Abstract
Peptones are widely used as complex fermentation substrate for hyaluronic acid (HA) production; however, use of peptones in HA production reduces commercial competitiveness due to their high price. The present study was conducted to test the feasibility of sheep wool peptone (SWP) (mainly organic nitrogen source) and molasses (mainly carbon source) as cheap substrates for HA production from Streptococcus zooepidemicus ATCC 35246. Six peptones (SWP I–VI) were prepared from sheep wool using different chemical hydrolysis methods. Among them, SWP-VI was determined to be more fovarable for HA production. SWP-VI was compared with commercial tryptone peptone (TP) and protease peptone (PP) in order to evaluate its effectiveness in production of HA, lactic acid (LA) and cell biomass (CB). The protein contents of SWP-VI, TP and PP were determined as 70.6, 83.1 and 83.8 g/100 g, respectively. The best peptone for HA and CB production was SWP-VI, whereas PP was found to be more favourable for LA production. Maximum HA concentrations in SWP-VI, TP and PP media were determined as 3.54, 2.58 and 2.47 g/L, respectively.
Graphic Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Statement of Novelty
This is the first attempt on the evaluation of keratinous materials including sheep wool as organic nitrogen or peptone source for fermentative production of HA. The prepared sheep wool peptone can be also employed as substrate in future studies for the production of other industrially and/or biotechnologically important substances such as polysaccharides, organic acids, probiotics, recombinant proteins and single cell protein.
Introduction
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a high molecular mass polymer formed by repeating disaccharide units of Nacetyl-d-glucosamine and d-glucuronic linked by β(1–3) and β(1–4) glycosidic bonds [1]. HA is found in vertebrates (such as human and rooster) and in the capsules of some bacteria (e.g., strains of Streptococci), but is absent in fungi, plants, and insects [2]. In the human body, HA is widely present in the eyes, skin, cartilage, heart, inter-vertebral discs of the spine and in the fluids of the middle and inner ear [2, 3].
This polymer has some important physicochemical and biological properties in human body, such as lubricity, viscoelasticity, water holding capacity and biocompatibility [1]. Due to these potential properties, exogenous HA is extensively used in cosmetic and biomedical industries [2,3,4,5].
The first HA used for clinical purposes was extracted from the umbilical cords and rooster combs [6]. However, there are some concerns related with the use of rooster combs-based HA for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications [7]. For example, rooster combs-based HA products used for human therapeutics cause viral agent infections. On the other hand, the purification of HA from rooster combs is a difficult process [8]. Therefore, microbial fermentation has emerged as a new alternative approach for HA production.
The most preferred strain in fermentative production of HA is Streptococcus zooepidemicus [7]. However, it has been reported that the growth and HA production potential of S. zooepidemicus is highly depended on organic nitrogen as well as some vitamins and minerals. Especially with respect to organic nitrogen, the bacterium has fastidious nutrient requirements [1, 9,10,11]. Therefore, yeast extract and/or peptone are extensively added as organic nitrogen into the culture medium of S. zooepidemicus. For example, it is stated that this bacterium needs very high concentrations (up to 20 g/L) of peptone and/or yeast extract for HA production [12,13,14]. However, it is well known that high price of peptones and/or yeast extract decrease the commercial competitiveness of microbial fermentation in HA production. To solve the cost problem, some investigators have suggested using low-cost renewable resources and agro-industrial by-products as peptone or organic nitrogen source. For instance, Amado et al. [11, 15] demonstrated that cheese whey and corn steep liquor might be alternative organic nitrogen source for HA production from S. zooepidemicus. In other two studies [1], it was demonstrated that peptones or protein hydrolysates from fish wastes could be employed as cheap organic nitrogen sources for HA production from S. zooepidemicus. Apart from these two studies, there are no other studies in the literature on the development of alternative peptone source for HA production. Therefore, there is a need for new studies for the discovery of low cost peptones that may be an alternative to commercial peptones in fermentative HA production.
Keratin proteins are the major components of hair, feathers, wool and horns [16]. Sheep wool has an approximately protein content of 97% (82% keratin protein) and contains 20 different amino acids [17,18,19]. Recenty, it has been documented that protein hydrolyzates prepared from sheep wool by chemical and/or enzymatic methods can be used as plant fertilizer and animal feed [17, 20,21,22,23]. Taskin and co-workers [24] have also demonstrated that sheep wool protein hydrolyzate (peptone) can be also employed as a general growth substrate for some microorganisms (Bacillus subtilis, Esherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium chrysogenum and Saccharomyces cerevisia). However, their study was focused on investigating the only growth performance of these microorganisms on sheep wool peptone (SWP). To our best knowledge, there is no report on the use of SWP as substrate or organic nitrogen source for the fermentative production of valuable substances such as organic acids, polysaccharides, single cell protein, pigments, ethanol, enzymes, vitamins and antibiotics. In this regard, it is possible to say that SWP may a good alternative nitrogen source for HA production in the growth medium of S. zooepidemicus.
Molasses is a by-product that remains after the extraction of sugar from sugar beet or sugar cane. Sugar beet molasses contain 23–26% water, 47–48% sugar, 9–14% minerals and 8–12% nitrogenous compounds (aminoacids, proteins, etc.) [25, 26]. Due to rich nutritional composition, it is widely used as a fermentation substrate for production of industrially and/or biotechnologically valuable substances such as organic acid, single cell protein and biohydrogen [27,28,29]. Furthermore, molasses is reported to be used as substrate (mainly carbon source) in HA production by S. zooepidemicus [11, 30, 31]. However, molasses and sheep wool were not used together as substrate in HA production. Their usage as substrate in microbial media reduces the cost of production process. Moreover, use of molasses in microbial fermantations can make a significant contribution to the reduction of the environmental pollution problem. Because, it is well known that molasses can cause some detrimental effects on the ecosystem. For instance, when molasses is discharged to soil, it prevents seed germination and reduces soil alkalinity. It limits photosynthesis by preventing sunlight from entering the lower layers in aquatic systems [32, 33].
Considering the drawbacks mentioned above, the present work was performed to (1) prepare peptone from sheep wool and (2) produce HA from S. zooepidemicus using wool peptone and molasses as cheap fermentation substrates.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of Different Wool Peptones
Preparation of peptones from sheep wool was performed with some modifications according to previous studies [24, 34]. Firstly, sheep wool was washed with deionized water and then dried to constant weight in an oven at 100 °C. Dried wool (100 g) was hydrolyzed in 150 mL of acidic or alkaline solution inside a heat-resistant bottle. When wool hydrolyis was perfomed using 6 N solution of HCl, H2SO4 or H3PO4, the neutralization of the prepared hydrolysate was performed using the alkaline solution which contained 10 N KOH and 10 N Mg(OH)2. When wool was hydrolyzed using 2.5 N KOH, NaOH or Mg(OH)2, the prepared hydrolysate was neutralized using 6 N H3PO4.
After the acidic or alkaline hydrolysates were prepared as described above, they were subjected to neutralization, filtration, evaporation and drying processes, respectively. In this way, the production of different sheep wool peptones (SWPs) was aimed. The production scheme of SWPs was summarized in Supplementary Material Fig. S1.
Determination of Chemical Composition of Molasses, Different Wool Peptones and Commercial Peptones
Total nitrogen content of molasses, SWPs and commercial peptones was determined using a micro-Kjeldahl apparatus (Labconco Corporation, Kansas City, MO, USA), and crude protein content was estimated by multiplying the nitrogen contents by 6.25. Ash contents were determined by combusting a dry sample for 3 h in a muffle furnace (Thermolyne 62700, Barnstead/Thermolyne Corp., Dubuque, IA, USA) at 550 °C. Their elemental compositions were determined by using an Inductively Couple Plasma spectrophotometer (ICP-MS) (Agilent 7800). Total sugar contents were determined according to phenol–sulphuric acid method [35]. Amino-acids analyses of commercial peptones and the best SWP were carried out using LC–MS (Agilent 6460 Triple Quadrapole). Their total lipid contents were determined according to the Soxhlet extraction method using diethyl ether as solvent.
Preparation of Pre-culture
The strain Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus ATCC 35246 was selected for the present experiments. The pre-culture of the bacterium was prepared in a 250-mL flask containing 100 mL of standard trypticase soy broth (TSB) medium. To do this, the medium inside flask was sterilized and then inoculated with a loopfol of cell biomass of the bacterium growing on trypticase soy agar (TSA) medium. Afterwards, the inoculated flask was incubated at 200 rpm on a shaking incubator at 37 °C. After an incubation period of 24 h, 1 mL of the prepared pre-culture (about 2.0 absorbance at 600 nm) was employed for the inoculation of hyaluronic acid (HA) production medium.
Hyaluronic Acid Production in Shaking Flask Culture
Preliminary experiments for HA production were focused on determining the optimal molasses concentration. In this stage, the experiments were carried out in the liquid medium containing only molasses (at the different concentration from 6% to 20) and no other additives such as nitrogen and minerals.
After the optimal molasses concentration was determined, the following experiments were performed to determine the best SWP for HA production. In this stage, the production medium contained molasses (at the optimal concentration) and any of different SWPs (at the concentration of 4 g/L). After the most favorable SWP for HA production was determined, it was compared with two commercial peptones (TP, tryptone peptone and PP, protease peptone) at the different concentrations from 4 to 20 g/L.
All the experiments for HA prdoduction were performed inside 250-mL flasks containing 100 of the production medium (pH 8.0). For this purpose, the flaks were covered with cotton plugs, sterilized in autloclave and cooloed at the room temperature. After inoculating with one mL of pre-culture, the flasks were incubated at 200 rpm on a shaking incubator at 37 °C.
Analysis of Fermentation Parameters
A sample (10 mL) taken from culture broth was mixed with 10 mL of 0.1% SDS. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min to remove capsular HA from cells. Afterwards, the mixture was centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min to precipitate cells. The obtained pellets were washed and then dried at the constant weight at 100 °C in order to determine cell biomass (CB). The supernatant was employed for estimating HA, lactic acid (LA), residual sugar (RS) and pH. LA was determined using HPLC (Shimadzu Prominence LC-20A). Residual sugar was determined according to phenol–sulphuric acid method [35] using sucrose as standard.
For the partial purification of HA, 5 mL of supernatant was firstly mixed with 15 mL ethanol and the mixture was then incubated for 24 h at 4 °C. At the end of incubation period, the precipitate was collected by centrifugation (3000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C). Then, 25 mL of ethanol-saline water solution (75% ethanol, 25% 0.15 M NaCl, w/v) was added onto the precipitate in the centrifuge tube. Afterwards, the tube was re-centrifuged (3000 rpm, 4 °C, 20 min) and the final precipitate was dissolved into 30 mL of 0.15 M NaCl solution [36, 37]. This solution was used for estimating HA concentration. HA assay was performed with some modifications according to previous reports [38, 39]. For this, 1 mL of 0.15 M NaCl-HA solution was introduced into glass tubes filled with 5 mL of 25 mM Na2B4O7 in H2SO4. Each tube containing this reaction mixture was incubated for 15 min at 95 °C and then cooled in ice for 2 min. Afterwards, 0.2 mL of 0.125% (w/v) carbazole in absolute ethanol were added into this mixture, and each tube was re-incubated for 15 min at 95 °C and then cooled in ice for 2 min. The absorbance of the mixture was read at 550 nm using a spectrophotometer. Standard graphic was prepared using commercial HA. During the assay, the mixture containing 1 mL of 0.15 M NaCl solution was used as the blank.
Statistical Analysis
The elemental and amino-acids analysis of peptones were done in two technical replicates, and average values were given. The other analyzes (HA, CB, RS, LA, RS and pH) were performed in triplicate and the results were given as the mean of the three values ± standard deviation (SD). Whether the obtained data is statistically significant or not has been determined in the SPSS 15.0 package program using P < 0.05 significance level one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's Multiple Comparison Test.
Results and Discussion
Preparation of Sheep Wool Peptone
Peptones or protein hydrolysates are prepared from organic materials using chemicals and/or enzymes. Especially strong acids (H2SO4 and HCl) or alkalines (NaOH and KOH) are mostly preferred for hydrolysis of keratinous materials such as feather and wool. The prepared hydrolysates are then neutralized using acids or bases [17, 24, 34, 40]. Therefore, three strong acids (H2SO4, H3PO4 and HCl) or three bases (NaOH, KOH and Mg(OH)2) were tested for hydrolysis of sheep wool in this work. The obtained hydrolysates were neutralized using acidic or alkaline solution. In this way, production of six different sheep wool peptones (SWPs) was achieved. They were listed below.
-
Sheep wool peptone I (SWP-I) 6 N H2SO4 was used for hydrolysis, the obtained hydrolysate was then neutralized using the alkaline mixture containing 10 KOH and 10 N Mg(OH)2.
-
Sheep wool peptone II (SWP-II) 6 N HCl was used for hydrolysis, the obtained hydrolysate was then neutralized using the alkaline mixture containing 10 KOH and 10 N Mg(OH)2.
-
Sheep wool peptone III (SWP-III) 6 N H3PO4 was used for hydrolysis, the obtained hydrolysate was then neutralized using the alkaline mixture containing 10 KOH and 10 N Mg(OH)2.
-
Sheep wool peptone IV (SWP-IV) 2.5 N Mg(OH)2 was used for hydrolysis, the obtained hydrolysate was then neutralized using 6 N H3PO4.
-
Sheep wool peptone V (SWP-V) 2.5 N NaOH was used for hydrolysis, the obtained hydrolysate was then neutralized using 6 N H3PO4.
-
Sheep wool peptone VI (SWP-VI) 2.5 N KOH was used for hydrolysis, the obtained hydrolysate was then neutralized using 6 N H3PO4.
The previous studies demonstrated that three elements (K, P and Mg) significantly augment HA synthesis in S. zooepidemicus strains [9, 14, 41]. Hence, in the present study, the acids and/or bases incorporating these elements into the peptones were selected for hydrolysis and/or neutralization steps. For instance, the neutralization of the hydrolysate prepared using H2SO4 was performed using KOH and Mg(OH)2 in order to increase K and Mg contents (SWP-I). Similarly, it was aimed that SWP-III became richer in terms of K, Mg and P by selecting suitable hydrolyzing or neutralizing agents such as H3PO4, KOH and Mg(OH)2. Taking into account of the chemicals selected for hydrolysis and neutralization steps, it was considered that SWP-III would be more suitable for HA production since it contained all of K, P and Mg elements. But, the experiments demonstrated that only 10 g of 25 g wool could be hydrolyzed using H3PO4. Namely, the hydrolysis yield obtained with H3PO4 was too low. Similarly, too low hydrolysis yield (only 5.3 g of 25 g wool) was achieved when wool was subjected to Mg(OH)2 hydrolysis (SWP-IV). Therefore, it was considered that the processes designed for production of SWP-III and SWP-IV were not suitable. Conversely, favorable hydrolysis yields were obtained using HCl, H2SO4, NaOH or KOH. About 82.2 g of 100 g wool was hydrolyzed using H2SO4 (SWP-I). When HCl was used, 94.2 g of 100 g wool was hydrolyzed (SWP-II). NaOH could hydrolyze about 90 g of 100 g wool (SWP-V). When KOH was selected, 93.2 g of 100 g wool could be hydrolyzed (SWP-VI).
Based on these results, the hydrolysates which were prepared with HCl, H2SO4, NaOH or KOH hydrolysis were considered to be suitable for preparing peptone. Therefore, these hydrolysates were then subjected to neutralization, filtration and drying processes, respectively. At the end of these steps, 129.4 g SWP-I, 142.4 g SWP-II, 116.1 g SWP-IV and 118.2 g SWP-VI could be prepared (Supplementary Material Table S1). These results demonstrated that the most produced peptone was SWP-II among four peptones. This situation could be ascribed to the use of much more acids and bases for production of SWP-II. This assumption was also supported when the chemical analysis of peptones were performed. Namely, the highest ash content (37.1 g/100 g) was determined for SWP-II. The protein contents of peptones increased as the ash contents decreased. Therefore, the highest protein content (70.6 g/100 g) was recorded for SWP-VI having the lowest ash content (24.1 g/100 g). The protein contents of SWP-I, SWP-II and SWP-IV were determined as 65.4, 57.4 and 67.5 g/100 g, respectively (Supplementary Material Tables S1 and S2).
Hyaluronic Acid Production in Molasses Medium
Preliminary studies on HA production were performed in the medium containing only molasses. The total sugar, protein and ash contents of molasses were determined as 47.4, 10.0 and 8.2 g/L, respectively.
When the molasess alone was used in the medium, the maximum production of HA (1.08 g/L) and cell biomass (CB) (2.87 g/L) could be achieved at 14% molasses concentration. At this molasses concentration, the sugar content of the production medium was calculated as 66.3 g/L. Higher concentrations of molasses gave rise to the reductions in HA and CB concentrations (Fig. 1). This inhibitory effect could be attributed to the presence of some phenolics compouns and excessive metal ions inside molasses. This is because some phenolic compounds inside molasses have been reported to show antibacterial effect against some Streptococci species [42]. In another study [31], it was demonstrated that when molasses was detoxified using activated carbon, about %19 increase in HA and CB production was achieved. On the other hand, it is well known that sucrose accounts for about 90% of total sugar content of molasses. Considering this knowledge, total sugar and sucrose contents of 16% molasses was calculated as 75.7 and 68.2 g/L, respectively. The previous studies have shown that sucrose concentrations above 60 g/L limit the growth and HA production potential of S. zooepidemicus [11, 30, 43, 44]. So it was concluded that high sucrose content in molasses of 16% was another reason of the inhibitory effect on HA and CB. Based on these results, the subsequent experiments were performed at the optimal molasses concentration of 14%.
Selection of the Best Sheep Wool Peptone for HA Production
In the second stage of HA production, the molasses medium was supplemented with any of four different SWPs (SWP-I, SWP-II, SWP-IV and SWP-VI) at the same concentration (4 g/L). The experiments revealed that the peptones (SWP-I and SWP-II) prepared with acid hydrolysis showed poor solubility in the medium (initial pH of media was pH 8.0). Namely, a large amount of peptone-derived solid precipitate occurred in the medium and the precipitate became insoluble during the incubation period. Conversely, the peptones (SWP-IV and SWP-VI) prepared using alkaline hydrolysis were found to be completely dissolved in the medium (Supplementary Material Table S1).
As seen from Fig. 2, the addition of SWPs to the medium exerted more positive effect on HA synthesis rather than cell growth. The maximum HA production (2.36 g/L) was achieved in the medium supplemented with SWP-VI. The second highest HA concentration (2.11 g/L) could be reached in SWP-IV medium. These results were probably due to higher solubility and/or richer protein contents of SWP-IV and SWP-VI. The other possible reason was high P content of SWP-IV and SWP-VI, since H3PO4 (P source) was used as neutralizing agent for their preparation. Taking into account of these results, SWP-VI was selected as the best sheep wool peptone for the following experiments.
Comparison of Chemical Compositions of SWP-VI and Commercial Peptones
Chemical analyses demosnstrated that protein content (70.6 g/100 g) of SWP-VI was lower than TP (83.1 g/100 g) and PP (83.3 g/100 g). Contrary, the highest ash content (24.1 g/100 g) was determined for SWP-VI (Supplementary Material Table S2). Low protein and high ash contents of SWP-VI could be ascribed to the excessive use of chemicals during preparation of SWP-VI. Namely, acids and bases which were used in hydrolysis and neutralization steps lowered the protein content by increasing ash content, as noted in the previous studies [34, 45].
The elemantal analysis demosntrated that Na content of SWP-VI was lower than those of other peptones, whereas K, P, Mg, Fe and Ca contents of SWP-VI were higher than those of TP and PP (Supplementary Material Table S3). K and P contents of SWP-VI were 14,224 and 6014 mg/100 g, respectively. High P and K contents in SWP-VI were mainly associated with use of H3PO4 and KOH. Although Mg(OH)2 was not used in the preparation of SWP-VI, a high amount of Mg in SWP-VI was determined. This result was ascribed to the chemical composition of sheep wool. On the other hand, amino-acids analyzes demonstrated that when compared to the commercial peptones, SWP-VI had higher contents of six amino-acids (arginine, tyrosine, threonine, proline, serine and cystine) (Supplementary Material Table S4).
Determination of the Optimum Concentration of SWP-VI and Commercial Peptones for HA Production
In this stage of the study, the effectivenes of SWP-VI on HA production was compared with that of two commercial peptones (Tryptone peptone, TP and Protease peptone, PP). For this purpose, optimal concentrations of SWP-VI, TP and PP were firstly investigated. As can be seen from the results presented in Fig. 3, the optimal concentration of SWP-VI for HA production (3.54 g/L) was 12 g/L, whereas the optimal concentration of both TP and PP for HA production (respectively 2.58 and 2.47 g/L) was determined as 8 g/L. This difference in optimal concentration was probably due to the protein contents of peptones. Namely, because protein content of SWP-VI is lower, it was required to add more SWP-VI to the medium.
On the other hand, peptones concentrations above optimal sharply decreased HA production. These results could be ascribed to the the carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio of the medium, since it is widely reported that C/N ratio significantl affect HA synthesis in S. zoopedimicus strains [46, 47]. As in HA synthesis, cell growth was also positively affected by peptone addition. However, this positive effect on cell growth was more restricted. For example, addition of 12 g/L SWP-VI caused to about 227% increase in HA production but only 45% increase in CB production, when compared to the control medium.
Time Profile of Sugar Consumption, pH Change, Cel Growth, Hyaluronic Acid Synthesis and Lactic Acid Synthesis in Different Peptones Media
As seen from Fig. 4, the highest increases in the production of CB, HA and LA in the control medium (only %14 molasses) occurred between 24–36 h and their maximum concentrations were reached after 60 h. At the end of 60-h optimal incubation period, the maximum concentrations of HA, CB and LA were determined as 1.14, 3.14 and 14.9 g/L, respectively. Similarly, although sugar consumption and pH drop in the control medium continued until 60th h, both of them were faster between 24–36 h. At the end of 60th h, the concentration of residual sugar (RS) was 14.7 g/L and the final pH was 5.8. After 60th h, CB concentration decreased but HA, LA and RS concentrations as well as culture pH did not change. The decrease in CB concentration could be attributed the death of bacterial cells due to the deficiency of nitrogen source in the molasses.
In SWP-VI (Fig. 5), TP (Fig. 6) and PP (Fig. 7) media, the highest increases in HA, HB and LA concentration and as well as sugar consumption was detected between 12–24 h and their concentrations reached the maximum at the end of 48th h. In the peptone media, sugar consumption was faster between 12–24 h of fermentation and continued up to 48th h. In SWP-VI, TP and PP media after 48 h, HA concentrations were 3.54, 2.58 and 2.47 g/L, CB concentrations were 4.18, 3.47 and 3.31 g/L, LA concentrations were 29.8, 32.6 and 35.6 g/L and RS concentrations were 2.3, 4.1 and 3.6 g/L, respectively. The fastest pH drops in SWP-VI, TP and PP media were observed between 12–24 h and the lowest pHs were assayed as respectively 6.8, 5.6 and 5.4 at the end of 48th h. In SWP-VI, TP and PP media, HA, CB, LA and RS concentrations as well as culture pH became stable between 48 and 60 h. After 60th h, HA, CB and LA concentrations decreased in all the peptone media. This decrease might be due to the deficiency of sugar in the media (RS concentrations were only 2.3, 4.1 and 3.6 g/L in SWP-VI, TP and PP media, respectively). Namely, sugar deficiency may have directed the bacterium to use HA as a carbon source. This hypothesis can be supported by the fact that the hyaluronidases synthesized by some Streptococcus strains under carbon-limited conditions are able to degrade HA [48,49,50]. Similarly, the bacterium may have reduced LA content in the medium by using LA as an alternative carbon source due to the low sugar content in the medium. In contrast to the decreases in HA, HB and LA, the culture pH in all the peptone media showed a small increase again after 60th h. This situation could be attributed to the degradation of HA in the medium. The similar result was also reported in a previously published study [51].
Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 demonstrate that molasses alone could support HA synthesis and cell growth in the bacterium. This result can be explained by the fact that molasses contains some minerals, nitrogenous compounds and B vitamins as well as high sugar content [25, 26, 52]. On the other hand, it was seen that the addition of SWPs and commercial peptones augmented HA and LA synthesis as well as cell growth when compared to the control medium. Furthermore, it was determined that LA and HA synthesis as well as cell growth was faster in the peptone media when compared to the control medium. The positive effect of peptones could be atributed to their chemical compositions, especially their rich protein contents.
The experiments also demosntrated that effect of each peptone on HA and LA synthesis as well as cell growth was different. The best peptone for both HA synthesis and cell growth in S. zooepidemicus was determined as SWP-VI followed by TP (Figs. 5, 6, 7). Despite of low protein content of SWP-VI, better HA production in SWP-VI medium was probably due to higher K, P and Mg contents of SWP-VI compared to the commercial peptones (Supplementary Material Table S3). Because, researchers have shown that P, K and Mg are the most important elements that promote HA production [9, 14, 41].
The previous studies have revealed that three most important amino acids for HA synthesis are cystine, lysine and arginine. Especially, arginine has been reported to be main amino-acid that affects HA synthesis in S. zooepidemicus [9, 13]. Therefore, it was considered that high cystine and arginine contents of SWP-VI (Supplementary Material Table S4) were the second possible reason of higher HA productivity.
It has been also reported that HA synthesis can be inhibited by excessive LA production and low culture pH. Namely, the acidity in medium directs the carbon source to LA synthesis in S. zooepidemicus but the alkalinity does to HA synthesis [53]. Therefore, we assumed that the third reason of higher HA productivity in SWP-VI medium associated with less pH change and/or lower LA synthesis (initial pH and final pH were 8.0 and 6.8 after 48 h, respectively).
Conclusion
Cheap substrate selection in fermentative production of hyaluronic acid (HA) is considered an important criterion. In this context, the present study showed that molasses and sheep wool peptone (SWP-VI) could be used together as cheap complex substrates for fermentative HA production from S. zooepidemicus. SWP-VI was found to be more favorable for HA production compared to commercial peptones. Therefore, it can be preferred as a complex substrate (mainly organic nitrogen source) for industrial scale production of HA. The positive effect of SWP-VI on HA production could be attributed to its mineral and/or amino-acid composition. The cost of SWP-VI is lower than the commercial peptones since it can be prepared from sheep wool using cheap chemicals. On the other hand, use of molasses and wool as substrate in HA production may contribute to reducing the environmental pollution problem.
References
Vázquez, J.A., Pastrana, L., Piñeiro, C., Teixeira, J.A., Pérez-Martín, R., Amado, I.R.: Production of hyaluronic acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus on protein substrates obtained from Scyliorhinus canicula discards. Mar. Drugs 13, 6537–6549 (2015)
Kogan, G., Soltes, L., Stern, R., Gemeiner, P.: Hyaluronic acid: a natural biopolymer with a broad range of biomedical and industrial applications. Biotechnol. Lett. 29, 17–25 (2007)
Manasa, M., Sridevi, V., Chandana Lakshmi, M.V., Dedeepya, J.: A review on hyaluronic acid. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. 2, 6–11 (2012)
Chong, B.F., Blank, L.M., Mclaughlin, R., Nielsen, L.K.: Microbial hyaluronic acid production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 66, 341–351 (2005)
Averbeck, M., Gebhardt, C.A., Voigt, S., et al.: Differential regulation of hyaluronan metabolism in the epidermal and dermal compartments of human skin by UVB irradiation. J. Invest. Derm. 127, 687–697 (2007)
Balazs, E.A., Sweeney, D.B.: The injection of hyaluronic acid and reconstituted vitreous into the vitreous cavity. In: McPherson, A. (ed.) New and Controversial Aspects of Retinal Detachment, pp. 371–376. Harper and Row, New York (1968)
Liu, L., Liu, Y., Li, J., Du, G., Chen, J.: Microbial production of hyaluronic acid: current state, challenges, and perspectives. Microb. Cell Fact. 10, 99 (2011)
Chien, L.J., Lee, C.K.: Hyaluronic acid production by recombinant Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77, 339–342 (2007)
Armstrong, D.C., Cooney, M.J., Johns, M.R.: Growth and amino-acids requirements of hyaluronic-acid-producing Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 47, 309–312 (1997)
Kim, S.J., Park, S.Y., Kin, C.W.: A novel approach to the production of hyaluronic acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16, 1849–1855 (2006)
Amado, I.R., Vázquez, J.A., Pastrana, L., Teixeira, J.A.: Microbial production of hyaluronic acid from agro-industrial by-products: molasses and corn steep liquor. Biochem. Eng. J. 117, 181–187 (2017)
Duan, X.J., Yang, L., Zhang, X., Tan, W.S.: Effect of oxygen and shear stress on molecular weight of hyaluronic acid produced by Streptococcus zooepidemicus. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18, 718–724 (2008)
Liu, L., Du, G., Chen, J., Zhu, Y., Wang, M., Sun, J.: Microbial production of low molecular weight hyaluronic acid by adding hydrogen peroxide and ascorbate in batch culture of Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 362–367 (2009)
Patil, K.P., Chaudhari, B.L., Chincholkar, S.B.: Screening for pharmaceutically important exopolysaccharide producing Streptococci and partial optimization for EPS production. Curr. Trends Biotechnol. Pharm. 3, 329–340 (2009)
Amado, I.R., Vázquez, J.A., Pastrana, L., Teixeira, J.A.: Cheese whey: a cost-effective alternative for hyaluronic acid production by Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Food Chem. 198, 54–61 (2016)
Wang, K., Li, R., Ma, J.H., Jian, Y.K., Che, J.N.: Extracting keratin from wool by using L-cysteine. Green Chem. 18, 476–481 (2016)
Mokrejs, P., Krejci, O., Svoboda, P.: Producing keratin hydrolysates from sheep wool. Orient. J. Chem. 27, 1303–1309 (2011)
Zhang, H., Deb-Choudhury, S., Plowman, J., Dyer, J.: The Effect of wool surface and interior modification on subsequent photostability. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 127(5), 3435–3440 (2013)
Lewis, D.M., Rippon, J.A.: The Coloration of Wool and Other Keratin Fibres. Wiley, New York (2013)
Gousterova, A., Nustorova, M., Goshev, I., Christov, P., Braikova, D., Tishinov, K., Haertle, T., Nedkov, P.: Alkaline hydrolysate of waste sheep wool aimed as fertilizer. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 17, 140–145 (2003)
Gousterova, A., Braikova, D., Goshev, I., Christov, P., Tishinov, K., Vasileva-Tonkova, E., Haertle, T., Nedkov, P.: Degradation of keratin and collagen containing wastes by newly isolated thermoactinomycetes or by alkaline hydrolysis. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 40, 335–340 (2005)
Nustorova, M., Braikova, D., Gousterova, A., Vasileva-Tonkova, E., Nedkov, P.: Chemical, microbiological and plant analysis of soil fertilized with alkaline hydrolysate of sheep’s wool waste. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 22, 383–390 (2006)
Eslahi, N., Dadashian, F., Nejad, N.H.: Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of wool fibers for nanoparticles production using response surface methodology. Adv. Powder Technol. 24, 416–426 (2013)
Taskin, M., Unver, Y., Firat, A., Ortucu, S., Yildiz, M.: Sheep wool protein hydrolysate: a new peptone source for microorganisms. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 91, 1675–1680 (2016)
Kalogiannis, S., Iakovidou, G., Liakopoulou-Kyriakides, M., Kyriakidis, D.A., Skaracis, G.N.: Optimization of xanthan gum production by Xanthomonas campestris grown in molasses. Process Biochem. 39, 249–256 (2003)
Survase, S.A., Saudagar, P.S., Singhal, R.S.: Use of complex media for the production of scleroglucan by Sclerotium rolfsii MTCC 2156. Bioresour. Technol. 98, 1509–1512 (2007)
Akhtar, T., Hashmi, A.S., Tayyab, M., Anjum, A.A., Saeed, S., Ali, S.: Bioconversion of agricultural waste to butyric acid through solid state fermentation by Clostridium tyrobutyricum. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 1–7 (2018)
Kurcz, A., Błażejak, S., Kot, A.M., Bzducha-Wróbel, A., Kieliszek, M.: Application of industrial wastes for the production of microbial single-cell protein by fodder yeast Candida utilis. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 9, 57–64 (2018)
Lazaro, C.Z., Bosio, M., dos Santos Ferreira, J., Varesche, M.B.A., Silva, E.L.: The biological hydrogen production potential of agroindustrial residues. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 6, 273–280 (2015)
Pan, N.C., Vignoli, J.A., Baldo, C., Pereira, H.C.B., Silva, R.S.S.F., Celligoi, M.A.P.C.: Agroindustrial byproducts for the production of hyaluronic acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus ATCC 39920. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 4, 114–118 (2015)
Pan, C.N., Pereira, B.C.H., da Silva, C.L.M., Vasconcelos, D.F.A., Celligoi, C.P.A.M.: Improvement production of hyaluronic acid by Streptococcus zooepidemicus in sugarcane molasses. Appl. Biochem. Biotechol. 182, 276–293 (2017)
Yadav, S., Chandra, R.: Biodegradation of organic compounds of molasses melanoidin (MM) from biomethanated distillery spent wash (BMDS) during the decolourisation by a potential bacterial consortium. Biodegradation 23, 609–620 (2012)
Taskin, M., Ortucu, S., Unver, Y., Tasar, O.C., Ozdemir, M., Kaymak, H.C.: Invertase production and molasses decolourization by cold-adapted filamentous fungus Cladosporium herbarum ER-25 in non-sterile molasses medium. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 103, 136–143 (2016)
Orak, T., Caglar, O., Ortucu, S., Ozkan, H., Taskin, M.: Chicken feather peptone: a new alternative nitrogen source for pigment production by Monascus purpureus. J. Biotechnol. 271, 56–62 (2018)
Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A., Smith, F.: Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28, 350–356 (1956)
Fong, C.B., Nielsen, L.K.: Aerobic cultivation of Streptococcus zooepidemicus and the role of NADH oxidase. Biochem. Eng. J. 16, 153–162 (2003)
Oliveira, A.H., Ogrodowski, C.C., de Macedo, A.C., Santana, M.H.A., Gonçalves, L.R.B.: Cashew apple juice as microbial cultivation medium for non-immunogenic hyaluronic acid production. Braz. J. Microbiol. 44, 1097–1104 (2013)
Kosakai, M., Yosizawa, Z.: A partial modification of the carbazole method of bitter and muir for quantitation of hexuronic acids. Anal. Biochem. 93, 295–298 (1979)
Oueslati, N., Leblanc, P., Harscoat-Schiavo, C., Rondags, E., Meunier, S., Kapel, R., Marc, I.: CTAB turbidimetric method for assaying hyaluronic acid in complex environments and under cross-linked form. Carbohydr. Polym. 112, 102–108 (2014)
Hikima, T., Nonomura, Y.: Powderization of wool keratin by alkali hydrolysis in higher alcohol/water binary systems. Chem. Lett. 37, 338–339 (2008)
Aroskar, V.J., Kamat, S.D., Kamat, D.V.: Effect of various nutritional supplements on hyaluronic acid production. IIOAB 2, 1 (2012)
Takara, K., Ushijima, K., Wada, K., Iwasaki, H., Yamashita, M.: Phenolic compounds from sugarcane molasses possessing antibacterial activity against cariogenic bacteria. J. Oleo Sci. 56, 611–614 (2007)
Liu, L., Du, G., Chen, J., Wang, M., Sun, J.: Enhanced hyaluronic acid production by a two-stage culture strategy based on the modelling of batch and fed-batch cultivation of Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 8532–8536 (2008)
Jagannath, S., Ramachandran, K.B.: Influence of competing metabolic processes on the molecular weight of hyaluronic acid synthesized by Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Biochem. Eng. J. 48, 148–158 (2010)
Klompong, V., Benjakul, S., Kantachote, D., Shahidi, F.: Characteristics and use of yellow stripe trevally hydrolysate as culture media. J. Food Sci. 74, 219–225 (2009)
Chen, S.J., Chen, J.L., Huang, W.C., Chen, H.L.: Fermentation process development for hyaluronic acid production by Streptococcus zooepidemicus ATCC 39920. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 26, 428–432 (2009)
Im, J.H., Song, J.M., Kang, J.H., Kang, D.J.: Optimization of medium components for high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid production by Streptococcus sp. ID9102 via a statistical approach. J. Ind. Microbiol Biotechnol. 36, 1337 (2009)
Linder, L., Holme, T., Frostell, G.: Hyaluronidase and aminopeptidase activity in cultures of Streptococcus mitis ATCC 903. Acta. Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. B 82, 521–526 (1974)
Hynes, W.L., Walton, S.L.: Hyaluronidases of gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbial. Lett. 183, 201–207 (2000)
Pourzardosht, N., Rasaee, M.J.: Improved yield of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid production in a stable strain of Streptococcus zooepidemicus via the elimination of the hyaluronidase-encoding gene. Mol. Biotechnol. 59, 192–199 (2017)
Hu, G., Sandham, H.J.: Streptococcal utilization of lactic acid and its effect on pH. Arch. Oral Biol. 17, 729–743 (1972)
Gudina, E., Rodrigues, A., Alves, E., Domingues, M., Teixeira, J., Rodrigues, L.: Bioconversion of agro-industrial by-products in rhamnolipids toward applications in enhanced oil recovery and bioremediation. Bioresour. Technol. 177, 87–93 (2015)
Liu, L., Wang, M., Du, G., Chen, J.: Enhanced hyaluronic acid production of Streptococcus zooepidemicus by an intermittent alkaline-stress strategy. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 46, 383–388 (2008)
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arslan, N.P., Aydogan, M.N. Evaluation of Sheep Wool Protein Hydrolysate and Molasses as Low-Cost Fermentation Substrates for Hyaluronic Acid Production by Streptococcus zooepidemicus ATCC 35246. Waste Biomass Valor 12, 925–935 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01062-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01062-w