Abstract
Mesenchymal cell populations, referred to as mesenchymal stem cells or multipotent stromal cells (MSCs), which include bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), umbilical cord stromal cells and adipose stromal cells (ASCs), participate in tissue repair when transplanted into damaged or degenerating tissues. The trophic support and immunomodulation provided by MSCs can protect against tissue damage, and the differentiation potential of these cells may help to replace lost cells. MSCs are easily accessible and can be expanded on a large scale. In addition, BMSCs and ASCs can be harvested from the patient himself. Thus, MSCs are considered promising candidates for cell therapy. In this review, I will discuss recently discovered high-efficiency induction systems for deriving Schwann cells and neurons from MSCs. Other features of MSCs that are important for tissue repair include the self-renewing property of stem cells and their potential for differentiation. Thus, I will also discuss the stemness of MSCs and describe the discovery of a certain stem cell type among adult MSCs that can self-renew and differentiate into cells of all three germ layers. Furthermore, I will explore the prospects of using this cell population for cell therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In 1968, Friedens et al. discovered the existence of non-hematopoietic cell populations in bone marrow, which are referred to as mesenchymal stem cells or multipotent stromal cells (MSCs). These cells are found in the mononucleated cell fraction of bone marrow, similar to hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and endothelial precursors (Thomas 2000), and they structurally and functionally support hematopoiesis. Although the expression of cell surface markers on MSCs varies with the culture conditions employed, the majority of this cell population express mesenchymal cell markers such as CD29 (β1 integrin), CD90 (Thy-1), CD54 (ICAM-1), CD44 (H-CAM), CD71 (transferrin receptor), CD105 (SH2), SH3, Stro-1, and CD13 (Pittenger et al. 1999, 2000). MSCs are easily accessible by bone marrow aspiration, can be isolated from the patients themselves, and are expandable on a large scale. For example, 1 × 107 MSCs can be obtained from 20–100 ml of bone marrow aspirate within several weeks, which is a sufficient amount for cell therapy. Compared with embryonic stem (ES) cells, there is no serious ethical problem for collecting MSCs, because there is no need to use fertilized eggs or fetuses. Thus, MSCs are considered a promising candidate for cell therapy.
Recently, MSCs have attracted increasing attention for the treatment of damaged tissues, for a number of reasons. One reason is that MSCs can protect the host tissue by providing trophic support and by regulating the immune response (Abdi et al. 2008; Kitada and Dezawa 2009). The second reason is the potential of MSCs to differentiate into other cell types to replace lost cells in damaged and degenerating tissues. Recent studies have demonstrated that mesenchymal tissues other than bone marrow, such as Wharton’s jelly of the umbilical cord and adipose tissue, possess cell populations with properties similar to those of MSCs derived from bone marrow (Hida et al. 2008; Kim et al. 2004; Musina et al. 2008; Prockop 1997; Romanov et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2004; Zuk et al. 2001). MSCs derived from bone marrow, umbilical cord, and adipose tissue are referred to as bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), umbilical cord stromal cells (UCSCs), and adipose stromal cells (ASCs), respectively.
Trophic effects of MSCs
The trophic effects of MSCs are exerted by a wide variety of trophic factors, such as nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neuregulin-1, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), insulin-like growth factor-1, and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), which are secreted after grafting into damaged tissues, such as injured brain and spinal cord (Crigler et al. 2006; Mahmood et al. 2004; Yoshihara et al. 2007; Qu et al. 2007; Nakano et al. 2010). This trophic support provided by MSCs reduces apoptosis and enhances neovascularization, thereby contributing to tissue protection. Indeed, when transplanted into injured or degenerating tissue, in diseases such as stroke, spinal cord injury, and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, an animal model of multiple sclerosis, MSCs migrate to the lesion sites and contribute to histological and functional recovery (Yoshihara et al. 2007; Chopp and Li 2002; Chopp et al. 2000, 2008; Ohta et al. 2004a; Qu et al. 2007, 2008; Zhang et al. 2005, 2006; Ide et al. 2010). Consequently, BMSCs and ASCs have been applied in clinical trials for acute and chronic spinal cord injury in several countries. Our research group has reported that neural stem cells (NSCs) and BMSCs can be administered into the cerebrospinal fluid, through which these cells are able to migrate to the lesion sites, where they exert their trophic effects (Bai et al. 2003; Wu et al. 2002a, b; Ohta et al. 2004a, b). With this method, the transplanted BMSCs can elicit functional recovery, based on the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan score, which is the standard test to evaluate locomotor activity in the rat spinal cord injury model (Ohta et al. 2004a, Wu et al. 2003). This method has also been implemented in a clinical trial (Saito et al. 2008).
Immunomodulatory effects of MSCs
Because of the ability of MSCs to modulate the immune response, they are frequently considered immune-privileged. The immunomodulatory effect of MSCs was first recognized as their ability to suppress T-cell proliferation induced by mitogens for T cells, such as CD3/CD28, and alloantigens (Bartholomew et al. 2002; Le Blanc et al. 2003). MSCs can exert this suppressive effect on allogeneic and xenogeneic T cells. Soluble factors secreted by MSCs, including transforming growth factor β, HGF, prostaglandin E2, interleukin-10, and indolamine 2,3-dioxygenase, as well as inducible factors such as nitric oxide synthase and heme oxygenase-1, are thought to mediate this immunosuppressive effect (Tyndall et al. 2007; Meisel et al. 2004; Sato et al. 2007; Chabannes et al. 2007; Aggarwal and Pittenger 2005; Di Nicola et al. 2002). These factors also affect immune cell function, including cytokine secretion and the cytotoxicity of T cells and NK cells (Krampera et al. 2003; Rasmusson et al. 2003; Zappia et al. 2005; Spaggiari et al. 2006). These proteins also modulate the proliferation and maturation of B cells, and their ability to secrete antibodies (Schena et al. 2010; Asari et al. 2009; Tabera et al. 2008; Bochev et al. 2008; Corcione et al. 2006), as well as the maturation, antigen presentation ability, activation, and migration of dendritic cells (Ramasamy et al. 2007; Kronsteiner et al. 2011; Huang et al. 2010; Aldinucci et al. 2010; Magatti et al. 2009; English et al. 2008). In addition, MSCs are considered hypoimmunogenic because of their low expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I proteins and no expression of class II (Tse et al. 2003; Uccelli et al. 2006). These in vitro characteristics of MSCs are regarded as being beneficial for cell therapy. Indeed, many studies have demonstrated the survival of MSCs after transplantation, including xenotransplantation (Tse et al. 2003; Liechty et al. 2000; Niemeyer et al. 2006; Fibbe et al. 2007; Wei et al. 2009; Nakamura et al. 2007; Dai et al. 2005). Other studies, however, have observed the rejection of MSCs after allogeneic transplantation in mice (Nauta et al. 2006; Eliopoulos et al. 2005). Our study also showed that human BMSCs grafted into the injured peripheral nerve in rats were gradually rejected with mild immunosuppression (Shimizu et al. 2007). Differences in isolation methods, culture conditions, strains, transplantation methods, and animal models may have contributed to these conflicting findings (Abdi et al. 2008; Ryan et al. 2005). It should be noted that MSCs may not be immunologically privileged in all experimental paradigms or protocols, and thus the optimization of these methods is critical and indispensable for the application of MSCs for cell therapy.
Differentiation potential of MSCs
By the end of the twentieth century, it was known that BMSCs had the capacity to differentiate into cells belonging to the same hierarchical lineage as osteocytes, chondrocytes, and adipocytes (Pittenger et al. 1999; Prockop 1997). The similar differentiation potential of UCSCs and ASCs has also been demonstrated (Kim et al. 2004; Romanov et al. 2003; Zuk et al. 2001). The unusual plasticity of MSCs was first discovered in two in vivo studies (Mezey et al. 2000; Ferrari et al. 1998). Ferrari et al. observed lacZ expression in skeletal muscle cells and satellite cells, the stem cell fraction of skeletal muscle, after transplantation of bone marrow cells derived from C57/MlacZ mice into the injured tibialis anterior muscle of scid/bg mice. After producing a secondary injury, nuclear lacZ expression was detected in skeletal muscle cells, as well as satellite cells, suggesting that the transplanted bone marrow cells differentiated into myogenic progenitor cells (Ferrari et al. 1998). Mezey et al. (2000) transplanted bone marrow cells derived from male mice into the intact brains of female mice and demonstrated the presence of the Y chromosome in neurons in the brains of female mice, suggesting that the transplanted bone marrow cells differentiated into neurons. The authors of these studies proposed that the MSCs spontaneously differentiated into skeletal muscle-lineage cells and neurons; however, the clonality of these cells was not demonstrated. Other studies have suggested that the spontaneous differentiation conjecture was due to incorrect data interpretation, and that the correct reason was the fusion of transplanted MSCs with host cells (Alvarez-Dolado et al. 2003; Terada et al. 2002). However, the cell fusion hypothesis cannot account in all cases for the frequency and ratio of MSCs integrated or their differentiation into cells with specific markers. Recent studies have demonstrated that MSCs can differentiate into endothelial cells and cardiac-lineage cells after transplantation through a mechanism independent of cell fusion (Harris et al. 2004; Kajstura et al. 2005). Spontaneous differentiation of MSCs after transplantation is still under debate at this moment, and a thorough evaluation is required to demonstrate spontaneous differentiation.
In contrast, studies performed in the last quarter of a century have elucidated the differentiation potential of MSCs with in vitro experiments; they have been shown to possess the potential to differentiate into skeletal muscle cells (Wakitani et al. 1995; Mizuno et al. 2002; Di Rocco et al. 2006; Gang et al. 2004), cardiac muscle cells (Makino et al. 1999; Qian et al. 2011; Yan et al. 2011; Kadivar et al. 2006; Rangappa et al. 2003), endothelial cells (Oswald et al. 2004; Cao et al. 2005; Gang et al. 2006), hepatocytes (Oyagi et al. 2006; Prindull and Zipori 2004; Snykers et al. 2009; Pournasr et al. 2011), neuronal cells (Mitchell et al. 2003; Sanchez-Ramos et al. 2000; Woodbury et al. 2000; Zuk et al. 2002; Safford et al. 2002; Kim et al. 2002), and insulin-producing cells (Tang et al. 2004; Timper et al. 2006; Chao et al. 2008), revealing the pluripotency of MSCs. While these findings clearly demonstrate the wide-ranging differentiation potential of MSCs, the ratio of cells differentiating into the target cell type is generally low. Thus, it may be difficult to obtain a sufficient number of cells for therapy. Recently, our research group has developed and improved on the novel efficient induction systems for generating peripheral glia, neurons, and skeletal muscle cells from BMSCs and UCSCs on a therapeutic scale (Dezawa et al. 2001, 2004, 2005; Hayase et al. 2009; Matsuse et al. 2010, 2011; Nagane et al. 2009; Shimizu et al. 2007; Wakao et al. 2010). In the following sections, the development of and recent improvements in induction systems for peripheral glial cells and neurons are summarized.
Induction of Schwann cells from MSCs and application to nerve repair
Schwann cells are the glial cells of the peripheral nervous system (PNS); they constitute the myelin sheath that envelopes the axon to achieve saltatory conduction of the action potential. Schwann cells possess great potential for nerve regeneration; the formation of bands of Bünger after the migration, proliferation, and activation of these cells in injured peripheral nerve and the production of basement membrane, both of which provide regenerating axons with the appropriate growth environment. In addition, Schwann cells secrete trophic factors, including NGF, BDNF, ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), and bFGF, to rescue damaged neurons from apoptosis and facilitate the growth of regenerating axons. Owing to the physical and trophic support provided by Schwann cells, peripheral neurons can actively regenerate axons that can grow through the site of injury and participate in the functional recovery of the injured peripheral nerve (Dubovy 2004; Ide 1996; Chen et al. 2007; Geuna et al. 2010).
In contrast to PNS neurons, for a long time (ever since the observations of the pioneer neuroscientist Ramón y Cajal in 1928) it was believed that neurons in the central nervous system (CNS) do not to have the capacity to regenerate axons. However, Aguayo and his colleagues demonstrated that CNS axons in the rat brain and spinal cord could regenerate through peripheral nerve grafts that were up to 35 mm in length, thus demonstrating that CNS axons have the capacity to regenerate and that the inappropriate environment inhibits regeneration (David and Aguayo 1981; Benfey and Aguayo 1982). After these ground-breaking investigations, numerous studies have shown that Schwann cells can support the regeneration of axons and reconstruct the myelin sheath to contribute to the functional recovery of the damaged CNS (Kromer and Cornbrooks 1987; Harvey et al. 1995; Raisman 1997; Anderson et al. 1998). However, it was difficult to obtain a sufficient amount of Schwann cells for clinical application. In addition, another peripheral nerve must be sacrificed to harvest Schwann cells to treat the damaged nerve. Thus, there was an urgent need to establish a system in which cells with the capacity to behave like Schwann cells in the injured nerve could be efficiently induced from easily accessible sources and rapidly expanded.
Due to their ability to differentiate into numerous cell types, BMSCs were used for the development of the novel induction system for Schwann cells (Dezawa et al. 2001). This system can be applied to MSCs, including BMSCs derived from rat, monkey, and human, as well as human UCSCs (Dezawa et al. 2001; Matsuse et al. 2010; Shimizu et al. 2007; Wakao et al. 2010). MSCs were sequentially treated with β-mercaptoethanol and all-trans-retinoic acid, and cultured with soluble factors including forskolin (FSK), bFGF, platelet-derived growth factor, and neuregulin. Although BMSCs exhibit a spindle-shaped and elongated fibroblast-like morphology, they change their morphology to resemble native Schwann cells after induction (Fig. 1) (Wakao et al. 2010). Immunocytochemistry for Schwann cell markers, such as S100, P0, p75, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), L1, and O4, showed that while BMSCs did not initially express any of these markers, except for the slight expression of S100, all of these markers were expressed in the induced cells (Fig. 2) (Shimizu et al. 2007). Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) demonstrated that, initially, UCSCs did not express P0 and S100b, slightly expressed Sox10 and Krox20, and strongly expressed Hath1, the human homolog of Atoh1. During the subsequent treatment, P0 and S100b began to be expressed, and Sox10 and Krox20 were up-regulated, while Hath1 was down-regulated in the induced cells, suggesting that this induction system mimics the normal development of Schwann cells (Fig. 3) (Matsuse et al. 2010). The induced cells derived from the UCSCs were transplanted into the severed sciatic nerve of rats, and recovery was estimated by histological and behavioral analyses. Gross anatomy of the graft showed that tissues inside the graft from both the UCSC-derived Schwann cell- and human Schwann cell-transplanted groups appeared whiter and looked more like neural tissue compared with tissue derived from the UCSC-transplanted group, although the tissue derived from the matrigel only-transplanted group displayed no parenchymatous tissue inside the graft (Fig. 4a–d) (Matsuse et al. 2010). Under low magnification, immunohistochemistry for the neurofilament protein, one of the components of the axon that constitutes the intermediate filament bundle, demonstrated that the extent of axonal regeneration in the UCSC-derived Schwann cell-transplanted group was significantly greater than that in the UCSC-transplanted group, and statistically similar to that observed in the human Schwann cell-transplanted group (Fig. 4e–g) (Matsuse et al. 2010). At a higher magnification, the green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive transplanted cells localized inside the graft were in physical contact with the regenerating axons and expressed myelin markers such as myelin-associated glycoprotein, peripheral myelin protein 22, and periaxin 3 weeks after transplantation (Fig. 5) (Matsuse et al. 2010). Integration and myelination by the transplanted cells were also confirmed by immunoelectron microscopy for GFP (Matsuse et al. 2010). Behavioral testing, evaluated by walking track analysis based on the sciatic function index (Bain et al. 1989; Hare et al. 1992; Varejao et al. 2001), revealed greater functional recovery in the UCSC-derived Schwann cell-transplanted group than in the UCSC-transplanted group. No statistically significant difference was observed in the level of functional recovery between the UCSC-derived Schwann cell- and human Schwann cell-transplanted groups (Matsuse et al. 2010). Similar results were obtained by other studies, including xenotransplantation of human BMSC-derived cells into the severed sciatic nerve of rats, and autologous transplantation of monkey BMSC-derived cells into the severed median nerve (Shimizu et al. 2007; Wakao et al. 2010). In addition, long-term observations of monkey BMSC-derived Schwann cells autologously transplanted into the injured PNS revealed the safety and efficacy of this induction system, up to a period of 12 months. The safety of the grafted cells was evaluated by assessing general health, including weight monitoring and blood testing, such as blood cell counting and blood biochemistry; whole-body image analysis using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography; gross anatomy; and immunohistochemistry for cell proliferation markers. The efficacy was evaluated using electrophysiology, behavioral analysis, and immunohistochemistry against markers for axons and myelin (Wakao et al. 2010). Other research groups have confirmed that this Schwann cell induction system is also applicable to ASCs (Kingham et al. 2007; Jiang et al. 2008; Kaewkhaw et al. 2011; Faroni et al. 2011). Furthermore, the effects of Schwann cells, induced from BMSCs, on the promotion of axonal regeneration, myelination of regenerating axons, and functional recovery have been confirmed in the injured spinal cord (Kamada et al. 2005, 2010; Someya et al. 2008). These studies clearly show that Schwann cells can be induced from MSCs, including BMSCs, UCSCs, and ASCs, in vitro, and that these induced Schwann cells are functional—they are capable of enhancing axonal regeneration and myelination, and they contribute to the functional recovery of the injured nerve.
Induction of functional neurons from MSCs and their application to Parkinson’s disease
Previous studies have shown that MSCs also possess the potential to differentiate into neuronal cells (Kim et al. 2002; Mitchell et al. 2003; Safford et al. 2002; Sanchez-Ramos et al. 2000; Woodbury et al. 2000; Zuk et al. 2002). However, the rates of differentiation of MSCs to neurons in these studies were not high. In addition, skepticism was raised against the particular method of neuronal induction (Lu et al. 2004; Neuhuber et al. 2004). Furthermore, previous protocols were inadequate to provide a sufficient amount of neurons for cell therapy.
We established a procedure in which neuronal cells could be specifically induced from MSCs (Dezawa et al. 2004). The mouse Notch-1 intracellular domain (NICD) was overexpressed in BMSCs by transfecting the NICD cDNA, subcloned into the pCI-neo plasmid, and NICD-transfected cells were selected with G418. The NICD-transfected BMSCs had a moderately reduced cell body size and thinner processes. Their gene expression profile also changed. The expression of the Notch-1 extracellular domain (NECD), the signal transducer, and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1), and STAT3 was all down-regulated after NICD gene transfection (Fig. 6) (Dezawa et al. 2004). In the original protocol reported in 2004 (Dezawa et al. 2004), NICD-transfected BMSCs were treated with trophic factors such as bFGF, FSK, and CNTF in the adherent culture for several days. After treatment, these cells changed into compact, round-shaped cells bearing several thin processes, suggesting differentiation into post-mitotic neuronal cells (Fig. 7) (Kitada and Dezawa 2009). The differentiation of these cells into neurons was confirmed by immunohistochemistry for microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2), β-tubulin class III (Tuj-1), and neurofilament, showing a highly efficient rate of neuronal induction (approximately 96%). Electrophysiology with the patch clamp method revealed action potentials in these cells. The striking feature of this induction system is that the development of glial cells, including GFAP-positive astrocytes and O4-positive oligodendrocyte-lineage cells, is rare. The remainder of the cells were nestin-positive putative neural precursors that were not detected among untreated BMSCs. These findings strongly suggest that the BMSCs successfully differentiated into functional neurons. We then employed these induced neuronal cells in an animal model of neurodegenerative disease.
Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, resulting in a reduction of dopamine in the corpus striatum. Rigidity, poor movement, tremors, and postural instability are the main symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Major therapeutic approaches are the administration of L-dopa and dopamine receptor agonists; and, in fact, these drugs are effective for some symptoms. However, the efficacy of these treatments gradually decreases over time, along with the loss of dopaminergic neurons (Curtis et al. 1984). Another method of treating Parkinson’s disease is transplantation of human fetal dopaminergic neurons, which has been shown to be effective in alleviating neurological symptoms (Lindvall et al. 1994; Kordower et al. 1995; Freed et al. 1992). However, there are difficulties in using fetal cells because of ethical issues and limited supply. Thus, alternative approaches have been investigated for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease.
MSCs can be an alternative source of dopaminergic neurons. Whereas our neuronal induction method using BMSCs was highly efficient at producing post-mitotic neuronal cells, the ratio of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-positive neurons, considered to be dopaminergic neurons, was just 3% after treatment with three different soluble factors (Dezawa et al. 2004). Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is known to enhance the differentiation and survival of midbrain dopaminergic neurons (Lin et al. 1993; Akerud et al. 1999). Thus, we subsequently treated the cells with GDNF. This method was very effective, resulting in 40% of the cells being positive for TH (Fig. 7) (Dezawa et al. 2004; Kitada and Dezawa 2009). RT-PCR revealed that in the GDNF-treated cells, the Nurr1, Lmx1b, En1, and Ptx3 genes, which encode the transcription factors that promote the differentiation of midbrain dopaminergic neurons, were newly expressed (Sakurada et al. 1999; Stromberg et al. 1993). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) confirmed dopamine production and release into the culture medium in response to high-potassium depolarization. These findings clearly show that functional TH-positive dopamine-producing cells can be efficiently induced from BMSCs (Dezawa et al. 2004).
There are several models of Parkinson’s disease. We chose to utilize unilateral intrastriatal injection of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), an animal model for Parkinson’s disease. In this model, the A9 dopaminergic neurons in the injected side of the substantia nigra pars compacta are selectively impaired, and abnormal rotational behavior emerges after subcutaneous injection of apomorphine. Thus, this method has been generally used as the animal model for Parkinson’s disease. We transplanted TH-positive neuronal cells, induced from BMSCs, into the striatum of these animals and performed functional and histological analyses for a period of 10 weeks. Behavioral analysis, including apomorphine-induced rotational behavior, adjusting step test and paw-reaching test, demonstrated a significant improvement in animals receiving cell therapy. Histological analysis indicated that the GFP-labeled transplanted cells had integrated and differentiated into TH-positive neurons in the injected side of the striatum. HPLC analysis revealed the production and release of dopamine in slice culture. In addition, there were no signs of tumorigenesis in the animals analyzed up to 16 weeks. Transplantation of TH-positive neurons, induced from human BMSCs, into rats undergoing immunosuppressant therapy gave similar results. These in vivo findings clearly demonstrate the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of using BMSC-derived dopaminergic neurons in the animal model of Parkinson’s disease (Dezawa et al. 2004).
Improvement in the neuronal induction system
In the original protocol reported in 2004 (Dezawa et al. 2004), we introduced the NICD gene, in the pCI-neo plasmid, using lipofection. We tried to apply this method to BMSCs derived from the Macaca fascicularis monkey for testing the effectiveness and safety of this system for autologous transplantation. However, most of the transfected cells died because of the cytotoxicity of the lipofection reagents, indicating that modification of the protocol was required. In the previous study, we noticed that gene introduction using retrovirus or adenovirus did not result in neuronal cell induction from BMSCs. We interpreted this result as suggesting that the tentative and moderate expression of the transfected NICD gene was critical for the induction of neuronal cells (Dezawa et al. 2004). Thus, we developed the reverse transfection method, which achieved transient expression of the introduced gene (Nagane et al. 2009). The polyamine spermine was introduced into the natural water-soluble polysaccharide pullulan by an N,N′-carbonyldiimidazole activation method to yield spermine–pullulan. Polyion complex (PIC) was obtained by mixing the plasmid DNA with spermine–pullulan. PIC was dispersed onto succinic gelatin and ProNectin-coated culture dishes to adhere PIC. Reverse transfection was performed to apply BMSCs onto the PIC-coated culture dishes after removing PIC. Five key steps are needed for the expression of plasmid DNA: (1) attachment of the plasmid DNA onto the cellular surface; (2) internalization of the plasmid DNA into the cytoplasm; (3) endosomal escape of the plasmid DNA; and (4) transfer and internalization of the plasmid DNA into the nucleus. After 24 h, the Cy5-labeled pCI-NICD plasmid DNA was observed in the cytoplasm and nucleus of monkey BMSCs, suggesting that the five key steps listed above were achieved by the reverse transfection method (Fig. 8) (Nagane et al. 2009). Higher cell viability was observed with the reverse transfection method (97.0 ± 4.1%) compared with the lipofection method using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) (31.6 ± 1.4%). The luciferase assay demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the expression of the transfected gene between the two methods described above at 1, 3, and 5 days after starting the transfection. The optimum ratio of spermine–pullulan nitrogen atoms per plasmid DNA phosphorus atoms was 3:1 among the different ratios examined (1:1, 3:1, and 5:1). These findings demonstrate that the reverse transfection method provides higher cell viability than the lipofection method, with a similar efficiency.
We subsequently applied this reverse transfection method to our neuronal induction system. Three days after starting the transfection, transfected cells were selected using G418 for 5–7 days and treated with trophic factors including bFGF, FSK, and CNTF for 3 days. The induced cells exhibited round cell bodies with neurite-like thin processes, and they expressed the neuronal markers MAP2 and Tuj-1 (Fig. 9) (Nagane et al. 2009). With GDNF treatment for an additional 3 days, TH-positive neurons appeared. The production and release of dopamine by these TH-positive neurons were evaluated by HPLC under high-potassium depolarization stimuli (Fig. 9). We also applied this reverse transfection technique to BMSCs derived from other species, including mice and humans, and obtained similar results. These findings show that the spermine–pullulan-mediated reverse transfection technique is effective for the induction of functional dopaminergic neurons from BMSCs of various species, and that this technique will be applicable to the genetic manipulation of stem cells. We are currently evaluating the efficiency and safety of this induction system for deriving neuronal cells from BMSCs, as well as the feasibility of autologous transplantation in the monkey model of Parkinson’s disease.
The NSC culture method, which was established by Reynolds and Weiss (1992), enables these cells to be cultured while maintaining their stemness. With this protocol, NSCs form neurospheres in suspension culture in serum-free medium supplemented with defined factors. Trophic factors, including bFGF and epidermal growth factor (EGF), are also used in this culture method. In our original protocol for neuronal induction from MSCs, we utilized trophic factors such as bFGF, FSK, and CNTF after selecting NICD gene-containing MSCs in adherent culture. We altered this induction step to suspension cultures incubated with the trophic factors bFGF and EGF, similar to the culture method for NSCs, and found that neurosphere-like BMSC-derived spheres (NS-BMSCs) could be formed by this procedure 8 days after initiating suspension culture (Hayase et al. 2009; Kitada and Dezawa 2009). These spheres, formed by the NICD gene introduced-BMSCs, expressed markers for neural precursor cells, including nestin (61.0 ± 4.8%), NeuroD (96.8 ± 0.9%), and Sox2 (93.9 ± 2.4%), with much higher rates than naive BMSCs (2.3 ± 0.9, 9.4 ± 2.2, and 2.0 ± 1.4%, respectively) (Fig. 10) (Hayase et al. 2009). To evaluate the commitment of these cells to the neural lineage, differentiation of cells from these spheres was induced by a culture medium containing low serum and trophic factors, such as bFGF, FSK, and CNTF, similar to the original protocol for the adherent culture. Adherent rat and human BMSCs exhibited round cell bodies and thin neurite-like processes with abundant varicosities, and they expressed markers for post-mitotic neurons, such as Tuj-1 and MAP2 at high ratios (98.5 ± 0.5 and 95.7 ± 3.7%, respectively). In contrast, the ratio of GFAP-expressing astrocytes was very low (0.7 ± 0.3%). Cells positive for particular neuronal subtype markers, such as glutamate, TH, choline acetyl transferase (ChAT), serotonin, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), were also detected in the differentiated cells (Fig. 10). RT-PCR and real time-PCR confirmed the up-regulation of neuron-specific enolase as well as the expression of ChAT and voltage-gated sodium channel type III Scn3a in these cells. These results demonstrate the successful establishment of a highly efficient alternative method for obtaining neuronal precursors that can differentiate into functional neurons for the treatment of neural diseases. Next, we used these multipotent cells in a rat model of stroke (Hayase et al. 2009).
Recovery from stroke by grafting neurosphere-like spheres derived from BMSCs
Stroke is one of the major causes of death in adult humans, and is characterized by progressive neurological deficits. Effective treatments to restore lost neurological functions are currently unavailable (Bliss et al. 2007; Lindvall and Kokaia 2006). One of the potential strategies for treating stroke is cell therapy with stem/progenitor cells that can replace lost cells. Transplantation of NSCs has been shown to be effective for the treatment of stroke (Chu et al. 2004). NSCs appear to restore lost neurological function through their ability to differentiate, secrete trophic factors, and stimulate endogenous cells. CNS cells, including neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, can give rise to NSCs, which can replace lost host cells (Bithell and Williams 2005). Several types of trophic factors, such as BDNF and GDNF, are secreted by NSCs, which promote the survival of host neural cells (Bithell and Williams 2005; Iguchi et al. 2003). Exogenous NSCs can stimulate host NSCs to produce neural cells de novo (Bithell and Williams 2005; Wechsler and Kondziolka 2003). Thus, NSCs or other cells that possess NSC-like properties are potential candidates for treating stroke (Reubinoff et al. 2001).
As the spheres generated by our modified neuronal induction system resembled neurospheres, we transplanted NS-BMSCs into the infarcted area in the rat stroke model produced by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) (Hayase et al. 2009). The NS-BMSC-transplanted group displayed significant recovery in behavioral analyses for sensorimotor function (limb placing test) and cognitive function (Morris water maze test). Histological analysis revealed a broad distribution of GFP-labeled transplanted cells around the lesion and at the lesion boundary, but their migration was confined to the ipsilateral side. It was surprising that the number of GFP-positive transplanted cells (2.1 × 105 cells) was fourfold higher than the number initially transplanted (5.0 × 104 cells). Immunostaining for Ki67 revealed that 4.7% of the GFP-positive cells were proliferating at 14 days, and that no cells were positive for Ki67 100 days after grafting, suggesting that at least some of the cells were proliferating prior to transplantation, and that these cells stopped dividing 100 days following grafting. No sign of tumorigenesis was detectable up to 100 days after grafting. Immunohistochemistry for a neuronal marker, NeuN, and an astroglial marker, GFAP, demonstrated differentiation of the GFP-positive transplanted cells primarily into neurons (79.5 ± 0.1%) but occasionally astrocytes (1.9 ± 0.03%). Further histological analysis revealed that there were many GFP-positive neuronal cells expressing particular neuronal subtype markers; e.g., dopamine transporter, TH, glutamic acid decarboxylase, glutamate, calbindin, dopamine, adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate-regulated phosphoprotein, and parvalbumin (Hayase et al. 2009). In addition, the GFP-positive transplanted cells exhibited immunoreactivity for synaptophysin around their cell bodies, suggesting synaptogenesis with the host neurons. These findings indicate that the transplanted NS-BMSCs differentiated mainly into neurons and expressed various neurotransmitter-related markers within the host brain to contribute to functional recovery up to 100 days after transplantation.
Compared with the fully differentiated post-mitotic neurons, NS-BMSCs have several advantages for transplantation. First, NS-BMSCs exhibit better survival, distribution, and integration within the host tissue. Previous studies showed that the survival of the transplanted cells was only 20–30% after transplantation, when fully differentiated post-mitotic neurons, derived from BMSCs, were transplanted (Dezawa et al. 2004; Mimura et al. 2005) into animal models of neurotraumatic and neurodegenerative diseases. When NS-BMSCs were transplanted, a fourfold greater number of GFP-positive cells were detected. These findings suggest that the proliferative and migratory capacities of NS-BMSCs are attributable to their immaturity compared to fully differentiated post-mitotic neurons. Second, after transplantation, NS-BMSCs were positive for various transmitter-related markers within the host tissue, and were positive for synaptophysin around their cell bodies. These observations suggest that premature NS-BMSCs have greater flexibility to adapt to the host microenvironment; thus, they are able to differentiate into the appropriate neuronal types, according to the host microenvironment. Third, the preparation of NS-BMSCs is much easier than that of fully differentiated post-mitotic neurons from BMSCs, for which precise culture conditions, including the appropriate cell density at each culturing stage and the proper timing of trophic factor treatment, are critical. Therefore, the modified induction system for establishing NS-BMSCs is likely to be more feasible for treating acute diseases, such as stroke.
Recently we tried to combine this induction system for NS-BMSCs with tissue engineering techniques (Matsuse et al. 2011). Collagen sponges have been widely used as scaffolds for cell transplantation, and this material is already in clinical use (Teramachi et al. 1997). In addition, bFGF is known to promote neovascularization, which is necessary for cell survival, tissue restoration, and maturation of regenerating tissues (Masaki et al. 2002). Repeated infusion of a low dose of bFGF was reported to be more effective than a single high-dose injection (Seko et al. 2009). Thus, we transplanted NS-BMSCs in combination with a collagen sponge and gelatin microspheres incorporating bFGF that provide a sustained release of bFGF. Histological analysis performed 35 days after transplantation showed that the group which received NS-BMSCs with a collagen sponge and bFGF-containing gelatin microspheres (N + C + F group) exhibited significantly less infarct volume compared with the groups treated with PBS (PBS group), a collagen sponge only (C group), a collagen sponge with bFGF-containing gelatin microspheres (C + F group), NS-BMSCs only (N group), or NS-BMSCs with a collagen sponge (N + C group) (Fig. 11) (Matsuse et al. 2011). No massive space-occupying tissue was observed. However, the number of GFP-positive transplanted cells in the N + C + F group was about ninefold higher (1.8 ± 0.42 × 105 cells) than that originally transplanted (2.0 × 104 cells). This was significantly higher than in the N group (3.4 ± 2.1 × 104 cells), but not significantly higher than that in the N + C group (1.5 ± 0.39 × 105 cells). Immunohistochemistry for Ki67 suggested that most of the transplanted cells did not proliferate 35 days after transplantation. More than 95% of the GFP-positive transplanted cells in the N, N + C, and N + C + F groups exhibited immunoreactivity for neuron-specific markers, NeuN, and neurofilament. Significantly more von Willebrand factor-expressing cells were observed at the boundary of the injury cavity in the N + C + F group than in the other groups, indicating enhanced neovascularization in the N + C + F group. The numbers of Pax6- and Sox2-positive cells around the ipsilateral side of the subventricular zone, where the host NSCs reside, were significantly greater in the N + C + F group than in the other groups, indicating stimulation of the proliferation of endogenous stem/precursor cells. Functional assessment throughout the experimental period demonstrated that there was significant recovery in the limb placement test (sensorimotor function) and the beam balance test (vestibulomotor function) in the N + C + F group compared with the other groups, and in the Morris water maze test (cognitive function) in the N + C + F group compared with four other (PBS, C, C + F, and N) groups. Based on the reduction in infarct volume, promotion of neovascularization, and stimulation of endogenous stem/precursor cell populations, it appears that NS-BMSCs and the two biomaterials exert a synergistic effect in this rat stroke model. These findings clearly demonstrate that NS-BMSCs are promising candidates for treating stroke when used in combination with a collagen sponge and bFGF-containing gelatin microspheres.
Why Notch?
As described above, we transfected the NICD-containing pCI-neo plasmid into BMSCs to induce differentiation into functional neurons. The Notch signaling pathway is known to be involved in cell fate determination during development, helping to maintain a pool of uncommitted precursor cell populations (Lundkvist and Lendahl 2001). In particular, Notch signaling appears to be an irreversible trigger for Schwann cell differentiation from neural crest stem cells (Morrison et al. 2000). Thus, we tried to stimulate Notch signaling in BMSCs by transfection, initially intending to obtain Schwann cells; but the result was, surprisingly, quite different from our expectation. Some BMSCs changed morphology, acquiring small round cell bodies bearing several thin processes. After one by one attempts, we established the novel induction system to derive neuronal cells from MSCs.
In contrast, recent studies have shown that Notch signaling inhibits the differentiation of BMSCs into neurons (Yanjie et al. 2007; Jing et al. 2011). In addition, Notch signaling has been shown to promote the self-renewal of and to inhibit the differentiation of NSCs into a more mature state. Notch signaling was also reported to promote the generation of astrocytes from neural precursor cells and to inhibit neurogenesis in collaboration with CNTF. In this process, the phosphorylation status of STAT3 at specific sites appeared to play a critical role (Nagao et al. 2007). We showed in our previous study that the expression of NECD, STAT1, and STAT3 was down-regulated following NICD gene introduction, although the expression of Hes1 and Hes5 was not affected (Fig. 6). Down-regulation of NECD likely indicates negative regulation of the endogenous Notch signaling pathway. Hes1 and Hes5 are known to exert the self-down-regulation effect. In addition, virus-mediated NICD gene transfer did not result in neuronal induction from BMSCs, suggesting that precise timing and the appropriate level of expression are needed for neuronal induction from BMSCs (Dezawa et al. 2004). Collectively, these data may be interpreted as follows: the precise timing and expression level of the NICD gene, mediated by exogenous lipofection-mediated delivery, inhibits endogenous Notch signaling, which, in turn, down-regulates Hes1 and Hes5 expression, which is further reduced by the self-down-regulation mediated by Hes1 and Hes5 themselves and trophic factor treatment. The down-regulation of Hes1 and Hes5 may lead to enhanced Mash1 expression, a neurogenic transcription factor. Recent studies have shown that a mesenchymal cell population, fibroblasts, can be converted into functional neurons by introducing certain transcription factors (Vierbuchen et al. 2010; Pang et al. 2011). Vierbuchen et al. (2010) reported that there was only one transcription factor, Mash1, which could promote neuronal differentiation from fibroblasts, although the rate of differentiation was higher when two additional factors were introduced. Thus, it appears that Mash1 plays a critical role in neuronal differentiation from mesenchymal cell populations, such as BMSCs and fibroblasts.
Stemness of MSCs and discovery of a novel stem cell population among MSCs
Although MSCs are frequently referred to as mesenchymal stem cells, their stemness has not yet been fully demonstrated. A stem cell should fulfill the following requirements: the potential for differentiation and the ability to self-renew. The potential for differentiation has been demonstrated by many studies, and has already been discussed in this review. Some studies showed the ability to self-renew through clonal analysis of MSCs, but the differentiation potential of these clonal cells was limited in mesodermal-lineage cells, such as osteocytes, chondrocytes, adipocytes, and muscle cells (De Bari et al. 2006; Sarugaser et al. 2009). As mentioned, MSCs behave like pluripotent cells because they can differentiate into cells of all three germ layers. Indeed, there are several reports proposing the existence of pluripotent cell subpopulations among MSCs, such as multipotent adult progenitor cells, marrow-isolated adult multilineage inducible cells, and very small embryonic-like cells (D’Ippolito et al. 2004; Kucia et al. 2006; Wojakowski et al. 2011). In all of these studies, the authors demonstrated the ability of these subpopulations to differentiate into cells of all three germ layers; however, the ability to self-renew was not demonstrated for these cells. Thus, these pluripotent cells may not be able to meet the requirements of true stem cells. As MSCs are thought to consist of heterogeneous cell populations, the possibility that MSCs are a mixture of unipotent or multipotent stem/progenitor cells that can give rise to cells of one or a few germ layers cannot be ruled out. Another possibility is that MSCs contain a specific single cell population that can behave like pluripotent stem cells, in addition to the unipotent or multipotent cells described above. In both cases, MSCs, as a whole, can produce cells of all three germ layers. In the latter case, stemness, the ability for self-renewal, and the potential to differentiate into cells of all three germ layers, for the particular single cell population in question, should be demonstrated by clonal analysis. Recently, a specific single cell population with a potential similar to pluripotent stem cells was demonstrated by clonal analysis in adult human mesenchymal cell populations, including BMSCs and dermal fibroblasts (Kuroda et al. 2010).
Tissue stem cells can be induced to proliferate and differentiate so as to contribute to tissue repair under conditions of stress, burden, or damage. Thus, we conjectured that the purification or enrichment of certain stem cell types from mesenchymal cell populations could be achieved by exposure to stress conditions. Since stem cell fractions can be grown in suspension culture, where they form cell clusters in which their stemness is maintained (Kreso and O’Brien 2008; Reynolds and Weiss 1992), and we had already observed that, at a low frequency, MSCs spontaneously grew into cell clusters that were similar to cell clusters formed by ES cells, in which pigmented cells or hair-like structures are occasionally found (Fig. 12) (Kuroda et al. 2010), we cultured human MSCs—including human BMSCs and human fibroblasts—in suspension following treatment with six different stressors. Cell clusters with diameters of up to 50–150 μm were formed from MSCs after any one of these stressors, and they were positive for alkaline phosphatase staining. Cells that primarily localized to the outer surfaces of cell clusters whose diameters were >25 μm were found to be positive for pluripotency markers, such as Nanog, Oct3/4, Sox2, PAR-4, and SSEA-3 (Fig. 12) (Kuroda et al. 2010). Long-term trypsin (LTT) treatment gave the best results in terms of inducing the formation of the cell clusters described above. When human MSCs treated with LTT were cultured in single-cell suspension conditions after limiting dilution, about 10% of the cells formed single cell-derived cell clusters. Naive human MSCs could also form single cell-derived cell clusters, and the rate of cluster formation was about 1%. These cell clusters appeared to cease cell division 7–10 days after the start of suspension culture, but cell proliferation could be re-initiated by adherent culture conditions. When the adherent cells were dissociated and cultured as a suspension, single cell-derived cell clusters formed again, and the rate of cell cluster formation was about 50% when the adherent cells were allowed to proliferate up to 3000–5000 cells. Thus, cells with the capacity to form these types of clusters were expandable by repeating the following culture cycle: LTT, suspension culture, and adherent culture, resulting in the cyclical generation of cell clusters (Fig. 12). We confirmed that at least five generations could be successfully generated by repeating this cycle. These findings suggest that these cells maintain the ability to self-renew, in terms of the capacity to form cell clusters, under single-cell suspension culture conditions.
The cell clusters obtained from the single-cell suspension cultures were plated onto gelatin-coated dishes to assess their differentiation potential. These cells spontaneously differentiated into cells positive for neurofilament (an ectodermal-lineage cell marker), α-smooth muscle actin (a mesodermal marker), α-fetoprotein (an endodermal marker), cytokeratin 7 (an endodermal marker) or desmin (a mesodermal marker), as revealed by immunocytochemistry. RT-PCR also demonstrated the expression of α-fetoprotein, GATA6 (an endodermal marker), MAP-2 (an ectodermal marker), and Nkx2.5 (a mesodermal marker). When transplanted into the testes of immunodeficient mice, these cells did not form teratomas, but integrated into the host tissue where the neurofilament-, α-fetoprotein-, or α-smooth muscle actin-expressing cells appeared. In addition, these cells were also labeled by an antibody specific for human mitochondria (Fig. 13) (Kuroda et al. 2010). This spontaneous cell differentiation was confirmed using cell clusters from both the first and third generations. These findings clearly demonstrate that cells with the ability to form cell clusters, and which express pluripotency markers, possess the ability to self-renew and the potential for differentiation into cells of all three germ layers. Because of their characteristics, these cells were named multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (Muse) cells (Kuroda et al. 2010). Muse cells express stage-specific embryonic antigen (SSEA)-3 on their cell surfaces, which facilitates their isolation. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that Muse cells from human dermal fibroblast populations were distinct from other stem cell fractions residing in the dermis, such as skin-derived precursors, neural crest-derived stem cells, melanoblasts, perivascular cells, endothelial progenitors, and adipose-derived stem cells (Nishimura et al. 2002; Murga et al. 2004; Middleton et al. 2005; Crisan et al. 2008; Nagoshi et al. 2008; Fernandes et al. 2004; Biernaskie et al. 2009; Gimble et al. 2007), and under the appropriate culture conditions, the differentiation of these cells was shown to give rise to neural cells, hepatocytes, osteocytes, and adipocytes, with an efficiency greater than 85% (Wakao et al. 2011).
The findings described above suggested the possibility that Muse cells contributed to tissue repair as a consequence of their high stress tolerance and broad differentiation potential. Muse cells have been transplanted into pre-damaged tissue, including skin lesions, cardiotoxin-injected gastrocnemius muscle, and liver with CCl4-induced injury (Kuroda et al. 2010). The Muse cells homed in on the damaged sites, integrated into the host tissue, and differentiated into tissue-specific cells, such as human cytokeratin 14-positive epidermal cells in the epidermis, human dystrophin-positive mature skeletal muscle cells and Pax7-positive satellite cells in skeletal muscle, and human albumin- or human antitrypsin-positive hepatocytes in the liver, under the control of the microenvironment of each tissue. Thus, Muse cells are considered tissue-repairing stem cells that integrate into damaged tissue and differentiate into tissue-specific cells to contribute to tissue repair when transplanted into damaged/degenerating target tissues. In addition, Muse cells are not induced cells, but can be harvested directly from the tissue, in addition to the cultured mesenchymal cell populations. Thus, there is the possibility of developing a novel therapeutic strategy in which endogenous Muse cells are targeted specifically to the damaged tissue, and their differentiation into the appropriate cell types is regulated to optimize tissue reconstruction.
Induction of neurons from MSCs—differentiation or direct reprogramming?
Recent studies have reported that introducing a defined set of transcription factors leads to cell reprogramming that induces the formation of specific cell types, including neurons, cardiomyocytes, hepatocytes, and even pluripotent stem cells (Sekiya and Suzuki 2011; Efe et al. 2011; Vierbuchen et al. 2010; Takahashi and Yamanaka 2006). Because MSCs, such as BMSCs and dermal fibroblasts, are comprised of heterogeneous cell populations (Sorrell and Caplan 2004; Rider et al. 2007; Ratajczak et al. 2004), there might be several types of stem/progenitor cell populations among MSCs that have already committed to a specific cell lineage, such as skeletal muscle stem cells (Cornelison and Wold 1997), or have the potential to differentiate into cells of two or all three germ layers, such as neural crest-derived stem cells (Nagoshi et al. 2008) or Muse cells (Kuroda et al. 2010). These cells primarily give rise to the specific cell type by a cell differentiation mechanism, not by cellular reprogramming. In fact, when adult human fibroblasts are used, Muse cells are the primary source for the induction of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells (Wakao et al. 2011). In this study, Muse cells and non-Muse cells were isolated and transfected with defined factors, such as Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc, resulting in the exclusive induction of iPS cells. Although some colonies were formed from non-Muse cells, some of the major pluripotency markers were consistently not expressed in these colonies throughout the induction process. These colonies were also negative for Abcg2, Dnmt3b, and Cdx2, corresponding to the type I colony that is in an incompletely reprogrammed state and which cannot spontaneously transform into iPS cells (Chan et al. 2009). Gene expression profiles in Muse cells, Muse cell-derived iPS cells and non-Muse cell-derived colonies, compared with non-Muse cells, suggested that the introduction of this particular set of four factors influenced the expression of cell cycle-related genes, not pluripotency markers, whereas the expression of pluripotency markers by Muse cells was up-regulated after the induction of iPS cells. These data demonstrate that adult human fibroblast-derived, pre-existing Muse cells can transform into iPS cells after the introduction of a set of four specific factors (Wakao et al. 2011).
In contrast, Vierbuchen et al. (2010) introduced several transcription factors for the induction of functional neurons. They also reported that Tuj-1-positive cells, with a monopolar or bipolar morphology, occasionally emerged after the introduction of Mash1, and that no other factor by itself, other than Mash1, could induce these types of neuron-like cells. As mentioned, recent studies have revealed that the inhibition of the Notch signaling pathway can promote the expression of neuronal genes in BMSCs, in which Mash1 might be expressed, because the expression of the NICD gene was inhibited, indicating the down-regulation of Hes1 and Hes5, the negative regulators of the Mash1 gene (Yanjie et al. 2007; Jing et al. 2011). Yanjie et al. (2007) also demonstrated that 30% of the Notch-1-shRNA-transfected cells died by apoptosis. In addition, in our neuronal induction system, the vast majority of cells died during the selection of transfected cells by G418 treatment, in which the proportion of dying cells was much greater than that of untransfected cells (our unpublished data). In this case, there is the possibility that cells with the potential to receive appropriate signaling cues, which are likely stem or progenitor cells, are the only ones selected and capable of differentiating into neurons. The same process might take place during the formation of functional neurons, as was reported by Vierbuchen et al. (2010). If so, it is likely that the induction of neurons does not depend on reprogramming, but on cell differentiation, similar to iPS cell induction from adult human fibroblasts (Wakao et al. 2011). It needs to be clarified what factors determine the ability of a cell to respond to induction signals and its ability to transform into functional neurons, such as the cell’s epigenetic state and differentiation potential, or any other unknown factors.
Conclusion
Because of their efficient expandability and versatility in repairing damaged tissue, MSCs are promising candidates for cell therapy. In addition, there are fewer ethical and safety concerns associated with MSC transplantation, similar to bone marrow transplantation. Indeed, MSCs have already been used in numerous clinical studies. However, most of these investigations focused on the trophic or immunomodulatory effects of MSCs, because the efficiency of differentiation was generally quite low. Our induction system is a practical solution for implementing the ability of MSCs to differentiate into Schwann cells and neurons so that it can be applied in cell therapy for neurodegenerative and neurotraumatic diseases. As mentioned, specific stem cell populations have been identified among MSCs, which have a broad differentiation potential, the capacity for self-renewal, and the ability to efficiently repair damaged tissues. Further basic and preclinical studies will clarify the molecular and cell biology of MSCs in much greater detail, and will ultimately lead to the clinical application of a cell therapeutic approach that harnesses the remarkable differentiation potential of these cells.
References
Abdi R, Fiorina P, Adra CN, Atkinson M, Sayegh MH (2008) Immunomodulation by mesenchymal stem cells: a potential therapeutic strategy for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 57:1759–1767
Aggarwal S, Pittenger MF (2005) Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood 105:1815–1822
Akerud P, Alberch J, Eketjall S, Wagner J, Arenas E (1999) Differential effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and neurturin on developing and adult substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons. J Neurochem 73:70–78
Aldinucci A, Rizzetto L, Pieri L et al (2010) Inhibition of immune synapse by altered dendritic cell actin distribution: a new pathway of mesenchymal stem cell immune regulation. J Immunol 185:5102–5110
Alvarez-Dolado M, Pardal R, Garcia-Verdugo JM et al (2003) Fusion of bone-marrow-derived cells with Purkinje neurons, cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes. Nature 425:968–973
Anderson PN, Campbell G, Zhang Y, Lieberman AR (1998) Cellular and molecular correlates of the regeneration of adult mammalian CNS axons into peripheral nerve grafts. Prog Brain Res 117:211–232
Asari S, Itakura S, Ferreri K et al (2009) Mesenchymal stem cells suppress B-cell terminal differentiation. Exp Hematol 37:604–615
Bai H, Suzuki Y, Noda T et al (2003) Dissemination and proliferation of neural stem cells on the spinal cord by injection into the fourth ventricle of the rat: a method for cell transplantation. J Neurosci Methods 124:181–187
Bain JR, Mackinnon SE, Hunter DA (1989) Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg 83:129–138
Bartholomew A, Sturgeon C, Siatskas M et al (2002) Mesenchymal stem cells suppress lymphocyte proliferation in vitro and prolong skin graft survival in vivo. Exp Hematol 30:42–48
Benfey M, Aguayo AJ (1982) Extensive elongation of axons from rat brain into peripheral nerve grafts. Nature 296:150–152
Biernaskie J, Paris M, Morozova O et al (2009) SKPs derive from hair follicle precursors and exhibit properties of adult dermal stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 5:610–623
Bithell A, Williams BP (2005) Neural stem cells and cell replacement therapy: making the right cells. Clin Sci (Lond) 108:13–22
Bliss T, Guzman R, Daadi M, Steinberg GK (2007) Cell transplantation therapy for stroke. Stroke 38:817–826
Bochev I, Elmadjian G, Kyurkchiev D et al (2008) Mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow or adipose tissue differently modulate mitogen-stimulated B-cell immunoglobulin production in vitro. Cell Biol Int 32:384–393
Cao Y, Sun Z, Liao L, Meng Y, Han Q, Zhao RC (2005) Human adipose tissue-derived stem cells differentiate into endothelial cells in vitro and improve postnatal neovascularization in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 332:370–379
Chabannes D, Hill M, Merieau E et al (2007) A role for heme oxygenase-1 in the immunosuppressive effect of adult rat and human mesenchymal stem cells. Blood 110:3691–3694
Chan EM, Ratanasirintrawoot S, Park IH et al (2009) Live cell imaging distinguishes bona fide human iPS cells from partially reprogrammed cells. Nat Biotechnol 27:1033–1037
Chao KC, Chao KF, Fu YS, Liu SH (2008) Islet-like clusters derived from mesenchymal stem cells in Wharton’s jelly of the human umbilical cord for transplantation to control type 1 diabetes. PLoS One 3:e1451
Chen ZL, Yu WM, Strickland S (2007) Peripheral regeneration. Annu Rev Neurosci 30:209–233
Chopp M, Li Y (2002) Treatment of neural injury with marrow stromal cells. Lancet Neurol 1:92–100
Chopp M, Zhang XH, Li Y et al (2000) Spinal cord injury in rat: treatment with bone marrow stromal cell transplantation. Neuroreport 11:3001–3005
Chopp M, Li Y, Zhang J (2008) Plasticity and remodeling of brain. J Neurol Sci 265:97–101
Chu K, Kim M, Park KI et al (2004) Human neural stem cells improve sensorimotor deficits in the adult rat brain with experimental focal ischemia. Brain Res 1016:145–153
Corcione A, Benvenuto F, Ferretti E et al (2006) Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate B-cell functions. Blood 107:367–372
Cornelison DD, Wold BJ (1997) Single-cell analysis of regulatory gene expression in quiescent and activated mouse skeletal muscle satellite cells. Dev Biol 191:270–283
Crigler L, Robey RC, Asawachaicharn A, Gaupp D, Phinney DG (2006) Human mesenchymal stem cell subpopulations express a variety of neuro-regulatory molecules and promote neuronal cell survival and neuritogenesis. Exp Neurol 198:54–64
Crisan M, Yap S, Casteilla L et al (2008) A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs. Cell Stem Cell 3:301–313
Curtis L, Lees AJ, Stern GM, Marmot MG (1984) Effect of l-dopa on course of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 2:211–212
Dai W, Hale SL, Martin BJ et al (2005) Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in postinfarcted rat myocardium: short- and long-term effects. Circulation 112:214–223
David S, Aguayo AJ (1981) Axonal elongation into peripheral nervous system “bridges” after central nervous system injury in adult rats. Science 214:931–933
De Bari C, Dell’Accio F, Vanlauwe J et al (2006) Mesenchymal multipotency of adult human periosteal cells demonstrated by single-cell lineage analysis. Arthritis Rheum 54:1209–1221
Dezawa M, Takahashi I, Esaki M, Takano M, Sawada H (2001) Sciatic nerve regeneration in rats induced by transplantation of in vitro differentiated bone-marrow stromal cells. Eur J Neurosci 14:1771–1776
Dezawa M, Kanno H, Hoshino M et al (2004) Specific induction of neuronal cells from bone marrow stromal cells and application for autologous transplantation. J Clin Invest 113:1701–1710
Dezawa M, Ishikawa H, Itokazu Y et al (2005) Bone marrow stromal cells generate muscle cells and repair muscle degeneration. Science 309:314–317
Di Nicola M, Carlo-Stella C, Magni M et al (2002) Human bone marrow stromal cells suppress T-lymphocyte proliferation induced by cellular or nonspecific mitogenic stimuli. Blood 99:3838–3843
Di Rocco G, Iachininoto MG, Tritarelli A et al (2006) Myogenic potential of adipose-tissue-derived cells. J Cell Sci 119:2945–2952
D’Ippolito G, Diabira S, Howard GA, Menei P, Roos BA, Schiller PC (2004) Marrow-isolated adult multilineage inducible (MIAMI) cells, a unique population of postnatal young and old human cells with extensive expansion and differentiation potential. J Cell Sci 117:2971–2981
Dubovy P (2004) Schwann cells and endoneurial extracellular matrix molecules as potential cues for sorting of regenerated axons: a review. Anat Sci Int 79:198–208
Efe JA, Hilcove S, Kim J et al (2011) Conversion of mouse fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes using a direct reprogramming strategy. Nat Cell Biol 13:215–222
Eliopoulos N, Stagg J, Lejeune L, Pommey S, Galipeau J (2005) Allogeneic marrow stromal cells are immune rejected by MHC class I- and class II-mismatched recipient mice. Blood 106:4057–4065
English K, Barry FP, Mahon BP (2008) Murine mesenchymal stem cells suppress dendritic cell migration, maturation and antigen presentation. Immunol Lett 115:50–58
Faroni A, Mantovani C, Shawcross SG, Motta M, Terenghi G, Magnaghi V (2011) Schwann-like adult stem cells derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue express gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptors. J Neurosci Res 89:1351–1362
Fernandes KJ, McKenzie IA, Mill P et al (2004) A dermal niche for multipotent adult skin-derived precursor cells. Nat Cell Biol 6:1082–1093
Ferrari G, Cusella-De Angelis G, Coletta M et al (1998) Muscle regeneration by bone marrow-derived myogenic progenitors. Science 279:1528–1530
Fibbe WE, Nauta AJ, Roelofs H (2007) Modulation of immune responses by mesenchymal stem cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1106:272–278
Freed CR, Breeze RE, Rosenberg NL et al (1992) Survival of implanted fetal dopamine cells and neurologic improvement 12 to 46 months after transplantation for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 327:1549–1555
Gang EJ, Jeong JA, Hong SH et al (2004) Skeletal myogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from human umbilical cord blood. Stem Cells 22:617–624
Gang EJ, Jeong JA, Han S, Yan Q, Jeon CJ, Kim H (2006) In vitro endothelial potential of human UC blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cytotherapy 8:215–227
Geuna S, Fornaro M, Raimondo S, Giacobini-Robecchi MG (2010) Plasticity and regeneration in the peripheral nervous system. Ital J Anat Embryol 115:91–94
Gimble JM, Katz AJ, Bunnell BA (2007) Adipose-derived stem cells for regenerative medicine. Circ Res 100:1249–1260
Hare GM, Evans PJ, Mackinnon SE et al (1992) Walking track analysis: a long-term assessment of peripheral nerve recovery. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:251–258
Harris RG, Herzog EL, Bruscia EM, Grove JE, Van Arnam JS, Krause DS (2004) Lack of a fusion requirement for development of bone marrow-derived epithelia. Science 305:90–93
Harvey AR, Plant GW, Tan MM (1995) Schwann cells and the regrowth of axons in the mammalian CNS: a review of transplantation studies in the rat visual system. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 22:569–579
Hayase M, Kitada M, Wakao S et al (2009) Committed neural progenitor cells derived from genetically modified bone marrow stromal cells ameliorate deficits in a rat model of stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 29:1409–1420
Hida N, Nishiyama N, Miyoshi S et al (2008) Novel cardiac precursor-like cells from human menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal cells. Stem Cells 26:1695–1704
Huang Y, Chen P, Zhang CB et al (2010) Kidney-derived mesenchymal stromal cells modulate dendritic cell function to suppress alloimmune responses and delay allograft rejection. Transplantation 90:1307–1311
Ide C (1996) Peripheral nerve regeneration. Neurosci Res 25:101–121
Ide C, Nakai Y, Nakano N et al (2010) Bone marrow stromal cell transplantation for treatment of sub-acute spinal cord injury in the rat. Brain Res 1332:32–47
Iguchi F, Nakagawa T, Tateya I et al (2003) Trophic support of mouse inner ear by neural stem cell transplantation. Neuroreport 14:77–80
Jiang L, Zhu JK, Liu XL, Xiang P, Hu J, Yu WH (2008) Differentiation of rat adipose tissue-derived stem cells into Schwann-like cells in vitro. Neuroreport 19:1015–1019
Jing L, Jia Y, Lu J et al (2011) MicroRNA-9 promotes differentiation of mouse bone mesenchymal stem cells into neurons by Notch signaling. Neuroreport 22:206–211
Kadivar M, Khatami S, Mortazavi Y, Shokrgozar MA, Taghikhani M, Soleimani M (2006) In vitro cardiomyogenic potential of human umbilical vein-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 340:639–647
Kaewkhaw R, Scutt AM, Haycock JW (2011) Anatomical site influences the differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells for Schwann-cell phenotype and function. Glia 59:734–749
Kajstura J, Rota M, Whang B et al (2005) Bone marrow cells differentiate in cardiac cell lineages after infarction independently of cell fusion. Circ Res 96:127–137
Kamada T, Koda M, Dezawa M et al (2005) Transplantation of bone marrow stromal cell-derived Schwann cells promotes axonal regeneration and functional recovery after complete transection of adult rat spinal cord. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 64:37–45
Kamada T, Koda M, Dezawa M et al (2010) Transplantation of human bone marrow stromal cell-derived Schwann cells reduces cystic cavity and promotes functional recovery after contusion injury of adult rat spinal cord. Neuropathology 31:48–58
Kim BJ, Seo JH, Bubien JK, Oh YS (2002) Differentiation of adult bone marrow stem cells into neuroprogenitor cells in vitro. Neuroreport 13:1185–1188
Kim JW, Kim SY, Park SY et al (2004) Mesenchymal progenitor cells in the human umbilical cord. Ann Hematol 83:733–738
Kingham PJ, Kalbermatten DF, Mahay D, Armstrong SJ, Wiberg M, Terenghi G (2007) Adipose-derived stem cells differentiate into a Schwann cell phenotype and promote neurite outgrowth in vitro. Exp Neurol 207:267–274
Kitada M, Dezawa M (2009) Induction system of neural and muscle lineage cells from bone marrow stromal cells; a new strategy for tissue reconstruction in degenerative diseases. Histol Histopathol 24:631–642
Kordower JH, Freeman TB, Snow BJ et al (1995) Neuropathological evidence of graft survival and striatal reinnervation after the transplantation of fetal mesencephalic tissue in a patient with Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 332:1118–1124
Krampera M, Glennie S, Dyson J et al (2003) Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibit the response of naive and memory antigen-specific T cells to their cognate peptide. Blood 101:3722–3729
Kreso A, O’Brien CA (2008) Colon cancer stem cells. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol 7:3.1.1–3.1.12
Kromer LF, Cornbrooks CJ (1987) Identification of trophic factors and transplanted cellular environments that promote CNS axonal regeneration. Ann N Y Acad Sci 495:207–224
Kronsteiner B, Peterbauer-Scherb A, Grillari-Voglauer R et al (2011) Human mesenchymal stem cells and renal tubular epithelial cells differentially influence monocyte-derived dendritic cell differentiation and maturation. Cell Immunol 267:30–38
Kucia M, Reca R, Campbell FR et al (2006) A population of very small embryonic-like (VSEL) CXCR4(+)SSEA-1(+)Oct-4+ stem cells identified in adult bone marrow. Leukemia 20:857–869
Kuroda Y, Kitada M, Wakao S et al (2010) Unique multipotent cells in adult human mesenchymal cell populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:8639–8643
Le Blanc K, Tammik L, Sundberg B, Haynesworth SE, Ringden O (2003) Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit and stimulate mixed lymphocyte cultures and mitogenic responses independently of the major histocompatibility complex. Scand J Immunol 57:11–20
Liechty KW, MacKenzie TC, Shaaban AF et al (2000) Human mesenchymal stem cells engraft and demonstrate site-specific differentiation after in utero transplantation in sheep. Nat Med 6:1282–1286
Lin LF, Doherty DH, Lile JD, Bektesh S, Collins F (1993) GDNF: a glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor for midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Science 260:1130–1132
Lindvall O, Kokaia Z (2006) Stem cells for the treatment of neurological disorders. Nature 441:1094–1096
Lindvall O, Sawle G, Widner H et al (1994) Evidence for long-term survival and function of dopaminergic grafts in progressive Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 35:172–180
Lu P, Blesch A, Tuszynski MH (2004) Induction of bone marrow stromal cells to neurons: differentiation, transdifferentiation, or artifact? J Neurosci Res 77:174–191
Lundkvist J, Lendahl U (2001) Notch and the birth of glial cells. Trends Neurosci 24:492–494
Magatti M, De Munari S, Vertua E et al (2009) Amniotic mesenchymal tissue cells inhibit dendritic cell differentiation of peripheral blood and amnion resident monocytes. Cell Transpl 18:899–914
Mahmood A, Lu D, Chopp M (2004) Intravenous administration of marrow stromal cells (MSCs) increases the expression of growth factors in rat brain after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 21:33–39
Makino S, Fukuda K, Miyoshi S et al (1999) Cardiomyocytes can be generated from marrow stromal cells in vitro. J Clin Invest 103:697–705
Masaki I, Yonemitsu Y, Yamashita A et al (2002) Angiogenic gene therapy for experimental critical limb ischemia: acceleration of limb loss by overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor 165 but not of fibroblast growth factor-2. Circ Res 90:966–973
Matsuse D, Kitada M, Kohama M et al (2010) Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells differentiate into functional Schwann cells that sustain peripheral nerve regeneration. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 69:973–985
Matsuse D, Kitada M, Ogura F et al (2011) Combined transplantation of bone marrow stromal cell-derived neural progenitor cells with a collagen sponge and basic fibroblast growth factor releasing microspheres enhances recovery after cerebral ischemia in rats. Tissue Eng Part A 17:1993–2004
Meisel R, Zibert A, Laryea M, Gobel U, Daubener W, Dilloo D (2004) Human bone marrow stromal cells inhibit allogeneic T-cell responses by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-mediated tryptophan degradation. Blood 103:4619–4621
Mezey E, Chandross KJ, Harta G, Maki RA, McKercher SR (2000) Turning blood into brain: cells bearing neuronal antigens generated in vivo from bone marrow. Science 290:1779–1782
Middleton J, Americh L, Gayon R et al (2005) A comparative study of endothelial cell markers expressed in chronically inflamed human tissues: MECA-79, Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines, von Willebrand factor, CD31, CD34, CD105 and CD146. J Pathol 206:260–268
Mimura T, Dezawa M, Kanno H, Yamamoto I (2005) Behavioral and histological evaluation of a focal cerebral infarction rat model transplanted with neurons induced from bone marrow stromal cells. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 64:1108–1117
Mitchell KE, Weiss ML, Mitchell BM et al (2003) Matrix cells from Wharton’s jelly form neurons and glia. Stem Cells 21:50–60
Mizuno H, Zuk PA, Zhu M, Lorenz HP, Benhaim P, Hedrick MH (2002) Myogenic differentiation by human processed lipoaspirate cells. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:199–209 (discussion 210-191)
Morrison SJ, Perez SE, Qiao Z et al (2000) Transient Notch activation initiates an irreversible switch from neurogenesis to gliogenesis by neural crest stem cells. Cell 101:499–510
Murga M, Yao L, Tosato G (2004) Derivation of endothelial cells from CD34-umbilical cord blood. Stem Cells 22:385–395
Musina RA, Belyavski AV, Tarusova OV, Solovyova EV, Sukhikh GT (2008) Endometrial mesenchymal stem cells isolated from the menstrual blood. Bull Exp Biol Med 145:539–543
Nagane K, Kitada M, Wakao S, Dezawa M, Tabata Y (2009) Practical induction system for dopamine-producing cells from bone marrow stromal cells using spermine–pullulan-mediated reverse transfection method. Tissue Eng Part A 15:1655–1665
Nagao M, Sugimori M, Nakafuku M (2007) Cross talk between notch and growth factor/cytokine signaling pathways in neural stem cells. Mol Cell Biol 27:3982–3994
Nagoshi N, Shibata S, Kubota Y et al (2008) Ontogeny and multipotency of neural crest-derived stem cells in mouse bone marrow, dorsal root ganglia, and whisker pad. Cell Stem Cell 2:392–403
Nakamura Y, Wang X, Xu C et al (2007) Xenotransplantation of long-term-cultured swine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 25:612–620
Nakano N, Nakai Y, Seo TB et al (2010) Characterization of conditioned medium of cultured bone marrow stromal cells. Neurosci Lett 483:57–61
Nauta AJ, Westerhuis G, Kruisselbrink AB, Lurvink EG, Willemze R, Fibbe WE (2006) Donor-derived mesenchymal stem cells are immunogenic in an allogeneic host and stimulate donor graft rejection in a nonmyeloablative setting. Blood 108:2114–2120
Neuhuber B, Gallo G, Howard L, Kostura L, Mackay A, Fischer I (2004) Reevaluation of in vitro differentiation protocols for bone marrow stromal cells: disruption of actin cytoskeleton induces rapid morphological changes and mimics neuronal phenotype. J Neurosci Res 77:192–204
Niemeyer P, Krause U, Kasten P et al (2006) Mesenchymal stem cell-based HLA-independent cell therapy for tissue engineering of bone and cartilage. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 1:21–27
Nishimura EK, Jordan SA, Oshima H et al (2002) Dominant role of the niche in melanocyte stem-cell fate determination. Nature 416:854–860
Ohta M, Suzuki Y, Noda T et al (2004a) Bone marrow stromal cells infused into the cerebrospinal fluid promote functional recovery of the injured rat spinal cord with reduced cavity formation. Exp Neurol 187:266–278
Ohta M, Suzuki Y, Noda T et al (2004b) Implantation of neural stem cells via cerebrospinal fluid into the injured root. Neuroreport 15:1249–1253
Oswald J, Boxberger S, Jorgensen B et al (2004) Mesenchymal stem cells can be differentiated into endothelial cells in vitro. Stem Cells 22:377–384
Oyagi S, Hirose M, Kojima M et al (2006) Therapeutic effect of transplanting HGF-treated bone marrow mesenchymal cells into CCl4-injured rats. J Hepatol 44:742–748
Pang ZP, Yang N, Vierbuchen T et al (2011) Induction of human neuronal cells by defined transcription factors. Nature 476:220–223
Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC et al (1999) Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284:143–147
Pittenger MF, Mosca JD, McIntosh KR (2000) Human mesenchymal stem cells: progenitor cells for cartilage, bone, fat and stroma. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 251:3–11
Pournasr B, Mohamadnejad M, Bagheri M et al (2011) In vitro differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into hepatocyte-like cells. Arch Iran Med 14:244–249
Prindull G, Zipori D (2004) Environmental guidance of normal and tumor cell plasticity: epithelial mesenchymal transitions as a paradigm. Blood 103:2892–2899
Prockop DJ (1997) Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues. Science 276:71–74
Qian Q, Qian H, Zhang X et al (2011) 5-Azacytidine induces cardiac differentiation of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells by activating extracellular regulated kinase. Stem Cells Dev [Epub ahead of print]
Qu R, Li Y, Gao Q et al (2007) Neurotrophic and growth factor gene expression profiling of mouse bone marrow stromal cells induced by ischemic brain extracts. Neuropathology 27:355–363
Qu C, Mahmood A, Lu D, Goussev A, Xiong Y, Chopp M (2008) Treatment of traumatic brain injury in mice with marrow stromal cells. Brain Res 1208:234–239
Raisman G (1997) Use of Schwann cells to induce repair of adult CNS tracts. Rev Neurol (Paris) 153:521–525
Ramasamy R, Fazekasova H, Lam EW, Soeiro I, Lombardi G, Dazzi F (2007) Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit dendritic cell differentiation and function by preventing entry into the cell cycle. Transplantation 83:71–76
Ramón y Cajal S (1928) Degeneration and regeneration of the nervous system. Haffner, New York
Rangappa S, Fen C, Lee EH, Bongso A, Sim EK (2003) Transformation of adult mesenchymal stem cells isolated from the fatty tissue into cardiomyocytes. Ann Thorac Surg 75:775–779
Rasmusson I, Ringden O, Sundberg B, Le Blanc K (2003) Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit the formation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, but not activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes or natural killer cells. Transplantation 76:1208–1213
Ratajczak MZ, Kucia M, Majka M, Reca R, Ratajczak J (2004) Heterogeneous populations of bone marrow stem cells—are we spotting on the same cells from the different angles? Folia Histochem Cytobiol 42:139–146
Reubinoff BE, Itsykson P, Turetsky T et al (2001) Neural progenitors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 19:1134–1140
Reynolds BA, Weiss S (1992) Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 255:1707–1710
Rider DA, Nalathamby T, Nurcombe V, Cool SM (2007) Selection using the alpha-1 integrin (CD49a) enhances the multipotentiality of the mesenchymal stem cell population from heterogeneous bone marrow stromal cells. J Mol Histol 38:449–458
Romanov YA, Svintsitskaya VA, Smirnov VN (2003) Searching for alternative sources of postnatal human mesenchymal stem cells: candidate MSC-like cells from umbilical cord. Stem Cells 21:105–110
Ryan JM, Barry FP, Murphy JM, Mahon BP (2005) Mesenchymal stem cells avoid allogeneic rejection. J Inflamm (Lond) 2:8
Safford KM, Hicok KC, Safford SD et al (2002) Neurogenic differentiation of murine and human adipose-derived stromal cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 294:371–379
Saito F, Nakatani T, Iwase M et al (2008) Spinal cord injury treatment with intrathecal autologous bone marrow stromal cell transplantation: the first clinical trial case report. J Trauma 64:53–59
Sakurada K, Ohshima-Sakurada M, Palmer TD, Gage FH (1999) Nurr1, an orphan nuclear receptor, is a transcriptional activator of endogenous tyrosine hydroxylase in neural progenitor cells derived from the adult brain. Development 126:4017–4026
Sanchez-Ramos J, Song S, Cardozo-Pelaez F et al (2000) Adult bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neural cells in vitro. Exp Neurol 164:247–256
Sarugaser R, Hanoun L, Keating A, Stanford WL, Davies JE (2009) Human mesenchymal stem cells self-renew and differentiate according to a deterministic hierarchy. PLoS One 4:e6498
Sato K, Ozaki K, Oh I et al (2007) Nitric oxide plays a critical role in suppression of T-cell proliferation by mesenchymal stem cells. Blood 109:228–234
Schena F, Gambini C, Gregorio A et al (2010) Interferon-gamma-dependent inhibition of B cell activation by bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a murine model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 62:2776–2786
Sekiya S, Suzuki A (2011) Direct conversion of mouse fibroblasts to hepatocyte-like cells by defined factors. Nature 475:390–393
Seko A, Nitta N, Sonoda A et al (2009) Vascular regeneration by repeated infusions of basic fibroblast growth factor in a rabbit model of hind-limb ischemia. Am J Roentgenol 192:W306–W310
Shimizu S, Kitada M, Ishikawa H, Itokazu Y, Wakao S, Dezawa M (2007) Peripheral nerve regeneration by the in vitro differentiated-human bone marrow stromal cells with Schwann cell property. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 359:915–920
Snykers S, De Kock J, Rogiers V, Vanhaecke T (2009) In vitro differentiation of embryonic and adult stem cells into hepatocytes: state of the art. Stem Cells 27:577–605
Someya Y, Koda M, Dezawa M et al (2008) Reduction of cystic cavity, promotion of axonal regeneration and sparing, and functional recovery with transplanted bone marrow stromal cell-derived Schwann cells after contusion injury to the adult rat spinal cord. J Neurosurg Spine 9:600–610
Sorrell JM, Caplan AI (2004) Fibroblast heterogeneity: more than skin deep. J Cell Sci 117:667–675
Spaggiari GM, Capobianco A, Becchetti S, Mingari MC, Moretta L (2006) Mesenchymal stem cell-natural killer cell interactions: evidence that activated NK cells are capable of killing MSCs, whereas MSCs can inhibit IL-2-induced NK-cell proliferation. Blood 107:1484–1490
Stromberg I, Bjorklund L, Johansson M et al (1993) Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor is expressed in the developing but not adult striatum and stimulates developing dopamine neurons in vivo. Exp Neurol 124:401–412
Tabera S, Perez-Simon JA, Diez-Campelo M et al (2008) The effect of mesenchymal stem cells on the viability, proliferation and differentiation of B-lymphocytes. Haematologica 93:1301–1309
Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663–676
Tang DQ, Cao LZ, Burkhardt BR et al (2004) In vivo and in vitro characterization of insulin-producing cells obtained from murine bone marrow. Diabetes 53:1721–1732
Terada N, Hamazaki T, Oka M et al (2002) Bone marrow cells adopt the phenotype of other cells by spontaneous cell fusion. Nature 416:542–545
Teramachi M, Nakamura T, Yamamoto Y, Kiyotani T, Takimoto Y, Shimizu Y (1997) Porous-type tracheal prosthesis sealed with collagen sponge. Ann Thorac Surg 64:965–969
Thomas ED (2000) Landmarks in the development of hematopoietic cell transplantation. World J Surg 24:815–818
Timper K, Seboek D, Eberhardt M et al (2006) Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into insulin, somatostatin, and glucagon expressing cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 341:1135–1140
Tse WT, Pendleton JD, Beyer WM, Egalka MC, Guinan EC (2003) Suppression of allogeneic T-cell proliferation by human marrow stromal cells: implications in transplantation. Transplantation 75:389–397
Tyndall A, Walker UA, Cope A et al (2007) Immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stem cells: a review based on an interdisciplinary meeting held at the Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology Division, London, UK, 31 October 2005. Arthritis Res Ther 9:301
Uccelli A, Moretta L, Pistoia V (2006) Immunoregulatory function of mesenchymal stem cells. Eur J Immunol 36:2566–2573
Varejao AS, Meek MF, Ferreira AJ, Patricio JA, Cabrita AM (2001) Functional evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration in the rat: walking track analysis. J Neurosci Methods 108:1–9
Vierbuchen T, Ostermeier A, Pang ZP, Kokubu Y, Sudhof TC, Wernig M (2010) Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors. Nature 463:1035–1041
Wakao S, Hayashi T, Kitada M et al (2010) Long-term observation of auto-cell transplantation in non-human primate reveals safety and efficiency of bone marrow stromal cell-derived Schwann cells in peripheral nerve regeneration. Exp Neurol 223:537–547
Wakao S, Kitada M, Kuroda Y et al (2011) Multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (Muse) cells are a primary source of induced pluripotent stem cells in human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:9875–9880
Wakitani S, Saito T, Caplan AI (1995) Myogenic cells derived from rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells exposed to 5-azacytidine. Muscle Nerve 18:1417–1426
Wang HS, Hung SC, Peng ST et al (2004) Mesenchymal stem cells in the Wharton’s jelly of the human umbilical cord. Stem Cells 22:1330–1337
Wechsler LR, Kondziolka D (2003) Cell therapy: replacement. Stroke 34:2081–2082
Wei A, Tao H, Chung SA, Brisby H, Ma DD, Diwan AD (2009) The fate of transplanted xenogeneic bone marrow-derived stem cells in rat intervertebral discs. J Orthop Res 27:374–379
Wojakowski W, Kucia M, Zuba-Surma E et al (2011) Very small embryonic-like stem cells in cardiovascular repair. Pharmacol Ther 129:21–28
Woodbury D, Schwarz EJ, Prockop DJ, Black IB (2000) Adult rat and human bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neurons. J Neurosci Res 61:364–370
Wu S, Suzuki Y, Kitada M et al (2002a) New method for transplantation of neurosphere cells into injured spinal cord through cerebrospinal fluid in rat. Neurosci Lett 318:81–84
Wu S, Suzuki Y, Noda T et al (2002b) Immunohistochemical and electron microscopic study of invasion and differentiation in spinal cord lesion of neural stem cells grafted through cerebrospinal fluid in rat. J Neurosci Res 69:940–945
Wu S, Suzuki Y, Ejiri Y et al (2003) Bone marrow stromal cells enhance differentiation of cocultured neurosphere cells and promote regeneration of injured spinal cord. J Neurosci Res 72:343–351
Yan X, Lv A, Xing Y et al (2011) Inhibition of p53-p21 pathway promotes the differentiation of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into cardiomyocytes. Mol Cell Biochem 354:21–28
Yanjie J, Jiping S, Yan Z, Xiaofeng Z, Boai Z, Yajun L (2007) Effects of Notch-1 signalling pathway on differentiation of marrow mesenchymal stem cells into neurons in vitro. Neuroreport 18:1443–1447
Yoshihara T, Ohta M, Itokazu Y et al (2007) Neuroprotective effect of bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells promoting functional recovery from spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 24:1026–1036
Zappia E, Casazza S, Pedemonte E et al (2005) Mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis inducing T-cell anergy. Blood 106:1755–1761
Zhang J, Li Y, Chen J et al (2005) Human bone marrow stromal cell treatment improves neurological functional recovery in EAE mice. Exp Neurol 195:16–26
Zhang J, Li Y, Lu M et al (2006) Bone marrow stromal cells reduce axonal loss in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mice. J Neurosci Res 84:587–595
Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H et al (2001) Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng 7:211–228
Zuk PA, Zhu M, Ashjian P et al (2002) Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells. Mol Biol Cell 13:4279–4295
Acknowledgments
The author is extremely grateful to Prof. Mari Dezawa of Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine for her continued support and encouragement. This work is dedicated to all the collaborators whose works are cited in this review article. The author also thanks the lab members in the Department of Stem Cell Biology and Histology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, for their valuable discussion and collaboration, as well as for technical and clerical assistance. I would also like to express my gratitude to my beloved parents, wife, and children for their endearing support.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest in this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kitada, M. Mesenchymal cell populations: development of the induction systems for Schwann cells and neuronal cells and finding the unique stem cell population. Anat Sci Int 87, 24–44 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-011-0128-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-011-0128-4