Abstract
Purpose
The nutritional content of fermented fertilizers was determined, and the effect of its application in combination with hydrogel was evaluated in a bioassay with maize plants.
Methods
The fertilizers were produced in artisanal biodigesters and the bioassay was carried out in pots with CP-569 maize. The nutritional content of the fermented fertilizers was evaluated, and in maize plants growth variables were measured, along with N–P–K contents in the aerial and root biomass.
Results
The types of biol show different characteristics for organic matter, N, N–NH4, N–NO3, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn and B, as well as physical characteristics. The terms of the bioassay, the treatments with super absorbent polymer (SAP), biol and biol + SAP, showed significant statistical differences in terms of plant height, stem diameter and number of leaves 30 days after emergence. In the dry weight of aerial and root biomass, no statistical differences were found. In terms of the contents of N–P–K in biomass, statistical differences were found for P in aerial biomass and K in both aerial and root biomass.
Conclusion
Due to their physical and chemical properties, biols are an alternative to fertilizers. With the application of biol and SAP, maize plants undergo significant increases in height, stem diameter and number of leaves. By applying biol and SAP, the contents of N–P–K were not increased significantly in the aerial and root biomasses in comparison to the control.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
To produce high-quality crops (Fathy et al. 2018), an alternative to organic fertilizer is fermented fertilizer, which is the name given to the effluents produced in the fermentation or digestion of organic wastes from biodigesters (Ndubuaku et al. 2013). Biogas production through anaerobic digestion leaves organic residues (digestates), which are rich in nutrients, the use of which can replace or at least reduce the use of mineral fertilizers in crop production (Sogn et al. 2018).
Digestate or effluent is composed of a liquid fraction known as biol and the solid fraction biosol, the biol being the most widely used and which accounts for 90% of the effluent (Rivero 2012). The liquid phase of digestates is rich in nutrients, such as ammonium (NH4 +), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and nitrogen (N) available to the plant by microbial decomposition and mineralization of the solid phase of the digestates (Sogn et al. 2018). Biol is an alternative for the fertilization of crops due to its nutrient content (Kaparaju and Rintala 2011; Masse et al. 2013; Ndubuaku et al. 2013; Osorio 2005).
The quality of the biol, taking into account the process of fermentation in terms of the composition of nutrients and physical properties, depends on the materials (inputs) used during fermentation (Ndubuaku et al. 2013). Biol is obtained with the use of inputs such as animal manure, mainly bovines (Bustamante et al. 2012; Holm-Nielsen et al. 2009), as well as flours, molasses and plants (de Oliveira et al. 2014). Farmers can modify the content of nutrients in the liquid fertilizer and add different sub-products such as fish guts, seaweed or human urine (Osorio 2005), mineral salts (Agbulu and Idu 2008) and milk whey (Rivera and Hensel 2013), enhancing the efficiency of materials used to obtain quality fertilizer (Preston 2005). Sometimes, a pre-digestion of the inputs used is performed, for example in a study by Kataki et al. (2017) similar to this study, initially crushed rice husk and green stubble were hydrolyzed for 30 days as pretreatment prior to anaerobic digestion. Green leaves of Ipomoea were cut before digestion and cow manure was used without any previous treatment, both for simple digestion and for co-digestion.
The relevance of the production of biol lies in the capability of use and accessibility to local inputs by farmers (Agbulu and Idu 2008). A small-scale biodigester is enough to produce biol and most farmers have manure available in their production units to use this technique; therefore, the construction and use of biodigesters is expected to have a low cost and that the materials used are available locally (Osorio 2005). The use of biol as an agricultural fertilizer boosts the use of organic residues to reduce the environmental impact of agriculture, reducing the amount of inorganic fertilizers (Walsh et al. 2012) and satisfying the need for alternative, cheaper and more efficient fertilizers (Soria Fregoso et al. 2001). It has been used with fertilizers for Zea mays L. (Leblanc et al. 2007; Morris and Lathwell 2004), Abelmoschus esculentus (Ndubuaku et al. 2013) and Carica papaya (Barrientos et al. 2007), mainly to contribute to the nutritional needs for their growth.
As a complement to the fertilization of crops, hydrogels or superabsorbent polymers (SAP) are used to immobilize, encapsulate and release, in a controlled manner, water and organic fertilizers. The polymers absorb and retain large amounts of water and soil nutrients and keep them available for the plant. They can absorb up to 150 times their own volume, with a retention capacity of 980 mL of water mL−1 g−1 (Pedroza-Sandoval et al. 2015). With this, soils improve their moisture release and retention properties, which translate into a higher production and resistance of plants to conditions of drought (Dabhi et al. 2013; Koupai et al. 2008). Some authors have reported the use of SAP in crops such as maize, Capsicum nahum L., Lactuca sativa L. and Anaheim chilies (Capsicum annuum L.), which have resulted in greater plant height, foliar area, grain yield, accumulation of biomass in maize and greater root development (Egrinya Eneji et al. 2013; López-Elías et al. 2013; Torres et al. 2008). In the case of maize, SAP doses of 60 kg ha−1 have been used (Islam et al. 2011; Najafinezhad et al. 2015), producing important effects on the growth of maize (Pedroza-Sandoval et al. 2015).
The objective of the research was to evaluate the effect of the application of fermented liquid fertilizer and superabsorbent polymers on the growth and absorption of N–P–K in maize plants through a bioassay.
Materials and methods
Location
The investigation was carried out in the Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Veracruz, in the land named Tepetates, in the municipal area of Manlio Fabio Altamirano, Veracruz, México, 19.27°N, 96.27°W at a height of 36 m above sea level, in the months of May 2015 and January 2016.
Fermented fertilizer production
Type batch biodigesters were created by hand and at low cost between March and July, the “dry season”. For this, we used buckets with lids, with a capacity of 19 L each. They were connected to a hose to condition the exit of gas and sealed using insulating tape at the exit to avoid leaks. The hose was finally led to the escape valve using a 0.6 L PET bottle, filled halfway with water (Fig. 1). A low-cost stationary digester does not suggest a sophisticated design. Perfect sealing of the gas outlet is necessary, as well as the monitoring of the exhaust valve, always taking care to contain in the water. In the exhaust valve with water, the gas is released safely when there is high pressure inside the digester.
Different plant and animal by-products were used and the procedure was carried out using the anaerobic digestion technique, according to the methodology described by Osorio (2005). The bucket was placed under the sun for a 60-day period. The bucket was shaken every week to achieve a uniform fermentation of all the materials. At the end of this period, the effluent was obtained. For this, three types of biols were produced (Table 1). Fresh bovine manure, sugarcane molasses, and Mucuna pruriens var. utilis paste, harvested in flowering, were used.
At the end of the fermentation process, the solid and liquid parts of the fertilizer were separated by filtration, using a plastic millimetric mesh for the types of biol. A 500 mL sample was taken using containers of that volume and they were not exposed to light. They were later taken to the laboratory. The following were established using the methodology established by the Official Mexican Norm NOM-021-RECNAT-2000 (SEMARNAT 2002): pH, electric conductivity, organic matter, total nitrogen, ammonium, nitrates, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, iron, copper, zinc, manganese and boron.
Bioassay
For the sowing of maize with the application of biol and superabsorbent polymers, soil, which displayed the following characteristics, was collected: pH 7.5, N total 0.33%, electric conductivity 1.04 dS m−1, organic matter 7.73%, inorganic nitrogen 98.3 mg kg−1, P 33.81 mg kg−1, K 684 mg kg−1, cationic exchange capacity 31.8 Cmol (+) kg−1, apparent density 1.07 mg m−3, field capacity 28.53% and saturation point 54.11%.
The study evaluated four treatments: (1) application of superabsorbent polymers (SAP), (2) application of fermented fertilizer (biol) + SAP, (3) application of biol only and (4) a control (no application). The experiment used a randomized complete block design with five repetitions. Three CP-569 maize seeds were sown in pots at a depth of 3 cm; at germination, only one plant was chosen and the rest were discarded. The experimental unit consisted of each pot with an average of 5.3 kg of soil with one plant, with 20 plants in the experiment.
Each plant was added 1 g of the Silos de Agua® super absorbent polymer (SAP) at the time of planting, using 62.5 kg ha−1. A similar dose to that used by Islam et al. (2011) and Najafinezhad et al. (2015) (60 kg ha−1) was deposited by making a hole in the soil, 5 cm deep, and at a distance of 10 cm from the plant. For the case of corn, Biol 1 was the used in the bioassay. The biol was applied at the emergence of the plants and 15 after day, 10 mL per plant, diluted at 50% volume per volume of water (v/v), 20 mL per plant of the solution. The amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium applied in the solution were 22.23, 0.26 and 1.2 mg L−1, respectively, for each application. The contribution of the application of biol per hectare is 2.7 kg of nitrogen, 0.03 kg of phosphorus and 0.1 kg of potassium. The plants were irrigated with tap water and kept free of weeds.
Plant height was measured using a ruler and read from the base of the stem up to the maximum length of the leaves, picking them up upward. The stem diameter was measured using a digital caliper, measuring at a height of 5 cm from the base of the stem, and the leaves of each plant were counted. This was carried out 30 days after emergency (DAE) of the plants. Plant tissue samples were taken 35 days after planting (DAP), and the aerial biomass (leaves and stem) and root biomass of the plants were separated and placed in paper bags by treatment and repetition. The roots were washed to remove leftover soil using tap water.
The samples were dried in a forced air oven at a temperature of 60 °C, until it reached a constant weight, which represents the dry matter in grams. A chemical analysis was performed on the plant tissue of the aerial biomass and root biomass of the plant, determining nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method, phosphorus digested with a diacid mixture and determined by photocolorimetry by reduction with molybdenum vanadate and potassium digested with a diacidic mixture and determined by flame spectrophotometry. The statistical analyses of the study variables were carried out using the SAS statistical package version 9.4 for Windows (SAS 2014), with average tests using Tukey α = 0.05.
Results and discussion
Fermented fertilizer production
The nutrient concentrations show differences among the three types of biol (Table 2), since the fertilizer quality depends on the inputs with different physical and chemical characteristics (Herrán et al. 2008). Another indicator of quality is fermentation; an optimal period can be 40 days according to de Oliveira Neto et al. (2017), who mention that the greatest availability of nutrients in biofertilizer occurs with a longer fermentation period, because in a short period sufficient decomposition of biofertilizer does not occur to release nutrients. In our study, fermentation was carried out for 60 days, so it is considered that a quality fertilizer was produced. Also, bad odors are eliminated, which is an indicator that the fermentation has been carried out successfully, as it happened in this study. The above favors the elimination of coliforms (Arslan Topal et al. 2016; Hernández-Chontal et al. 2016).
Bioassay
The plant height variable showed significant differences (p = 0.0068 and HSD of 7.99 cm, Table 3). SAP and biol treatments reached the greatest level, surpassing the control treatment. The stem diameter displayed significant differences among different treatments (p = 0.0134 and HSD of 0.21 cm). Greater stem diameters were obtained in SAP and biol treatments, showing differences with regard to the control. The number of leaf variable showed no statistical differences (p = 0.2828 and HSD of 1.3 cm).
Biol is an organic amendment that adds nutrients and organic matter and offers many opportunities to improve the physical, chemical and biological properties of soil, important for the success of soil recovery initiatives (Larney and Angers 2012). Ndubuaku et al. (2013) applied biol in okra and, 6 weeks later, obtained significant differences in the height of plants, number of leaves and stem circumference, in comparison with treatments in which biol was not used. This can be evidenced by the presence of organic matter in the biofertilizer, because it intervenes in the supply of nutrients by mineralization, in particular, the release of N, P, sulfur and micronutrients available to plants.
Morris and Lathwell (2004) indicate that fermented liquid fertilizers, such as biol, stimulate greater maize growth in the early stages of plant development, even more than sources of inorganic fertilizers, if applied to an acid soil, as in this study. In this sense, the organic matter improves the infiltration of water and reduces its loss by evaporation. It improves the drainage of the soil with a fine texture and therefore helps to better distribute the water in the soil profile (Cepeda Dovala 2016).
However, polymers have the capacity to absorb 400–1500 g of water per dry gram (Koupai et al. 2008), retain it and make it available for plant growth (Akhter et al. 2004). Islam et al. (2011) mention that the application of 60 kg ha−1 of SAP (a dose similar to that used in this study) increases the height of maize plants by 14.1%, compared to treatments without applications. When applying SAP in Pennisetum americanum L., an increase in height is achieved (Keshavars et al. 2012).
It has been shown that with this polymer, the accumulation of biomass is correlated with N and K amounts in shoots of Lolium perenne L. cv. Victoriana and can also improve the growth of plants even in soils contaminated by heavy metals (Qu et al. 2010). In very serious cases with high amounts, its concentration has a close relationship with the biological activity of the soil; a high concentration of heavy metals inhibits this activity (Puoci et al. 2008). Studies carried out by Linares-Gabriel et al. (2016) have found favorable results in agronomic variables in flowers of heliconias, with the combination of agricultural amendments (biol and superabsorbent polymers). In the same way, Linares Gabriel et al. (2018) evaluated these agricultural amendments and found significant results for a variable number of leaves.
With respect to the dry matter (DM) accumulated at 35 DAP (days after sowing) of corn, the analysis of variance did not present significant differences for the aerial biomass (p = 0.6273 and HSD of 4.05 g) and biomass of the root (p = 0.4828 and HSD of 2.13 g, Table 3). Regarding the contents of N–P–K in aerial biomass, the following results were found. The variable P (p = 0.1869 and HSD of 0.062 g) and K (p = 0.0195 and HSD of 0.0798 g) showed significant differences. The variable N did not show statistical differences (p = 0.4137 and HSD of 0.0637 g). For the contents of N–P–K in radical biomass, the following results were found. The K variable showed significant differences (p = 0.0341 and HSD of 0.1782 g). The variable N (p = 0.1668 and HSD of 0.1118 g) and P (p = 0.6211 and HSD of 0.1193 g) did not show statistical differences.
Based on the Tukey test for comparison of means (α = 0.05), the treatments with biol application displayed the highest values for P and K contents in the aerial biomass in comparison with the control, as well as the K contents in root biomass, in which the treatment with biol application was also significant (Table 3). Regarding N, the soil managed to provide the largest amount of N, and this is explained by the fact that the N availability in the soil is produced by the high percentages of organic matter (Rodríguez and De León 2008) as occurred in this study. In terms of P, an acidic pH reduces the amount of phosphorus available, although the favorable application of SAP, due to water disposition, helped the roots to concentrate phosphorus by diffusion in the aerial biomass, related to the application of biol. Khadem et al. (2010) mention that the highest amounts of K absorption are due to the presence of enough organic matter in the soil and the moisture in the presence of SAP. In general terms, the same authors point out that the combined effects of organic fertilizer and super absorbent polymers increase the absorption of nutrients (N–P–K) and the supply of soil moisture.
No statistical differences were found in the variables on application of the fermented fertilizer, because the effect of organic fertilizers is long term. The fermented fertilizers or digestates can contribute with an additional supply of N by the mineralization of the organic matter, having impact on more advanced stages of the plants and therefore in the production of biomass (Sogn et al. 2018). It is important to consider that the absorption of plant nutrients depends largely on the release of nutrients from the solid phase of the soil in the form of mineral and organic materials to the soil solution (Fathy et al. 2018; Nurhidayati et al. 2018).
Conclusion
The effect seen in this bioassay was significantly reflected in the variables height and plant diameter, phosphorus for aerial biomass and potassium in root biomass. This effect was seen with the application of biol, SAP, and the combination of both treatments. Although for the biomass the treatments did not show significant effects, the same happened for nitrogen.
References
Agbulu ON, Idu EE (2008) An assessment of organic and inorganic vegetable farming in Benue Valley of North Central Nigeria (implication for agricultural educators). J Hum Ecol 23:345–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2008.11906088
Akhter J, Mahmood K, Malik K, Mardan A, Ahmad M, Iqbal M (2004) Effects of hydrogel amendment on water storage of sandy loam and loam soils and seedling growth of barley, wheat and chickpea. Plant Soil Environ 50:463–469. https://doi.org/10.17221/4059-PSE
Arslan Topal EI, Ünlü A, Topal M (2016) Effect of aeration rate on elimination of coliforms during composting of vegetable–fruit wastes. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 5:243–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-016-0134-6
Barrientos G, García AG, Spaans CS, Weil E (2007) Los Abonos líquidos fermentados y su efectividad en plántulas de papaya (Carica papaya L.). Tierra Trop 3:91–96. http://tierratropical.org/es/editions/edition-3-1-2007/fermented-liquid-fertilizers-and-their-effectiveness-in-agriculture-production/
Bustamante MA, Alburquerque JA, Restrepo AP, de la Fuente C, Paredes C, Moral R, Bernal MP (2012) Co-composting of the solid fraction of anaerobic digestates, to obtain added-value materials for use in agriculture. Biomass Bioenergy 43:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.010
Cepeda Dovala JM (2016) Química de suelos. Editorial Trillas, Mexico
Dabhi R, Bhatt N, Pandit B (2013) Superabsorbent polymersan innovative water saving technique for optimizing crop yield. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2:5333–5340. https://www.ijirset.com/upload/october/30_2SUPER.pdf
de Oliveira Neto HT, Gondim ARO, Sá FVS, Souto LS, Brito MEB, da Silva MS, de Lira RP (2017) Growth, gas exchanges and production of beet CV. Katrina under organo-mineral fertilization. Biosci J 33:1126–1133. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v33n5a2017-36554
de Oliveira JR, Gomes RLF, Araújo ASF, Marini FS, Lopes JB, Araújo RM (2014) Nutritional status and yield of pepper with the use of liquid biofertilizers. Rev Bras Eng Agríc Ambient 18:1241–1246. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v18n12p1241-1246
Egrinya Eneji A, Islam R, An P, Amalu UC (2013) Nitrate retention and physiological adjustment of maize to soil amendment with superabsorbent polymers. J Clean Prod 52:474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.027
Fathy SA, Mahmoud AE, Rashad MM, Ezz MK, Mohammed AT (2018) Improving the nutritive value of olive pomace by solid state fermentation of Kluyveromyces marxianus with simultaneous production of gallic acid. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-018-0199-5
Hernández-Chontal MA, Linares-Gabriel A, Rodríguez Orozco N, Velasco-Velasco J, Tinoco Alfaro CA, López-Collado CJ, López-Romero G (2016) Elaboración Artesanal de Fertilizante Líquido Fermentado “Biol”, en dos Épocas del Año. In: Lango Reynoso F, CCMdR, Galaviz Villa I, Montoya Mendoza J, Adame García J, Martínez-Hernández MJ, Del Ángel Pérez AL, Gallardo-López F, Landeros Sánchez C (eds) AGRO VERACRUZANO. Instituto Tecnológico Superior de San Andrés Tuxtla, Veracruz. pp 270–285. doi:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312589462_ELABORACION_ARTESANAL_DE_FERTILIZANTE_LIQUIDO_FERMENTADO_BIOL_EN_DOS_EPOCAS_DEL_ANO
Herrán J, Torres RRS, Rojo GE (2008) Importancia de los abonos orgánicos. Ra Ximhai 4:57–67. http://www.ejournal.unam.mx/rxm/vol04-01/RXM004000104.pdf
Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P (2009) The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour Technol 100:5478–5484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046
Islam M, Mao J, Egrinya E, Xue Y (2011) Feasibility of summer corn (Zea mays L.) production in drought affected areas of northern china using water-saving superabsorbent polymer. Plant Soil Environ Beijing 57:279–285. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/216327772_Feasibility_of_summer_corn_Zea_mays_L_production_in_drought_affected_areas_of_northern_China_using_water-saving_superabsorbent_polymer
Kaparaju P, Rintala J (2011) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by adopting anaerobic digestion technology on dairy, sow and pig farms in Finland. Renew Energy 36:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.05.016
Kataki S, Hazarika S, Baruah DC (2017) Assessment of by-products of bioenergy systems (anaerobic digestion and gasification) as potential crop nutrient. Waste Manag 59:102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.018
Keshavars L, Farahbakhsh H, Golkar P (2012) The effects of drought stress and super absorbent polymer on morphphysiological traits of pear millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Int Res J Basic Appl Sci. 3:148–154. http://pakacademicsearch.com/pdf-files/sci/71/148-154%20Volume%203%20,No.%201%20,2012.pdf
Khadem SH, Rousta MJ, Chorom M, Khadem SA, Kasraeyan A (2010) The effects of different rates of super absorbent polymers and manure on corn nutrient uptake. In: Proceedings of the 19th world congress of soil science: soil solutions for a changing world, Brisbane, Australia, 1–6 August 2010. Symposium 3.3. 1 Integrated nutrient management, 2010. International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS), c/o Institut für Bodenforschung, Universität für Bodenkultur, pp 314–316. http://www.iuss.org/…/0636.pdf
Koupai JA, Eslamian SS, Kazemi JA (2008) Enhancing the available water content in unsaturated soil zone using hydrogel, to improve plant growth indices. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 8:67–75. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10104-009-0005-0
Larney FJ, Angers DA (2012) The role of organic amendments in soil reclamation: a review. Can J Soil Sci 92:19–38. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss2010-064
Leblanc H, Cerrato M, Miranda A, Valle G (2007) Determinación de la calidad de abonos orgánicos a través de bioensayos. Tierra Trop 3:97–107. http://tierratropical.org/es/editions/edition-3-1-2007/determining-the-quality-of-organic-fertilizers-using-bioassays/
Linares Gabriel A, López-Collado CJ, Hernández-Chontal MA, Velasco-Velasco J, López-Romero G (2018) Application of soil amendments and their effect in the growth of heliconia. Ornamen Hortic 24:7. https://doi.org/10.14295/oh.v24i3.1252
Linares-Gabriel A, López-Collado CJ, Tinoco-Alfaro CA, Velasco-Velasco J, López-Romero G (2016) Application of biol, inorganic fertilizer and superabsorbent polymers in the growth of heliconia (Heliconia psittacorum cv. Tropica). Rev Chapingo Ser Hortic 5:35–48. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2016.02.004
López-Elías J, Huez-López MA, Rueda-Puente EO, Jiménez-León J, Rodríguez JC, Romero-Espinoza LK, Dávila-Carrera FX (2013) Evaluación de un polímero hidrófilo en chile Anaheim (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivado en invernadero. Terra Latinoam 31. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/tl/v31n2/2395-8030-tl-31-02-00115.pdf
Masse DI, Gilbert Y, Saady NM, Liu C (2013) Low-temperature anaerobic digestion of swine manure in a plug-flow reactor. Environ Technol 34:2617–2624. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.781229
Morris DR, Lathwell DJ (2004) Anaerobically digested dairy manure as fertilizer for maize in acid and alkaline soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 35:1757–1771. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120038567
Najafinezhad H, Tahmasebi Sarvestani Z, Modarres Sanavy SAM, Naghavi H (2015) Evaluation of yield and some physiological changes in corn and sorghum under irrigation regimes and application of barley residue, zeolite and superabsorbent polymer. Arch Agron Soil Sci 61:891–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.959938
Ndubuaku U, Imegwu C, Ndubuaku N (2013) Nutrient compositions of liquid and solid fractions of organic waste fermentation and the influence on growth and yield of okra. Int J Curr Tr Res 21:415–424. http://www.journalijdr.com/nutrient-compositions-liquid-and-solid-fractions-organic-waste-fermentation-and-influence-growth-and
Nurhidayati N, Machfudz M, Murwani I (2018) Direct and residual effect of various vermicompost on soil nutrient and nutrient uptake dynamics and productivity of four mustard Pak-Coi (Brassica rapa L.) sequences in organic farming system. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-018-0203-0
Osorio LG (2005) Improving organic fertilizers. Low Extern Input Sustain Agric 21:14–15. http://edepot.wur.nl/92165
Pedroza-Sandoval A, Yáñez-Chávez LG, Sánchez-Cohen I, Samaniego-Gaxiola JA (2015) Efecto del hidrogel y vermicomposta en la producción de maíz. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 38:375–381. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-73802015000400005
Preston T (2005) Los biodigestores en los sistemas agrícolas ecológicos. Leisa Revista de Agroecología 21:18–22. http://leisa-al.org/web/index.php/statistics/volumen-21-numero-1/2060-los-biodigestores-en-los-sistemas-agricolas-ecologicos
Puoci F, Francesca I, Gianfranco Spizzirri U, Cirillo G, Curcio M, Nevio P (2008) Polymer in agriculture: a review. Am J Agric Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2008.299.314
Qu G, de Varennes A, Cunha-Queda C (2010) Use of insoluble polyacrylate polymers to aid phytostabilization of mine soils: effects on plant growth and soil characteristics. J Environ Qual 39:168–175. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0081
Rivera R, Hensel J (2013) El ABC de la agricultura orgánica, fosfitos y panes de piedra. J Restrepo Rivera. http://www.lineaclave.org/web/download/el-abc-de-agricultura-organica-fosfitos-y-panes-de-piedra/
Rivero OC (2012) Sistema Integral Tratamiento De Residuos De Granja Lechera Mediante La Biodigestion Anaerobia En El Peru. Desarrollo Local Sostenible. http://www.eumed.net/rev/delos/14/ocr.html
Rodríguez M, De León C (2008) El cultivo del maíz Temas selectos 1era Ed Editorial Colegio de Postgraduados, Mundi-Prensa México 29–45. http://blog.fundacioncolpos.org/?projects=el-cultivo-del-maiz-temas-selectos-vol-1
SAS (2014) Statistical analysis system. SAS Institute, Cary
SEMARNAT (2002) NOM-021-RECNAT-2000, Norma Oficial Mexicana 2000. México D.F
Sogn TA, Dragicevic I, Linjordet R, Krogstad T, Eijsink VGH, Eich-Greatorex S (2018) Recycling of biogas digestates in plant production: NPK fertilizer value and risk of leaching. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 7:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-017-0188-0
Soria Fregoso MDJ, Ferrera Cerrato R, Etchevers Barra J, Alcántar González G, Trinidad Santos J, Borges Gómez L, Pereyda Pérez G (2001) Producción de biofertilizantes mediante biodigestión de excreta líquida de cerdo. Terra Latinoam 19. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57319408
Torres D, Rivero D, Rodríguez N, Yendis H, Lobo D, Gabriels D, Zamora F (2008) Efectos de un acondicionador sintético (Terracottem®) y un acondicionador orgánico (Bocaschi) sobre la eficiencia del uso de agua en el cultivo del pimentón. Agron Trop 58:277–287. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2797358
Walsh JJ, Jones DL, Edwards-Jones G, Williams AP (2012) Replacing inorganic fertilizer with anaerobic digestate may maintain agricultural productivity at less environmental cost. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 175:840–845. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201200214
Acknowledgements
The funding was provided by Colegio de Postgraduados.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Chontal, M.A.H., Collado, C.J.L., Orozco, N.R. et al. Nutrient content of fermented fertilizers and its efficacy in combination with hydrogel in Zea mays L.. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricult 8, 309–315 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-019-0248-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-019-0248-8