materials and energy to manufacture and operate largely increased demands on products and energy which intensify the importance of sustainable manufacturing. Therefore, sustainable manufacturing is now as an irreversible global trend in the field of manufacturing and engineering. According to United States Environmental Protection Agency, growing number of companies are treating sustainability as an importance objective in their strategy and operations to increase growth and global competitiveness [29]. It also defined 5 reasons why companies are pursuing sustainability.
-
Increase operational efficiency by reducing costs and waste.
-
Reach new customers and increase competitive advantage.
-
Strengthen brand and reputation and build public trust.
-
Build long-term business viability and success.
-
Respond to regulatory constraints and opportunities.
Likewise, the industry is seeing a proliferation of sustainable manufacturing, which is due to a much more diverse and complex reason than existing reasons. Companies move forward along the path to sustainability by improving performance and reducing their resource.
This review concludes with an evaluation of research trends in sustainable manufacturing area based on research databases. We investigate historical trajectory and state-of-the-art sustainable manufacturing technologies published in recent 5 years [30]. Research databases obtained from the Web of Science library [31] and the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) [32] were used for analysis. H-index, impact factor (IF), number of citation, and number of published articles were used as evaluation method for importance of each subject. Finally, it is expected that the review will contribute to discussions on the future perspective of sustainable manufacturing technologies.
2 Analysis of Sustainable Manufacturing Research Trends
Research papers and articles in the area of sustainable manufacturing and its applications were analyzed. As publishing trends can provide milestones for future perspectives in terms of academic researchers, various factors of the publications were reviewed include nations, journals, articles, and keyword with individual journals also being reviewed. Data from 2010 to 2017 was analyzed for longitudinal study of research trends of sustainable manufacturing by time series.
There are several indicators for evaluation of academic results, the number of published articles, number of citations, IF and the H-index were used as evaluation parameters in this work similar to that of a previous work [23]. In general, the number of published articles was assumed to correlate with the importance of the journal and research subject, and the numbers of citations was assumed to correlate with the attention received from other researches.
IF is a measure reflecting the yearly average number of citations to recent articles published in that journal. Herein, IF was used as an important indicator for evaluation of performance of journal. Lastly, H-index is used for evaluation of categories in sustainable manufacturing. It is also a widely used indicator to evaluate individual scholars or research category to evaluate both productivity and the impact of a body of work.
Figure 2 and Fig. 3 show the 10 countries that have published the most journal articles related to sustainable manufacturing in 2013 and 2017 respectively. Hence, they represent global trend at that time but also historical trajectory of sustainable manufacturing. The most journal publications were from the United States and China, followed by the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, etc., in 2013. However, China exceeds the United States in the number of journal publications and took first place in 2017. It is a remarkable achievement of China considering the difference of more than double in 2013. In addition, the prominence of Asian countries was also remarkable. Specifically, India, ranked ninth in 2013, ranked fifth in 2017 and Malaysia, which was out of the ranking in 2013, ranked tenth.
Table 1 shows top 6 journals in the field of sustainable manufacturing. At first, we selected all journals in ‘Green & Sustainable Science & Technology’ journal category. However, these journals also covered the topic which is not directly related to sustainable manufacturing include ‘Chemistry, Multidisciplinary’, and ‘Argonomy’. Hence, we excluded above categories and limited them in the ‘Energy & Fuels’, ‘Engineering, Environmental’ and ‘Engineering, Manufacturing’, which are representative categories of journal related to sustainable manufacturing. Top ranked journal was “Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews” with IF of 9.184 in 2017. “International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology” ranked sixth with IF of 3.774 in 2017.
As Table 1 indicated only the current status of various research journals, historical changes in selected research journals are discussed in Figs. 4 and 5. As interest of sustainable manufacturing increases, most of journals except few show continuous increase in both of citation number and IF. Specifically, “IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy” shows highest growth rate of citation numbers, while “Renewable & Sustainble Energy Reviews” shows the highest growth rate of IF. It also ranked first in the citation numbers like in terms of IF. “International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology” also shows high growth rate in both citation numbers and impact factor.
Table 2 shows 10 most-cited articles in 2013–2014. We found articles that had keyword with ‘sustain manufacturing’ or ‘green manufacturing’ and refined them in category of engineering and manufacturing. Most of the articles were reviews. Articles form Samuel H. Huang et al., in 2013, “Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: A literature review” has the highest citation members of 238. International journal of production economics published 4 top cited papers in top 10 cited articles.
Four of top 10 cited papers have keywords of “additive manufacturing” in title. Also, most of cited papers are focusing on advanced manufacturing technologies including 3D printing which is one kind of additive manufacturing. By this time, researchers focused on advanced manufacturing process technology which can save energy or raw materials to reduce energy and resources consumption. In other words, sustainable manufacturing in 2013–2014 was primarily concerned with hardware innovation.
Table 3 shows 10 most-cited articles in 2016–2017. All the evaluation methods and data obtaining sources were identical from what we had for Table 2. Hence, we can discuss the research trends of sustainable manufacturing in terms of keywords. Big data analytics, supply chain management, and decision making algorithm are newly-emerging keywords for sustainable manufacturing in 2016–2017.
With the advent of Industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing has been also changing [52, 53]. Conventionally, sustainable manufacturing was primarily limited to hardware and manufacturing process, it is now focusing on software innovation. The biggest changes in topic and keyword in sustainable manufacturing are the utilization of data and algorithm in sustainable manufacturing. The representative applications of data and algorithm in sustainable manufacturing are process understanding and optimization of resource usage. First, data measured by several sensors help understanding process itself and total supply chain which includes single process. Moreover, these understanding derive the environmental impact of operations systematically. The result obtained by process understanding is used as a basis for optimization of resource usage. This information previously dispersed across different formats is trying to make out the end-to-end impact of their operations throughout the value chain.
Overall, we showed that the attraction for sustainable manufacturing is increasing. Also, it is verified by increasing numbers of journal publications in sustainable manufacturing. However, the trends of sustainable manufacturing are gradually changing in detail such as most published counties and citation numbers and impact factor of journals. Furthermore, the topics and keywords that are mainly discussed in sustainable manufacturing are also changing.
According to review and analysis of research trends of sustainable manufacturing, we discussed on future perspectives of sustainable manufacturing in next section based on research databases. Moreover, specific technologies were selected and categorized from the perspective of manufacturing engineers.
3 Future Perspectives of Sustainable Manufacturing Research Trends
As discussed in the previous chapters, sustainable manufacturing are getting attention worldwide. The concerns on sustainable manufacturing were also reflected in journal citation report and web of science database. In the web of science, category of ‘Green & Sustainable Science & Technology’ was first created in 2015. In this section, trends related to sustainable manufacturing are analyzed with different categories to discuss the future perspectives. Representative categories of journal related to sustainable manufacturing were selected. They are ‘Energy & Fuels’, ‘Engineering, Mechanical’, ‘Engineering, Environmental’, ‘Engineering, Manufacturing’, ‘Engineering, Industrial’ and ‘Green & Sustainable Science & Technology’. The trajectories of the total citation, number of articles and impact factor of these categories from 2013 to 2017 are analyzed and compared as shown in Fig. 6. Data of the ‘Green & Sustainable Science & Technology’ category is shown only for 3 years. All of the six categories related to sustainable manufacturing shows increase rate in both number of article and total citation. ‘Energy & Fuels’ shows the largest number of articles and total citation which means large number of researches are carried out with attentions.
Furthermore, ‘Energy & Fuels’ and ‘Green & Sustainable Science & Technology’ shows the highest impact factor. It means that energy and fuels are the main approach to solve the manufacturing issue towards green technology. Also, ‘Engineering, Industrial’ and ‘Engineering, Environmental’ shows steepest increase rate. It is expected that the research on the area of industrial engineering and environmental engineering will get more attentions and impacts in near future.
In order to investigate changes of research areas in details, keywords related to sustainable manufacturing were selected. The current data and the previous data were compared. The data between 2010 and 2014 were obtained from the paper by Yoon et al. [23] published in 2016. Data between 2013 and 2017 were collected from the Web of Science on May 2018. Figure 7 shows the trend of the number of published articles and their H index.
Except for ‘Biomaterials’ which shows slight decrease, research area related to sustainable manufacturing shows increase rate in both number of journal articles and H-index. As described in the previous literature [30], they are all in the stage between early stage and developed state. In early stage, research related to the area starts by few researchers with little attention. In the emerging state, the number of researchers in the field increases and it begins to attract more attentions. Most of research area related to sustainable manufacturing seems additional increases will be followed.
Electrical discharge machining (EDM) technologies had been almost completed before 10 years ago [54, 55]. However, the results have not been opened because the main research groups are the major machine companies. Only main concepts of them were applied for patents. Therefore, the general research topics are applications for advanced materials and investigations of the optimal machining conditions. As a results of the current EDM studies, their H-indices have been increased but the number of articles have been decreased.
In Fig. 8, increase rates are compared. It is supposed that the change rate of H index is more important factor than that of total number of published paper to analyze the influence on the society. Additive manufacturing, electrochromic devices, minimum quantity lubrication (MQL), electric vehicle and EDM are the most influential research areas in sustainable manufacturing.
In the cutting process, most of lubricants have been carbide-based oil or water soluble chemicals [56,57,58]. The reasons why MQL stands out as an eco-friendly process are not only their low consumption of lubricants, but also usage of plant or ethanol-based liquid [59,60,61]. Following the research trends, we expected that of research trends of MQL and EDM are likely to show a similar pattern. Instead of development of advanced manufacturing process for MQL, applications to various materials using MQL are expected to occupy the majority.
Most important research area, which shows highest H-index change rate and increase rate of number of articles is additive manufacturing. Additive manufacturing gets a lot of attention in the recent 5 years to minimize the waste by using bottom up method [62,63,64]. Compared to top down methods where generation of waste is inevitable by cutting out the base material to get the desired features, bottom up methods could avoid the waste generation by print the materials as the desired feature shape [65,66,67]. As discussed in Sect. 2, even though the trend is leaning toward from hardware to software innovation recently, additive manufacturing is still in the developing stage and expected to grow in the next several years.
Furthermore, electrochromic devices shows high increase rates. Electrochromic devices such as electrochromic windows on the building utilize the solar energy to reduce the energy loss [68,69,70,71]. Instead of fossil fuels, renewable energy such as photovoltaic, thermoelectric, wind turbine, etc. are widely studied and considered as a future energy sources without environmentally negative impact. The portion of renewable energy in manufacturing has increased and expected to increase more in the future.
Electric vehicles are also the keyword with both high H-index change rate and number of articles. The development of zero-emission vehicles has actively researched by academia and industry since the depletion of the fossil resources and the climatic change cause by carbon emissions are considered as urgent issues [72,73,74]. Hence, there are several efforts to reduce fuel consumption and emissions by the electrification of the automobile and the displacement of gasoline by alternative energy carriers. Consumer’s interest in the environment, the efforts by car manufacturers, and government support will continue to develop the research of electric vehicles [75, 76].
Moreover, keywords of EDM and MQL shows high H-index increase rate. In the conventional manufacturing process, there are efforts to transform conventional machining to sustainable manufacturing process by reducing the energy and waste. For example, EDM increases the efficiency of the machining process and minimizes use of energy [77]. Also, MQL is studied to reduce the waste [78].
Based on research databases in the field of sustainable manufacturing, we identified three commonalities. First, sustainable manufacturing has been defined relatively accurately by focusing on several specific applications away from unclear and abstract concepts. This aspect is likely to continue by addressing sustainability in a coordinated and formal manner, rather than in an ad hoc and informal manner. Next, sustainable manufacturing is no longer a cost-saving measure but an essential tool for developing new core competencies. It is now producing environmentally friendly results through innovative processes, rather than the eco-friendly changes of existing processes. Finally, sustainable manufacturing requires a collaborative work with various researchers from a long term perspective. Recent research on sustainable manufacturing has largely been made up of a combination of multi-disciplines, and this aspect is likely to continue in the future.
4 Conclusions
In this review, researches pertaining to sustainable manufacturing were analyzed based on articles contained in research databases. Status quo and historical trajectory of sustainable manufacturing in recent was evaluated using the data obtained from the Web of Science library and JCR. To inform the discussion on future perspectives sustainable manufacturing, research journals and subject areas were evaluated using various methods include number of published articles, number of citations, IF and H-indices.
Researches on sustainable manufacturing in Asian countries have increased rapidly and begin to exceed conventionally countries with a well-established research infrastructure. In terms of journals, journal which had previously shown high impact factor and citation numbers, continued to dominate. Also, journal categories of sustainable manufacturing are showing an increasing trend while maintaining their rankings as a rule.
According to analysis, the research trends in sustainable manufacturing also follows the general trend in Industry 4.0. It seems that big data and their processing capabilities like decision making algorithm and deep learning will play an important role in the era of digital transformation also in the field of sustainable manufacturing. However, conventionally spotlighted topics include additive manufacturing and electrochromic devices likely to continue to strengthen.
Researches in the field of energy and fuels are the main approach to solve the limitation of manufacturing process and find the solution towards sustainable manufacturing process. Researchers are seeking ways for the environmentally friendly manufacturing process by using renewable energy or energy efficient and minimum waste generation processes. To this end, increasing number of research and attention are in the research area of additive manufacturing, electrochromic devices, electrical vehicle, MQL, etc.
This review provided insights into the current status of sustainable manufacturing, by suggesting evaluation methods and providing specific examples, and should also inform future perspectives. For the future, better evaluation methods include keyword analysis using artificial intelligence can provide a higher degree of understanding of the current status and future perspectives of the scientific research in the field of sustainable manufacturing researchers.
Beyond struggling with short-term survival, manufacturing should change their natures with environmental improvement and economically sustainable. To take important steps towards green growth which ensures future-oriented manufacturing, pioneering research manufacturing researchers is required.
References
Garetti, M., & Taisch, M. (2011). Sustainable manufacturing: trends and research challenges. Production Planning & Control, 23(2–3), 83–104.
Ahn, S.-H. (2012). Preface for a special issue on green manufacturing and applications. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13(7), 1027.
Jayal, A. D., et al. (2010). Sustainable manufacturing: Modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2(3), 144–152.
Dornfeld, D. A. (2014). Moving towards green and sustainable manufacturing. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 1(1), 63–66.
Herrmann, C., et al. (2014). Sustainability in manufacturing and factories of the future. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 1(4), 283–292.
Joung, C. B., et al. (2013). Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecological Indicators, 24, 148–157.
Jovane, F., Westkämper, E., & David, W. (2008). The ManuFuture road: Towards competitive and sustainable high-adding-value manufacturing. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
Ahn, S.-H., Chun, D.-M., & Chu, W.-S. (2013). Perspective to green manufacturing and applications. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 14(6), 873–874.
Haapala, K. R., Zhao, F., Camelio, J., Sutherland, J. W., Skerlos, S. J., Dornfeld, D. A., et al. (2013). A review of engineering research in sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 135(4), 041013.
Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016). Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 40, 536–541.
Despeisse, M., et al. (2011). The emergence of sustainable manufacturing practices. Production Planning & Control, 23(5), 354–376.
Heilala, J., et al., Simulation-based sustainable manufacturing system design. In: Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Winter Simulation, 2008: p. 1922–1930.
Ijomah, W. L., et al. (2007). Development of design for remanufacturing guidelines to support sustainable manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 23(6), 712–719.
Rosen, M. A., & Kishawy, H. A. (2012). Sustainable manufacturing and design: Concepts. Practices and Needs. Sustainability, 4(2), 154–174.
Standridge, C. R., Miller, G., & Pawloski, J. (2010). A case study of lean, sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 3(1), 11–32.
Smith, L., & Ball, P. (2012). Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modelling material, energy and waste flows. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 227–238.
Westkämper, E. (2000). Alting, and arndt, life cycle management and assessment: Approaches and visions towards sustainable manufacturing (keynote paper). CIRP Annals, 49(2), 501–526.
Bourhis, F. L., et al. (2013). Sustainable manufacturing: evaluation and modeling of environmental impacts in additive manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 69(9–12), 1927–1939.
Chiu, M.-C., & Chu, C.-H. (2012). Review of sustainable product design from life cycle perspectives. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13(7), 1259–1272.
Shan, Z., et al. (2012). Key manufacturing technology & equipment for energy saving and emissions reduction in mechanical equipment industry. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13(7), 1095–1100.
Linke, B., Huang, Y.-C., & Dornfeld, D. (2012). Establishing greener products and manufacturing processes. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13(7), 1029–1036.
Jovane, F., et al. (2008). The incoming global technological and industrial revolution towards competitive sustainable manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 57(2), 641–659.
Yoon, H.-S., et al. (2016). Future perspectives of sustainable manufacturing and applications based on research databases. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 17(9), 1249–1263.
Feng, S.C., C.B. Joung, G. Li, Development overview of sustainable manufacturing metrics. In: Proceedings of the 17th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering, p. 6. 2010.
Park, C. W., et al. (2009). Energy consumption reduction technology in manufacturing—a selective review of policies, standards, and research. International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing, 10(5), 151–173.
United Nations, Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. (2018). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld. Accessed 6 Dec 2018.
United Nations Conference on Climate Change, What was COP21? (2018). http://www.cop21paris.org/about/cop21. Accessed 6 Dec 2018.
Jayaraman, V., Singh, R., & Anandnarayan, A. (2012). Impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on consumer perception and revenue growth: an emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), 1395–1410.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Sustainable Manufacturing. (2019). http://www.epa.gov/sustainability/sustainable-manufacturing. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.
Ahn, S.-H. (2014). An evaluation of green manufacturing technologies based on research databases. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 1(1), 5–9.
Clarivate Analytics, Web of Science. (2018). http://mjl.clarivate.com. Accessed 6 Dec 2018.
Clarivate Analytics, Journal Citation Reports. (2018). https://clarivate.com/products/journal-citation-reports. Accessed 6 Dec 2018.
Huang, S. H., et al. (2012). Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67(5–8), 1191–1203.
Govindan, K., et al. (2014). Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 555–568.
ElMaraghy, H., et al. (2013). Product variety management. CIRP Annals, 62(2), 629–652.
Mellor, S., Hao, L., & Zhang, D. (2014). Additive manufacturing: A framework for implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 149, 194–201.
Luo, H., et al. (2013). Hybrid flow shop scheduling considering machine electricity consumption cost. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(2), 423–439.
Strano, G., et al. (2012). A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66(9–12), 1247–1254.
Bhattacharya, A., et al. (2013). Green supply chain performance measurement using fuzzy ANP-based balanced scorecard: a collaborative decision-making approach. Production Planning & Control, 25(8), 698–714.
Schrettle, S., et al. (2014). Turning sustainability into action: Explaining firms’ sustainability efforts and their impact on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 73–84.
Yoon, H.-S., et al. (2015). A comparison of energy consumption in bulk forming, subtractive, and additive processes: Review and case study. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 1(3), 261–279.
Wang, G., et al. (2016). Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 176, 98–110.
Esmaeilian, B., Behdad, S., & Wang, B. (2016). The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 39, 79–100.
Dubey, R., et al. (2015). The impact of big data on world-class sustainable manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 84(1–4), 631–645.
Büyüközkan, G., & Güleryüz, S. (2016). An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 435–448.
Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., & Watson, G. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 350–366.
Ahn, D.-G. (2016). Direct metal additive manufacturing processes and their sustainable applications for green technology: A review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 3(4), 381–395.
Tao, F., et al. (2016). A hybrid group leader algorithm for green material selection with energy consideration in product design. CIRP Annals, 65(1), 9–12.
Bazan, E., Jaber, M. Y., & Zanoni, S. (2017). Carbon emissions and energy effects on a two-level manufacturer-retailer closed-loop supply chain model with remanufacturing subject to different coordination mechanisms. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 394–408.
Geng, R., Mansouri, S. A., & Aktas, E. (2017). The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: A meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 245–258.
Govindan, K., Jha, P. C., & Garg, K. (2015). Product recovery optimization in closed-loop supply chain to improve sustainability in manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 1463–1486.
de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., et al. (2018). When titans meet—can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 18–25.
Kang, H. S., et al. (2016). Smart manufacturing: Past research, present findings, and future directions. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 3(1), 111–128.
Ho, K. H., & Newman, S. T. (2003). State of the art electrical discharge machining (EDM). International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 43(13), 1287–1300.
MohdAbbas, N., Solomon, D. G., & Fuad Bahari, M. (2007). A review on current research trends in electrical discharge machining (EDM). International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 47(7–8), 1214–1228.
Silva, L.R., Corrêa, E.C., Brandão, J.R., & de Ávila, R.F. (2013) Environmentally friendly manufacturing: Behavior analysis of minimum quantity of lubricant-MQL in grinding process. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.033.
Somashekaraiah, R., et al. (2016). Eco-Friendly, non-toxic cutting fluid for sustainable manufacturing and machining processes. Tribology Online, 11(5), 556–567.
Hörner, D. (2002). Recent trends in environmentally friendly lubricants. Journal of Synthetic Lubrication, 18(4), 327–347.
Nagendramma, P., & Kaul, S. (2012). Development of ecofriendly/biodegradable lubricants: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 764–774.
Lee, P.H., Nam, T.S., Li, C., & Lee, S.W. (2010). Environmentally-friendly nano-fluid minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) meso-scale grinding process using nano-diamond particles. In: 2010 International Conference on Manufacturing Automation (pp. 44-49). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMA.2010.27
Alam, M., et al. (2014). Vegetable oil based eco-friendly coating materials: A review article. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 7(4), 469–479.
Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., & Stucker, B. (2014). Additive manufacturing technologies. Berlin: Springer.
Gardan, J. (2015). Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends. International Journal of Production Research, 54(10), 3118–3132.
Vaezi, M., Seitz, H., & Yang, S. (2012). A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67(5–8), 1721–1754.
Frazier, W. E. (2014). Metal additive manufacturing: A review. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 23(6), 1917–1928.
Faludi, J., et al. (2015). Comparing environmental impacts of additive manufacturing vs traditional machining via life-cycle assessment. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21(1), 14–33.
Lee, H., Lim, C. H. J., Low, M. J., et al. (2017). Lasers in additive manufacturing: A review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 4(3), 307–322.
Lampert, C. M. (1984). Electrochromic materials and devices for energy efficient windows. Solar Energy Materials, 11(1–2), 1–27.
Azens, A., & Granqvist, C. (2003). Electrochromic smart windows: energy efficiency and device aspects. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 7(2), 64–68.
Monk, P., Mortimer, R., & Rosseinsky, D. (2007). Electrochromism and electrochromic devices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Park, S.-I., et al. (2016). A review on fabrication processes for electrochromic devices. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 3(4), 397–421.
Bradley, T. H., & Frank, A. A. (2009). Design, demonstrations and sustainability impact assessments for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(1), 115–128.
Faria, R., et al. (2012). A sustainability assessment of electric vehicles as a personal mobility system. Energy Conversion and Management, 61, 19–30.
Franke, T., Bühler, F., Cocron, P., Neumann, I., & Krems, J. F. (2012). Enhancing sustainability of electric vehicles: a field study approach to understanding user acceptance and behavior. In M. Sullman & L. Dorn (Eds.), Advances in Traffic Psychology (pp. 295–306). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Canals Casals, L., et al. (2016). Sustainability analysis of the electric vehicle use in Europe for CO2 emissions reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 425–437.
Günther, H. O., Kannegiesser, M., & Autenrieb, N. (2015). The role of electric vehicles for supply chain sustainability in the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, 220–233.
Zia, M. K., Pervaiz, S., Anwar, S., & Samad, W. A. (2019). Reviewing sustainability interpretation of electrical discharge machining process using triple bottom line approach. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00043-2.
Nam, J., & Lee, S. W. (2018). Machinability of titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) in environmentally-friendly micro-drilling process with nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication using nanodiamond particles. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 5(1), 29–35.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Basic Research Lab Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2018R1A4A1059976, NRF-2018R1A2A1A13078704, and NRF-2017K1A3A9A04013801), and supported by Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI) Creative Convergence Research Project (CAP-PBF087) funded by the National Research Council of Science and Technology (NST). This work was supported by the Brain Korea 21 Plus Project in 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, HT., Song, JH., Min, SH. et al. Research Trends in Sustainable Manufacturing: A Review and Future Perspective based on Research Databases. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. 6, 809–819 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00113-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00113-5