Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined as fat accumulation in hepatocytes more than 5% of total liver weight with the absence of excessive alcohol consumption or other causes of steatosis. NAFLD is the most common chronic liver disease in the western world and in rapidly developing countries, with estimated prevalence of 19% in the United States and of up to 32.5% worldwide.1,2 A considerable proportion of patients with NAFLD develops into progressive liver fibrosis or cirrhosis, and nearly 5% of NAFLD patients die from liver-related diseases.3

Growing evidence supports that patients with NAFLD have higher risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), such as coronary artery disease, vascular inflammation or stroke than non-NAFLD control patients.4,5 Moreover, the leading cause of death in patients with NAFLD is CVD rather than liver-associated complications,6 highlighting the significance of identifying and addressing CVD in patients with NAFLD.

Previous studies have shown a convincing association between NAFLD and cardiac abnormalities, including systolic and diastolic dysfunction, altered left ventricular (LV) geometry and epicardial adipose tissue thickness.7,8,9,10 The mechanisms of the relationship between NAFLD and cardiac complications still remain uncertain.11,12 Some studies previously demonstrated that patients with fatty liver displayed insulin resistance in myocardium,13,14 which might lead to alteration in myocardial fatty acids and glucose metabolism,15 resulting in myocardial structure abnormality and, eventually, cardiac dysfunction. Therefore, it is possible to hypothesize that patients who develop hepatic steatosis are more likely to present abnormal myocardial metabolism before the occurrence of structural or functional abnormality. Moreover, it is possible to take alteration in myocardial metabolism as an early indicator to predict the future cardiovascular events in individuals with NAFLD. However, to the best of our knowledge, there were few studies evaluating the condition of myocardial energy metabolism in patients with NAFLD. Furthermore, the precise relation between NAFLD and myocardial glucose uptake has not been properly explored.

In the present study, we thus enrolled a cohort of asymptomatic adults to investigate the association between NAFLD with alteration in myocardial glucose uptake assessed by using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET).

Materials and Methods

Patients

From December 1, 2011 to November 30, 2017, a total of 3750 consecutive asymptomatic subjects who were performed FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) for health examination at our institute were assessed retrospectively. Among this population, we exclude individuals from further analysis if they met any of the following criteria: (1) with history of alcohol intake exceeded 140 g/week; (2) had viral hepatitis B or C; (3) with history of CVD, including coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50%, myocardial infarction, heart failure or cardiovascular revascularization; (4) use of medications that might affect myocardial or hepatic glucose uptake within 6 months; (5) history of malignancy or metastasis; (6) poor qualities of PET/CT images that were unavailable for evaluation; (7) data damaged or data missed. Finally, a total of 743 subjects were included in the present study.

Clinical and Laboratory Measurements

Anthropometric data measured from all participants were height, weight, and blood pressure (BP). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height2 (m2). The age and clinical history of the participant were obtained prior to the PET examination. Positive or negative smoking habits were grouped according to they ever or never smoked before. Diabetes was defined as a fasting glucose > 126 mg/dl or taking hypoglycemic medications. Hypertension was defined as systolic BP ≥ 140 mm Hg, diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg, or use of antihypertensive medication. Laboratory tests included fasting blood glucose (FBG), total cholesterol (TC), serum triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and r-glutamy1 transferase (r-GGT).

Echocardiographic Examination

All echocardiographic images were performed at standard views using a Vivid 9 GE ultrasound systems equipped with a M5S probe (1.7 -3.4 Hz). The left atrial (LA) diameter and LV diameter were measured by the parasternal long axis, and then the left ventricular M curve was obtained. LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV posterior wall thickness (LVPWT) were measured and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and stroke volume (SV) were calculated. Early diastolic peak velocity (E) and late diastolic peak velocity (A) were measured at the apical four-chamber view. The early diastolic velocity (e′) and late diastolic velocity (a′) were measured at the mitral annulus wall, and then E/A, e′/a′ and E/e′ were calculated, respectively. Cutoff value for increased LV filling pressure is average E/e′ ratio > 14 as guided by American Society of Echocardiography.16

18F-FDG PET/CT Protocol

All patients were required to fast for at least 6 h, and the serum glucose levels were < 110 mg/dl before administration of 18F-FDG. PET images were acquired approximately 1 hour later by a hybrid PET/CT scanner (GEMINI TF 64, Philips, Netherlands) after intravenous injection of 3.7 MBq/kg of 18F-FDG. A low-dose unenhanced CT scan was performed from the skull base to the middle of thigh, with the following parameters: 120 kvp, 80 mAs, pitch of 0.829, reconstruction thickness and interval of 5.0 mm, for precise anatomical localization and attenuation correction, and was followed by a three-dimension mode PET scan which matched the CT section thickness. The PET images were obtained using the ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) method (33 subsets per iteration). All collected data were transferred into Philips Extend Brilliance Workstation (EBW) 3.0 to reconstruct PET, CT, and PET/CT fusion images, respectively.

Image Analysis

All PET and CT imaging data measurement and analysis were finished on the Philips EBW. The presence of fatty liver was confirmed on the transverse unenhanced CT images by a single radiologist with 12 years of experience who was blinded to the clinical and laboratory data. A 3-cm diameter region of interest (ROI) was drawn over the right lobe of liver on transverse CT images, avoiding any visible vessel or lesions in either image. Identical size ROI was also placed at the spleen. The mean hepatic and splenic attenuation (Hounsfield units, HU) were respectively calculated by averaging of three ROI values on different transverse sections. Fatty liver was diagnosed when the hepatic attenuation was 1 HU less than that of spleen and the attenuation ratio of liver to spleen was less than 1.0.17,18 The degree of hepatic steatosis has been previously described,19 and the same standards, including mild, moderate and severe grades, were used in the present study.

The measurement and analysis of PET images were performed by an experienced nuclear physician who was blinded to CT, echocardiographic, anthropometric, and laboratory data. For semiquantitative analysis, a volume of interest was set on the transverse PET images to identify the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) of left ventricular myocardium (SUVmyo) within an inner edge.19 We also calculated the mean SUV of liver (SUVliv) by averaging of three ROI values along the periphery of the right lobe, avoiding any obvious great vessel or local lesions. To reduce variability, the myocardium FDG uptake to the mean SUV of liver ratio (SUVratio) was calculated to estimate myocardial glucose uptake.

Statistical Analysis

Data analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics (version 23.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The independent t test was used to compare the differences between patients with and without NAFLD in continuous variables which was described as means ± standard deviations. The χ2 test was used to compare categorical data which were expressed as frequency and percentage. The differences of CT number, SUVmyo, SUVliv, and SUVratio in patients with and without NAFLD were compared by independent samples t test or Mann–Whitney U test. To assess the relationship between myocardium FDG uptake (SUVmyo) as a function of hepatic steatosis (HU), spearman correlation analysis was performed. The correlation coefficient for the correlation between these two variables was also calculated. High myocardium FDG uptake to the mean SUV of liver ratio was defined as the highest quartile of SUVratio. The trend analyses between myocardium FDG uptake (SUVratio), left ventricular diastolic function (E/e′ ratio), and fatty liver were performed by linear-by-linear association. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with NAFLD as a dependent variable was conducted to evaluate whether SUVratio quartiles were its independent factors after adjusting for clinically important factors. A P-value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

General Characteristics of Subjects

The clinical and laboratory characteristics for study population with and without NAFLD are shown in Table 1. In our sample of 743 study participants, 61.64% (458/743) were male and 38.36% (285/743) were female with an average age of 51.36 ± 11.32 years (range 27-92 years). Among them, NAFLD was present in 201 (27.05%) subjects and absent in 542 (72.95%) subjects. Although the age and incidence of smoking had no significant differences between the two groups, NAFLD patients were more likely to be men, had higher BMI, and had a significantly higher prevalence of obesity (62.69% vs. 25.09%), diabetes (15.92% vs. 7.93%), hypertension (22.39% vs. 14.94%) and metabolic syndrome (6.47% vs. 1.85%) than the subjects without NAFLD. Compared with control group, laboratory findings showed significantly higher TC, TG, LDL-C, AST, and ALT in patients with NAFLD.

Table 1 General characteristics of subjects with and without NAFLD

Echocardiographic Characteristics of Subjects

The echocardiographic characteristics for patients with and without NAFLD are illustrated in Table 2. Compared with control group, patients with NAFLD showed no significant difference in cardiac geometry, including LA diameter, LV diameter, LVESV, LVEDV, and LVPWT. Although LV systolic function reflected by LVEF and SV was similar between two groups, patients with NAFLD showed impaired LV diastolic function. The mitral E velocity and E/A ratio were significantly decreased, whereas A velocity and E/e′ ratio were obvious higher in patients with NAFLD (P all < .001).

Table 2 Echocardiographic characteristics of patients with and without NAFLD

The proportion of increased LV filling pressure (E/e′ ratio > 14) in patients with NAFLD was much higher than that of control group (19.61% vs. 4.24%). In mild, moderate and severe degree of fatty liver, the proportion of increased LV filling pressure showed a stepwise increase with the values of 9.76%, 28.85%, and 50.00%, respectively (Figure 1). When the proportion of individuals with NAFLD was stratified by quartiles of E/e′ ratio, a stepwise increase was showed with the increments of quartiles of E/e′ ratio (Figure 2). The linear-by-linear association analysis presented a strong positive relationship between liver steatosis and LV filling pressure (P < .001).

Figure 1
figure 1

The proportion of increased LV filling pressure in individuals with and without NAFLD. The proportion of increased LV filling pressure (E/e′ ratio > 14) in patients with NAFLD was much higher than that of control group (P < .001). In mild, moderate, and severe degree of fatty liver, the proportion of increased LV filling pressure showed a stepwise increase

Figure 2
figure 2

The association between liver steatosis and LV filling pressure. The proportion of individuals with NAFLD stratified by quartiles of E/e′ ratio showed a stepwise increase following the increments of quartiles of E/e′ ratio. The trend analysis presented a strong positive relationship between liver steatosis and LV filling pressure (P < .001)

Association of Myocardial FDG Uptake with NAFLD and E/e′ Ratio

The liver and myocardium FDG uptake of subjects with and without NAFLD are illustrated in Table 3. The results showed that SUVliv had no difference between patients with and without NAFLD (P = .088). However, participants with NAFLD showed significant decreases in SUVmyo and SUVratio compared with control group (P all < .001). Spearman correlation analysis exhibited a strong negative relationship between SUVmyo and hepatic steatosis (HU), with a correlation coefficient of 0.3 (P < .001).

Table 3 The liver and myocardium FDG uptake of subjects with and without NAFLD

The proportion of high SUVratio in patients without NAFLD was significantly higher than that of NAFLD patients (28.78% vs. 12.44%, P < 0.001). In mild, moderate, and severe degree of fatty liver, the proportion of high SUVratio showed a stepwise decrease with the values of 14.63%, 9.62%, and 7.69%, respectively (Figure 3). When the proportion of individuals with NAFLD was stratified by quartiles of SUVratio, a stepwise decrease was showed with the increments of quartiles of SUVratio (Figure 4). When analysis of association trend was performed, SUVratio quartiles showed correlated inversely and strongly with liver steatosis (P < .001). In addition, patients with low quartiles of SUVratio were more likely to have increased E/e′ ratio than that of patients with high quartiles of SUVratio (P < .05) (Figure 5). The association of SUVratio quartiles with E/e′ ratio quartiles showed a significant relationship (P = .027) (Figure 6).

Figure 3
figure 3

The proportion of high SUVratio in individuals with and without NAFLD. The proportion of high SUVratio in patients without NAFLD was significantly higher than that of NAFLD patients (28.78% vs. 12.44%, P < .001). In mild, moderate and severe degree of fatty liver, the proportion of high SUVratio showed a stepwise decrease

Figure 4
figure 4

The association between liver steatosis and myocardial SUVratio. The proportion of individuals with NAFLD stratified by quartiles of SUVratio showed a stepwise decrease following the increments of quartiles of SUVratio. The trend analysis presented correlated inversely and strongly relationship between liver steatosis and myocardial SUVratio (P < .001)

Figure 5
figure 5

The proportion of increased LV filling pressure in individuals stratified by quartiles of SUVratio. Patients with low quartiles of SUVratio were more likely to have higher proportion of increased LV filling pressure than that of patients with high quartiles of SUVratio (Q1 and Q2 vs. Q3 and Q4, P < .05)

Figure 6
figure 6

The association between myocardial SUVratio and E/e′ ratio. The trend analysis presented a significant relationship between myocardial SUVratio and E/e′ ratio (P = .027)

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis for NAFLD According to Quartiles of SUVratio

Multivariate logistic regression analysis with NAFLD as a dependent variable was conducted to determine whether SUVratio quartiles were its independent factors after adjusting for clinically important factors. The results are summarized in Table 4. After adjusting of age and gender, the odds ratio (OR) for NAFLD risk was 8.452 (95% CI 5.061, 14.116) in the lowest quartile (Q1) of SUVratio compared to the highest quartile (Q4). Furthermore, SUVratio quartiles were independently associated with NAFLD after adjusting for all factors including age, gender, smoking, FBG, ALT, LDL-C, BMI, obese, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, diabetes, TC, TG, and HDL-C (adjusted OR for Q1 vs. Q4 of SUVratio = 7.351, 95% CI 4.051, 13.340).

Table 4 The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis according to quartiles of SUVratio

Discussion

Our study evaluated the association between NAFLD and myocardial glucose uptake in a cohort of asymptomatic subjects. Myocardial glucose uptake was significantly lower in individuals with NAFLD compared with those without fatty liver. Furthermore, the present study demonstrated that NAFLD patients with lower myocardial glucose uptake were more likely to have higher proportion of increased LV filling pressure. This suggests that otherwise healthy subjects with NAFLD may be at risk of having impaired myocardial glucose metabolism and diastolic heart dysfunction.

In general, free fatty acids (FFA), glucose, and lactate are main energy sources for healthy heart. FDG is an analog of glucose, and thus physiological myocardial FDG uptake can be observed in normal heart. Previous studies reported that 18FDG uptake in normal heart showed variable myocardial glucose uptake because the affection of substrate metabolism, glucose load condition, and so on.20,21,22 However, there were few studies to explore the condition of myocardial glucose metabolism in patients with NAFLD. Although previous study revealed that fasting myocardial glucose uptake was markedly decreased in patients with T2 diabetes mellitus (DM),23 the relationship between NAFLD and myocardial glucose uptake still remains unclear. In order to reduce the influence of other factors on myocardial FDG uptake, we excluded patients with CVD, using related medications and with history of malignancy. In addition, we used the average FDG uptake in the liver as a background comparator to reduce variability. Although there were contradictory results about the effect of hepatic steatosis on liver FDG uptake,24,25,26 this study showed that the mean SUV of liver had no statistical difference between patients with and without NAFLD. Thus, the myocardium FDG uptake to the mean SUV of liver ratio (SUVratio) was calculated to estimate myocardial glucose uptake. Our study demonstrated that a stepwise decrease of myocardial glucose uptake was observed following the increments of degree of fatty liver. In agreement with previous study,19 the trend analysis in our study also presented a strong and inverse relationship between liver steatosis and myocardial glucose uptake.

However, the underlying mechanisms of the alteration of myocardial glucose uptake in patients with NAFLD still remain uncertain. Previous study reported that glucose was transported into cardiac myocytes by members of glucose transporters (GLUTs), mostly via insulin-sensitive GLUT4.27 It has been confirmed that patients with NAFLD are closely related to decreased insulin sensitivity at the whole body, and NAFLD is the most significant explanatory variable for myocardial insulin resistance.13 In addition, reduced insulin sensitivity is linked to impaired activity of the glucose transporter GLUT4 and increased amount of the circulating FFA.13,28 Therefore, based on the above mechanisms, impaired myocardial glucose uptake may be observed in patients with NAFLD, which is consistent with finding of the present study. In addition to impaired cardiac efficiency in insulin-resistant heart,29 decreased coronary flow reserve (CFR) was also found in patients with NAFLD in previous studies.30,31 Although the complex interplay between insulin resistant, epicardial fat-related adipokines and liver histology may be considered as common factors in promoting impaired myocardial glucose uptake and decreased CFR in NAFLD patients, its relationship still needs further study to explore. Multivariate regression analysis of this study showed that myocardial glucose uptake was independently associated with NAFLD after adjusting for clinical important factors, including age, gender, smoking, FBG, ALT, LDL-C, BMI, obese, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, diabetes, TC, TG, and HDL-C. However, limited by lacking of application software, several factors were not analyzed in this study, such as visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneous adipose tissue. Kim et al23 reported that visceral adiposity was significantly associated with the alteration of myocardial glucose uptake in patients with T2DM, but its influence on NAFLD patient needs to be confirmed by further study.

Recently, NAFLD has emerged as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, which leads to coronary artery disease, myocardial structure abnormality, cardiac dysfunction and, eventually, liver-related cardiovascular events.4,8,32,33 In fact, the pathogenic mechanisms linking NAFLD to cardiovascular complications are very complex, including the roles of genetic factors, atherosclerosis, inflammatory cytokines, insulin resistance, and so on.11,34,35 Although the cardiac geometry and LV systolic function in our study was similar between two groups, patients with NAFLD showed impaired LV diastolic function, including decreased E/A ratio and increased E/e′ ratio. Interestingly, patients with lower myocardial glucose uptake were more likely to have higher proportion of increased LV filling pressure than that of patients with higher myocardial glucose uptake. Our findings demonstrated that 12.9% of patients with low myocardial glucose uptake had increased E/A ratio, while only 6.63% had impaired diastolic heart function in patients with high myocardial glucose uptake. In patients with severe fatty liver and low myocardial glucose uptake, the proportion of LV diastolic dysfunction was even as high as 50%. Moreover, a significant relationship between myocardial SUVratio and E/e′ ratio was presented in the trend analysis. Those findings suggested that lower myocardial glucose uptake might be a possible indicator to link the strong relationship between hepatic steatosis and impaired diastolic heart function, which is considered as an independent predictor of mortality in patients with normal LV ejection fraction.36 Consistent with the results of the present study, some studies reported that patients with hepatic steatosis, as well as hepatic fibrosis were both significantly associated with LV diastolic dysfunction.19 Furthermore, those with steatohepatitis even had worsened alterations in right ventricular function compared with non-NAFLD counterparts.37 Because of the strong association of myocardial glucose uptake with NAFLD and diastolic heart function, it is important to assess the condition of myocardial glucose metabolism in patients with NAFLD for identifying those at high risk of future liver-related cardiac mortality. In addition, understanding the myocardial glucose metabolic consequences of NAFLD is important in evaluating potential mechanisms for disease progression and determining the optimal time to choose appropriate therapeutic strategies.

This study had several limitations. First, the cross-sectional study nature of present study did not allow to determine causal relationships among hepatic steatosis, myocardial glucose uptake, and heart function. Second, we did not perform liver biopsy to confirm the diagnosis of fatty liver and fatty liver grading because of the invasive nature of the procedure. However, the diagnostic criterion for fatty liver used in this study has high sensitivity and specificity according the results of previous studies.38,39,40 Third, some other factors, such as visceral adipose tissue, subcutaneous adipose tissue and FFA, were not included in the analysis. Fourth, although we tried to perform echocardiography closely to PET/CT, echocardiography was not synchronous with PET/CT. Fifth, although fasting myocardial FDG uptake was required and the serum glucose levels of individuals were under control (< 110 mg/dl) before administration of 18FDG, it was hard for us to accurately estimate the real state of myocardial insulin sensitivity. Finally, the molecular mechanisms linking NAFLD to myocardial glucose uptake did not fully investigated in this study, therefore possible related mechanisms would be explored in further studies.

New Knowledge Gained

This study demonstrates that the presence of NAFLD in otherwise healthy subjects is closely associated with decreased myocardial glucose uptake. When analysis of association trend was performed, myocardial glucose uptake showed correlated inversely and strongly with liver steatosis. Furthermore, NAFLD individuals with lower myocardial glucose uptake are more likely to have high risk of having impaired diastolic heart function. In addition, myocardial glucose uptake is independently associated with NAFLD after adjusting for clinically important factors.