Abstract
Purpose
Hypoxia is a condition of insufficient oxygen to support metabolism which occurs when the vascular supply is interrupted, or when a tumour outgrows its vascular supply. It is a negative prognostic factor due to its association with an aggressive tumour phenotype and therapeutic resistance. This review provides an overview of hypoxia imaging with Positron emission tomography (PET), with an emphasis on the biological relevance, mechanism of action, highlighting advantages, and limitations of the currently available hypoxia radiotracers.
Methods
A comprehensive PubMed literature search was performed, identifying articles relating to biological significance and measurement of hypoxia, MRI methods, and PET imaging of hypoxia in preclinical and clinical settings, up to December 2016.
Results
A variety of approaches have been explored over the years for detecting and monitoring changes in tumour hypoxia, including regional measurements with oxygen electrodes placed under CT guidance, MRI methods that measure either oxygenation or lactate production consequent to hypoxia, different nuclear medicine approaches that utilise imaging agents the accumulation of which is inversely related to oxygen tension, and optical methods. The advantages and disadvantages of these approaches are reviewed, along with individual strategies for validating different imaging methods. PET is the preferred method for imaging tumour hypoxia due to its high specificity and sensitivity to probe physiological processes in vivo, as well as the ability to provide information about intracellular oxygenation levels.
Conclusion
Even though hypoxia could have significant prognostic and predictive value in the clinic, the best method for hypoxia assessment has in our opinion not been realised.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
What is hypoxia?
Hypoxia generally refers to sub-physiologic tissue oxygen levels (<5–10 mmHg). Tumour hypoxia, a hallmark of malignancy, is a common and important feature of the tumour microenvironment. It is the consequence of an oxygen delivery versus consumption mismatch that occurs when cell proliferation outstrips neoangiogenesis during tumour growth. This results in very low oxygen levels (<5 mmHg) in tumours versus 40–60 mmHg in healthy tissues [1]. Hypoxia can generally be classified as (1) perfusion-related (acute) hypoxia due to insufficient blood flow, (2) diffusion-related (chronic) hypoxia caused by an increase in diffusion distances with tumour expansion, and (3) anaemic hypoxia caused by a decrease in oxygen transport capacity [2]. The latter two are considered relatively stable, whereas the degree of acute hypoxia may change in a short time. Cancer cells respond differently to decreased oxygen tension by eliciting cell death or cell survival, which partially depends on the time of exposure to hypoxia.
The origin of chronic hypoxia in human tumours was postulated by Thomlinson and Gray in 1955 [3]. Chronic hypoxia, also referred to as diffusion-limited hypoxia (DLH), is caused by consumption of oxygen by cells close to vessels, leaving inadequate oxygen for the cells further away from the vessels (>100 µm of capillary blood vessels), as demonstrated by means of phosphorescence lifetime imaging of R3230AC tumours in dorsal flap window chambers [4]. Chronic hypoxic changes are exacerbated in larger tumours and contribute to long-term cellular changes such as high frequency of DNA breaks, accumulation of DNA replication errors, potentially leading to genetic instability and mutagenesis [5, 6].
Brown and colleagues [7] were the first to present a second form of hypoxia: acute hypoxia. Acute hypoxia is an abrupt and brief exposure to short-term hypoxia (between a few minutes and up to 72 h) which occurs consequent to fluctuations in tumour perfusion accompanying functionally and structurally defective vascular network in tumour (overdilated, hyperpermeable, tortuous, and disrupted), and associated with high-interstitial pressure of the extracellular matrix [8]. This leads to periods of better or worse oxygenation [9, 10] promulgating the lexicon—cycling hypoxia [11]. Temporal occlusion of blood vessels caused by blood clots or tumour emboli can also cause acute hypoxia [12]. Acute hypoxia can lead to generation of high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can damage cells [13]. Cellular adaptations to these conditions have been enumerated and include decreasing oxidative metabolism and activating autophagy [14, 15]. Increased radio-resistance of cancer cells [13, 16], induction of spontaneous metastasis [10, 17, 18], and genomic instability due to delayed DNA damage response and rapid p53-dependent apoptosis [19, 20] can also result from hypoxia, leading to an aggressive tumour phenotype.
Hypoxia represents a unique tumour vulnerability to be exploited in the context of newly emerging personalised medicine strategies. Undoubtedly, both chronic and acute tumour hypoxia directly affect clinical responses to therapy by influencing tumour growth, ability to metastasize, and resistance to cell death.
Methods
A comprehensive PubMed literature search was performed, identifying articles relating to types of hypoxia, biological significance of hypoxia, measurement of hypoxia, MRI methods, and PET imaging of hypoxia in preclinical and clinical settings, up to December 2016. Search terms that were used to identify such articles were “hypoxia imaging,” “MRI,” “FMISO”, “FAZA”, “FETNIM”, “EF5”, “HX4”, “RP-170”, “Cu-ATSM”, and “PET” or “positron emission tomography.” Original publications in English were selected for inclusion in this review.
Biology and clinical significance of hypoxia
Tumour hypoxia is frequently seen in solid tumours, and tumour cells survive by activating different signalling pathways leading to a plethora of temporally or spatially heterogeneous changes in tumours (Table 1), elicited at different thresholds of oxygen tension [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. In fact, during malignant growth, hypoxic regions are associated with increased genetic instability and more aggressive phenotype which correlate with tumour metastasis risk. Likewise, hypoxia causes unequivocal resistance to cancer treatments, such as reduced drug penetration, intrinsic chemoresistance (by mechanisms including loss of sensitivity to p53-mediated apoptosis or diminution of cell proliferation by metabolic stress), and resistance to ionizing radiation (reduced ability of oxygen to fix DNA lesions).
A number of biological consequences of low oxygen levels have been elegantly described by Höckel and Vaupel [53]. At pO2 levels less than 10–15 mmHg, cells become radioresistant and gene expression of hypoxia-regulated genes under control of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF1) increases. Decreased adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis is seen at pO2 levels less than 10 mmHg and together with decreased protein synthesis leads to lower oxygen consumption by cells. Finally, pO2 levels less than 1 mmHg reduce oxidative phosphorylation and conversely enhance glycolysis to maintain adequate ATP levels [54].
Role of HIF1alpha
Pathological hypoxia is a common microenvironment factor in tumours that facilitates cell survival and propagation of the tumour. The cross-talk between tumour and its microenvironment is essential for tumour survival [55]. Hypoxia-inducible changes not only affect tumour cells but also the tumour microenvironment [56]. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and 2 (HIF1 and HIF2, respectively) are oxygen-sensitive, heterodimeric transcription factors that act as key mediators of the cellular adaptation to low oxygen. HIF1 regulates glycolysis and pyruvate metabolism, and HIF-2 controls fatty acid metabolism. HIF1 is a heterodimeric protein consisting of HIF1alpha (oxygen regulated) and HIF1beta (constitutively expressed) dimers. Hypoxia stabilises HIF1alpha which stimulates expression of a variety of genes controlling metabolic pathways, pH regulation, angiogenesis, metastatic potential, DNA replication, protein synthesis, and treatment resistance, which (1) enhances cell survival via growth factor signalling and inhibition of pro-apoptotic pathways, (2) contribute to tumour neovascularization via VEGF, VEGF receptors, COX-2, iNOS, (3) regulate cell detachment via down regulation of adhesion molecules such as cadherins, and (4) induce cell migration and invasion through matrix degrading enzymes [57,57,59] (Table 1, Fig. 1).
Resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy mediated by HIF1 signalling
Drug resistance could potentially occur at the cellular level or secondary to changes in the tumour microenvironment. Tumours have convoluted vasculature which results in proliferating well-nourished cells closer to the functional blood vessels and regions of hypoxic cells located away from the functional blood vessels. Irregular blood flow and large distances between functional blood vessels in solid tumours lead to poor drug distribution, resulting in therapeutic resistance [60].
It is often difficult to discriminate between the effects of hypoxia per se and HIF1, and the literature on the effects of the hypoxic microenvironment and HIF1 on drug efflux and multidrug resistant phenotype [61], for instance, is controversial. Zhao and co-workers recently reported that HIF1alpha suppresses MDR1/P-glycoprotein in gastric cancer by inhibiting miR-27a expression in gastric cancer [62], and in colon cancer cells, inhibition of HIF1 leads to downregulation of p-glycoprotein and reversal of multidrug resistant phenotype [63]. In contrast, pronounced hypoxia has minor effect on p-glycoprotein expression and activity [64], while acidosis, a feature of the hpoxic micro-environement, increases p-glycoprotein activity [65]. In addition, regarding drug efficacy, the hypoxic environment can modify the efficacy of drugs that require molecular oxygen as part of their mechanism of action, e.g., bleomycins [66, 67], or are activated by reductases under hypoxia, e.g., evofosfamide, tarloxotinib, tirapazamine, and SN30000 [68, 69], and is a barrier to drug delivery generally independent of HIF1 [70]. Hypoxia and HIF1 also confer treatment resistance of cancer cells by inducing cell cycle arrest (quiescence) [71], making drugs that target cycling cells ineffective), and by supporting the highly tumourigenic stem cell niche [72]. In glioblastoma, HIF1alpha+ quiescent stem-like are found to locate within the peri-necrotic region and confer higher tumourigenic potential [73]. During severe or prolonged hypoxia, most of the cells undergo programmed cell death. However, some of the tumour cells adjust to environmental stress and survive by avoiding necrosis, inhibition of apoptosis [48, 74, 75], and decreasing senescence of cells [76], mediated by HIFalpha, resulting in an aggressive phenotype and resistance to treatment.
During fractionated radiotherapy, HIF1alpha protects the tumour microvasculature from radiation-induced endothelial apoptosis, via induction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and other pro-angiogenic factors and facilitates tumour cell survival by increasing the antioxidant capacity of tumours to counteract radation-induced oxidative stress [21]. Irradiation also induces changes in the tumour microenvironment such as vascular, stromal, and immunological changes which may promote radioresistance and tumour recurrence [77]. These effects eventually lead to the resistance of tumour cells to chemotherapy and radiation.
Measurement of hypoxia
Knowledge of the hypoxia state enables prediction of treatment outcome and selection of patients for hypoxia modifying treatment. The relative prevalence of diffusion limited hypoxia (DLH), cyclic and perfusional hypoxia in human tumours or animal models is not known, and it is predicted that different hypoxia modes require different diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Several noninvasive techniques (direct or indirect measurements) are available to obtain an absolute or relative value of the oxygenation status of tumours. The various strategies available are described in Table 2 [78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103]. Each of the techniques described interrogates different aspects of the hypoxic microenvironment, and they provide information on hypoxia at different locations: Oxygen electrodes and OxyLite sampling predominantly measure interstitial hypoxia. PET, SPECT, and extrinsic markers report on intracellular hypoxia and PET/SPECT images quantify data on a macroscopic scale in tumour regions. Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD)-MRI and Oxy-R fraction allow assessment of blood oxygenation, while indirect methods that report on hypoxia-induced molecular events (e.g., GLUT1, CA9 expression) rather than hypoxia itself have also been utilised as markers of tumour oxygenation.
MRI methods
These include MR-based gradient-recalled echo techniques, electron paramagnetic resonance, and MR spectroscopy. MRI methods for interrogating tumour oxygenation are attractive since MRI scanners are widely available and they avoid the complication of short-lived radioactivity.
Blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD)-MRI
The most facile contrast mechanism, which depends on blood oxygenation—blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) MRI—avoids the need for reporter molecules by imaging differences between diamagnetic oxy-haemoglobin and paramagnetic deoxy-haemoglobin. The presence of deoxy-haemoglobin in a blood vessel causes susceptibility differences between vessel and its surrounding tissue resulting in a decrease in T2* leading to darkening in tissues containing the vessel in a T2*-weighted imaging protocol. A limitation is that it is also sensitive to changes in Hb concentration (due to alterations in vascular volume and flow as well as interconversion of oxy- and deoxy-haemoglobin). Therefore, this technique provides qualitative assessment of changes in oxygenation rather than quantitative measurements. The technique is widely used for functional brain mapping [104, 105], where it is thought to primarily reflect changes in flow.
Baudelet and Gallez have rigorously investigated correlations between pO2 estimated using fibre optic probes and BOLD signal changes and have found general correlations, but a given BOLD response may reflect vastly different changes in pO2 [102]. BOLD MRI has the advantage of both high spatial and temporal resolution and it can be repeated as needed; however, it can be susceptible to subtle motion artefacts [106]. Rijpkema et al. used BOLD to evaluate patients during the ARCON trial for head and neck cancer and found significant changes in T2*-weighted MRI contrast accompanying hyperoxic gas breathing [107]. No accompanying changes were observed by traditional T1-weighted gadolinium dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Preliminary analysis of 11 women being treated with chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer showed a significantly different BOLD response to breathing oxygen before the course of chemotherapy for tumours of women with good therapeutic outcome versus those with poor response. Indeed, three women with complete pathologic response showed a signal change greater than 7%, whereas those with poor outcome showed less than 3% [108]. It is arguable whether the differential response reflects perfusion or oxygenation, but traditional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI failed to provide similar discrimination.
The biologic sequelae of hypoxia are also amenable to imaging. Prolonged hypoxia can lead to increased lactate in tissues and 1H MRI can be used to image lactate [109, 110]. Furthermore, alteration of the redox state of nonprotein thiols, such as glutathione, adenine nucleotide redox state, NADH or NADPH in hypoxic cells can lead to accumulation of radiopharmaceuticals in hypoxia. All of these tests measure downstream consequences of hypoxia and often do not instantly return to normal values after an adequate O2 supply has been established. For more information, the reader is referred to a recent review that addressed the role of functional MRI (fMRI) methods to assess tumour oxygenation for predicting outcome [111].
PET imaging of hypoxia
Positron emission tomography (PET) has inherent advantages for studying hypoxia, as it can employ radiotracer probes that directly report on cellular oxygen levels, and not via hypoxia-mediated changes in phenotype, thereby permitting the non-invasive and three-dimensional assessment of intratumour oxygen levels in a more direct manner [112]. In contrast to histologic characterisation, PET can monitor whole tumours although at low spatial resolution [113]. PET has very high sensitivity and specificity compared to MR imaging and it enables the identification of regional hypoxia in vivo in preclinical and clinical settings [103].
PET tracers for hypoxia imaging and their mechanisms of action
The criteria for development of radiotracer probes includes improving relative tumour uptake by using isotopes with longer half-lives and ensuring rapid clearance of the parent compound from systemic circulation and normoxic tissue (hydrophilic compounds), while being sufficiently lipophilic to enter cells and allow uniform tissue distribution. The charcteristics of an ideal hypoxic tracer include: retention in low partial oxygen pressure (pO2) regions (hypoxia specific), pharmacokinetic profile and tissue distribution independent of confounding factors such as blood flow/tissue perfusion or pH, high stability, suitable tissue kinetics to enable imaging in a specified time frame, ease of synthesis, favourable dosimetry profile, reproducibility and effectiveness in multiple tumour types.
Radionuclide detection of hypoxia in tumours was first reported in 1981 with [14C]misonidazole autoradiography [114]. Subsequently, two main tracer classes have been developed to specifically study regional tumour hypoxia with PET: [18F]labelled nitroimidazoles and Cu-labelled diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) analogues [112]. Multiple PET tracers suitable for the detection of hypoxia have been developed, validated and shown to exhibit different characteristics; some of these are discussed in Table 3 [115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127]. The first [18F]labelled drug to be clinically tested was fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) [128] and it remains the most extensively tested agent [129, 130].
[18F]Nitroimidazoles
2-Nitroimidazole compounds were originally developed as hypoxic cell radiosensitisers and were introduced as hypoxia markers in the 1970s (Fig. 2) [115]. Nitroimidazoles enter cells by passive diffusion and subsequently undergo reduction forming reactive intermediate species. Hypoxic conditions cause further reduction of the nitro-anion radical, which is irreversibly trapped in the cell when the oxygen tension is less than 10 mmHg [129]. The reduction of nitroimidazoles requires the presence of ubiquitously expressed tissue reductases, which enables these compounds to accumulate within viable hypoxic cells, but not apoptotic or necrotic cells [130,130,132]. Under normoxic conditions, nitro-anion radical is re-oxidised into the parent compound, which can diffuse out of the cell. The mechanism of of [18F]MISO intracellular trapping is shown in Fig. 3 [133]. Therefore, hypoxic tissues can be delineated as an area of high tracer uptake after allowing a sufficient period of time for the nonspecific tracer to be excreted from the cells [134, 135].
FMISO uptake was closely correlated with pimonidazole immunohistochemistry and has been found to reflect hypoxia in head-and-neck cancer [136,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,146], glioma [147,147,148,149,150,152], colorectal cancer [153], breast cancer [154], lung cancer [155, 156], and renal cell carcinoma [157, 158].
In view of FMISO’s slow plasma clearance, FMISO imaging usually requires an interval of longer than 2 h (ideally 4 h) after administration to obtain good contrast [159] with a hypoxia threshold in general defined as SUVmax of 1.5 or tumour:muscle ratio of 1.4 [103]. Although its biodistribution properties do not result in high-contrast images, the 2-h image unambiguously reflects regional pO2 in the range where it is clinically significant. However, due to perceived concerns regarding FMISO stability in vivo [160], metabolite formation, slow clearance properties [129], and failure to achieve image intensities in humans comparable to what had been achieved in animal models, alternative hypoxia PET tracers with different clearance and hydrophilicity characteristics have been developed in an attempt to overcome these limitations. These include fluoroazomycin arabinoside (FAZA), fluoroerythronitroimidazole (FETNIM), fluoroetanidazole (Fig. 4), and fluorinated etanidazole derivatives (EF3, EF5), HX4 [161,161,163].
[18F]Fluoroazomycin-arabinofuranoside (FAZA)
[18F]Fluoroazomycin-arabinofuranoside (FAZA) is more hydrophilic than FMISO. Consequently, it has faster clearance kinetics, resulting in improved tumour-to-reference tissue ratios, and thus hypoxia-to-normoxia contrast. Head-to-head comparisons between FAZA, [124I]IAZA, and FMISO in preclinical animal studies imaged at 3 h after injection demonstrated faster vascular clearance of FAZA, resulting in an increased tumour-to-blood ratio (5.19) relative to that of [18F]fluoromisonidazole (3.98). More recently, clinical studies have successfully evaluated the feasibility of FAZA for imaging hypoxia in gliomas [118], lymphomas [118], lung [164, 165], head-and-neck [118, 166,166,168], cervical [169], and rectal tumours [170], and the results have been shown to compare favourably with equivalent FMISO data, especially as improved hypoxic–normoxic contrast was obtained at earlier time points. High FAZA tumour-to-reference tissue values have been associated with reduced disease-free survival and have shown prognostic potential in the detection of hypoxia in head-and-neck patients [167]. Due to the higher tumour-to-reference tissue ratios in comparison with FMISO, FAZA is gaining popularity for PET imaging of tumour hypoxia. Despite the fact that FAZA is not widely available at present, increasing research demand may persuade more sites to produce it.
Next-generation tracers
[18F]2-(2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-Pentafluoropropyl)-acetamide (EF5)
The nitroimidazole EF5 has been extensively used for ex vivo immunohistochemical detection of bioreduced adducts, which indicate regions of tumour hypoxia. However, [18F]2-(2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl)-acetamide (EF5), first investigated as a hypoxia PET tracer in 2001 [171], has only recently appeared in the clinical setting. In contrast to many of the second-generation hypoxia tracers, EF5 is highly lipophilic, resulting in greater cell membrane permeability and slower blood clearance [119], thus improving rates of tumour uptake and homogeneity of tracer distribution. The main drawback of EF5 is the complex labelling chemistry in comparison to the simple nucleophilic displacement reactions used for the mono-fluorinated 2-nitroimidazoles [171].
[18F]3-fluoro-2-(4-((2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)Methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propan-1-ol (HX4)
[18F]3-fluoro-2-(4-((2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propan-1-ol (HX4), a next-generation 2-nitroimidazole tracer contains a 1,2,3-anti-triazole moiety (as a synthetic convenience) rendering it more hydrophilic than FMISO, specifically designed to maximize pharmacokinetic and clearance properties. Initial studies in humans demonstrate rapid renal clearance and urinary excretion of HX4, with a favourable dosimetry profile similar to that of FMISO [120].
Preclinical studies validated that the tracer uptake was indeed oxygen-dependent though tumour-to-background ratios appeared similar to those reported for FMISO in studies using the same tumour model [172]; thus, it remains to be seen if HX4 provides any significant advantage over FMISO in a clinical setting. A phase I study of 6 patients (4 non-small-cell lung carcinoma, 1 thymus carcinoma, and 1 colon carcinoma) has shown a median tumour-to-muscle ratio of 1.40 at 120 min after injection, although no attempt was made to determine the optimal imaging time points [120]. In head-and-neck tumours, HX4 produced tumour-to-reference tissue values similar to FMISO at relatively early time points post injection, indicating the potential advantage of shorter acquisition times [173]. A more recent study in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients [174] suggested that later scan times (2–4 h p.i.) can further enhance the hypoxic-to-normoxic signal.
[18F]Fluoroerythronitromidazole (FETNIM)
The hydrophilic nature of [18F]Fluoroerythronitromidazole (FETNIM) accounts for its rapid renal clearance and low liver uptake, compared with FMISO. This also could explain the positive correlation between tumour blood flow and initial tumour FETNIM uptake [121]. Recent clinical studies in head-and-neck [121, 175, 176], lung [177, 178], cervical cancer [179], and oesophageal cancer [180] showed that high tissue uptake of FETNIM was indicative of reduced progression-free and overall survival. However, as with HX4, it is not clear whether the use of this tracer presents any advantages over FMISO imaging protocols. Clinical studies with FETNIM have been mainly carried out at the University of Turku, Finland.
[18F]1-(2-1-(1H-methyl)ethoxy)-methyl-2-nitroimidazole (RP-170)
1-(2-1-(1H-methyl)ethoxy)-methyl-2-nitroimidazole was developed as a 2-nitroimidazole-based hypoxic radiosensitiser, which has also been labelled with fluorine-18 ([18F]RP-170). The hypoxic selectivity of RP-170 was demonstrated in glioma patients on the basis of significant correlations between uptake, oxygen tension measurements, and HIF1alpha immunostaining [123]. Studies in brain [123, 181] and lung [182] tumours indicated higher SUV (calculated at 1 h post injection), for hypoxic than normal tissues. The shorter interval before scanning, combined with improved hypoxic contrast compared with FMISO, could make it attractive for clinical imaging.
Copper (Cu)-diacetyl-bis (N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) (Cu-ATSM)
An alternative class of agents for the study of hypoxia with PET that has been intensively investigated in both preclinical and clinical studies is the complex of Cu with diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) (ATSM) ligands, among which ATSM is the prototype (Fig. 5). The potential of these agents for hypoxia imaging was first reported by Fujibayashi et al. [124]. Copper (Cu)-diacetyl-bis (N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) (Cu-ATSM) is a hypoxic marker that is selectively retained in hypoxic tissues. Cu-ATSM rapidly diffuses into the cells due to its high membrane permeability and low redox potential, secondary to its lipophilicity and low molecular weight. After cellular entry, Cu(II)-ATSM is reduced to an unstable Cu(I)-ATSM species, which further dissociates into the metal complex Cu(I), and ATSM, thus irreversibly trapping the Cu(I) within the cellular copper metabolic processes (Fig. 6) [183]. In normoxic conditions, the [Cu(I)-ATSM] can be re-oxidised to its parent compound, allowing efflux from the cell [184]. One of the advantages of Cu-ATSM is that it can reveal molecular contrast within 10–15 min post injection mainly due to its rapid tracer kinetics [125, 185].
However, it has been observed that high uptake in tumours may only partly be a direct consequence of hypoxia [185]. Nevertheless, extremely high-contrast images of Cu-ATSM have been obtained in a variety of tumour sites [186]. The lack of correlation between Cu-ATSM distribution and immunohistochemistry hypoxia markers casted some doubt on the hypoxia selectivity of Cu-ATSM [187]. The suggested reason for the low correlation between Cu-ATSM uptake and hypoxic distribution, in some tumours, was the differing redox status of the tumour types. This has been further seen in pre-clinical experiments, where it was demonstrated that in the cell lines tested, [64Cu]Cu-ATSM and [64Cu]Cu-acetate had almost identical uptake in vivo over 2–16 h, post injection. However, up to 1 h post injection, [64Cu]Cu-acetate had a superior tumour-to-muscle ratio [188]. Several factors could explain the phenomenon; indeed, some tumours might have a lower than-average redox potential with high concentrations of electron donors causing reduction and trapping of Cu-ATSM in both hypoxic and normoxic areas. This observation does not discount the fact that [64Cu]Cu-ATSM may still be clinically relevant as a tracer for hypoxia, perhaps HIF1 status, as suggested by some investigators [189]. The timing of image acquisition is crucial, as the initial phase of tracer uptake can be perfusion and hypoxia-driven, whereas at later time points uptake is probably more indicative of tumour hypoxia.
Validation of MRI and PET hypoxia imaging
As discussed thus far, both MRI and PET play an important role in hypoxia imaging. However, there are few reports that compare these two imaging modalities. Preclinically, a clear correlation between [18F]FAZA PET image intensities and tumour oxygenation was demonstrated by Tran et al. [190]. [18F]FAZA accurately showed improved uptake when rats with subcutaneous rhabdomyosarcomas were treated with air, in contrast to carbogen. This correlated well with an invasive OxyLite probe, although the probe demonstrated a relatively high heterogeneity in the oxygen value measured depending on the specific point within the tumour. Functional MRI ([19F]MRI, however, did not show any discernible difference in T1 spin–lattice relaxation time. In a more recent study, Valable et al. validated tissue saturation studied by MRI against FMISO PET wth high sensitivity and specificity in a rat glioma model [191].
In the clinical setting, Swanson et al. performed a detailed spatial analysis of the hypoxic tumour burden visible on the FMISO PET relative to the imaging changes associated with tumour neovasculature, necrosis, invasion, and edema seen on gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI (T1Gd) in 24 patients with glioblastoma [152]. Hypoxic Volume (HV), defined within the tumour as sections that had a tumour-to-blood ratio of higher than 1.2, showed a consistent correlation with the MRI-defined regions within the tumour, supporting the idea that there is a definite link between the PET and MRI images of hypoxia. Furthermore, it was found that HV, and the respective surface areas of HV and T1Gd abnormality were the most significant predictors of survival. Simoncic et al., showed a strong correlation between FMISO PET and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) kinetic parameters in 6 head and neck cancer patients [192].
These studies suggest that both MRI and PET could complement each other and provide a future direction in selecting the best modality to image hypoxia.
Clinical applications
There is evidence from numerous clinical studies across a range of tumour types to support the existence and importance of the “hypoxia driver” phenotype both in pre-clinical [193,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,219] (Table 4) and clinical studies [220,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,247] (Table 5).
Identification of tumour hypoxia and prediction of prognosis/response to treatment
The clinical significance of hypoxia PET imaging is to identify individuals with poor prognosis and those likely to benefit from hypoxia-targeted therapy. Several studies have shown that hypoxia PET imaging predicts outcome. High FMISO retention has been associated with higher risk of loco-regional failure and shorter progression-free survival in head-and-neck [142, 248, 249, 252,252,254] and renal cancer [158]. Furthermore, a meta-review of the clinical data of over 300 patients concluded that FMISO is a predictor of poor treatment response and prognosis [131]. Similarly, FETNIM uptake in lung [176], head-and-neck [175], and oesophageal cancer [180], were also associated with poor outcomes. Studies conducted with FAZA in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck [167] and Cu-ATSM in patients with cervical [125, 261, 263], lung [125, 261], and rectal cancer [262] have shown that lower tumour-to-muscle ratio (TMR) is indicative of better prognosis.
These findings have been discussed in a recent meta-analysis of PET hypoxia studies which have demonstrated a common tendency towards predicting outcome in tumours showing higher tracer accumulation [162]. Decreased FMISO uptake with treatment has been widely reported in brain [152], head-and-neck [250, 255], lung [258, 260], and renal tumours [158]; although this was not seen in some tumours [142, 156]. Decrease in semi-quantitative imaging parameters such as tumour-to-muscle ratios (TMRs) signifying response to chemotherapy have also been demonstrated with Cu-ATSM in lung [125, 261] and head-and-neck tumours [257], and FAZA in lung cancer [165].
Radiotherapy planning
It is well known that tumours demonstrate temporal changes and/or heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of hypoxia. Identification of these areas with PET hypoxia scans enables image guidance and hence, radiation dose escalation to radioresistant sub-volumes [162, 248, 259]. Boosting the dose to intra-tumoural areas of biological resistance (dose painting) is being pursued as a strategy to overcome radioresistance and improve outcomes [264]. This is made possible due to the advances in imaging and radiation treatment planning. The feasibility of this strategy has been investigated in cancers of the head and neck, lung, and brain with Cu-ATSM [256], FMISO [251], and FAZA [166], mostly on anthrophomorphic phantoms [166, 249, 251], and further studies are required for translation into clinical benefit.
Discussion and concluding remarks
Hypoxia research has a long history; however, accurate and reproducible measurement of clinically relevant hypoxia with high sensitivity continues to evade the scientific community. Although radionuclide measurements of hypoxia started in the early 1980s we are yet to have a widely accepted method. In addition to studies with oxygen electrodes, imaging utilising exognous probes including FMISO-PET, FAZA-PET, HX4, and immunohistochemistry with pimonidazole have been the mainstay of hypoxia assessment in clinical studies; the EU-funded METOXIA consortium for example utilises HX4 for assessment of hypoxia [265]. In the post-genome era, genetic methods are also making an important entrance—with a 26-gene signature in validation for assessing hypoxia [266]. There have been some successes in the use of hypoxia measurements as part of clinical trials: a number of studies confirmed that hypoxia predicts locoregional failure to radiotherapy [81, 267, 268] and chemoradiotherapy with hypoxia-modulated cytotoxin tirapazamine [249]. Conversely, there have been several challenges, in particular poor sensitivity of the methods requiring long assessment periods (as pertains to nitroimidazole PET methods), invasive nature (as pertains to pimonidazole immunohistochemistry), an inability to relate measured output to oxygen tension (as pertains to MRI methods despite high spatial resolution) and wide heterogeneity within and between the tumours of the same patients and temporally with treatment (all methods).
Notably, despite design of newer nitroimidazoles with substantially different physicochemical properties—high hydrophilicity—concomitant improvements in signal-to-noise ratio and, thus, reduction in imaging times, have not been achieved, indicating that the ideal chemical design has not yet been realised. There is also paucity of studies examining heterogeneity of hypoxia using parametric imaging to detect the influence of hypoxia sub-volumes and whether this additional detail will have prognostic or predictive value. With the advent of PET-MRI scanners, it will be feasible to multiplex imaging modalities to provide addition information such as perfusion to increase accuracy of hypoxia measurements or provide complementary information with higher predictive value. Whatever selected method will require assessment of precision of measurement which is non-trivial with such a spatio-temporally evanescent phenomenon as hypoxia.
Thus, it is accepted that hypoxia could have significant prognostic and predictive value in the clinic; however, the best method for hypoxia assessment has in our opinion not been realised.
References
Brown JM, Wilson WR (2004) Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment. Nat Rev Cancer 4(6):437–447. doi:10.1038/nrc1367
Vaupel P (2004) The role of hypoxia-induced factors in tumor progression. Oncologist 9(Suppl 5):10–17. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.9-90005-10
Thomlinson RH, Gray LH (1955) The histological structure of some human lung cancers and the possible implications for radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 9(4):539–549
Dewhirst MW, Ong ET, Braun RD, Smith B, Klitzman B, Evans SM, Wilson D (1999) Quantification of longitudinal tissue pO2 gradients in window chamber tumours: impact on tumour hypoxia. Br J Cancer 79(11–12):1717–1722. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6690273
Chan N, Koritzinsky M, Zhao H, Bindra R, Glazer PM, Powell S, Belmaaza A, Wouters B, Bristow RG (2008) Chronic hypoxia decreases synthesis of homologous recombination proteins to offset chemoresistance and radioresistance. Cancer Res 68(2):605–614. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5472
Luoto KR, Kumareswaran R, Bristow RG (2013) Tumor hypoxia as a driving force in genetic instability. Genome Integr 4(1):5. doi:10.1186/2041-9414-4-5
Brown JM (1979) Evidence for acutely hypoxic cells in mouse tumours, and a possible mechanism of reoxygenation. Br J Radiol 52(620):650–656. doi:10.1259/0007-1285-52-620-650
Brurberg KG, Graff BA, Olsen DR, Rofstad EK (2004) Tumor-line specific pO(2) fluctuations in human melanoma xenografts. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58(2):403–409 (S0360301603019886 [pii])
Chaplin DJ, Olive PL, Durand RE (1987) Intermittent blood flow in a murine tumor: radiobiological effects. Cancer Res 47(2):597–601
Bayer C, Vaupel P (2012) Acute versus chronic hypoxia in tumors: controversial data concerning time frames and biological consequences. Strahlenther Onkol 188(7):616–627. doi:10.1007/s00066-012-0085-4
Ellingsen C, Ovrebo KM, Galappathi K, Mathiesen B, Rofstad EK (2012) pO(2) fluctuation pattern and cycling hypoxia in human cervical carcinoma and melanoma xenografts. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83(4):1317–1323. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.037
Vaupel P, Mayer A (2014) Hypoxia in tumors: pathogenesis-related classification, characterization of hypoxia subtypes, and associated biological and clinical implications. Adv Exp Med Biol 812:19–24. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0620-8_3
Hsieh CH, Lee CH, Liang JA, Yu CY, Shyu WC (2010) Cycling hypoxia increases U87 glioma cell radioresistance via ROS induced higher and long-term HIF-1 signal transduction activity. Oncol Rep 24(6):1629–1636
Rouschop KM, Ramaekers CH, Schaaf MB, Keulers TG, Savelkouls KG, Lambin P, Koritzinsky M, Wouters BG (2009) Autophagy is required during cycling hypoxia to lower production of reactive oxygen species. Radiother Oncol 92(3):411–416. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.06.029
Koritzinsky M, Wouters BG (2013) The roles of reactive oxygen species and autophagy in mediating the tolerance of tumor cells to cycling hypoxia. Semin Radiat Oncol 23(4):252–261. doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2013.05.006
Kato Y, Yashiro M, Fuyuhiro Y, Kashiwagi S, Matsuoka J, Hirakawa T, Noda S, Aomatsu N, Hasegawa T, Matsuzaki T, Sawada T, Ohira M, Hirakawa K (2011) Effects of acute and chronic hypoxia on the radiosensitivity of gastric and esophageal cancer cells. Anticancer Res 31(10):3369–3375 (31/10/3369 [pii])
Bellot G, Garcia-Medina R, Gounon P, Chiche J, Roux D, Pouyssegur J, Mazure NM (2009) Hypoxia-induced autophagy is mediated through hypoxia-inducible factor induction of BNIP3 and BNIP3L via their BH3 domains. Mol Cell Biol 29(10):2570–2581. doi:10.1128/MCB.00166-09
Rofstad EK, Gaustad JV, Egeland TA, Mathiesen B, Galappathi K (2010) Tumors exposed to acute cyclic hypoxic stress show enhanced angiogenesis, perfusion and metastatic dissemination. Int J Cancer 127(7):1535–1546. doi:10.1002/ijc.25176
Pires I, Silva F, Queiroga FL, Rodrigues P, Henriques R, Pinto CA, Lopes C (2010) Epithelioid hemangiosarcomas of the bovine urinary bladder: a histologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural examination of four tumors. J Vet Diagn Invest 22(1):116–119 (22/1/116 [pii])
Bristow RG, Berlin A, Dal Pra A (2014) An arranged marriage for precision medicine: hypoxia and genomic assays in localized prostate cancer radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 87(1035):20130753. doi:10.1259/bjr.20130753
Meijer TW, Kaanders JH, Span PN, Bussink J (2012) Targeting hypoxia, HIF-1, and tumor glucose metabolism to improve radiotherapy efficacy. Clin Cancer Res 18(20):5585–5594. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0858
Zagzag D, Krishnamachary B, Yee H, Okuyama H, Chiriboga L, Ali MA, Melamed J, Semenza GL (2005) Stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha and CXCR4 expression in hemangioblastoma and clear cell-renal cell carcinoma: von Hippel-Lindau loss-of-function induces expression of a ligand and its receptor. Cancer Res 65(14):6178–6188. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4406
Semenza GL (2013) HIF-1 mediates metabolic responses to intratumoral hypoxia and oncogenic mutations. J Clin Invest 123(9):3664–3671. doi:10.1172/JCI67230
Guo K, Searfoss G, Krolikowski D, Pagnoni M, Franks C, Clark K, Yu KT, Jaye M, Ivashchenko Y (2001) Hypoxia induces the expression of the pro-apoptotic gene BNIP3. Cell Death Differ 8(4):367–376. doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4400810
Krishnamachary B, Berg-Dixon S, Kelly B, Agani F, Feldser D, Ferreira G, Iyer N, LaRusch J, Pak B, Taghavi P, Semenza GL (2003) Regulation of colon carcinoma cell invasion by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Cancer Res 63(5):1138–1143
Krishnamachary B, Zagzag D, Nagasawa H, Rainey K, Okuyama H, Baek JH, Semenza GL (2006) Hypoxia-inducible factor-1-dependent repression of E-cadherin in von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor-null renal cell carcinoma mediated by TCF3, ZFHX1A, and ZFHX1B. Cancer Res 66(5):2725–2731. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3719
Azab AK, Hu J, Quang P, Azab F, Pitsillides C, Awwad R, Thompson B, Maiso P, Sun JD, Hart CP, Roccaro AM, Sacco A, Ngo HT, Lin CP, Kung AL, Carrasco RD, Vanderkerken K, Ghobrial IM (2012) Hypoxia promotes dissemination of multiple myeloma through acquisition of epithelial to mesenchymal transition-like features. Blood 119(24):5782–5794. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-09-380410
Wouters BG, Koritzinsky M (2008) Hypoxia signalling through mTOR and the unfolded protein response in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 8(11):851–864. doi:10.1038/nrc2501
Nagelkerke A, Bussink J, Mujcic H, Wouters BG, Lehmann S, Sweep FC, Span PN (2013) Hypoxia stimulates migration of breast cancer cells via the PERK/ATF4/LAMP3-arm of the unfolded protein response. Breast Cancer Res 15(1):R2. doi:10.1186/bcr3373
Nagelkerke A, Bussink J, van der Kogel AJ, Sweep FC, Span PN (2013) The PERK/ATF4/LAMP3-arm of the unfolded protein response affects radioresistance by interfering with the DNA damage response. Radiother Oncol 108(3):415–421. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.037
Nagelkerke A, Sieuwerts AM, Bussink J, Sweep FC, Look MP, Foekens JA, Martens JW, Span PN (2014) LAMP3 is involved in tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells through the modulation of autophagy. Endocr Relat Cancer 21(1):101–112. doi:10.1530/ERC-13-0183
Nagelkerke A, Bussink J, Sweep FC (1846) Span PN (2014) The unfolded protein response as a target for cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta 2:277–284. doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.07.006
Leung AK, Sharp PA (2010) MicroRNA functions in stress responses. Mol Cell 40(2):205–215. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.027
Tsai YP, Wu KJ (2014) Epigenetic regulation of hypoxia-responsive gene expression: focusing on chromatin and DNA modifications. Int J Cancer 134(2):249–256. doi:10.1002/ijc.28190
Johnson AB, Barton MC (2007) Hypoxia-induced and stress-specific changes in chromatin structure and function. Mutat Res 618(1–2):149–162. doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.10.007
Graeber TG, Osmanian C, Jacks T, Housman DE, Koch CJ, Lowe SW, Giaccia AJ (1996) Hypoxia-mediated selection of cells with diminished apoptotic potential in solid tumours. Nature 379(6560):88–91. doi:10.1038/379088a0
Gillies RJ, Gatenby RA (2007) Adaptive landscapes and emergent phenotypes: why do cancers have high glycolysis? J Bioenerg Biomembr 39(3):251–257. doi:10.1007/s10863-007-9085-y
McFate T, Mohyeldin A, Lu H, Thakar J, Henriques J, Halim ND, Wu H, Schell MJ, Tsang TM, Teahan O, Zhou S, Califano JA, Jeoung NH, Harris RA, Verma A (2008) Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity controls metabolic and malignant phenotype in cancer cells. J Biol Chem 283(33):22700–22708. doi:10.1074/jbc.M801765200
Bristow RG, Hill RP (2008) Hypoxia and metabolism. Hypoxia, DNA repair and genetic instability. Nat Rev Cancer 8(3):180–192. doi:10.1038/nrc2344
Brunelle JK, Bell EL, Quesada NM, Vercauteren K, Tiranti V, Zeviani M, Scarpulla RC, Chandel NS (2005) Oxygen sensing requires mitochondrial ROS but not oxidative phosphorylation. Cell Metab 1(6):409–414. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.002
Carmeliet P (2005) Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature 438(7070):932–936. doi:10.1038/nature04478
Carmeliet P, Jain RK (2011) Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature 473(7347):298–307. doi:10.1038/nature10144
de la Puente P, Muz B, Azab F, Azab AK (2013) Cell trafficking of endothelial progenitor cells in tumor progression. Clin Cancer Res 19(13):3360–3368. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0462
Hockel M, Schlenger K, Aral B, Mitze M, Schaffer U, Vaupel P (1996) Association between tumor hypoxia and malignant progression in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Cancer Res 56(19):4509–4515
Kim JW, Tchernyshyov I, Semenza GL, Dang CV (2006) HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: a metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia. Cell Metab 3(3):177–185. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2006.02.002
Krock BL, Skuli N, Simon MC (2011) Hypoxia-induced angiogenesis: good and evil. Genes Cancer 2(12):1117–1133. doi:10.1177/1947601911423654
Lou Y, McDonald PC, Oloumi A, Chia S, Ostlund C, Ahmadi A, Kyle A, Auf dem Keller U, Leung S, Huntsman D, Clarke B, Sutherland BW, Waterhouse D, Bally M, Roskelley C, Overall CM, Minchinton A, Pacchiano F, Carta F, Scozzafava A, Touisni N, Winum JY, Supuran CT, Dedhar S (2011) Targeting tumor hypoxia: suppression of breast tumor growth and metastasis by novel carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors. Cancer Res 71(9):3364–3376. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4261
Lum JJ, Bui T, Gruber M, Gordan JD, DeBerardinis RJ, Covello KL, Simon MC, Thompson CB (2007) The transcription factor HIF-1alpha plays a critical role in the growth factor-dependent regulation of both aerobic and anaerobic glycolysis. Genes Dev 21(9):1037–1049. doi:10.1101/gad.1529107
Pouyssegur J, Dayan F, Mazure NM (2006) Hypoxia signalling in cancer and approaches to enforce tumour regression. Nature 441(7092):437–443. doi:10.1038/nature04871
Terris DJ, Ho EY, Ibrahim HZ, Dorie MJ, Kovacs MS, Le QT, Koong AC, Pinto HA, Brown JM (2002) Estimating DNA repair by sequential evaluation of head and neck tumor radiation sensitivity using the comet assay. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(6):698–702 (ooa00219 [pii])
Thiery JP, Sleeman JP (2006) Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7(2):131–142. doi:10.1038/nrm1835
Yin J, Miyazaki K, Shaner RL, Merrill AH Jr, Kannagi R (2010) Altered sphingolipid metabolism induced by tumor hypoxia—new vistas in glycolipid tumor markers. FEBS Lett 584(9):1872–1878. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.019
Hockel M, Vaupel P (2001) Tumor hypoxia: definitions and current clinical, biologic, and molecular aspects. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(4):266–276
Rademakers SE, Span PN, Kaanders JH, Sweep FC, van der Kogel AJ, Bussink J (2008) Molecular aspects of tumour hypoxia. Mol Oncol 2(1):41–53. doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2008.03.006
Sounni NE, Noel A (2013) Targeting the tumor microenvironment for cancer therapy. Clin Chem 59(1):85–93. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2012.185363
Casazza A, Di Conza G, Wenes M, Finisguerra V, Deschoemaeker S, Mazzone M (2014) Tumor stroma: a complexity dictated by the hypoxic tumor microenvironment. Oncogene 33(14):1743–1754. doi:10.1038/onc.2013.121
Tafani M, Pucci B, Russo A, Schito L, Pellegrini L, Perrone GA, Villanova L, Salvatori L, Ravenna L, Petrangeli E, Russo MA (2013) Modulators of HIF1alpha and NFkB in cancer treatment: is it a rational approach for controlling malignant progression? Front Pharmacol 4:13. doi:10.3389/fphar.2013.00013
Muz B, de la Puente P, Azab F, Azab AK (2015) The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Hypoxia (Auckl) 3:83–92. doi:10.2147/HP.S93413
Zeng W, Liu P, Pan W, Singh SR, Wei Y (2015) Hypoxia and hypoxia inducible factors in tumor metabolism. Cancer Lett 356(2 Pt A):263–267 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.01.032
Tan Q, Saggar JK, Yu M, Wang M, Tannock IF (2015) Mechanisms of drug resistance related to the microenvironment of solid tumors and possible strategies to inhibit them. Cancer J 21(4):254–262. doi:10.1097/PPO.0000000000000131
Yu M, Ocana A, Tannock IF (2013) Reversal of ATP-binding cassette drug transporter activity to modulate chemoresistance: why has it failed to provide clinical benefit? Cancer Metastasis Rev 32(1–2):211–227. doi:10.1007/s10555-012-9402-8
Zhao Q, Li Y, Tan BB, Fan LQ, Yang PG, Tian Y (2015) HIF-1alpha induces multidrug resistance in gastric cancer cells by inducing MiR-27a. PLoS One 10(8):e0132746. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132746
Chen J, Ding Z, Peng Y, Pan F, Li J, Zou L, Zhang Y, Liang H (2014) HIF-1alpha inhibition reverses multidrug resistance in colon cancer cells via downregulation of MDR1/P-glycoprotein. PLoS One 9(6):e98882. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098882
Thews O, Gassner B, Kelleher DK, Gekle M (2008) Activity of drug efflux transporters in tumor cells under hypoxic conditions. Adv Exp Med Biol 614:157–164. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74911-2_19
Thews O, Gassner B, Kelleher DK, Schwerdt G, Gekle M (2006) Impact of extracellular acidity on the activity of p-glycoprotein and the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs. Neoplasia 8(2):143–152. doi:10.1593/neo.05697
Dorr RT (1992) Bleomycin pharmacology: mechanism of action and resistance, and clinical pharmacokinetics. Semin Oncol 19(2 Suppl 5):3–8
Chen J, Stubbe J (2005) Bleomycins: towards better therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer 5(2):102–112. doi:10.1038/nrc1547
Cosse JP, Michiels C (2008) Tumour hypoxia affects the responsiveness of cancer cells to chemotherapy and promotes cancer progression. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 8(7):790–797
Hunter FW, Wouters BG, Wilson WR (2016) Hypoxia-activated prodrugs: paths forward in the era of personalised medicine. Br J Cancer 114(10):1071–1077. doi:10.1038/bjc.2016.79
Minchinton AI, Tannock IF (2006) Drug penetration in solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer 6(8):583–592. doi:10.1038/nrc1893
Du J, Chen Y, Li Q, Han X, Cheng C, Wang Z, Danielpour D, Dunwoodie SL, Bunting KD, Yang YC (2012) HIF-1alpha deletion partially rescues defects of hematopoietic stem cell quiescence caused by Cited2 deficiency. Blood 119(12):2789–2798. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-10-387902
Das B, Tsuchida R, Malkin D, Koren G, Baruchel S, Yeger H (2008) Hypoxia enhances tumor stemness by increasing the invasive and tumorigenic side population fraction. Stem Cells 26(7):1818–1830. doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-0724
Ishii A, Kimura T, Sadahiro H, Kawano H, Takubo K, Suzuki M, Ikeda E (2016) Histological characterization of the tumorigenic “peri-necrotic niche” harboring quiescent stem-like tumor cells in glioblastoma. PLoS ONE 11(1):e0147366. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147366
Gordan JD, Bertout JA, Hu CJ, Diehl JA, Simon MC (2007) HIF-2alpha promotes hypoxic cell proliferation by enhancing c-myc transcriptional activity. Cancer Cell 11(4):335–347. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2007.02.006
Gordan JD, Thompson CB, Simon MC (2007) HIF and c-Myc: sibling rivals for control of cancer cell metabolism and proliferation. Cancer Cell 12(2):108–113. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2007.07.006
Sullivan R, Pare GC, Frederiksen LJ, Semenza GL, Graham CH (2008) Hypoxia-induced resistance to anticancer drugs is associated with decreased senescence and requires hypoxia-inducible factor-1 activity. Mol Cancer Ther 7(7):1961–1973. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0198
Barker HE, Paget JT, Khan AA, Harrington KJ (2015) The tumour microenvironment after radiotherapy: mechanisms of resistance and recurrence. Nat Rev Cancer 15(7):409–425. doi:10.1038/nrc3958
Hockel M, Knoop C, Schlenger K, Vorndran B, Baussmann E, Mitze M, Knapstein PG, Vaupel P (1993) Intratumoral pO2 predicts survival in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Radiother Oncol 26(1):45–50
Hockel M, Schlenger K, Knoop C, Vaupel P (1991) Oxygenation of carcinomas of the uterine cervix: evaluation by computerized O2 tension measurements. Cancer Res 51(22):6098–6102
Vaupel P, Schlenger K, Knoop C, Hockel M (1991) Oxygenation of human tumors: evaluation of tissue oxygen distribution in breast cancers by computerized O2 tension measurements. Cancer Res 51(12):3316–3322
Nordsmark M, Bentzen SM, Rudat V, Brizel D, Lartigau E, Stadler P, Becker A, Adam M, Molls M, Dunst J, Terris DJ, Overgaard J (2005) Prognostic value of tumor oxygenation in 397 head and neck tumors after primary radiation therapy. An international multi-center study. Radiother Oncol 77(1):18–24. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.038
Rudat V, Vanselow B, Wollensack P, Bettscheider C, Osman-Ahmet S, Eble MJ, Dietz A (2000) Repeatability and prognostic impact of the pretreatment pO(2) histography in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 57(1):31–37 (S0167-8140(00)00200-0 [pii])
Rudat V, Stadler P, Becker A, Vanselow B, Dietz A, Wannenmacher M, Molls M, Dunst J, Feldmann HJ (2001) Predictive value of the tumor oxygenation by means of pO2 histography in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 177(9):462–468
Bussink J, Kaanders JH, Strik AM, van der Kogel AJ (2000) Effects of nicotinamide and carbogen on oxygenation in human tumor xenografts measured with luminescense based fiber-optic probes. Radiother Oncol 57(1):21–30 (S0167-8140(00)00275-9 [pii])
Kaanders JH, Wijffels KI, Marres HA, Ljungkvist AS, Pop LA, van den Hoogen FJ, de Wilde PC, Bussink J, Raleigh JA, van der Kogel AJ (2002) Pimonidazole binding and tumor vascularity predict for treatment outcome in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res 62(23):7066–7074
Evans SM, Du KL, Chalian AA, Mick R, Zhang PJ, Hahn SM, Quon H, Lustig R, Weinstein GS, Koch CJ (2007) Patterns and levels of hypoxia in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and their relationship to patient outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69(4):1024–1031. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.067
Lord EM, Harwell L, Koch CJ (1993) Detection of hypoxic cells by monoclonal antibody recognizing 2-nitroimidazole adducts. Cancer Res 53(23):5721–5726
Minchinton AI, Durand RE, Chaplin DJ (1990) Intermittent blood flow in the KHT sarcoma–flow cytometry studies using Hoechst 33342. Br J Cancer 62(2):195–200
Chia SK, Wykoff CC, Watson PH, Han C, Leek RD, Pastorek J, Gatter KC, Ratcliffe P, Harris AL (2001) Prognostic significance of a novel hypoxia-regulated marker, carbonic anhydrase IX, in invasive breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 19(16):3660–3668. doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.16.3660
Griffiths EA, Pritchard SA, McGrath SM, Valentine HR, Price PM, Welch IM, West CM (2007) Increasing expression of hypoxia-inducible proteins in the Barrett’s metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence. Br J Cancer 96(9):1377–1383. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603744
Griffiths EA, Pritchard SA, Valentine HR, Whitchelo N, Bishop PW, Ebert MP, Price PM, Welch IM, West CM (2007) Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression in the gastric carcinogenesis sequence and its prognostic role in gastric and gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas. Br J Cancer 96(1):95–103. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603524
Kon-no H, Ishii G, Nagai K, Yoshida J, Nishimura M, Nara M, Fujii T, Murata Y, Miyamoto H, Ochiai A (2006) Carbonic anhydrase IX expression is associated with tumor progression and a poor prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 54(3):409–418. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.08.017
Koukourakis MI, Bentzen SM, Giatromanolaki A, Wilson GD, Daley FM, Saunders MI, Dische S, Sivridis E, Harris AL (2006) Endogenous markers of two separate hypoxia response pathways (hypoxia inducible factor 2 alpha and carbonic anhydrase 9) are associated with radiotherapy failure in head and neck cancer patients recruited in the CHART randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 24(5):727–735. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.02.7474
Bache M, Kappler M, Said HM, Staab A, Vordermark D (2008) Detection and specific targeting of hypoxic regions within solid tumors: current preclinical and clinical strategies. Curr Med Chem 15(4):322–338
Baer S, Casaubon L, Schwartz MR, Marcogliese A, Younes M (2002) Glut3 expression in biopsy specimens of laryngeal carcinoma is associated with poor survival. Laryngoscope 112(2):393–396. doi:10.1097/00005537-200202000-00034
Mineta H, Miura K, Takebayashi S, Misawa K, Araki K, Misawa Y, Ueda Y (2002) Prognostic value of glucose transporter 1 expression in patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Anticancer Res 22(6B):3489–3494
Mineta H, Miura K, Ogino T, Takebayashi S, Misawa K, Ueda Y (2002) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression correlates with p53 and ki-67 expressions in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 22(2B):1039–1044
O’Connor JP, Boult JK, Jamin Y, Babur M, Finegan KG, Williams KJ, Little RA, Jackson A, Parker GJ, Reynolds AR, Waterton JC, Robinson SP (2016) Oxygen-enhanced MRI accurately identifies, quantifies, and maps tumor hypoxia in preclinical cancer models. Cancer Res 76(4):787–795. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2062
Mason RP, Shukla H, Antich PP (1993) In vivo oxygen tension and temperature: simultaneous determination using 19F NMR spectroscopy of perfluorocarbon. Magn Reson Med 29(3):296–302
Baldwin NJ, Ng TC (1996) Oxygenation and metabolic status of KHT tumors as measured simultaneously by 19F magnetic resonance imaging and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Imaging 14(5):541–551 (0730725X96000495 [pii])
Baldwin NJ, Wang Y, Ng TC (1996) In situ 19F MRS measurement of RIF-1 tumor blood volume: corroboration by radioisotope-labeled [125I]-albumin and correlation to tumor size. Magn Reson Imaging 14(3):275–280 (0730-725X(95)02080-D [pii])
Baudelet C, Gallez B (2002) How does blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) contrast correlate with oxygen partial pressure (pO2) inside tumors? Magn Reson Med 48(6):980–986. doi:10.1002/mrm.10318
Fleming IN, Manavaki R, Blower PJ, West C, Williams KJ, Harris AL, Domarkas J, Lord S, Baldry C, Gilbert FJ (2015) Imaging tumour hypoxia with positron emission tomography. Br J Cancer 112(2):238–250. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.610
Kim YR, Huang IJ, Lee SR, Tejima E, Mandeville JB, van Meer MP, Dai G, Choi YW, Dijkhuizen RM, Lo EH, Rosen BR (2005) Measurements of BOLD/CBV ratio show altered fMRI hemodynamics during stroke recovery in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 25(7):820–829. doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600084
Leontiev O, Buxton RB (2007) Reproducibility of BOLD, perfusion, and CMRO2 measurements with calibrated-BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 35(1):175–184. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.044
Padhani AR, Krohn KA, Lewis JS, Alber M (2007) Imaging oxygenation of human tumours. Eur Radiol 17(4):861–872. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0431-y
Rijpkema M, Kaanders JH, Joosten FB, van der Kogel AJ, Heerschap A (2002) Effects of breathing a hyperoxic hypercapnic gas mixture on blood oxygenation and vascularity of head-and-neck tumors as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53(5):1185–1191 (S0360301602028250 [pii])
Jiang L, Weatherall PT, McColl RW, Tripathy D, Mason RP (2013) Blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prediction of breast cancer chemotherapy response: a pilot study. J Magn Reson Imaging 37(5):1083–1092. doi:10.1002/jmri.23891
Tarnawski R, Fowler J, Skladowski K, Swierniak A, Suwinski R, Maciejewski B, Wygoda A (2002) How fast is repopulation of tumor cells during the treatment gap? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54(1):229–236 (S036030160202936X [pii])
Tarnawski R, Sokol M, Pieniazek P, Maciejewski B, Walecki J, Miszczyk L, Krupska T (2002) 1H-MRS in vivo predicts the early treatment outcome of postoperative radiotherapy for malignant gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52(5):1271–1276 (S0360301601027699 [pii])
Colliez F, Gallez B, Jordan BF (2017) Assessing tumor oxygenation for predicting outcome in radiation oncology: a review of studies correlating tumor hypoxic status and outcome in the preclinical and clinical settings. Front Oncol 7:10. doi:10.3389/fonc.2017.00010
Chia K, Fleming IN, Blower PJ (2012) Hypoxia imaging with PET: which tracers and why? Nucl Med Commun 33(3):217–222. doi:10.1097/MNM.0b013e32834eacb7
Bussink J, van Herpen CM, Kaanders JH, Oyen WJ (2010) PET-CT for response assessment and treatment adaptation in head and neck cancer. Lancet Oncol 11(7):661–669. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70353-5
Chapman JD, Franko AJ, Sharplin J (1981) A marker for hypoxic cells in tumours with potential clinical applicability. Br J Cancer 43(4):546–550
Chapman JD (1979) Hypoxic sensitizers–implications for radiation therapy. N Engl J Med 301(26):1429–1432. doi:10.1056/NEJM197912273012606
Gronroos T, Minn H (2007) Imaging of tumour hypoxia using PET and 18F-labelled tracers: biology meets technology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34(10):1563–1565. doi:10.1007/s00259-007-0487-1
Yip C, Blower PJ, Goh V, Landau DB, Cook GJ (2015) Molecular imaging of hypoxia in non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42(6):956–976. doi:10.1007/s00259-015-3009-6
Postema EJ, McEwan AJ, Riauka TA, Kumar P, Richmond DA, Abrams DN, Wiebe LI (2009) Initial results of hypoxia imaging using 1-alpha-d: -(5-deoxy-5-[18F]-fluoroarabinofuranosyl)-2-nitroimidazole (18F-FAZA). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36(10):1565–1573. doi:10.1007/s00259-009-1154-5
Koch CJ, Scheuermann JS, Divgi C, Judy KD, Kachur AV, Freifelder R, Reddin JS, Karp J, Stubbs JB, Hahn SM, Driesbaugh J, Smith D, Prendergast S, Evans SM (2010) Biodistribution and dosimetry of (18)F-EF5 in cancer patients with preliminary comparison of (18)F-EF5 uptake versus EF5 binding in human glioblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(11):2048–2059. doi:10.1007/s00259-010-1517-y
van Loon J, Janssen MH, Ollers M, Aerts HJ, Dubois L, Hochstenbag M, Dingemans AM, Lalisang R, Brans B, Windhorst B, van Dongen GA, Kolb H, Zhang J, De Ruysscher D, Lambin P (2010) PET imaging of hypoxia using [18F]HX4: a phase I trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(9):1663–1668. doi:10.1007/s00259-010-1437-x
Lehtio K, Oikonen V, Gronroos T, Eskola O, Kalliokoski K, Bergman J, Solin O, Grenman R, Nuutila P, Minn H (2001) Imaging of blood flow and hypoxia in head and neck cancer: initial evaluation with [(15)O]H(2)O and [(18)F]fluoroerythronitroimidazole PET. J Nucl Med 42(11):1643–1652
Gronroos T, Eskola O, Lehtio K, Minn H, Marjamaki P, Bergman J, Haaparanta M, Forsback S, Solin O (2001) Pharmacokinetics of [18F]FETNIM: a potential marker for PET. J Nucl Med 42(9):1397–1404
Beppu T, Terasaki K, Sasaki T, Fujiwara S, Matsuura H, Ogasawara K, Sera K, Yamada N, Uesugi N, Sugai T, Kudo K, Sasaki M, Ehara S, Iwata R, Takai Y (2014) Standardized uptake value in high uptake area on positron emission tomography with 18F-FRP170 as a hypoxic cell tracer correlates with intratumoral oxygen pressure in glioblastoma. Mol Imaging Biol 16(1):127–135. doi:10.1007/s11307-013-0670-7
Fujibayashi Y, Taniuchi H, Yonekura Y, Ohtani H, Konishi J, Yokoyama A (1997) Copper-62-ATSM: a new hypoxia imaging agent with high membrane permeability and low redox potential. J Nucl Med 38(7):1155–1160
Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW, Mintun MA, Lewis JS, Siegel BA, Welch MJ (2003) Assessing tumor hypoxia in cervical cancer by positron emission tomography with 60Cu-ATSM: relationship to therapeutic response-a preliminary report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55(5):1233–1238 (S0360301602044772 [pii])
Aboagye EO, Kelson AB, Tracy M, Workman P (1998) Preclinical development and current status of the fluorinated 2-nitroimidazole hypoxia probe N-(2-hydroxy-3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)-2-(2-nitro-1-imidazolyl) acetamide (SR 4554, CRC 94/17): a non-invasive diagnostic probe for the measurement of tumor hypoxia by magnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging, and by positron emission tomography. Anticancer Drug Des 13(6):703–730
Lee CP, Payne GS, Oregioni A, Ruddle R, Tan S, Raynaud FI, Eaton D, Campbell MJ, Cross K, Halbert G, Tracy M, McNamara J, Seddon B, Leach MO, Workman P, Judson I (2009) A phase I study of the nitroimidazole hypoxia marker SR4554 using 19F magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Br J Cancer 101(11):1860–1868. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605425
Grierson JR, Link JM, Mathis CA, Rasey JS, Krohn KA (1989) A radiosynthesis of fluorine-18 fluoromisonidazole. J Nucl Med 30(3):343–350
Krohn KA, Link JM, Mason RP (2008) Molecular imaging of hypoxia. J Nucl Med 49(Suppl 2):129S–148S. doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.045914
Lee ST, Scott AM (2007) Hypoxia positron emission tomography imaging with 18f-fluoromisonidazole. Semin Nucl Med 37(6):451–461. doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2007.07.001
Aboagye EO, Lewis AD, Tracy M, Workman P (1997) Bioreductive metabolism of the novel fluorinated 2-nitroimidazole hypoxia probe N-(2-hydroxy-3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)-2-(2-nitroimidazolyl) acetamide (SR-4554). Biochem Pharmacol 54(11):1217–1224 (S0006-2952(97)00344-4 [pii])
Hunter FW, Young RJ, Shalev Z, Vellanki RN, Wang J, Gu Y, Joshi N, Sreebhavan S, Weinreb I, Goldstein DP, Moffat J, Ketela T, Brown KR, Koritzinsky M, Solomon B, Rischin D, Wilson WR, Wouters BG (2015) Identification of P450 oxidoreductase as a major determinant of sensitivity to hypoxia-activated prodrugs. Cancer Res 75(19):4211–4223. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1107
Prekeges JL, Rasey JS, Grunbaum Z, Krohn KH (1991) Reduction of fluoromisonidazole, a new imaging agent for hypoxia. Biochem Pharmacol 42(12):2387–2395
Jerabek PA, Patrick TB, Kilbourn MR, Dischino DD, Welch MJ (1986) Synthesis and biodistribution of 18F-labeled fluoronitroimidazoles: potential in vivo markers of hypoxic tissue. Int J Rad Appl Instrum A 37(7):599–605
McClelland RA (1990) Molecualr interactions and biological effects of the products of reduction of nitroimidazoles. NATO advanced research workshop on selective activation of drugs by redox processes. Plenum Press, Plattsburgh
Cheng X, Bayer C, Maftei CA, Astner ST, Vaupel P, Ziegler SI, Shi K (2014) Preclinical evaluation of parametric image reconstruction of [18F]FMISO PET: correlation with ex vivo immunohistochemistry. Phys Med Biol 59(2):347–362. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/59/2/347
Rasey JS, Koh WJ, Evans ML, Peterson LM, Lewellen TK, Graham MM, Krohn KA (1996) Quantifying regional hypoxia in human tumors with positron emission tomography of [18F]fluoromisonidazole: a pretherapy study of 37 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36(2):417–428 (S0360301696003252 [pii])
Troost EG, Laverman P, Philippens ME, Lok J, van der Kogel AJ, Oyen WJ, Boerman OC, Kaanders JH, Bussink J (2008) Correlation of [18F]FMISO autoradiography and pimonidazole [corrected] immunohistochemistry in human head and neck carcinoma xenografts. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35(10):1803–1811. doi:10.1007/s00259-008-0772-7
Gagel B, Reinartz P, Dimartino E, Zimny M, Pinkawa M, Maneschi P, Stanzel S, Hamacher K, Coenen HH, Westhofen M, Bull U, Eble MJ (2004) pO(2) Polarography versus positron emission tomography ([(18)F] fluoromisonidazole, [(18)F]-2-fluoro-2′-deoxyglucose). An appraisal of radiotherapeutically relevant hypoxia. Strahlenther Onkol 180(10):616–622. doi:10.1007/s00066-004-1229-y
Gagel B, Piroth M, Pinkawa M, Reinartz P, Zimny M, Kaiser HJ, Stanzel S, Asadpour B, Demirel C, Hamacher K, Coenen HH, Scholbach T, Maneschi P, DiMartino E, Eble MJ (2007) pO polarography, contrast enhanced color duplex sonography (CDS), [18F] fluoromisonidazole and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: validated methods for the evaluation of therapy-relevant tumor oxygenation or only bricks in the puzzle of tumor hypoxia? BMC Cancer 7:113. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-7-113
Hicks RJ, Rischin D, Fisher R, Binns D, Scott AM, Peters LJ (2005) Utility of FMISO PET in advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiation incorporating a hypoxia-targeting chemotherapy agent. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32(12):1384–1391. doi:10.1007/s00259-005-1880-2
Thorwarth D, Eschmann SM, Holzner F, Paulsen F, Alber M (2006) Combined uptake of [18F]FDG and [18F]FMISO correlates with radiation therapy outcome in head-and-neck cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 80(2):151–156. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2006.07.033
Zimny M, Gagel B, DiMartino E, Hamacher K, Coenen HH, Westhofen M, Eble M, Buell U, Reinartz P (2006) FDG–a marker of tumour hypoxia? A comparison with [18F]fluoromisonidazole and pO2-polarography in metastatic head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33(12):1426–1431. doi:10.1007/s00259-006-0175-6
Mortensen LS, Buus S, Nordsmark M, Bentzen L, Munk OL, Keiding S, Overgaard J (2010) Identifying hypoxia in human tumors: a correlation study between 18F-FMISO PET and the Eppendorf oxygen-sensitive electrode. Acta Oncol 49(7):934–940. doi:10.3109/0284186X.2010.516274
Abolmaali N, Haase R, Koch A, Zips D, Steinbach J, Baumann M, Kotzerke J, Zophel K (2011) Two or four hour [(1)(8)F]FMISO-PET in HNSCC. When is the contrast best? Nuklearmedizin 50(1):22–27. doi:10.3413/nukmed-00328-10-07
Sato J, Kitagawa Y, Yamazaki Y, Hata H, Okamoto S, Shiga T, Shindoh M, Kuge Y, Tamaki N (2013) 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET uptake is correlated with hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Nucl Med 54(7):1060–1065. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.114355
Hatano T, Zhao S, Zhao Y, Nishijima K, Kuno N, Hanzawa H, Sakamoto T, Tamaki N, Kuge Y (2013) Biological characteristics of intratumoral [F-18]fluoromisonidazole distribution in a rodent model of glioma. Int J Oncol 42(3):823–830. doi:10.3892/ijo.2013.1781
Valk PE, Mathis CA, Prados MD, Gilbert JC, Budinger TF (1992) Hypoxia in human gliomas: demonstration by PET with fluorine-18-fluoromisonidazole. J Nucl Med 33(12):2133–2137
Bruehlmeier M, Roelcke U, Schubiger PA, Ametamey SM (2004) Assessment of hypoxia and perfusion in human brain tumors using PET with 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 15O-H2O. J Nucl Med 45(11):1851–1859 (45/11/1851 [pii])
Rajendran JG, Mankoff DA, O’Sullivan F, Peterson LM, Schwartz DL, Conrad EU, Spence AM, Muzi M, Farwell DG, Krohn KA (2004) Hypoxia and glucose metabolism in malignant tumors: evaluation by [18F]fluoromisonidazole and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging. Clin Cancer Res 10(7):2245–2252
Cher LM, Murone C, Lawrentschuk N, Ramdave S, Papenfuss A, Hannah A, O’Keefe GJ, Sachinidis JI, Berlangieri SU, Fabinyi G, Scott AM (2006) Correlation of hypoxic cell fraction and angiogenesis with glucose metabolic rate in gliomas using 18F-fluoromisonidazole, 18F-FDG PET, and immunohistochemical studies. J Nucl Med 47(3):410–418 (47/3/410 [pii])
Swanson KR, Chakraborty G, Wang CH, Rockne R, Harpold HL, Muzi M, Adamsen TC, Krohn KA, Spence AM (2009) Complementary but distinct roles for MRI and 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET in the assessment of human glioblastomas. J Nucl Med 50(1):36–44. doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.055467
Oehler C, O’Donoghue JA, Russell J, Zanzonico P, Lorenzen S, Ling CC, Carlin S (2011) 18F-fluromisonidazole PET imaging as a biomarker for the response to 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid in colorectal xenograft tumors. J Nucl Med 52(3):437–444. doi:10.2967/jnumed.110.081372
Cheng J, Lei L, Xu J, Sun Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, Pan L, Shao Z, Liu G (2013) 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET/CT: a potential tool for predicting primary endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer. J Nucl Med 54(3):333–340. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.111963
Cherk MH, Foo SS, Poon AM, Knight SR, Murone C, Papenfuss AT, Sachinidis JI, Saunder TH, O’Keefe GJ, Scott AM (2006) Lack of correlation of hypoxic cell fraction and angiogenesis with glucose metabolic rate in non-small cell lung cancer assessed by 18F-Fluoromisonidazole and 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 47(12):1921–1926 (47/12/1921 [pii])
Vera P, Bohn P, Edet-Sanson A, Salles A, Hapdey S, Gardin I, Menard JF, Modzelewski R, Thiberville L, Dubray B (2011) Simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET) assessment of metabolism with (1)(8)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG), proliferation with (1)(8)F-fluoro-thymidine (FLT), and hypoxia with (1)(8)fluoro-misonidazole (F-miso) before and during radiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a pilot study. Radiother Oncol 98(1):109–116. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.10.011
Murakami M, Zhao S, Zhao Y, Chowdhury NF, Yu W, Nishijima K, Takiguchi M, Tamaki N, Kuge Y (2012) Evaluation of changes in the tumor microenvironment after sorafenib therapy by sequential histology and 18F-fluoromisonidazole hypoxia imaging in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol 41(5):1593–1600. doi:10.3892/ijo.2012.1624
Hugonnet F, Fournier L, Medioni J, Smadja C, Hindie E, Huchet V, Itti E, Cuenod CA, Chatellier G, Oudard S, Faraggi M (2011) Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: relationship between initial metastasis hypoxia, change after 1 month’s sunitinib, and therapeutic response: an 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET/CT study. J Nucl Med 52(7):1048–1055. doi:10.2967/jnumed.110.084517
Piert M (2009) Hypoxia imaging. Principles and practice of PET and PET/CT. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia
Ballinger JR (2001) Imaging hypoxia in tumors. Semin Nucl Med 31(4):321–329
Lopci E, Grassi I, Chiti A, Nanni C, Cicoria G, Toschi L, Fonti C, Lodi F, Mattioli S, Fanti S (2014) PET radiopharmaceuticals for imaging of tumor hypoxia: a review of the evidence. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 4(4):365–384
Horsman MR, Mortensen LS, Petersen JB, Busk M, Overgaard J (2012) Imaging hypoxia to improve radiotherapy outcome. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 9(12):674–687. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.171
Barthel H, Wilson H, Collingridge DR, Brown G, Osman S, Luthra SK, Brady F, Workman P, Price PM, Aboagye EO (2004) In vivo evaluation of [18F]fluoroetanidazole as a new marker for imaging tumour hypoxia with positron emission tomography. Br J Cancer 90(11):2232–2242. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601862
Bollineni VR, Kerner GS, Pruim J, Steenbakkers RJ, Wiegman EM, Koole MJ, de Groot EH, Willemsen AT, Luurtsema G, Widder J, Groen HJ, Langendijk JA (2013) PET imaging of tumor hypoxia using 18F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside in stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients. J Nucl Med 54(8):1175–1180. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.115014
Trinkaus ME, Blum R, Rischin D, Callahan J, Bressel M, Segard T, Roselt P, Eu P, Binns D, MacManus MP, Ball D, Hicks RJ (2013) Imaging of hypoxia with 18F-FAZA PET in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 57(4):475–481. doi:10.1111/1754-9485.12086
Grosu AL, Souvatzoglou M, Roper B, Dobritz M, Wiedenmann N, Jacob V, Wester HJ, Reischl G, Machulla HJ, Schwaiger M, Molls M, Piert M (2007) Hypoxia imaging with FAZA-PET and theoretical considerations with regard to dose painting for individualization of radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69(2):541–551. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.079
Mortensen LS, Johansen J, Kallehauge J, Primdahl H, Busk M, Lassen P, Alsner J, Sorensen BS, Toustrup K, Jakobsen S, Petersen J, Petersen H, Theil J, Nordsmark M, Overgaard J (2012) FAZA PET/CT hypoxia imaging in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy: results from the DAHANCA 24 trial. Radiother Oncol 105(1):14–20. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2012.09.015
Souvatzoglou M, Grosu AL, Roper B, Krause BJ, Beck R, Reischl G, Picchio M, Machulla HJ, Wester HJ, Piert M (2007) Tumour hypoxia imaging with [18F]FAZA PET in head and neck cancer patients: a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34(10):1566–1575. doi:10.1007/s00259-007-0424-3
Schuetz M, Schmid MP, Potter R, Kommata S, Georg D, Lukic D, Dudczak R, Kletter K, Dimopoulos J, Karanikas G, Bachtiary B (2010) Evaluating repetitive 18F-fluoroazomycin-arabinoside (18FAZA) PET in the setting of MRI guided adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer. Acta Oncol 49(7):941–947. doi:10.3109/0284186X.2010.510145
Havelund BM, Holdgaard PC, Rafaelsen SR, Mortensen LS, Theil J, Bender D, Ploen J, Spindler KL, Jakobsen A (2013) Tumour hypoxia imaging with 18F-fluoroazomycinarabinofuranoside PET/CT in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Nucl Med Commun 34(2):155–161. doi:10.1097/MNM.0b013e32835bd5bc
Dolbier WR Jr, Li AR, Koch CJ, Shiue CY, Kachur AV (2001) [18F]-EF5, a marker for PET detection of hypoxia: synthesis of precursor and a new fluorination procedure. Appl Radiat Isot 54(1):73–80 (S0969804300001020 [pii])
Dubois L, Landuyt W, Haustermans K, Dupont P, Bormans G, Vermaelen P, Flamen P, Verbeken E, Mortelmans L (2004) Evaluation of hypoxia in an experimental rat tumour model by [(18)F]fluoromisonidazole PET and immunohistochemistry. Br J Cancer 91(11):1947–1954. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602219
Chen L, Zhang Z, Kolb HC, Walsh JC, Zhang J, Guan Y (2012) (1)(8)F-HX4 hypoxia imaging with PET/CT in head and neck cancer: a comparison with (1)(8)F-FMISO. Nucl Med Commun 33(10):1096–1102. doi:10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283571016
Zegers CM, van Elmpt W, Wierts R, Reymen B, Sharifi H, Ollers MC, Hoebers F, Troost EG, Wanders R, van Baardwijk A, Brans B, Eriksson J, Windhorst B, Mottaghy FM, De Ruysscher D, Lambin P (2013) Hypoxia imaging with [(1)(8)F]HX4 PET in NSCLC patients: defining optimal imaging parameters. Radiother Oncol 109(1):58–64. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.031
Lehtio K, Eskola O, Viljanen T, Oikonen V, Gronroos T, Sillanmaki L, Grenman R, Minn H (2004) Imaging perfusion and hypoxia with PET to predict radiotherapy response in head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59(4):971–982. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.12.014
Lehtio K, Oikonen V, Nyman S, Gronroos T, Roivainen A, Eskola O, Minn H (2003) Quantifying tumour hypoxia with fluorine-18 fluoroerythronitroimidazole ([18F]FETNIM) and PET using the tumour to plasma ratio. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30(1):101–108. doi:10.1007/s00259-002-1016-x
Li L, Hu M, Zhu H, Zhao W, Yang G, Yu J (2010) Comparison of 18F-Fluoroerythronitroimidazole and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and prognostic value in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 11(5):335–340. doi:10.3816/CLC.2010.n.042
Hu M, Xing L, Mu D, Yang W, Yang G, Kong L, Yu J (2013) Hypoxia imaging with 18F-fluoroerythronitroimidazole integrated PET/CT and immunohistochemical studies in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Nucl Med 38(8):591–596. doi:10.1097/RLU.0b013e318279fd3d
Vercellino L, Groheux D, Thoury A, Delord M, Schlageter MH, Delpech Y, Barre E, Baruch-Hennequin V, Tylski P, Homyrda L, Walker F, Barranger E, Hindie E (2012) Hypoxia imaging of uterine cervix carcinoma with (18)F-FETNIM PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 37(11):1065–1068. doi:10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182638e7e
Yue J, Yang Y, Cabrera AR, Sun X, Zhao S, Xie P, Zheng J, Ma L, Fu Z, Yu J (2012) Measuring tumor hypoxia with (1)(8)F-FETNIM PET in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot clinical study. Dis Esophagus 25(1):54–61. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01209.x
Shibahara I, Kumabe T, Kanamori M, Saito R, Sonoda Y, Watanabe M, Iwata R, Higano S, Takanami K, Takai Y, Tominaga T (2010) Imaging of hypoxic lesions in patients with gliomas by using positron emission tomography with 1-(2-[18F] fluoro-1-[hydroxymethyl]ethoxy)methyl-2-nitroimidazole, a new 18F-labeled 2-nitroimidazole analog. J Neurosurg 113(2):358–368. doi:10.3171/2009.10.JNS09510
Kaneta T, Takai Y, Iwata R, Hakamatsuka T, Yasuda H, Nakayama K, Ishikawa Y, Watanuki S, Furumoto S, Funaki Y, Nakata E, Jingu K, Tsujitani M, Ito M, Fukuda H, Takahashi S, Yamada S (2007) Initial evaluation of dynamic human imaging using 18F-FRP170 as a new PET tracer for imaging hypoxia. Ann Nucl Med 21(2):101–107
Obata A, Yoshimi E, Waki A, Lewis JS, Oyama N, Welch MJ, Saji H, Yonekura Y, Fujibayashi Y (2001) Retention mechanism of hypoxia selective nuclear imaging/radiotherapeutic agent cu-diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) (Cu-ATSM) in tumor cells. Ann Nucl Med 15(6):499–504
Dearling JL, Packard AB (2010) Some thoughts on the mechanism of cellular trapping of Cu(II)-ATSM. Nucl Med Biol 37(3):237–243. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.11.004
O’Donoghue JA, Zanzonico P, Pugachev A, Wen B, Smith-Jones P, Cai S, Burnazi E, Finn RD, Burgman P, Ruan S, Lewis JS, Welch MJ, Ling CC, Humm JL (2005) Assessment of regional tumor hypoxia using 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 64Cu(II)-diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) positron emission tomography: comparative study featuring microPET imaging, Po2 probe measurement, autoradiography, and fluorescent microscopy in the R3327-AT and FaDu rat tumor models. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61(5):1493–1502. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.057
Holland JP, Lewis JS, Dehdashti F (2009) Assessing tumor hypoxia by positron emission tomography with Cu-ATSM. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 53(2):193–200
Carlin S, Zhang H, Reese M, Ramos NN, Chen Q, Ricketts SA (2014) A comparison of the imaging characteristics and microregional distribution of 4 hypoxia PET tracers. J Nucl Med 55(3):515–521. doi:10.2967/jnumed.113.126615
Hueting R, Kersemans V, Cornelissen B, Tredwell M, Hussien K, Christlieb M, Gee AD, Passchier J, Smart SC, Dilworth JR, Gouverneur V, Muschel RJ (2014) A comparison of the behavior of (64)Cu-acetate and (64)Cu-ATSM in vitro and in vivo. J Nucl Med 55(1):128–134. doi:10.2967/jnumed.113.119917
Tateishi K, Tateishi U, Sato M, Yamanaka S, Kanno H, Murata H, Inoue T, Kawahara N (2013) Application of 62Cu-diacetyl-bis (N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) PET imaging to predict highly malignant tumor grades and hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression in patients with glioma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34(1):92–99. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3159
Tran LB, Bol A, Labar D, Jordan B, Magat J, Mignion L, Gregoire V, Gallez B (2012) Hypoxia imaging with the nitroimidazole 18F-FAZA PET tracer: a comparison with OxyLite, EPR oximetry and 19F-MRI relaxometry. Radiother Oncol 105(1):29–35. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2012.04.011
Valable S, Corroyer-Dulmont A, Chakhoyan A, Durand L, Toutain J, Divoux D, Barre L, MacKenzie ET, Petit E, Bernaudin M, Touzani O, Barbier EL (2016) Imaging of brain oxygenation with magnetic resonance imaging: A validation with positron emission tomography in the healthy and tumoural brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 271678X16671965. doi:10.1177/0271678X16671965
Simoncic U, Leibfarth S, Welz S, Schwenzer N, Schmidt H, Reischl G, Pfannenberg C, la Fougere C, Nikolaou K, Zips D, Thorwarth D (2017) Comparison of DCE-MRI kinetic parameters and FMISO-PET uptake parameters in head and neck cancer patients. Med Phys. doi:10.1002/mp.12228
Ali R, Apte S, Vilalta M, Subbarayan M, Miao Z, Chin FT, Graves EE (2015) 18F-EF5 PET is predictive of response to fractionated radiotherapy in preclinical tumor models. PLoS One 10(10):e0139425. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139425
Burgman P, O’Donoghue JA, Lewis JS, Welch MJ, Humm JL, Ling CC (2005) Cell line-dependent differences in uptake and retention of the hypoxia-selective nuclear imaging agent Cu-ATSM. Nucl Med Biol 32(6):623–630. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.05.003
Chang E, Liu H, Unterschemmann K, Ellinghaus P, Liu S, Gekeler V, Cheng Z, Berndorff D, Gambhir SS (2015) 18F-FAZA PET imaging response tracks the reoxygenation of tumors in mice upon treatment with the mitochondrial complex I inhibitor BAY 87-2243. Clin Cancer Res 21(2):335–346. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0217
Chapman DW, Jans HS, Ma I, Mercer JR, Wiebe LI, Wuest M, Moore RB (2014) Detecting functional changes with [(18)F]FAZA in a renal cell carcinoma mouse model following sunitinib therapy. EJNMMI Res 4(1):27. doi:10.1186/s13550-014-0027-5
Chitneni SK, Bida GT, Yuan H, Palmer GM, Hay MP, Melcher T, Wilson WR, Zalutsky MR, Dewhirst MW (2013) 18F-EF5 PET imaging as an early response biomarker for the hypoxia-activated prodrug SN30000 combined with radiation treatment in a non-small cell lung cancer xenograft model. J Nucl Med 54(8):1339–1346. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.116293
Chitneni SK, Bida GT, Zalutsky MR, Dewhirst MW (2014) Comparison of the hypoxia PET tracer (18)F-EF5 to immunohistochemical marker EF5 in 3 different human tumor xenograft models. J Nucl Med 55(7):1192–1197. doi:10.2967/jnumed.114.137448
Dence CS, Ponde DE, Welch MJ, Lewis JS (2008) Autoradiographic and small-animal PET comparisons between (18)F-FMISO, (18)F-FDG, (18)F-FLT and the hypoxic selective (64)Cu-ATSM in a rodent model of cancer. Nucl Med Biol 35(6):713–720. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2008.06.001
Dubois LJ, Lieuwes NG, Janssen MH, Peeters WJ, Windhorst AD, Walsh JC, Kolb HC, Ollers MC, Bussink J, van Dongen GA, van der Kogel A, Lambin P (2011) Preclinical evaluation and validation of [18F]HX4, a promising hypoxia marker for PET imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(35):14620–14625. doi:10.1073/pnas.1102526108
Gronroos T, Bentzen L, Marjamaki P, Murata R, Horsman MR, Keiding S, Eskola O, Haaparanta M, Minn H, Solin O (2004) Comparison of the biodistribution of two hypoxia markers [18F]FETNIM and [18F]FMISO in an experimental mammary carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31(4):513–520. doi:10.1007/s00259-003-1404-x
Ko YH, Pedersen PL, Geschwind JF (2001) Glucose catabolism in the rabbit VX2 tumor model for liver cancer: characterization and targeting hexokinase. Cancer Lett 173(1):83–91 (S030438350100667X [pii])
Lewis JS, McCarthy DW, McCarthy TJ, Fujibayashi Y, Welch MJ (1999) Evaluation of 64Cu-ATSM in vitro and in vivo in a hypoxic tumor model. J Nucl Med 40(1):177–183
Martin GV, Caldwell JH, Graham MM, Grierson JR, Kroll K, Cowan MJ, Lewellen TK, Rasey JS, Casciari JJ, Krohn KA (1992) Noninvasive detection of hypoxic myocardium using fluorine-18-fluoromisonidazole and positron emission tomography. J Nucl Med 33(12):2202–2208
Martin GV, Cerqueira MD, Caldwell JH, Rasey JS, Embree L, Krohn KA (1990) Fluoromisonidazole. A metabolic marker of myocyte hypoxia. Circ Res 67(1):240–244
Matsumoto K, Szajek L, Krishna MC, Cook JA, Seidel J, Grimes K, Carson J, Sowers AL, English S, Green MV, Bacharach SL, Eckelman WC, Mitchell JB (2007) The influence of tumor oxygenation on hypoxia imaging in murine squamous cell carcinoma using [64Cu]Cu-ATSM or [18F]Fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography. Int J Oncol 30(4):873–881
McCall KC, Humm JL, Bartlett R, Reese M, Carlin S (2012) Copper-64-diacetyl-bis(N(4)-methylthiosemicarbazone) pharmacokinetics in FaDu xenograft tumors and correlation with microscopic markers of hypoxia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84(3):e393–e399. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.05.005
McQuade P, Martin KE, Castle TC, Went MJ, Blower PJ, Welch MJ, Lewis JS (2005) Investigation into 64Cu-labeled Bis(selenosemicarbazone) and Bis(thiosemicarbazone) complexes as hypoxia imaging agents. Nucl Med Biol 32(2):147–156. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2004.10.004
Obata A, Yoshimoto M, Kasamatsu S, Naiki H, Takamatsu S, Kashikura K, Furukawa T, Lewis JS, Welch MJ, Saji H, Yonekura Y, Fujibayashi Y (2003) Intra-tumoral distribution of (64)Cu-ATSM: a comparison study with FDG. Nucl Med Biol 30(5):529–534 (S0969805103000477 [pii])
Peeters SG, Zegers CM, Biemans R, Lieuwes NG, van Stiphout RG, Yaromina A, Sun JD, Hart CP, Windhorst AD, van Elmpt W, Dubois LJ, Lambin P (2015) TH-302 in combination with radiotherapy enhances the therapeutic outcome and is associated with pretreatment [18F]HX4 hypoxia PET imaging. Clin Cancer Res 21(13):2984–2992. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0018
Peeters SG, Zegers CM, Lieuwes NG, van Elmpt W, Eriksson J, van Dongen GA, Dubois L, Lambin P (2015) A comparative study of the hypoxia PET tracers [(1)(8)F]HX4, [(1)(8)F]FAZA, and [(1)(8)F]FMISO in a preclinical tumor model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91(2):351–359. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.045
Piert M, Machulla HJ, Picchio M, Reischl G, Ziegler S, Kumar P, Wester HJ, Beck R, McEwan AJ, Wiebe LI, Schwaiger M (2005) Hypoxia-specific tumor imaging with 18F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside. J Nucl Med 46(1):106–113 (46/1/106 [pii])
Rasey JS, Grunbaum Z, Krohn K, Nelson N, Chin L (1985) Comparison of binding of [3H]misonidazole and [14C]misonidazole in multicell spheroids. Radiat Res 101(3):473–479
Silvoniemi A, Silen J, Forsback S, Loyttyniemi E, Schrey AR, Solin O, Grenman R, Minn H, Gronroos TJ (2014) Evaluation of repeated [(18)F]EF5 PET/CT scans and tumor growth rate in experimental head and neck carcinomas. EJNMMI Res 4:65. doi:10.1186/s13550-014-0065-z
Sorger D, Patt M, Kumar P, Wiebe LI, Barthel H, Seese A, Dannenberg C, Tannapfel A, Kluge R, Sabri O (2003) [18F]Fluoroazomycinarabinofuranoside (18FAZA) and [18F]Fluoromisonidazole (18FMISO): a comparative study of their selective uptake in hypoxic cells and PET imaging in experimental rat tumors. Nucl Med Biol 30(3):317–326 (S0969805102004420 [pii])
Troost EG, Laverman P, Kaanders JH, Philippens M, Lok J, Oyen WJ, van der Kogel AJ, Boerman OC, Bussink J (2006) Imaging hypoxia after oxygenation-modification: comparing [18F]FMISO autoradiography with pimonidazole immunohistochemistry in human xenograft tumors. Radiother Oncol 80(2):157–164. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2006.07.023
Valtorta S, Belloli S, Sanvito F, Masiello V, Di Grigoli G, Monterisi C, Fazio F, Picchio M, Moresco RM (2013) Comparison of 18F-fluoroazomycin-arabinofuranoside and 64Cu-diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) in preclinical models of cancer. J Nucl Med 54(7):1106–1112. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.111120
Yuan H, Schroeder T, Bowsher JE, Hedlund LW, Wong T, Dewhirst MW (2006) Intertumoral differences in hypoxia selectivity of the PET imaging agent 64Cu(II)-diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone). J Nucl Med 47(6):989–998 (47/6/989 [pii])
Schutze C, Bergmann R, Bruchner K, Mosch B, Yaromina A, Zips D, Hessel F, Krause M, Thames H, Kotzerke J, Steinbach J, Baumann M, Beuthien-Baumann B (2014) Effect of [(18)F]FMISO stratified dose-escalation on local control in FaDu hSCC in nude mice. Radiother Oncol 111(1):81–87. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2014.02.005
Bentzen L, Keiding S, Nordsmark M, Falborg L, Hansen SB, Keller J, Nielsen OS, Overgaard J (2003) Tumour oxygenation assessed by 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET and polarographic needle electrodes in human soft tissue tumours. Radiother Oncol 67(3):339–344 (S0167814003000811 [pii])
Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW, Lewis JS, Laforest R, Siegel BA, Welch MJ (2008) Assessing tumor hypoxia in cervical cancer by PET with 60Cu-labeled diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone). J Nucl Med 49(2):201–205. doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.048520
Francis RJ, Segard T, Morandeau L, Lee YC, Millward MJ, Segal A, Nowak AK (2015) Characterization of hypoxia in malignant pleural mesothelioma with FMISO PET-CT. Lung Cancer 90(1):55–60. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.07.015
Garcia-Parra R, Wood D, Shah RB, Siddiqui J, Hussain H, Park H, Desmond T, Meyer C, Piert M (2011) Investigation on tumor hypoxia in resectable primary prostate cancer as demonstrated by 18F-FAZA PET/CT utilizing multimodality fusion techniques. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38(10):1816–1823. doi:10.1007/s00259-011-1876-z
Gronroos TJ, Lehtio K, Soderstrom KO, Kronqvist P, Laine J, Eskola O, Viljanen T, Grenman R, Solin O, Minn H (2014) Hypoxia, blood flow and metabolism in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: correlations between multiple immunohistochemical parameters and PET. BMC Cancer 14:876. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-876
Hino-Shishikura A, Tateishi U, Shibata H, Yoneyama T, Nishii T, Torii I, Tateishi K, Ohtake M, Kawahara N, Inoue T (2014) Tumor hypoxia and microscopic diffusion capacity in brain tumors: a comparison of (62)Cu-Diacetyl-Bis (N4-Methylthiosemicarbazone) PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41(7):1419–1427. doi:10.1007/s00259-014-2714-x
Jansen JF, Schoder H, Lee NY, Wang Y, Pfister DG, Fury MG, Stambuk HE, Humm JL, Koutcher JA, Shukla-Dave A (2010) Noninvasive assessment of tumor microenvironment using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography imaging in neck nodal metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77(5):1403–1410. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.009
Komar G, Lehtio K, Seppanen M, Eskola O, Levola H, Lindholm P, Sipila H, Seppala J, Grenman R, Solin O, Minn H (2014) Prognostic value of tumour blood flow, [(1)(8)F]EF5 and [(1)(8)F]FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiochemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41(11):2042–2050. doi:10.1007/s00259-014-2818-3
Lawrentschuk N (2015) Imaging in prostate cancer with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and gallium positron emission tomography-computed tomography: the real deal? BJU Int 115(Suppl 5):1–2. doi:10.1111/bju.13094
Lewin J, Khamly KK, Young RJ, Mitchell C, Hicks RJ, Toner GC, Ngan SY, Chander S, Powell GJ, Herschtal A, Te Marvelde L, Desai J, Choong PF, Stacker SA, Achen MG, Ferris N, Fox S, Slavin J, Thomas DM (2014) A phase Ib/II translational study of sunitinib with neoadjuvant radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma. Br J Cancer 111(12):2254–2261. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.537
Lewis JS, Laforest R, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW, Welch MJ, Siegel BA (2008) An imaging comparison of 64Cu-ATSM and 60Cu-ATSM in cancer of the uterine cervix. J Nucl Med 49(7):1177–1182. doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.051326
Lin LL, Pryma D, Koch C, Evans S (2013) A pilot study of F18 EF5 PET/CT imaging in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. Pract Radiat Oncol 3(2 Suppl 1):S26–S27. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2013.01.092
Lohith TG, Kudo T, Demura Y, Umeda Y, Kiyono Y, Fujibayashi Y, Okazawa H (2009) Pathophysiologic correlation between 62Cu-ATSM and 18F-FDG in lung cancer. J Nucl Med 50(12):1948–1953. doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.069021
Maity A, Lin A (2014) Using [18F]EF5 PET to measure hypoxia modulation by Nelfinavir in larynx cancer. National Institute of Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Nascente CM, Dhani NC, Vines D (2013) Clinical characterization of hypoxia in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by 18F-FAZA PET and pimonidazole. J Clin Oncol 31 (suppl; abstr 4049)
Nehmeh SA, Lee NY, Schroder H, Squire O, Zanzonico PB, Erdi YE, Greco C, Mageras G, Pham HS, Larson SM, Ling CC, Humm JL (2008) Reproducibility of intratumor distribution of (18)F-fluoromisonidazole in head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70(1):235–242. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.036
Okamoto S, Shiga T, Yasuda K, Ito YM, Magota K, Kasai K, Kuge Y, Shirato H, Tamaki N (2013) High reproducibility of tumor hypoxia evaluated by 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET for head and neck cancer. J Nucl Med 54(2):201–207. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.109330
Rajendran JG, Hendrickson KR, Spence AM, Muzi M, Krohn KA, Mankoff DA (2006) Hypoxia imaging-directed radiation treatment planning. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33(Suppl 1):44–53. doi:10.1007/s00259-006-0135-1
Rajendran JG, Wilson DC, Conrad EU, Peterson LM, Bruckner JD, Rasey JS, Chin LK, Hofstrand PD, Grierson JR, Eary JF, Krohn KA (2003) [(18)F]FMISO and [(18)F]FDG PET imaging in soft tissue sarcomas: correlation of hypoxia, metabolism and VEGF expression. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30(5):695–704. doi:10.1007/s00259-002-1096-7
Roels S, Slagmolen P, Nuyts J, Lee JA, Loeckx D, Maes F, Stroobants S, Penninckx F, Haustermans K (2008) Biological image-guided radiotherapy in rectal cancer: is there a role for FMISO or FLT, next to FDG? Acta Oncol 47(7):1237–1248. doi:10.1080/02841860802256434
Sato J, Kitagawa Y, Yamazaki Y, Hata H, Asaka T, Miyakoshi M, Okamoto S, Shiga T, Shindoh M, Kuge Y, Tamaki N (2014) Advantage of FMISO-PET over FDG-PET for predicting histological response to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41(11):2031–2041. doi:10.1007/s00259-014-2810-y
Segard T, Robins PD, Yusoff IF, Ee H, Morandeau L, Campbell EM, Francis RJ (2013) Detection of hypoxia with 18F-fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) PET/CT in suspected or proven pancreatic cancer. Clin Nucl Med 38(1):1–6. doi:10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182708777
Servagi-Vernat S, Differding S, Hanin FX, Labar D, Bol A, Lee JA, Gregoire V (2014) A prospective clinical study of (1)(8)F-FAZA PET-CT hypoxia imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma before and during radiation therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41(8):1544–1552. doi:10.1007/s00259-014-2730-x
Tachibana I, Nishimura Y, Shibata T, Kanamori S, Nakamatsu K, Koike R, Nishikawa T, Ishikawa K, Tamura M, Hosono M (2013) A prospective clinical trial of tumor hypoxia imaging with 18F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography and computed tomography (F-MISO PET/CT) before and during radiation therapy. J Radiat Res 54(6):1078–1084. doi:10.1093/jrr/rrt033
Thorwarth D, Eschmann SM, Scheiderbauer J, Paulsen F, Alber M (2005) Kinetic analysis of dynamic 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET correlates with radiation treatment outcome in head-and-neck cancer. BMC Cancer 5:152. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-5-152
Thureau S, Chaumet-Riffaud P, Modzelewski R, Fernandez P, Tessonnier L, Vervueren L, Cachin F, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Olivier P, Kolesnikov-Gauthier H, Blagosklonov O, Bridji B, Devillers A, Collombier L, Courbon F, Gremillet E, Houzard C, Caignon JM, Roux J, Aide N, Brenot-Rossi I, Doyeux K, Dubray B, Vera P (2013) Interobserver agreement of qualitative analysis and tumor delineation of 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine PET images in lung cancer. J Nucl Med 54(9):1543–1550. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.118083
Zegers CM, van Elmpt W, Reymen B, Even AJ, Troost EG, Ollers MC, Hoebers FJ, Houben RM, Eriksson J, Windhorst AD, Mottaghy FM, De Ruysscher D, Lambin P (2014) In vivo quantification of hypoxic and metabolic status of NSCLC tumors using [18F]HX4 and [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging. Clin Cancer Res 20(24):6389–6397. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1524
Zips D, Zophel K, Abolmaali N, Perrin R, Abramyuk A, Haase R, Appold S, Steinbach J, Kotzerke J, Baumann M (2012) Exploratory prospective trial of hypoxia-specific PET imaging during radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 105(1):21–28. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.019
Rajendran JG, Schwartz DL, O’Sullivan J, Peterson LM, Ng P, Scharnhorst J, Grierson JR, Krohn KA (2006) Tumor hypoxia imaging with [F-18] fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12(18):5435–5441. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1773
Rischin D, Hicks RJ, Fisher R, Binns D, Corry J, Porceddu S, Peters LJ (2006) Prognostic significance of [18F]-misonidazole positron emission tomography-detected tumor hypoxia in patients with advanced head and neck cancer randomly assigned to chemoradiation with or without tirapazamine: a substudy of Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study 98.02. J Clin Oncol 24(13):2098–2104. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2878
Eschmann SM, Paulsen F, Bedeshem C, Machulla HJ, Hehr T, Bamberg M, Bares R (2007) Hypoxia-imaging with (18)F-Misonidazole and PET: changes of kinetics during radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 83(3):406–410. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2007.05.014
Lee NY, Mechalakos JG, Nehmeh S, Lin Z, Squire OD, Cai S, Chan K, Zanzonico PB, Greco C, Ling CC, Humm JL, Schoder H (2008) Fluorine-18-labeled fluoromisonidazole positron emission and computed tomography-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70(1):2–13. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.039
Dirix P, Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Stroobants S, Hermans R, Nuyts S (2009) Dose painting in radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of repeated functional imaging with (18)F-FDG PET, (18)F-fluoromisonidazole PET, diffusion-weighted MRI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Nucl Med 50(7):1020–1027. doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.062638
Lee N, Nehmeh S, Schoder H, Fury M, Chan K, Ling CC, Humm J (2009) Prospective trial incorporating pre-/mid-treatment [18F]-misonidazole positron emission tomography for head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75(1):101–108. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.049
Kikuchi M, Yamane T, Shinohara S, Fujiwara K, Hori SY, Tona Y, Yamazaki H, Naito Y, Senda M (2011) 18F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography before treatment is a predictor of radiotherapy outcome and survival prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Nucl Med 25(9):625–633. doi:10.1007/s12149-011-0508-9
Yamane T, Kikuchi M, Shinohara S, Senda M (2011) Reduction of [(18)F]fluoromisonidazole uptake after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Imaging Biol 13(2):227–231. doi:10.1007/s11307-010-0365-2
Chao KS, Bosch WR, Mutic S, Lewis JS, Dehdashti F, Mintun MA, Dempsey JF, Perez CA, Purdy JA, Welch MJ (2001) A novel approach to overcome hypoxic tumor resistance: Cu-ATSM-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49(4):1171–1182 (S0360-3016(00)01433-4 [pii])
Minagawa Y, Shizukuishi K, Koike I, Horiuchi C, Watanuki K, Hata M, Omura M, Odagiri K, Tohnai I, Inoue T, Tateishi U (2011) Assessment of tumor hypoxia by 62Cu-ATSM PET/CT as a predictor of response in head and neck cancer: a pilot study. Ann Nucl Med 25(5):339–345. doi:10.1007/s12149-011-0471-5
Koh WJ, Bergman KS, Rasey JS, Peterson LM, Evans ML, Graham MM, Grierson JR, Lindsley KL, Lewellen TK, Krohn KA et al (1995) Evaluation of oxygenation status during fractionated radiotherapy in human nonsmall cell lung cancers using [F-18]fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 33(2):391–398. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(95)00170-4
Eschmann SM, Paulsen F, Reimold M, Dittmann H, Welz S, Reischl G, Machulla HJ, Bares R (2005) Prognostic impact of hypoxia imaging with 18F-misonidazole PET in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer before radiotherapy. J Nucl Med 46(2):253–260 (46/2/253 [pii])
Gagel B, Reinartz P, Demirel C, Kaiser HJ, Zimny M, Piroth M, Pinkawa M, Stanzel S, Asadpour B, Hamacher K, Coenen HH, Buell U, Eble MJ (2006) [18F] fluoromisonidazole and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in response evaluation after chemo-/radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer: a feasibility study. BMC Cancer 6:51. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-6-51
Dehdashti F, Mintun MA, Lewis JS, Bradley J, Govindan R, Laforest R, Welch MJ, Siegel BA (2003) In vivo assessment of tumor hypoxia in lung cancer with 60Cu-ATSM. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30(6):844–850. doi:10.1007/s00259-003-1130-4
Dietz DW, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW, Malyapa RS, Myerson RJ, Picus J, Ritter J, Lewis JS, Welch MJ, Siegel BA (2008) Tumor hypoxia detected by positron emission tomography with 60Cu-ATSM as a predictor of response and survival in patients undergoing Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1641–1648. doi:10.1007/s10350-008-9420-3
Grigsby PW, Malyapa RS, Higashikubo R, Schwarz JK, Welch MJ, Huettner PC, Dehdashti F (2007) Comparison of molecular markers of hypoxia and imaging with (60)Cu-ATSM in cancer of the uterine cervix. Mol Imaging Biol 9(5):278–283. doi:10.1007/s11307-007-0095-2
Geets X, Gregoire V, Lee JA (2013) Implementation of hypoxia PET imaging in radiation therapy planning. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 57(3):271–282 (R39Y2013N03A0271 [pii])
Pettersen EO, Ebbesen P, Gieling RG, Williams KJ, Dubois L, Lambin P, Ward C, Meehan J, Kunkler IH, Langdon SP, Ree AH, Flatmark K, Lyng H, Calzada MJ, Peso LD, Landazuri MO, Gorlach A, Flamm H, Kieninger J, Urban G, Weltin A, Singleton DC, Haider S, Buffa FM, Harris AL, Scozzafava A, Supuran CT, Moser I, Jobst G, Busk M, Toustrup K, Overgaard J, Alsner J, Pouyssegur J, Chiche J, Mazure N, Marchiq I, Parks S, Ahmed A, Ashcroft M, Pastorekova S, Cao Y, Rouschop KM, Wouters BG, Koritzinsky M, Mujcic H, Cojocari D (2015) Targeting tumour hypoxia to prevent cancer metastasis. From biology, biosensing and technology to drug development: the METOXIA consortium. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 30(5):689–721. doi:10.3109/14756366.2014.966704
Eustace A, Mani N, Span PN, Irlam JJ, Taylor J, Betts GN, Denley H, Miller CJ, Homer JJ, Rojas AM, Hoskin PJ, Buffa FM, Harris AL, Kaanders JH, West CM (2013) A 26-gene hypoxia signature predicts benefit from hypoxia-modifying therapy in laryngeal cancer but not bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 19(17):4879–4888. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0542
Fyles AW, Milosevic M, Wong R, Kavanagh MC, Pintilie M, Sun A, Chapman W, Levin W, Manchul L, Keane TJ, Hill RP (1998) Oxygenation predicts radiation response and survival in patients with cervix cancer. Radiother Oncol 48(2):149–156 (S0167-8140(98)00044-9 [pii])
Milosevic M, Warde P, Menard C, Chung P, Toi A, Ishkanian A, McLean M, Pintilie M, Sykes J, Gospodarowicz M, Catton C, Hill RP, Bristow R (2012) Tumor hypoxia predicts biochemical failure following radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 18(7):2108–2114. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2711
Acknowledgements
Eric Aboagye would like to acknowledge programmatic funding from Cancer Research UK (C2536/A16584) and the UK Medical Research Council (MR/N020782/1).
Authors contrubutions
A.Challapalli: Content planning, Literature search and review, Manuscript writing, editing. L. Carroll: Content planning, Literature search and review, Manuscript writing, editing. E.Aboagye: Conception, Content planning, Literature search and review, Manuscript writing, editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors, Amarnath Challapalli, Laurence Carroll, and Eric Aboagye declare no conflicts of interest.
Informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Challapalli, A., Carroll, L. & Aboagye, E.O. Molecular mechanisms of hypoxia in cancer. Clin Transl Imaging 5, 225–253 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-017-0231-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-017-0231-1