Abstract
Coronary angioscopy (CAS) is a unique diagnostic device that allows direct visualization of the vascular luminal surface in living patients. CAS contributes to elucidate the pathology of coronary artery disease. This consensus document provides a standard for CAS examination and assessment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Coronary angioscopy (CAS) is a unique diagnostic device that allows direct visualization of the vascular luminal surface. It has a role of macropathologic examination in living patients. CAS provides a real-time full-color three-dimensional video image that cannot be presented by any other constructed imaging modalities such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), or optical coherence tomography (OCT). We can judge not only the shape and color of the target object but also its texture from its movement in the blood flow. CAS image gives us the inspiration of what is happening inside the vessel.
CAS has an extensive role in both research and clinical practice. Numerous novel findings have been reported on acute coronary syndrome (ACS), vulnerable plaques, and vascular response after coronary intervention with or without stent implantation by the experimental and clinical studies with CAS.
In this consensus document, we provide a standard for the examination and assessment by CAS.
Acquisition of angioscopic images
The most important thing for the acquisition of a clear angioscopic image is to clear away the blood from the viewing area. There are two types of angioscopy systems from this point: a balloon occlusion type and a non-occlusion type. A balloon occlusion type CAS is equipped with a compliant balloon to block antegrade blood flow, which makes a clear visual field with smaller amount of flushing fluid. However, since it causes myocardial ischemia, we should be careful not to induce ischemia-related complications. On the other hand, a non-occlusion type CAS can observe coronary lumen for a longer time period without causing myocardial ischemia. Nowadays, a balloon occlusion type CAS is not available for commercial reasons. We can observe coronary lumen continuously from distal are to the ostium of coronary vessels by pulling back the non-occlusion type CAS. Furthermore, we can also observe the same place for a long time to see the movement of the target object, by which we can detect the fracturing of thrombus or the protrusion of plaque debris from the ruptured plaque.
We should be careful about the focus and color correction (white balance) of CAS image and about keeping the lens of CAS catheter clean when we prepare the system and catheter. After insertion of CAS catheter with guide extension or probing catheter into the distal part of the target lesion, we start observation and acquisition of image by flushing low molecular weight dextran through guiding catheter and/or guide extension catheter/ probing catheter. We continue observation and acquisition of image while pulling back the CAS catheter with guide extension or probing catheter slowly and carefully.
Assessment of angioscopic images
Plaque color
Coronary plaques can be classified into yellow or white. White plaques are commonly observed as the culprit of stable coronary artery disease, whereas yellow plaques are often observed as the culprit of acute coronary syndrome [1]. The yellow plaques are reported to have thinner fibrous cap and larger lipid core than white plaques [2]. Yellow plaques are further classified into grade 0 (white), grade 1 (light yellow), grade 2 (yellow), and grade 3 (intensive yellow) (Fig. 1), and the higher color grade yellow plaques have the higher probability of having thrombus suggesting that the plaque has already been disrupted. There is a significant negative correlation between yellow color grade and fibrous cap thickness assessed by OCT, and grade-3 yellow plaques are regarded as thin-cap fibroatheroma with the cap thickness of less than 65 µm, i.e., vulnerable plaque [3, 4]. Furthermore, the accelerated formation of yellow plaque, i.e., neoatherosclerosis, has been reported after first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher stent) implantation [5], and the presence of in-stent yellow plaque (more than grade 2) at 1 year after implantation is a predictor of future stent failure [6]. Therefore, yellow plaque is the major cause of ACS and its detection is clinically very important. Although the lesion with superficial calcium deposition also appears yellow by CAS [7, 8], its cause and clinical implication remains controversial.
Plaque rupture
Plaque rupture is a major mechanism of ACS [9,10,11]. CAS can easily identify the ruptured plaque (Fig. 2) by detecting the protrusion of yellow intra-plaque material into lumen accompanied by thrombus, which often contains sparkling materials suggesting the presence of cholesterol crystals.
Plaque erosion
Plaque erosion is another mechanism of ACS [10, 12,13,14]. Eroded plaque by CAS is defined by the presence of thrombus without protrusion of yellow intra-plaque material (Fig. 2). Although it may possibly be a ruptured plaque with a very small rupture, we can usually judge if there is the protrusion of intra-plaque material into the lumen, i.e., plaque rupture, since CAS can provide a fine full-color three-dimensional video image of the vascular surface.
Thrombus
Thrombus is detected as a material adhering to the luminal surface or protruding into the lumen. Thrombus is classified into red, white, or mixed according to its color (Fig. 3). White thrombus is composed of platelets and fibrin, while red thrombus contains abundant erythrocytes in the fibrin network [15]. Reddish thrombi are often observed as the culprit of acute myocardial infarction where blood flow is significantly reduced, whereas white thrombi are often observed as the culprit of unstable angina or non-ST elevated myocardial infarction where blood flow is adequately preserved [10, 16].
Neointimal coverage after stent implantation
CAS is a useful tool to evaluate the time course of vascular response after coronary intervention. Novel findings such as delayed neointimal coverage and accelerated yellow plaque formation after drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation have been reported by many studies with angioscopy [5, 6, 17,18,19,20,21]. These findings would contribute to the development of new DES with better biocompatibility. Furthermore, early CAS findings on new DES would give us a caution on the bad later clinical outcomes as in the case of Cypher stent, in which a high incidence of very late stent thrombosis was suspected from the early CAS findings.
The degree of neointima coverage over the stent is usually classified into 4 grades: grade 0 (fully visible without coverage), grade 1 (stent with very thin neointima coverage), grade 2 (stent is completely embedded under neointima but seen translucently), and grade 3 (stent is invisible under neointima) (Fig. 4), although it is sometimes classified into 3 grades combining grade 2 and 3 as grade 2 [6, 20, 22]. Several studies demonstrated that the intra-stent thrombus adhesion is more frequently observed at the site of neointima coverage grade 0/1 than at the site of neointima coverage grade 2/3 [17,18,19, 23], suggesting that neointima coverage grade is correlated with the degree of re-endothelization. The neointima coverage grade is generally heterogeneous to some extent; therefore, the neointima coverage grade of a stent would be determined by the dominant grade or by the minimum and maximum grade in the stent. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the grade is presented by the heterogeneity index calculated by maximum–minimum grade [24,25,26].
A yellow plaque newly formed inside the stent is recognized as neoatherosclerosis [5, 27], which would be accelerated by poor re-endothelization and prolonged inflammatory reaction [28]. First-generation sirolimus-eluting Cypher stent is known to accelerate the formation of yellow plaque in the stented site [5]. Yellow plaque is more frequently observed after first-generation bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (ABSORB) implantation than after everolimus-eluting stent implantation [29]. The presence of yellow plaque after stent implantation is a predictor of future stent failure [6]; therefore, CAS should be a useful tool to detect high risk patients of future stent failure.
Observation of other vessels by angioscopy
If blood is cleared away from the viewing area , angioscopy can observe any vessel including aorta [30, 31], carotid artery [32], pulmonary artery [33, 34], and lower extremity peripheral artery [35, 36]. There would be a new world in those vessels to which we are blinded. Angioscopic observations of those vessels would give us much new inspiration to clarify the pathophysiology of various vascular diseases.
References
Mizuno K, Miyamoto A, Satomura K, Kurita A, Arai T, Sakurada M, Yanagida S, Nakamura H. Angioscopic coronary macromorphology in patients with acute coronary disorders. Lancet. 1991;337:809–12.
Isoda K, Satomura K, Ohsuzu F. Pathological characterization of yellow and white plaques under angioscopy. Int J Angiol. 2001;10:183–7.
Kubo T, Imanishi T, Takarada S, Kuroi A, Ueno S, Yamano T, Tanimoto T, Matsuo Y, Masho T, Kitabata H, Tanaka A, Nakamura N, Mizukoshi M, Tomobuchi Y, Akasaka T. Implication of plaque color classification for assessing plaque vulnerability: a coronary angioscopy and optical coherence tomography investigation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1:74–80.
Takano M, Jang IK, Inami S, Yamamoto M, Murakami D, Okamatsu K, Seimiya K, Ohba T, Mizuno K. In vivo comparison of optical coherence tomography and angioscopy for the evaluation of coronary plaque characteristics. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:471–6.
Higo T, Ueda Y, Oyabu J, Okada K, Nishio M, Hirata A, Kashiwase K, Ogasawara N, Hirotani S, Kodama K. Atherosclerotic and thrombogenic neointima formed over sirolimus drug-eluting stent: an angioscopic study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:616–24.
Ueda Y, Matsuo K, Nishimoto Y, Sugihara R, Hirata A, Nemoto T, Okada M, Murakami A, Kashiwase K, Kodama K. In-stent yellow plaque at 1 year after implantation is associated with future event of very late stent failure: the DESNOTE study (Detect the Event of Very late Stent Failure From the Drug-Eluting Stent Not Well Covered by Neointima Determined by Angioscopy). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:814–21.
Shibuya M, Ishihara M. Coronary angioscopy for the evaluation of vessel response after drug-eluting stent implantation. Circ J. 2016;80:590–1.
Shibuya M, Fujii K, Hao H, Imanaka T, Saita T, Kawakami R, Miki K, Tamaru H, Horimatsu T, Sumiyoshi A, Nishimura M, Hirota S, Masuyama T, Ishihara M. Atherosclerotic component of the yellow segment after drug-eluting stent implantation on coronary angioscopy: an ex-vivo validation study. Circ J. 2018;83:193–7.
Falk E. Plaque rupture with severe pre-existing stenosis precipitating coronary thrombosis. Characteristics of coronary atherosclerotic plaques underlying fatal occlusive thrombi. Br Heart J. 1983;50:127–34.
Mizuno K, Satomura K, Miyamoto A, Arakawa K, Shibuya T, Arai T, Kurita A, Nakamura H, Ambrose JA. Angioscopic evaluation of coronary-artery thrombi in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:287–91.
Muller JE, Abela GS, Nesto RW, Tofler GH. Triggers, acute risk factors and vulnerable plaques: the lexicon of a new frontier. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:809–13.
Farb A, Burke AP, Tang AL, Liang TY, Mannan P, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary plaque erosion without rupture into a lipid core. A frequent cause of coronary thrombosis in sudden coronary. Circulation. 1996;93:1354–63.
Mizukoshi M, Imanishi T, Tanaka A, Kubo T, Liu Y, Takarada S, Kitabata H, Tanimoto T, Komukai K, Ishibashi K, Akasaka T. Clinical classification and plaque morphology determined by optical coherence tomography in unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:323–8.
Ozaki Y, Okumura M, Ismail TF, Motoyama S, Naruse H, Hattori K, Kawai H, Sarai M, Takagi Y, Ishii J, Anno H, Virmani R, Serruys PW, Narula J. Coronary CT angiographic characteristics of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes not related to plaque rupture as defined by optical coherence tomography and angioscopy. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2814–23.
Mizuno K, Miyamoto A, Isojima K, Kurita A, Senoo A, Arai T, Kikuchi M, Nakamura H. A serial observation of coronary thrombi in vivo by a new percutaneous transluminal coronary angioscope. Angiology. 1992;43:91–9.
Uchida Y, Masuo M, Tomaru T, Kato A, Sugimoto T. Fiberoptic observation of thrombosis and thrombolysis in isolated human coronary arteries. Am Heart J. 1986;112:691–6.
Kotani J, Awata M, Nanto S, Uematsu M, Oshima F, Minamiguchi H, Mintz GS, Nagata S. Incomplete neointimal coverage of sirolimus-eluting stents: angioscopic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2108–11.
Awata M, Kotani J, Uematsu M, Morozumi T, Watanabe T, Onishi T, Iida O, Sera F, Nanto S, Hori M, Nagata S. Serial angioscopic evidence of incomplete neointimal coverage after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: comparison with bare-metal stents. Circulation. 2007;116:910–6.
Awata M, Nanto S, Uematsu M, Morozumi T, Watanabe T, Onishi T, Iida O, Sera F, Minamiguchi H, Kotani J, Nagata S. Heterogeneous arterial healing in patients following paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:453–8.
Takano M, Yamamoto M, Murakami D, Inami S, Okamatsu K, Seimiya K, Ohba T, Seino Y, Mizuno K. Lack of association between large angiographic late loss and low risk of in-stent thrombus: angioscopic comparison between paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1:20–7.
Takano M, Mizuno K. Angioscopic findings after drug-eluting stent implantation. Herz. 2007;32:281–6.
Sotomi Y, Suzuki S, Kobayashi T, Hamanaka Y, Nakatani S, Hirata A, Takeda Y, Ueda Y, Sakata Y, Higuchi Y. Impact of the one-year angioscopic findings on long-term clinical events in 504 patients treated with first-generation or second-generation drug-eluting stents: the DESNOTE-X study. EuroIntervention. 2019;15:631–9.
Mitsutake Y, Ueno T, Yokoyama S, Sasaki K, Sugi Y, Toyama Y, Koiwaya H, Ohtsuka M, Nakayoshi T, Itaya N, Chibana H, Kakuma T, Imaizumi T. Coronary endothelial dysfunction distal to stent of first-generation drug-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:966–73.
Hara M, Nishino M, Taniike M, Makino N, Kato H, Egami Y, Shutta R, Yamaguchi H, Tanouchi J, Yamada Y. Difference of neointimal formational pattern and incidence of thrombus formation among 3 kinds of stents: an angioscopic study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:215–20.
Nishimoto Y, Ueda Y, Sugihara R, Murakami A, Ueno K, Takeda Y, Hirata A, Kashiwase K, Higuchi Y, Yasumura Y. Comparison of angioscopic findings among second-generation drug-eluting stents. J Cardiol. 2017;70:297–302.
Nojima Y, Adachi H, Ihara M, Kurimoto T, Okayama K, Sakata Y, Nanto S. Impact of different coronary angioscopic findings on arterial healing one year after bioresorbable-polymer and second-generation durable-polymer drug-eluting stent implantation. J Cardiol. 2020;76:371–7.
Kawakami H, Matsuoka H, Oshita A, Kono T, Shigemi S. A case of a newly developed yellow neointima at stent implanted site 1 year after sirolimus-eluting stent placement: angioscopic findings. J Cardiol. 2009;54:153–7.
Nakazawa G, Otsuka F, Nakano M, Vorpahl M, Yazdani SK, Ladich E, Kolodgie FD, Finn AV, Virmani R. The pathology of neoatherosclerosis in human coronary implants bare-metal and drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1314–22.
Wan Ahmad WA, Nakayoshi T, Mahmood Zuhdi AS, Ismail MD, Zainal Abidin I, Ino Y, Kubo T, Akasaka T, Fukumoto Y, Ueno T. Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: Endothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary Technology). Heart Vessels. 2020;35:463–73.
Komatsu S, Ohara T, Takahashi S, Takewa M, Minamiguchi H, Imai A, Kobayashi Y, Iwa N, Yutani C, Hirayama A, Kodama K. Early detection of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque for risk reduction of acute aortic rupture and thromboemboli and atheroemboli using non-obstructive angioscopy. Circ J. 2015;79:742–50.
Kojima K, Kimura S, Hayasaka K, Mizusawa M, Misawa T, Yamakami Y, Sagawa Y, Ohtani H, Hishikari K, Sugiyama T, Hikita H, Takahashi A. Aortic plaque distribution, and association between aortic plaque and atherosclerotic risk factors: an aortic angioscopy study. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2019;26:997–1006.
Kondo H, Kiura Y, Sakamoto S, Okazaki T, Yamasaki F, Iida K, Tominaga A, Kurisu K. Comparative evaluation of angioscopy and intravascular ultrasound for assessing plaque protrusion during carotid artery stenting procedures. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:e448–55.
Uchida Y, Uchida Y, Shirai S, Oshima T, Shimizu K, Tomaru T, Sakurai T, Kanai M. Angioscopic detection of pulmonary thromboemboli: with special reference to comparison with angiography, intravascular ultrasonography, and computed tomography angiography. J Interv Cardiol. 2010;23:470–8.
Chibana H, Tahara N, Itaya N, Sasaki M, Sasaki M, Nakayoshi T, Ohtsuka M, Yokoyama S, Sasaki KI, Ueno T, Fukumoto Y. Optical frequency-domain imaging and pulmonary angioscopy in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1296–304.
Ishihara T, Iida O, Awata M, Nanto K, Shiraki T, Okamoto S, Iida T, Fujita M, Watanabe T, Nanto S, Uematsu M. Extensive arterial repair one year after paclitaxel-coated nitinol drug-eluting stent vs bare-metal stent implantation in the superficial femoral artery. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2015;30:51–6.
Tsukiyama Y, Shinke T, Ishihara T, Otake H, Terashita D, Kozuki A, Fukunaga M, Zen K, Horimatsu T, Fujii K, Shite J, Uematsu M, Takahara M, Iida O, Nanto S, Hirata KI. Vascular response to paclitaxel-eluting nitinol self-expanding stent in superficial femoral artery lesions: post-implantation angioscopic findings from the SHIMEJI trial (Suppression of vascular Wall Healing after Implantation of Drug Eluting Peripheral Stent in Japanese patients with the Infra inguinal lesion: serial angioscopic observation). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;35:1777–84.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitsutake, Y., Yano, H., Ishihara, T. et al. Consensus document on the standard of coronary angioscopy examination and assessment from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 37, 35–39 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-021-00770-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-021-00770-x