Abstract
The extent of genetic diversity and relatedness of cowpea germplasm from East Africa are poorly understood. A set of 13 microsatellites (SSR) and 151 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) markers were applied to assess the levels of genetic diversity in a sample of 95 accessions of local cowpea germplasm and inbred lines of Vigna unguiculata. The average genetic diversity (D), as quantified by the expected heterozygosity, was higher for SSR loci (0.52) than for SNPs (0.34). The polymorphic information content was 0.48 for SSR and 0.28 for SNP while the fixation index was 0.095 for SSR and 0.15 for SNPs showing moderate differentiation and high gene flow among cowpea accessions from East African countries. The results of data analysis of both SSR and SNP markers showed similar clustering patterns suggesting a substantial degree of association between origin and genotype. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) with SSR and SNP markers showed that accessions were grouped into two and three broad groups across the first two axes, respectively. Our study found that SNP markers were more effective than SSR in determining the genetic relationship among East African local cowpea accessions and IITA inbred lines. Based on this analysis, five local cowpea accessions Tvu-13490, Tvu-6378, Tvu-13448, Tvu-16073, and 2305675 were identified to be tightly clustered sharing several common alleles with the drought tolerant variety Danila when analyzed with SSR and SNP markers. The findings will assist and contribute to future genetic diversity studies aimed at the genetic improvement of local Eastern Africa cowpea accessions for improved overall agronomic performance in general and breeding for drought tolerant in particular.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abe J, Xu D, Suzuki Y, Kanazawa A, Shimamoto Y. 2003. Soybean germplasm pools in Asia revealed by nuclear SSRs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106: 445–453
Asare AT, Gowda BS, Galyuon IKA, Aboagye LL, Takrama JF, Timko MP. 2010. Assessment of the genetic diversity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] germplasm from Ghana using simple sequence repeat markers. Plant Genet. Res. Char. Util. 8: 142–150
Ba FS, Pasquet RE, Gepts P. 2004. Genetic diversity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] as revealed by RAPD markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 51: 539–550
Badiane FA, Diouf D, Sané D, Diouf O, Goudiaby V, Diallo N.. 2004. Screening cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] varieties by inducing water deficit and RAPD analyses. Afr J. Biotechnol. 3: 174–178
Badiane FA, Gowda BS, Cisse N, Diouf D, Sadio O, Timko MP. 2012. Genetic relationship of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) varieties from Senegal based on SSR markers. Genet. Mol. Res. 11(1): 292–304
Choumane W, Winter P, Weigand F, Kahl G. 2000. Conservation and variability of sequence tagged microsatellites sites (STMSs) from chickpea (Cicer aerietinum L.) within the genus Cicer. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 269–278
Craig, DW, Pearson JV, Szelinger S, Sekar A, Redman M, Corneveaux JJ, Laub T, Nunn G, Homer N., Huentelman MJ. 2008. Identification of genetic variants using bar-coded multiplexed sequencing. Nat. Methods 5: 887–893
De Vicente M, Lopez C, Fulton T. 2004. Genetic diversity analysis with molecular marker data: learning module. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), Cornell University
Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB. 1983. A plant minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1: 19–21
Delmer DP. 2005. Agriculture in the developing world: Connecting innovations in plant research to downstream applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 15739–15746
Delphine VI, Melchinger AE, Lebreton C, Stich B. 2010. Population structure and genetic diversity in a commercial maize breeding program assessed with SSR and SNP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120: 1289–1299
Desalegne B.A., Mohammed S., Dagne, K., Timko MP. 2016. Assessment of genetic diversity in Ethiopian cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] germplasm using simple sequence repeat markers. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 34: 978
Dikshit HK, Jhang T, Singh NK, Koundal KR, Bansal KC, Chandra N, Tickoo JL, Sharma TR. 2007. Genetic differentiation of Vigna species by RAPD, URP and SSR markers. Biol. Plant 51: 451–457
Diouf D, Hilu KW. 2005. Microsatellite and RAPD markers to study genetic relationships among cowpea breeding lines and local varieties in Senegal. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 52: 1957–1967
Duran C, Appleby N, Clark T, Wood D, Imelfort M, Batley J, Edwards D. 2009. AutoSNPdb: an annotated single nucleotide polymorphism database for crop plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 37: D951–953
Edwards D, Batley J. 2010. Plant genome sequencing: applications for plant improvement. Plant Biotech. J. 8: 2–9
Ehlers JD, Hall AE. 1996. Genotypic classification of cowpea based on responses to heat and photoperiod. Crop Sci. 36: 673–679
Ehlers JD, Hall AE. 1997. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Field Crops Res. 53: 187–204
Elshire, RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, Mitchell SE. 2011. A robust, simple genotypingby- sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 6: e19379
Fang J, Chao CCT, Roberts PA, Ehlers JD. 2007. Genetic diversity of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] in four West African and USA breeding programs as determined by AFLP analysis. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 54: 1197–1209
Fatokun CA, Danesh D, Young ND. 1993. Molecular taxonomic relationships in the genus Vigna based on the RFLP analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 97–104
Fatokun CA, Ogunkanmi A, Ogundipe OT, Ng NQ. 2008. Genetic diversity in wild relatives of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) as revealed by simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers. J. Food, Agric. Environ, Vol. 6 (3 & 4): 263–268
Fotso M, Azanza JL, Pasquet R, Raymond J. 1994. Molecular heterogeneity of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Fabaceae) seed storage proteins. Plant Syst. Evol. 191: 39–56
Ganal MW, Durstewitz G, Polley A, Bernard A, Buckler ES, Charcosset A, Clarke JD, Graner EM, Hansen M, Joets J, Le Paslier MC, McMullen MD, Montalent P, Rose M, Schön CC, Sun Q, Walter H, Martin OC, Falque M. 2011. A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasms genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome. PLoS ONE 6: e28, p 334
Gupta PK, Varshney RK. 2000. The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat. Euphytica 113: 163–185
He C, Poysa V, Yu K. 2003. Development and characterization of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and their use in determining relationships among Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106: 363–373
Hegde VS, Mishra SK. 2009. Landraces of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., as potential sources of genes for unique characters in breeding. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 56: 615–627
Jones ES, Sullivan H, Bhattramakki D, Smith JSC. 2007. A comparison of simple sequence repeat and single nucleotide polymorphism marker technologies for the genotypic analysis of maize (Zea mays L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 115: 361–371
Kennedy GC, Matsuzaki H, Dong S, Liu WM, Huang J, Liu G, Su X, Cao M, Chen W, Zhang J, Liu W, Yang G, Di X, Ryder T, He Z, Surti U, Phillips MS, Boyce-Jacino MT, Fodor SP, Jones KW. 2003. Large scale genotyping of complex DNA. Nat. Biotechnol. 21: 1233–1237
Khumallambam Devala Devi, Kshetrimayum Punyarani, Nandeibam Samarjit Singh, and Huidrom Sunitibala Devi. 2013. An efficient protocol for total DNA extraction from the members of order Zingiberales- suitable for diverse PCR based downstream applications. Springerplus, 2: 669
Kiambi DK, Newbury HJ, Ford-Llord B V, Dawson I. 2005. Contrasting genetic diversity among Oryza longistaminata (A.Chev et Roehr) proportions from different geographic origins using AFLP. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 4(4): 308–317
Kuruma RW, Kiplagat O, Ateka E, Owuoche G. 2008. Genetic diversity Kenya Cowpea accessions based on morphological and microsatellite markers. East Afr. Agric For. J. 76: 3–4
Langyintuo AS, Lowenberg-DeBoer J, Faye M, Lamber D, Ibro G. 2003. Cowpea supply and demand in West Africa. Field Crops Res. 82: 215–231
Li CD, Fatokun CA, Ubi B, Singh BB, Scoles GJ. 2001. Determining genetic similarities and relationships among cowpea breeding lines and cultivars by microsatellite primers. Crop Sci. 41: 189–197
Liu K, Muse S 2005. PowerMarker: Integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics 21(9): 2128–2129
Lucas MR, Diop NN, Wanamaker S, Ehlers JD, Roberts PA, Close TJ. 2011. Cowpea–Soybean Synteny Clarified through an Improved Genetic Map. Plant Genome 4: 218–225
Metzker ML. 2005. Emerging technologies in DNA sequencing. Genome Res. 15: 1767–1776
Morin PA, Luikart G, Wayne RK, the SNP workshop group. 2004. SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 208–216
Muchero W, Diop NN, Bhat PR, Fenton RD, Wanamaker S, Pottorff M, Hearne S, Cisse N, Fatokun C, Ehlers JD, Roberts PA, Close TJ. 2009. A consensus genetic map of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.] and synteny based on EST-derived SNPs. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 106: 18159–18164
Nkongolo KK. 2003. Genetic characterization of Malawian cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] landraces: diversity and gene flow among accessions. Euphytica 129: 219–228
O’Neill R, Snowdon RJ, Kohler W. 2003. Population genetics aspects of biodiversity. Progr. Bot. 64: 115–137
Ogunkanmi LA, Ogundipe OT, Fatokun, CA. 2014. Molecular characterization of cultivated Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) using Simple Sequence Repeats markers. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 13 (34): 3464–3472
Ogunkanmi LA, Ogundipe OT, Ng NQ, Fatokun CA. 2008. Genetic diversity in wild relatives of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) as revealed by simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers. J. Food Agric. Environ. 6: 253–268
Pasquet RS. 1993. Variation at isoenzyme loci in wild Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp (Fabaceae, Phaseoleae). Plant Syst. Evol. 186: 157–173
Pasquet RS. 1999. Genetic relationships among subspecies of Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp based on allozyme variation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 1104–1119
Pasquet RS. 2000. Allozyme diversity of cultivated cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 211–219
Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6: 288–295
Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F. 2003. Data analysis methods. In: P Hamon, M Seguin, X Perrier, JC Glaszmann, Ed., Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants. Enfield, Science Publishers, Montpellier, pp 43–76
Rafalski A. 2002. Applications of single nucleotide polymorphisms in crop genetics. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5: 94–100.
Ramos AM, Crooijmans RPMA, Affara NA, Amaral AJ, Archibald AL, Beever JE, Bendixen C, Churcher C, Clark R, Dehais P, Hansen MS, Hedegaard J, Hu ZL, Kerstens HH, Law AS, Megens HJ, Milan D, Nonneman DJ, Rohrer GA, Rothschild MF, Smith TPL, Schnabel RD, Tassell CPV, Taylor JF, Wiedmann RT, Schook LB, Groenen MAM. 2009. Design of a high-density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using SNPs identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology. PLoS ONE 4: e6524
Richie KO. 1985. Introduction. In: Cowpea: Research, Production and Utilization. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK
Sariah JE, Backes G, Nchimbi SM. 2010. Enhancing Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Production Through Insect Pest Resistant Lines in East Africa. PhD thesis. University of Copenhagen
Sawadogo M, Ouedraogo JT, Gowda BS, Timko MP. 2010. Genetic diversity of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] Cultivars in Burkina Faso resistance to Striga gesnerioides. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 9: 8146–8153
Schlotterer C. 2004. The evolution of molecular markers just a matter of fashion? Nat. Rev. Genet. 5: 63–69
Schuster SC. 2008. Next-generation sequencing transforms today’s biology. Nat. Methods 5: 16–18
Simon MV, Benko-Iseppon AM, Resende LV, Winter P, Kahl G. 2007. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in Vigna savi germplasm revealed by DNA amplification fingerprinting. Genome 50: 538–547
Singh BB, Chambliss OL, Sharma B. 1997. Recent advances in cowpea breeding. In: BB Singh, DR Mohan Raj, KE Dashiell, LEN Jackai, Eds. Advances in cowpea research, Co publication of International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeriaand Japan International Research Centre for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), Sayce Publishing, Devon, pp. 114–128
Singh BB. 2005. Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. In: RJ Singh, PP Jauhar, Eds., Genetic Resources, Chromosome Engineering and Crop Improvement. Volume 1, CRC Press, BocaRaton, FL, USA, pp. 117–162
Tan H, Tie M, Luo Q, Zhu Y, Lai J, Li H. 2012. A review of molecular markers applied in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) breeding. J. Life Sci. 6: 1190–1199
Timko MP, Ehlers JDm Roberts PA. 2007. Cowpea In: Pulses, Sugar and Tuber Crops, genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding in Plants (Kole C, ed.). 3. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 49–67
Timko MP, Singh BB. 2008. Cowpea, A Multifunctional Legume. In: Genomics of Tropical Crop Plants (Moore PH, Ming R, eds.). Springer Science+Business Media, New York, 227–258
Tosti N, Negri V. 2002. Efficiency of three PCR-based markers in assessing genetic variation among cowpea (Vigna unguiculata subsp. unguiculata) landraces. Genome 45: 268–275
Uma MS, Hittalamani S, Murthy BCK, Viswanatha KP. 2009. Microsatellite DNA marker aided diversity analysis in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Ind. J. Genet. Plant Breed. 69: 35–43
Vaillancourt RE, Weeden NF. 1992. Chloroplast DNA polymorphism suggests Nigerian center of domestication for the Cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (Leguminose). Amer. J. Bot. 79(10): 1194–1199
Vignal A, Milan D, SanCristobal M, Eggen A. 2002. A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics. Genet. Sel. Evol. 34: 275–305
Wang ML, Barkley NA, Gillaspie GA, Pederson GA. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships and genetic diversity of the USDA Vigna germplasm collection revealed by gene-derived markers and sequencing. Genet. Resour. 90: 467–480
Wright MH. 1978. Evolution and Genetics of population, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Wright S. 1984. Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol 3: experimental results and evolutionary deductions. The University of Chicago Press, London
Xavier GR, Martins LMV, Rumjanek NG, Filho FRF. 2005. Variabilidadegenéticaemacessos de caupianalisadapormeio demarcadores RAPD. Pesq. agropec. bras. 40: 353–359
Xu P, Wu X, Wang B, Liu Y Quin D, Ehlers JD, Close TJ, Hu T, Lu Z, Li G. 2010. Development and polymorphism of Vigna unguiculata ssp. unguiculata microsatellite markers used for phylogenetic analysis in asparagus bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. Sesquipedialis (L.) Verdc.) Mol. Breed. 25: 675–684
Zannou A, Kossou DK, Ahanchédé A, Zoundjihékpon J, Agbicodo E, Struik PC, Sanni A. 2008. Genetic variability of cultivated cowpea in Benin assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7: 4407–4414
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Desalegne, B.A., Dagne, K., Melaku, G. et al. Efficiency of SNP and SSR-based analysis of genetic diversity, population structure, and relationships among cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) germplasm from East Africa and IITA inbred lines. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 20, 107–128 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-016-0051-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-016-0051-0