Abstract
Water and post-larvae samples from black tiger (Penaeus monodon) shrimp hatcheries; pond water, pond sediment and shrimp from aquaculture farms were screened for the presence of V. cholerae. A V. cholerae-duplex PCR method was developed by utilizing V. cholerae species specific sodB primers and ctxAB genes specific primers. Incidence of V. cholerae was not observed in shrimp hatchery samples but was noticed in aquaculture samples. The incidence of V. cholerae was higher in pond water (7.6%) than in pond sediment (5.2%). Shrimp head (3.6%) portion had relatively higher incidence than shrimp muscle (1.6%). All the V. cholerae isolates (n = 42) belonged to non-O1/non-O139 serogroup, of which 7% of the V. cholerae isolates were potentially cholera-toxigenic (ctx positive). All the ctx positive V. cholerae (n = 3) were isolated from the pond water. Since, cholera toxin (CT) is the major contributing factor for cholera gravis, it is proposed that the mere presence of non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae need not be the biohazard criterion in cultured black tiger shrimp but only the presence of ctx carrying non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae may be considered as potential public health risk.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The genus Vibrio is a member of the family Vibrionaeceae and consists of 44 recognized species of which 12 species occur in human clinical specimens (Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 2005). V. cholerae O1 is the causative agent of pandemic cholera. V cholerae O139 (the Bengal strain) was reported as another cause of cholera (Ramamurthy et al. 1993). The epidemic causing strains of V. cholerae (O1 or O139 serogroups) produce cholera toxin (CT) which is the major contributing factor for profuse diarrohea (cholera gravis) characterized by severe diarrohea with rice water stools, devastating dehydration and electrolyte imbalance. V. cholerae non-O1 serogroups are widely distributed in the aquatic environment and are free living in nature. Strains of non-O1 V. cholerae greatly outnumber O1 strains in the environment and majority of these isolates lack the classical virulence factors such as cholera toxin and toxin co-regulated pilus.
Cholera Toxin (CT) encoded by ctxAB is responsible for the severe diarroheal symptoms elicited by V. cholerae (Kaper et al. 1995). CT is a potent A-B type exotoxin composed of 5 B subunits (ctxB) which binds holotoxin to the cell receptor and one A subunit (ctxA) which provides intracellularly toxigenic activity. V. cholerae O1 strains and O139 strains produce CT (Nair and Takeda 1993) but the expression of CT is rare in other serogroups of V. cholerae non-O1 (Said et al. 1994). However, there are atypical environmental strains that possess the ctx gene (Nair et al. 1988; Rivera et al. 2001). The toxigenic O139 serogroups having arisen from recombination with toxigenic O1 strains (Faruque et al. 2000b) and it has been hypothesized that V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 strains can acquire genes for toxin production by transduction and might be the source of new epidemics.
PCR methods that target a single gene/sequence, multiple genes within V. cholerae, or two or more pathogens in a single PCR assay have been used by several researchers (Brasher et al. 1998; Bacteriological Analytical Manual 2001; Singh et al. 2002; Jing et al. 2003; Karunasagar et al. 2003; Panicker et al. 2004a; Fraga et al. 2007; Tarr et al. 2007; Khuntia et al. 2008). Tarr et al. (2007) developed a multiplex PCR for V. vulnificus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. mimicus and V. cholerae wherein the intra-specific variation in the conserved housekeeping gene viz., sodB was used as a source of marker for V. cholerae and as the house keeping genes are invariably present in all isolates this PCR method helps in the detection of all V. cholerae isolates irrespective of their toxigenic status. An effective PCR method for detecting enterotoxigenic Vibrio cholerae in food samples was described in Bacteriological Analytical Manual (2001). This PCR selectively amplifies a specific DNA fragment within the ctxAB operon of V. cholerae and detects only cholera toxin producing V. cholerae but does not provide information on non-cholera-toxigenic V. cholerae. A duplex-PCR that detects all V. cholerae isolates and simultaneously provides information on the choleratoxigenic potential is essential for risk analysis of food.
Cultured shrimp, mainly the black tiger shrimp (P. monodon) constitutes a major portion of Indian fishery export. During the year 2007–08, a total of 1,06,165 MT of shrimp was produced from a culture area of 1,22,078.80 ha (MPEDA 2008). Cultured shrimp processing waste is also a rich source for important by-products like chitin and carotenoids (Raghu et al. 2008). The importance of V. cholerae in the P. monodon aquaculture is mainly as a biological hazard that compromises post-harvest quality and leads to rejections from the importing countries. Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) of the European Union has issued alert notifications for the presence of either V. cholerae or V. cholerae non O1/non-O139 in frozen black tiger shrimp (P. monodon) imported by the European Union (EU) countries from shrimp exporting countries including India (http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/rapidalert/rasff_portal_database_en.htm).
The present study was taken up to screen samples from shrimp aquaculture system for potential cholera-toxigenic V. cholerae, develop a duplex-PCR method for the simultaneous detection of V. cholerae and differentiation of cholera toxin producing V. cholerae and determine the effect of fish and crustacean meats on the performance of the duplex-PCR.
Materials and methods
Samples from shrimp culture system
Water (n = 7) and post-larvae (n = 7) samples from seven Penaeus monodon (black tiger) shrimp hatcheries; pond water (n = 5), pond sediment (n = 5) and shrimp samples (n = 5) from five P. monodon aquaculture farms on the East Coast of India were screened.
Isolation and identification of V. cholerae
Thiosulfate Citrate Bile Sucrose Agar (TCBS Agar) was used for isolating vibrios. Serial ten fold dilutions of shrimp muscle, shrimp head, pond sediment and pond water were spread plated on TCBS agar, incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The sucrose fermenting colonies on the TCBS plates were purified by streak dilution and identified to the species level by using the identification scheme of Noguerola and Blanch (2008). Isolates that were arginine dihydrolase negative, lysine decarboxylase positive, ornithine decarboxylase positive, indole positive, ONPG test positive, showed growth at 0%NaCl positive, growth at 8%NaCl negative, produced acid from sucrose were identified as V. cholerae. The V. cholerae isolates identified by the above mentioned schemes were confirmed by performing the tests described for V. cholerae species identification (Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 2005).
E.coli
Tergitol seven agar was used to determine E.coli counts and final counts were arrived after confirmation on Eosin Methylene Blue agar and by performing indole, methyl red, Voges-Proskauer and citrate (IMVC) tests.
Slide agglutination test for V. cholerae O1 and V. cholerae O139 and V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139
V. cholerae isolates were initially tested with polyvalent somatic O antiserum (Difco Vibrio cholerae antiserum Poly [Hikojima, Inaba, Ogawa], Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lanes, NJ, USA) and the isolates that gave positive agglutination reaction were classified as V. cholerae O1. Cultures that gave negative reaction with polyvalent somatic O antiserum were further tested for agglutination using V. cholerae O139 antiserum (V. cholerae antiserum O139 Bengal, Denka Seiken Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and those V. cholerae cultures that gave positive agglutination reaction were classified as V. cholerae O139. V. cholerae cultures that gave negative reaction both with polyvalent somatic O antiserum and O139 antiserum were classified as V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139.
PCR
PCR for the detection of V. cholerae using species specific primers (Tarr et al. 2007) was performed using 1 μl of each sodB (Table 1) primer (10 μM stock) in a final PCR reaction volume of 20 μl. V. cholerae yield an amplicon of 248 bp. PCR for the detection of enterotoxigenic V. cholerae was performed (Bacteriological Analytical Manual 2001) using ctx primers (Table 1) at 0.5 μM concentration of each primer and 3% (v/v) APW lysate as template. ctxAB positive V. cholerae cultures yield an amplicon of 777 bp. PCR for V. cholerae O1 and V. cholerae O139 was performed as per Hoshino et al. (1998) using O1F2-1 and O1R2-2 primers (V. cholerae O1-rfb specific primers) and O139F2 and O139R2 primers (O139-rfb specific primers) (Table 1). V. cholerae O1 cultures yield an amplicon 192 bp whereas V. cholerae O139 cultures yield an amplicon 449 bp. V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 cultures do not yield any of these amplicons. V. cholerae (MTCC 3906), V. vulnificus (MTCC 1145), V. alginolyticus (ATCC 17749) and V. parahaemolyticus (ATCC 17802) cultures were used for standardizing the PCR reactions.
Duplex PCR for the simultaneous detection of V. cholerae and differentiation of cholera toxin producing V. cholerae isolates (V. cholerae-duplex PCR)
A V. cholerae-duplex PCR method was developed by utilizing V. cholerae species specific sodB primers (Tarr et al. 2007) and ctxAB genes specific primers (Bacteriological Analytical Manual 2001). This method was designed to detect V. cholerae isolates and differentiate ctx toxin producing strains.
V. cholerae-duplex PCR reaction conditions
One ml of V. cholerae culture (24 h at 37 °C) grown in T1N1 (Tryptone 1%, NaCl 1%) was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer, placed in a dry bath for 5 min at 95 °C and the crude lysate was used as template. The PCR amplification reactions were performed in a final volume of 20 μl. Each reaction mixture contained 0.5 μM each of PCR species specific primers, 0.5 μM each of ctxAB primers, 18 μl of master reaction mix containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3; 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM each dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP, 1 U of Taq polymerase and 1.2 μl of crude lysate. PCR reaction was carried out in Minicycler (Minicycler PTC-150, MJ Research, MA, USA) programmed to perform a denaturation step at 93 °C for 15 min, followed by 35 cycles consisting of 40 s at 92 °C, 1 min at 57 °C and 1.5 min at 72 °C. The last extension step was extended to 7 min longer. Agarose gel analysis of V. cholerae-duplex PCR products (Sambrook and Russell 2001) was carried out by loading 10 μl of the PCR product in a 2% agarose gel containing 1 μg/ml Ethidium bromide in TAE buffer and electrophoresed. After appropriate migration with constant voltage of 5–10 V/cm (Electrophoresis Powerpack, Bangalore Genei, India) the agarose gel was scanned using a gel documentation system (Alpha Imager, Alpha Innotech Corporation, USA). V. cholerae cultures yield 248 bp amplicon; ctxAB positive V. cholerae cultures yield two amplicons viz., 248 bp and 777 bp.
End point dilution of V. cholerae-duplex PCR
The sensitivity of V. cholerae-duplex PCR was determined by making serial 10 fold dilutions of V. cholerae culture (grown in T1N1, incubated for 24 h at 37 °C) in normal saline ranging from undiluted to 10−6 viz., 106 V. cholerae cells, 105 V. cholerae cells, 104 V. cholerae cells, 103 V. cholerae cells, 100 V. cholerae cells, 10 V. cholerae cells and 1 V. cholerae cell. From each tube, 1 ml was withdrawn for template preparation and subjected to V. cholerae-duplex PCR.
Suitability of V. cholerae-duplex PCR in detecting V. cholerae in fish and crustaceans samples
Freshwater fish (carp, Labeo rohita), marine fish (tuna, Euthynnus affinis), black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) and three spot crab (Portunus sangulnolentus) meats were used. All the food matrices were initially tested negative for the presence of V. cholerae. Fish, shrimp or crab meat (25 g) was homogenized with sterile alkaline peptone water (225 ml) and spiked with known number of V. cholerae (ctx positive) cells (106 cells) and incubated at 37 °C. The samples were drawn after 18 h of incubation for PCR analysis.
Results and discussion
Vibrio loads in shrimp hatchery and farm samples
Vibrio loads were higher in P. monodon hatchery samples than in aquaculture farm samples (Table 2). Shrimp post-larvae had maximum loads of Vibrios (2.1 × 105 CFU/g). Shrimp head portion had relatively higher counts of Vibrios (3.5 × 104 CFU /g) than shrimp muscle portion (1.4 × 104 CFU /g). Hatchery waters had higher Vibrio loads (2400 CFU /ml) than farm waters (150 CFU /ml). Sucrose non-fermenting Vibrios were higher in shrimp head portion (59%) and hatchery waters (51%) whereas more than 90% of the Vibrios in post-larvae, pond water, pond sediment and shrimp muscle portions were sucrose fermenters. Gomez-Gil et al. (1998) reported that Vibrio spp. isolated from the digestive tract of a population of healthy juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei consisted of both sucrose and non-sucrose fermenters whereas the haemolymph contained only non-sucrose fermenters.
Incidence of V. cholerae in shrimp hatchery and farm samples
Two hundred ten Vibrio cultures isolated from water (n = 105) and post-larvae (n = 105) samples from shrimp hatcheries; 250 Vibrio cultures isolated and purified from pond water (n = 75), pond sediment (n = 75) and shrimp (n = 100) from aquaculture farms were screened for the presence of Vibrio species. Incidence of V. cholerae was not observed in shrimp hatchery samples as none of the 210 Vibrio cultures obtained from hatchery water or post-larvae were identified as V. cholerae. However, a total of 42 vibrio isolates out of the 250 vibrio cultures obtained from shrimp aquaculture samples were identified as V. cholerae by biochemical tests. The incidence of V. cholerae was higher in pond water (7.6%) than in pond sediment (5.2%). Shrimp head (3.6%) portion had relatively higher incidence of V. cholerae than shrimp muscle (1.6%). The incidence of V. cholerae in pond water, pond sediment, shrimp head portion and shrimp muscle as a percentage of the total V. cholerae isolates (n = 42) was 45.2%, 31%, 14.3% and 9.5%, respectively (Table 2). All the V. cholerae isolates obtained from shrimp aquaculture system were grouped as V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 as they yielded negative agglutination results with polyvalent somatic O antiserum and O139 antiserum. All these V. cholerae isolates yielded the specific amplicon (248 bp) in the PCR employing sodB primers thereby confirming their identity as V. cholerae (Fig. 1). Three V. cholerae isolates were positive in the PCR employing ctxAB primers and yielded a single specific amplicon of 777 bp size. V. cholerae was absent but non-01 serotype V. cholerae was reported from Penaeus monodon ponds in India (Otta et al. 1999).
V. cholerae-duplex PCR method for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of choleratoxigenic V. cholerae
In this study a V. cholerae-duplex PCR method was developed by utilizing V. cholerae species specific (Tarr et al. 2007) and ctxAB genes specific primers (Bacteriological Analytical Manual 2001). The reason for selecting the ctxAB and sodB primers for developing V. cholerae -duplex PCR was that the annealing temperatures for the ctxAB primers (55 °C) and sodB primers (57 °C) were nearer. This method was designed to detect V. cholerae isolates and simultaneously differentiate ctx toxin producing strains.
PCR amplification cycle conditions for the ctxAB primers was 34 cycles consisting of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 55 °C and 1 min at 72 °C. The thermal cycling profile for the sodB primers was 35 cycles consisting of 40 s at 92 °C, 1 min at 57 °C and 1.5 min at 72 °C. The primer annealing condition of 1 min at 57 °C was used in this V. cholerae -duplex PCR. A simple template preparation procedure as mentioned in material and methods was used for the V. cholerae -duplex PCR. The crude lysate of V. cholerae culture was found sufficient for obtaining specific result in the V. cholerae -duplex PCR method. The V. cholerae -duplex PCR was initially standardized using V. cholerae (MTCC 3906), V. vulnificus (MTCC 1145), V. alginolyticus (ATCC 17749) and V. parahaemolyticus (ATCC 17802) cultures and ctx negative V. cholerae (laboratory culture collection) cultures. V. cholerae (ctx negative) cultures yielded a single amplicon (248 bp) whereas ctxAB positive V. cholerae cultures yielded two amplicons (248 bp and 777 bp). Other Vibrio species did not yield the V. cholerae specific amplicon. The results indicate that the V. cholerae -duplex PCR was specific to V. cholerae and the PCR cycle conditions were adequate for obtaining the desired result.
All the 42 V. cholerae isolates obtained from shrimp aquaculture system were subjected to V. cholerae -duplex PCR. Thirty nine V. cholerae cultures yielded a single amplicon of 248 bp indicating that they were V. cholerae but non-choleratoxigenic. Three V. cholerae cultures yielded two amplicons viz., species specific 248 bp and cholera toxin specific 777 bp, thereby indicating that they were cholera toxin producing strains of V. cholerae (Fig. 2). The specificity of the V. cholerae -duplex PCR was confirmed by screening the remaining 208 Vibrios cultures isolated from aquaculture ponds. None of the samples yielded the specific amplicons in V. cholerae -duplex PCR indicating the specificity of V. cholerae -duplex PCR. The V. cholerae -duplex PCR and the dichotomous scheme of Noguerola and Blanch (2008) yielded the same result; in both the cases the same cultures were identified as V. cholerae.
V. cholerae was not detected in shrimp hatchery water and post-larvae. The results indicate that, even though V. cholerae was detected in shrimp pond sediment, shrimp head and shrimp muscle samples majority of the isolates were found to be non-choleratoxigenic as the isolates did not yield the ctxAB specific amplicon in V. cholerae -duplex PCR. Only 7% of the V. cholerae isolates (three isolates) were potentially cholera-toxigenic (Table 2). These three V. cholerae isolates were obtained from pond water and they agglutinated neither with polyclonal somatic O antiserum nor with O139 antiserum; thereby grouping them as V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 serogroup. These three isolates failed to yield O1 specific or O139 specific amplicon when tested in PCR (Fig. 3) reconfirming that the isolates were indeed V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139. The faecal indicator, E. coli was detected in aquaculture farms but not in shrimp hatchery samples and the mean E. coli levels were high in pond water (123 ± 87 CFU/g) than in shrimp head (16 ± 16.7 CFU/g) and shrimp muscle (12 ± 11 CFU/g). This may suggest that the ctx positive V. cholerae in pond water might have entered through faecal pollution either through the source water or through feed. Farm made feeds were reported positive for V. cholerae (Raghavan 2003). However, pond sediment samples had higher mean E. coli levels (204 ± 133 CFU/g) than pond water (123 ± 87 CFU/g) but ctx positive V. cholerae could not be isolated from these sources which suggests that the relationship between faecal bacteria and presence of ctx positive V. cholerae is non-existent. A negative correlation was observed between total vibrio counts and E. coli (r = −0.54) in the shrimp culture system. The incidence of V. cholerae observed in aquaculture ponds might also have been due to natural inhabitation. The autochthonous existence of V. cholerae in environment has been previously reported by several researchers (Colwell et al. 1981; Lee et al. 1982). Moreover, the presence of V. cholerae could not be correlated with faecal indicators (Hood and Ness 1982; Filetici et al. 1997).
The structural genes for the ctx element reside on a filamentous phage ctxФ (Waldor and Mekalanos 1996). CTXФ is found in all epidemic V. cholerae isolates but is rarely recovered from the non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae environmental isolates. A DNA probe study showed that a small percentage of environmental strains of V. cholerae non-O1 have the ctx gene (Nair et al. 1988). Virulence genes including ctxAB were found among environmental strains from Calcutta, India (Chakraborty et al. 2000). Occurrence of ctxA was found among 10% on non-O1/non-O139 environmental isolates from Brazil (Rivera et al. 2001). Clinical toxigenic V. cholerae isolates are closely related to non-toxigenic environmental strains (Jiang et al. 2000) and CT genes are highly mobile among environmental isolates. The spread of CT genes in the environment can be facilitated by the exposure of CTXФ positive strains to sunlight (Faruque et al. 2000a). Genetic and phenotypic evidence strongly suggests that the O139 strain arose from a V. cholerae O1 strain by horizontal gene transfer (Bik et al. 1995; Comstock et al. 1996; Waldor and Mekalanos 1994; Faruque et al. 2000b). Similarly, V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 strains can also acquire toxigenic genes for toxin production by transduction and therefore might be the source of new epidemics. Hypothesis of the existence of a TCP-independent mechanism for infection by CTXФ was proposed by Jiang et al. (2003). The choleratoxigenic V. cholerae (non-O1/non-O139) isolated from shrimp aquaculture system showed greater genetic similarity with ctx negative V. cholerae than amongst ctx positive V. cholerae (Rao and Surendran 2010).
Keeping these in view, the screening of environmental and food samples for the presence of ctx positive V. cholerae, especially within the non-O1/ non-O139 serogroup, is of paramount importance. The V. cholerae duplex-PCR method developed in this study would be a useful tool to screen for ctx positive V. cholerae. Even though the existence of ctx carrying non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae isolates was very low in shrimp culture system, the ecological significance of ctx genes among these V. cholerae non-O1 and non- O139 isolates in the shrimp aquaculture environment needs to be further investigated. Study on the expression of ctx gene by the ctx positive non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae was not performed. Additional study on the expression of ctx genes would unravel the ecological significance of ctx genes in non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae
The autochthonous existence of non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae in aquatic environment has been reported from several areas world over. Non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae appears to constitute part of the microflora of prawns (Nair et al. 1991) and oysters (McIntyre et al. 1979; Salamaso et al. 1980). While, non-O1/O139 V. cholerae may be occasionally found in shrimp, there is no known risk of cholera associated with these serotypes in shrimp. Risk assessments by FAO/WHO presented a very small risk of acquiring cholera through consumption of imported warmwater shrimp (FAO/WHO 2005). However, RASFF alert notifications (numbers: 2005.778, 2008.AXE, 2008.BDH) were issued for the presence of non-O1/O139 V. cholerae in black tiger shrimps exported from India. (http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/rapidalert/rasff_portal_database_en.htm). The biohazard status of non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae which appears to be autochthonous bacterial flora in the black tiger shrimp culture system needs to be reassessed. It is proposed that the mere presence of V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 in cultured black tiger shrimp need not be considered as the criterion for biohazard leading to rejection of shrimp exports but ctx carrying V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 may be considered potential public health risk. However, further studies are needed to establish V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 as native flora of black tiger shrimp culture system. Other virulence factors associated with V.cholerae are tcpA, hlyA, zot, ace, rtxA, etc. Fraga et al. (2007) reported that V. cholerae isolates from the environment lacked ctxA and tcpA but contained hlyA (98·7%), rtxA (99·0%), toxR (98·7%) and stn-sto (1·9%) The present study did not search for other virulence genes and further studies on the prevalence of these genes in ctx positive non-O1/non-O139 would aid in risk assessment.
The sensitivity of V. cholerae-duplex PCR was determined using templates prepared from different V. cholerae cell concentrations. The ctxAB specific primers yielded an amplicon only when the concentration of V. cholerae cells was 1000 V. cholerae cells/ml and above whereas the species specific sodB primers yielded an amplicon at a concentration as low as 100 V. cholerae cells/ml. The intensity and thickness of both the amplicon bands decreased with decrease in V. cholerae cell numbers. The sensitivity attained was similar that of reported sensitivities for multiplex PCR. The sensitivity of the multiplex PCR for the detection of V. cholerae targeting ctxA, ace, zot, tcpA and toxR was 102 CFU/ml (Jing et al. 2003). The sensitivity of multiplex PCR for the detection of toxigenic and pathogenic V. cholerae from direct water sources using specific primers targeting ompW, ctxB, rfbG, zot and tcpB was 5 × 104 V. cholerae cells per reaction (Goel et al. 2007). A duplex PCR targeting the genes gyrB and tl for specific identification of V. parahaemolyticus could detect as few as 250 CFU/ml in pure cultures (Vongxay et al. 2006). In the multiplex PCR (vvh fragment and viuB) for V. vulnificus, the sensitivity of detection for both targeted genes was 10 pg of purified DNA, which correlated with 103 CFU/ml of pure culture (Panicker et al. 2004b)
The suitability of V. cholerae-duplex PCR in detecting V. cholerae in fish (rohu, tuna) and crustaceans (black tiger shrimp, three spot crab) samples was studied to know whether inhibitory substances present in these foods might adversely affect the performance of PCR. All the above mentioned food matrices did not show any inhibitory effect on V. cholera duplex-PCR as all the spiked samples yielded the V. cholerae species specific amplicon and ctx specific amplicon (Fig. 4). The specificity of the V. cholerae duplex-PCR is further strengthened by the fact that the primers yielded the specific amplicon even in the presence of initial resident Vibrio populations ranging between 60 CFU /g and 4.6 × 104 CFU/g in these food matrices (Table 3). The V. cholerae duplex-PCR can be of use in the post-harvest quality analysis of fish and crustaceans.
In this study, we studied the incidence of V. cholerae in black tiger shrimp aquaculture system and detected non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae in aquaculture samples but not in hatchery samples. Seven percent of the non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae isolates were potentially cholera-toxigenic. This work reports a new method viz., V. cholerae-duplex PCR method by utilizing V. cholerae species specific sodB primers and ctxAB genes specific primers. V. cholerae duplex-PCR may be particularly usefulness in the risk assessment of fish and shrimp as V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 strains can acquire toxigenic genes for toxin production and therefore might be the source of new epidemics.
References
Bacteriological Analytical Manual (2001) Detection of Enterotoxigenic Vibrio cholerae in foods by the Polymerase Chain Reaction. US Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/Food/ScienceResearch/LaboratoryMethods/BacteriologicalAnalyticalManualBAM/default.htm (accessed 7 Aug 2002)
Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (2005) In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds) 2nd edn, volume 2, part B. Springer, New York, pp 491–546
Bik EM, Bunschoten AE, Gouw RD, Mooi FR (1995) Genesis of the novel epidemic Vibrio cholerae O139 strain: evidence for horizontal transfer of genes involved in polysaccharide synthesis. EMBO J 14:209–216
Brasher CW, DePaola A, Jones DD, Bej AK (1998) Detection of microbial pathogens in shellfish with multiplex PCR. Curr Microbiol 37:101–107. doi:10.1007/s002849900346
Chakraborty S, Mukhopadhyay AK, Bhadra RK, Ghosh AN, Mitra R, Shimada T, Yamasaki S, Faruque SM, Takeda Y, Colwell RR, Nair GB (2000) Virulence genes in environmental strains of Vibrio cholerae. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4022–4028
Colwell RR, Seidler RJ, Kaper J, Joseph SW, Garges S, Lockman H, Maneval D, Bradford H, Roberts N, Remmers E, Huq I, Huq A (1981) Occurrence of Vibrio cholerae serotype O1 in Maryland and Louisiana estuaries. Appl Environ Microbiol 41:555–558
Comstock LE, Johnson JA, Michalski JM, Morris JG Jr, Kaper JB (1996) Cloning and sequence of a region encoding a surface polysaccharide of Vibrio cholerae O139 and characterization of the insertion site in the chromosome of Vibrio cholerae O1. Mol Microbiol 19:815–826. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.407928.x
FAO / WHO (2005) Risk assessment of choleragenic Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139 in warm water shrimp for international trade: interpretative summary and technical report. Microbiological risk assessment series No. 9. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome; WHO, Geneva
Faruque SM, Saha Asadulghani MN, Rahman MM, Waldor MK, Sack DA (2000a) Sunlight-induced propagation of the lysogenic phage encoding cholera toxin. Infect Immun 68:4795–4801
Faruque SM, Saha Asadulghani MN, Sack DA, Sack RB, Takeda Y, Nair GB (2000b) The O139 serogroup of Vibrio cholerae comprises diverse clones of epidemic and non-epidemic strains derived from multiple V. cholerae O1 or non-O1 progenitors. J Infect Dis 182:1161–1168. doi:10.1086/315807
Filetici E, Bonadonna L, Ciccozzi M, Anastasio MP, Fantasia M, Shimada T (1997) Phenotypic and genotypic biotyping of environmental strains of Vibrio cholerae Non-O1 isolated in Italy. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4102–4106
Fraga SG, Pichel M, Costagliola M, Cecilia M, Jurquiza V, Peressutti S, Caffer MI, Aulet O, Hozbor C, Tracanna BC, de Gamundi AV, Hernández D, Ramírez FC, Akselman R, Binsztein N (2007) Environment and virulence factors of Vibrio cholerae strains isolated in Argentina. J Appl Microbiol 103:2448–2456. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03468.x
Goel AK, Ponmariappa S, Kamboj DV, Singh L (2007) Single multiplex Polymerase chain reaction for environmental surveillance of toxigenic–pathogenic O1 and Non-O1 Vibrio cholerae. Folia Microbiol 52:81–85
Gomez-Gil B, Tron-Mayen L, Roque A, Turnbull JF, Inglis V, Guerra-Flores AL (1998) Species of Vibrio isolated from hepatopancreas, haemolymph and digestive tract of a population of healthy juvenile Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 163:1–9. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00162-8
Hood MA, Ness GE (1982) Survival of Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli in Estuarine waters and sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:578–584
Hoshino K, Yamasaki S, Mukhopadhyay AK, Chakraborty S, Basu A, Bhattacharya SK, Nair GB, Shimada T, Takeda Y (1998) Development and evaluation of a multiplex PCR assay for rapid detection of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 20:201–207
Jiang SC, Matte M, Matte G, Huq A, Colwell RR (2000) Genetic diversity of clinical and environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:148–153
Jiang S, Chu W, Fu W (2003) Prevalence of Cholera Toxin Genes (ctxA and zot) among Non-O1/O139 Vibrio cholerae strains from Newport Bay, California. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:7541–7544
Jing L, Chen J, Wang S (2003) Detection of the Virulence-associated Genes in Vibrio cholerae by Multiplex PCR Assay. J Environ Health 20:361–363
Kaper JB, Morris JG Jr, Levine MM (1995) Cholera. Clin Microbiol Rev 8:48–86
Karunasagar I, Rivera I, Joseph B, Kennedy B, Shetty V, Huq A, Karunasagar I, Colwell RR (2003) omp U genes in non-toxigenic Vibrio cholerae associated with aquaculture. J Appl Microbiol 95:338–343. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01984.x
Khuntia HK, Pal BB, Chhotray GP (2008) Quadruplex PCR for simultaneous detection of serotype, biotype, toxigenic potential, and central regulating factor of Vibrio cholerae. J Clin Microbiol 46:2399–2401. doi:10.1128/JCM.00024-08
Lee JV, Bashford DJ, Donovan TJ, Furniss AL, West PA (1982) The incidence of Vibrio cholerae in water animals and birds in Kent, England. J Appl Bacteriol 52:281–291. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1982.tb04852.x
McIntyre RC, Tira T, Flood T, Blake PA (1979) Modes of transmission of cholera in a newly infected population on an atoll: implications for control measures. Lancet 313:311–314
MPEDA (2008) Annual Report 2007–2008, Marine Products Export Development Authority, Cochin
Nair GB, Takeda Y (1993) Vibrio cholerae in disguise—a disturbing entity. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 9:299–400
Nair GB, Oku Y, Takeda Y, Ghosh A, Ghosh RK, Chattopadhyay S, Pal SC, Kaper JB, Takeda T (1988) Toxin profiles of Vibrio cholerae non-O1 from environmental sources in Calcutta, India. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:3180–3182
Nair GB, Bhadra RK, Ramamurthy T, Ramesh A, Pal SC (1991) Vibrio cholerae and other Vibrios associated with paddy field cultured prawns. Food Microbiol 8:203–208
Noguerola I, Blanch AR (2008) Identification of Vibrio spp. with a set of dichotomous keys. J Appl Microbiol 105:175–185. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03730.x
Otta SK, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I (1999) Bacterial flora associated with shrimp culture ponds growing Penaeus monodon in India. J Aquacult Trop 14:309–318
Panicker G, Call DR, Krug MJ, Bej AK (2004a) Detection of pathogenic Vibrio spp. In Shellfish by using Multiplex PCR and DNA microarrays. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:7436–7444
Panicker G, Vickery MCL, Bej AK (2004b) Multiplex PCR detection of clinical and environmental strains of Vibrio vulnificus in shellfish. Can J Microbiol 50:911–922. doi:10.1139/w04-085
Raghavan RP (2003) Incidence of human pathogenic bacteria in shrimp feeds—a study from India. Naga-World Fish Center Quarterly 26:22–24
Raghu G, Madhu Babu C, Chakrabarti R (2008) Recovery of carotenoprotein from tropical shrimp head wastes. J Food Sci Technol 45:323–327
Ramamurthy T, Garg S, Sharma R, Bhattacharya SK, Nair GB, Shimada T, Takeda T, Karasawa T, Kurazano H, Pal A, Takeda Y (1993) Emergence of novel strain of Vibrio cholerae with epidemic potential in southern and eastern India. Lancet 341:703–704
Rao BM, Surendran PK (2010) Genetic heterogeneity of non-O1 and non-O139 Vibrio cholerae isolates from shrimp aquaculture system: a comparison of RS-, REP- and ERIC-PCR fingerprinting approaches. Lett Appl Microbiol 51:65–74. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02863.x
Rivera ING, Chun J, Huq A, Sack RB, Colwell RR (2001) Genotypes associated with virulence in environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2421–2429
Said B, Scotland SM, Rowe B (1994) The use of gene probes, immunoassays and tissue culture for the detection of toxin in Vibrio cholerae Non O1. J Med Microbiol 40:31–36. doi:10.1099/00222615-40-1-31
Salamaso S, Greco D, Bonfiglio B, Castellani-Pastoris M, de Felip G, Bracciotti A, Sitzia G, Congiu A, Piu G, Angioni G, Barra L, Zampieri A, Baine WB (1980) Recurrence of pelecypod-associated cholera in Sardinia. Lancet 316:1124–1128
Sambrook J, Russell WD (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, pp 5.1–5.14
Singh DV, Isac SR, Colwell RR (2002) Development of a hexaplex PCR assay for rapid detection of virulence and regulatory genes in Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio mimicus. J Clin Microbiol 40:4321–4324. doi:10.1128/JCM.40.11.4321-4324.2002
Tarr CL, Patel JS, Puhr ND, Sowers E, Bopp CA, Strockbine NA (2007) Identification of vibrio isolates using a multiplex PCR assay and rpoB sequence determination. J Clin Microbiol 45:134–140. doi:10.1128/JCM.01544-06
Vongxay K, He X, Cheng S, Zhou X, Shen B, Gi Z, Zhang J, Fang W (2006) Prevalence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafoods and their processing environments as detected by duplex PCR. J Sci Food Agric 86:1871–1877. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2545
Waldor MK, Mekalanos JJ (1994) Vibrio cholerae O139 specific gene sequences. Lancet 343:1366
Waldor MK, Mekalanos JJ (1996) Lysogenic conversion by a filamentous phage encoding Cholera toxin. Science 272:1910–1914
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Madhusudana, R.B., Surendran, P.K. Detection of ctx gene positive non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae in shrimp aquaculture environments. J Food Sci Technol 50, 496–504 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0374-4
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0374-4