Abstract
The purpose of this article was to discuss guidelines for the management of the most prevalent chronic diseases treated by primary care physicians (PCPs) in order to identify the best exercise regimen for each clinical population, and to provide preliminary guidance for primary care providers on exercise counselling in the ‘real-world’ context of multimorbidity. After a search of the PubMed electronic database, the 11 most prevalent conditions currently treated by PCPs were identified. The recommendations provided by recognised learned/scientific societies for the management of each disease were then examined and any recommendations involving physical activity and exercise were identified. It was found that the best exercise regimen (i.e. exercise type, intensity, duration, and frequency) was very similar across chronic diseases, which suggests that elaborating and implementing a standardised, minimum exercise guideline for multimorbid patients in primary care may be an alternative approach to time-costly individualised exercise prescriptions. Based on this finding, I propose an example of standardised, cross-disease exercise prescription, and discuss how such a prescription could be operationalised by PCPs in their routine clinical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Exercise is part of the management guidelines for the most prevalent chronic diseases treated in primary care. |
The best exercise regimen (i.e. exercise type, intensity, duration, and frequency) is very similar across chronic diseases. |
Elaborating and implementing a standardised, minimum exercise guideline in primary care for multimorbid patients may be an alternative to time-costly individualised exercise prescriptions. |
1 Introduction
Physical activity (PA) and exercise are recognised as one of an individual’s vital signs [1] and are important factors for health promotion in overall healthy adults and several clinical populations [2–5]. Exercise, a subset of PA that is planned, structured, repetitive, and purposeful, and that is frequently employed for improving or maintaining optimal levels of physical fitness and function, is often used as complementary treatment for very prevalent, burdensome, and costly noncommunicable disease (NCD), such as heart disease [6], stroke [7], osteoarthritis [8], osteoporosis [9], and diabetes [10].
Despite this recognition, PA and exercise are rarely assessed and promoted in the primary care setting [11–14]. Furthermore, when primary care physicians (PCPs) discuss PA with patients, discussions are short (1.5 min on average) and rarely involve providers’ recommendations [15]. Indeed, lack of time is the most important barrier to PA counselling in primary care [16]. Furthermore, researchers have estimated that a physician would need to spend 108 h per year (i.e. >5% of the total average physician time per year) to provide the recommended PA counselling to patients [17]. Besides lack of time, lack of knowledge of PA and lack of counselling protocols, which are completely lacking in the context of multimorbidity (i.e. the presence of two or more chronic conditions), constitute obstacles to PA counselling in primary care. The high prevalence of NCDs and, most importantly, multimorbidity among patients in primary care [18–20] increases, therefore, the difficulty in providing adequate PA counselling in this clinical setting.
The purpose of this current opinion article was to discuss guidelines for the management of the most prevalent chronic diseases treated by PCPs in order to identify the best exercise regimen for each clinical population and to provide preliminary guidance for primary care providers on exercise counselling in the ‘real-world’ context of multimorbidity.
2 Multimorbidity in Primary Care
Studies relating to the prevalence of NCDs and multimorbidity in primary care are sparse [21]. These areas were recently investigated in a cross-sectional study in the US using the PPRNet database, a national primary care practice-based research network, with data from 148 primary care practices, for a total of 667,379 patients aged ≥18 years [18]. The PPRNet found that one-third of patients had either hypertension or hyperlipidaemia, and almost half had multimorbidity [18]. A small number of observational studies in European countries have also investigated the prevalence of NCDs and multimorbidity in primary care adult patients [19–23]. A list of some of the most prevalent chronic conditions for adults aged ≥18 years currently treated in primary care in the US and Europe is presented in Table 1. Beyond individual prevalence, co-occurrence among the conditions presented in Table 1 is very common [20, 23–25]. Hypertension often co-occurs with hyperlipidaemia and/or heart disease and/or diabetes and/or obesity, while patients with either diabetes or heart disease often have hypertension and/or hyperlipidaemia and/or obesity. Asthma, as well as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [26], often co-occurs with hypertension and/or diabetes and/or heart disease [24, 27]. Additionally, subjects suffering from back pain frequently have osteoarthritis or osteoporosis. Several of these diseases are often associated with depression.
3 Methodological Considerations
Although this article is not a literature review, an electronic search was performed in order to gather information on the main diseases currently treated by PCPs. The recent literature relating to chronic conditions among adult patients in primary care was first searched in PubMed in order to identify the most prevalent diseases treated in this setting. We restricted our search (see electronic supplementary material Table S1) to articles published from 2011 onwards (last 5 years) in an attempt to obtain data likely to mirror the reality of conditions currently treated by PCPs. Articles using any study design (except controlled trials, as interventional studies, such as exercise training, may impact the management of NCDs and therefore the patient’s needs and use of primary care resources) were selected if they reported data relating to the prevalence of diseases treated in primary care. References of the retrieved articles [18–22], which included a systematic review [21], were cross-matched to find other potentially relevant studies. From the retrieved articles, some of the most prevalent conditions treated in primary care were identified, as shown in Table 1.
To examine whether PA and exercise are part of best practice for the management of specific diseases according to current guidelines, we examined the recommendations provided by recognised learned/scientific societies for the management of each disease and identified any recommendation involving PA and exercise. We also examined whether the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) has published specific recommendations for the diseases, the ultimate goal being to identify the best exercise prescription for each clinical population. Although no objective criteria were used for the selection of societies, all are well-established and internationally recognised learned/scientific societies responsible for the elaboration of disease management guidelines for the specific chronic conditions examined.
4 Current Physical Activity and Exercise Recommendations for Selected Chronic Conditions
Table 2 shows, for each disease, the learned/scientific societies investigated, whether their recommendations involved PA and exercise, and the exact PA and exercise recommendations provided. For the majority of the 11 conditions examined, the learned/scientific societies clearly identified exercise as an important factor in disease management. For cardiovascular and metabolic conditions, i.e. hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, obesity, and heart disease, exercise is a well-established aspect of disease treatment, leading learned/scientific societies to propose precise exercise guidelines for patients with those conditions. Although these societies identified PA and exercise as an aspect of the treatment of musculoskeletal and bone conditions, i.e. osteoporosis, back pain and osteoarthritis, precise exercise prescriptions for those patients were rare. If reported, the prescriptions were the same as the current international PA guidelines for public health [63], i.e. at least 150 min per week of moderate-intensity aerobic PA, or 75 min per week of vigorous-intensity aerobic PA, or an equivalent combination of moderate- and vigorous-intensity aerobic activity and muscle-strengthening activities of moderate or high intensity on 2 or more days a week (national guidelines in most countries, including the US and the UK, are similar to these international guidelines). Information relating to the role of PA and exercise for the management of asthma remains inconclusive. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was the sole condition for which PA and exercise were not considered important aspects of disease management. However, since one of the recommendations for the management of GERD is weight loss for overweight subjects or those who have recently gained weight, it is plausible to suggest that PA and exercise may play an indirect role in a subpopulation of patients with this condition.
Examination of the reports from the learned/scientific societies (Table 2) revealed that the exercise prescriptions for different diseases were very similar. For example, the exercise prescription for hypertensive patients [25, 26], patients with hyperlipidaemia [25, 27], those with type 2 diabetes [32–36], patients with heart disease (coronary artery disease) [54], and patients with depression [29] suggests that patients should undertake 120–180 min per week of moderate-to-vigorous activity. For patients with obesity [37–40] or heart failure [53, 54], a minimum of 150 min per week of PA applies, but societies suggest up to 300 min per week. In patients with obesity, for example, this higher rate of PA is more effective for avoiding weight regain [39, 40]. Osteoporosis guidelines appear to provide similar recommendations (30 min daily) [49]. Resistance training, i.e. exercises performed to improve muscle strength, is part of the exercise prescription for several conditions, such as diabetes, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis and heart disease; exercises of moderate- to vigorous-intensity two to three times per week is prescribed for all of these conditions.
5 A Standardised Exercise Prescription for Patients with Asymptomatic Conditions
Since the exercise recommendations vary only minimally across the most prevalent chronic conditions, multimorbid patients with asymptomatic diseases may, in theory, benefit from a single, standardised exercise prescription, with only minimal adaptations to the specificities of some diseases (e.g. patients with osteoporosis should be encouraged to do weight-bearing, rather than water-based, activities). On the basis of the guidelines examined and displayed in Table 2, an example of a standardised, cross-disease exercise prescription is proposed in Table 3; however, it is important to note that this exercise prescription would only apply to asymptomatic patients who the PCP, on the basis of his/her clinical judgement, considers could start moderate-intensity exercise without the need for further specific examination. Multimorbid patients with signs and symptoms of their disease may require further medical examinations; these patients may also need to exercise under the surveillance of a clinical exercise physiologist or equivalent health professional.
Since, for most of the examined diseases, the PA and exercise prescription (Table 2) indicate patients should engage in 120–180 min per week of moderate-to-vigorous activity, this lower range was defined as the minimum PA that multimorbid patients should target. The example of a standardised guideline shown in Table 3 may represent a conservative approach for some conditions (e.g. obesity); however, it has the advantage of being safe and potentially effective for all patients provided their disease is asymptomatic. Moreover, this minimum exercise prescription can potentially be provided by the PCP in a brief advice format during a typical time-constrained consultation, especially when accompanied by supporting written material (e.g. electronic supplementary material Box S1).
The exercise prescription provided in Table 3 is similar to current public health guidelines on PA [63] but with three main differences:
-
1.
It does not involve all PA domains. The total amount of exercise includes only leisure-time and commuting PA, which have been shown to result in superior health benefits [64]; occupational and household PA is not integrated into the suggested guideline.
-
2.
The minimum PA rate of 120 min per week is less than the PA amount recommended in current public health guidelines (150 min per week), which suggests that the proposed standard prescription will probably be easier to adhere to over the long-term.
-
3.
The proposed standardised guideline includes a prescription for reducing sitting time.
In regard to the last point, while no learned/scientific societies have integrated specific guidelines for reducing sitting time, important findings from recent well-conducted meta-analyses have found that increased sitting time is associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality [65, 66]. Mortality risk appears to be greater after 7 h per day of sitting time, and increases by 34% after 10 h per day of sitting [66]. The associations between sitting time and adverse health outcomes occur independently of PA levels.
6 Guidance for Primary Care Providers
Providing a comprehensive consultation guided by the ‘6As’ (assess, advise, agree, assist, arrange and assess again), as well as other practical steps [1] for prescribing an individualised exercise plan, should represent the ideal approach to increase PA levels among patients in primary care; however, most primary care doctors do not have the time, knowledge or intent to implement those steps. Nevertheless, their advice and capacity to stimulate participation in PA and exercise remain crucial for patients.
When assessing any patient with any of the chronic conditions listed in Table 1 (with the exception of GERD), or presenting with other diseases potentially treatable through exercise (e.g. COPD), primary care providers should systematically ask two questions [67]. (1) In a typical week, how many days do you engage in moderate or greater PA (such as a brisk walk) during your leisure time or to move from one location to another? (2) On each of those days, how many minutes do you spend doing such activities?
After multiplying the number of weekly days by the minutes spent in PA each day, healthcare providers can obtain the total weekly amount of leisure-time and commuting PA usually performed by the patient. If the total amount of PA is less than 120 min per week, the patient has no contraindication to exercise (see electronic supplementary material Box S2), and the PCP judges the patient as being clinically able to undertake moderate-intensity activity, he/she should provide the patient with a standardised minimum exercise prescription, as shown in Table 3, together with written supporting resources (electronic supplementary material Box S1). It is important to note that the exercise prescription should be a formal medical prescription, just like a drug prescription (with the physician’s stamp and signature).
7 Conclusions
Exercise is an important component of the treatment of several prevalent and burdensome chronic diseases, thus making it part of best practice for such conditions. Providing multimorbid patients with an exercise prescription is therefore the duty of any healthcare provider, particularly in the primary care setting. Individualising counselling [68], after examining the patient’s readiness for behavioural change and establishing suitable specific goals, is an effective approach to promote PA in adults in primary care practice, and this individualised counselling approach should be pursued whenever possible. However, counselling patients about PA and exercise in this setting remains rare [16] because it is time-consuming, requires enhanced knowledge of exercise counselling, and no exercise guidelines have been developed for multimorbid patients.
Therefore, the approach to elaborating a standardised, minimum exercise guideline for patients with multiple chronic conditions proposed herein is an alternative to the traditional individualised exercise prescription. The construction of this standardised prescription is based on the thought that ‘doing something for my patients is better than doing nothing’. In other words, providing a nonindividualised exercise prescription is better than providing no exercise prescription. When providing any exercise guidelines, PCPs and other healthcare providers must keep in mind that any amount of PA and exercise is better than none. The dose–response association between PA and health benefits is well-established [69–72], with the greatest benefit found when subjects move from a sedentary behavior to being slightly active [69, 72]. They should also provide positive feedback for patients who start doing some exercise, even though these patients do not achieve the levels of exercise recommended in the guidelines. PCPs should advise patients about local resources for PA and exercise, such as health and fitness centres or sports clubs (e.g. hiking clubs), in the neighbourhood. Encouraging patients to find other peers to exercise with may be important for long-term adherence to exercise [73].
Although the elaboration of a standardised exercise guideline for multimorbid patients suffering from the most prevalent NCDs managed by PCPs is very attractive, future research is needed to validate this approach and to define the best structure (e.g. guidelines in the form of bullet points or script) and content of standardised minimum exercise guidelines in terms of (cost-) effectiveness for well-defined subgroups of multimorbid patients.
References
Khan KM, Weiler R, Blair SN. Prescribing exercise in primary care. BMJ. 2011;343:d4141.
Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major noncommunicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–29.
Warburton DE, Charlesworth S, Ivey A, et al. A systematic review of the evidence for Canada’s Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:39.
Norton S, Matthews FE, Barnes DE, et al. Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):788–94.
Forouzanfar MH, Alexander L, GBD 2013 Risk Factors Collaborators, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386(10010):2287–323.
Gielen S, Laughlin MH, O’Conner C, et al. Exercise training in patients with heart disease: review of beneficial effects and clinical recommendations. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;57(4):347–55.
Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45(8):2532–53.
Focht BC. Effectiveness of exercise interventions in reducing pain symptoms among older adults with knee osteoarthritis: a review. J Aging Phys Act. 2006;14(2):212–35.
Giangregorio LM, Papaioannou A, Macintyre NJ, et al. Too fit to fracture: exercise recommendations for individuals with osteoporosis or osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(3):821–35.
Colberg SR, Albright AL, Blissmer BJ, et al. Exercise and type 2 diabetes: American College of Sports Medicine and the American Diabetes Association: joint position statement. Exercise and type 2 diabetes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(12):2282–303.
Smith AW, Borowski LA, Liu B, et al. U.S. primary care physicians’ diet-, physical activity-, and weight-related care of adult patients. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(1):33–42.
Bock C, Diehm C, Schneider S. Physical activity promotion in primary health care: results from a German physician survey. Eur J Gen Pract. 2012;18(2):86–91.
van Dillen SME, Noordman J, van Dulmen S, et al. Examining the content of weight, nutrition and physical activity advices provided by Dutch practice nurses in primary care: analysis of videotaped consultations. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(1):50–6.
Galaviz KI, Jauregui-Ulloa E, Fabrigar LR, et al. Physical activity prescription among Mexican physicians: a structural equation analysis of the theory of planned behaviour. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;69(3):375–83.
Bardach SH, Schoenberg NE. The content of diet and physical activity consultations with older adults in primary care. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;95(3):319–24.
Hébert ET, Caughy MO, Shuval K. Primary care providers’ perceptions of physical activity counselling in a clinical setting: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(9):625–31.
Yarnall KSH, Pollak KI, Østbye T, et al. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):635–41.
Ornstein SM, Nietert PJ, Jenkins RG, et al. The prevalence of chronic diseases and multimorbidity in primary care practice: a PPRNet report. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013;26(5):518–24.
Rizza A, Kaplan V, Senn O, et al. Age- and gender-related prevalence of multimorbidity in primary care: the Swiss FIRE project. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:113.
van Oostrom SH, Picavet HSJ, van Gelder BM, et al. Multimorbidity and comorbidity in the Dutch population - data from general practices. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:715.
Fortin M, Stewart M, Poitras ME, et al. A systematic review of prevalence studies on multimorbidity: toward a more uniform methodology. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10:142–51.
Schäfer I, Hansen H, Schön G, et al. The influence of age, gender and socio-economic status on multimorbidity patterns in primary care. First results from the multicare cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:89.
Laux G, Kuehlein T, Rosemann T, et al. Co- and multimorbidity patterns in primary care based on episodes of care: results from the German CONTENT project. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:14.
Garin N, Koyanagi A, Chatterji S, et al. Global multimorbidity patterns: a cross-sectional, population-based, multi-country study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71(2):205–14.
Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43.
Negewo NA, McDonald VM, Gibson PG. Comorbidity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Investig. 2015;53(6):249–58.
Kauppi P, Linna M, Jantunen J, et al. Chronic comorbidities contribute to the burden and costs of persistent asthma. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:819194.
Weber MA, Schiffrin EL, White WB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community a statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2014;32(1):3–15.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management: clinical guideline. Published: 24 August 2011. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg127. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.
Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S76–99.
Pescatello LS, Franklin BA, Fagard R, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and hypertension. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(3):533–53.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Cardiovascular disease: risk assessment and reduction, including lipid modification: Clinical guideline. Published: 18 July 2014. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg181. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.
American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. 3rd ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2010.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Depression in adults: recognition and management. Clinical guideline. Published: 28 October 2009. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg90. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.
Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(3):308–28 (quiz 329).
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Gastrooesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management. Clinical guideline. Published: 3 September 2014. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg184. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.
Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Fernhall B, et al. Exercise and type 2 diabetes: the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Diabetes Association: joint position statement executive summary. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(12):2692–6.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Type 2 diabetes in adults: management. NICE guideline. Published: 2 December 2015. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Physical activity: brief advice for adults in primary care. Public health guideline. Published: 29 May 2013. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph44. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.
Marwick TH, Hordern MD, Miller T, et al. Exercise training for type 2 diabetes mellitus: impact on cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2009;119(25):3244–62.
International Diabetes Federation, Clinical Guidelines Task Force. Global guideline for type 2 diabetes. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2012.
National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. NIH Publication No. 98-4083. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1998.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Obesity: identification, assessment and management. Clinical guideline. Published: 27 November 2014. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg189. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.
Donnelly JE, Blair SN, Jakicic JM, et al. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Appropriate physical activity intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(2):459–71.
Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S102–38.
McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2014;22(3):363–88.
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline. 2nd ed. Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2013.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Osteoarthritis: care and management. Clinical guideline. Published: 12 February 2014. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg177. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.
Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, et al. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(4):465–74.
Chung KF, Wenzel SE, Brozek JL, et al. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur Respir J. 2014;43(2):343–73.
National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 2007.
British Thoracic Society and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. British guideline on the management of asthma: a national clinical guideline. British Thoracic Society and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2014.
National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2014.
Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Camacho PM, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Pract. 2010;16(Suppl 3):1–37.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures: a national clinical guideline. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2015. (SIGN publication no. 142). http://www.sign.ac.uk.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Chronic heart failure in adults: management. Clinical guideline. Published: 25 August 2010. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg108. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.
Piña IL, Apstein CS, Balady GJ, et al. Exercise and heart failure: a statement from the American Heart Association Committee on exercise, rehabilitation, and prevention. Circulation. 2003;107(8):1210–25.
Fletcher GF, Ades PA, Kligfield P, et al. Exercise standards for testing and training: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128(8):873–934.
American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise for patients with coronary artery disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26(3):i–v.
Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(7):478–91.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Low back pain in adults: early management. Clinical guideline. Published: 27 May 2009. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg88. Accessed 11 Feb 2016.
Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(8):1435–45.
World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: WHO; 2010. p. 58.
de Souto Barreto P. Time to challenge public health guidelines on physical activity. Sports Med. 2015;45(6):769–73.
Grøntved A, Hu FB. Television viewing and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;305(23):2448–55.
Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, et al. Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80000.
Sallis R. Developing healthcare systems to support exercise: exercise as the fifth vital sign. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(6):473–4.
Orrow G, Kinmonth A-L, Sanderson S, et al. Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;344:e1389.
Arem H, Moore SC, Patel A, et al. Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(6):959–67.
de Souto Barreto P, Cesari M, Andrieu S, et al. Physical activity and incident chronic diseases: a longitudinal observational study in 16 European countries. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(3):373–8.
Moore SC, Lee I-M, Weiderpass E, et al. Association of leisure-time physical activity with risk of 26 types of cancer in 1.44 million adults. JAMA. Intern Med. 2016;176(6):816–25.
Moore SC, Patel AV, Matthews CE, et al. Leisure time physical activity of moderate to vigorous intensity and mortality: a large pooled cohort analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001335.
Kelly S, Martin S, Kuhn I, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake and maintenance of healthy behaviours by people at mid-life: a rapid systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0145074.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.
Conflicts of interest
Philipe de Souto Barreto has no conflicts of interest to declare relevant to the content of this article.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Souto Barreto, P. Exercise for Multimorbid Patients in Primary Care: One Prescription for All?. Sports Med 47, 2143–2153 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0725-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0725-z