Abstract
In order to assess the role of Agrobacterium rhizogenes rol genes on the defence response of plants to pathogens, tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) were transformed with the rolA gene. Consistently with previous descriptions of rolA-induced phenotype, insertion of this gene had a pleiotropic effect determining highly aberrant plants, with wrinkled, intensely green leaves, thick stems and small fruits often lacking seeds. Infection of transgenic plants with the phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici showed the acquirement of resistance/tolerance to the pathogen as evaluated both on the primary transformants by electrolyte leakage and on the transgenic progenies by direct infection. Determination of the endogenous levels of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and abscisic acid (ABA) showed a 30–35 % decrease of both phytohormones in rolA plants harbouring three copies of the transgene compared to the controls, while a significantly lower level of ABA was observed in plants with one copy of the transgene. This is the first demonstration of the direct involvement of rolA gene in plant pathogen tolerance acquisition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The soil bacterium Agrobacterium rhizogenes is the causal agent of hairy root disease in Dicotyledons. A central role in pathogenesis is ascribed to the rol oncogenes (rolA, B, C and D) carried on the Ri plasmid, which are transferred to the plant cell and are essential for hairy root production (Costantino et al. 1994; Nilsson and Olsson 1997).
The rolD gene encodes the enzyme ornithine cyclodeaminase involved in the biosynthesis of proline (Trovato et al. 2001); the product of the rolB gene has tyrosine phosphatase activity (Filippini et al. 1996), while that of rolC has been proposed to act as a non-specific glucosidase hydrolyzing plant cell walls and releasing oligosaccharides (Faiss et al. 1996). No clear indication is yet available concerning the possible role of the rolA gene, encoding a small (11.4 kDa) basic protein with no significant sequence homology to known proteins (Vilaine et al. 1998; Ridgen and Carneiro 1999). Based on the currently available experimental evidence more functions can be proposed for the rolA gene. Its biochemical characteristics initially led to the hypothesis that RolA could regulate gene expression in response to auxins (Vansuyt et al. 1992). In accordance with these results, Ridgen and Carneiro (1999) using comparative protein modelling found that the RolA protein sequence adopted the same folding as the bovine papillomavirus-1 E2 DNA-binding domain, and in preliminary in vitro experiments observed binding of a rolA-GST fusion protein to DNA. On the other hand, in tobacco plants expressing a rolA::GUS translational fusion GUS activity was associated with the plasmalemma fraction, suggesting that RolA could be be a non-integral, plasmalemma-associated protein (Vilaine et al. 1998). Subsequently, Barros et al. (2003) reported a 50-fold increase of beta-glucoronidase (GUS) activity in transformed tobacco leaf extract expressing GUS and RolA as a fusion protein. The study revealed that RolA could have a role in protection from proteolysis and proposed that it interfered with the protein degradation pathway. The resulting increase in protein stability could extend the duration of RolA effect in the plant.
Transformation with rolA of different plant species produces a pleiotropic phenotype characterized by wrinkled, intensely green leaves, reduced height and root system, decreased flower number and sterility (van Altvorst et al. 1992; Schmülling et al. 1993; Holefors et al. 1998; Zia et al. 2010). rolA, even if in a less severe form than rolB, also induces in vitro root formation in some plant cells and tissues (Spena et al. 1987; Vilaine et al. 1998).
The observed phenotypic modifications suggest alterations in metabolism and/or sensitivity to different phytoregulators. rolA-transgenic plants and tissues have in fact shown enhanced sensitivity to auxins (Maurel et al. 1991; van Altvorst et al. 1992), altered gibberellin content (Dehio et al. 1993; Schmülling et al. 1993; Moritz and Schmülling 1998) and polyamines metabolism (Sun et al. 1991; Altabella et al. 1995; Ben-Hayyim et al. 1996). The rolA gene also appears to influence secondary metabolism: in transgenic tobacco root cultures nicotine production is increased (Palazón et al. 1997), and in transgenic Rubia cordifolia calli a higher anthraquinone production with respect to control has been observed (Shkryl et al. 2008).
rol genes have been investigated concerning their role in pathogen response. In tomato the insertion of the rolD gene led to an increased competence for active defence, as shown by the acquirement of Fusarium toxin tolerance and the enhanced expression of the systemic acquired resistance marker gene PR-1 (Bettini et al. 2003). The rolB and rolC genes have been proposed to activate plant defence reactions by modulating intracellular ROS levels, stress resistance of transformed cells and inhibition of programmed cell death (Bulgakov et al. 2013). Arshad et al. (2014) have recently shown that tomato plants transformed with the rolB gene display foliar resistance to the fungal pathogens Fusarium oxysporum and Alternaria solani that could be due to an increase in the content of secondary metabolites, especially phenolics.
The present paper describes the effect of rolA on the interaction between tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and the phytopathogenic fungus F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici race 0. Fusarium wilt is one of the most destructive diseases of tomato, causing severe damage and crop losses (Agrios 2005). The fungus lives in soil and infects the plant through the root system. The growth of the mycelium inside the vascular system leads to plant colonization and determines the typical wilting symptoms. Fusarium also produces a non specific toxin, fusaric acid, whose effects on plant cells and tissues include alteration of membrane permeability, increase of electrolyte leakage, production of reactive oxygen species and induction of phytoalexin synthesis (Marrè et al. 1993; Bouizgarne et al. 2006).
The tomato cultivar Tondino has been transformed with the rolA gene and the acquirement of resistance/tolerance to F. oxysporum has been evaluated both on the primary transformants by ion leakage and on the transgenic progenies by direct infection with the pathogen.
Materials and methods
Bacterial and fungal strains and media
Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 harbouring the Agrobacterium rhizogenes rolA gene under the control of its own promoter was grown at 28 °C in YEB medium supplemented with 50 μg ml−1 rifampicin and 100 μg ml−1 kanamycin. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici race 0 isolate “Cesena” (kindly provided by SAIS, Cesena, Forlì, Italy) was grown on Potato Dextrose Agar medium (BD Difco™) at 23 ± 1 °C, photoperiod 12 h light-12 h dark.
Plant material
Tomato plants of cultivar Tondino, susceptible to F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (kindly provided by Petoseed Italy), transgenic for rolA gene were obtained as described in Bettini et al. (2003). Transgenic and control micropropagated plants were grown in vitro at 25 ± 1 °C with a 16 h light-8 h dark photoperiod. The first generation transgenic plants and the corresponding untransformed in vitro-regenerated controls were transferred to a containment greenhouse for morphological analysis and self-fertilization.
Molecular analysis
DNA from plant leaves was extracted using the “Nucleospin Plant II” kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH and Co. KG). The presence of the inserted gene was assessed by PCR with the following primers: rolA forward 5’-GTTTATCGCTCGTCTGTTCT-3’ and rolA reverse 5’-GTATTTGTCTATCTTTCTCGC-3’. An amplification with primers for a β-1,3-glucanase gene (GenBank Accession no. M80608) was always carried out in order to verify the correct amplification of the samples. The sequence of the primers was glu forward 5′-ATTGTTGGGTTTTTGAGGGAT-3′ and glu reverse 5′-TTTAGGTTGTATTTTGGCTGC-3′. Amplifications were carried out on 500 ng genomic DNA with 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.5 μM primers and 1 unit of Taq polymerase (DreamTaq, Fermentas Thermo Scientific Molecular Biology Inc.) in a PTC-200 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.). Copy number of the inserted gene was determined by inverse PCR (iPCR) as described by Does et al. (1991). In short, genomic DNA was digested with the restriction endonuclease TaqI, circularized by ligation and linearized again by digestion with three different enzymes, MstII, SspI and SstII. The junction fragments, i.e. the sequences of the plant genomic DNA flanking the known T-DNA sequences, were then amplified by PCR with primers designed on the sequence of the construct (nopaline synthase 5′ regulatory region and neomycin phosphotransferase II gene, respectively).
RNA extractions from plant leaves were carried out using the “Nucleospin RNA Plant” kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH and Co. KG). RT-PCR for the analysis of transgene expression was performed with the “Titan One Tube RT-PCR System” (Roche Applied Science) with the following primers: rolA1 forward 5′-TAAGCTTGTTAGGCGTGCAA-3′ and rolA1 reverse 5′-AATCCCGTAGGTTTGTTTCG-3′. Control amplifications lacking the reverse transcriptase enzyme were always included to confirm the absence of contaminating DNA.
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was carried out according to Salvianti et al. (2008). Five-hundred ng of total RNA were reverse transcribed (TaqMan Reverse Transcription Reagents, Applied Biosystems by Life Technologies) in a final volume of 25 μl and 2 μl of the reaction were then amplified with either rolA1 or 18S rDNA gene primers. Primers for 18S amplification were as follows: 18S forward 5′-AATGATTAACAGGGACAGTCG-3′ and 18S reverse 5′-ACCTTGTTACGACTTCTCCTT-3′. Ten microliters aliquots of the PCR were finally run on an agarose gel and photographed (Gel Doc 2000, Bio-Rad Laboratories). ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) analysis was performed to evaluate the amount of rolA transcript level by normalization with the 18S rDNA transcript. Statistical significance of the observed differences was evaluated with the Student’s t test.
Electrolyte leakage
Electrolyte leakage measurements were carried out as described (Storti et al. 1992), with minor modifications. One gram of leaf disks (7 mm diameter) from four leaves of four different Tondino plants, transgenic plants or untransformed regenerated controls (0.25 g/plant) was incubated in 25 ml of a 37 g 1−1 sucrose solution supplemented or not with 5 mM fusaric acid (Sigma Aldrich). Conductivity was measured with a digital conductivity meter (Top Tronic X74174) every 2 min for 60 min.
Extraction and quantification of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and abscisic acid (ABA)
Determination of IAA and ABA levels in the primary rolA-2 and rolA-23 transformants and the corresponding controls was carried out as previously described (Baraldi et al. 1995; Bettini et al. 2010). Phytohormone amounts were determined from at least triplicate samples. Statistical significance of the observed differences was determined with the Tukey test.
Infection with F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici race 0 and statistical analysis
Selected second-generation rolA-2 and rolA-23 transgenic plants, the corresponding controls and seed-derived cultivar Tondino were infected with F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and screened for symptom development. Fifteen day-old cotyledonary plantlets (20/genotype) were infected under controlled conditions by immersion of the rooting apparatus into a fungal suspension (1.5 × 106 conidia ml−1), while between five and ten uninfected plants were used as a positive control. Before immersion into the conidial suspension, the roots were cut to facilitate fungal entry. Symptoms were evaluated 15, 30 and 40 days after inoculation by dividing the plants in three classes: healthy, with green cotyledons and true leaves; diseased, with yellow, wilting cotyledons; dead. A Disease Index (DI) was calculated by assigning a value of zero to healthy plants, one to diseased plants and two to dead plants; this value was then multiplied by the number of plants of each progeny having the same value. The resulting values were finally divided by the total number of plants of the progeny. All the infection experiments were performed in two replicates. Significance of the observed differences was evaluated by Tukey test with the PAST 3.x software (Hammer et al. 2001).
Results
Molecular and morpho-physiological analysis of primary transformants
Five-hundred eighty cotyledons of 11 day-old Solanum lycopersicum cv. Tondino plantlets were used for transformation with the A. rhizogenes rolA gene. Regeneration frequencies were 12.3 % for the transformation with rolA and 35.5 % for the untransformed controls. The primary regenerants obtained were micropropagated and the presence and the expression of the inserted gene assessed by PCR and RT-PCR, respectively. The transgene was found in all the clones analysed, but was expressed only in some of them possibly due to different landing sites in the tomato genome. Results obtained for 6 transgenic clones (rolA-1, rolA-2, rolA-6, rolA-9, rolA-12 and rolA-23) are reported in Fig. 1 a, b. Further analysis to determine transgene copy number was performed, showing that the transgenic plants had one to three rolA copies (Fig. 1 c). The presence of only one amplification product on the MstII fragment of the rolA-1 clone was probably due to the presence of a MstII site between the genomic TaqI site and one of the copies of the integrated T-DNA. The transgenic clones rolA-1, rolA-2 and rolA-23 having different transgene copy number, and the corresponding untransformed, in vitro-regenerated controls (four clones) were multiplied by vegetative propagation. Ten plantlets from each transgenic clone, three for each of the untransformed controls and ten seed-derived plants of the cultivar Tondino were then transferred to a containment greenhouse for morphological analysis and self-fertilization.
Consistently with previous descriptions of rolA-transformed tomato plants (van Altvorst et al. 1992), all the transgenic plants were highly aberrant with wrinkled, intensely green leaves, thick stems and small fruits often lacking seeds (Fig. 2 ). Expression levels were evaluated by semi-quantitative RT-PCR on the rolA-23 and rolA-2 clones, having one and three copies of the transgene, respectively, and exhibiting the strongest phenotypic differences. Results (Fig. 3 ) showed a direct correlation among transgene copy number, increased expression level and plant severity.
Electrolyte leakage
To investigate whether insertion of the rolA gene could affect the defence response to F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, electrolyte leakage in the presence of fusaric acid was evaluated on the primary transformants rolA-1, rolA-2 and rolA-23, the corresponding control clones 1 and 9 and seed-derived Tondino plants. Results (Fig. 4) showed that all the transgenic clones exhibited a higher level of tolerance to the toxin when compared to the untransformed regenerated controls, whose susceptibility to fusaric acid was even higher than that of seed-derived Tondino plants. The rolA-23 clone appeared to be the most resistant to fusaric acid.
Levels of endogenous IAA and ABA in the apical shoots
The clone rolA-2, harbouring three copies of the transgene, showed a significant 30–35 % decrease in the amount of both phytohormones compared to controls, while the clone rolA-23 (one copy) was characterized by only a significantly lower level of ABA (Table 1).
Infection with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici
Our previous molecular PCR analyses had found a direct correlation between aberrant phenotype and presence of rolA insertion (data not shown). Consequently, transgenic plants were identified in the progenies by selecting the ones with aberrant phenotype. These plants and untransformed regenerated controls were infected with F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici race 0 as described in Materials and Methods. Analysis was performed by calculating for each sample the average DI at different time points (15–30–40 d after infection) (Fig. 5). Up to 30 d after infection both rolA-23 and rolA-2 plants showed a level of tolerance to Fusarium significantly higher than the controls as the average DI 30 d after the infection was respectively 0.47 and 0.78 for the transgenic plants, being 1.02 for the untransformed control individuals. However, 40 d after the infection only rolA-23 maintained a higher tolerance to the fungus, as the DI for rolA-2 was not significantly different from that of the controls.
Discussion
The insertion of the rolA gene in tomato plants increased the level of tolerance to F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici both on the primary transformants and on the transgenic progeny. In a preliminary screening by electrolyte leakage the primary transformants were found to be resistant to the toxic effect of fusaric acid, with the clone rolA-23 clearly more responsive (Fig. 4). In accordance, direct infection of the transgenic progeny showed increased tolerance to the pathogen: even if not completely, the introduction of rolA increased up to twice plant protection from Fusarium challenge (Fig. 5). To our knowledge, this is the first report describing a contribution of rolA gene in plant resistance by direct pathogen infection.
The present hypotheses on rolA function do not allow to explain the observed defense promotion. However, as previously described in the Introduction, the other rol genes, B, C and D have already been known to be involved in defense mechanisms. For example, in potato tuber discs rolC promotes a reduction in the infection level of phytopathogenic fungi (Fladung and Gieffers 1993), and in tomato rolB induces fungal tolerance by increasing the amount of total phenolics (Arshad et al. 2014).
The study shows that in transgenic plants a direct correlation between gene copy number, expression level and severity of the phenotype could be established, while the same is not true when pathogen tolerance is taken into account. As high level expression of rolA in rolA-2 plants determined extreme severity showing a reduced fitness, so we can suggest that it could interfere with the complete deployment of defense response.
Fusarium-tolerant plants had a reduced amount of ABA with respect to controls (Table 1). Abscisic acid, known as a relevant player in abiotic stress tolerance (Tuteja 2007), in recent evidence also showed a prominent role in biotic stress where it acted as a negative regulator of disease resistance (Anderson et al. 2004; Robert-Seilaniantz et al. 2011). In particular, in tomato an increased concentration of ABA promoted fungal and bacterial infection (Audenaert et al. 2002; de Torres-Zabala et al. 2007; Asselbergh et al. 2008). These studies are in agreement with our results on rolA plants, and could have important agricultural implications because abiotic stress induces ABA accumulation, which in turn may result in enhanced susceptibility to pathogens. Moreover, in tomato ABA-deficient mutants had reduced plant growth and fruit size (Nitsch et al. 2012), confirming that endogenous ABA influenced growth promotion (Sharp et al. 2000; Finkelstein et al. 2002). Thus, the phenotype of rolA tomato plants, having a reduced ABA concentration, was in agreement with that of ABA-deficient mutant plants of the above mentioned study.
Indole-3-acetic acid level, even if reduced in both clones, was significantly lower in rolA-2 plants which were less tolerant to Fusarium infection. In the banana-F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense, tomato-F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and barley-Fusarium culmorum interactions the exogenous application of IAA increased plant resistance to the pathogen (Fernández-Falcón et al. 2003; Sharaf and Farrag 2004; Petti et al. 2012). A lower IAA content could therefore be one of the factors determining the decreased level of tolerance observed in rolA-2.
As previously reported by Schmülling et al. (1993) in tobacco, also our data showed indirect evidence that gibberellin was decreased in rolA plants. The germination percentage for the clone rolA-23 was in fact 5 % for untreated and 66 % for seeds treated with GA3. Gibberellin partially works in limiting pathogen effects: genetic study showed a reduced fungal colonization in mutants that are impaired in gibberellin synthesis (Schäfer et al. 2009).
Phytohormones are known to exert their action on plant growth and development in a defined range of endogenous concentrations (Bradford and Trewavas 1994). The same could be true for their effect on the defense response, where an amount of phytoregulators above or below a given threshold could alter plant fitness creating a condition for the deployment or not of resistance.
rol genes also promote secondary metabolite production that, even if not essential for cell survival, is often involved and/or stimulated in defense processes (Walton 2001). In rolA plants the enhanced biosynthesis of secondary metabolites such as nicotine and anthraquinones, having known antimicrobial and insect-repellent activities (Godard et al. 2008; Kremer et al. 2012; Mithöfer and Boland 2012), could also contribute to the defence response.
Finally the rolA gene is also expressed in A. rhizogenes, driven by a specific prokaryotic promoter corresponding to a spliceosomal intron (Pandolfini et al. 2000). In the bacterium rolA is preferentially active during stationary growth, suggesting a rolA function on high cell density (Pandolfini et al. 2000). This condition is characterised by the transcription of genes involved in long-term survival and in the protection against pH, H2O2, high osmolarity, UV, drought, and nutrient starvation (Loewen and Hennge-Aronis 1994; Thorne and Williams 1997). The presence of rolA expression in bacteria in stressing growth status strengthens its role also in the plant defense response.
The study shows that the rolA gene, in addition to conferring pathogen tolerance, pleiotropically affects plant phenotype and phytohormone content of tomato plants. Further studies are therefore required to assess the possible correlations between one or more metabolic effects of rolA and pathogen tolerance, and if any of the observed modifications could affect other agronomically important traits.
Abbreviations
- ABA:
-
abscisic acid
- IAA:
-
indole-3-acetic acid
- PCR:
-
polymerase chain reaction
- RT-PCR:
-
reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
References
Agrios GN (2005) Vascular wilts caused by ascomycetes and deuteromycetes (mitosporic fungi). In: Agrios GN (ed) Plant Pathology, 5th edn. Elsevier Academic Press, New York, pp. 522–530
Altabella T, Angel E, Biondi S, Palazón J, Bagni N, Pinol MT (1995) Effect of the rol genes from Agrobacterium rhizogenes on polyamine metabolism in tobacco roots. Physiol Plant 95:479–485. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb00866.x
Anderson JP, Badruzsaufari E, Schenk PM, Manners JM, Desmond OJ, Ebert C, Kazan K (2004) Antagonistic interaction between abscisic acid and jasmonate-ethylene signaling pathways modulates defence gene expression and disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16:3460–3479. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.025833
Arshad W, Haq I, Tahir Waheed M, Mysore KS, Mirza B (2014) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato with rolB gene results in enhancement of fruit quality and foliar resistance against fungal pathogens. PLoS ONE 9(5):e96979. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096979
Asselbergh B, Enow Achuo A, Höfte M, Van Gijsegem F (2008) Abscisic acid deficiency leads to rapid activation of tomato defence responses upon infection with Erwinia chrysanthemi. Mol Plant Pathol 9:11–24. doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00437.x
Audenaert K, De Meyer GB, Höfte MM (2002) Abscisic acid determines basal susceptibility of tomato to Botrytis cinerea and suppresses salicylic acid dependent signaling mechanisms. Plant Physiol 128:491–501. doi:10.1104/pp.010605
Baraldi R, Bertazza G, Bregoli A, Fasolo F, Rotondi A, Predieri S, Serafini-Fracassini D, Slovin JP, Cohen JD (1995) Auxins and polyamines in relation to differential in vitro root induction on microcuttings of two pear cultivars. J Plant Growth Regul 14:49–59. doi:10.1007/BF00212646
Barros LM, Curtis RH, Viana AA, Campos L, Carneiro M (2003) Fused RolA protein enhances beta glucoronidase activity 50-fold: implication for RolA mechanism of action. Protein Peptide Lett 10:303–311. doi:10.2174/0929866033478951
Ben-Hayyim G, Martin-Tanguy J, Tepfer D (1996) Changing root and shoot architecture with the rolA gene from Agrobacterium rhizogenes: interactions with gibberellic acid and polyamine metabolism. Physiol Plant 96:237–243. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb00208.x
Bettini P, Michelotti S, Bindi D, Giannini R, Capuana M, Buiatti M (2003) Pleiotropic effect of the insertion of the Agrobacterium rhizogenes rolD gene in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Theor Appl Genet 107:831–836. doi:10.1007/s00122-003-1322-0
Bettini PP, Baraldi R, Rapparini F, Melani L, Mauro ML, Bindi D, Buiatti M (2010) The insertion of the Agrobacterium rhizogenes rolC gene in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) affects plant architecture and endogenous auxin and abscisic acid levels. Sci Hort 123:323–328. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2009.09.013
Bouizgarne B, El-Maarouf-Bouteau H, Frankart C, Reboutier D, Madiona K, Pennarun AM, Monestiez M, Trouverie J, Amiar Z, Briand J, Brault M, Rona JP, Ouhdouch Y, El Hadrami I, Bouteau F (2006) Early physiological response of Arabidopsis thaliana cells to fusaric acid: toxic and signalling effects. New Phytol 169:209–218. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01561.x
Bradford KJ, Trewavas AJ (1994) Sensitivity thresholds and variable time scales in plant hormone action. Plant Physiol 105:1029–1036
Bulgakov VP, Shkryl YN, Veremeichik GN, Gorpenchenko TY, Vereshchagina YV (2013) Recent advances in the understanding of Agrobacterium rhizogenes-derived genes and their effects on stress resistance and plant metabolism. Adv Biochem Engin Biotechnol 134:1–22. doi:10.1007/10_2013_179
Costantino P, Capone I, Cardarelli M, De Paolis A, Mauro ML, Trovato M (1994) Bacterial plant oncogenes: the rol genes' saga. Genetica 94:203–211. doi:10.1007/BF01443434
Dehio C, Grossmann K, Schell J, Schmülling T (1993) Phenotype and hormonal status of transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing the rolA gene of Agrobacterium rhizogenes TL-DNA. Plant Mol Biol 23:1199–1210. doi:10.1007/BF00042353
de Torres-Zabala M, Truman W, Bennett MH, Lafforgue G, Mansfield JW, Rodriguez Egea P, Bogre L, Grant M (2007) Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato hijacks the Arabidopsis abscisic acid signalling pathway to cause disease. EMBO J 26:1434–1443. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601575
Does MP, Dekker BMM, de Groot MJA, Offringa R (1991) A quick method to estimate the T-DNA copy number in transgenic plants at an early stage after transformation, using inverse PCR. Plant Mol Biol 17:151–153. doi:10.1007/BF00036819
Faiss M, Strnad M, Rédig P, Dolezal K, Hanus J, Van Onckelen H, Schmülling T (1996) Chemically induced expression of the rolC-encoded β-glucosidase in transgenic tobacco plants and analysis of cytokinin metabolism: rolC does not hydrolyze endogenous cytokinin glucosides in planta. Plant J 10:33–46. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10010033.x
Fernández-Falcón M, Borges AA, Borges-Pérez A (2003) Induced resistance to Fusarium wilt of banana by exogenous application of indoleacetic acid. Phytoprotection 84:149–153. doi:10.7202/008492ar
Filippini F, Rossi V, Marin O, Trovato M, Costantino P, Downey PM, Lo Schiavo F, Terzi M (1996) A plant oncogene as a phosphatase. Nature 379:499–500. doi:10.1038/379499a0
Finkelstein RR, Gampala SSL, Rock CD (2002) Abscisic acid signalling in seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell 14:S15–S45. doi:10.1105/tpc.010441
Fladung M, Gieffers W (1993) Resistance reactions of leaves and tubers of rolC transgenic tetraploid potato to bacterial and fungal pathogens. Correlation with sugar, starch and chlorophyll content. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 42:123–132. doi:10.1006/pmpp.1993.1010
Godard S, Slacanin I, Viret O, Gindro K (2008) Induction of defence mechanisms in grapevine leaves by emodin- and anthraquinone-rich plant extracts and their conferred resistance to downy mildew. Plant Physiol Biochem 47:827–837. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.04.003
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:1e9
Holefors A, Xue Z-T, Welander M (1998) Transformation of the apple rootstock M26 with the rolA gene and its influence on growth. Plant Sci 136:69–78. doi:10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00106-X
Kremer D, Kosalec I, Locatelli M, Epifano F, Genovese S, Carlucci G, Zovko Koncic M (2012) Anthraquinone profiles, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of Frangula rupestris (Scop.) and Frangula alnus Mill. bark. Food Chem 131:1174–1180. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.09.094
Loewen PC, Hennge-Aronis R (1994) The role of the sigma factor σS (KatF) in bacterial global regulation. Annu Rev Microbiol 48:53–80. doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.000413
Marrè MT, Vergani P, Albergoni FC (1993) Relationship between fusaric acid uptake and its binding to cell structures by leaves of Egeria densa and its toxic effects on membrane permeability and respiration. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 42:141–157. doi:10.1006/pmpp.1993.1012
Maurel C, Barbier-Brygoo H, Spena A, Tempé J, Guern J (1991) Single rol genes from the Agrobacterium rhizogenes TL-DNA alter some of the cellular responses to auxin in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Physiol 97:212–216. doi: 10.1104/pp.97.1.212
Mithöfer A, Boland W (2012) Plant defense against herbivores: chemical aspects. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63:431–450. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103854
Moritz T, Schmülling T (1998) The gibberellin content of rolA transgenic tobacco plants is specifically altered. J Plant Physiol 153:774–776. doi:10.1016/S0176-1617(98)80234-4
Nilsson O, Olsson O (1997) Getting to the root: the role of the Agrobacterium rhizogenes rol genes in the formation of hairy roots. Physiol Plant 100:463–473. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb03050.x
Nitsch L, Kohlen W, Oplaat C, Charnikhova T, Cristescu S, Michieli P, Wolters-Arts M, Bouwmeester H, Mariani C, Vriezen WH, Rieu I (2012) ABA-deficiency results in reduced plant and fruit size in tomato. J Plant Physiol 169:878–883. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2012.02.004
Palazón J, Cusido RM, Roig C, Piñol MT (1997) Effect of rol genes from Agrobacterium rhizogenes TL-DNA on nicotine production in tobacco root cultures. Plant Physiol Biochem 35:155–162
Pandolfini T, Storlazzi A, Calabria E, Defez R, Spena A (2000) The spliceosomal intron of the rolA gene of Agrobacterium rhizogenes is a prokaryotic promoter. Mol Microbiol 35:1326–1334. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01810.x
Petti C, Reiber K, Ali SS, Berney M, Doohan FM (2012) Auxin as a player in the biocontrol of Fusarium head blight disease of barley and its potential as a disease control agent. BMC Plant Biol 12:224. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-224
Ridgen DJ, Carneiro M (1999) A structural model for the rolA protein and its interaction with DNA. Proteins 37:697–708. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19991201)37:4<697::AID-PROT18>3.0.CO;2-Y
Robert-Seilaniantz A, Grant M, Jones JDG (2011) Hormone crosstalk in plant disease and defence: more than just JASMONATE-SALICYLATE antagonism. Annu Rev Phytopathol 49:317–343. doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114447
Salvianti F, Bettini PP, Giordani E, Sacchetti P, Bellini E, Buiatti M (2008) Identification by suppression subtractive hybridization of genes expressed in pear (Pyrus spp.) upon infestation with Cacopsylla pyri (Homoptera: Psyllidae). J Plant Physiol 165:1808–1816. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2007.12.010
Schäfer P, Pfiffi S, Voll LM, Zajic D, Chandler PM, Waller F, Scholtz U, Pons-Kühnemann J, Sonnewald S, Sonnewald U, Kogel K-H (2009) Manipulation of plant innate immunity and gibberellin as factor of compatibility in the mutualistic association of barley roots with Piriformospora indica. Plant J 59:461–474. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03887.x
Schmülling T, Fladung M, Grossmann K, Schell J (1993) Hormonal content and sensitivity of transgenic tobacco and potato plants expressing single rol genes of Agrobacterium rhizogenes T-DNA. Plant J 3:371–382. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.t01-20-00999.x
Sharaf EF, Farrag AA (2004) Induced resistance in tomato plants by IAA against Fusarium oxysporum lycopersici. Pol J Microbiol 53:111–116
Sharp RE, LeNoble M, Else MA, Thorne ET, Gherardi F (2000) Endogenous ABA maintains shoot growth in tomato independently of effects on plant water balance: evidence for an interaction with ethylene. J Exp Bot 51:1575–1584. doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.350.1575
Shkryl YN, Veremeichik GN, Bulgakov VP, Tchernoded GK, Mischenko NP, Fedoreyev SA, Zhuravlev YN (2008) Individual and combined effects of the rolA, B, and C genes on anthraquinone producution in Rubia cordifolia transformed calli. Biotechnol Bioeng 100:118–125. doi:10.1002/bit.21727
Spena A, Schmülling T, Koncz C, Schell JS (1987) Independent and synergistic activity of rolA, B and C loci in stimulating abnormal growth in plants. EMBO J 6:3891–3899
Storti E, Latil C, Salti S, Bettini P, Bogani P, Pellegrini MG, Simeti C, Molnar A, Buiatti M (1992) The in vitro physiological phenotype of tomato resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Theor Appl Genet 84:123–128. doi:10.1007/BF00223991
Sun L-Y, Monneuse M-O, Martin-Tanguy J, Tepfer D (1991) Changes in flowering and the accumulation of polyamines and hydroxycinnamic acid-polyamine conjugates in tobacco plants transformed by the rolA locus from the Ri TL-DNA of Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Plant Sci 80:145–156. doi:10.1016/0168-9452(91)90279-H
Thorne SH, Williams HD (1997) Adaptation to nutrient starvation in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli: analysis of survival, stress resistance, and changes in macromolecular synthesis during entry and exit from stationary phase. J Bacteriol 181:981–990
Trovato M, Maras B, Linhares F, Costantino P (2001) The plant oncogene rolD encodes a functional ornithine cyclodeaminase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:13449–13453. doi:10.1073/pnas.231320398
Tuteja N (2007) Abscisic acid and abiotic stress signaling. Plant Signal Behav 2:135–138. doi:10.4161/psb.2.3.4156
van Altvorst AC, Bino RJ, van Dijk AJ, Lamers AMJ, Lindhout WH, van der Mark F, Dons JJM (1992) Effects of the introduction of Agrobacterium rhizogenes rol genes on tomato plant and flower development. Plant Sci 83:77–85. doi:10.1016/0168-9452(92)90064-S
Vansuyt G, Vilaine F, Tepfer M, Rossignol M (1992) rolA modulates the sensitivity to auxin of the proton translocation catalyzed by the plasma membrane H + −ATPase in transformed tobacco. FEBS Lett 298:89–92. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(92)80028-F
Vilaine F, Rembur J, Chriqui D, Tepfer M (1998) Modified development in transgenic tobacco plants expressing a rolA::GUS translational fusion and subcellular localization of the fusion protein. Mol Plant-Microbe In 11:855–859. doi:10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.9.855
Walton JD (2001) Secondary metabolites: killing pathogens. eLS 1-5. doi:10.1038/npg.els.0000917
Zia M, Mirza B, Malik SA, Chaudhary MF (2010) Expression of rol genes in transgenic soybean (Glycine max L.) leads to changes in plant phenotype, leaf morphology, and flowering time. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 103:227–236. doi:10.1007/s11240-010-9771-z
Acknowledgments
Authors are grateful to Prof. Aniello Scala (Dipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Agroalimentari e dell’Ambiente, University of Florence, Italy) for helpful discussion and critical reading of the manuscript. Riccardo Innocenti (Dipartimento di Biologia, University of Florence, Italy) is acknowledged for photographic work on transgenic plants. Research supported by grants from Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca, Progetto Nazionale di Ricerca “Biotecnologie Avanzate”, Tema 4 to PPB, ES, RB, FR, PM, PC; from Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali, project “Protezione delle piante mediante l’uso di marcatori molecolari” (PROMAR) to PPB, RB, FR; from Progetto Ateneo Sapienza Università di Roma to Prof. Maria Maddalena Altamura and MLM.
Conflict of interest
Authors P. P. Bettini, R. Baraldi and F. Rapparini have received research grants from Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca and Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali. Authors E. Santangelo, P. Mosconi and P. Crinò have received research grant from Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca. Author M. L. Mauro has received research grant from Progetto Ateneo Sapienza Università di Roma.
Author contribution statement
P. P. Bettini obtained the transgenic plants, carried out phenotypic analysis and self-fertilization, performed molecular analysis and ion leakage experiments, and wrote the paper. R. Baraldi and F. Rapparini carried out the determination of ABA and IAA levels and revised the manuscript. E. Santangelo, P. Mosconi and P. Crinò performed the infection experiment, collected and analyzed the data and revised the manuscript. M. L. Mauro obtained the construct with the Agrobacterium rhizogenes rolA gene in the appropriate Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain for transformation and wrote the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bettini, P.P., Santangelo, E., Baraldi, R. et al. Agrobacterium rhizogenes rolA gene promotes tolerance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in transgenic tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 25, 225–233 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-015-0328-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-015-0328-4