Abstract
The dependence of coastal communities on mangrove forests for direct consumptive use due to the scarcity of alternate resources makes them one of the highly disturbed landscapes. This paper examines the spatial characteristics and extent of anthropogenic disturbances affecting the mangrove forests of Bhitarkanika Conservation Area situated along the east coast of India by using remotely sensed data and GIS, supplemented with socioeconomic surveys. The study reveals that resource extractions from these forests were considerable despite the protected status. Around 14% of the total fuel wood consumed annually in each of the household came from the mangrove forests of the Park. The patterns of consumption were spatially heterogeneous, controlled by the availability of alternatives, ease of accessibility, presence of markets, human density, and forest composition. The disturbance surface showed 30% of the major forest classes to be under high to very high levels of disturbance especially at easy access points. Besides, the distribution of economically useful species also determined the degree of disturbance. Resource use surfaces clearly identified the biotic pressure zones with respect to specific mangrove use and could be combined with the disturbance regime map to prioritize areas for mangrove restoration.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abdullah SA and Nakagoshi N (2007) Forest fragmentation and its correlation to human land use change in the state of Selangor, peninsular Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management 241(1–3): 39–48
Badola R (2000) Local people amidst the changing conservation ethos: Relationships between People and Protected Areas in India. In: Decentralization and Devolution of Forest Management in Asia and the Pacific, eds., T., Enters, P.B., Drust and M., Victor, Bangkok: RECOFTC Report No. 18 and RAP Publication 2000/1
Badola R and Hussain SA (2003) Valuation of Bhitarkanika Mangrove Ecosystem for Ecological Security and Sustainable Resource Use. Study Report, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun, India
Badola R and Hussain SA (2005) Valuing the storm protection function of Bhitarkanika mangrove ecosystem, India. Environmental Conservation 32(1): 85–92
Banerjee LK (1984) Vegetation of Bhitarkanika Sanctuary in Cuttack district, Orissa, India. Indian Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany 5(5): 1065–1079
Barbier EB (2006) Natural barriers to natural disasters: replanting mangroves after the tsunami. Front Ecol Environ 4(3): 124–131
Beland M, Goita K, Bonn F and Pham TTH (2006) Assessment of land-cover changes related to shrimp aquaculture using remote sensing data: a case study in the Giao Thuy District, Vietnam. Int J Remote Sens 27(8): 1491–1510
Blasco F, Aizpuru M and Gers C (2001) Depletion of the mangroves of continental Asia. Wetlands Ecology and Management 9(3): 245–256
Brosius P (2004) Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas at the World Parks Congress. Conservation Biology. 18(3): 609–612
Burrough P and McDonnell R (1998) Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press, London
Chadha S and Kar CS (1999) Bhitarkanika, Myth and Reality. Nataraj Publishers, Dehra Dun, India
Champion HG and Seth SK (1968) A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. Government of India Press, New Delhi,India
Chen R and Twilley RR (1998) A gap dynamic model of mangrove forest development along gradients of soil salinity and nutrient resources. Journal of Ecology 86(1): 37–51
Cohen MCL and Lara RJ (2003) Temporal changes of mangroves vegetation boundaries in Amazonia: application of GIS and remote sensing techniques.Wetl Ecol Manage 11(4): 223–231
Cohen WB, Spies TA, Alig RJ, Oetter DR, Maiersperger TK and Fiorella M (2002) Characterizing 23 years (1972–1995) of stand replacement disturbance in western Oregon forests with Landsat imagery Ecosystems 5(2): 122–137
Couturier S, Gastellu-Etchegorry JP, Patino P and Martin E (2009) A model-based performance test for forest classifiers on remote sensing imagery. Forest Ecology and Management 257(1): 23–37
Dahdouh-Guebas F and Koedam N (2008) Long term retrospection on mangrove development using transdisciplinary approaches: A review. Aquatic Botany 89(2): 80–92
Ewel KC, Twilley RR and Ong JE (1998a) Different kinds of mangrove forests provide different goods and services. Global Ecol Biogeogr 7: 83–94
Ewel KC, Zheng S, Pinzon ZS and Bourgeois JA (1998) Environmental effects of canopy gap formation in high rainfall mangrove forests. Biotropica 30(4): 510–519
Farnsworth EJ and Ellison AM (1997) The global conservation status of mangroves. Ambio 26(6): 328–334
Fromard F, Vega C and Proisy C (2004) Half a century of dynamic coastal change affecting mangrove shorelines of French Guiana: a case study based on remote sensing data analyses and field surveys. Mar Geol 208(2–4): 265–280
Gammage S (1997) Estimating the returns to mangrove conversion: sustainable management or short-term gain. Discussion Paper (DP97-02), presented at a workshop on Mechanisms for Financing Wise Use of Wetlands Dakar, Senegal 13 November 1998, pp. 81
Hambrey J (1996) Comparative economics of landuse options in mangroves. Aquaculture Asia 1(2): 10–14
Hardy CC, Schmidt KM, Menakis JP, Samson RN (2001) Spatial data for national fire planning and fuel management. International Journal of Wildland Fire 10(3/4): 353–372
Hemstrom MA, Korol JJ and Hann WJ (2001) Trends in terrestrial plant communities and landscape health indicate the effects of alternative management strategies in the interior Columbia River basin. Forest Ecology and Manage 153(12): 105–125
Hussain SA and Badola R (2008) Valuing mangrove ecosystem services: linking nutrient retention function of mangrove forests to enhanced agroecosystem production. Wetlands Ecology & Manage 16(6): 441–450
Kammerbauer J and Ardon C (1999) Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a typical watershed in the hillside region of central Honduras Agric Ecosyst Environ 75(1): 93–100
Kar SK and Bustard HR (1986). Status of the saltwater Crocodile (Crocodylus porosus, Schneider) in the Bhitarkanika wildlife sanctuary, Orissa, India. J of Bombay Natural History Society 86: 140–150
Karthiresan K, Murthy P and Ravikumar S (1995) Studies on root growth of a tropical mangrove tree species. International Tree Crops Journal 8(2–3): 183–188
Krause G, Bock M, Weirs S and Braun G (2004). Mapping land-cover and mangrove structures with remote sensing techniques: A contribution to a synoptic GIS in support of coastal management in North Brazil. Environmental Management 34(3): 429–440
Krishnamurthy K, Choudhury A and Untawale AG (1987). Status report, Mangroves in India, Ministry of Environment and Forests. New Delhi: Govt. of India
Lam N (1983). Spatial interpolation methods: a review. The American Cartographer 10(2): 129–149
Larson P, Freudenberger M and Wyckoff-Baird B (1998) WWF Integrated Conservation and Development Projects: Ten Lessons from the Field 1985–1996. World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C.
Lewis RR (2000) Ecologically based goal setting in mangrove forest and tidal marsh restoration in Florida. Ecol Eng 15: 191–198
McGarigal K and Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 122 p
Menon S and Bawa KS (1997) Applications of geographic information systems (GIS), remote sensing and a landscape ecology approach to biodiversity conservation in the Western Ghats. Current Science 73(2): 134–145
Miller JN, Brooks RP and Croonquist MJ (1997) Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communities. Landscape Ecology 12(3): 137–153
Millington AC, Velez-Liendo XM and Bradley AV (2003) Scale dependence in multitemporal mapping of forest fragmentation in Bolivia: implication for explaining temporal trends in landscape ecology and applications to biodiversity conservation. J Photo Rem Sens 57(4): 289–299
Mishra R (1968) Ecology Workbook. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi.
Moloney KA and Levin SA (1996) The effects of disturbance architecture on landscape-level population dynamics. Ecology 77(2): 375–394
Muttitanon W and Tripathi NK (2005). Land use/land cover changes in the coastal zone of Ban Don Bay, Thailand using Landsat TM data. Int J Remote Sens 26(11): 231–233
Nilsson C and Grelsson G (1995) The fragility of ecosystems: a review. Journal of Applied Eco 32(4): 677–692
Norussis MJ (1994) SPSS professional statistics Version 8.0. Chicago, Illinois: SPSS Inc.
NSSO (1997) Energy used by Indian Households. National Sample Survey Organization, Department of Statistics, New Delhi. Report No. 410/2
O’Neill RV, Krummel JR, Gardner RH, Sugihara G, Jackson B, DeAngelis DL, Milne BT, Turner MG, Zygmunt B, Christensen SW, Dale VH and Graham RL (1988) ndices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology. 1(3): 153–162
Opdam P, Foppen R, Reijnen R. and Schotman A (1995) The landscape ecologist approach to in bird conservation: integrating the metapopulation concept into spatial planning. Ibis 137(1): 139–146
Pandav B (1997) Birds of Bhitarkanika mangroves, Eastern India. Forktail. 12(1): 9–20
Patnaik MR, Purohit KL and Patra AK (1995). Mangrove swamps of Bhitarkanika Orissa, India — A great eco habitat for wildlife. Cheetal 34(1): 1–9
Pinto L (1987) Environmental factors influencing the occurrence of juvenile fish in the mangroves of Pagbilae, Philippines. Hydrobiologia 150(3): 283–301
Prance GT, Balee W, Boom BM and Carnerio RL (1987) Quantitative ethnobotany and the case for conservation in Amazonia. Conservation Biology 1(4): 296–310
Primavera JH and Agbayani RF (1997) Comparative strategies in community-based mangrove rehabilitation programmes in the Philippines. In: Hong PN, Ishwaran N, San HT, Tri NH, Tuan MS (eds), Proceedings of Ecotone V, Community Participation in Conservation, Sustainable Use and Rehabilitation of Mangroves in Southeast Asia, UNESCO, Japanese Man and the Biosphere National Committee and Mangrove Ecosystem Research Centre, Vietnam. pp. 229–243
Ramachandran S, Sundramoorthy S, Krishnamoorthy R, Devasenpathy J and Thanikachalam M (1998) Application of remote sensing and GIS to coastal wetland ecology of Tamil Nadu and Andaman and Nicobar group of islands with special reference to mangroves. Current Science 75(3): 236–244
Ravan SA and Roy PS (2000). Landscape level characterization of biological rich forest sitesutility of remote sensing and spatial analysis tools. Asian Journal of Geoinformatics 1(2): 11–22
Romme WH and Knight DH (1982) Landscape diversity: the concept applied to Yellowstone Park. Bioscience 32(8): 664–670
Roy PS. (1989) Mangrove vegetation stratification using Salyut 7 photographs. Geocarto International 4: 31–47
Roy PS and Behera MD (2002) Biodiversity assessment at landscape level. Tropical Ecology 43(1): 151–171
Roy PS, Padalia H, Chauhan N, Porwal MC, Gupta S, Biswas S and Jagdale R (2005). Validation of Geospatial model for Biodiversity characterisation at landscape level — a study in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Ecological Modeling 185(24): 349–369
Roy PS and Tomar S (2000). Biodiversity characterization at landscape level using Geospatial Modeling Technique. Biological Conservation 95(1): 95–109
Saenger P (2002) Mangrove Ecology, Silviculture and Conservation. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Saenger P, Hegerl EJ and Davie JDS (1983) Global Status of Mangrove Ecosystems. Commission on Ecology Papers No. 3. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN
Sayre R, Roca E and Sedaghatkish G (2000) Nature in Focus: Rapid Ecological Assessment. Washington DC: Island Press
Scott DA (1989) A Directory of Asian Wetlands. IUCN, Cambridge, U.K.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2001) Sustainable Management of Non-Timber Forest Resources. Montreal, SCBD, (CBD Technical Series no. 6), pp. 30
Selvam V (2003) Environmental classification of mangrove wetlands of India. Current Science 84(6): 757–765
Spalding M, Blasco F and Field C eds. (1997) World Mangrove Atlas. International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems, Okinawa, Japan
Spaninks F and van Beukering P (1997) Economic Valuation of Mangrove Ecosystems: Potential and Limitations. CREED Working Paper Series 14. London, UK: IIED
State of Forest Report (2001) Forest Survey of India. Ministry of Environment and Forests. Dehra Dun, Government of India
Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171–197
Valiela I, Bowen JL and York JK (2001) Mangrove forests: one of the world’s threatened major tropical environments. BioScience 51(10): 807–815
van Laake PE and Sanchez-Azofeifa GA (2004) Focus on deforestation: zooming in on hot spots in highly fragmented ecosystems in Costa Rica. Agric Ecosyst Environ 102(1): 3–15
Walters BB (2004) Local management of mangrove forests: effective conservation or efficient resource exploitation? Hum Ecol 32(2): 177–195
Walters BB, Ronnback P, Kovacs JM, Crona B, Hussain SA, Badola R, Primavera JH, Barbier E and Dahdouh-Guebas F (2008) Ethnobiology, socioeconomics and management of mangrove forests: a review. Aquatic Botany 89(2): 220–236
White PS and Pickett STA (1985) Natural disturbances and patch dynamics: an introduction. In STA Pickett and PS White (eds), 1985. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics, pp. 3–13. Academic Press, New York
Wilkie DS, Shaw E, Rotberg F, Morelli G and Auzel P (2000) Roads, development and conservation in the Congo Basin. Conservation Biology 14(6): 1614–1622
Williams M (1991) Wetlands: A Threatened Landscape. Basil Blackwell, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts
Zharikov Y, Skilleter GA, Loneragan NR, Taranto T and Cameron BE (2005). Mapping and characterizing subtropical estuarine landscapes using aerial photography and GIS for potential application in wildlife conservation and management. Biological Conservation 125(1): 87–100
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Ambastha, K.R., Hussain, S.A., Badola, R. et al. Spatial analysis of anthropogenic disturbances in mangrove forests of Bhitarkanika Conservation Area, India. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 38, 67–83 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-010-0013-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-010-0013-y