Abstract
Neoechinorhynchus (Neoechinorhynchus) dighaensis n. sp. is described from the intestine of the fourfinger threadfin fish Eleutheronema tetradactylum (Shaw, 1804) from the Digha coast, West Bengal, India. Females were larger than males. In the male dorso-ventral lacunar canals well developed. Middle hooks in perfect circle, smaller than anterior hooks. Posterior hooks slightly smaller than middle hooks. Lateral anterior proboscis hooks larger than the others in same circles. Lateral posterior proboscis hooks equal to others in same circles. Lemnisci equal, longer reaching to testes in male. Male reproductive system usually occupies half of the total body length. Eggs were elliptical in shape with concentric membrane. Cement gland long, containing seven giant nuclei.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Majority of the acanthocephalan (62.7%) species mainly infecting aquatic hosts (Kennedy 2006). Neoechinorhynchus is a freshwater acanthocephalan genus, mostly reported from various freshwater worldwide but few literatures also available on marine water fishes (Linton 1932; Podder 1937; Tripathi 1956; Chandra et al. 1984; Gupta and Fatma 1987; Gupta and Kumar 1987). Of the 109 nominal species described as belonging to Neoechinorhynchus, Amin (2002) considered only 48 valid species. The diversity of marine Neoechinorhynchus is incomplete especially in India.
Diseases caused by metazoan parasites are very common throughout the world and particularly in the tropic countries. Fishes serve as definitive or intermediate hosts in the life cycle of metazoan parasites. They affect fishes by lowering their body weights, reproduction and high mortality. Eleutheronema tetradactylum (Shaw 1804) is commonly known as Indian salmon or fourfinger threadfin fish is having a wide range of salinity tolerance, thus an amphidromous marine species migrating to brackish and freshwater (Riede 2004). The knowledge on the endoparasites of these fish species are very much essential due to hosts amphidromous habitat, possibly the evolution of parasites to adopt a wide range of salinity tolerance. Gudivada and Vankara (2010) and Gudivada et al. (2012) reported that Threadfin fishes, Polydactylus sextarius and E. tetradactylum were plagued with a number of metazoan parasites of different phyla such as monogeneans, digeneans, nematodes, acanthocephalans, copepods and isopods. Interestingly, Gudivada et al. (2012) also reported that the diversity of ectoparasites in E. tetradactylum equal to endoparasites.
In this study Parasites from the intestine of brackish water threadfin fish, Eleutheronema tetradactylum were collected from Digha, coast, West Bengal, India and identified to be a new species which is described here. Newly collected parasites were described in detail using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Materials and methods
Specimen collection
Marine and brackish water fishes were examined for the infection of acanthocephalan parasites, which were collected from Digha coast, West Bengal. Fishes were identified with the help of FAO species identification sheets, Western Indian Ocean. Eleutheronema tetradactylum was found to be infected with Neoechinorhynchus. Live specimens of Neoechinorhynchus were collected from the intestine of host and kept in normal saline. Parasites fixed in AFA fixative {Alcohol (50%): formalin: acetic acid (100: 6: 2.5)}. Specimens stained with acetoalum carmine, dehydrated in ascending grades of ethanol (30, 50, 70, 90% and absolute ethanol), cleared in xylene and mounted in DPX. Figures were drawn with Camera Lucida, attached to Phase Contrast Microscope (Olympus CX-41). Measurements of parasites were taken with the aid of calibrated ocular micrometer. All measurements are given in micrometer, unless otherwise noted. The parasites were identified using conventional morphological criteria by Amin (2002) and literature available (Amin and Muzzall 2009; Gudivada et al. 2010). Specimens were deposited in Gangetic Plane Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India (ZSI), Patna, India and also in Zoobank. Paratypes were deposited in the “Helminthology lab”, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, U.P., India.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Acanthocephalan parasites were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 2–4 h at 4 °C, washed with phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.2) for 3 times at the interval of 15 min. Then post-fixation was done with 1% osmium tetraoxide for 2 h at 4 °C and then washed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 3 times each of 15 min at 4 °C to remove the unreacted fixative. Samples were mounted on to the stubs with adhesive tape (carbon), the sample was kept in desiccators for overnight and coated with palladium sputter coater and viewed with a scanning electron microscope (JEOL 6490 LV).
Results
Systematics
-
Systematics are based on Amin (2002) and Bhattacharya, (2007)
-
Phylum Acanthocephala
-
Class Eoacanthocephala Van Cleave 1948
-
Order Gyracanthocephala Van Cleave 1936
-
Family Neoechinorhynchidae Van Cleave 1919
-
Subfamily Neoechinorhynchinae Travassos 1926
-
Genus Neoechinorhynchus Hamann, 1892
-
Species Neoechinorhynchus dighaensis n. sp.
Specimens studied
Four males, five females. Canada balsam slides and 1 female for SEM.
Holotype male registration No. ZSI/GPRC, IV-4359(a) and Alotype female Registration No. ZSI/GPRC, IV-4359 (b). Paratypes: Males-LU/Z/2018/01, LU/Z/2018/02, LU/Z/2018/03, Females-LU/Z/2018/04, LU/Z/2018/05, LU/Z/2018/06.
Description
Males were creamy white in color. Total body length of males 4.50–4.82 mm long by 0.32–0.69 mm wide, a maximum width in middle of the body. Body wall of males with well-developed reticular lacunar system (Fig. 1b). Trunk cylindrical, aspinose, fusiform curved ventrally, widest in middle two-third, attenuating posteriorly (Fig. 1a, b), 4.42–4.71 mm long by 0.32–0.69 mm. Neck rudimentary. Proboscis globular, short spheroid slightly longer than wide, rounded anteriorly (Fig. 1c), 70–80 long, 60–70 wide. Proboscis with the very short neck. Apical organ apparently contractile occasionally extending to full length of proboscis. Proboscis hooks in three circles of six hooks in each (Fig. 3). All hooks rooted (Fig. 1d). Lateral anterior proboscis hooks larger than the others in the same circle hooks. Hooks in anterior circle powerful, with well-developed roots. Length of proboscis hooks in anterior circle 50–52 (lateral anterior). Middle hooks perfect circle, smaller than anterior hooks, 43–44 (middle anterior), middle circle hooks twice of the third circle, pointed with small roots; 30 long (Fig. 1d). Posterior hooks slightly smaller than middle hooks. Middle and posterior hooks with discoid bases (Fig. 1d).Hooks of basal circle similar, spiniform, with very small roots; 13 long. Proboscis receptacle receptacle single-walled, 270–390 long by 70–110 wide. Lemnisci equal elongate, much longer than receptacle, reaching to anterior testes, 1.40–1.93 mm long, 50 wide. Reproductive system usually occupies half of the body length. Testis oval, partially overlapping, contiguous almost equal in size, measuring anterior testis 450–640 long by 150–340 wide while posterior testis 450–650 long by 150–350 wide. Cement gland 360–720 long by 150–360 wide containing seven giant nuclei. Cement gland reservoir 430–439 long by 110–117 wide. Saefftigen’s pouch oval–shaped with blunt end; 150–550 long and 50–90 wide posteriorly. Bursa was almost oval in shape measuring 47–50 long by 46–50 wide.
Females were creamy white in color with annulation on body and larger than male with long ribbon like body, measuring 5.15–6.7 mm long by 0.65–0.69 mm wide, a clyndical, attenuating posterioly (Fig. 3a, b). Proboscis of females very short as compare to total body length, with rudimentary neck, measuring 110–110 long, 10–90 wide. Hooks of anterior row are much larger than the other two rows. Proboscis receptacles of females thick, single layered, cylindrical, measuring 320–390 long by 110–130 wide. Lemensci in females long cylindrical equal in size, reaching to half of the body, 2.20–3.30 mm long, 70–170 wide. The body of females devoid of spines and lacunar system. Body wall composed of thick outermost layer of cuticle. Female reproductive system consists of ovarian bells, uterine bell, uterus and vagina (Fig. 3c). At the posterior end of the uterine bell, there are two guard cells, which serve the function of separating the mature from the immature ova. Uterine bell 100 long by 40 wide, gonopore terminal. Uterus 210 long and 50 wide. Female body filled with ovarian ball measuring 80–110 wide and 50–60 wide. Mature eggs are elliptical in shape with the concentric membrane, measuring 60 long, 30 wide at greatest width (Fig. 3d).
Taxonomic summary
-
Type host: Eleutheronema tetradactylum (Shaw, 1804)
-
Site of infection: Intestine
-
Type locality: Digha, West Bengal, India (21.6266°N, 87.5074°E)
-
Zoobank registration No. lsid:zoobank.org:pub:04C49E29-463F-42D3-B865-11B1BB4274AF
-
Etymology: The new species is named as per the site of collection of the host and parasite.
Discussion
The newly collected specimens placed in the genus Neoechinorhynchus Hamann, 1892 because of the presence of three circles of six hooks each on the proboscis and a single layered proboscis sheath with ganglion at its base. Present parasites compared with eight species, Neoechinorhynchus dimorphospinus (Amin and Sey 1996); Neoechinorhynchus curemai (Noronha 1973); Neoechinorhynchus pseudemydis (Cable and Hopp 1954); Neoechinorhynchus emydis (Leidy 1851); Neoechinorhynchus emyditoides (Fisher 1960); Neoechinorhynchus chelonos (Schmidt, Esch and Gibbons, 1970); Neoechinorhynchus constrictus (Little and Hopkins 1968); Neoechinorhynchus stunkardi (Cable and Fisher 1961) in having elliptical shape eggs with concentric egg membranes. It further differs from above mentioned species except N. dimorphospinus in having lateral proboscis hooks unequal in size.
Length of posterior proboscis hooks of males and females N. dimorphospinus 23–36 and 26–40 respectively but in Neoechinorhynchus dighaensis n. sp. form 13 in males and 14 in females. Length of anterior lateral hooks of males and females in N. dimorphospinus is 59–96 and 59–100 respectively but in Neoechinorhynchus dighaensis n. sp., 50–52 in males and 40 in females; other anterior hooks 51–86 (66) in males, 51–92 (68) in females but in present form 30 in male and 27 mm in females. Proboscis 65–110 long, 91–130 wide in males, 86–110 long, 96–150 wide in females but in N. dighaensis n. sp. 70–110 long, 60–100 wide. Eggs were ovoid shape in N. dimorphospinus but in the new species eggs elliptical in shape and measuring 30–60. Cement gland nuclei seven in number. A table comparing the measurements of present species with N. dimorphospinus is given (Table 1). All these differences are sufficient to describe the current specimens as a new species Neoechinorhynchus dighaensis n. sp.
References
Amin OM (2002) Revision of Neoechinorhynchus Stiles & Hassall, 1905 (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae) with keys to 88 species in two subgenera. Syst Parasitol 53:1–18
Amin OM, Muzzall PM (2009) Redescription of Neoechinorhynchus tenellus (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae) from Esox lucius (Esocidae) and Sander vitreus (Percidae) among other Percid and Centrarchid fish in Michigan, USA. Comp Parasitol 76:44–50
Amin OM, Sey O (1996) Acanthocephala from Arabian Gulf fishes of Kuwait, with descriptions of Neoechinorhynchus dimorphospinus sp. n. (Neoechinorhynchidae), Tegorhynchus holospinus sp. n. (Illiosentidae), Micracanthorhynchina kuwaitensis sp. n. (Rhadinorhynchidae), and Slendrorhynchus breviclaviproboscis gen. n., sp., n. (Diplosentidae); and a key to species of the genus Micracanthorhynchina. J Helminthol Soc Washington 63(2):201–210
Bhattacharya SB (2007) Handbook on Indian Acanthocephala. Zoological Survey of India Kolkata. pp 1–225
Chandra KJ, Hanumantha Rao K, Shyamasundari K (1984) On Neocehinorhynchus argentatus n. sp. An acanthocephalan parasite from a marine fish of waltair. Rivista Di Parassitologia vol. I (XLV): 49–52
Gudivada M, Vankara AP (2010) Population dynamics of metazoan parasites of marine Threadfin fish, Polydactylus sextarius (Bloch and Schneider, 1801) from Visakhapatnam coast, Bay of Bengal. The Bioscan 5(4):555–561
Gudivada M, Chikkam V, Vankara AP (2010) On a new species of Neoechinorhynchus Hamann, 1892 (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchoidea Southwell et Macfie, 1925) from Indian threadfin fish, Leptomelanosoma indicum Shaw, 1804 from Visakhapatnam coast, Andhra Pradesh. Ind J Parasitic Dis 34(2):89–93
Gudivada M, Vankara AP, Chikkam V (2012) Population dynamics of metazoan parasites of marine threadfin fish, Eleutheronema tetradactylum (shaw, 1804) from Visakhapatnam coast, Bay of Bengal. Cibtech J Zool 1(1):14–32
Gupta V, Fatma S (1987) On some acanthocephalan parasites (Rhadinorhynchidae) from fishes of Kerala, Puri and Tamil Nadu. Ind J Helm 39(1):1–26
Gupta PC, Kumar P (1987) Two new species of acanthocephalan parasites (Rhadinorhynchidae) of marine fishes off Puri coast. Kan Univ Res J (Science) 5:75–80
Hamann O (1892) Das System der Acanthocephalen. Zoologischer Anzeiger 15:195–197
Kennedy CR (2006) Ecology of the acanthocephala. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1–240
Linton E (1932) On taxonomic position of Echinorhynchus sagittifer Linton. Science 76:193
Podder TN (1937) A new species of Acanthocephala Neoechinorhynchus topseyi n.sp. from Calcutta fish, Olynemus heptadactylus (Cuv. andVal.). Parasitology 29(3):365–369
Riede K (2004) Global register of migratory species-from global to regional scales. Final Report of the R&D-Projekt 808 05 081. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn, Germany. p 329
Shaw G (1804) General zoology or systematic natural history, vol 5. Part 1. Pisces. G. Kearsley, London
Tripathi YR (1956) Studies on parasites of Indian fishes V. Acanthocephalans. Rec Ind Mus 54(1/2):61–99
Van Cleave HJ (1919) Acanthocephala from the Illinois River, with descriptions of species and a synopsis of the family Neoechinorhynchidae. Bulletin Illinois Nat Hist Surv 13:225–257
Acknowledgements
We thank the University Grants Commission, New Delhi for the financial assistance through a Rajeev Gandhi National Fellowship (F1-17.1/2013-14/RGNF-2013-14-SC-UTT-43684/(SAIII/Website). We also thank USIC, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow for providing SEM facility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Neelam Kumari Gautam: Data collection, analysis, drawing of the figures and drafting the manuscript. Anil Mohapatra: Data collection, fish identification and revising the manuscript. A. M. Saxena: Conception and design of study. Revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in the study involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the study was conducted.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gautam, N.K., Mohapatra, A. & Saxena, A.M. On a new species of Neoechinorhynchus Hamann, 1892 (Neoechinorhynchinae Travassos, 1926) from Eleutheronema tetradactylum (Shaw, 1804) from Digha coast, West Bengal, India. J Parasit Dis 42, 462–466 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-018-1019-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-018-1019-6