Abstract
Metal-contaminated soils are considered a global concern due to their adverse effects on ecosystem vitality. This study was conducted to assess the efficiency of garden waste biochar (GB), as a modern remediation tool of soils contaminated with heavy metals (HMs), compared with the other Paulownia biochar (PB) and bamboo biochar (BB), on the growth of Brassica juncea (L.). The experiments and analyses were carried out at the Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Guangzhou, China), during the year 2018. The studied contaminated soil sample was amended with 0, 2%, 4%, and 6% (w/w) of PB, BB, GB400, and GB600 biochar. The experiment was designed in a completely randomized block design with 3 replications for each treatment. Garden waste biochar significantly duplicated the soil organic matter and EC 1.43−2.21 and 1.33−1.51 times, respectively, enhanced soil pH, and improved plant growth. It was more efficient to improve soil properties than PB and BB. DTPA-extractable metals showed the highest reduction at 6% of GB400, which was 29.56, 46.04, and 59.98% for Pb, Cd, and Cu, respectively, while it was 48.29% for Zn at GB600 over the control. Moreover, GB treatments increased the nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) contents of the plant shoots. Besides, HM contents of soil and plant tissues were significantly reduced after biochar applications and the highest reduction was recorded using 6% of GB. The results obviously pointed out that the metal transfer coefficient (TC) of shoots was decreased compared with the control after biochar applications, and GB showed the optimum response in this regard. The huge amounts of garden waste, after transforming them to biochar (GB) which has been considered more effective in safe crop production, can be used to reduce the availability of toxic metals in the soil and keep them under safe limits, especially with large-scale vegetable crops in China. It will clean the environment and improve resource sustainability. Therefore, GB is recommended to be used in soil HM remediation on a large scale in polluted areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The contamination of heavy metals (HMs) that occurs in agricultural soils as a result of industrial activities, mining, and smelting is considered a critical worldwide environmental problem. It caused destructive disorders in plants and soils and then they move to animal and human food chains (Awad et al. 2007; Yang et al. 2017; Awad et al. 2017). In China, about 19.4% of the total farmland have been contaminated by HMs (Ministry of Environmental Protection P.R.C. and Ministry of Land and Resources P.R.C. 2014), especially in Guangdong Province since a potential health risk of HM contamination has been recorded from vegetable crops (Liang et al. 2018). For instance, Shaoguan City, which is located at north Guangdong Province, is considered a HM-contaminated city due to mining activities (Yang et al. 2003) and low soil pH of some areas that increases HM solubility to be toxic (Zhou et al. 2015).
Globally, China is the largest producer and consumer of vegetables (Yang et al. 2017). Moreover, Guangdong Province is considered the main region of vegetable production (2.55 million tons) and its residents consume more than 300 g of vegetable daily. The vegetable fields in Guangdong are often close to the industrial areas that discharge an amount of their chemical wastes (HMs) into agricultural soils (Zeng et al. 2008). Therefore, HMs negatively affect vegetable safety (Eissa 2016; Liang et al. 2018; Eissa 2019) resulted in fatal human health disorders (Moynihan et al. 2017), especially the fresh edible ones (Yang et al. 2017).
Biochar is a pivotal soil amendment used to enhance the food safety through decreasing the bioavailability of HMs via its ability to absorb and/or adsorb HMs (Reeves and Chaney 2008; Shen et al. 2014; Bian et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2016). Recent studies highlighted the benefits of biochar including carbon imprisonment, green gas alleviation, and improvement of soil properties (Xu et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2016; Lu et al. 2014; Song et al. 2014) due to its high longevity in soils (Laird 2008; Sohi 2012), especially surface area, effective organic groups, and high pH value (Wu et al. 2012), resulting in crop biomass improvement (Kaudal et al. 2015).
Bioavailability of HMs to plants depends on feedstock types and levels of biochar application as well as pyrolysis conditions (Zhang et al. 2016). Increasing the pyrolysis temperature increases the aromaticity, whereas the massiveness of oxygenated functional groups decreases (Harvey et al. 2011). Lu et al. (2014) found that the applications of rice straw biochar produced at 500 °C were more effective than bamboo biochar produced at 750 °C in decreasing the level of soil extractable copper (Cu), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn). Moreover, Song et al. (2014) postulated that the biochar of sewage-sludge, pyrolyzed at 450 °C, reduced the plant uptake of HMs compared with biochar produced at 400 °C, 500 °C, and 550 °C.
Paulownia is a high-yield woody tree naturally grown in China (Basu et al. 2015) especially P. elongata (PE) and P. fortune species (Yadav et al. 2013). However, there is little information about using Paulownia woods as biochar (PB), while bamboo biochar (BB) has been used early as a remediation tool of HMs in China (Lu et al. 2014; Liu et al. 2011; Lu et al. 2017).
Garden waste is one of the less use resources derived from the green space (defined as an area of grass, plants, or other vegetation set apart for recreation) and continually increases due to the extension of urban and green zones (MacFarlane 2009; Niinemets and Penuelas 2008). In China, 1.8 million hectares of green spaces produce 14.4 million tons of garden waste biomass (Shi et al. 2013; Sun et al. 2017). Guangdong Province is the largest producer (2.5 MT annually) of garden waste biomass in China (Shi et al. 2013). The garden waste consists of various plant portions (grass snips, hedge clips, tree clippings, wood wreckage, and falling leaves and branches) that could be of benefit for crop production. Also, the running and handling of green space consume money for labor work and agricultural operations (Boldrin 2009). The garden waste could be utilized for biochar production. It could not only save green space management costs, but also improve soil fertility, enhance plant growth, and remediates HMs in contaminated soils.
The use of garden waste as a biochar for soil amendment has so far not been investigated, whereas a few studies were only focused on its use as biofuel and energy production (Koh et al. 2008; Shi et al. 2013) or as a compost (Chen et al. 2015). Therefore, the current study aims to evaluate the efficiency of garden waste biochar (GB), produced under different pyrolysis, to alleviate HM toxicity in a contaminated soil. Effects of GB compared with those of PB and BB on improving crop production and HM uptake of Brassica juncea (L.) will be also tested.
Materials and methods
Soil and biochar
The experiments and analyses were carried out at the Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Guangzhou, China), during the year 2018 to evaluate the effects of different biochar feedstocks on the remediation of HM-contaminated soil. A sample of HM-contaminated soil (0–20 cm depth) was taken from Shaoquan City, Guangdong Province, China. The soil sample was air-dried, and sieved (5-mm mesh sieve) to be used in the pot experiment. Soil properties (e.g., pH, organic matter, and total cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu)) were determined by routine analytical methods according to Table 1.
Four biochar types were used to investigate their efficiency on bioavailability of the target metals in the studied HM-contaminated soil. Paulownia biochar (PB) and bamboo biochar (BB) were produced by Huanyu Energy Technology Co., Ltd., under 700–800 °C. However, GB was generated at 400 °C and 600 °C (GB400 and GB600) for 3 h. Each of the obtained biochar was crushed using a stainless steel mill, and their properties are listed in Table 1.
Pot experiment
Plastic pots (15 × 17 cm) were filled with 1.5 kg of the prepared soil sample amended with 0, 2% (w/w, equivalent to 31.2 t ha−1), 4% (w/w, equivalent to 62.4 t ha−1), and 6% (w/w, equivalent to 93.6 t ha−1) of PB, BB, GB400, and GB600 biochar. Also, the recommended dose of NPK mineral fertilizer was added at a rate of 100 mg kg−1, 80 mg kg−1, and 100 mg kg−1, respectively. The experiment was laid out in a completely randomized block design with 3 replicates. Based on the previous studies of Jagtap et al. (2013), Brassica juncea (L.) plants were chosen as an indicator plant for HM uptake. Five seeds were germinated in each pot, and seedlings were thinned to 2 plants per pot 2 weeks after planting. Then, the plants were left until maturity stage under the greenhouse condition (18–25 °C temperature and 60–70% humidity). The soil moisture content was kept at 7% of its water-holding capacity. Two months after planting, the plants were harvested and separated into shoots and roots, then their fresh weights were registered. Shoots and roots were washed with deionized water then dried at 65 °C for 72 h, ground, and stored for chemical analysis. The soil sample of each pot was air-dried then stirred well, sieved by a 2-mm sieve, and kept for analysis.
Transfer coefficient
The transfer coefficient (TC) of each metal was calculated in order to determine the efficiency of biochar treatments on reducing HM availability to Brassica juncea (L.). It represents the plant efficiency to take up the metal from the soil according to the proposed equation by Peijnenburg and Jager (2003) and Karami et al. (2011) as follows:
Where,
- TC:
-
is the shoot transfer coefficient,
- Cp:
-
presents the shoot metal concentration (mg kg−1), and
- Cs:
-
is the soil metal content (mg kg−1).
Chemical analysis
The soil particle size distribution was measured using the pipette method described by Jackson (1973). In stirred suspension (for 30 min) of 1:10 (w/v) biochar:water, the electrical conductivity (EC) and the reaction (pH) were measured. Soil reaction (pH) was measured in 1:2.5 (w/v) soil:water suspension, while the electrical conductivity (EC) was measured in 1:10 (w/v) soil:water extract. The total soil nitrogen (N) was estimated using the semi-micro Kjeldahl method, while the available phosphorus (P) was determined spectrophotometrically using 0.5 M NaHCO3 (Lu 1999). The total P was estimated using H2SO4–HClO4 digestion method described by Lu (1999). The soil organic matter (SOM) content was measured using the method of Walkley-Black as described by Jackson (1973). Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) was used to assess HM bioavailability (Lindsay and Norvell 1978). Total soil metal content was extracted using the digestion of soil sample with concentrated acids of HF, HNO3, and HCl (Shuman 1979). The total and DTPA-extractable Pb, Zn, and Cu were measured using the atomic absorption spectrometer (AA 800, Perkin Elmer Co., USA), while the total and extractable Cd were determined using (AS 800, Perkin Elmer, Co., USA). Plant samples were digested using nitric acid, and the metals were analyzed via the atomic absorption spectrometer (Zarcinas et al. 1987). The total plant N and P were estimated using the H2SO4–H2O2 digestion method according to Lu (1999).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range tests were used to determine the statistical significance of the biochar treatment effects using CoStat software, and p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Soil properties
Biochar applications significantly increased the SOM 1.43–2.21 times compared with the control treatment (Fig. 1a). Soil pH was significantly raised along with increasing biochar levels compared with the control treatment. The increased magnitude depended on feedstock types since significant differences were obtained among GB, BB, and PB treatments (Fig. 1b). At 6% application level, GB400 and CB600 exhibited the highest soil pH increase compared with other treatments even though there was insignificant difference of soil pH between GB400 and GB600 treatments (Fig. 1b). Except PB and GB400 treatments, biochar applications at 2% caused significant increases in EC values (1.33–1.51 times) compared with the control treatment (Fig. 1c). However, PB at all levels and GB400 at 2% significantly reduced the soil EC, and the reduction varied depending on the biochar level (Fig. 1c). In general, all tested biochar materials at any level significantly increased total soil N and P contents (Fig. 2a, b). The largest increases of total N and P were observed with the highest application level of GB while the other biochar types realized slight changes.
DTPA-extractable soil metals
The availability of HMs decreased with increasing biochar additions, and the impact was more pronounced at 6% (Fig. 3). In the untreated soil, the DTPA-extractable Cd was more than 60% of the total content which represents a large portion compared with the other metals, while the DTPA-extractable Zn was the lowest one (13.8%). However, those of Pb and Cd were more available than Zn and Cu and their symptoms appeared clearly on the plants grown in the biochar non-treated soil. Although all biochar types decreased the DTPA-extractable metals, GB pyrolyzed at 400 and 600 °C was more effective than BB and PB. The maximum reduction of the DTPA-extractable metals was observed with GB400 at 6%, which was 29.56, 46.04, and 59.98% for Pb, Cd, and Cu, respectively, over the control. Also, significant reduction of the DTPA-extractable Zn was obtained with GB600 treatment (48.29%).
Brassica juncea biomass yield, and N and P uptake
The fresh and dry biomass productions of Brassica juncea (L.) plants were significantly boosted by biochar applications (Table 2), while they were significantly reduced in the untreated soil (Table 1), and even some plants died as a result of HM toxicity. Inversely, the application of different biochar types improved the shoot and root biomass compared with the control (CK) treatment (Table 2). The highest dry biomass yield was obtained using GB400 (14.41 g pot−1) and GB600 (13.35 g pot−1) at 2%, PB (13.52 g pot−1) at 4%, and BB (5.35 g pot−1) at 6% compared with CK (0.85 g pot−1). Similarly, biochars caused a significant (p < 0.05) increase of dry root yield up to 1.73, 0.86, 2.04, and 1.70 g pot−1 by using PB at 4%, BB at 6%, and GB400 and GB600 at 2%, respectively, compared with the CK treatment (0.50 g pot−1). Although the shoot and root yields significantly (p < 0.05) increased by applying 2% of GB400 and GB600, they decreased again with increasing the applied levels up to 6%.
Applications of GB400 caused more N accumulation in the plant shoots compared with the other treatments (Fig. 4a). Increases in the N uptake resulted in N increases in the shoot dry biomass (Fig. 4b). After biochar treatments, both the shoot P content (Fig. 5a) and uptake (Fig. 5b) were significantly higher than those of the CK treatment. Maximum increases in shoot P content (81.25 and 79.54%) were recorded by applying GB600 and GB400 at 2%, respectively, while the highest shoot P content using PB treatment (59.47%) was found at the 4% application level. Furthermore, although the 4 and 6% of biochar additions were highly significant than the control, the insignificant differences were noticed among biochar types, except BB, at 4 and 6% application levels. Similarly, biochar treatments significantly increased the P uptake which was associated with the plant shoot biomass. The highest P uptake was observed by GB400 treatment followed by GB600 at 2% level. However, BB treatment exhibited P uptake increases up to 6% applied level (Fig. 5b).
Heavy metal content of plant shoots
The permissible limits of Cd, Pb, Cu, and Zn in soils according to the environmental quality standard of China (SEPA 1995) for vegetable crops are 50, 0.25, 150, and 150 mg kg−1, respectively. The tested soil retained 19, 9, and 7 times of these limits for Pb, Cd, and Zn, respectively, while the Cu was below the permissible limit. All investigated biochars significantly reduced the HM concentrations in both shoots and roots compared with non-amended soil (Table 3). Generally, HM levels of the plant roots were higher than those of the shoots. The highest reduction value of Cd concentration in the plant shoots was observed using GB400 (87.97%) at the highest application level, while the lowest one was noticed with BB (13.40%) at 2% application level. Maximum reduction values for Pb, Zn, and Cu shoot concentrations of 98.85, 98.35, and 72.16%, respectively, were recorded for GB600 applied at 6% level. On the other side, BB at 2% applied level caused the lowest reduction for Pb, Cd, Zn, and Cu concentrations in the plant shoots. Therefore, GB600 was more efficient in reducing Pb, Zn, and Cu content in the shoots than the other tested biochars, while GB400 was more effective in lowering the Cd in plant shoots.
The highest HM concentrations in shoots and roots were obtained with BB treatment, except the root Pb which was less than that of the PB indicating that BB was the least effective treatment in remediating the HMs of this soil. According to SEPA (2005), the permissible limits of Pb, Cd, Zn, and Cu in vegetables and fruits are 9, 0.1–0.2, 100, and 20 mg kg−1, respectively. The shoot and root HM contents of the plants grown in the untreated soil exceed SEPA limits except those of Cu (Table 3). However, the Pb shoot concentrations varied between 21.09 and 1.17 mg kg−1 in the plants grown in biochar-treated soils, which was lower than the SEPA limit for Pb, except in the BB-treated one. Although the biochar treatments reduced Cd in plant shoots compared with the CK, it was still higher than the permissible limit (0.1–0.2). However, Zn content was lower than its SEPA limit when the GB was added at different pyrolyzed temperatures and levels except at 2%. In addition, Cu level was under the SEPA limit in all plants grown in all biochar-treated soils. The highest relative reductions in HM contents of the edible parts (shoots) which amounted to 98.85, 98.35, and 72.16% for Pb, Zn, and Cu, respectively, were observed at 6% application level of GB600, while the highest relative reduction of Cd (87.97%) was observed at 6% of GB400.
Soil to plant metal transfer coefficient
The application of the tested biochars significantly decreased the metal transfer coefficient from the soil to the shoots compared with CK treatment. The GB400 and GB600 treatments showed the optimum response in this regard compared with the other biochars (Table 4). Generally, HMs could be ranked according to their TC values of Brassica shoots in the order of Pb < Zn < Cu < Cd. Although the least metal content in the studied soil was Cd, its TC in the control and some biochar-treated plants was higher than 1 indicating that it has higher solubility than other HMs.
Discussions
Soil properties
Compared with the other biochars, garden waste is the combination of plant origin wastes of green spaces. It is considered a valuable, rich material that contains high amounts of plant nutrients and organic matter with unique properties adequate to improving the soil fertility and increasing plant production mainly when it is used as a biochar. The GB additions positively improved OM, pH, and EC of the soil, as well as both N and P in the soil and plants (Table 1, Figs. 1 and 2). The key factor to increasing OM is the increase of biochar level regardless of their types. Consistently, Zeng et al. (2008) found that the increase of SOM remediates Cd contamination through the inhibition of Cd accumulation in the edible parts of the vegetables. Moreover, soil pH is a vital factor for HM remediation since the increase in pH promotes HM adsorption and precipitation and reduces their solubility. The results demonstrated that the level of 6% of GB was better than PB and BB biochars in raising soil pH (Fig. 1B), which directly reduced HM uptake by the plant roots and enhanced plant production (Tables 2 and 3) (Zhang et al. 2013). These findings suggest that GB is more efficient than those of PB and BB as a modern remediation tool. Furthermore, several studies proved the role of biochar in increasing the pH of acidic soils, resulting in enhancement of the adsorption as well as the complexation of metal cations, hence metal mobility reduction on biochar (Beesley and Marmiroli 2011; Ahmad et al. 2012).
The higher application of GB increased the total N and P in the soil, while this relation was unclear on PB and BB (Table 1). These findings agree with those of Mohamed et al. (2015) and Zhang et al. (2016). Moreover, the increase in the soil EC and pH after GB additions reflects their high EC and pH relative to that of the studied soil (Table 1). Although the additions of different biochar materials increased the soil EC by 1.33–1.51-fold, the obtained EC values were less to cause saline conditions. The reduction in soil salinity via biochar amendments may be due to (1) the adsorption as well as the retention of salts on biochar surfaces resulting in the reduction of salt levels in soil solution, and (2) the decrease in the upward movement of saline water that hindered surface soil salinization (Dahlawi et al. 2018).
DTPA-extractable soil metals
We found that although all types of biochar decreased the DTPA-extractable metals, GB at different pyrolysis was more effective than BB or PB, and the reduction was gradually increased with more additions of biochar. This may be due to the increase in soil pH as a result of biochar application leading to less HM phytoavailability, and/or high HM adsorption as well as a fixed complex formation with these metals, causing low mobility of HMs. These results are in agreement with those of Yang et al. (2016). They found that the extractable Cu, Pb, Zn, and Cd decreased with the increase of the rice straw biochar levels that was correlated with the rising soil pH. Furthermore, Chaney (2010) postulated that Cd in the contaminated soil remains phytoavailable due to its presence in the labile pool, and it transforms into low phytoavailable forms and reduces its plant uptake through raising the soil pH.
Plant growth, and N and P uptake
Garden waste biochar pyrolyzed at 400 °C was the superior treatment and it increased both the fresh and dry root and shoot biomass. This may be due to its rich content of nutrients. Also, low pyrolysis temperature produces more negative surface charges that strongly bind metal cations with soil particles that make it a more efficient biochar (Beesley et al. 2015). These findings were also elucidated by the results in Figs. 4 and 5, whereas GB400 accumulated more N and P in Brassica shoots. Nevertheless, the biochar application improved the growth and yield of Brassica juncea (Table 1) and supported the hypothesis that biochar applications improve crop yield in acidic soil. The enhancement impact of biochar material on the dry biomass of Brassica juncea is supported by the results of Khan et al. (2015) who found a significant high biomass production in Brassica rapa L. up to 49, 44, 29, and 22% after adding 2% of sewage sludge, rice straw, soybean straw, and peanut shell biochars, respectively.
The response of fresh and dry shoot biomass to BB biochar applications is more pronounced by increasing the application level. In contrary, both types of GB slightly decreased the fresh and dry shoot biomass with increasing application level. The slight reduction in growth as a result of adding 4 and 6% levels may be due to rising electrical conductivity values which led to salt stress on the plant and consequently reduced growth. The increase in vegetative production after the application of biochars may be attributed to their high pH value that reduces HM stress through stabilizing these metals leading to optimal conditions for plant growth. These results are in accordance with those of Yamato et al. (2006) who found a significant increase of peanut yield up to 50% after Acacia biochar additions to Indonesia soils. Also, Jeffery et al. (2011) proved a 14% increase in crop production toward biochar applications in acidic soils due to various liming effects and increasing the soil nutrient supply. The biochar application to tomato plants grown on metal-contaminated soil increased the availability of N, P, and K by 67, 54, and 43% above that of the control soil (Almaroai and Eissa 2020). The biochar application to metal-contaminated soils not only increases the growth and yield but also improves the quality of the edible parts (Eissa 2019; Almaroai and Eissa 2020). The results showed that the root biomass slightly responded to the increasing biochar application level, especially BB and GB400 since the root biomass was not affected by increasing biochar application level. The biochar applications showed no significant impacts on the N content of plant shoots except for GB treatment (Fig. 4A). An enhancement of N accumulation in shoots using the 6% of GB400 treatment may be attributed to the increase in the soil N use efficiency (Zheng et al. 2013). Moreover, the biochar treatments significantly increased the shoot concentration and uptake of P (Fig. 5A, B). The increase in shoot N and P uptakes with GB treatments may be due to their relatively higher P and N content (Table 1). Also, increasing soil phosphorus content and consequently its uptake may be attributed to rising acidity near to neutral due to biochar additives which led to precipitation of iron and aluminum oxides; thus, the phosphorus became more available as the optimum pH for phosphorus availability is about 6.8, especially in the absence of calcium ions in the acidic soils. The application of biochar realized a synergistic effect and increased availability and uptake of N and P (Al-Rohily et al. 2013; Eissa 2016; Almaroai and Eissa 2020).
Heavy metal content of plant shoots
The biochar levels play a critical role in decreasing HMs in plant tissues. The levels of GB400 and GB600 were better than those of PB or BB (Table 3). Biochar promotes mycorrhizal fungi, changes soil chemical and physical properties, increases the nutrient retention, and raises the soil pH which impact the retention and release of HMs, and provide more negatively charged surfaces (−OH and −COOH) (Karami et al. 2011; Lehmann et al. 2011; Beesley et al. 2015). The tested biochar had high pH values (Table 1) which increased soil pH (Fig. 1) that reduce the HM availability (Fig. 3). Since the HMs accumulated in roots more than in shoots, it is recommended to grow vegetables with aboveground edible parts in HM-contaminated soils, and avoiding growing those with underground edible parts. Management of metal-contaminated soils needs to find out the optimum plant species, as well as the appropriate organic amendments, which would improve soil conditions and reduce the uptake of toxic metals in the edible plant parts (Eissa 2016; Almaroai and Eissa 2020).
Furthermore, Lu et al. (2014) recorded that the feedstock type and the grain size of biochar had a critical impact on the concentration of Cd and Pb on Brassica juncea (L.). Also, they recorded 49% of Cd reduction in the plant via bamboo biochar. Biochar adsorbs HMs on its surfaces via complexing them with the dissolved organic carbon and HCO3, which reduces their mobilization and concentrations in the soil and inhibits their translocation in plants (Lucchini et al. 2014; Shen et al. 2015). Moreover, the results indicated that GB600 and GB400 treatments were more effective in reducing HMs in the plant tissues than PB and BB that pyrolized at high temperature (700–800), supporting the hypothesis that feedstock type, pyrolysis temperatures, and biochar properties have a positive effect on HM availability to Brassica juncea in acidic soils. These results are in harmony with the fact that lower temperature pyrolysis resulted in internal and external complex formations in the short term. Therefore, the higher temperature during biochar production may produce negative surface charges that should make the metal stable longer but weakly absorbed to biochar surfaces, while the lower temperature has more negative surface charges that strongly bind the metals but decreases with time (Beesley et al. 2015).
Otherwise, the levels of HMs in Brassica juncea shoots must be below the permissible limits since they are edible parts which are used as human food. Compared with SEPA (2005) limits, we found that PB, GB400, and GB600 were efficient to maintain Pb under the permissible limit. Garden waste biochar continued to show a super impact in reducing Zn below the SEPA limit especially at 4% and 6% levels, while all biochars maintained Cu below the permissible limit, but PB at 6%, GB400, and GB600 were the best. Except for Cu, all HMs exceeded the permissible limits in the non-treated soil (Table 3). Due to the fact that Brassica juncea is considered a metal hyperaccumulator plant especially for Cd (Jagtap et al. 2013), GB can reduce Cd uptake and accumulation in the aboveground parts of vegetable plants since it tends to accumulate lower and medium amounts of Cd.
Metal transfer coefficient of plant shoots
The transfer coefficient (TC) describes the total concentration of HM proportion in soil, which is transported into the edible parts of the plant. A lower metal TC value indicates lower HM plant uptake, thereby lower health risks to the consumers consequently (Karami et al. 2011). All values of TC of Brassica shoots were low after biochar application than those of the CK treatment. However, the TC of Cd in the soils treated with PB and BB at all levels was > 1 and < 1 in the CK treatment. Using 5 and 50 mg kg−1 levels of artificial Cd-contaminated soil, Mohamed et al. (2015) found that the biological concentration factor (BCF) values for Chinese cabbage and maize were > 1 in the untreated soil. The lower TC values of Zn, Cu, Cd, and Pb using GB400 and GB600 indicate that Brassica plants prevent the accumulation of these metals in their tissues confirming the effectiveness of GB in reducing the toxic metal uptake. These results are compatible with those obtained by Mohamed et al. (2015) who indicated that the applications of biochar had a higher positive efficiency in reducing HM uptake by ryegrass resulting in significant decreases in TC. Additionally, the higher TC values of Cd, resulting from adding PB and BB levels, ensure a greater ability to absorb Cd from soils. Brassica juncea is considered a higher biomass product with a high ability to accumulate HMs in its cells, especially Zn and Cd (Salt et al. 1998; Kumar et al. 1995). In addition, in pot and field experiments, Brassica juncea plants were reported to be a hyperaccumulator for cadmium, chromium, and nickel (Jagtap et al.2013). The results confirmed that about 60% of the total content of Cd was available to be taken up by root plants due to acidic conditions.
Conclusions
Biochar application showed positive significant changes regarding soil quality. Garden waste biochar (GB) caused a significant increase in the soil pH, OM, EC, total N, and total P. The investigated biochars were able to potentially in situ remediate the soil contaminated with Pb, Cd, Zn, and Cu by immobilizing these metals in the soil and reducing their uptakes by Brassica juncea. The enhancement of pH of the biochar-treated soil may contribute in reducing HM toxicity, and therefore increasing Brassica juncea growth and development. In addition, GB600 was more effective in decreasing the bioavailability of soil Pb, Cu, and Zn than the other tested biochar. GB400 was more efficient in reducing the availability of Cd. DTPA-extractable HMs decreased with increasing biochar level. Enhancing the precipitation and adsorption of HMs on the studied biochar resulted in the decrease of their solubility and bioavailability. Therefore, the efficiency of biochar in reducing the bioavailability of HMs in acidic soil was dependent not only on the biochar materials and its application level but also on the type of metal. Generally, GB was the most effective in improving the soil fertility and crop production through reducing HM availability and keeping them below the safe limits, except Cd. Further studies on the remediation of Cd by GB in other plant species using different levels are required. Moreover, the impact of biochar in the remediation of soil HMs should be studied under field conditions. Finally, the huge amounts of garden wastes along with the high levels of soil HMs in China can give a push to using garden waste biochar to solve these problems, clean the environment, and improve the resource sustainability.
References
Ahmad M, Soo Lee S, Yang JE, Ro HM, Han Lee Y, Sik Ok Y (2012) Effects of soil dilution and amendments (mussel shell, cow bone, and biochar) on Pb availability and phytotoxicity in military shooting range soil. Ecotox Environ Safe 79:225–231
Almaroai YA, Eissa MA (2020) Effect of biochar on yield and quality of tomato grown on a metal-contaminated soil. Sci Hortic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020
Al-Rohily KM, Ghoneim AM, Modaihsh AS, Mahjoub MO (2013) Phosphorus availability in calcareous soil amend with chemical phosphorus fertilizer, cattle manure compost and sludge manure. Int J Soil Sci 8:17–24. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijss.2013.17.24
Awad MYM, El-Desoky M, Abdel-Mawly S, Mohamed A (2007) Mobility of heavy metals in some contaminated Egyptian soils treated with certain organic materials. Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. Thesis, Faculty of Agric., Assiut Univ., Egypt.
Awad MYM, El-Desoky MA, Ghallab A, Abdel-Mawly SE (2017) Changes in soil Zn and Mn forms of some contaminated Egyptian soils treated with organic materials. Assiut J Agric Sci 48:269–285
Basu C, Joshee N, Gazelian T, Vaidya BN, Saditkit A, Hemmati H, Perry ZD (2015) Cross-species PCR and field studies on Paulownia elongata: a potential bioenergy crop. Bioethanol 2:12–23
Beesley L, Marmiroli M (2011) The immobilization and retention of soluble arsenic, cadmium and zinc by biochar. Environ Pollut 159:474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.016
Beesley L, Moreno-Jimenez E, Fellet G, Carrijo L, Sizmur T (2015) Biochar and heavy metals. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/40801/1/Biochar
Bian RJ, Joseph S, Cui LQ, Pan GX, Li LQ, Liu XY, Zhang A, Rutlidge H, Wong SW, Chia C, Marjo C, Gong B, Munroe P, Donne S (2014) A three-year experiment confirms continuous immobilization of cadmium and lead in contaminated paddy field with biochar amendment. J Hazard Mater 272:121–128
Boldrin A (2009) Environmental assessment of garden waste management. Technical University of Denmark, PhD thesis.
Chaney RL (2010) Cadmium and zinc. In: In: Trace elements in soils. United Kingdom Ltd, Chippenham
Chen M, Zhang LL, Li J, He XJ, Cai JC (2015) Bioaccumulation and tolerance characteristics of a submerged plant (Ceratophyllum demersum L.) exposed to toxic metal lead. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 122:313–321
Chen D, Guo H, Li R, Li L, Pan G, Chang A, Joseph S (2016) Low uptake affinity cultivars with biochar to tackle Cd-tainted rice - a field study over four rice seasons in Hunan, China. Sci. Total Environ 541:1489–1498
Dahlawi S, Naeem A, Rengel Z, Naidu R (2018) Biochar application for the remediation of salt-affected soils: challenges and opportunities. Sci Total Environ 625:320–335
Eissa MA (2016) Phosphate and organic amendments for safe production of okra from metal-contaminated soils. Agron J 108(2):540–547
Eissa MA (2019) Effect of cow manure biochar on heavy metals uptake and translocation by zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L). Arab J Geosci 12(48):1–10
Harvey OR, Herbert BE, Rhue RD (2011) Metal interactions at the biochar-water interface: energetics and structure-sorption relationships elucidated by flow adsorption microcalorimetry. Environ Sci Technol 45:5550–5556
Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs
Jagtap MN, Kulkarniand MV, Puranik PR (2013) Phytoremediation of metal contaminated soils with special reference to Brassica juncea (L.) czern, Macrotylomauniflorum lam verdc.(Dolichosbiflorus) and Medicago sativa L. Trends Biotechnol. Res 2:7–19
Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:175–187
Karami N, Clemente R, Moreno-Jimenez E, Lepp NW, Beesley L (2011) Efficiency of green waste compost and biochar soil amendments for reducing lead and copper mobility and uptake to ryegrass. J Hazard Mater 191:41–48
Kaudal BB, Chen D, Madhava DB, Downie A, Weatherley A (2015) Pyrolysis of urban waste streams: their potential use as horticultural media. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 112:105–112
Khan S, Waqas M, Fenghua Ding F, Shamshad I, Arp HPH, Li G (2015) The influence of various biochars on the bioaccessibility and bioaccumulation of PAHs and potentially toxic elements to turnips (Brassica rapa L.). J Hazard Mater 300:243–253
Koh LP, Tan HT, Sodhi NS (2008) Biofuels: waste not want not. Science 320(5882):1419–1419
Kumar PBNA, Dushenkov V, Motto H, Raskin I (1995) Phytoextraction: the use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils. Environ Sci Technol 29:1232–1238
Laird D (2008) The charcoal vision: a win–win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, and improving soil and water quality. Agron J 100:178–181
Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Kockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota – a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836
Liang H, Wu WL, Zhang YH, Zhou SJ, Long CY, Wen J, Liu N (2018) Levels, temporal trend and health risk assessment of five heavy metals in fresh vegetables marketed in Guangdong Province of China during 2014–2017. Food Control 92:107–120
Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper; Soil Sci. Soc Am J 42:421–428
Liu Y, Yang M, Wu Y, Wang H, Chen Y, Wu W (2011) Reducing CH4 and CO2 emissions from waterlogged paddy soil with biochar. J Soils Sediments 11:930–939
Lu RK (1999) Analytical methods for soil agrochemistry. Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese)
Lu, K., Yang, X., Shen, J., Robinson, B., Huang, H., Liu, D., ... & Wang, H. (2014). Effect of bamboo and rice straw biochars on the bioavailability of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn to Sedum plumbizincicola. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 191, 124-132.
Lu K, Yang X, Gielen G, Bolan N, Ok YS, Niazi NK, Liu D (2017) Effect of bamboo and rice straw biochars on the mobility and redistribution of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) in contaminated soil. J Environ Manag 186:285–292
Lucchini P, Quilliam RS, DeLuca TH, Vamerali T, Jones DL (2014) Increased bioavailability of metals in two contrasting agricultural soils treated with waste wood-derived biochar and ash. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:3230–3240
MacFarlane DW (2009) Potential availability of urban wood biomass in Michigan: implications for energy production, carbon sequestration and sustainable forest management in the U.S.A. Biomass Bioenergy 33:628–634
Ministry of Environmental Protection PRC, Ministry of Land and Resources PRC (2014) Report on soil pollution in China.
Mohamed I, Zhang GS, Li ZG, Liu Y, Chen F, Dai K (2015) Ecological restoration of an acidic Cd contaminated soil using bamboo biochar application. Ecol Eng 84:67–76
Moynihan M, Peterson KE, Cantoral A, Song PX, Jones A, Solano-González M, Meeker JD, Basu N, Téllez-Rojo MM (2017) Dietary predictors of urinary cadmium among pregnant women and children. Sci. Total Environ 575:1255–1262
Niinemets U, Penuelas J (2008) Gardening and urban landscaping: significant players in global change. Trends Plant Sci 13:60–65
Peijnenburg WJG, Jager T (2003) Monitoring approaches to assess bioaccessibility and bioavailability of metals: matrix issues. Ecotox Environ Safe 56:63–77
Reeves PG, Chaney RL (2008) Bioavailability as an issue in risk assessment and management of food cadmium: a review. Sci Total Environ 398(1-3):13–19
Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I (1998) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49:643–668
SEPA (1995) Environmental quality standard for soils. State Environmental Protection Administration, China GB:15618
SEPA (2005) The limits of pollutants in food. State Environmental Protection Administration, China, p GB2762
Shen J, Tang H, Liu J, Wang C, Li Y, Ge T, Jones DL, Wu J (2014) Contrasting effects of straw and straw-derived biochar amendments on greenhouse gas emissions within double rice cropping systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 188:264–274
Shen Z, Jin F, Wang F, McMillan O, Al-Tabbaa A (2015) Sorption of lead by Salisbury biochar produced from British broadleaf hardwood. Bioresour Technol 193:553–556
Shi Y, Ge Y, Chang J, Shao H, Tang Y (2013) Garden waste biomass for renewable and sustainable energy production in China: potential, challenges and development. Renew Sust Energ Rev 22:432–437
Shuman LM (1979) Zinc, manganese and copper in soil fraction. Soil Sci 127:10–17
Sohi S (2012) Carbon storage with benefits. Science 338:1034–1035
Song XD, Xue XY, Chen DZ, He PJ, Dai XH (2014) Application of biochar from sewage sludge to plant cultivation: influence of pyrolysis temperature and biochar-to-soil ratio on yield and heavy metal accumulation. Chemosphere 109:213–220
Sun X, Shan R, Li X, Pan J, Liu X, Deng R, Song J (2017) Characterization of 60 types of Chinese biomass waste and resultant biochars in terms of their candidacy for soil application. GCB Bioenergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12435
Wu W, Yang M, Feng Q, Mcgrouther K, Wang H, Lu H, Chen Y (2012) Chemical characterization of rice straw-derived biochar for soil amendment. BiomassBioenerg. 47:268–276
Xu CY, Hosseini-Bai S, Hao Y, Rachaputi RC, Wang H, Xu Z, Wallace H (2015) Effect of biochar amendment on yield and photosynthesis of peanut on two types of soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:6112–6125
Yadav NK, Vaidya BN, Henderson K, Lee JF, Stewart WM, Dhekney SA, Joshee N (2013) A Review of Paulownia biotechnology: a short rotation, fast growing multipurpose bioenergy tree. Am J Plant Sci 4:2070–2082
Yamato M, Okimori Y, Wibowo IF, Anshori S, Ogawa M (2006) Effects of the application of charred bark of Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea and peanut, and soil chemical properties in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52:489
Yang QW, Shu WS, Lin Z, Lin L, Zou HL, Lan CY (2003) Compound pollution and Ecological evaluation of heavy metals from mining waste water to soil rice plant system. J Agro-Environ Sci 22:385–390 (in Chinese)
Yang X, Liu J, McGrouther K, Huang H, Lu K, Guo X, He L, Lin X, Che L, Ye Z (2016) Effect of biochar on the extractability of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) and enzyme activity in soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:974–984
Yang Y, Chen W, Wang M, Li Y, Peng C (2017) Evaluating the potential health risk of toxic trace elements in vegetables: accounting for variations in soil factors. Sci. Total Environ 584:942–949
Zarcinas B, Cartwright B, Spouncer L (1987) Nitric acid digestion and multielement analysis of plant material by inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. Commun Soil Sci Plan 18:131–146
Zeng XB, Li LF, Mei XR (2008) Heavy metal content in Chinese vegetable plantation land soils and related source analysis. Agric Sci China 7:1115–1126
Zhang X, Wang H, He L, Lu K, Sarmah A, Li J, Bolan NS, Pei J, Huang H (2013) Using biochar for remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:8472–8483
Zhang G, Guo X, Zhao Z, He Q, Wang S, Zhu Y, Yan Y, Liu X, Sun K, Zhao Y, Qian T (2016) Effects of biochars on the availability of heavy metals to ryegrass in an alkaline contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 218:513–522
Zheng H, Wang Z, Deng X, Herbert S, Xing B (2013) Impacts of adding biochar on nitrogen retention and bioavailability in agricultural soil. Geoderma 206:32–39
Zhou M, Liao B, Shu W, Yang B, Lan C (2015) Pollution assessment and potential sources of heavy metals in agricultural soils around four Pb/Zn mines of Shaoguan City, China. Soil Sediment Contam Int J 24(1):76–89
Funding
This study was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFN0801300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41571313, 41401353), Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2015A030313570, 2016A030313772), Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (2016A020210034, 2017B020203002), Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou, China (201610010131), and Talented Young Scientist Program (TYSP), Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Highlights
•The influence of biochar additions to Brassica juncea grown on contaminatedsoil was tested.
• The tested biochars reduced the bioavailability and bioaccumulation of heavy metals.
• Garden waste biochar was more efficient in reducing the availability of heavy metals and improvement soil properties and plant growth.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Implications of Biochar Application to Soil Environment under Arid Conditions
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 253 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Awad, M., Moustafa-Farag, M., Wei, L. et al. Effect of garden waste biochar on the bioavailability of heavy metals and growth of Brassica juncea (L.) in a multi-contaminated soil. Arab J Geosci 13, 439 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05376-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05376-w