Abstract
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a small subpopulation of tumor cells with capabilities of self-renewal, dedifferentiation, tumorigenicity, and inherent chemo-and-radio therapy resistance. Tumor resistance is believed to be caused by CSCs that are intrinsically challenging to common treatments. A number of CSC markers including CD44, CD133, receptor tyrosine kinase, aldehyde dehydrogenases, epithelial cell adhesion molecule/epithelial specific antigen, and ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 have been proved as the useful targets for defining CSC population in solid tumors. Furthermore, targeting CSC markers through new therapeutic strategies will ultimately improve treatments and overcome cancer drug resistance. Therefore, the identification of novel strategies to increase sensitivity of CSC markers has major clinical implications. This review will focus on the innovative treatment methods such as nano-, immuno-, gene-, and chemotherapy approaches for targeting CSC-specific markers and/or their associated signaling pathways.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Tumors generally develop significant resistance to repeated treatment with one/many kinds of anticancer agents, and cancer drug resistance can be a major obstacle in the efficacy of chemotherapy agents [1]. In this regard, most of the cancers are resistant to chemotherapeutic drugs due to cancer stem cells’ (CSCs) population which ultimately results in tumor relapse [2]. CSCs are a small subpopulation of tumor cells with capabilities of self-renewal, dedifferentiation, tumorigenicity, and inherent chemo- and radiotherapy resistance [3]. Therefore, a successful cancer treatment will likely need to eliminate CSCs. At present, conventional anticancer therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy can rapidly suppress the growth of differentiated tumor cells; however, they potentially remain behind cancer-initiating cells [4, 5]. Herein, CSC markers are attractive targets for novel cancer-targeting therapy since the high expression of these markers has been observed in most human tumors [6, 7]. Surface markers of CSCs are generally shared by somatic stem cells (SSCs). However, slight surface antigen differences as well as signaling pathways and metabolic alterations can hopefully distinguish between CSCs and SSCs and may be exploited for the selective tumor-targeted therapies [8]. In this regard, a number of CSC markers including CD44, CD133, receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH), epithelial cell adhesion molecule/epithelial specific antigen (EpCAM/ESA), and ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2) have been proved as the useful targets for defining CSC population in solid tumors (Table 1) [9, 10]. Therefore, selective tumor targeting of these CSC markers with new therapeutic strategies will ultimately improve cancer treatments via overcoming drug resistance (Fig. 1). There are many CSC drug resistance agents including ATP-binding cassette (ABC), permeability glycoprotein (P-gp), microtubules (MTs) alteration, topoisomerase (Topo), P53, breast cancer type 1 (BRAC1), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) [11]. Currently, new treatment methods such as targeting of antibody and nanoparticle (NP)-based CSC-specific markers or the related signaling pathways are available or under investigation.
This review will focus on the association between CSC markers and several related signaling pathways in regulating tumor cell survival and multi-drug resistance. This new knowledge can serve as groundwork for the future development of new drug targets for inhibiting CSC markers in order to overcome drug resistance in the progression of cancers.
CD44
CD44 is a major surface hyaluronan (HA) receptor which is implicated in the progression of some cancers including melanoma, breast, ovarian, and head and neck [13]. It can up-regulate in a broad range of malignant tumors, and its high expression may correlate with poor prognosis of some cancers. In fact, it is one of the important surface markers on CSCs [14–16]. Interestingly, recent studies have indicated that both HA and CD44 involve in chemotherapeutic resistance in many cancers [17]. Specifically, HA binding is capable of stimulating multidrug resistance protein 1 expression and drug resistance in tumor cells [18]. Moreover, CD44 can interact with P-gp to promote cell migration and invasion of tumor cells [9]. Furthermore, HA/CD44-mediated ErbB2 signaling and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3k)/AKT-related survival pathways may involve in cancer drug resistance [19]. In addition, activation of several HA/CD44-mediated oncogenic signaling pathways, e.g., intracellular Ca2+ mobilization, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mediated extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK), and topoisomerase activation, lead to multidrug resistance in head and neck cancers [20]. In another study, Miletti-Gonzalez et al. in 2005 have suggested that there is an association between CD44 and ABCB1 in their transcriptional mechanism [21]. Moreover, the expression of Nanog (a transcription factor critically involved in self-renewal of undifferentiated embryonic stem cells) and its interaction with HA and CD44 can also lead to the appearance of stem cell regulators such as Rex1 and Sox2 in ovarian and breast tumors. The formation of Nanog and Stat-3 complex can induce MDR1 gene expression and activation by HA-CD44 interaction that may persuade multidrug resistance [22]. Accordingly, evaluation and targeting of CD44 and its related signaling pathways can be helpful for overcoming cancer drug resistance.
The cell surface membrane-bound proteins are interesting objects for enriching, isolating, and identifying CSCs, and consequently cancer therapy. Delivering cytotoxic drugs to CSCs via specific markers can be a useful method in cancer therapy. Furthermore, the use of inhibitors of drug-detoxify enzymes, drug-efflux pumps, and/or transcription factors of CSCs can represent a potential approach to target CSCs, and consequently reduction of cancer recurrence and metastasis [3, 7]. Gu et al. in 2015 applied the gene- and chemotherapy via application of anti-CD44 antibody-conjugated pluronic P123-PPI (anti-CD44-P123-PPI)-based nanocarrier to deliver selectively pDNA-iMDR1-shRNA into MCF-7/ADR cells. The results indicated that the anti-CD44-P123-PPI/pDNA-iMDR1-shRNA nanocomplexes can specifically silence MDR1 and inhibit P-gp expression in MCF-7/ADR cells. These results also demonstrated that the sensitivity of MCF-7/ADR cells to doxorubicin (DOX) was significantly enhanced after transfection with pDNA-iMDR1-shRNA [14]. Yang et al. in 2015 indicated that the expression of MDR1 and functional activity of P-gp were decreased via delivering MDR1 siRNA with HA poly(ethyleneimine)/HA poly(ethylene glycol) (HAPEI/HAPEG) nanoparticle into SKOV3TR and OVCAR8TR (MDR ovarian cancer lines). Moreover, increasing cell sensitivity to paclitaxel (PTX) was observed in this method. Thus, CD44 can be a potential therapeutic target for antibody-drug conjugates, and anti-CD44 antibody-drug conjugates may be a therapeutic agent for elimination of CD44+ tumors [23]. Currently, Zhiyuan Zhong et al. in 2015 have found that HA-Lys-LA nanoparticle conjugates (Lys, l-lysine methyl ester; LA, lipoic acid) can be a multifunctional platform for delivery of active CD44-targeting DOX, and consequently overcoming drug resistance in in vitro and in vivo studies. These HA NPs with excellent CD44-targetability have appeared as novel potent platforms for CD44-targeted chemotherapy with effective overcoming approach to cancer drug resistance [24]. Furthermore, Liu et al. in 2014 demonstrated that the cytotoxicity of PTX loaded in hyaluronic acidoctadecyl (HAC18) and folate hyaluronic acidoctadecyl (FAHAC18) micelles can increase intracellular delivery of PTX by active receptor-mediated endocytosis. It was concluded that the dual targeting of FAHAC18 micelles can demonstrate an excellent MDR overcoming ability and can provide a novel effective nanoplatform for anticancer drug delivery in cancer chemotherapy [25]. Additionally, objective construction of RNA interference vectors targeting CD44 could specifically target CD44 gene and down-regulate its expression. These can inhibit K562/A02 cell proliferation and induce apoptosis and may effectively reverse the multidrug resistance [26].
In summary, the collected data demonstrate that CD44 is one of the most important CSC markers associated with drug resistance agents such as P-gp as well as its related signaling pathways such as Wnt/β-catenin and PI3-kinase/AKT pathways [18, 19]. Thus, targeting CD44 has beneficial effects on overcoming cancer drug resistance (Table 2). In this regard, applying nanotechnological approaches has gained an immense popularity for targeting CD44 in the recent years due to their potential capabilities to improve therapeutic effects. NPs as non-viral vectors can avoid viral vector disadvantages and can also be conjugated with tumor targeting or other drug molecules, siRNA, and CD44 antibodies for the purpose of combination therapies in order to overcome multidrug resistance [11]. Moreover, the combination of nanotechnological approaches with gene- and chemotherapy agents has been applied for targeting CD44 and overcoming drug resistance due to P-gp. The results of pre-clinical studies displayed that using nanocarrier for delivery of MDR1 SiRNA and pDNA-iMDR1-shRNA can have beneficial effects on cancer drug resistance via inhibition of P-gp expression at mRNA and protein levels [14, 23, 26]. In addition, PTX-loaded HA-C18 and FA-HA-C18 micelles and DOX-loaded-HA-Lys-LA caused high drug accumulation in the tumor as well as drug leakage inhibition and apoptosis in in vitro and in vivo studies [24, 25]. Moreover, applying MDR siRNA and shRNA among gene therapy methods attained great attention in comparison with other genes and can suppress MDR1 expression [14, 23, 26]. Yet, overcoming cancer-drug-resistant agents and their related signaling pathways has not vastly been used in clinical trials via targeting CD44. In this regard, it seems that the combination of nano-, gene-, and chemotherapy approaches can have a great potential to be adopted by clinical trials in the future.
CD133
CD133, a member of prominin family, consists of five transmembrane single-chain glycoproteins [29] and is initially identified in the CD34-positive hematopoietic stem cells [30, 31]. It consists of two extracellular domains with a potential glycosylation, affected by alternative splicing, which can produce various epitopes [32]. The localization of CD133 in highly curved plasma membrane protrusions seems to be essential for scaffolding membrane glycoprotein [30, 33, 34]. Among crucial CSC biomarkers, CD133 can play a dominant role in drug resistance [35]. CD133 can confer drug resistance via various signaling pathways. In this regard, CD133 can enhance the activity of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) via Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and subsequently leads to degradation and activation of β-catenin signaling targets [36]. In concordance with molecular features of cancer stem cells, CD133+ cells express high levels of cell surface receptors such as the cytokine receptor CXCR4 which is necessary for paracrine signaling axis. In addition, Celia Chao et al. in 2012 showed that CD133 can trigger the paracrine signaling pathways with carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) into the tumor microenvironment [37]. Recent studies have revealed that the receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase kappa (PTPRK) as a novel binding partner of CD133 has the ability to dephosphorylate CD133 [38]. A previous study demonstrated that there is an association between the phosphorylation level of CD133 and the human glioma progression [39]. Consistent with these observations, tyrosine phosphorylation of CD133 via subsequent activation of AKT/β-catenin oncogenic pathway was observed as a prominent role of CD133 in colon carcinogenesis. Moreover, phosphorylation of the tyrosine-828 residue in CD133 C-terminal cytoplasmic domain contributes to preferential activation of the PI3K-Akt pathway in CD133+ glioma cells via direct interaction between CD133 and the PI3K regulatory subunit (p85) which can result in MDR1 activation through the PI3K/Akt/NF-kB pathway. Furthermore, high levels of CD133 in MDR cells were correlated in resistance to chemotherapy [40, 41]. Another study determined that the high expression level of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) in chemo-resistance can prevent cancer cells from undergoing apoptosis following chemotherapy [42]. In support of this notion, it has been shown that CD133 and DNA-PK independently contribute in regulation of MDR1 expression via PI3K or Akt/NF-kB cascades. Moreover, regarding to the biological properties of CD133, in contrast to normal cell, CD133-positive cells exhibit stronger activation of ataxia telangiectasia- and Rad3-related (ATR) dependent DNA-damage response (DDR) pathway on treatment with inter-strand crosslinking (ICL agents) and subsequently cause phosphorylation of checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) [43]. It has been previously elucidated that CD133-expressing tumor cells may preferentially activate DNA damage checkpoints in response to radiation and can repair radiation-induced DNA damage more effectively than CD133-negative tumor cells. These findings suggested ATR/CHK1-dependent DNA damage as a likely mechanism of CSC drug- and irradiation-resistance in several tumors [44]. Therefore, CD133 can play a dominant role in establishment of resistance to many curative options. In this regard, many studies attempted to suggest solutions in order to overcome the resistance.
Some studies have been performed in order to overcome drug resistance via targeting CD133 and/or related signaling pathways (Table 3). Chi-Tai Yeh et al. in 2012 revealed that trifluoperazine combined with gefitinib or cisplatin can be a potential anti-CSC agent for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line. Trifluoperazine anticancer properties concord with its ability to suppress CD44/CD133 lung spheroids formation which can down-regulate Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Additionally, trifluoperazine can suppress the stemness-associated expressions such as CD133, c-Myc, and β-catenin, while modulating apoptotic factors including Bax, Bad, Bcl-2, and caspases. It can also cause a significant reduction in cell viability, ALDH-1 activity, and self-renewal of NSCLC spheroids [45]. According to the research conducted by Gallmeier et al. in 2011, the inhibition of ATR function through caffeine and RNA interference may impoverish the tumorigenicity in CD133+ human and xenograft-derived primary colon cancer cells. Likewise, caffeine induced depletion of CD133+ cells that was mediated through direct inhibition of ATR by indirect inhibition of its main effector kinase CHK1 [43]. Additionally, in vitro and in vivo applying of dCD133KDEL (deimmunized Pseudomonas exotoxin fused to anti-CD133 scFv with a KDEL terminus) showed a promise for ovarian cancer therapy [46].
In summary, CD133 and preferential activation of many related signaling cascades in CSCs can play a dominant role in establishment of resistance to many curative options. In this regard, many studies attempted to suggest solutions in order to overcome the resistance. In most of preclinical studies, targeting CD133-related signaling pathways has been used for overcoming drug resistance in CD133+ CSCs. In this context, targeting Wnt/β-catenin, ATR-dependent DDR, Notch, mTOR, and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways and also their intermediate molecules led to suppression or down-regulation of these signaling pathways and/or their intermediate molecules (Table 3). So far, considerable combination therapy in preclinical studies and single therapy strategies in clinical trials have not been vastly used for overcoming drug resistance with CD133+ CSCs. Thus, it seems that the combination of nano-, gene-, and chemotherapy approaches can have great potentials to be adopted by preclinical and clinical trials in the future.
Receptor tyrosine kinases
Among the various targets in cancer inhibition, receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) have attractive features. Structurally, RTKs consist of an extracellular domain that serves as the ligand-binding region; traverse the cell plasma membrane and transduce extracellular signals into the intracellular sections. Overexpression and mutations of RTKs are known to be involved in pathophysiology of several kinds of cancers [51]. They have been classified into different classes such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and colony stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF-1R). These have been demonstrated to increase phosphorylation of both Janus family kinases (JAK) and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT). JAK/STAT pathway is related to stem cell factor (SCF) signal transduction, but there is little knowledge about it [52]. FMS-like receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) is the class 3 of RTK, and its mutations can be the most frequent genetic alterations reported in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). FLT3 mutations may cause some problems in chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation in AML patients [51]. Moreover, targeting other receptor tyrosine kinases including MET and/or its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), will be a new strategy to inhibit proliferation and angiogenesis in the high-grade gliomas [53]. Other important signaling pathways involving in CSC drug resistance include PI3K/AKT/mTOR, PI3K/Akt and MAPK, AKT-ERK1/2 and p70 s6k, and EGFR/mTOR pathways.
Dysregulation of tyrosine kinases expression often leads to cell transformation, which is observed in a wide variety of malignancies. Therefore, targeting RTK signaling pathways by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is an intensive challenge for scientists and clinicians (Table 4). Numerous TKIs are being clinically developed to target RTKs, MAP kinase, and PI3K/AKT pathways. Both dual blockade of extra- and intra-cellular parts of RTKs and/or targeting more RTKs using mAbs and TKIs may decrease drug resistance rate and improve cancer treatment. A combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib in xenografted mice with HER2 over-expressing cells has displayed a considerable prevention from tumor growth and survival rate [54]. Using cetuximab and gefitinib for dual targeting of EGFR has shown the synergic effects on suppression of tumor proliferation and inhibition of drug resistance in colon cancer cells [55]. Furthermore, a combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib had a more significant clinical response [56, 57]. Zhiguang Xiao et al. in 2014 showed a possible molecular mechanism underlying the inhibitory activity of METF/SAL through EGFR targeting that can lead to inhibit EGFR-mediated pro-survival and anti-apoptotic signals by MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways in NSCLC cells [58]. Rongxin Dengand et al. in 2013 have currently found a new gamboge derivative, compound 2 (C2), which had suppressive effects on CSCs via EGF/EGFR signaling pathways. In this study, EGF failed to initiate the phosphorylation of EGFR and led to significantly and non-significantly decreased expression of phospho-Akt and phospho-Erk1/2, respectively [59]. Furthermore, Cedric Dos Santos et al. in 2013 demonstrated that the combination of dasatinib with daunorubicin (DNR) inhibited MAPK phosphorylation in AML progenitors and increased p53 activity through PI3K/Akt and MAPK signaling pathways [60].
Concisely, several RTK–TKIs and other inhibitors have been developed, but only a few TKIs have been used in clinical trials or have been approved by authorities for cancer treatment. In this regard, SU5416 (inhibitor of VEGF receptors, c-kit, and FLT3) was applied in AML patients in phase II clinical trial [61]. Moreover, targeting the other members of receptor tyrosine kinases family and/or molecules of related signaling pathways was used in pre-clinical studies using mAb and siRNA (Table 4) [27, 62, 63]. Furthermore, most TKIs are multi-targeted drugs and applying them has several disadvantages such as side effects and the complication of the results interpretation. Therefore, developing more specific/selective TKIs is essential because of current problems. Understanding the effects and characteristics of each TKI in preclinical studies using different animal models and deeper understanding of CSC biology are required for developing specific RTK–TKIs in order to target CSCs and overcome drug resistance.
ABCG2
ABCG2 belongs to ABC transporter family as one of the most common drug resistance mechanism and consists of four domains; two nucleotide-binding and two transmembrane [69, 70]. ABCG2 has an important physiological function in tissue protection against toxins and xenobiotics through drug elimination [71]; however, its expression increases in many types of solid tumors, particularly GI (gastrointestinal), endometrium, and melanoma tumors [71, 72]. Moreover, one of the plausible arguments for drug resistance is the high levels of ABCG2 transporter [73–75] that extrude the therapeutic drugs out of cells. ABCG2 is also associated with chemo-resistance through several critical regulatory pathways such as hedgehog (Hh), PI3K/Akt, and β-catenin/ABCG2 signaling pathways. Therefore, many studies have designed some strategies in order to evade MDR by targeting ABCG2-related signaling pathways and/or employing ABCG2 inhibitors/modulators [76, 77]. Accordingly, Hh signaling pathway has shown to be involved in maintaining high expression levels of MDR1 and ABCG2 in some epithelial cancers [78]. The abnormal expression of Hh signaling-related proteins such as sonic hedgehog and GLI1 can positively enhance ABCG2 up-regulation. Applying cyclopamine-KAAD showed a therapeutic rate in overcoming chemo-resistance in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) via inhibition of Hh signaling pathway [79, 80]. Moreover, β-catenin signaling pathway showed a positive correlation with chemo-resistance and ABCG2 expression. Furthermore, the usage of isoliquiritigenin (ISL) as an ABC inhibitor resulted in inhibition of β-catenin/ABCG2 signaling via direct targeting of 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78) and activating of proteasome degradation in CSCs. In addition, ISL could down-regulate the β-catenin/ABCG2 pathway through activation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3β) and inhibition of Akt, and consequently led to increase β-catenin phosphorylation and proteasome degradation [77]. As aforementioned, PI3K/Akt signaling activation has been considered as one of the main causative factors underlying cancer progression. A recent study showed that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists can be described as a potential agent for overcoming drug resistance through up-regulating of PTEN and inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway. PPAR agonists may also play a role in driving the internalization of ABCG2 to cell cytoplasm and may inhibit MDR [76]. PTEN inactivation has been found in various cancers and has been observed to be accompanied by tumor progression [81]. According to another study, tunicamycin combined with cisplatin was used in hepatocellular carcinomas to overcome drug resistance via targeting dolichyl-phosphate N-acetyl glucosamine phosphotransferase 1 (DPAGT1), Akt, and ABCG2 pathways. Additionally, blockage of drug efflux employing ABCG2 inhibitors or modulators seems to be the feasible strategy to restore drug sensitivity in MDR cancer cells [47]. A previous study demonstrated that the suppression of adenine nucleotide translocase 2 (ANT2) by short hairpin RNA (shRNA) can inhibit the migration and the invasion of SK-BR3 (HER2/neu-overexpressing human breast cancer cells) through suppression of HSP90’s (heat shock protein 90) function and inhibition of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway [82]. Furthermore, Jang et al. in 2012 revealed that knockdown of ANT2 by adeno-shRNA virus is a useful strategy to induce cell death and the chemosensitivity of MCF7, MDA-MB-231, and MCF10A stem-like cells to doxorubicin by down-regulation of ABCG2 [83]. Moreover, ABCG2 mAb plus PTX-loaded Fe3O4 NPs induced the therapeutic response in multiple myeloma in non-obese-diabetic/severe-combined-immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mouse model [84]. Furthermore, a novel specific ABCG2 inhibitor, PZ-39 (N-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-[(6-{[4,6-di(4-morpholinyl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl] amino}-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl) sulfanyl] acetamide), showed a beneficial treatment effect by inhibiting ABCG2 activity and accelerating lysosome-dependent degradation in cancer cells over-expressing ABCG2 [85].
Briefly, ABCG2 can play a key role in MDR and protection of CSCs. Thus, ABCG2 can be an ideal target for development of chemo-sensitizing agents for better treatment of drug-resistant cancers and helping eradicate CSCs. Accordingly, many studies have designed the strategies in order to suppress MDR through targeting ABCG2 related signaling pathways such as Hh, PI3K/Akt, and β-catenin/ABCG2 and/or employing ABCG2 inhibitors/modulators (Table 5). In this regard, ISL and PPARγ agonists were used to overcome drug resistance via targeting β-catenin/ABCG2 and DPAGT1/Akt/ABCG2 signaling pathways, respectively [76, 77]. Moreover, the new specific ABCG2 inhibitors (e.g., PZ-39), gene therapy approaches, NPs, and ABCG2 mAb combination were used in preclinical studies (Table 5). In this context, knockdown of ABCG2 and ANT2 was applied in preclinical studies for ABCG2 inhibition as gene therapy methods through ABCG2 siRNA and adeno-shRNA virus [83, 86]. In addition, the combination of NPs-based approaches with gene- and chemotherapy agents was applied for targeting ABCG2 and overcoming drug resistance [84, 87]. However, overcoming cancer-drug-resistant agents and their signaling pathways via targeting ABCG2 has not been vastly used in clinical trials. It seems that the combination of nano-, gene-, and chemotherapy approaches can have a great potential to be adopted by clinical trials in the future.
Aldehyde dehydrogenase
Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), a multifunctional enzyme with 11 families and 4 subfamilies, is widely distributed in tissues and can catalyze the oxidation of endogenous and exogenous aldehydes to their equivalent carboxylic acids [92, 93]. Among ALDH superfamily, two isoenzymes (ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1) have been shown to be eligible markers for identification between normal cells and CSCs. A previous study demonstrated that in comparison with differentiated cells, human hematopoietic stem cells are characterized by high levels of ALDH1 expression [94]. High ALDH1A1 or ALDH3A1 activity was also reported to be attributable to CSCs’ aggressiveness through conferring drug resistance [95]. Moreover, high activity of ALDH1 was detected in various cancer types that assumed to be responsible for lower overall survival in patients with ALDH1-positive tumors compared to the ALDH1-low patients [95, 96]. ALDH via retinoid signaling pathways can play a key role in regulation of gene expression and cell differentiation. It is one of four retinoid dehydrogenases involved in the process of retinoid acid synthesis which mediates transcription of different sets of genes controlling growth and development in CSCs [97, 98]. In addition, ALDH1 is transcriptionally activated in a c-Jun-dependent manner through a pathway consisting of RhoA, MAP kinase-kinase-4, and Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) [99]. Furthermore, application of specific ALDH1 inhibitors such as 4-(diethylamino)benzaldehyde (DEAB) or siRNA can abate the intrinsic retinoic acid by decreasing cEBPε (RAR-specific response gene) that can be a promising curative option, especially in patients with high ALDH activity [94, 96]. In this regard, treatment of Lovo-1- and K1-resistant cells with ALDH1A3 siRNAs or DEAB showed to be an effective strategy for sensitizing these cells to Y15 [an inhibitor of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and ALDH1A3 up-regulator] and consequently inhibition of cancer cell growth [100]. Moreover, an in vivo study demonstrated that applying copolymer of poly(ethylene glycol) with poly (d,l-lactide) (MPEG5KPLA11K) NPs loaded with low-dose decitabine (DAC) combined with MPEG5KPLA11K NPs and DOX had a promising outcome in tumor suppression and growth inhibition of MDA-MB-231 cells (ALDHhi CSC) [101]. Co-treatment with UCN-01, a checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) inhibitor, and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) as ALDH inhibitor represented a promising pharmacological targeted strategy that can significantly sensitize CSCs to photon or carbon ion radiation and induce cell death in SQ20B (radio-resistant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma) [102]. Furthermore, thermo-chemotherapy platform with salinomycin-loaded gold nanorods (AuNRs) revealed a competent strategy for reduction of MCF-7 (ALDH+) cells subpopulation [103].
In summary, several studies have been designed to overcome drug resistance in ALDH-positive cells due to ALDH1 multiple functional roles in normal cells and CSCs. Targeting ALDH as an important CSC marker can be promising in cancer treatment using pharmacological agents (e.g., DEAB), molecular targeting (e.g., siRNA), and also nanotechnology approaches (Table 6). In preclinical studies, applying ALDH inhibitors such as DEAB and ATRA have beneficial effects on ALDH+ CSC treatment. Moreover, MPEG5KPLA11K and AuNRs NPs were used as nanocarriers and showed a promising outcome in tumor suppression and growth inhibition of ALDH+ CSCs. Additionally, new thermo-chemotherapy platform with NPs provides a new combinatorial strategy for effective inhibition of radio-resistant ALDH+ CSCs [103]. Among these approaches, ATRA in combination with cyclophosphamide have been applied for treatment of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia in clinical trial and relatively improved disease-free and overall survival in the patients [104]. Moreover, combination of tamoxifen with ATRA demonstrated an acceptable toxicity in a small phase I/II trial of an advanced breast cancer patient [105]. Thus, it seems that understanding of the pathways associated with ALDH family in CSCs and designing new approaches for overcoming drug resistance in CSCs will improve the current cancer treatment.
Epithelial cell adhesion molecule
Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM; also called CD326, ESA, EGP-2, or TROP-1) belongs to type 1 membrane glycoprotein family which is an important CSC marker [111]. It consists of an extracellular (EpEx), a transmembrane (EpTM), and an intracellular (EpICD) domain. EpCAM is a tumor-associated antigen and its over-expression has been reported in epithelial tumors such as breast cancer and retinoblastoma [112, 113]. Moreover, EpCAM is involved in metastasis of adenocarcinoma and breast cancer and can play an essential role in oncogenic signaling pathways through its proteolysis and EpICD translocation into the nucleus [114, 115]. Proteolysis of EpCAM causes the complex formation of EpICD with FHL2 and β-catenin that can consequently modulate transcription of their target genes [114]. Moreover, EpICD may positively regulate SOX2, OCT4, and NANOG transcription factors which may contribute to self-renewal and pluripotency of cancer cells [116]. Therefore, it seems that EpCAM can be as an immunotherapeutic target for the treatment of most abundant cancers (Table 7). Various anti-EpCAM therapeutic antibodies as single or in combination therapies have been developed in (pre)clinical studies over the past 30 years [117, 118]. In this regard, a previous study showed that a bispecific EpCAMxCD3 antibody (BxPC-3) can improve the immune response and treatment outcome in in vitro and in vivo pancreatic cancer [119]. Another anti-EpCAM antibody, MOC31, has extensively been studied for tumor targeting in various drug delivery systems [120]. Suggested mechanisms of anti-EpCAM therapeutic antibodies can involve in antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-mediated cytotoxicity (CDC). So far, a few anti-EpCAM mAbs such as MT201 (adecatumumab), adecatumumab, ING-1, 3622W94, and chimeric edrecolomab have been demonstrated under clinical investigations in patients with prostate and breast cancer [111, 117]. ING-1 and 3622W94 have also demonstrated a much higher affinity in comparison with adecatumumab and edrecolomab [111, 117]. Moreover, these antibodies have increased lysis of EpCAM-expressing cancer cells via both ADCC and CDC. In addition, the chimeric version of edrecolomab with a human Fcγ1 domain was more potent in ADCC compared to murine IgG2a version. Furthermore, among these anti-EpCAM mAbs, only adecatumumab displayed a significant prevention from MCF-7 proliferation in the absence of complement proteins and the other immune cells [111, 117]. Besides mAb, aptamers as synthetic oligonucleotides (RNA/ssDNA) or peptide molecules are applied to overcome drug resistance in EpCAM-expressing CSCs. These molecules bind to a specific target (e.g., EpCAM) with high affinity due to their three-dimensional structures [121, 122]. Several aptamer–siRNA chimerization strategies were applied for targeting EpCAM in CSCs [10]. For example, EpCAM RNA aptamer–EpCAM siRNA chimera (EpApt-siEp) showed a high antitumor activity without any toxicity in EpCAM-positive cells and xenograft model with MCF7 cells [122]. So, applying of anti-EpCAM mAbs and aptamers can be a useful method to overcome cancer drug resistance in EpCAM-positive CSCs.
Conclusions
Tumors generally develop a significant resistance to repeated treatments with one/many kinds of anticancer agents, and so, cancer drug resistance can be a major obstacle in the efficacy of chemotherapy agents [124]. Here, most of the cancers are resistant to the chemotherapeutic drugs due to CSC population which ultimately result in tumor relapse [2]. CSCs are a small subpopulation of cells within multiple malignancies with capabilities of self-renewal, dedifferentiation, tumorigenicity and inherent chemo-and-radio therapy resistance [3]. A number of CSC markers including CD44, CD133, RTK, ALDH, EpCAM/ESA, and ABCG2 have been proved as useful targets for defining CSC population in solid tumors (Table 1) [9, 10]. Therefore, selective tumor targeting by these CSC markers with new therapeutic strategies will ultimately improve most malignancies. Currently, the new treatment methods such as antibody-directed therapies and NPs-based targeting of CSC-specific markers or their signaling pathways are available or under investigation (Fig. 1). In the present study, we focused on the association between CSC markers and several related signaling pathways in tumor cell survival and multi-drug resistance. Applying nanotechnological approaches has gained an immense popularity for targeting CD44, ABCG2, and ALDH due to their potential therapeutic capabilities. NPs can also be conjugated with tumor-targeting molecules, siRNA, and antibodies with the purpose of combination therapies in order to overcome multidrug resistance [11, 125]. Moreover, knock-down of CD44, CD133, ALDH, and ABCG2 was applied in pre-clinical studies through siRNA and adeno-shRNA viruses as the gene therapy methods [83, 86]. Furthermore, mAbs were applied to overcome drug resistance for CSC markers including CD133, EpCAM/ESA, and ABCG2. Among mAbs applications, few anti-EpCAM mAbs such as MT201 (adecatumumab), ING-1, 3622W94, and chimeric edrecolomab have demonstrated clinical potential and are currently under clinical investigation in patients with prostate and breast cancer [111, 117]. Among treatment methods, combination of nano-, immuno-, gene-, and chemotherapy approaches seem to have a great potential to be adopted by preclinical and clinical trials in the future. Moreover, understanding of the pathways associated with CSC markers can be helpful for designing new approaches for overcoming drug resistance in CSCs in the future.
Abbreviations
- ABCG2:
-
ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2
- ABCB5:
-
ATP-binding cassette transporter B5
- ADR:
-
Adriamycin
- ALDH1:
-
Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1
- AML:
-
Acute myeloid leukemia
- ANT2:
-
Adenine nucleotide translocase 2
- ATRA:
-
All-trans retinoic acid
- AuNRs:
-
Gold nanorods
- BRAC1:
-
Breast cancer type 1
- CAF:
-
Carcinoma-associated fibroblast
- Chk1:
-
Checkpoint kinase
- CSF-1:
-
Colony stimulating factor 1
- CSCs:
-
Cancer stem cells
- dCD133KDEL:
-
Deimmunized Pseudomonas exotoxin fused to anti-CD133 scFv with a KDEL terminus
- DEAB:
-
4-(Diethylamino)benzaldehyde
- DLBCL:
-
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma
- DNR:
-
Daunorubicin
- DPAGT1:
-
Dolichyl-phosphate N-acetylglucosamine phosphotransferase 1
- DOX:
-
Doxorubicin
- EGFR:
-
Epidermal growth factor receptor
- EpCAM:
-
Epithelial cell adhesion molecule
- ERK:
-
Extracellular-signal-regulated kinases
- ESA:
-
Epithelial specific antigen
- FA:
-
Folate
- FAHAC18:
-
Folate hyaluronic acidoctadecyl
- FLT3:
-
FMS-like receptor tyrosine kinase 3
- GBM:
-
Glioblastoma multiforme
- GRP78:
-
78 kDa glucose-regulated protein
- GSK3β:
-
Glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta
- HA:
-
Hyaluronan
- HAC18:
-
Hyaluronic acidoctadecyl
- HAPEI/HA:
-
HA poly(ethyleneimine)/HA
- Hh:
-
Hedgehog
- ISL:
-
Isoliquiritigenin
- PEG:
-
Poly(ethylene glycol)
- HDAC6:
-
Histone deacetylase 6
- HER2:
-
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
- HGF:
-
Hepatocyte growth factor
- HSP90:
-
Heat shock protein 90
- JAK:
-
Janus family kinases
- JNK:
-
Jun N-terminal kinase
- LA:
-
Lipoic acid
- pDNA:
-
Plasmid DNA
- MAPK:
-
Mitogen-activated protein kinase
- METF:
-
Metformin
- mAb:
-
Monoclonal antibody
- MDR1:
-
Multidrug resistance protein 1
- MM:
-
Multiple myeloma
- mPEG-PLGA-PLL, PEAL:
-
Monomethoxy polyethylene glycol–polylactic acid/glycolic acid–poly(l-lysine) triblock copolymer
- MT:
-
Microtubules
- NPs:
-
Nanoparticles
- NSCLC:
-
Non-small cell lung cancer
- PEG:
-
Poly(ethylene glycol)
- PEO:
-
Poly(ethylene oxide)
- PDGF:
-
Platelet-derived growth factor
- PI3:
-
Phosphoinositide 3
- PPI:
-
Polypropylenimine
- PTEN:
-
Phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10
- PTPRK:
-
Receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase k
- PTX:
-
Paclitaxel
- P-gp:
-
Permeability glycoprotein
- PZ-39:
-
N-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-[(6-{[4,6-di(4-morpholinyl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl] amino}-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl; sulfanyl]acetamide)
- ROR1:
-
Type I receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor
- RTK:
-
Receptor tyrosine kinase
- SAL:
-
Salinomycin
- SCF:
-
Stem cell factor
- shRNA:
-
Short hairpin RNA
- STAT:
-
Signal transducers and activators of transcription
- SSCs:
-
Somatic stem cells
- TKI:
-
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors
- Topo:
-
Topoisomerase
References
Johari-Ahar M, Barar J, Alizadeh AM, Davaran S, Omidi Y, Rashidi M-R. Methotrexate-conjugated quantum dots: synthesis, characterisation and cytotoxicity in drug resistant cancer cells. J Drug Target. 2016;24(2):120–33.
Vinogradov S, Wei X. Cancer stem cells and drug resistance: the potential of nanomedicine. Nanomed. 2012;7(4):597–615.
Andrews TE, Wang D, Harki DA. Cell surface markers of cancer stem cells: diagnostic macromolecules and targets for drug delivery. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2013;3(2):121–42.
Xue X, Liang X-J. Overcoming drug efflux-based multidrug resistance in cancer with nanotechnology. Chin J Cancer. 2012;31(2):100.
Farsinejad S, Gheisary Z, Samani SE, Alizadeh AM. Mitochondrial targeted peptides for cancer therapy. Tumor Biol. 2015;36(8):5715–25.
Vaz AP, Ponnusamy MP, Batra SK. Cancer stem cells and therapeutic targets: an emerging field for cancer treatment. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2013;3(2):113–20.
Alama A, Orengo AM, Ferrini S, Gangemi R. Targeting cancer-initiating cell drug-resistance: a roadmap to a new-generation of cancer therapies? Drug Discov Today. 2012;17(9):435–42.
Mimeault M, Batra SK. Novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for optimizing the therapeutic management of melanomas. World J Clin Oncol. 2012;3(3):32–42.
Shapira A, Livney YD, Broxterman HJ, Assaraf YG. Nanomedicine for targeted cancer therapy: towards the overcoming of drug resistance. Drug Resist Updat. 2011;14(3):150–63.
Shigdar S, Lin J, Yu Y, Pastuovic M, Wei M, Duan W. RNA aptamer against a cancer stem cell marker epithelial cell adhesion molecule. Cancer Sci. 2011;102(5):991–8.
Ranji P, Heydari Z, Alizadeh AM. Nanobiotechnological approaches to overcome drug resistance in breast cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2015;15(7):544–62.
Clevers H. The cancer stem cell: premises, promises and challenges. Nature Med. 2011;313–9.
Chen L, Bourguignon LY. Hyaluronan-CD44 interaction promotes c-Jun signaling and miRNA21 expression leading to Bcl-2 expression and chemoresistance in breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2014;13(1):1.
Gu J, Fang X, Hao J, Sha X. Reversal of P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance by CD44 antibody-targeted nanocomplexes for short hairpin RNA-encoding plasmid DNA delivery. Biomaterials. 2015;45:99–114.
Ebben JD, Treisman DM, Zorniak M, Kutty RG, Clark PA, Kuo JS. The cancer stem cell paradigm: a new understanding of tumor development and treatment. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2010;14(6):621–32.
Aguilar-Gallardo C, Rutledge EC, Martínez-Arroyo AM, Hidalgo JJ, Domingo S, Simón C. Overcoming challenges of ovarian cancer stem cells: novel therapeutic approaches. Stem Cell Rev. 2012;8(3):994–1010.
Bourguignon LY, Earle C, Wong G, Spevak CC, Krueger K. Stem cell marker (Nanog) and Stat-3 signaling promote microRNA-21 expression and chemoresistance in hyaluronan/CD44-activated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2012;31(2):149–60.
Thomas ML, Coyle KM, Sultan M, Vaghar-Kashani A, Marcato P. Chemoresistance in cancer stem cells and strategies to overcome resistance. Chemotherapy: Open Access. 2014;2014.
Jordan AR, Racine RR, Hennig MJ, Lokeshwar VB. The role of CD44 in disease pathophysiology and targeted treatment. Frontiers In Immunol. 2015;6.
Hong SP, Wen J, Bang S, Park S, Song SY. CD44-positive cells are responsible for gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer cells. Inter J Cancer. 2009;125(10):2323–31.
Miletti-González KE, Chen S, Muthukumaran N, Saglimbeni GN, Wu X, Yang J, et al. The CD44 receptor interacts with P-glycoprotein to promote cell migration and invasion in cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65(15):6660–7.
Bourguignon LY, Peyrollier K, Xia W, Gilad E. Hyaluronan-CD44 interaction activates stem cell marker Nanog, Stat-3-mediated MDR1 gene expression, and ankyrin-regulated multidrug efflux in breast and ovarian tumor cells. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(25):17635–51.
Yang X, Singh A, Choy E, Hornicek FJ, Amiji MM, Duan Z. MDR1 siRNA loaded hyaluronic acid-based CD44 targeted nanoparticle systems circumvent paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer. Sci Rep. 2015;5.
Zhong Y, Zhang J, Cheng R, Deng C, Meng F, Xie F, et al. Reversibly crosslinked hyaluronic acid nanoparticles for active targeting and intelligent delivery of doxorubicin to drug resistant CD44+ human breast tumor xenografts. J Control Release. 2015;205:144–54.
Liu Y, Sun J, Lian H, Cao W, Wang Y, He Z. Folate and CD44 receptors dual-targeting hydrophobized hyaluronic acid paclitaxel-loaded polymeric micelles for overcoming multidrug resistance and improving tumor distribution. J Pharm Sci. 2014;103(5):1538–47.
Liu YP, Liu CF, Ma DX, Lu F, Zhang JJ, Kong HL. [Effect of CD44 gene silence on multi-drug resistance reversal and biologic activity in K562/A02 cells]. Zhongguo ShiYan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2010;18(2):335–9.
Opyrchal M, Salisbury JL, Iankov I, Goetz MP, McCubrey J, Gambino MW, et al. Inhibition of Cdk2 kinase activity selectively targets the CD44+/CD24−/low stem-like subpopulation and restores chemosensitivity of SUM149PT triple-negative breast cancer cells. Inter j Oncol. 2014;45(3):1193–9.
Ahmadipour F, Noordin MI, Mohan S, Arya A, Paydar M, Looi CY, et al. Koenimbin, a natural dietary compound of Murraya koenigii (L) Spreng: inhibition of MCF7 breast cancer cells and targeting of derived MCF7 breast cancer stem cells (CD44+/CD24−/low): an in vitro study. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2015;9:1193.
Fargeas CA, Florek M, Huttner WB, Corbeil D. Characterization of prominin-2, a new member of the prominin family of pentaspan membrane glycoproteins. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(10):8586–96.
Dubreuil V, Marzesco A-M, Corbeil D, Huttner WB, Wilsch-Bräuninger M. Midbody and primary cilium of neural progenitors release extracellular membrane particles enriched in the stem cell marker prominin-1. J Cell Biol. 2007;176(4):483–95.
Miraglia S, Godfrey W, Yin AH, Atkins K, Warnke R, Holden JT, et al. A novel five-transmembrane hematopoietic stem cell antigen: isolation, characterization, and molecular cloning. Blood. 1997;90(12):5013–21.
Grosse-Gehling P, Fargeas CA, Dittfeld C, Garbe Y, Alison MR, Corbeil D, et al. CD133 as a biomarker for putative cancer stem cells in solid tumours: limitations, problems and challenges. J Pathol. 2013;229(3):355–78.
Corbeil D, Röper K, Fargeas CA, Joester A, Huttner WB. Prominin: a story of cholesterol, plasma membrane protrusions and human pathology. Traffic. 2001;2(2):82–91.
Weigmann A, Corbeil D, Hellwig A, Huttner WB. Prominin, a novel microvilli-specific polytopic membrane protein of the apical surface of epithelial cells, is targeted to plasmalemmal protrusions of non-epithelial cells. P Natl Acad Sci. 1997;94(23):12425–30.
Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, Squire JA, Bayani J, Hide T, et al. Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature. 2004;432(7015):396–401.
Mak AB, Nixon AM, Kittanakom S, Stewart JM, Chen GI, Curak J, et al. Regulation of CD133 by HDAC6 promotes β-catenin signaling to suppress cancer cell differentiation. Cell Rep. 2012;2(4):951–63.
Chao C, Carmical JR, Ives KL, Wood TG, Aronson JF, Gomez GA, et al. CD133+ colon cancer cells are more interactive with the tumor microenvironment than CD133- cells. Lab Investig. 2012;92(3):420–36.
Shimozato O, Waraya M, Nakashima K, Souda H, Takiguchi N, Yamamoto H, et al. Receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase k directly dephosphorylates CD133 and regulates downstream AKT activation. Oncogene. 2015;34(15):1949–60.
Wei Y, Jiang Y, Zou F, Liu Y, Wang S, Xu N, et al. Activation of PI3K/Akt pathway by CD133-p85 interaction promotes tumorigenic capacity of glioma stem cells. P Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(17):6829–34.
Barr MP, Gray SG, Hoffmann AC, Hilger RA, Thomale J, O’Flaherty JD, et al. Generation and characterisation of cisplatin-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cell lines displaying a stem-like signature. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54193.
Liu Y-P, Yang C-J, Huang M-S, Yeh C-T, Wu AT, Lee Y-C, et al. Cisplatin selects for multidrug-resistant CD133+ cells in lung adenocarcinoma by activating notch signaling. Cancer Res. 2013;73(1):406–16.
Bolderson E, Richard DJ, Zhou B-BS, Khanna KK. Recent advances in cancer therapy targeting proteins involved in DNA double-strand break repair. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(20):6314–20.
Gallmeier E, Hermann PC, Mueller MT, Machado JG, Ziesch A, De Toni EN, et al. Inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia-and Rad3-related function abrogates the in vitro and in vivo tumorigenicity of human colon cancer cells through depletion of the CD133+ tumor-initiating cell fraction. Stem Cells. 2011;29(3):418–29.
Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y, Shi Q, AB H, et al. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature. 2006;444(7120):756–60.
Yeh C-T, Wu AT, Chang PM-H, Chen K-Y, Yang C-N, Yang S-C, et al. Trifluoperazine, an antipsychotic agent, inhibits cancer stem cell growth and overcomes drug resistance of lung cancer. A J Res Crit Care Medicine. 2012;186(11):1180–8.
Skubitz AP, Taras EP, Boylan KL, Waldron NN, Oh S, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, et al. Targeting CD133 in an in vivo ovarian cancer model reduces ovarian cancer progression. Gynecolo Oncol. 2013;130(3):579–87.
Fan X, Matsui W, Khaki L, Stearns D, Chun J, Li Y-M, et al. Notch pathway inhibition depletes stem-like cells and blocks engraftment in embryonal brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2006;66(15):7445–52.
Zhao L, Yang Y, Zhou P, Ma H, Zhao X, He X, et al. Targeting CD133high colorectal cancer cells in vitro and in vivo with an asymmetric bispecific antibody. J Immunother. 2015;38(6):217–28.
Di Cristofori A, Ferrero S, Bertolini I, Gaudioso G, MV R, Berno V, et al. The vacuolar H+ ATPase is a novel therapeutic target for glioblastoma. Oncotarget. 2015;6(19):17514–31.
Lin F, Yan W, Wen T, Wu G. [Metformin induces apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma Huh-7 cells in vitro and its mechanism]. Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese Journal of Oncology]. 2013;35(10):742–6.
Kiyoi H, Naoe T. Biology, clinical relevance, and molecularly targeted therapy in acute leukemia with FLT3 mutation. Inter J hematol. 2006;83(4):301–8.
Linnekin D, Mou S, Deberry CS, Weiler SR, Keller JR, Ruscetti FW, et al. Stem cell factor, the JAK-STAT pathway and signal transduction. Leukemia & lymphoma. 1997;27(5–6):439–44.
Awad AJ, Burns TC, Zhang Y, Abounader R. Targeting MET for glioma therapy. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(6):E10.
Schmoll H-J, Cunningham D, Sobrero A, Karapetis CS, Rougier P, Koski SL, et al. Cediranib with mFOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab with mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomized phase III study (HORIZON III). J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(29):3588–95.
Heinrich MC, Griffith D, McKinley A, Patterson J, Presnell A, Ramachandran A, et al. Crenolanib inhibits the drug-resistant PDGFRA D842V mutation associated with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(16):4375–84.
Andrae J, Gallini R, Betsholtz C. Role of platelet-derived growth factors in physiology and medicine. Gene Dev. 2008;22(10):1276–312.
Hojjat-Farsangi M. Small-molecule inhibitors of the receptor tyrosine kinases: promising tools for targeted cancer therapies. Inter J Mol Sci. 2014;15(8):13768–801.
Xiao Z, Sperl B, Ullrich A, Knyazev P. Metformin and salinomycin as the best combination for the eradication of NSCLC monolayer cells and their alveospheres (cancer stem cells) irrespective of EGFR, KRAS, EML4/ALK and LKB1 status. Oncotarget. 2014;5(24):12877.
Deng R, Wang X, Liu Y, Yan M, Hanada S, Xu Q, et al. A new gamboge derivative compound 2 inhibits cancer stem-like cells via suppressing EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17(11):1422–33.
Dos Santos C, McDonald T, Ho YW, Liu H, Lin A, Forman SJ, et al. The Src and c-Kit kinase inhibitor dasatinib enhances p53-mediated targeting of human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells by chemotherapeutic agents. Blood. 2013;122(11):1900–13.
O’Farrell AM, Yuen HA, Smolich B, Hannah AL, Louie SG, Hong W, et al. Effects of SU5416, a small molecule tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor, on FLT3 expression and phosphorylation in patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 2004;28(7):679–89. doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2003.11.004.
Zhang S, Cui B, Lai H, Liu G, Ghia EM, Widhopf GF, et al. Ovarian cancer stem cells express ROR1, which can be targeted for anti–cancer-stem-cell therapy. P Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(48):17266–71.
Lebron MB, Brennan L, Damoci CB, Prewett MC, O’Mahony M, Duignan IJ, et al. A human monoclonal antibody targeting the stem cell factor receptor (c-Kit) blocks tumor cell signaling and inhibits tumor growth. Cancer Biol & Ther. 2014;15(9):1208–18.
Srikanth M, Das S, Berns EJ, Kim J, Stupp SI, Kessler JA. Nanofiber-mediated inhibition of focal adhesion kinase sensitizes glioma stemlike cells to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition. Neuro-oncol. 2013;15(3):319–29.
Padhye SS, Guin S, Yao H-P, Zhou Y-Q, Zhang R, Wang M-H. Sustained expression of the RON receptor tyrosine kinase by pancreatic cancer stem cells as a potential targeting moiety for antibody-directed chemotherapeutics. Mol Pharma. 2011;8(6):2310–9.
Rath P, Lal B, Ajala O, Li Y, Xia S, Kim J, et al. In vivo c-Met pathway inhibition depletes human glioma xenografts of tumor-propagating stem-like cells. Transl Oncol. 2013;6(2):104–IN1.
Giles FJ, Cooper MA, Silverman L, Karp JE, Lancet JE, Zangari M, et al. Phase II study of SU5416–a small-molecule, vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine-kinase receptor inhibitor–in patients with refractory myeloproliferative diseases. Cancer. 2003;97(8):1920–8. doi:10.1002/cncr.11315.
Stacchiotti S, Negri T, Palassini E, Conca E, Gronchi A, Morosi C, et al. Sunitinib malate and figitumumab in solitary fibrous tumor: patterns and molecular bases of tumor response. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9(5):1286–97. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-09-1205.
Boumendjel A, Macalou S, Valdameri G, Pozza A, Gauthier C, Arnaud O, et al. Targeting the multidrug ABCG2 transporter with flavonoidic inhibitors: in vitro optimization and in vivo validation. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(22):3387–401.
Bhatia A, Schäfer H-J, Hrycyna CA. Oligomerization of the human ABC transporter ABCG2: evaluation of the native protein and chimeric dimers. Biochem. 2005;44(32):10893–904.
Robey RW, Polgar O, Deeken J, To KW, Bates SE. ABCG2: determining its relevance in clinical drug resistance. Cancer and Metastasis Rev. 2007;26(1):39–57.
Diestra JE, Scheffer GL, Catala I, Maliepaard M, Schellens JH, Scheper RJ, et al. Frequent expression of the multi-drug resistance-associated protein BCRP/MXR/ABCP/ABCG2 in human tumours detected by the BXP-21 monoclonal antibody in paraffin-embedded material. J Pathol. 2002;198(2):213–9.
Raaijmakers MH, de Grouw EP, Heuver LH, van der Reijden BA, Jansen JH, Scheffer G, et al. Impaired breast cancer resistance protein mediated drug transport in plasma cells in multiple myeloma. Leukemia Res. 2005;29(12):1455–8.
Turner JG, Gump JL, Zhang C, Cook JM, Marchion D, Hazlehurst L, et al. ABCG2 expression, function, and promoter methylation in human multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006;108(12):3881–9.
Dou J, Jiang C, Wang J, Zhang X, Zhao F, Hu W, et al. Using ABCG2-molecule-expressing side population cells to identify cancer stem-like cells in a human ovarian cell line. Cell Biol Int. 2011;35(3):227–34.
To KK, Tomlinson B. Targeting the ABCG2-overexpressing multidrug resistant (MDR) cancer cells by PPARγ agonists. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;170(5):1137–51.
Wang N, Wang Z, Peng C, You J, Shen J, Han S, et al. Dietary compound isoliquiritigenin targets GRP78 to chemosensitize breast cancer stem cells via β-catenin/ABCG2 signaling. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35(11):2544–54.
Sims-Mourtada J, Izzo J, Ajani J, Chao K. Sonic hedgehog promotes multiple drug resistance by regulation of drug transport. Oncogene. 2007;26(38):5674–9.
Kim JE, Singh RR, Cho-Vega JH, Drakos E, Davuluri Y, Khokhar FA, et al. Sonic hedgehog signaling proteins and ATP-binding cassette G2 are aberrantly expressed in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(10):1312–20.
Singh RR, Kunkalla K, Qu C, Schlette E, Neelapu SS, Samaniego F, et al. ABCG2 is a direct transcriptional target of hedgehog signaling and involved in stroma-induced drug tolerance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Oncogene. 2011;30(49):4874–86.
Eng C. PTEN: one gene, many syndromes. Hum Mutat. 2003;22(3):183–98.
Jang J-Y, Jeon Y-K, Kim C-W. Degradation of HER2/neu by ANT2 shRNA suppresses migration and invasiveness of breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2010;10(1):391.
Jang J-Y, Kim M-K, Jeon Y-K, Joung Y-K, Park K-D, Kim C-W. Adenovirus adenine nucleotide translocator-2 shRNA effectively induces apoptosis and enhances chemosensitivity by the down-regulation of ABCG2 in breast cancer stem-like cells. Exp Mol Med. 2012;44(4):251–9.
Yang C, Xiong F, Dou J, Xue J, Zhan X, Shi F, et al. Target therapy of multiple myeloma by PTX-NPs and ABCG2 antibody in a mouse xenograft model. Oncotarget. 2015;6(29):27714–24.
Peng H, Dong Z, Qi J, Yang Y, Liu Y, Li Z, et al. A novel two mode-acting inhibitor of ABCG2-mediated multidrug transport and resistance in cancer chemotherapy. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5676.
Li YT, Chua MJ, Kunnath AP, Chowdhury EH. Reversing multidrug resistance in breast cancer cells by silencing ABC transporter genes with nanoparticle-facilitated delivery of target siRNAs. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:2473.
Teng Y, Bai M, Sun Y, Wang Q, Li F, Xing J, et al. Enhanced delivery of PEAL nanoparticles with ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction mediated siRNA transfection in human MCF-7/S and MCF-7/ADR cells in vitro. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:5447.
Wei Y, Ma Y, Zhao Q, Ren Z, Li Y, Hou T, et al. New use for an old drug: inhibiting ABCG2 with sorafenib. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11(8):1693–702.
Hou H, Sun H, Lu P, Ge C, Zhang L, Li H, et al. Tunicamycin potentiates cisplatin anticancer efficacy through the DPAGT1/Akt/ABCG2 pathway in mouse xenograft models of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(12):2874–84.
Vogt T, Hafner C, Bross K, Bataille F, Jauch KW, Berand A, et al. Antiangiogenetic therapy with pioglitazone, rofecoxib, and metronomic trofosfamide in patients with advanced malignant vascular tumors. Cancer. 2003;98(10):2251–6. doi:10.1002/cncr.11775.
Thiessen B, Stewart C, Tsao M, Kamel-Reid S, Schaiquevich P, Mason W, et al. A phase I/II trial of GW572016 (lapatinib) in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: clinical outcomes, pharmacokinetics and molecular correlation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;65(2):353–61. doi:10.1007/s00280-009-1041-6.
Sladek NE. Human aldehyde dehydrogenases: potential pathological, pharmacological, and toxicological impact. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2003;17(1):7–23.
Black WJ, Stagos D, Marchitti SA, Nebert DW, Tipton KF, Bairoch A, et al. Human aldehyde dehydrogenase genes: alternatively-spliced transcriptional variants and their suggested nomenclature. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2009;19(11):893.
Ma I, Allan AL. The role of human aldehyde dehydrogenase in normal and cancer stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 2011;7(2):292–306.
Tanei T, Morimoto K, Shimazu K, Kim SJ, Tanji Y, Taguchi T, et al. Association of breast cancer stem cells identified by aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 expression with resistance to sequential paclitaxel and epirubicin-based chemotherapy for breast cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(12):4234–41.
Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Dutcher J, Brown M, et al. ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1(5):555–67.
Moreb JS, Muhoczy D, Ostmark B, Zucali JR. RNAi-mediated knockdown of aldehyde dehydrogenase class-1A1 and class-3A1 is specific and reveals that each contributes equally to the resistance against 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007;59(1):127–36.
Marchitti SA, Brocker C, Stagos D, Vasiliou V. Non-P450 aldehyde oxidizing enzymes: the aldehyde dehydrogenase superfamily. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2008;4(6):697–720.
Krause U, Ryan D, Clough B, Gregory C. An unexpected role for a Wnt-inhibitor: Dickkopf-1 triggers a novel cancer survival mechanism through modulation of aldehyde-dehydrogenase-1 activity. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5(2):e1093.
Golubovskaya V, O’Brien S, Ho B, Heffler M, Conroy J, Hu Q, et al. Down-regulation of ALDH1A3, CD44 or MDR1 sensitizes resistant cancer cells to FAK autophosphorylation inhibitor Y15. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;1–19.
Li S-Y, Sun R, Wang H-X, Shen S, Liu Y, Du X-J, et al. Combination therapy with epigenetic-targeted and chemotherapeutic drugs delivered by nanoparticles to enhance the chemotherapy response and overcome resistance by breast cancer stem cells. J Control Release. 2015;205:7–14.
Bertrand G, Maalouf M, Boivin A, Battiston-Montagne P, Beuve M, Levy A, et al. Targeting head and neck cancer stem cells to overcome resistance to photon and carbon ion radiation. Stem Cell Rev. 2014;10(1):114–26.
Xu Y, Wang J, Li X, Liu Y, Dai L, Wu X, et al. Selective inhibition of breast cancer stem cells by gold nanorods mediated plasmonic hyperthermia. Biomaterials. 2014;35(16):4667–77.
Tallman MS, Andersen JW, Schiffer CA, Appelbaum FR, Feusner JH, Ogden A, et al. All-trans-retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(15):1021–8.
Budd GT, Adamson PC, Gupta M, Homayoun P, Sandstrom SK, Murphy RF, et al. Phase I/II trial of all-trans retinoic acid and tamoxifen in patients with advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4(3):635–42.
An H, Kim JY, Lee N, Cho Y, Oh E, Seo JH. Salinomycin possesses anti-tumor activity and inhibits breast cancer stem-like cells via an apoptosis-independent pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;466(4):696–703.
Kubo M, Kanaya N, Petrossian K, Ye J, Warden C, Liu Z, et al. Inhibition of the proliferation of acquired aromatase inhibitor-resistant breast cancer cells by histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 (panobinostat). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137(1):93–107.
Pandrangi SL, Chikati R, Chauhan PS, Kumar CS, Banarji A, Saxena S. Effects of ellipticine on ALDH1A1-expressing breast cancer stem cells—an in vitro and in silico study. Tumor Biol. 2014;35(1):723–37.
Jokinen E, Laurila N, Koivunen P, Koivunen JP. Combining targeted drugs to overcome and prevent resistance of solid cancers with some stem-like cell features. Oncotarget. 2014;5(19):9295–307.
Grishina O, Schmoor C, Dohner K, Hackanson B, Lubrich B, May AM, et al. DECIDER: prospective randomized multicenter phase II trial of low-dose decitabine (DAC) administered alone or in combination with the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in patients >60 years with acute myeloid leukemia who are ineligible for induction chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:430. doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1432-5.
Munz M, Baeuerle PA, Gires O. The emerging role of EpCAM in cancer and stem cell signaling. Cancer Res. 2009;69(14):5627–9.
Baeuerle P, Gires O. EpCAM (CD326) finding its role in cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007;96(3):417–23.
van der Gun BT, Melchers LJ, Ruiters MH, de Leij LF, McLaughlin PM, Rots MG. EpCAM in carcinogenesis: the good, the bad or the ugly. Carcinog. 2010;31(11):1913–21.
Maetzel D, Denzel S, Mack B, Canis M, Went P, Benk M, et al. Nuclear signalling by tumour-associated antigen EpCAM. Nature cell Biol. 2009;11(2):162–71.
Schnell U, Kuipers J, Giepmans BN. EpCAM proteolysis: new fragments with distinct functions? Biosci Rep. 2013;33(2):e00030.
Lu T-Y, Lu R-M, Liao M-Y, Yu J, Chung C-H, Kao C-F, et al. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule regulation is associated with the maintenance of the undifferentiated phenotype of human embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chemist. 2010;285(12):8719–32.
Münz M, Murr A, Kvesic M, Rau D, Mangold S, Pflanz S, et al. Side-by-side analysis of five clinically tested anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Cell Int. 2010;10(1):1.
Lund K, Bostad M, Skarpen E, Braunagel M, Kiprijanov S, Krauss S, et al. The novel EpCAM-targeting monoclonal antibody 3–17I linked to saporin is highly cytotoxic after photochemical internalization in breast, pancreas and colon cancer cell lines. MAbs. 2014;6(4):1038–50.
Salnikov AV, Groth A, Apel A, Kallifatidis G, Beckermann BM, Khamidjanov A, et al. Targeting of cancer stem cell marker EpCAM by bispecific antibody EpCAMxCD3 inhibits pancreatic carcinoma. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(9b):4023–33.
Simon M, Stefan N, Plückthun A, Zangemeister-Wittke U. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule-targeted drug delivery for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013;10(4):451–68.
Song K-M, Lee S, Ban C. Aptamers and their biological applications. Sensors. 2012;12(1):612–31.
Subramanian N, Kanwar JR, Kanwar RK, Sreemanthula J, Biswas J, Khetan V, et al. EpCAM aptamer-siRNA chimera targets and regress epithelial cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132407.
Wang T, Gantier MP, Xiang D, Bean AG, Bruce M, Zhou S-F, et al. EpCAM aptamer-mediated survivin silencing sensitized cancer stem cells to doxorubicin in a breast cancer model. Theranostics. 2015;5(12):1456.
Zhan Q, Wang C, Ngai S. Ovarian cancer stem cells: a new target for cancer therapy. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013.
Alizadeh AM, Shiri S, Farsinejad S. Metastasis review: from bench to bedside. Tumor Biol. 2014;35(9):8483–523.
Acknowledgments
This study was founded by Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Grant Number 26012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The author(s) report no conflicts of interest and are responsible for the content of the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ranji, P., Salmani Kesejini, T., Saeedikhoo, S. et al. Targeting cancer stem cell-specific markers and/or associated signaling pathways for overcoming cancer drug resistance. Tumor Biol. 37, 13059–13075 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-5294-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-5294-5