Abstract
Species identification is crucial for carnivore conservation and ecological studies. We present a simple molecular genetic test that amplifies DNA of 16 wild carnivore species from three continents. The test is based on co-amplification of two mitochondrial DNA fragments and scoring of the resulting species-specific size patterns. We evaluated the performance of this method using 332 known tissue, blood, hair and fecal samples from 23 carnivore and 11 potential prey species. Results demonstrate that this test can distinguish many Caniform species but not members of Felidae. The test can be performed with a single PCR and capillary sequencer run for cost-effective processing of large sample numbers typical of non-invasive genetic projects.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Species identification (ID) is crucial in many wildlife conservation and management applications. Given the conservation interest and ecological relevance of the order Carnivora, several molecular species ID tests have been developed for this taxonomic group including sequencing of diagnostic DNA markers (Farrell et al. 2000; Chaves et al. 2012), mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)-RFLP (Paxinos et al. 1997; Mills et al. 2000), amplification with mtDNA species-specific primers (Palomares et al. 2002; Dalén et al. 2004; Fernandes et al. 2008), amplification of nuclear markers (Pilot et al. 2007; Oliveira et al. 2010), and real-time PCR (Berry and Sarre 2007; Matejusová et al. 2013). Recent approaches have moved toward more efficient methods to detect entire carnivore communities (Oliveira et al. 2010) and the use of standardized loci for the order (Chaves et al. 2012).
We report the development of a rapid, cost-effective molecular species ID test for 16 wild carnivores found in North America, South America and Europe. The method consists of co-amplification and fragment analysis of two short segments of the mtDNA control region using a single dye-labeled forward primer SIDL 5′-TCTATTTAAACTATTCCCTGG-3′ (Murphy et al. 2000), and two different reverse primers H16145 5′-GGGCACGCCATTAATCGACG-3′ (corrected sequence from Murphy et al. 2000) and H3R 5′-CCTGAAGTAGGAACCAGATG-3′ (Dalén et al. 2004).
We validated the method on 274 known hair (n = 60), fecal (n = 115), and blood/tissue samples (n = 99) of 21 wild carnivores from five families and the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) and cat (Felis catus) (Table 1). We analyzed 58 samples from 11 mammalian prey to evaluate the possibility of misidentification of carnivore fecal samples due to amplification of prey (Table 1) and tested human DNA to evaluate potential misidentification from human contamination. Samples were preserved in 95 % ethanol (tissue, feces), lysis buffer (blood, tissue), DETs buffer (feces), and silica desiccant (hair), and extracted using a Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (tissue, blood, hair) and QIAmp DNA stool kit (feces) (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). The 7 μl PCR contained 1× Qiagen Multiplex PCR Master Mix, 0.5× Qiagen Q Solution (Qiagen Inc.), 0.29 µM SIDL, 0.2 µM H16145, 0.1 µM H3R, 1 µl DNA extract. Thermocycling conditions included 15 min denaturation at 94 °C, 35 (hair, feces) or 30 (blood, tissue) cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 90 s at 46 °C, 60 s at 72 °C and 30 min elongation at 60 °C. DNA extraction and PCR set up for hair and feces were performed in a laboratory dedicated to low quantity DNA samples. Negative controls were used in each extraction and PCR to monitor contamination. PCR products were loaded on an ABI3130xl DNA sequencer and fragments scored with Genemapper 3.7 software (Applied Biosystems) using size bins for each species.
A PCR product was observed for 16 of the 22 wild predators plus the dog (Table 1). Primers SIDL and H16145 produced a 115–220 bp fragment (Fragment 1) in 13 predators, and primers SIDL and H3R produced a 315–401 bp fragment (Fragment 2) in 15 predators (Table 2). Ten species (American marten, fisher, black bear, Andean bear, river otter, gray fox, kit fox, swift fox, red fox, and Andean fox) exhibited a species-specific fragment size pattern (Table 2). Gray wolf (C. lupus), wolverine (Gulo gulo), and dog samples produced the same fragment or fragments (Table 2) and could not be distinguished. Also, coyotes (C. latrans) and red wolves (C. rufus), plus brown (Ursus arctos) and polar (U. maritimus) bears produced the same fragment size pattern respectively (Table 2). However, these primers will still be useful in areas where their ranges do not overlap. No amplification was observed for any felid species or for raccoons (Procyon lotor).
To further investigate these patterns, we performed in silico PCR using the program ecoPCR (Ficetola et al. 2010) and mammalian sequences from EMBL nucleotide library (release 117) and examined mismatches using PrimerBLAST (NCBI). These analyses revealed that ≥2 base pair mismatches within the last 4 bases on the 3′ end of a primer generally prevented PCR amplification. The horse was the only prey species that produced a PCR product in the predator species size range, but the 375 bp fragment did not overlap with predator fragments. Six other prey species also produced fragments, however, the size of the fragments was longer than observed for the predator species and unlikely to amplify in low quality samples (Table 2). Human DNA amplified at 573 base pairs.
This species ID method provides multiple benefits. First, 16 wild predator species of wide distribution and conservation interest can be identified with a single PCR and capillary sequencer run, allowing simple, rapid, and inexpensive processing of large sample numbers (ca. USD$1.5 in supplies after DNA extraction). This will be particularly useful for species identification of hair, feces, saliva or degraded tissue samples in areas where canids, ursids and mustelids are sympatric. Moreover, additional primers could be added to the multiplex and co-amplified for target species presently not detected (i.e. felids). Other benefits include the amplification of relatively short, high copy number mtDNA fragments favoring the analysis of degraded DNA, and the co-amplification of two markers producing distinct PCR products in most species.
References
Berry O, Sarre SD (2007) Gel-free species identification using melt-curve analysis. Mol Ecol Notes 7:1–4
Chaves PB, Graeff VG, Lion MB, Oliveira LR, Eizirik E (2012) DNA barcoding meets molecular scatology: short mtDNA sequences for standardized species assignment of carnivore noninvasive samples. Mol Ecol Resour 12:18–35
Dalén L, Götherström A, Angerbjörn A (2004) Identifying species from pieces of faeces. Conserv Genet 5:109–111
Farrell LE, Roman J, Sunquist ME (2000) Dietary separation of sympatric carnivores identified by molecular analysis of scats. Mol Ecol 9:1583–1590
Fernandes CA, Ginja C, Pereira I, Tenreiro R, Bruford MW, Santos-Reis M (2008) Species-specific mitochondrial DNA markers for identification of non-invasive samples from sympatric carnivores in the Iberian Peninsula. Conserv Genet 9:681–690
Ficetola G, Coissac E, Zundel S, Riaz T, Shehzad W, Bessiere J, Taberlet P, Pompanon F (2010) An in silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes. BMC Genomics 11:434
Matejusová I, Bland F, Hall AJ, Harris RN, Snow M, Douglas A, Middlemas SJ (2013) Real-time PCR assays for the identification of harbor and gray seal species and sex: a molecular tool for ecology and management. Mar Mamm Sci 29:186–194
Mills LS, Pilgrim KL, Schwartz MK, McKelvey K (2000) Identifying lynx and other North American felids based on MtDNA analysis. Conserv Genet 1:285–288
Murphy MA, Waits LP, Kendall KC (2000) Quantitative evaluation of fecal drying methods for brown bear DNA analysis. Wildl Soc Bull 28:951–957
Oliveira R, Castro D, Godinho R, Luikart G, Alves P (2010) Species identification using a small nuclear gene fragment: application to sympatric wild carnivores from South-western Europe. Conserv Genet 11:1023–1032
Palomares F, Godoy JA, Piriz A, O’Brien SJ, Johnson WE (2002) Faecal genetic analysis to determine the presence and distribution of elusive carnivores: design and feasibility for the Iberian lynx. Mol Ecol 11:2171–2182
Paxinos E, McIntosh C, Ralls K, Fleischer R (1997) A noninvasive method for distinguishing among canid species: amplification and enzyme restriction of DNA from dung. Mol Ecol 6:483–486
Pilot M, Gralak B, Goszczyński J, Posłuszny M (2007) A method of genetic identification of pine marten (Martes martes) and stone marten (Martes foina) and its application to faecal samples. J Zool 271:140–147
Acknowledgments
We thank agencies and individuals that provided samples and permits for this study: J. Aycrigg, M. Ben-David, U. Breitenmoser, J. Byers, R. Cisneros, A. Crupi, AK Dept. Fish and Game, ID Dept. Fish and Game, P. de Groot, R. Januszewski, D. Morin, Newfoundland Dept. Environment and Conservation, J. Pauli, Autonomous Trento Province, E. Randi, D. Schwalm, M. Schwartz, T. Steury, K. Woodruff, US Dept. Agriculture, US Fish and Wildlife Service, J. Vucetich and J. Young, Ministry of Environment of Ecuador.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Barba, M., Adams, J.R., Goldberg, C.S. et al. Molecular species identification for multiple carnivores. Conservation Genet Resour 6, 821–824 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-014-0257-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-014-0257-x