Abstract
Bacterial wilt incited by Ralstonia solanacearum is a serious threat to economically important crops throughout the world and warrants strict control strategies. Use of resistant cultivars is one of the most important strategies to dispense with the pernicious consequences of chemicals. In the present study, twenty eight chili cultivars were assessed for their relative resistance or susceptibility to a highly virulent strain of R. solanacearum biovar 3 (RsBd6). Two cultivars namely Skyline-II and Hifly appeared highly resistant. Sanam was the only cultivar found to be resistant while twelve cultivars were categorized as moderately resistant to the bacterium. On the other hand, seven cultivars were rated as moderately susceptible and three showed susceptible reaction. Two cultivars, Talhari and Maxi, behaved as highly susceptible and California Wonder was found to be extremely susceptible. In susceptible cultivars, symptoms appeared 4 days after inoculation resulting in complete wilting within 14 days while in resistant and moderately resistant cultivars, no wilting was observed even after 14 days of inoculation. Brown discoloration in vascular systems of highly susceptible plants was also observed. The resistant and moderately resistant cultivars are therefore recommended for cultivation and in developing new resistant chili cultivars.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is one of the world’s most popular vegetables from solanaceae family after potato and tomato and is being used mainly as spices and condiments (Bosland and Votava 2000). In Pakistan, it is cultivated on an area of 65 thousand hectares and the total annual production of the country is 150 thousand tons. In terms of yield, Morocco stands first with 22.04 tons/ha while Pakistan ranks at 28th position with 2.54 tons/ha yield (FAO 2012). The low yield is attributable to a number of biotic factors including fungi (Iqbal et al. 2014), viruses (Ashfaq et al. 2015), nematodes (Kayani et al. 2017; Mukhtar et al. 2017a) and particularly the bacteria. Ralstonia solanacearum, the incitant of bacterial wilt of chilies, is one of the most economically important plant parasitic bacteria due to its large host range, wide geographic distribution and high destructive potential (Elphinstone 2005; Wicker et al. 2007). The bacterium is soil borne and usually survives in the rhizospheres of the plants and penetrates the roots though natural openings and wounds (Kelman and Sequeira 1965). It has resulted in serious economic losses worldwide particularly in the tropics and is ranked as one of the most important pathogen causing heavy losses worldwide (Artal et al. 2012). The pathogen has affected crop productivity of more than eighty countries throughout the globe causing annual losses to the tune of over one billion USD every year (Hong et al. 2012). In Pakistan, the pathogen is a serious threat to economically important solanaceous crops and its prevalence is widespread in all the agro-ecological zones with varying intensities (Aslam et al. 2015, 2017; Shahbaz et al. 2015). The incidence and severity of bacterial wilt increased when root-knot nematodes were found present conjointly with R. solanacearum in many vegetables (Hussain et al. 2016; Khan et al. 2017; Mukhtar et al. 2014, 2017b; Tariq-Khan et al. 2016).
Huge losses caused by this bacterium in Pakistan warrants strict control strategies. The management of the disease is mainly relied on chemicals which are being discouraged due to health hazards coupled with their use. Resistant cultivars are, therefore, one of the most important alternative strategies to dispense with the pernicious consequences of chemicals. Breeding for resistance requires suitable sources of resistance. For this process, the suitable sources of resistance are necessary and there is no information about the resistance to this disease in the available chili germplasm in Pakistan. Therefore, in the present study, 28 chili cultivars were assessed for their relative resistance or susceptibility to R. solanacearum biovar 3.
Chili germplasm consisted of 28 commercially available cultivars collected from different sources (Table 1). A highly virulent strain of R. solanacearum biovar 3 designated as RsBd6 commonly prevalent in District Badin of Sindh Province of the country (Aslam 2015) was used in the studies. The bacterium was isolated from diseased chili plants showing typical bacterial wilt symptoms, confirmed immunologically (Opina and Miller 2005) and purified from a single colony. The hypersensitive reaction was performed on tobacco and tomato plants and pathogenicity was confirmed on susceptible cultivars of tomato and tobacco (Elphinstone et al. 1996). After molecular confirmation (Opina et al. 1997), the purified culture of the highly virulent strain of R. solanacearum biovar 3 (RsBd6) was prepared and adjusted to 107cfu/ml (Aslam 2015).
The screening of chili germplasm for resistance or susceptibility to R. solanacearum was carried out in the glasshouse. The seeds of 28 chili cultivars were soaked in water for 24 h for their proper germination. The soaked seeds were sown in germination trays containing sterilized peat mass. The trays were put in the glasshouse at a temperature of 25 °C. Three weeks after emergence, the seedlings at 3–4 leaf stage were transferred to polythene bags measuring 12.75 × 10.15 cm containing sterilized soil (sand, silt and compost at the ratio of 3:1:1). There were 40 plants of each cultivar which were divided into 5 batches of 8 plants and placed on a plastic tray. Each batch served as a replication, thus making 5 replications for each cultivar. The trays were arranged in completely randomized design in the glasshouse at a temperature of 25 °C and bags were properly moistened at alternative days. One week after transplantation, the plants of each cultivar were inoculated with 50 ml of bacterial culture containing 107 cfu/ml through soil drenching. One third root system of each cultivar was slightly injured by inserting a sharp sterilized knife about 2 cm away from the stem prior to drenching to facilitate penetration of the bacterium. After inoculation, the plants were watered at alternative days and symptoms of bacterial wilt were observed. The symptoms were recorded till the complete wilting of susceptible cultivars and graded with 0–5 disease rating scale (Winstead and Kelman 1952). The association of the bacterium with the symptom development was confirmed immunologically (Opina and Miller 2005). The disease index of bacterial wilt of each cultivar was then calculated (Aslam et al. 2017).
On the basis of mean disease index, two cultivars namely Skyline-II and Hifly appeared as highly resistant. Sanam was the only cultivar found to be resistant while twelve cultivars were categorized as moderately resistant to the bacterium. On the other hand, seven cultivars were rated as moderately susceptible and three viz. NARC 16/9, Loungi and Neelum showed susceptible reaction. Two cultivars, Talhari and Maxi appeared as highly susceptible and California Wonder was the only cultivar found to be extremely susceptible (Table 1).
It was also observed that in highly susceptible cultivars, characteristic symptoms of bacterial wilt appeared 4 days after inoculation. The symptoms were first observed on leaves and then progressed towards other parts of plants resulting in complete wilting in highly susceptible cultivars. The complete wilting occurred in 14 days within susceptible cultivars. Brown discoloration in vascular system of transversely cut parts of highly susceptible plants was also observed. Re-isolation of bacterium from susceptible plants confirmed the disease. On the other hand, in resistant cultivars, symptoms appeared on leaves followed by chlorosis and no wilting was observed even after 14 days of inoculation. The plants of the extremely susceptible cultivar (California Wonder) wilted entirely and died.
Resistance against R. solanacearum has been reported to be due to certain genes. In some cases a single dominant gene is involved while in other cases few genes are responsible for resistance to the bacterium (Grimault et al. 1995; Monma et al. 1997). A number of quantitative trait loci are also known to control resistance in tomato to bacterial wilt (Ishihara et al. 2012). The resistance and susceptibility have also been associated with symptom development. In susceptible cultivars symptoms appeared after 4 days while resistant ones took 14 days to show symptoms and are in line with the findings of Anith et al. (2004). The resistance to bacterial wilt is strain specific and temperature dependent as has been observed in potato (French and De Lindo 1982). Environmental conditions and locations also influence resistance against bacterial wilt. Hanson et al. (1996) reported variable reaction of tomato lines to bacterial wilt evaluated at several locations in Southeast Asia. This recommends that the germplasm should be evaluated at its local conditions against particular isolates of the pathogen of that area.
In the present study, chili cultivars showed wide variations in their response to R. solanacearum from extremely susceptibility to highly resistance. Two cultivars, Skyline-II and Hifly, appeared as highly resistant, Sanam was resistant and twelve other cultivars were found moderately resistant to the bacterium. The resistant and moderately resistant cultivars are therefore recommended for cultivation under integrated production systems and in developing new resistant chili cultivars.
References
Anith KN, Momol MT, Kloepper JW, Marois JJ, Olson SM, Jones JB (2004) Efficacy of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, acibenzolar-S-methyl, and soil amendment for integrated management of bacterial wilt on tomato. Plant Dis 88:669–673
Artal RB, Gopalakrishnan C, Thippeswamy B (2012) An efficient inoculation method to screen tomato, brinjal and chilli entries for bacterial wilt resistance. Pest Manag Hort Ecosyst 18(1):70–73
Ashfaq M, Saeed U, Mukhtar T, Haq MI (2015) First report of Zucchini yellow mosaic virus in ridge gourd in Pakistan. Plant Dis 99(12):1870. doi:10.1094/PDIS-05-15-0553-PDN
Aslam MN (2015) Variability among Ralstonia solanacearum isolates and screening of chili germplasm for resistance. Dissertation, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Aslam MN, Mukhtar T, Ashfaq M, Asad MJ, Hussain MA (2015) Incidence and prevalence of bacterial wilt of chili in Punjab, Pakistan. Mycopathologia 13(1):37–41
Aslam MN, Mukhtar T, Hussain MA, Raheel M (2017) Assessment of resistance to bacterial wilt incited by Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato germplasm. J Plant Dis Prot. doi:10.1007/s41348-017-0100-1
Bosland PW, Votava EJ (2000) Peppers: vegetable and spice capsicums. CABI Publishing, CAB International, Walingford
Elphinstone JG (2005) The current bacterial wilt situation: a global overview. In: Allen C, Prior P, Hayward AC (eds) Bacterial wilt: the disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. American Phytopathological Society, Saint Paul, pp 9–28
Elphinstone JG, Hennessy J, Wilson JK, Stead DE (1996) Sensitivity of different methods for the detection of Pseudomonas solanacearum in potato tuber extracts. EPPO/OEPP Bulletin 26:663–678
FAO (2012) The state of food insecurity in the world 2004: monitoring progress towards the world food summit and millennium development goals. Rome
French ER, De Lindo L (1982) Resistance to Pseudomonas solanacearum in potato: specificity and temperature sensitivity. Phytopathology 72:1408–1412
Grimault V, Prior P, Anais G (1995) A monogeneic dominant resistance of tomato to bacterial wilt in Hawaii 7996 is associated with plant colonization by Pseudomonas solanacearum. J Phytopathol 143:349–352
Hanson PM, Wang JF, Licardo O, Mah SY, Hartman GL, Lin YC, Chen JT (1996) Variable reaction of tomato lines to bacterial wilt evaluated at several locations in Southeast Asia. Hortscience 31:143–146
Hong JC, Norman DJ, Reed DL, Momol MT, Jones JB (2012) Diversity among Ralstonia solanacearum strains isolated from the southeastern United States. Phytopathology 102:924–936
Hussain MA, Mukhtar T, Kayani MZ (2016) Reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita on resistant and susceptible okra cultivars. Pak J Agri Sci 53:371–375
Iqbal U, Mukhtar T, Iqbal SM (2014) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of antifungal activities of some antagonistic plants against charcoal rot causing fungus, Macrophomina phaseolina. Pak J Agri Sci 51:689–694
Ishihara T, Mitsuhara I, Takahashi H, Nakaho K (2012) Transcriptome analysis of quantitative resistance-specific response upon Ralstonia solanacearum infection in tomato. PLoS One 7:e46763
Kayani MZ, Mukhtar T, Hussain MA (2017) Effects of southern root knot nematode population densities and plant age on growth and yield parameters of cucumber. Crop Prot 92:207–212
Kelman A, Sequeira L (1965) Root–to–root spread of Pseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathology 55:304–309
Khan AR, Javed N, Sahi ST, Mukhtar T, Khan SA, Ashraf W (2017) Glomus mosseae (Gerd & Trappe) and neemex reduce invasion and development of Meloidogyne incognita. Pak J Zool 49(3):841–847
Monma S, Sakata Y, Matsunaga H (1997) Inheritance and selection efficiency of bacterial wilt resistance in tomato. Jpn Agric Res 31:195–204
Mukhtar T, Hussain MA, Kayani MZ, Aslam MN (2014) Evaluation of resistance to root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) in okra cultivars. Crop Prot 56:25–30
Mukhtar T, Arooj M, Ashfaq M, Gulzar A (2017a) Resistance evaluation and host status of selected green gram genotypes against Meloidogyne incognita. Crop Prot 92:198–202
Mukhtar T, Hussain MA, Kayani MZ (2017b) Yield responses of twelve okra cultivars to southern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita). Bragantia 76:108–112
Opina NL, Miller SA (2005) Evaluation of immunoassays for detection of Ralstonia solanacearum, causal agent of bacterial wilt of tomato and eggplant in the Philippines. Acta Hortic 695:353–356
Opina N, Tavner F, Hollway G, Wang JF, Li TH, Maghirang R, Fegan M, Hayward AC, Krishnapillai V, Hong WF, Holloway BW, Timmis J (1997) A novel method for development of species and strain–specific DNA probes and PCR primers for identifying Burkholderia solanacearum (formerly Pseudomonas solanacearum). Asia–Pacific Journal of Molecular Biol Biotech 5:19–30
Shahbaz MU, Mukhtar T, Haque MI, Begum N (2015) Biochemical and serological characterization of Ralstonia solanacearum associated with chilli seeds from Pakistan. Int J Agric Biol 17:31–40
Tariq-Khan M, Munir A, Mukhtar T, Hallmann J, Heuer H (2016) Distribution of root-knot nematode species and their virulence on vegetables in northern temperate agro-ecosystems of the Pakistani-administered territories of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. J Plant Dis Prot. doi:10.1007/s41348-016-0045-9
Wicker E, Grassart L, Coranson-Beaudu R, Mian D, Guilbaud C, Fegan M, Prior P (2007) Ralstonia solanacearum strains from Martinique (French West Indies) exhibiting a new pathogenic potential. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:6790–6801
Winstead NN, Kelman A (1952) Inoculation techniques for evaluation of resistance to Pseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathology 42:628–634
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aslam, M.N., Mukhtar, T., Ashfaq, M. et al. Evaluation of chili germplasm for resistance to bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum . Australasian Plant Pathol. 46, 289–292 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-017-0491-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-017-0491-2