Abstract
Coscinopleurid cheilostome bryozoans are widespread in Latest Cretaceous sediments throughout the whole Boreal Chalk Sea. Despite having many polymorphs that can readily be distinguished, intraspecific plasticity is high and polymorph morphology shows only little variation over time. This significantly hampers taxon differentiation in coscinopleurids. In this study, we revise type material of three coscinopleurid species, Acoscinopleura foliacea (Voigt, 1930), A. fallax Voigt, 1956 and A. rugica Voigt, 1956, from the Maastrichtian of northern Germany using combined scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microtomography. The three species are morphologically very similar and were distinguished by the original author only in the shape and position of peripheral caverns inside their cryptocyst and in the position of vibracular polymorphs. X-ray microtomography allowed study of the internal morphology of the species and provided additional parameters that can be used for species differentiation. Septula, arch-like and channel-like cavities and microcavities could be identified inside the calcified walls. While the original identity of the type material of A. foliacea and A. rugica remains unchanged, the type material of A. fallax is shown to belong to three different species: A. fallax, A. occulta sp. nov. and A. dualis sp. nov. Additionally, hitherto-unstudied material from the late Campanian and Maastrichtian of northern Germany and Belarus is described as A. crassa sp. nov. and A. albaruthenica sp. nov.
Kurzfassung
Coscinopleuride cheilostome Bryozoen haben eine große Verbreitung in oberkretazischen Sedimenten des gesamten borealen Schreibkreide-Meeres. Obwohl sie zahlreiche Polymorphe haben, die sich leicht unterscheiden lassen, ist die intraspezifische Plastizität groß und die morphologische Variation der Polymorphe im Laufe der Zeit nur gering. Dies beeinträchtigt die Artunterscheidung innerhalb der Coscinopleuriden deutlich. In unserer Studie wird das Typusmaterial dreier coscinopleuriden Arten aus dem Maastrichtium Norddeutschlands—Acoscinopleura foliacea (Voigt, 1930), A. fallax Voigt, 1956 und A. rugica Voigt, 1956—anhand von Rasterelektronenmikroskopie und Mikro-Computertomographie untersucht. Diese drei Arten sind morphologisch sehr ähnlich und wurden vom Erstbeschreiber nur anhand der Form und Lage peripherer Kavernen innerhalb der Kryptozyste und der Lage von vibrakularen Polymorphen unterschieden. Mikro-Computertomographische Untersuchungen geben Einblicke in die innere Morphologie der Arten und ermöglichen außerdem die Bestimmung weiterer Parameter, die für die Artunterscheidung verwendet werden können. Septula, schlitzförmige Höhlen, kanalartige Hohlräume und Mikrokavitäten konnten in den kalzifizierten Wänden identifiziert werden. Während die ursprüngliche Identität von A. foliacea und A. rugica unangetastet bleibt, wird das Typusmaterial von A. fallax in drei verschiedene Arten aufgeteilt; A. fallax, A. occulta sp. nov. und A. dualis sp. nov. Zusätzliches, bisher unbeschriebenes, Material aus dem Obercampanium und Maastrichtium von Norddeutschland und Weißrussland wird als A. crassa sp. nov. und A. albaruthenica sp. nov. beschrieben.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Coscinopleuridae Canu, 1913 is a family of cheilostome bryozoans that were locally abundant in sediments from the Santonian to Thanetian. Coscinopleurid cheilostomes have erect, bifoliate colonies, and autozooids strongly resemble those of Onychocellidae Jullien, 1882. However, the opesia is never terminal in coscinopleurid species and always shows short opesiular indentations. Furthermore, the vibracular polymorphs found in Coscinopleuridae are unique in morphology among cheilostomes. Another distinctive feature is that many coscinopleurid species have hollows or grooves in their cryptocysts. These ‘peripheral caverns’ sensu Voigt (1956), the occurrence of which is usually very irregular, are found outside Coscinopleuridae in only a few onychocellid species from the Late Cretaceous and have no analogy in Recent cheilostomes. The function and causes of formation of peripheral caverns have not yet been understood (Voigt 1956; Voigt 1985; Taylor and McKinney 2006).
For our study, we investigated the type material of three species of Acoscinopleura Voigt, 1956 from Western and Central Europe first described in Voigt (1956): A. foliacea (Voigt, 1930), A. fallax Voigt, 1956 and A. rugica Voigt, 1956, and compared it with new material from Eastern Europe. The three species are morphologically very similar and were discriminated by Voigt (1956) mainly because of the presence or absence of peripheral caverns and their shape. Acoscinopleura is found in the Latest Cretaceous of the Boreal Chalk Sea (e.g. Voigt 1956; Maryańska 1969; Georgala and Brood 1974; Favorskaya 1992) that extended in Late Cretaceous times from Western Europe to Central Asia. Our examinations included traditional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray microtomography (micro-CT), which is a well-established non-destructive method to study internal structures. For fossil bryozoan material, Viskova and Pakhnevich (2010) first applied micro-CT on a ctenostome bryozoan from the Middle Jurassic of western Russia, while Fedorov et al. (2017) used micro-CT to visualise the internal structures of esthonioporate bryozoans from the earliest Floian (Early Ordovician) of northwestern Russia. Micro-CT on fossil bryozoans from the Late Cretaceous was first applied by Koromyslova and Pakhnevich (2016) on cheilostome bryozoans from the late Campanian of Belarus and by Martha et al. (in press) on a cyclostome species from the middle Santonian of the Subhercynian Cretaceous Basin in Germany. The material of Acoscinopleura studied herein proved suitable for micro-CT analyses since the preservation of the colonies was very good with hardly any sediment infillings in the bryozoan chambers. Internal structures could be visualised, and thus information on the internal morphology of the acoscinopleurid species was obtained. In addition to the zooid chambers and septula, some new characters were visualised that have not previously been described from any other bryozoan species. This includes cavities inside the lateral and transverse walls, described here as lateral and transverse channel-like cavities, respectively, and cavities encircling the distal septula, described here as arch-like cavities.
The aims of this study are (1) to revise the family Coscinopleuridae Canu, 1913 and the genus Acoscinopleura Voigt, 1956; (2) to redescribe the species A. foliacea, A. fallax and A. rugica and four new species of Acoscinopleura using combined micro-CT and SEM results; and (3) to discuss the internal morphology of examined species.
Geological setting
Acoscinopleura is one of the commonest cheilostome genera found in Campanian to Maastrichtian deposits of the Boreal Chalk Sea from Western Europe and Central Asia. The material examined in this study is from several outcrops in northern Germany, Poland and western Belarus (Fig. 1). A comprehensive overview of the bryozoan-rich fossil sites in Western and Northern Europe, including most of the outcrops with material for this study, has been provided by Voigt (1979a).
The White Chalk cliffs on the northeastern coast of the Island of Rügen are one of the world’s best studied exposures of White Chalk and the type locality for many different species (Reich and Frenzel 2002 and references therein). The chalk cliffs expose a section from the early Maastrichtian (Belemnella obtusa to B. fastigata belemnite zones). Bryozoan research on Rügen includes the famous works of von Hagenow (1839) and Marsson (1887). At least 275 species of early Maastrichtian Rügen bryozoans have been described (see fauna list in Reich and Frenzel 2002).
At Hemmoor, bryozoans were found in the White Chalk deposits of an abandoned chalk pit of a former brick factory (e.g. Christensen et al. 2004; Niebuhr et al. 2007) and in a smaller chalk pit near Hemmoor-Basbeck (Voigt 1979a). The White Chalk section at Hemmoor ranges from the upper parts of the early Maastrichtian to the late Maastrichtian (Belemnella sumensis to Belemnitella baltica/danica belemnite zones) and comprises the upper part of the northern German standard section of Lägerdorf–Kronsmoor–Hemmoor (e.g. Niebuhr et al. 2007). Although it is one of the best studied sites from the Late Cretaceous of Germany and bryozoans are numerous, no overview of the bryozoan fauna from Hemmoor has been given.
The material examined from Eastern Europe is from Stara Kornica in eastern Poland, where there is an outcrop section of the latest Campanian to early Maastrichtian (Alexandrowicz 1965) and from material of an erratic block in a chalk pit of the Integrated Building Material Plant near Hrodna/Grodno (гpoднa/гpoднo), Belarus. The age of the erratic block was determined to be late Campanian based on findings of Belemnitella mucronata (Barskov and Weiss 1987).
Materials and methods
For this study, we investigated material of Acoscinopleura from two collections. Material from the Maastrichtian of northern Germany is part of the Voigt Collection housed at the Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung (SGN), Frankfurt am Main, Germany and was collected by Ehrhard Voigt in the middle of the 20th century, while material from western Belarus is stored at the Borissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences (PIN), Moscow, Russian Federation and was collected in the 1980s by A.F. Weiss. Material from the Voigt Collection includes type material of three species that were first imaged and described in Voigt (1956).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of material stored at the PIN and in part of material stored at the SGN were produced on uncoated samples using the backscattered electron detector of a Tescan Vega XMU equipped with a low-vacuum chamber (10 Pa), while most specimens from the Voigt Collection were coated in gold/palladium (20/80) and imaged at the SGN using a Camscan CS 24 SEM producing secondary-electron images.
X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) was carried out at the PIN on selected samples showing excellent preservation of internal features using an X-ray SkyScan 1172. An Al filter (1 mm) was used. The voltage was at 100 kV, while the current was at 100 mA. For each sample, 520 virtual sections in three directions (transverse: parallel to the transverse walls of the zooids; coronal: parallel to the frontal and basal walls of the zooids; and sagittal: parallel to the lateral walls of the zooids) were produced at a rotation of 180°. The resolution was 4–5 µm for each sample, and the rotation angle was 0.7°.
Biometrical measurements were performed on micro-CT and SEM images. Measurements are given as range and arithmetic mean ± standard error and coefficient of variation. The total number of measurements is indicated.
Abbreviations used in the figures: Alc: arch-like cavities; Az: autozooid; ClcLt: lateral channel-like cavities; ClcTr: transverse channel-like cavities; Cr: cryptocyst; Cv: peripheral cavern; Ct: craticula; ICh: internal chamber of ovicell; Ins: insula; Mc: microcavity; Ov: ovicell; SpB: basal septulum; SpD: distal septulum; SpL: lateral septulum; Tb: tube for passage of lophophore; Vb: vibraculum; WB: basal wall; WV: vertical wall.
Systematic palaeontology
Phylum Bryozoa Ehrenberg, 1831
Class Gymnolaemata Allman, 1856
Order Cheilostomata Busk, 1852
Infraorder Flustrina Smitt, 1867
Superfamily Microporoidea Gray, 1848
Family Coscinopleuridae Canu, 1913
Emended diagnosis. Colony erect, bifoliate. Cryptocyst surrounding the opesia from all sides. Opesia semicircular, never terminal, with two proximolateral opesiular indentations. Occlusor laminae maybe developed in the distal part of opesia. Ovicell endozooidal, ooecia cryptocystal, well-developed. Vibracula vicarious, always asymmetrical. Kenozooids present.
Remarks. This family of cheilostome bryozoans ranges from the middle Santonian of Vendôme, France [Acoscinopleura? vindocinensis (Filliozat, 1908)] to the Thanetian of Vincentown, USA [Coscinopleura digitata (Morton, 1834)]. Recently, Eschara lineolata Reuss, 1874 from the Strehlen Formation (mid-late Turonian) of Dresden-Strehlen or Weinböhla was identified to be a badly preserved coscinopleurid species (Martha et al. 2017). However, there is no indication of the provenance or the stratigraphy on the label, and the Turonian identity is therefore dubious. Furthermore, the presence of vibracula is not ascertained for this specimen.
The position of Coscinopleuridae within the Cheilostomata is uncertain. There are several reasons that make it reasonable to place the Coscinopleuridae within the suborder Flustrina Smitt, 1867 and within the superfamily Microporoidea Gray, 1848. Coscinopleurid bryozoans show clear morphological similarities with Onychocellidae Jullien, 1882, suggesting a close relationship between these two families (Voigt 1956) and even a possible origin of the Coscinopleuridae from the Onychocellidae. This is in particular visible in the presence of peripheral caverns in the cryptocyst of several species belonging to Acoscinopleura, Coscinopleura and Tremocoscinopleura, a feature known only from few non-coscinopleurid species of the Latest Cretaceous, all of which belong to the Onychocellidae Jullien, 1882.
In the emended diagnosis of this family, we consider the presence of vibracular polymorphs as a key character for Coscinopleuridae. This is justified by vibracula being an apomorphy in Coscinopleuridae, distinguishing this family from its probable ancestor Onychocellidae Jullien, 1882. Species of the genus Escharifora d’Orbigny, 1852, previously included in Coscinopleuridae, have avicularia that resemble those in onychocellid genera. Huge pores piercing through the autozooidal cryptocyst and resembling the peripheral caverns in several coscinopleurids are not considered justification enough to include this genus in Coscinopleuridae, as they also occur in some onychocellid species. Escharifora is therefore excluded herein from Coscinopleuridae. Excluding Escharifora, three genera are currently assigned to the Coscinopleuridae, mainly distinguished by the arrangement and morphology of the vibracula (Table 1). Species of Coscinopleura Marsson, 1887 have asymmetric vibracula (termed ‘coscinozooids’ in Voigt 1956) arranged in uniserial rows at the lateral margins of each colony and with a cryptocyst pierced by several small pores (termed ‘coscinopores’ in Voigt 1956). Species of Acoscinopleura Voigt, 1956 have vibracula irregularly arranged between the autozooids, and the vibracular cryptocyst lacks pores, whereas species of Tremocoscinopleura Voigt, 1956 have vibracula irregularly arranged between the autozooids and with a huge pore (termed ‘frontal pore’ in Voigt 1956).
Stratigraphic range. Middle Santonian (or late Turonian?) to Thanetian.
Genus Acoscinopleura Voigt, 1956
Type species. Coscinopleura foliacea (Voigt, 1930), early Maastrichtian, Rügen, Germany.
Emended diagnosis. Colony erect, bifoliate, eschariform or adeoniform and then dichotomously branching. Zooids arranged quincuncially. No gymnocyst. Cryptocyst pustulose, surrounding the opesia from all sides. Peripheral caverns sometimes present inside the cryptocyst, distally, laterally or proximally. Opesia not terminal, but a little more proximal, small, with two proximolateral opesiular indentations. Occlusor laminae maybe developed in the distal part of opesia. No spine bases. Ovicells endozooidal, ooecia cryptocystal, well-developed. Vibracula vicarious, irregularly placed among autozooids or forming rows at the lateral margins of a colony. Kenozooids present at margins of a colony.
Remarks. The genus Acoscinopleura was established in Voigt (1956) in a comprehensive revision of coscinopleurid cheilostomes. It includes coscinopleurid species with vicarious vibracula that are irregularly placed among the autozooids and a cryptocyst that is not pierced by pores. Vibracula can form, however, sometimes also short uniserial rows at the margins of a colony, similar to those usually found in Coscinopleura Marsson, 1887. Acoscinopleura was considered by Voigt (1956) to be the most primitive of the coscinopleurid genera.
Stratigraphic and geographic distribution. Middle Santonian (?) to late Maastrichtian of Western and Eastern Europe; late Maastrichtian of Central Asia.
Acoscinopleura foliacea (Voigt, 1930)
1925 Rhagasostoma elegans (von Hagenow, 1839) Varietet b—Levinsen: p. 369.
* 1930 Coscinopleura foliacea n. sp.—Voigt: p. 491; pl. 25, fig. 19; pl. 39, fig. 8.
? 1933 Coscinopleura foliacea Voigt, 1930—Schönfelder: p. 93; pl. 14, figs. 23a, b.
1956 Acoscinopleura foliacea (Voigt, 1930)—Voigt: p. 52; pl. 8, figs. 6–7; pl. 9, figs. 3–5.
2015 Acoscinopleura foliacea (Voigt, 1930)—Koromyslova et al.: p. 55; fig. 1A–г.
Studied material. Neotype: SMF 26421 [former Voigt photocard number 933], White Chalk from the early Maastrichtian, Rügen, Vorpommern, Germany (Figs. 2a–f, 3a, b). Other material: SMF 29949 (Fig. 2g–j), SMF 24105 [former Voigt photocard number 2427] (Fig. 2k–m), same locality and stratigraphy as the neotype.
Description. Colony rigidly erect, bifoliate, adeoniform. Zooids arranged quincuncially (Fig. 2a–c, g, k–m) and perfectly back-to-back (Fig. 2e–f, h–j), separated by broad and distinct furrows. Pore chambers lacking. Ancestrula and early astogenetic stages not observed.
Autozooids pyriform, long (L 543–850 µm; W 543–850 µm), with straight proximal ends and straight to weakly convex distal ends. Gymnocyst lacking. Cryptocyst extensive, thick, distal to opesia 1.5–6 times thicker than proximal to opesia, finely pustulose, slightly depressed, weakly sloping towards the opesia from all sides. Peripheral caverns developed inside the cryptocyst of almost all autozooids, proximolaterally, large, irregular in shape, sometimes with ribbed lateral and proximal walls and granular bottom, gradually deepening towards the proximal end of an autozooid, occupying less than half or half of the thickness of the cryptocyst (Fig. 2a, d–m), cryptocystal lid covering the peripheral caverns rarely preserved (Fig. 2e). Opesia small (L 60–107 µm; W 128–218 µm), semi-elliptical, not terminal, surrounded laterally and distally by a prominent and ribbed margin, with two symmetrical and short opesiular indentations proximolaterally enclosing a broad tongue with prominent but always unribbed margin (Fig. 2a, g, k–m). Autozooidal chamber long (L 580–690 µm; W 260–360 µm), wide near basal walls, deep, tight, boot-shaped with tapering proximal end and well-rounded corners, with short, transversely elliptical and tight tube for the passage of the lophophore distofrontally (Figs. 2b–f, h–j, 3a, b). Ovicells rare, endozooidal, immersed in the proximal cryptocyst of the distal zooid. Ooecia cryptocystal, well-developed, large, with two protruding proximolateral wings (Fig. 2m). Ovicellate autozooids with enlarged opesiae, cryptocyst is more steeply sloping towards the opesia.
Vibracula vicarious, shorter and narrower than autozooids (L 353–873 µm, W 227–417 µm), irregularly placed among autozooids (Fig. 2a, b, k, m). Cryptocyst finely pustulose, weakly convex, thickening proximally, always thinner than autozooidal cryptocyst, sometimes with peripheral caverns proximally. Craticula not observed. Opesia terminal, round, small, usually hidden by short, protruding tooth (Fig. 2m). Vibracular chamber shorter and deeper than autozooidal chambers, but of the same width (L 480–670 µm, W 260–330 µm), egg-shaped, with well-rounded corners, with very short, transversely rounded tube for the passage of the setae distofrontally (Fig. 2b, d).
Calcification of vertical and basal walls thick. Vertical autozooidal and vibracular walls with six tube-like septula connecting each zooid with all neighbouring zooids, two proximolaterally, two centrolaterally, one proximally and one distally (Fig. 2b, c). In vibracular walls centrolateral septulum sometimes lacking. Vertical walls gradually thickening from the centrolateral septula to the distal septula (Fig. 2b, c), with lateral channel-like cavities (Dm: 20–30 µm) beginning on the level of the proximo- and centrolateral septula and connected with them (Fig. 2b–d, f), with transverse channel-like cavities (Dm: 10–20 µm) beginning near the basal walls and not connected with the distal septula (Fig. 2f), with centrodistal arch-like cavities (Dm: 20–30 µm) encircling the distal septula and sometimes connected with them (Fig. 2b–f, h). Channel-like cavities connected with each other and forming a network that has the same shape as the zooid (Fig. 2b, c). Basal autozooidal and vibracular wall thin centrally, about 2–4 times thicker proximally and laterally (Fig. 2d–f, h–j), in autozooids with one pair of basal septula encircled by depressions opposite to the opesia (Fig. 2b, c, h, j). Microcavities connecting the peripheral caverns and slit-like cavities sometimes present (Fig. 2h).
Kenozooids present (Fig. 2k), variable in shape and size (L 242–676 µm; W 200–584 µm), sometimes similar in shape to autozooids, usually polygonal and smaller than autozooids, forming the lateral margins in some colonies. Cryptocyst flat, finely pustulose. Aperture very small (Dm: 43–84 µm), almost central, circular.
Biometrical details are summarised in Table S1 in the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Remarks. Acoscinopleura foliacea is the only species with proximolateral peripheral caverns. It differs from all other species examined, except for A. rugica, in having longer autozooids and the largest zooidal chambers. Also, the depressions encircling the basal septula are larger than in all other species. Peripheral caverns in A. foliacea are usually connected via microchannels with the slit-like cavities. A more detailed comparison of key morphological characters of species of Acoscinopleura studied herein is summarised in Table 2.
Stratigraphic and geographic distribution. Early Maastrichtian of Denmark: Island of Møn, Sjælland Region; Aalborg, North Denmark Region. Belgium: Phosphatic Chalk near Ciply in the Municipality of Mons, Wallonia.
Acoscinopleura albaruthenica sp. nov.
2015 Acoscinopleura fallax Voigt, 1956—Koromyslova et al.: p. 55; fig. 1д–ж.
Etymology. From Latin albaruthenica, ‘Belarussian’, referring to the type locality (Grodno) of the species Belarus.
Holotype. PIN 2922/244 (Figs. 3c, d, 4e–j).
Paratypes. PIN 2922/243 (Fig. 4a–d), PIN 2922/245.
Locality and Horizon. Quarry near Hrodna/Grodno (гpoднa/гpoднo), Grodno Region, Belarus, erratic block from the late Campanian.
Description. Colony rigidly erect, bifoliate, adeoniform. Zooids arranged quincuncially (Fig. 4a, b, d, e, i, j) and perfectly back-to-back (Fig. 4c, g, h), separated by broad and distinct furrows. Pore chambers lacking. Ancestrula and early astogenetic stages not observed.
Autozooids hexagonal, short (L 370–533 µm; W 194–385 µm), with straight proximal ends and straight to weakly convex distal ends. Gymnocyst lacking. Cryptocyst extensive, very thick, thickening proximally, distal to opesia 2–3 times thicker than proximal to opesia, finely pustulose, slightly depressed, weakly sloping towards the opesia from all sides. Peripheral caverns developed inside the cryptocyst of almost all autozooids, proximally, short and shallow, occupying less than half or half of the thickness of the cryptocyst, transversely rectangular, with walls steeply sloping inwards (Fig. 4a–c, e–i), cryptocystal lid covering the peripheral caverns rarely preserved (Fig. 4c). Opesia small (L 67–121 µm; W 113–143 µm), semi-elliptical, not terminal, surrounded laterally and distally by a prominent and ribbed margin, with two symmetrical and short opesiular indentations proximolaterally enclosing a broad but short tongue with prominent and ribbed margin (Fig. 4a, b, e). Autozooidal chamber short (L 400–500 µm; W 120–270 µm), narrow near basal walls, shallow, tight, boot-shaped with tapering proximal end and well-rounded corners, with long, transversely elliptical and tight tube for the passage of the lophophore distofrontally (Figs. 3d, 4g, h). Ovicells endozooidal, immersed in the proximal cryptocyst of the distal zooid. Ooecia cryptocystal, well-developed, sometimes placed underneath a peripheral cavern. Ovicellate autozooids with enlarged opesiae and the cryptocyst more steeply sloping towards the opesia.
Vibracula vicarious, shorter and narrower than autozooids (L 338–457 µm; W 139–203 µm), irregularly placed among autozooids. Cryptocyst finely pustulose, weakly convex, thickening proximally, thinner than autozooidal cryptocyst, sometimes with peripheral caverns. Craticula not observed. Opesia terminal, round, small, usually hidden by a protruding small tooth. Vibracular chamber shorter, shallower and usually narrower than autozooidal chamber (L 310–430 µm; W 160–210 µm), egg-shaped, with well-rounded corners, with very short, transversely rounded tube for the passage of the setae distofrontally (Fig. 4g, i, j).
Calcification of vertical and basal walls thick. Vertical autozooidal and vibracular walls with six tube-like septula connecting each zooid with all neighbouring zooids, two proximolaterally, two centrolaterally, one proximally and one distally. In vibracular walls centrolateral septulum sometimes lacking (Fig. 4j). Vertical walls gradually thickening from the centrolateral septula to the distal septula, with poorly observable lateral and transverse channel-like cavities (Dm: ~10 µm) (Fig. 4d), with centrodistal arch-like cavities (Dm: 10–20 µm) encircling the distal septula and sometimes connected with them and with the ovicell, if present (Fig. 4c, d, f–h, j). Basal autozooidal and vibracular wall thin centrally, about 1.5–2 times thicker proximally and laterally, in autozooids with one pair of basal septula encircled by depressions opposite to the opesia (Fig. 4d). Microcavities not observed.
Kenozooids present, variable in shape and size (L 383–562 µm; W 158–214 µm), usually polygonal and smaller than autozooids, forming the lateral margins of each colony (Fig. 4b). Cryptocyst flat, finely pustulose. Aperture very small (Dm: 46–51 µm), almost central, circular to elliptical.
Biometrical details are summarised in Table S2 in the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Remarks. Acoscinopleura albaruthenica sp. nov. is from a morphological point of view most closely related to A. fallax, A. foliacea and A. dualis sp. nov. It can be distinguished from these in the lack of microcavities and the channel-like cavities being very narrow. Furthermore, it differs from A. foliacea in having peripheral caverns only in the most proximal position, short hexagonal autozooids and smaller autozooidal chambers, from A. fallax in having shorter and shallower peripheral caverns and autozooidal chambers and from A. dualis sp. nov. in having smaller autozooidal and vibracular chambers and thinner vertical and basal walls.
Stratigraphic and geographic distribution. Late Campanian of Grodno Region, Belarus.
Acoscinopleura rugica Voigt, 1956
* 1956 Acoscinopleura rugica gen. et sp. nov.—Voigt: p. 53; pl. 9, figs. 1–2; pl. 12, figs. 1–3.
? 1969 Acoscinopleura rugica Voigt, 1956—Maryańska: p. 116; pl. X, fig. 2; pl. XI, fig. 4.
2015 Acoscinopleura rugica Voigt, 1956—Koromyslova et al.: p. 55; fig. 13-M.
Studied material. Holotype: SMF 24091 [former Voigt photocard number 2381], White Chalk of the early Maastrichtian, Rügen, Vorpommern, Germany (Figs. 3e, f, 5a–d). Other material: SMF 24095 [former Voigt photocard number 2379] (Fig. 5i–k), SMF 24102 [former Voigt photocard number 2380] (Fig. 5e–h), SMF 29946, SMF 29947, SMF 29948, same locality and stratigraphy as the holotype.
Description. Colony rigidly erect, bifoliate, eschariform or adeoniform. Zooids arranged quincuncially (Fig. 5a, c, e–f, i, j) and perfectly back-to-back (Fig. 5d, h), separated by broad and distinct furrows. Pore chambers lacking. Ancestrula and early astogenetic stages not observed.
Autozooids pyriform, short (L 483–550 µm; W 340–445 µm), with straight proximal ends and straight to weakly convex distal ends. Gymnocyst lacking. Cryptocyst extensive, very thick, thickening proximally, distal to opesia 1.5–3 times thicker than proximal to opesia, finely pustulose, slightly depressed, weakly sloping towards the opesia from all sides. Peripheral caverns developed inside the cryptocyst of only few autozooids, proximally, short and shallow, occupying less than half or half of the thickness of the cryptocyst, transversely rectangular, with walls steeply sloping inwards (Fig. 5a). Opesia small (L 70–95 µm; W 123–140 µm), semi-elliptical, not terminal, surrounded laterally and distally by a prominent and ribbed margin, with two symmetrical and short opesiular indentations proximolaterally enclosing a broad but short tongue with prominent and unribbed margin. Occlusor laminae in the distal part of opesia probably present (Fig. 5a). Autozooidal chamber long (L 480–710 µm; W 200–360 µm), wide near basal walls, deep, tight, shaped like a wedge, with well-rounded corners, with short, transversely elliptical and tight tube for the passage of the lophophore distofrontally (Figs. 3e, f, 5d). Ovicells endozooidal, immersed in the proximal cryptocyst of the distal zooid. Ooecia cryptocystal, well-developed, with two protruding proximolateral wings (Fig. 5e, h–k). Ovicellate autozooids with enlarged opesiae and the cryptocyst more steeply sloping towards the opesia.
Vibracula vicarious, same length as or longer but much narrower than autozooids (L 488–635 µm; W 148–258 µm), irregularly placed among autozooids, never forming rows at the lateral margins (Fig. 5a, e, i). Cryptocyst finely pustulose, weakly convex, thickening proximally, thinner than autozooidal cryptocyst, lacking peripheral caverns. Craticula small. Opesia terminal, circular, small, hidden by a short protruding tooth. Vibracular chamber about the same length as, but narrower and deeper than autozooidal chambers (L 440–630 µm; W 170–300 µm), egg-shaped, with well-rounded corners, with very short, transversely rounded tube for the passage of the setae distofrontally (Fig. 5d).
Calcification of vertical walls thick, of basal walls thin. Vertical autozooidal and vibracular walls with six tube-like septula connecting each zooid with all neighbouring zooids, two proximolaterally, two centrolaterally, one proximally and one distally (Fig. 5c). In vibracular walls centrolateral septulum sometimes lacking. Vertical walls gradually thickening from the centrolateral septula to the distal septula, with lateral channel-like cavities (Dm: 10–20 µm) beginning on the level of the proximo- and centrolateral septula and connected with them (Fig. 5c, f–h, j, k), with transverse channel-like cavities (Dm: 10–20 µm) beginning near the distal margin of the basal walls and not connected with the distal septula (Fig. 5c, f, g, k), with centrodistal arch-like cavities (Dm: 10–20 µm) encircling the distal septula and sometimes connected with them and with the ovicell, if present (Fig. 5c, g, h, j, k). Channel-like cavities connected with each other and forming a network that has the same shape as the zooid (Fig. 5f). Basal autozooidal and vibracular wall thin centrally, about 1.5–3 times thicker proximally and laterally (Fig. 5d), in autozooids with one pair of basal septula encircled by depressions opposite to the opesia (Fig. 5f, h, j, k). Microcavities connecting the peripheral caverns and arch-like cavities sometimes present.
Kenozooids present (Fig. 5e), variable in shape and size (L 203–233 µm; W 203–210 µm), usually polygonal and smaller than autozooids, forming the lateral margins of each colony. Cryptocyst flat, finely pustulose. Aperture very small (Dm: 25 µm), almost central, circular to elliptical. Intramural reparative budding kenozooids within host autozooids sometimes present (Fig. 5e).
Biometrical details are summarised in Table S3 in the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Remarks. The holotype of Acoscinopleura rugica is an eschariform colony, while the other two samples imaged in Voigt (1956) are adeoniform. Still, the morphological differences, also of the internal structures, are within the error margins and do not allow any species discrimination between eschariform and adeoniform colonies. A. rugica seems most closely related with A. crassa sp. nov. and A. dualis sp. nov. All three species have only rare and small peripheral caverns that are found scattered over the colony in only few autozooids. However, no correlation with the occurrence of peripheral caverns and the position of autozooids inside the colony could be found. A. rugica differs from A. crassa sp. nov. and A. dualis sp. nov. in having rare vibracula that are never aligned in rows at the lateral margins, in the calcification of the cryptocyst and the vertical and basal walls being thinner and in having the largest autozooidal and vibracular chambers.
Maryańska (1969) described 12 fragments from glauconitic sandstones of Nasiłów, Poland that she assigned to A. rugica. The colonies are eschariform, and vibracula are found irregularly placed among the autozooids and not in rows at the lateral margins. However, the autozooids are significantly smaller than in species of A. rugica from Rügen, conspecificity with the latter being therefore questionable but still within the realm of possibility.
Stratigraphic and geographic distribution. Early Maastrichtian of Rügen, Germany. ?Late Maastrichtian of Poland.
Acoscinopleura dualis sp. nov.
p 1956 Acoscinopleura fallax n. g. n. sp.—Voigt: p. 54; pl. 10, figs. 3, 6–7 (non pl. 10, figs. 1, 2, 4–5).
Etymology. From Latin dual (‘dual’), in reference to the new species having morphological features of both A. albaruthenica sp. nov. and A. rugica.
Holotype. SMF 24098 [former Voigt photocard number 2384] (Figs. 3g, h, 6a–h).
Locality and Horizon. Jasmund Peninsula, Isle of Rügen, Vorpommern, Germany, early Maastrichtian.
Paratypes. SMF 24092 [former Voigt photocard number 2388] (Fig. 6i), late Maastrichtian, Hemmoor-Basbeck, Lower Saxony, Germany; SMF 24093 [former Voigt photocard number 2386] (Fig. 6j), same locality and stratigraphy as the holotype.
Description. Colony rigidly erect, bifoliate, adeoniform. Zooids arranged quincuncially (Fig. 6a–c, f, g) and perfectly back-to-back (Fig. 6d, e, i, j), separated by broad and distinct furrows. Pore chambers lacking. Ancestrula and early astogenetic stages not observed.
Autozooids pyriform or hexagonal, long (L 467–684 µm; W 317–452 µm), with straight proximal ends and straight to weakly convex distal ends. Gymnocyst lacking. Cryptocyst extensive, very thick, thickening proximally, distal to opesia 2–3 times thicker than proximal to opesia, finely pustulose, slightly depressed, weakly sloping towards the opesia from all sides. Peripheral caverns developed inside the cryptocyst of few autozooids, irregularly occurring, proximally, short and shallow, occupying less than half or half of the thickness of the cryptocyst, transversely rectangular, with walls steeply sloping inwards (Fig. 6a, c, e). Opesia small (L 48–84 µm; W 119–151 µm), semi-elliptical, not terminal, surrounded laterally and distally by a prominent and unribbed margin, with two symmetrical and short opesiular indentations, proximolaterally enclosing a broad but short tongue with prominent and unribbed margin (Fig. 6b, c). Autozooidal chamber short (L 450–560 µm; W 160–360 µm), wide near basal walls, shallow, tight, boot-shaped with tapering proximal end and well-rounded corners, with long, transversely elliptical and tight tube for the passage of the lophophore distofrontally (Figs. 3g, h, 6d, e, i, j). Ovicells endozooidal, immersed in the proximal cryptocystal portion of the distal zooid. Ooecia cryptocystal, well-developed (Fig. 6c, e). Ovicellate autozooids with enlarged opesiae and the cryptocyst more steeply sloping towards the opesia.
Vibracula vicarious, shorter and narrower than autozooids (L 504–676 µm; W 147–222 µm), irregularly placed among autozooids in central part of the colonies and forming a row of few at the lateral margins of a colony (Fig. 6a–c). Cryptocyst finely pustulose, weakly convex, thickening proximally, thinner than autozooidal cryptocyst, sometimes with peripheral caverns. Craticula small (Fig. 6b). Opesia terminal, round, small, hidden by a protruding small tooth. Vibracular chamber shorter, deeper and usually narrower than autozooidal chambers (L 340–470 µm; W 170–260 µm), egg-shaped, with well-rounded corners, with very short, transversely rounded tube for the passage of the setae distofrontally (Fig. 6j).
Calcification of vertical walls thick, of basal walls thin. Vertical autozooidal and vibracular walls with six tube-like septula connecting each zooid with all neighbouring zooids, two proximolaterally, two centrolaterally, one proximally and one distally. In vibracular walls centrolateral septulum usually lacking (Fig. 6g). Vertical walls gradually thickening from the centrolateral septula to the distal septula, with lateral channel-like cavities (Dm: 10–20 µm) beginning on the level of the proximo- and centrolateral septula and connected with them (Fig. 6f, h), with transverse channel-like cavities (Dm: 10–20 µm) beginning near the distal margin of the basal walls and not connected with the distal septula (Fig. 6f, h), with centrodistal arch-like cavities (Dm: 10–20 µm) encircling the distal septula and sometimes connected with them (Fig. 6g, h). Channel-like cavities connected with each other and forming a network that has the same shape as the zooids (Fig. 6f). Basal autozooidal and vibracular wall thin centrally, about 1.5–3 times thicker proximally and laterally, in autozooids with one pair of basal septula encircled by depressions opposite to the opesia (Fig. 6f, h). Microcavities not observed.
Kenozooids present, variable in shape and size, usually polygonal and smaller than autozooids (L 259–325 µm; W 162–400 µm), forming the lateral margins of each colony (Fig. 6b). Cryptocyst flat, finely pustulose. Aperture very small (Dm: 29–37 µm), almost central, roundish to elliptical.
Biometrical details are summarised in Table S4 in the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Remarks. Re-examination of the material formerly described in Voigt (1956) as Acoscinopleura fallax showed that the samples imaged on pl. 10, Figs. 3, 6, 7 significantly differ from the holotype. Specimens assigned to A. dualis sp. nov. have only few peripheral caverns, which are small and compare well with those of A. albaruthenica sp. nov. The new species compares well with A. rugica and A. crassa sp. nov., but differs from them in microcavities connecting the peripheral caverns with the arch-like cavities lacking. Furthermore, A. dualis sp. nov. differs from A. rugica in having a row of vibracula at the lateral margins and from A. crassa sp. nov. in having a thinner calcification of the basal walls.
Stratigraphic and geographic distribution. Early to late Maastrichtian of Germany.
Acoscinopleura crassa sp. nov.
Etymology. From Latin crassus (‘fat’), in reference to the thick calcification of the cryptocyst and autozooidal walls.
Holotype. SMF 29950 (Figs. 3i, j, 7a–f).
Locality and Horizon. Hemmoor, Lower Saxony, Germany, late Maastrichtian.
Paratypes. SMF 29951 (Fig. 7g), SMF 29952 (Fig. 7h–m), White Chalk of the early Maastrichtian, Rügen, Vorpommern, Germany.
Description. Colony rigidly erect, bifoliate, adeoniform (Fig. 7a). Zooids arranged quincuncially (Fig. 7a–c, h, i) and perfectly back-to-back (Fig. 7e–f, l, m). Zooids separated by broad and distinct furrows. Pore chambers lacking. Ancestrula and early astogenetic stages not observed.
Autozooids hexagonal or pyriform (L 450–675 µm; W 360–451 µm), with straight proximal ends and straight to weakly convex distal ends. Gymnocyst lacking. Cryptocyst extensive, very thick, thickening proximally, distal to opesia 2 times thicker than proximal to opesia, finely pustulose, slightly depressed, weakly sloping towards the opesia from all sides. Peripheral caverns developed inside the cryptocyst of very few autozooids, proximally, short and shallow, occupying half or more of the thickness of the cryptocyst, transversely rectangular, with walls steeply sloping inwards (Fig. 7e, l). Opesia small (L 73–94 µm; W 110–167 µm), semi-elliptical, not terminal, surrounded laterally and distally by a prominent and ribbed margin, with two symmetrical and short opesiular indentations proximolaterally enclosing a broad tongue with prominent and unribbed margin (Fig. 7a, g–i). Autozooidal chamber short (L 380–580 µm; W 150–230 µm), narrow near basal walls, shallow, tight, shaped like a wedge, with well-rounded corners, with long, transversely elliptical and tight tube for the passage of the lophophore distofrontally (Figs. 3i, j, 7b, e, f, l, m). Ovicells rare, endozooidal, immersed in the proximal cryptocystal portion of the distal zooid, sometimes with internal chamber, ooecia cryptocystal well-developed, with two protruding proximolateral wings (Fig. 7h, j–l). Ovicellate autozooids show enlarged opesiae, and the cryptocyst is more steeply sloping into the opesia (Fig. 7h).
Vibracula vicarious, same length as or shorter and much narrower than autozooids (L 373–639 µm; W 139–245 µm), irregularly placed among autozooids and usually forming a row of few at the lateral margins of the colony. Cryptocyst finely pustulose, weakly convex, thickening proximally, thinner than autozooidal cryptocyst. Peripheral caverns lacking. Craticula small (Fig. 7i). Opesia terminal, circular, small, hidden by a short protruding tooth. Vibracular chamber shorter and narrower than autozooidal chamber (L 270–500 µm; W 130–180 µm), egg-shaped, with well-rounded corners, with very short, transversely rounded tube for the passage of the setae distofrontally (Fig. 7m).
Calcification of vertical and basal walls thick. Vertical autozooidal and vibracular walls with six tube-like septula connecting each zooid with all neighbouring zooids, two proximolaterally, two centrolaterally, one proximally and one distally. In vibracular walls centrolateral septulum usually lacking (Fig. 7b). Vertical walls gradually thickening from the centrolateral septula to the distal septula, with lateral channel-like cavities (Dm: 10–20 µm) beginning on the level of the proximo- and centrolateral septula and connected with them (Fig. 7b, c, f), with transverse channel-like cavities (Dm: 10–20 µm) beginning near the distal margin of the basal walls and not connected with the distal septula (Fig. 7b–d), with centrodistal arch-like cavities (Dm: 10–20 µm) encircling the distal septula and sometimes connected with them and with the ovicell, if present (Fig. 7d–f, k). Channel-like cavities connected with each other and forming a network that has the same shape as the zooids (Fig. 7c). Basal autozooidal and vibracular wall only slightly thickening from the centre towards the proximal and lateral margins (Fig. 7d, f, j, m), in autozooids with one pair of basal septula encircled by depressions opposite to the opesia (Fig. 7c). Microcavities connecting the peripheral caverns and arch-like cavities sometimes present (Fig. 7e).
Kenozooids present, variable in shape and size (L 253–655 µm; W 123–363 µm), usually polygonal and smaller than autozooids, forming the lateral margins of each colony (Fig. 7g). Cryptocyst flat, finely pustulose. Aperture very small (Dm: 21–43 µm), almost central, circular to elliptical. Intramural reparative budding kenozooids within host autozooids sometimes present (Fig. 7h, i).
Biometrical details are summarised in Table S5 in the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Remarks. A. crassa sp. nov. differs from A. foliacea, A. albaruthenica sp. nov. and A. fallax in having only few autozooids with peripheral caverns. Furthermore, it shows the thickest calcification of the cryptocyst and of the vertical and basal walls. Thus, it can readily be distinguished in CT sections.
Stratigraphic and geographic distribution. Early to late Maastrichtian of Germany.
Acoscinopleura fallax Voigt, 1956
? 1840 Eschara gladiiformis n. sp.—von Hagenow: p. 645.
? 1930 Coscinopleura lamourouxi (von Hagenow, 1851)—Voigt: p. 491; pl. 25, fig. 18.
*p 1956 Acoscinopleura fallax n. g. n. sp.—Voigt: p. 54; pl. 10, fig. 1 (non pl. 10, figs. 2–7).
? 1959a Eschara gladiiformis von Hagenow, 1840 = Acoscinopleura fallax Voigt, 1956—Voigt: p. 47.
? 1969 Acoscinopleura fallax Voigt, 1956—Maryańska: p. 115; pl. XI, fig. 1.
? 1992 Acoscinopleura fallax Voigt, 1956—Favorskaya: p. 130; pl. 69, fig. 6–8.
non 2015 Acoscinopleura fallax Voigt, 1956—Koromyslova et al.: p. 55; fig. 1д–ж.
Studied material. Holotype: SMF 24097 [former Voigt photocard number 2389], late Maastrichtian, Hemmoor, Lower Saxony, Germany (Figs. 3k, 8a–h).
Description. Colony rigidly erect, bifoliate, adeoniform. Zooids arranged quincuncially (Fig. 8a, b, e, f) and perfectly back-to-back (Fig. 8c, d). Zooids separated by broad and distinct furrows. Pore chambers lacking. Ancestrula and early astogenetic stages not observed.
Autozooids hexagonal, moderately large (L 405–598 µm; W 302–359 µm), with straight proximal ends and straight to weakly convex distal ends. Gymnocyst lacking. Cryptocyst extensive, very thick, distal to opesia 2–3 times thicker than proximal to opesia, thickening proximally, finely pustulose, slightly depressed, weakly sloping towards the opesia from all sides. Peripheral caverns developed inside the cryptocyst of almost all autozooids, proximally, short and deep, transversely rectangular, with walls steeply sloping inwards (Fig. 8a, b, d), cryptocystal lid covering the peripheral caverns not observed. Opesia small (L 84–105 µm; W 115–169 µm), semi-elliptical, not terminal, surrounded laterally and distally by a prominent and ribbed margin, with two symmetrical and short opesiular indentations proximolaterally enclosing a broad but short tongue with prominent but unribbed margin. Occlusor laminae in the distal part of opesia present (Fig. 8b). Autozooidal chamber short (L 480–540 µm; W 190–250 µm), narrow near basal walls, deep, tight, boot-shaped with tapering proximal end and well-rounded corners, with long, transversely elliptical and tight tube for the passage of the lophophore distofrontally (Figs. 3k, 8d). Ooecia not observed.
Vibracula vicarious, longer than or about the same length as autozooids but usually narrower (L 390–681 µm; W 91–182 µm), irregularly placed among autozooids or forming a row of few at the lateral margins of the colony (Fig. 8a, b). Cryptocyst finely pustulose, weakly convex, thickening proximally, thinner than autozooidal cryptocyst, sometimes with peripheral caverns. Craticula small. Opesia terminal, round, small, usually hidden by a protruding small tooth. Vibracular chamber almost the same length as autozooidal chambers (L 350–540 µm; W 160–220 µm), but shallower, egg-shaped, with well-rounded corners, with very short, transversely rounded tube for the passage of the setae distofrontally (Fig. 8c).
Calcification of vertical and basal walls thick. Vertical autozooidal and vibracular walls with six tube-like septula connecting each zooid with all neighbouring zooids, two proximolaterally, two centrolaterally, one proximally and one distally. In vibracular walls proximolateral septulum usually lacking (Fig. 8e). Vertical walls gradually thickening from the centrolateral septula to the distal septula, with lateral channel-like cavities (Dm: 20–30 µm) beginning on the level of the proximo- and centrolateral septula and connected with them (Fig. 8e–h), with transverse channel-like cavities (Dm: 20–30 µm) beginning near the distal margin of the basal walls and not connected with the distal septula (Fig. 8f, g), with centrodistal arch-like cavities (Dm: 30–40 µm) encircling the distal septula and sometimes connected with them and with the peripheral caverns (Fig. 8d, e, g, h). Channel-like cavities connected with each other and forming a network that has the same shape as the zooids (Fig. 8f). Basal autozooidal and vibracular wall only slightly thickening from the centre towards the proximal and lateral margins (Fig. 8d, g, h), in autozooids with one pair of basal septula encircled by depressions opposite to the opesia (Fig. 8f, h). Microcavities connecting the peripheral caverns and arch-like cavities sometimes present (Fig. 8d).
Kenozooids present, variable in shape and size (L 212–533 µm; W 89–154 µm), usually polygonal and smaller than autozooids, forming the lateral margins of each colony. Cryptocyst flat, finely pustulose. Aperture small (Dm: 24–44 µm), almost central, circular to elliptical (Fig. 8a, b).
Biometrical details are summarised in Table S6 in the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Remarks. Voigt (1956) already noted that the samples imaged by him and assigned to Acoscinopleura fallax show many variations and may represent several species. Re-examination of the type material showed that the holotype of A. fallax has numerous autozooids with large peripheral caverns, while peripheral caverns are very rare in other samples assigned to A. fallax in Voigt (1956). Moreover, peripheral caverns are smaller and compare with those of A. albaruthenica sp. nov. from the late Campanian of Belarus. We therefore restrict A. fallax to the holotype only and the other material described in Voigt (1956) as A. fallax is here described as two new species. The specimens imaged as A. fallax in Voigt (1956, pl. 10, figs.3, 6–7) are redescribed as A. dualis sp. nov., while the samples imaged as A. fallax in Voigt (1956, pl. 10, figs. 2, 4–5) are redescribed as A. occulta sp. nov.
Voigt (1959) suggested that Acoscinopleura fallax Voigt, 1956 might be a subjective junior synonym of Eschara gladiiformis von Hagenow, 1840. He invalidated the name gladiiformis declaring it as a nomen nudum since von Hagenow (1840) had no image of the species and his description was too inadequate to allow subsequent recognition of the species without re-examination of von Hagenow’s material. Voigt (1959, p. 47) noted: “Nach der nichtssagenden Beschreibung v. Hagenows kann die Art unmöglich erkannt werden, zumal die charakteristischen Vibracularien nicht erwähnt werden” (“It is impossible to recognize this species because of the inadequate description of v. Hagenow, especially as the characteristic vibracula are not mentioned”). Taking into account the strong variability of A. fallax sensu Voigt (1956) and since there is no redescription and no image of the von Hagenow material in Voigt (1959), it cannot be decided if A. gladiiformis and A. fallax are conspecific or not.
The material (40 fragments) assigned to A. fallax from late Maastrichtian glauconitic sandstones of Nasiłów, Poland in Maryańska (1969) are adeoniform colonies with proximal peripheral caverns. Without re-examination of the material, it cannot be decided to which species it belongs. Favorskaya (1992) described material found in late Campanian to Maastrichtian strata of the southern Aral Sea region that she assigned to A. fallax. As with the material from Poland, re-examination is necessary to clarify its identity. Bryozoans from the late Campanian of Belarus described as A. fallax in Koromyslova et al. (2015) belong to A. albaruthenica sp. nov. Peripheral caverns in A. fallax are found proximally and are similar in shape and position to those observed in A. albaruthenica sp. nov., but usually significantly larger.
Stratigraphic and geographic distribution. Late Maastrichtian of Lower Saxony, Germany.
Acoscinopleura occulta sp. nov.
p 1956 Acoscinopleura fallax n. g. n. sp.—Voigt: p. 54; pl. 10, figs. 2, 4–5 (non pl. 10, figs. 1, 3, 6–7).
Etymology. From Latin occulta (‘hidden’), in reference to the interconnected internal peripheral caverns that are evident only when studying the interior morphology.
Holotype. SMF 24086 [former Voigt photocard number 2385] (Figs. 3l, 9a–i).
Paratypes. SMF 24099 [former Voigt photocard number 748] (Fig. 9n, o), SMF 24104 [former Voigt photocard number 2387] (Fig. 9j–m).
Locality and Horizon. Hemmoor, Lower Saxony, Germany, late Maastrichtian.
Description. Colony rigidly erect, bifoliate, adeoniform. Zooids arranged quincuncially (Fig. 9a, b, d–f, l) and perfectly back-to-back (Fig. 9h–k, n, o). Zooids separated by broad and distinct furrows. Pore chambers lacking. Ancestrula and early astogenetic stages not observed.
Autozooids hexagonal, moderately large (L 462–545 µm; W 320–357 µm), with straight proximal ends and straight to weakly convex distal ends. Gymnocyst lacking. Cryptocyst extensive, very thick, distal to opesia 2–3 times thicker than proximal to opesia, finely pustulose, slightly depressed, weakly sloping towards the opesia from all sides. Peripheral caverns developed inside the cryptocyst of almost all autozooids, usually fully covered by a thick cryptocystal portion and not visible on the surface, interconnected with each other, comprising most of the cryptocyst except the portion around the tube for the passage of the lophophore (Fig. 9d, e, g, i, k). Some few peripheral caverns that are visible on the colony surface occur proximally, short and shallow, transversely rectangular, with walls steeply sloping inwards (Fig. 9n). Opesia small (L 79–100 µm; W 103–122 µm), semi-elliptical, not terminal, surrounded laterally and distally by a prominent margin, with two symmetrical opesiular indentations advancing deep into the cryptocyst proximolaterally and enclosing a broad and long tongue with prominent margin (Fig. 9a, b). Occlusor laminae in the distal part of opesia present (Fig. 9b). Autozooidal chamber short (L 430–500 µm; W 210–270 µm), narrow near basal walls, shallow, tight, boot-shaped with tapering proximal end and well-rounded corners, with short, transversely elliptical and tight tube for the passage of the lophophore distofrontally (Figs. 3l, 9i, j, n, o). Ovicells endozooidal, immersed in the proximal cryptocystal portion of the distal zooid. Ooecia cryptocystal well-developed, sometimes placed beneath a peripheral cavern (Fig. 9j, l, m).
Vibracula vicarious, about the same length as or longer but usually narrower than autozooids (L 512–614 µm; W 136–184 µm), forming a row of few at the lateral margins of the colony (Fig. 9a). Cryptocyst finely pustulose, weakly convex, thickening proximally, thinner than cryptocyst of autozooids, sometimes with internal caverns. Craticula small. Opesia terminal, round, small, usually hidden by a protruding small tooth. Vibracular chamber shorter, shallower and usually narrower than autozooidal chamber (L 310–420 µm; W 190–230 µm), egg-shaped, with well-rounded corners, with very short, transversely rounded tube for the passage of the setae distofrontally (Fig. 9d, h).
Calcification of vertical walls thick, of basal walls thin. Vertical autozooidal and vibracular walls with six tube-like septula connecting each zooid with all neighbouring zooids, two proximolaterally, two centrolaterally, one proximally and one distally. In vibracular walls centrolateral septulum usually lacking. Vertical walls gradually thickening from the centrolateral septula to the distal septula, with lateral channel-like cavities (Dm: 10–30 µm) beginning on the level of the proximo- and centrolateral septula and connected with them (Fig. 9f, i, k, l), with transverse channel-like cavities (Dm: 10–20 µm) beginning near the distal margin of the basal walls and not connected with the distal septula (Fig. 9f, g), with centrodistal arch-like cavities (Dm: 10–30 µm) encircling the distal septula and sometimes connected with them and with the ovicell, if present (Fig. 9f, g, i, k, l). Channel-like cavities connected with each other and forming a network that has the same shape as the zooids (Fig. 9f, l). Basal autozooidal and vibracular wall thin centrally, about 2–3 times thicker proximally and laterally, in autozooids with one pair of basal septula encircled by depressions opposite to the opesia (Fig. 9f, l). Microcavities not observed.
Kenozooids present, variable in shape and size (L 290–347 µm; W 191–228 µm), usually polygonal and smaller than autozooids, forming the lateral margins of colony. Cryptocyst flat, finely pustulose. Aperture small (Dm: 34–41 µm), almost central, circular to elliptical (Fig. 9a, c).
Biometrical details are summarised in Table S7 in the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Remarks. Superficial differences of the new species Acoscinopleura occulta sp. nov. with A. fallax include the vibracula being larger and the opesiular indentations being longer (Fig. 9a). Micro-CT analyses revealed further significant internal morphological differences between A. fallax and A. occulta sp. nov. A. occulta sp. nov. developed internal peripheral caverns inside the cryptocyst of each autozooid, which completely surround the opesial tube. The internal peripheral caverns usually show no connection with the autozooidal chamber, but they are interconnected with each other, both laterally and vertically, a feature not observed in any other species of Acoscinopleura studied. Internal caverns which surround the opesia may result in cryptocystal insulae surrounding the opesia when the cryptocyst breaks away post mortem, as found in some other coscinopleurid species, for example Coscinopleura lamourouxi (von Hagenow, 1851). The specimens SMF 24099 and SMF 24104 are assigned to the new species, although they differ from the holotype in interconnected the internal peripheral caverns being rarer and not well developed (Fig. 9j, k, n, o). Furthermore, these specimens show rare peripheral caverns on the colony’s surface, which are small and morphologically compare well with those in A. albaruthenica sp. nov. (Fig. 9n).
Stratigraphic and geographic distribution. Late Maastrichtian of Lower Saxony, Germany.
Discussion
Distinguishing the species of Acoscinopleura Voigt, 1956
The late Turonian or middle Santonian to Thanetian Coscinopleuridae Canu, 1913 is a family of locally very abundant species that have not been comprehensively studied. A problem in the study of Coscinopleuridae is the distinction of species, which is severely hampered by the colonies showing very strong variability in appearance. For example, the size of autozooids strongly varies depending on how far they are positioned from the base of the colony. Furthermore, zooidal morphology in Coscinopleuridae shows only little variation over time (Håkansson and Thomsen 2001). Therefore, only few characters have proven suitable for taxon differentiation. Voigt (1956) considered especially the size of the opesia in fertile autozooids, the position of the vibracula and the peripheral caverns important to discriminate species. Voigt (1956) also gave the most comprehensive revision of this problematic bryozoan family to date. He distinguished 18 species and subspecies that were divided into three genera, two of which, Acoscinopleura and Tremocoscinopleura, were newly proposed. One additional species assigned to Acoscinopleura was first described in Georgala and Brood (1974) from the late Campanian of Scania, Sweden. Moreover, only a few authors have included coscinopleurid species in faunistic studies (e.g. Berthelsen 1962; Veenstra 1963; Maryańska 1969; Voigt 1979b).
We re-examined the type material of three closely related species of Acoscinopleura, A. fallax Voigt, 1956, A. foliacea (Voigt, 1930) and A. rugica Voigt, 1956, from the Maastrichtian of northern Germany and additional material from the Voigt Collection and from the late Campanian of Belarus. Our study included not only traditional SEM but also the use of micro-CT, which allowed non-destructive examination of the interior morphology of the bryozoan colonies. Therefore, the examination of zooidal chambers and internal features such as septula, pore chambers, endozooidal ovicells etc. was possible and additional characters could be identified that proved useful for species differentiation. These include the size of autozooidal and vibracular chambers, the occurrence and position of arch-like and channel-like cavities and microcavities and the thickness of calcification of the cryptocyst and the basal and vertical walls.
Our studies confirm the identification of the material of A. foliacea and A. rugica as provided in Voigt (1956) and also confirm the concerns Voigt (1956) expressed regarding the conspecifity of the material included by him in A. fallax. Type material of the latter is shown to belong to three different species, two of which, A. dualis sp. nov. and A. occulta sp. nov., are newly described herein, and the specific name fallax is restricted to the holotype only. The holotype of A. fallax differs significantly from other colonies assigned to A. fallax by Voigt (1956) as it has larger autozooidal chambers and the largest peripheral caverns. Two new species, A. dualis sp. nov. and A. occulta sp. nov., are created for the material excluded from A. fallax. A. dualis sp. nov. has few proximal peripheral caverns, which are smaller than those in A. fallax and compare with those of A. albaruthenica sp. nov. A. occulta sp. nov. has large caverns inside the cryptocyst of each autozooid, which completely surround the opesial tube. The internal caverns are interconnected with each other, and if the cryptocystal cover would break, an insula surrounding the opesia would be observable. However, in the studied material, the cryptocyst was largely intact and only few peripheral caverns were observed in the proximal portion of the cryptocyst, which are comparable to the peripheral caverns observed in A. albaruthenica sp. nov.
Two further new species were created for material not studied in Voigt (1956). A. crassa sp. nov. is based on material from the Voigt Collection from the early Maastrichtian of Rügen and the late Maastrichtian of Hemmoor. It has thick calcification of the cryptocyst and the vertical and basal walls. Peripheral caverns are rare and only very small. The other species, A. albaruthenica sp. nov., is created for material from the late Campanian of Belarus. It has small autozooidal chambers and vibracula occur irregularly among autozooids but never as rows at the lateral margins.
On the vertical and basal walls
Each autozooid in a colony of a species of Acoscinopleura is surrounded by seven zooids; six autozooids hexagonally encircle the autozooid in the same lamina, while one autozooid is placed perfectly back-to-back. Interzooidal communication is achieved via septula that are located in the vertical and basal walls. Septula in the vertical walls allow communication with all six neighbouring zooids via one septulum, while communication with the autozooid on the back side is achieved via two septula. Despite this, septula in the basal walls are usually, but not invariably, larger than septula in the vertical walls. Vibracula are usually surrounded by only six zooids, five of which are located in the same lamina, plus one vibraculum placed perfectly back-to-back. This results in the number of septula in the vertical walls being reduced by one. There are no septula in the basal wall, and therefore communication with the vibraculum on the back side is not possible.
Calcification of the vertical walls is thick in all species examined, and the walls usually gradually thicken in each autozooid from the centrolateral septula to the distal septulum. Deep inside the vertical walls, small channel-like cavities with diameter <30 µm are visible in CT sections of all specimens examined (Fig. 10). Channel-like cavities in the lateral walls begin at the level of the proximo- and centrolateral septula and are connected with them, while in the transverse walls, they begin near the distal margin of the basal wall but are not connected with the distal septula. Channel-like cavities in the lateral and transverse walls are interconnected and completely surround each autozooid. The majority of Recent cheilostomes are believed to have double lateral vertical walls but only single transverse vertical walls (Levinsen 1891; Banta 1968a, b). Calcareous parts of the lateral walls therefore, consist of two calcareous laminae separated by an unpaired intercalary cuticle. The lateral and transverse channel-like cavities of Acoscinopleura might be gaps in the skeleton, which were occupied in life by the intercalary cuticle. However, in this case, the transverse walls in the studied specimens must also have been double, since channel-like cavities are interconnected. A comparable network of cavities between the primary basal zooid walls and the visible calcified basal surface was also reported from lunulitiform bryozoans (Chimonides and Cook 1994). A second type of cavity was found in the centrodistal part of the vertical walls. These cavities encircle the distal septula and are termed ‘arch-like cavities’ herein. The arch-like cavities are connected with the channel-like cavities and usually, but not invariably, with the distal septula and the ovicells. The function and formation of the arch-like cavities remain unclear.
Calcification of the basal wall in Acoscinopleura is usually much thinner than calcification of the vertical walls, but in two species (A. crassa sp. nov. and A. fallax), calcification of the basal walls is thick, thus comparing with the calcification of the vertical walls. The basal wall in some Recent cheilostome bryozoans with erect bifoliate colonies is double, indicating that the colony grew as two independent layers, back to back (Carson 1978; Silén 1981). Double basal walls have also been observed in late Campanian tessaradomid cheilostomes using micro-CT (Koromyslova and Pakhnevich 2016). However, in the studied material of Acoscinopleura, there are no indicators found in the basal walls that would suggest that they are double.
Peripheral caverns
Peripheral caverns in the cryptocyst of autozooids are a morphological feature found only in few cheilostome bryozoans belonging exclusively to the families Onychocellidae Jullien, 1882 and Coscinopleuridae Canu, 1913. Furthermore, only species from the Late Cretaceous developed such structures (Table 3). The peripheral caverns can develop in different parts of the cryptocyst and usually the cryptocystal portion surrounding the opesia is not affected. Two types of peripheral caverns can be distinguished. In type 1, small, single hollows are developed inside the cryptocyst (Fig. 10a). Type 1 peripheral caverns usually affect only some autozooids of a colony and occur very irregularly. However, they affect always the same parts of the cryptocyst and are always identical in shape and size. Type 1 peripheral caverns are therefore considered taxon dependent on a species level and can thus be used for discriminating species. In type 2 peripheral caverns, a depression surrounds a ‘raised’ cryptocystal portion, the ‘insula’ in the sense of Voigt (1956), around the opesia (Fig. 10b). The occurrence of type 2 peripheral caverns seems to be the more primitive state and is much more regular than the occurrence of peripheral caverns, as it usually affects all autozooids of a colony. It is noteworthy that both species with type 1 and type 2 peripheral caverns have mostly bifoliate colonies. While material of A. foliacea, A. albaruthenica sp. nov., A. rugica, A. dualis sp. nov., A. crassa sp. nov. and A. fallax developed type 1 peripheral caverns, A. occulta sp. nov. has type 2 peripheral caverns. However, since the cryptocystal lid covering the peripheral caverns did not break away, type 2 peripheral caverns are not visible on the surface but could be visualised only using micro-CT.
Canu (1900) and Voigt (1989) interpreted the evolution of type 2 peripheral caverns as a sign of ageing of the bryozoan colony, as younger autozooids often lack such structures [e.g. Onychocella latilabris (Reuss, 1872) in Voigt 1989; pl. 14, fig. 7]. Voigt (1956) suggested that peripheral caverns in Coscinopleuridae could have developed in older zooids as a result of recess of calcite for the relief of the skeleton, as all Acoscinopleura species show unusually thick calcification of the cryptocyst. However, in the material that we examined, autozooids closer to the base of the colony, i.e. older autozooids, are not more likely to develop peripheral caverns than autozooids located more distally, i.e. younger autozooids. This puts into question the interpretation of peripheral caverns as a result of ageing. Voigt (1985) and Taylor and McKinney (2006) argued that peripheral caverns may develop during overgrowth of the primary cryptocyst by a secondary cryptocyst, the peripheral caverns then having been occupied with diagenetically unstable aragonite or high-Mg calcite. If this was the case, our study suggests that the layer of aragonite/high-Mg calcite must have been covered by a small layer of low-Mg calcite. This would mean that peripheral caverns developed post mortem after dissolution of aragonite/high-Mg calcite and breakage of the thin low-Mg cover.
Another possible explanation for the evolution of peripheral caverns is a correlation with the hydrostatic system (Voigt 1956). Peripheral caverns may have been filled with coelomic fluid, as suggested in an alternative model for the evolution of peripheral caverns presented in Voigt (1985). In the material studied, we found microcavities connecting the peripheral caverns with the arch-like cavities in specimens of A. foliacea, A. rugica, A. crassa sp. nov. and A. fallax. However, evidence for such connections of the peripheral caverns with other parts of the zooids is insufficient. A problem in the explanation of the evolution of peripheral caverns is why only certain autozooids of a colony developed such structures. We observed no correlation with the position of the autozooids in a colony having or lacking peripheral caverns. Despite the irregular occurrence of peripheral caverns, there is no indication that they were produced by boring predators, so predation can be excluded as a reason for the evolution of peripheral caverns. It remains therefore unclear what triggered certain autozooids to develop peripheral caverns. A convincing model for the evolution of peripheral caverns can therefore not be suggested.
Conclusions
The following conclusions can be made based on the results presented in this paper:
-
The internal morphology of species of Acoscinopleura is complex. The material examined shows cavities inside the lateral and transverse walls (=lateral and transverse channel-like cavities, respectively) and encircling the distal septula (=arch-like cavities).
-
Interzooidal communication in Acoscinopleura is done via septula. Each zooid is connected via one septulum with each of the encircling zooids in the same lamina. Furthermore, autozooids are connected via two septula in the back wall with the autozooid on the back side, while vibracula arranged back-to-back are not interconnected.
-
Examination of the internal morphology may add a sufficient amount of characters useful for taxon differentiation in complicated taxa such as coscinopleurid cheilostomes. For the material examined, these include the size of autozooidal and vibracular chambers, the occurrence and position of arch-like and channel-like cavities and microcavities and the thickness of calcification of the cryptocyst and the basal and vertical walls.
-
Peripheral caverns can be subdivided into two types: type 1, small, single hollows developed inside the cryptocyst, and type 2, a depression surrounding an insular cryptocystal portion around the opesia. Both types were covered during lifetime by a thin cryptocystal lid.
References
Alexandrowicz, S.W. 1965. Stratygrafia mikropaleontologiczna warstw granicznych kampanu i mastrychtu w Kornicy koło Białej Podlaskiej. Zeszyty Naukowe AGH, Geologia 6: 5–29.
Allman, G.J. 1856. A monograph of the freshwater Polyzoa, including all the known species, both British and Foreign. London: Ray Society.
Banta, W.C. 1968a. The body wall of cheilostome bryozoa. I. The ectocyst of Watersipora nigra (Canu and Bassler). Journal of Morphology 125 (4): 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051250407.
Banta, W.C. 1968b. The body wall of the encrusting cheilostome Watersipora nigra (Canu & Bassler) (Bryozoa) (Preliminary report). Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale in Milano 108: 93–96.
Barskov, I.S., and A.F. Weiss. 1987. O микpocтpyктype pocтpa вepxнeмeлoвыx бeлeмнитeллид (Coleoidea, Cephalopoda). [Microstructure of rostra in the Upper Cretaceous belemnitellids (Coleoidea, Cephalopoda)]. Дoклaды Aкaдeмии нayк CCCP [Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences] 294 (4): 963–965.
Berthelsen, O. 1962. Cheilostome Bryozoa in the Danian deposits of East Denmark. København: C.A. Reitzel.
Busk, G. 1852. An account of the Polyzoa, and sertularian zoophytes, collected in the voyage of the Rattlesnake, on the coasts of Australia and the Louisiade Archipelago &c. In Narrative of the Voyage of H.M.S. Rattlesnake, commanded by the late Captain Owen Stanley… 1846–1850; including discoveries and surveys in New Guinea, the Louisiade Archipelago, etc., to which is added the account of Mr E. B. Kennedy’s expedition for the exploration of the Cape York Peninsula [including Mr W. Carron’s narrative]. Vol. 1, ed. J. MacGillivray, 343–402. London: T.W. Boone.
Canu, F. 1900. Révision des bryozoaires du Crétacé figurés par d’Orbigny. II. Cheilostomata. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, série 3 28: 334–463.
Canu, F. 1913. Études morphologiques sur trois nouvelles familles de bryozoaires. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, série 4 (13): 132–147.
Carson, R.J.M. 1978. Body wall morphology of Pentapora foliacea (Ellis and Solander) (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata). Journal of Morphology 156 (1): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051560103.
Chimonides, P.J., and P.L. Cook. 1994. Notes on the genus Cranosina (Bryozoa, Cheilostomida). Zoologica Scripta 23 (1): 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.1994.tb00372.x.
Christensen, W.K., F. Schmid, and M.-G. Schulz. 2004. Belemnitella from the Upper Maastrichtian of Hemmoor, Northwest Germany. Geologisches Jahrbuch, Reihe A 157: 23–67.
Ehrenberg, C.G. 1831. Symbolæ physicæ, seu icones et descriptiones animalium evertebratorum, sepositis insectis, quae ex itineribus per Libyam, Ægyptum, Nubiam, Dongalam, Syriam, Arabiam et Habessiniam publico institutis sumptu Friderici Guilelmi Hemprich et Christiano Godofredi Ehrenberg medicinae et chirurgiae doctorum, studio annis MDCCCXX–MDCCCXXV redierunt. Berlin: G. Reimer.
Favorskaya, T.A. 1992. Mшaнки кaмпaнa и мaacтpиxтa югa CCCP [Bryozoans in the Campanian and Maastrichtian of the southern USSR]. In Aтлac pyкoвoдящиx гpyпп фayны мeзoзoя Югa и Вocтoкa CCCP [Atlas of the leading fauna groups in the Mesozoic of the southern and eastern USSR], 115–136. Caнкт-Пeтepбypг [Saint Petersburg]: Tpyды Вcecoюзного Hayчнo-иccлeдoвaтeльского Гeoлoгичecкого Инcтитyта им. A. П. Кapпинcкoгo.
Fedorov, P.V., Koromyslova, A.V., and S.O. Martha. 2017. The oldest bryozoans of Baltoscandia from the lowermost Floian (Ordovician) of north-western Russia: two new rare, small and simple species of Revalotrypidae. PalZ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-017-0351-y.
Filliozat, M. 1908. Nouveaux bryozoaires cheilostomes de la craie. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, série 4 (8): 554–560.
Georgala, D., and K. Brood. 1974. Two new bryozoan species from the Campanian of Båstad. Geologiska Föreningen i Stockholm Förhandlingar 96 (2): 203–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/11035897409454274.
Gray, J.E. 1848. List of the specimens of British animals in the collections of the British Museum. Part I. Centrionae or radiated animals. London: Trustees of the British Museum.
Hagenow, F. von. 1839. Monographie der Rügen’schen Kreide-Versteinerungen, I. Abtheilung: Phytolithen und Polyparien. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie und Petrefaktenkunde 7: 253–296.
Hagenow, F. von. 1840. Monographie der Rügen’schen Kreide-Versteinerungen, II. Abtheilung: Radiarien und Annulaten. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie und Petrefaktenkunde 8: 631–671.
Hagenow, F. von. 1851. Die Bryozoen der Maastrichter Kreidebildung. Cassel: Theodor Fischer.
Håkansson, E., and E. Thomsen. 2001. Macroevolutionary trends. Evolutionary trends in a major group of colonial animals. In Evolutionary patterns: growth, form, and tempo in the fossil record in honor of Allan Cheetham, eds. J.B.C Jackson, S. Lidgard and F.K. McKinney, 326–347. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jullien, J. 1882. Note sur une nouvelle division des bryozoaires cheilostomiens. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France 6: 271–285.
Koromyslova, A.V., S.O. Martha, and A.V. Pakhnevich. 2015. Mикpoтoмoгpaфичecкoe иccлeдoвaниe мшaнoк poдa Acoscinopleura (Coscinopleuridae) из кaмпaнa и мaacтpиxтa Eвpoпы [Micro-CT studies on the genus Acoscinopleura (Coscinopleuridae) from the Campanian and Maastrichtian of Europe]. In Coвpeмeнныe пpoблeмы пaлeoнтoлoгии. Maтepиaлы LXI ceccии Пaлeoнтoлoгическогo oбщecтвa пpи PAH (13–17 aпpeля 2015 г., Caнкт-Пeтepбypг). [Modern problems of paleontology. Materials of the LXI Session Paleontological Society at RAS (13–17 April 2015, St. Petersburg)], ed. T.N. Bogdanova, 54–56. Caнкт-Пeтepбypг [Saint Petersburg]: Poccийcкaя Aкaдeмия Hayк [Russian Academy of Sciences].
Koromyslova, A.V., and A.V. Pakhnevich. 2016. New species of Pachydermopora Gordon, 2002 and Beisselina Canu, 1913 (Bryozoa: Cheilostomida) from a Campanian erratic block (Belarus) and their micro-CT investigation. Paleontological Journal 50 (1): 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030116010044.
Levinsen, G.M.R. 1891. Polyzoa. In Det’ videnskabelige Udbytte af Kanonbaaden “Hauchs” Togter i de danske Have indenfor Skagen i Aarene 1883–86, eds. C.G.J. Petersen, and C.F. Drechsel, 243–306. København: A.F. Hoest & Soen.
Levinsen, G.M.R. 1925. Undersøgelser over Bryozoerne i den danske Kridtformation. Efter Forfatterens død udg. af K. Brünnich Nielsen og Th. Mortensen. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter/Naturvidenskabelig og Mathematisk Afdeling 7: 283–445.
Marsson, T. 1887. Die Bryozoen der weissen Schreibkreide der Insel Rügen. Paläontologische Abhandlungen 4 (1): 3–112.
Martha, S.O., B. Niebuhr, and J. Scholz. 2017. Cheilostome Bryozoen. Geologica Saxonica 62: 11–52.
Martha, S.O., B. Ruthensteiner, P.D. Taylor, and G. Hillmer. in press. Virtual examination of a new cyclostome species from the middle Santonian of Germany using micro-computed tomography. Memoir of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists.
Maryańska, T. 1969. Bryozoa from the Uppermost Maastrichtian and Palaeocene deposits of the Middle Vistula Gorge near Puławy. Prace Muzeum Ziemi 14: 85–129.
Morton, S.G. 1834. Synopsis of the organic remains of the Cretaceous group of the United States. Philadelphia: Key & Biddle.
Niebuhr, B., M. Hiss, U. Kaplan, K.-A. Tröger, S. Voigt, T. Voigt, F. Wiese, and M. Wilmsen. 2007. Lithostratigraphie der norddeutschen Oberkreide: Beitrag zur Stratigraphie von Deutschland im Auftrag der Deutschen Stratigraphischen Kommission. Hannover: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften.
d’Orbigny, A. 1852. Paléontologie française. Terrains Crétacés. Tome cinquième, contenant les bryozoaires. Paris: Victor Masson.
Reich, M., and P. Frenzel. 2002. Die Fauna und Flora der Rügener Schreibkreide (Maastrichtium, Ostsee). Archiv für Geschiebekunde 3 (2/4): 73–284.
Reuss, A.E. 1872. Die Bryozoen und Foraminiferen des unteren Quaders. In Das Elbthalgebirge in Sachsen. I. Theil: Der untere Quader, 95–144. Cassel: Theodor Fischer. [=Palaeontographica 20].
Reuss, A.E. 1874. Die Foraminiferen, Bryozoen und Ostracoden des Pläners. In Das Elbthalgebirge in Sachsen. Zweiter Theil: Der mittlere und obere Quader, 73–157. Cassel: Theodor Fischer. [=Palaeontographica 20].
Schönfelder, E. 1933. Die Kreideanhäufungen im Geschiebemergel des nördlichen Schleswig, ihre Fossilführung und geologische Bedeutung. Jahresberichte des Niedersächsischen Geologischen Vereins 25: 85–128.
Silén, L. 1981. Colony structure in Flustra foliacea (Linnaeus) (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata). Acta Zoologica 62 (4): 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.1981.tb00631.x.
Smitt, F.A. 1867. Kritisk förteckning öfver Skandinaviens Hafs-Bryozoer [Fortsättning från förra årgången p. 115, meddelad d. 11 October 1865.]. Öfversigt af Kongl. Vetenskaps-Akademiens, Förhandlingar 23 (5): 395–534.
Taylor, P.D., and F.K. McKinney. 2006. Cretaceous Bryozoa from the Campanian and Maastrichtian of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains, United States. Scripta Geologica 132: 1–346.
Veenstra, H.J. 1963. Microscopic studies of boulder clays. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Viskova, L.A., and A.V. Pakhnevich. 2010. A new boring bryozoan from the Middle Jurassic of the Moscow Region and its micro-CT research. Paleontological Journal 44 (2): 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030110020073.
Voigt, E. 1930. Morphologische und stratigraphische Untersuchungen über die Bryozoenfauna der oberen Kreide. I. Teil. Die cheilostomen Bryozoen der jüngeren Oberkreide in Nordwestdeutschland, im Baltikum und in Holland. Leopoldina: Berichte der Kaiserlich-Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher zu Halle 6: 379–579.
Voigt, E. 1956. Untersuchungen über Coscinopleura Marss. (Bryoz. foss.) und verwandte Gattungen. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologischen Staatsinstitut in Hamburg 25: 26–75.
Voigt, E. 1959. Revision der von F. v. Hagenow 1838–1850 aus der Schreibkreide von Rügen veröffentlichten Bryozoen. Geologie 8 (25): 1–80.
Voigt, E. 1979a. Vorkommen, Geschichte und Stand der Erforschung der Bryozoen des Kreidesystems in Deutschland und benachbarten Gebieten. In Aspekte der Kreide Europas, ed. J. Wiedmann, 171–210. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart.
Voigt, E. 1979b. Bryozoen der Kunrader Schichten in Süd-Limburg (Oberkreide, Ob. Maastrichtium). I. Cheilostomata. Grondboor en Hamer 2: 33–88.
Voigt, E. 1985. The Bryozoa of the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. In Bryozoa: Ordovician to Recent. Papers presented at the 6th International Conference on Bryozoa, Vienna 1983, eds. C. Nielsen, and G.P. Larwood, 329–342. Fredensborg: Olsen & Olsen.
Voigt, E. 1989. Beitrag zur Bryozoen-Fauna des sächsischen Cenomaniums. Revision von A. E. Reuss’ “Die Bryozoen des unteren Quaders” in H.B. Geinitz’ “Das Elbthalgebirge in Sachsen” (1872). I: Cheilostomata. Abhandlungen des Staatlichen Museums für Mineralogie und Geologie zu Dresden 36: 8–87.
Acknowledgements
Marie-Louise Tritz (Senckenberg Forschungs- institut und Naturmuseum, Frankfurt) and Roman A. Rakitov (Borissiak Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Science, Moscow) are thanked for providing technical assistance with sample preparation and SEM work. Andrew N. Ostrovsky (St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg), Paul D. Taylor (Natural History Museum, London), Joachim Scholz (Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum, Frankfurt) and Lena A. Viskova (Borissiak Paleontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Science, Moscow) are thanked for fruitful discussions. Dennis P. Gordon (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington), an anonymous reviewer, the handling editor Paul D. Taylor and the editor-in-chief Mike Reich (Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, München) are thanked for helpful reviews and comments on the manuscript. Financial support from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 14-05-31242-mol) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (project SCHO 581/12-1) is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling editor: Paul D. Taylor.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koromyslova, A.V., Martha, S.O. & Pakhnevich, A.V. The internal morphology of Acoscinopleura Voigt, 1956 (Cheilostomata, Bryozoa) from the Campanian–Maastrichtian of Central and Eastern Europe. PalZ 92, 241–266 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-017-0385-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-017-0385-1