1 Introduction

A modern forest biorefining approach includes the opportunity to produce, not only the main product (pulp fiber) but also the value-added green chemicals and various derivatives of cellulose and hemicelluloses; this integration results in an enhanced utilization of feedstocks and a decrease in greenhouse gas emissions [1,2,3]. One of the most promising biorefining techniques, mainly utilized for the partial recovery of carbohydrates, is based on the various pre-treatment processes [4, 5], such as hot-water extraction (HWE, “autohydrolysis”), conducted, for example, prior to delignification [6,7,8,9,10]. By pre-treatments, it is often possible to increase the reactivity of feedstock material leading to enhanced pulping performance and to recover potential by-streams (e.g., lignin and aliphatic carboxylic acids) [11]. However, in each case, a general prerequisite for finding a realizable design concept is that the presence of all the feedstock constituents is taken into account when planning target-oriented, economic processes for the manufacture of useful products [12].

Many studies have been carried out on a wide range of non-wood raw materials that could be used as alternative fibrous materials in many countries [12, 13]. Among the potential feedstocks, agricultural residues, such as wheat straw and okra stalk, offer great potential for lignocellulosic biorefineries due to their relatively high polysaccharide content and minor nutritional value for human consumption. Typically, the major problems in non-wood pulping include (i) silica-based depositions, which inhibit the recovery of chemicals from spent cooking liquor (black liquor) in alkaline pulping processes and (ii) a high amount of fines, which causes drainage problems. Many attempts have been made to solve these problems including HWE of feedstock prior to soda-anthraquinone (soda-AQ) pulping [14]. According to the base case designed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), pre-treatment has a great impact on overall process cost, accounting for up to 33% of the total [15].

HWE conditions are usually monitored by means of the “P-factor” (pre-hydrolysis factor), which is analogous to the “H-factor” used for similar purposes in chemical pulping [16]. It presents the combined overall effect of autohydrolysis time and temperature by a single numerical value calculated by the formula given in Eq. (1),

$$ P={\int}_{t_0}^t Exp\bullet \left(40.48-\frac{\mathrm{15,106}}{T}\right)\bullet dt, $$
(1)

where t is time (h) and T is temperature (K). Creating a relationship between the materials removed from lignocellulosic feedstocks by autohydrolysis and the process variables, such as temperature and time, is essential to determine optimal operation conditions for the production of the desired lignocellulosic products and to allow a comparison of operations carried out under different conditions.

The aim of this work was to study the influence of HWE of wheat straw and okra stalk under varying conditions on the performance of soda-AQ pulping to clarify their potential for integrated biorefining. Huge amount of okra plant stem is discarded on the field annually after collecting vegetable, without proper utilization. So far, no studies have been conducted concerning HWE of okra stalk (after removing the pods), which actually is an important agricultural feedstock in certain countries. The total land area to produce okra has been reported to be almost 2 million hectares [17]. Recently, the maximum above ground biomass yield of okra whole plant is 120 t ha−1, and only stalk has been shown to be as high as 73 t ha−1 [18]. On the other hand, common wheat is widely cultivated for its seed (a cereal grain), and wheat straw was included in this study as a “reference feedstock.” The effect of different treatment conditions on the chemical composition of HWE hydrolysates was also investigated, and the potential utilization of these hydrolysates as feedstocks for biorefining was briefly discussed.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Raw materials

Wheat straw (Triticum aestivum) of Finnish origin and okra stalk (Abelmoschus esculentus) of Pakistani origin were used in the laboratory-scale HWE experiments. The used wheat straw was manually screened, and straw samples having leaves, nodes, and other visible impurities were removed. In the case of okra stalk, only nodes were removed. The air-dried wheat straw and okra stalk were cut into a length range from 3 to 5 cm. The untreated and hot-water-extracted feedstocks were then used for the laboratory-scale alkaline cooking experiments.

2.2 Hot-water pre-treatments

HWEs were carried out in 1.25-L rotating stainless steel reactors (heated in a decene bath; CRS Autoclave System 420, Stenkullen, Sweden, Fig. 1S in supplementary files), each charged with 80 g of oven-dried (o.d.) raw material. Pre-treatments were performed at maximum temperatures of 140 and 150 °C having treatment times of 60 and 240, and 25 and 100 min, respectively (Table 1). A heating-up time of 30 min was added to the total treatment times. The liquor-to-raw material ratio was 5 L kg−1. At the end of each pre-treatment, reactors were removed from the oil bath and cooled rapidly in cold water. The hydrolysates were separated from the pre-treated feedstocks by filtration bags, and after measuring the pH, they were stored in a freezer for further analyses.

Table 1 Experimental data on hot-water extractions

2.3 Soda-AQ cooks

Laboratory-scale cooking experiments (soda-AQ) were performed with the same reactors that were used for HWEs. One untreated sample from both wheat straw and okra stalk as a reference and two HWE samples treated at 140 °C (P-factor 50) and at 150 °C (P-factor 200) were pulped. Each reactor was loaded with 80 g of raw material, and an AQ charge of 0.05% (w/w) on o.d. feedstock was used. Effective alkali (EA) charge was 15% by weight on o.d. feedstock for wheat straw and okra stalk 1 and 20% by weight on o.d. feedstock for okra stalk 2, respectively, using liquor-to-feedstock ratio 5 L kg−1. At the end of each cook, reactors were removed from the oil bath and cooled rapidly in cold water. The black liquor (BL) was separated from the pulp by pressing and stored in a freezer. The employed cooking parameters and experimental design are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Soda-AQ cooking data on wheat straw and okra stalk feedstocks

The pulp obtained was thoroughly washed with water, and the total pulp yield was calculated on the basis of o.d. initial feedstock. Pulp samples were screened with a 0.2-mm laboratory screening device (a Somerville-type apparatus from Serlachius Oy, Mänttä, Finland), and the amount of “process yield” (HWE + pulping) was determined by taking into account the material removed during HWE and the amount of rejects during pulp screening.

2.4 Analytical determinations

2.4.1 Raw materials

Sampling and preparation of raw materials for compositional analyses were performed according to TAPPI standards T257 cm-02 and T264 cm-07. Dry mass of feedstocks, pre-treated raw materials, and pulps were determined by drying a sample overnight in an oven at 105 °C. Extractives were analyzed using TAPPI standard 280 pm-99. The content of lignin in the extractive-free untreated feedstocks was gravimetrically determined as the sum of “acid-insoluble Klason lignin” and “acid-soluble lignin” according to TAPPI standard T222 om-98. Acid soluble lignin was measured by using a Beckman DU 640 UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Beckman Industries Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA) according to the TAPPI UM 250 method at wavelength 205 nm; the absorptivity value was 110 L g−1 cm−1 [19]. The content of different monosaccharides (i.e., arabinose, galactose, glucose, mannose, and xylose) in Klason hydrolysates was analyzed with a Dionex (Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) [20]. A Dionex CarboPac PA-1 column (250 mm × 4 mm inner diameter (i.d.)) was utilized for the separation at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. Post-column alkali (300 mM NaOH) addition was employed at a flow rate of 0.2 mL min−1 to enhance the performance of PAD. The peak identification and the mass-based calibrations between an internal standard (l-fucose (Fluka Chemical Corp., Seeltze, Germany)) and each monosaccharide were based on separate runs with model monosaccharides (all from Fluka Chemical Corp., Seeltze, Germany). The content of the carbohydrates in acid hydrolysates was calculated and reported as anhydro forms of the measured monosaccharides. In addition, the yield decrease in the monosaccharides (determined separately) during acid hydrolysis caused by different side reactions (e.g., formation of furans) was taken into account. The chemical composition of the non-wood materials is presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Chemical composition of non-wood materials (% of the dry matter)

2.4.2 Hot-water extractions

The total content (after sulfuric acid hydrolysis) of different monosaccharides (i.e., arabinose, galactose, glucose, mannose, and xylose) and free monosaccharides in HWE hydrolysates were analyzed with a Dionex (Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) HPAEC-PAD as described in Sect. 2.4.1.

Volatile acids (i.e., acetic and formic acids) in the HWE hydrolysates were determined using a Dionex IC25 ion chromatograph (IC) [21]. A Dionex IonPac AS 11-HC analytical column (250 mm × 4 mm i.d.) was used at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. Gradient elution was performed by an EG40 eluent generator (KOH/ultra-high purity water). The chromatographic peaks were identified based on the model substances sodium acetate and sodium formate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

Furanoic compounds (furfural and 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural (HMF)) formed during HWE were analyzed by a Hewlett Packard (Palo Alto, CA, USA) 1100 series HPLC equipped with a Phenomenex (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) Gemini C18 column (100 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., with a particle size of 3 μm). The injection volume was 25 μL, and the detection wavelength of the diode array detector (DAD) was 280 nm. Ultra-high quality water/acetonitrile (ACN from J.T. Baker, Deventer, The Netherlands) and pure ACN were chosen as the eluents. The eluent flow rate was 0.8 mL min−1, and a gradient program according to ACN from 5 to 80% in 12 min was used for the elution. The chromatographic peaks were determined based on the model substances furfural and HMF (both from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.4.3 Pulps and soda-AQ black liquors

Screened pulp yields were measured according to TAPPI standard T274 sp-04. The kappa number from the pulps was determined according to TAPPI standard 236 cm-85. The residual alkali of BLs was determined by titrating the diluted and carbonated BL sample to pH 11.5 with 1 M hydrochloric acid solution according to the KCL procedure (number 67a:87). The amount of lignin dissolved during the cooks was calculated based on the difference of lignin contents of the original feedstock and cooked pulp. Volatile acids (see above) in the BLs were analyzed by means of the anion exchange method (Dionex IC) described in Sect. 2.4.2 [21].

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Removal of material during HWEs

The comparison of the effect of HWE on the dry mass yield of wheat straw and okra stalk is presented in Table 1. As can be seen, the higher the P-factor of the pre-extraction process, the higher the mass loss. This material loss in wheat straw during pre-treatment varied from 5.8% (w/w) in the mildest condition (at 140 °C for 60 min) to 12% (w/w) in the harshest condition (at 150 °C for 100 min) and for okra stalk from 14.4% (w/w) (at 140 °C for 60 min) to 23.3% (w/w) (at 150 °C for 100 min). Thus, these results indicated that an increase in the P-factor was proportional to the loss in mass and were in agreement with those reported earlier by Paredes et al. [22]. When aiming at reasonable pulp yields without significant losses in pulp quality properties, the targeted mass losses of 10–15% (w/w) in the HWE stage were obtained at higher P-factors for wheat straw than those for okra stalk. This difference in mass loss between wheat straw and okra stalk clearly suggested that okra is more sensitive to HWE. This increasing extraction efficiency was probably mainly due to the more porous structure of okra stalk than that of wheat straw since their chemical compositions were almost the same [23].

3.2 Hot-water extraction hydrolysates

3.2.1 Carbohydrates

As the HWE conditions became harsher, the formation of mono-, oligo-, and polymeric carbohydrates increased as presented in Tables 1S and 2S (see supplementary files). The amount of total carbohydrates in hydrolysates from okra stalk was almost four times higher than those in the corresponding hydrolysates from wheat straw. An increase in the content of carbohydrates of okra hydrolysates might be due to the partial dissolution of “fluffy material” in the inner stem of okra stalk, which was mainly composed of carbohydrate substances. Figure 1 shows the content of total carbohydrates in the hydrolysates compared to the content of carbohydrates in the initial raw materials. Typically, the highest content of total carbohydrates dissolved both from wheat straw and okra stalk was obtained with a P-factor of 200 (at 150 °C, P-factor 200) which accounted for 6 and 20%, respectively. In addition, it was noted that okra stalk behaved almost like softwood, and in these cases, the content of total carbohydrates in both hydrolysates was almost the same [24]. It could be concluded that the suitability of these carbohydrates, for example, after further enzymatic hydrolysis for the production of a wide-range of platform chemicals (i.e., alcohols, acids, and other products) by fermentation is high [12].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Total content of carbohydrates in wheat straw (left) and okra stalk (right) hydrolysates

3.2.2 Volatile acids and liquor pHs

Figure 2 shows the content of volatile acids in the hydrolysates. The content of these acids increased along with temperature and P-factor; this was mainly due to the deacetylation of hemicelluloses, but partly also due to other enhanced degradation reactions [8, 25]. Thus, the HWE stage led to unwanted side reactions at elevated temperatures similarly to acid hydrolysis, which generally lowered the overall yield recovery of hemicelluloses [26, 27]. In general, higher amount of acetic acid was formed from okra than from corresponding wheat straw samples. These volatile acids are well known and widely utilized industrial chemicals which can be easily separated by distillation and utilized as well-known industrial chemicals.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Volatile acids in wheat straw (left) and okra stalk (right) hydrolysates

The pH of the hydrolysates from the okra stalk (from 4.4 to 4.6) was lower when compared to that of the wheat straw liquors (from 5.0 to 5.6) (Table 1). The pH drop was mainly due to the self-catalyzed acidic hydrolysis of acetyl groups (deacetylation) present in hemicelluloses as well as to the formation of formic acid (i.e., the total amount of volatile acids). The formation of these organic acids also contributed to the cleavage of lignin-carbohydrate bonds, particularly typical for non-woods and promoted the further removal of hydrolysable hemicelluloses [6, 25].

3.2.3 Furans

Figure 3 shows the amount of furans in the wheat straw and okra stalk hydrolysates. The formation of organic acids and the decrease in pH contributed to the partial degradation and removal of hemicelluloses, which were further hydrolyzed to mono- and oligosaccharides [24]. In addition, due to the acidic pre-treatment conditions, some monosaccharides were further degraded into furans [8]. The results indicated that the amount of both HMF (formed from hexosans like glucomannan and cellulose) and furfural (formed from pentosans like xylan and arabinan) increased with the increase in P-factor; the highest content of furans formed from both feedstocks was obtained after harsher pre-treatments conducted at 150 °C with a P-factor of 200. It was also noted that the content of HMF in wheat straw hydrolysates was distinctly lower than that of furfural and that the formation behavior of these components was the opposite in the okra hydrolysates (i.e., HMF was the dominant furanoic compound in the okra hydrolysates). Different carbohydrates that were dissolved during the autohydrolysis from each feedstock could explain these differences; in okra hydrolysates, the main dissolved carbohydrates were hexoses (i.e., glucose, mannose, and galactose), whereas in the wheat straw hydrolysates, pentoses (i.e., xylose and arabinose) were the dominant ones. Additionally, the amount of furans in the hydrolysates from okra stalk was roughly ten times higher when compared to the corresponding wheat straw liquors. This was in agreement with the observation that also the content of dissolved carbohydrates (i.e., the source for furanoic components) was significantly higher in the okra hydrolysates. In some fermentation applications, furans may act as inhibitors and their selective removal should be carried out [24].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Furans in wheat straw (left) and okra stalk (right) hydrolysates

3.3 Soda-AQ pulping

The pre-treated and untreated wheat straw samples resulted in relatively good pulp yields (Fig. 4) during the soda-AQ pulping (EA 15% (w/w), 145 °C, and 15 min, see Table 2), while under these conditions, okra stalk 1 samples were not defibrated at all as indicated by a very low screened yield in Fig. 4. In the case of wheat straw, the total process yields (HWE + pulping) were about 50% (w/w). It should be pointed out that in the case of the pre-treated feedstocks, the pulp yield increased slightly with the increase in temperature and P-factor, but the total process yield decreased to some extent when the effect of HWE was taken into account.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Soda-AQ pulp yields and total process yields of wheat straw (left) and okra stalk 1 and 2 (right)

In order to get the pulp yield for okra stalk comparable to that for wheat straw, the treatment conditions for okra stalk 2 had to be modified (EA 20% (w/w), 165 °C, and 180 min); the maximum yield obtained was 39% for the untreated okra as shown in Fig. 4. In general, the process yield of okra stalk pulp was lower when compared to that of wheat straw pulp because more material was lost from okra during HWE.

The difference in yields also indicated distinct morphological differences between wheat straw and okra stalk. The kappa number of wheat straw pulps was in the decreasing order (Fig. 5) W/140/P50 > W/150/P200 > W/Untreated/Ref and for okra stalk 2 pulps OK/150/P200 > OK/Untreated/Ref > OK/140/P50. It was noteworthy that under the same conditions (150 °C/P200), the lowest and the highest kappa number for the hot-water-extracted wheat and okra, respectively, was obtained. The difference in kappa number was probably due to differences in lignin structures and, on the other hand, due to the partial and selective redepositing of lignin on fiber surfaces during pre-treatment [28].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Kappa number (left) and residual alkali (right) in wheat straw and okra stalk 2 black liquors

The residual alkali, mainly representing the total amount of neutralized aliphatic carboxylic acids (acetic and formic acids as well as various hydroxy acids) formed during delignification [12], was clearly lower in the case of okra stalk BLs indicating higher formation of organic carboxylic acids during the cooking when compared to the wheat straw cooks. Figure 6 shows the content of volatile acids (acetic and formic acids) in wheat straw and okra stalk 2 BLs. In the wheat straw BLs, the content of acetic acid increased with the increase in pre-treatment temperature, most likely indicating the enhanced removal of acetyl groups from hemicelluloses under harsher pre-treatments. The lowest content of formic acid formed by various degradation reactions of carbohydrates was determined from the BLs originating from the untreated feedstock. The increased formation of formic acid can be explained by the formation of new reducing end groups to the carbohydrate chains caused by the pre-treatments and hence, enhanced peeling reactions taking place in the subsequent pulping. In the okra case, the amount of volatile acids in BLs was almost the same for all feedstock materials but significantly higher than for the wheat straw feedstocks. The amount of lignin in BLs increased with the increase in pre-treatment temperature as shown in Fig. 7. The amount of lignin in wheat straw BL was more than that of okra stalk 2. The highest lignin content was 45 g L−1 at 150 °C/P200 for wheat straw and 35 g L−1 at 140 °C/P50 for okra stalk. The increase in BLs can be explained by the increase in porosity in the structure of feedstock materials during pre-treatments, and hence, an enhanced dissolution of lignin occurred with the increase in pre-treatment temperatures and subsequent pulping.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Volatile acids in wheat straw (left) and okra stalk 2 (right) black liquors

Fig. 7
figure 7

Lignin concentration of wheat straw (left) and okra stalk 2 (right) black liquors

4 Conclusions

The effect of HWE on the soda-AQ pulping of wheat straw and okra stalk was studied. During the first phase (HWE), the mass removal increased with the increasing treatment temperature and time; besides the partial dissolution of hemicelluloses (in the forms of mono-, oligo-, and polysaccharides), the formation of some monomeric degradation products, volatile acids and furans, was observed. The highest mass removals from feedstocks were 12.0 (w/w) and 23.3% (w/w) for wheat straw and okra stalk, respectively.

In the second stage, the pre-treated feedstocks were pulped with soda-AQ method for producing pulp and soluble organic materials (sulfur-free lignin and various carbohydrate-derived degradation products). The highest cooking yields obtained were 57 (w/w) and 41% (w/w) for the pre-treated wheat straw and okra stalk, respectively. Results indicated that HWE stage prior to the delignification had a significant effect on the subsequent soda-AQ pulping. It can also be concluded that the biorefining approach described in this study creates promising possibilities for maximizing the utilization of the feedstocks and simultaneously offering a wide range of dissolved organic components (i.e., carbohydrates and organic acids) for manufacturing various value-added biomass-derived platform chemicals.