Abstract
Introduction
Although several studies have shown that a simplified cardiovascular drug treatment leads to better treatment adherence, limited and conflicting findings have been reported on the separate or single-pill combination of the now recommended association between a statin and ezetimibe. We addressed this issue in a large cohort of patients newly treated with statins to whom ezetimibe was additionally administered, either separately or as a single-pill combination.
Methods
A total of 256,012 patients (age 40–80 years) from the Lombardy Region (Italy) newly treated with statins during 2011–2013 were followed until 2018 to identify those to whom ezetimibe was added. The 2881 and 5351 patients who started a two-pill or a single-pill combination, respectively, of statin and ezetimibe were identified and matched for propensity score. Adherence to drug therapy at 1 year was measured as the ratio between the number of days in which the drug was available and the days of follow-up (the proportion of days covered; PDC). Patients who had a PDC > 75% or < 25% were, respectively, defined as highly and poorly adherent to drug therapy. Analysis was extended to the association between adherence and the risk of fatal/non-fatal cardiovascular events.
Results
Compared to those prescribed a two-pill combination, those prescribed a single-pill combination had an 87% (75–99%) greater odds of being highly adherent and a 79% (72–84%) lower odds of being poorly adherent to treatment. These advantages were manifest in all strata of age, sex, and clinical profile. The risk of cardiovascular outcomes decreased by 55% in patients with high adherence compared to those with low adherence.
Conclusion
Patients who were prescribed a single-pill combination of statin/ezetimibe more frequently exhibit a good adherence and less frequently bad adherence to treatment than those prescribed a two-pill combination of these drugs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Why carry out this study? |
Medication adherence is low in clinical practice and is associated with greater risk for adverse outcomes. The use of a single-pill combination of two drugs has been shown to improve medication adherence for antihypertensive drug treatment. |
We sought to investigate the adherence to lipid-lowering therapy in a large cohort of patients newly treated with statins comparing those who added ezetimibe separately and those who switched to the single-pill combination of the two drugs. |
What was learned from the study? |
Compared to those prescribed a two-pill combination of statin and ezetimibe, those prescribed a single-pill combination had an 87% (confidence interval 75–99%) greater odds of being highly adherent and a 79% (72–84%) lower odds of being poorly adherent to treatment. |
The present study suggests that the single-pill formulation of statin and ezetimibe improves adherence and persistence to lipid-lowering drug therapy at all ages and at different levels of cardiovascular risk. This offers robust support to use this combination in patients who are not at lipid-lowering drugs–cholesterol target with statin alone. |
Introduction
Poor adherence to lipid-lowering drugs is a major challenge for the treatment of dyslipidemia because the number of patients who fail to take the prescribed drugs is high, and this leads to an insufficient control of the lipid profile [1], as well as to an increased risk of hospitalization and death [2,3,4,5].
There is general agreement that an effective way to improve adherence to treatment is treatment simplification, i.e., reduction of the number of tablets to be taken daily [6]. This has been consistently found for antihypertensive drug treatment, for which adherence has been reported to be better when two blood pressure-lowering drugs are given in a single pill rather than separately [7]. Such evidence, however, is not equally clear for single-pill combination of two lipid-lowering drugs such as a statin and ezetimibe. A higher adherence to treatment among patients receiving a single-pill combination of two lipid-lowering drugs has been reported in one study [8], whereas no difference in adherence between single-pill and two-pill combinations has been reported in another study [9].
The European guidelines on dyslipidemia issued in 2016 [10] recommended reducing an abnormal lipid profile to the desired target first by using statin monotherapy up to a maximal dose within the therapeutic range and then to add ezetimibe to a previous ineffective or only partially effective statin treatment. Public European healthcare systems have strengthened this recommendation in more recent lipid guidelines [11], which has given further support to the use of dual drug treatment to achieve lipid control, and has made the statin/ezetimibe combination reimbursable.
The aim of our study was to assess adherence and persistence to lipid-lowering treatment with a statin and ezetimibe prescribed separately or in a single-pill formulation. Data were collected in a large cohort of patients from the Lombardy region who were newly treated with a statin and in whom ezetimibe was added to their initial treatment, either separately or in a single-pill combination. The analysis was extended to the incidence of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for cardiovascular events in the two groups to see whether different levels of adherence resulted into differences in the risk of clinical outcomes.
Methods
Data Source
Data were retrieved from the healthcare utilization databases of Lombardy, a region of Italy that accounts for about 16% (more than 10 million) of its population. The Italian population is covered by the National Health Service (NHS), and in Lombardy this has been associated for about 20 years with an automated system of databases to collect a variety of information, including: (1) an archive of residents who receive NHS assistance (the whole resident population) reporting demographic and administrative data, other than the dates in which the individual started (birth or immigration into the region) or stopped (death or emigration) to be a NHS beneficiary; (2) hospitalization (primary diagnosis, coexisting conditions, and procedures); and (3) outpatient prescriptions of all the drugs reimbursed by the NHS, including statins and ezetimibe.
Because a unique identification code was used for all the databases, their linkage allowed the identification of the complete care pathway of NHS beneficiaries. To preserve privacy, each identification code was automatically anonymized, the inverse process being only allowed by the Regional Authority upon request of judicial Authorities. Details on healthcare utilization databases of the Lombardy region in the field of pharmaco-epidemiology have been reported in previous studies [12,13,14].
The authors of the present manuscript were allowed access to these databases through an agreement with Lombardy Region for the current study (‘Ricerca Finalizzata 2016’, NET- 2016-02363853. According to the rules from the Italian Medicines Agency (available at: http://www.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/sites/default/files/det_20marzo2008.pdf), retrospective studies using administrative databases do not require Ethics Committee protocol approval. No identifiable information was made available to the authors.
Cohort Selection and Follow-Up
The target population included Lombardy residents, aged 40–80 years, who were beneficiaries of the NHS. Of these, those who were prescribed a statin during 2011–2013 were identified, and the date of the first dispensation was defined as the index statin prescription date. To ensure the inclusion of new users of a statin [15], patients who had received a statin prescription within 5 years before the index prescription were excluded. The included patients were followed until the earliest date among death, emigration, or December 31, 2018 to identify those adding ezetimibe to statin either separately or in a single-pill combination. The date of the first dispensation of the two lipid-lowering drugs was defined as the index combination prescription date. Among these patients, we excluded those (1) with less than 1 year of follow-up (patients who died and those who moved to other regions), and (2) who received only one statin/ezetimibe prescription during the first year after the index combination prescription date. The remaining patients were included into the final cohort, and the cohort members were followed from the index combination prescription date for 365 days. This follow-up duration was selected because previous studies have shown that the largest fraction of treatment discontinuation occurs during the first year of treatment [16, 17]. A detailed description of the cohort selection is shown in Supplementary Figure S1.
Adherence To and Discontinuation of Lipid-Lowering Treatment
All lipid-lowering drugs dispensed to each cohort member during the 1-year follow-up were identified. The period covered by any single prescription was calculated from the number of tablets in the dispensed canisters, assuming a treatment schedule of one tablet per day [17]. For overlapping prescriptions, a patient was assumed to have completed the former prescription before starting the second one.
Adherence to therapy was assessed as the cumulative number of days covered by the lipid-lowering drug therapy divided by the number of days of follow-up, a quantity referred to as “proportion of days covered” by prescriptions (PDC) [18]. Three categories of adherence were considered: low (< 25%), intermediate (25–75%), and high (> 75%) PDC values. These cut-off values were chosen because, in previous studies on the Lombardy database, these adherence levels to statin drug treatment showed a clear association with a reduction (PDC > 75%) and an increase (PDC < 25%) of cardiovascular outcomes and mortality [13, 14]. The primary goal of the study was to compare the patients’ odds of being highly adherent to treatment, i.e., to have a PDC > 75%, in the single-pill versus the two-pill combination group. Secondary aims were to compare the two groups for the odds of being poorly adherent (i.e., to have a PDC < 25%) as well as to assess treatment discontinuation. The latter measure extended information on adherence to persistence on treatment. Starting from the index combination prescription date, consecutively refilled prescriptions were considered uninterrupted, i.e., treatment to be persistent, if the time-span between the end of one prescription and the beginning of the following one was less than 90 days; if the between-prescription timespan was longer, treatment discontinuation was assumed [19].
Covariates
Additional data included: (1) age and gender, (2) duration of and adherence to statin therapy, (3) potency of statin at the index statin prescription date, (4) previous use of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular drugs, and (5) previous hospitalization(s) for cardiovascular events, diabetes, kidney diseases, respiratory diseases, and cancer. In addition, the number of co-medications dispensed in the year prior to the index statin prescription date was assessed and categorized as 0–4, 5–9, and ≥ 10. Furthermore, the clinical profile was assessed by the Multisource Comorbidity Score, a prognostic score that has been shown to predict all-cause death and hospitalization of Italian people more precisely than other widely used scores [20]. Three categories of clinical profile were considered: good (0 ≤ score ≤ 4), intermediate (5 ≤ score ≤ 14), and poor (score ≥ 15).
Clinical Outcomes
Details on the assessment of mortality and hospitalization for cardiovascular outcomes in the health utilization database of Lombardy are provided in previous studies [13, 14]. In the present study, the outcome of interest was the composite cardiovascular mortality (i.e., death from ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and heart failure) and hospitalizations in which stroke, myocardial infarction, or heart failure were listed by their appropriate codes as the primary diagnosis. The clinical outcomes data were collected after the assessment of drug adherence, i.e., from 1 year after the index combination prescription date until censoring (the earliest among emigration or data availability, i.e., December 31, 2019). The median follow-up during which clinical outcomes were assessed was 2.2 years.
Data Analysis
Members of the final cohort were classified by the treatment strategy, i.e., whether a two-pill or single-pill combination statin/ezetimibe was dispensed at the index combination prescription date, according to the intention-to-treat-approach.
To mitigate the potential confounding effect of a different clinical profile between groups, a 1:1 propensity-score matching design was adopted [21]. The propensity to be prescribed a single-pill combination was derived through a logistic regression model, which includes the above-mentioned covariates. For each patient treated with a single-pill combination, one patient who received a two-pill combination was randomly selected from the cohort to be matched for propensity score using a nearest-neighbor matching algorithm without replacement [22]. Comparisons between groups for continuous variables were performed with the t test and ANOVA, whereas the chi-square test was calculated for categorical variables. In addition, to compare clinical characteristics and adherence to treatment between groups, standardized mean differences were also used. Equipoise was considered to be reached when the between-group comparison of covariates had a mean standardized difference of < 0.1 [23]. Finally, log-binomial regression models were fitted to estimate the risk ratio, and its 95% confidence interval (CI), of treatment adherence and persistence in relation to drug strategy, using the two-pill combination as reference.
To assess the association between drug adherence and the composite outcome (mortality and hospitalization for cardiovascular events), a Cox model was fitted to estimate the hazard ratio and its 95% CI. To account for its possible change over time, adherence was inserted in the model as a time-dependent variable. Adjustments were made for sex, age, number of co-treatments, hospitalization for cardiovascular disease, and the clinical status as assessed by the Multisource Comorbidity Score. Analysis was extended to the association between the drug treatment strategy (single pill or separately administered drug statin and ezetimibe combination) to determine the effect of the drug treatment strategy per se on the outcome onset.
Sensitivity Analyses
To verify the robustness of our findings, three sensitivity analyses were performed. First, to estimate the association between treatment strategy and drug adherence over a longer time-window, the adherence-related analysis was repeated by selecting patients who had at least 2 years of follow-up. Second, because the prescribed drug doses are not recorded in our database, the hypothesis was made that patients separately adding ezetimibe to statin might reduce the daily drug dosage, making the duration of the prescription greater and thus adherence to treatment higher than the one estimated by our method. To verify the possibility that between-group differences in treatment adherence between patients on single-pill and two-pill combinations might be explained by differences in drug doses, we increased the coverage of each prescription up to 3 times in patients who received two-pill combinations.
Third, because administrative databases suffer from lack of important clinical information, the potential bias associated with unmeasured confounders was investigated by the rule-out approach [24] to estimate the extension of the overall confounding required to fully account for the exposure–outcome association. We set the possible unmeasured confounder: (1) to have a 30% prevalence in the study population, (2) to increase the propensity of high adherence up to ten-fold, and (3) to reduce the risk of low adherence up to 50-fold more in patients exposed than in those unexposed to the confounder.
Results
Patients
The distribution of the exclusion criteria is shown in Fig. 1. Of the 848,103 patients aged 40–80 years who had statin prescriptions during 2011–2013, 256,012 were incident users. Among these: (1) 4116 and 8713 patients, respectively, made use of two-pill and single-pill combinations of statin and ezetimibe; (2) 2881 and 5351 met the inclusion criteria; and (3) 2129 matched couples were included in the final cohort.
The baseline characteristics of the included patients are shown in Table 1. Compared with patients on two-pill combinations, those treated with a single-pill combination were more frequently female, less adherent to statin monotherapy, less often treated with high-potency statin, antihypertensive and antithrombotic agents, and with an overall lower number of prescribed drugs. Cardiovascular disease was less common in the single-pill combination group, which showed a slightly better clinical profile in the Multisource Comorbidity Score. After propensity-score matching, there was no evidence that demographic, clinical, or therapeutic baseline features differed between the two groups.
Among patients on a two-pill combination, 57% made use of atorvastatin, 32% of rosuvastatin, and 5% of simvastatin (Supplementary Table S1). 94% of patients in the single-pill combination group used the simvastatin/ezetimibe combination, and only 6% used the rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination.
Adherence To and Discontinuation of Lipid-Lowering Treatment
Among patients on a two-pill combination, 756 (35.5%), 1,102 (51.8%), and 271 (12.7%) exhibited high, intermediate, and low adherence, respectively. The corresponding figures for patients under a single-pill combination were 1,451 (68.2%), 621 (29.2%), and 57 (2.7%), the between-group differences being always statistically significant (standardized difference: 0.727). Adherence to lipid-lowering drug therapy was higher among patients on single-pill combination irrespectively of age, gender, and clinical profile (Fig. 2).
Figure 3 shows that, compared to those prescribed a two-pill combination of statin and ezetimibe, patients on a single-pill combination had a greater chance of being highly adherent to treatment (1.87, 95% CI: 1.75–1.99). This was the case in all strata of age, both sexes, and in patients with different clinical statuses. It was also the case for both single-pill combinations available in Italy, i.e., compared to patients prescribed a two-pill combination, the odds of being highly adherent to treatment increased with the single-pill combination of simvastatin/ezetimibe (1.84, 1.72–1.96) as well as of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe (2.47, 2.31–2.65).
As shown in Fig. 4, the effect of single-pill vs. two-pill combination for the odds of being poorly adherent to treatment were specular to those obtained for the odds of being highly adherent to treatment i.e., compared to the two-pill combination, the single-pill combination reduced the propensity of being low adherent by 83% (0.21, 0.16–0.28), this being the case in all age strata, both sexes and all clinical profiles. No analysis of the effect of the two single-pill combinations (simvastatin/ezetimibe and rosuvastatin/ezetimibe) was performed because of the low statistical potency of the sample size.
Figure 5 shows the results obtained on treatment discontinuation. Compared to patients on two-pill combinations, treatment discontinuation was lower among patients under single-pill combination (25.2% vs. 46.7%, standardized difference: 0.460). From the risk ratio estimation, patients under single-pill combination had a lower risk of treatment discontinuation than those on two-pill combination (0.72, 0.69–0.76), irrespectively from gender, age, clinical profile, and different single-pill combination type (simvastatin/ezetimibe: 0.74, 0.70–0.77; rosuvastatin/ezetimibe: 0.63, 0.58–0.67).
Adherence to Lipid-Lowering Treatment and Clinical Outcomes
The characteristics of cohort members according to the categories of adherence and drug treatment strategy in relation to the risk of clinical outcomes are reported in Supplementary Table S1. Overall, adherent patients were more frequently male and younger (two-pill combination group). They also more often exhibited previous hospitalization for cardiovascular disease and were more often treated with a high-potency statin, antihypertensive agents, or antithrombotic agents.
The cohort members accumulated 9430 person-years of observation (on average, 2.2 years per patient) and generated 208 outcomes (52 deaths and 156 hospitalizations). There were 222 outcomes every 10,000 person-years among patients on two-pill combinations, and 219 outcomes every 10,000 person-years among those under a single-pill combination. The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization) was not significantly different in patients on two-drug combinations exhibiting low, intermediate, and high adherence to treatment, while, in patients under single-pill combinations, clinical outcomes showed a reduction when adherence was intermediate (− 17%) or high (− 42%) compared to its low level. As shown in Fig. 6, according to the Cox model, there was a clear trend toward a progressive reduction of the adjusted risk of composite outcome as adherence with drug therapy increased, i.e., compared with low adherence, patients with intermediate and high adherence showed an adjusted risk reduction of 41% (95% CI, − 6 to 67%) and 55% (20–75%), respectively. There was no evidence that drug treatment strategy affected the composite outcome (hazard ratio: 0.98, 0.73–1.32) after adjusting for drug adherence.
Sensitivity Analyses
Adherence to lipid-lowering drug therapy was still greater among patients prescribed a single-pill combination after 2 years of follow-up. Among patients on two-pill combinations, 35.8% and 22.1%, showed a high and low adherence, respectively, the corresponding figures among patients prescribed a single-pill combination being 65.9% and 9.3% (standardized difference: 0.640). The risk of treatment discontinuation was also lower in the single-pill than in the two-pill combination group (31.3% vs. 54.4%, standardized difference: 0.480).
Supplementary Figure S2 shows that patients on a two-pill combination should have reduced the daily dosage at least 2.5 times to nullify the observed between-group difference in treatment adherence with the single-pill combination.
Supplementary Figure S3, left panel, shows that an unmeasured confounder should (1) have increased at least four-fold the propensity of being highly adherent to treatment, and (2) been at least four-fold less prevalent in patients under two-pill combination, to account for the effect of single-pill combination on high adherence to treatment. Stronger confounder–outcome and exposure–outcome associations are required for moving to the null the effect of single-pill combination on low adherence to treatment (Supplementary Figure S3, right panel), as well as to account for the single-pill-related benefits in different demographic and clinical conditions.
Discussion
The present real-world investigation of a cohort of patients treated with statins and the addition of ezetimibe confirms previous observations that in the real-life setting adherence with and persistence of lipid-lowering drug treatment is low [14, 17, 25]. Our study, however, provides several new findings. First, the propensity of being highly adherent to lipid-lowering drug therapy was more common in patients prescribed a single-pill combination of statin and ezetimibe than in those in whom ezetimibe was added separately from the statin administration. Second, the single-pill combination treatment strategy reduced the risk of patients to be poorly adherent as well as to discontinue lipid-lowering treatment. Third, the above advantages were by no means quantitatively marginal and were seen regardless of the patients’ sex, age, and clinical profile, the improvement in adherence being especially marked in some of these subgroups. For example, the single-pill combination conferred a 82% and 102% increase in the propensity to be highly adherent among men and women, respectively, the increase being 124% in patients with a poor clinical profile, and 112% among patients older than 65 years. In the entire cohort and in subgroups, the improvements were even more marked for the risk of being poorly adherent or experiencing treatment discontinuation, which means that single-pill combinations of two lipid-lowering agents can substantially help in making a two-drug lipid-lowering treatment much more regular and persistent. Finally, and most importantly, in the patients of the present study, the risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events showed a reduction as adherence to lipid-lowering treatment increased from low to intermediate and high. This confirms previous observations on the protective effect of high adherence to lipid-lowering treatment by a number of studies, including those from our healthcare database [4, 14, 26,27,28], which have also demonstrated the protective effect of persistence on treatment, because stopping cardiovascular protective medicines is associated with a marked increase of adverse outcomes [29]. In this context, however, our present data provide two other observations. First, in patients with high adherence, the risk of outcomes was 55% less than in those with low adherence, which emphasizes the paramount importance of adherence to treatment for protection of dyslipidemic patients. Second, there was no difference in outcomes between the single- and separate-pill treatment strategies when data were adjusted for adherence, which suggests that the difference in adherence between the two groups played a major role. This offers robust support to use the single-pill combination of statin and ezetimibe in patients who are not at LDL-cholesterol target in people with different cardiovascular risk levels [11] as recently recommended [30].
Three other findings of our study deserve to be mentioned. First, an improvement of adherence to treatment associated with single-pill dual lipid-lowering combinations was observed also during a longer follow-up (2 years), which allows to conclude that the benefit of this therapeutic approach is long lasting. Second, 5351 out of the 8232 (65%) patients who added ezetimibe to the statin therapy adopted the single-pill strategy, which shows that in a real-life setting a single-pill combination is the favorite treatment strategy when two lipid-lowering drugs are required. Third, although both single-pill combinations available in the Italian market were associated with an improved adherence to treatment, the improvement was greater with the rosuvastatin/ezetimibe than with the simvastatin/ezetimibe single-pill combination. However, this comparison was based on a more limited number of patients and, because of the more recent availability of the rosuvastatin /ezetimibe combination, the size of the two groups was imbalanced, which makes further studies necessary before concluding that the rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination is superior to the simvastatin/ezetimibe combination.
Our study has strengths and limitations. The strengths are that the study was based on a large and unselected population exposed to real-life medical practice, which was made possible because the Italian healthcare system is cost-free and involves virtually all citizens [13, 14, 16, 20]. For studies on adherence to treatment, this approach first represents an important advantage because the patients’ behavioral modifications induced by the awareness of being under observation typical of trials and many observational studies are avoided [31]. Second, the drug prescription database provides highly accurate data because pharmacists are required to report prescriptions in detail to obtain reimbursement, and incorrect reports about the dispensed drugs have legal consequences [32]. Third, patients were “recruited” at the time of their initial lipid-lowering therapy, a “new-user” approach that reduced the potential for selection bias [15]. Finally, the robustness of our main findings was confirmed by the sensitivity analyses.
The weaknesses, on the other hand, are that over-the-counter medicines were not recorded in our database, and that we were able to measure drug prescription but not drug consumption [12]. First, because our database did not include the prescribed daily doses, we had to assume that patients were under a treatment schedule of one tablet per day. If patients under two-pill combinations used lower doses of the drugs, their adherence to treatment would be greater than the one estimated by our method. However, one of our sensitivity analyses shows that only a strong unrealistic between-group imbalance in the daily drug dosage would have nullified the favorable effect of single-pill combination on adherence to treatment. Second, because in more than half of the patients on a two-pill combination the statin prescribed was different from that of the single-pill combination (e.g., atorvastatin rather than simvastatin or rosuvastatin), our findings might be affected by differences among individual statins [33]. Finally, like other administrative databases, the Lombardy administrative database does not include some important clinical data (e.g., lipid profile, blood pressure, blood glucose), which means that our study’s findings cannot entirely exclude confounding. However, a sensitivity analysis showed that the association of the simplified lipid-lowering treatment with drug adherence could only be eliminated by an unmeasured residual confounder of large and unrealistic dimensions. In addition, our results offer evidence that the use of the single-pill statin/ezetimibe combination was associated with what represents the major goal of treatment, i.e. patient protection. Improved adherence was the major responsible factor because correction for adherence entirely eliminated the protective effect of the simplified lipid-lowering treatment.
Conclusions
In our real-life cohort of patients the single-pill combination of statin and ezetimibe substantially improved adherence to drug therapy compared to the corresponding two-pill combination of the two drugs. Confirming previous findings on the protective effect of adherence to lipid-lowering treatment, an improvement in adherence was associated with a reduction in the risk of fatal/non-fatal cardiovascular events. Thus, via an improvement of adherence, single-pill combination of statin and ezetimibe may improve cardiovascular protection in people in whom dyslipidaemia makes two-drug lipid-lowering treatment necessary.
References
Guglielmi V, Bellia A, Pecchioli S, et al. Effectiveness of adherence to lipid-lowering therapy on LDL-cholesterol in patients with very high cardiovascular risk: a real-world evidence study in primary care. Atherosclerosis. 2017;263:36–41.
Stamler J, Daviglus ML, Garside DB, Dyer AR, Greenland P, Neaton JD. Relationship of baseline serum cholesterol levels in 3 large cohorts of younger men to long-term coronary, cardiovascular, and all-cause mortality and to longevity. JAMA. 2000;284:311–8.
Cui R, Iso H, Toyoshima H, et al.; JACC Study Group. Serum total cholesterol levels and risk of mortality from stroke and coronary heart disease in Japanese: the JACC study. Atherosclerosis. 2007;194:415–20.
Corrao G, Conti V, Merlino L, Catapano AL, Mancia G. Results of a retrospective database analysis of adherence to statin therapy and risk of nonfatal ischemic heart disease in daily clinical practice in Italy. Clin Ther. 2010;32:300–10.
Rannanheimo PK, Tiittanen P, Hartikainen J, et al. Impact of statin adherence on cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a population-based cohort study in Finland. Value Health. 2015;18:896–905.
Du LP, Cheng ZW, Zhang YX, Li Y, Mei D. The impact of fixed-dose combination versus free-equivalent combination therapies on adherence for hypertension: a meta-analysis. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018;20:902–7.
Tsioufis K, Kreutz R, Sykara G, van Vugt J, Hassan T. Impact of single-pill combination therapy on adherence, blood pressure control, and clinical outcomes: a rapid evidence assessment of recent literature. J Hypertens. 2020;38:1016–28.
Kamat SA, Bullano MF, Chang CL, Gandhi SK, Cziraky MJ. Adherence to single-pill combination versus multiple-pill combination lipid-modifying therapy among patients with mixed dyslipidemia in a managed care population. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27:961–8.
Bartlett LE, Pratt N, Roughead EE. Does tablet formulation alone improve adherence and persistence: a comparison of ezetimibe fixed dose combination versus ezetimibe separate pill combination? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83:202–10.
Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2999–3058.
Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:111–88.
Corrao G, Mancia G. Generating evidence from computerized healthcare utilization databases. Hypertension. 2015;65:490–8.
Rea F, Mancia G, Corrao G. Statin treatment reduces the risk of death among elderly frail patients: evidence from a large population-based cohort. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa126.
Corrao G, Monzio Compagnoni M, Franchi M, et al. Good adherence to therapy with statins reduces the risk of adverse clinical outcomes even among very elderly. Evidence from an Italian real-life investigation. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;47:25–31.
Ray WA. Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:915–20.
Corrao G, Zambon A, Parodi A, et al. Discontinuation of and changes in drug therapy for hypertension among newly-treated patients: a population-based study in Italy. J Hypertens. 2008;26:819–24.
Helin-Salmivaara A, Lavikainen P, Korhonen MJ, et al. Long-term persistence with statin therapy: a nationwide register study in Finland. Clin Ther. 2008;30(Pt 2):2228–40.
Andrade SE, Kahler KH, Frech F, Chan KA. Methods for evaluation of medication adherence and persistence using automated databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006;15:565–74.
Cramer JA, Roy A, Burrell A, et al. Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions. Value Health. 2008;11:44–7.
Corrao G, Rea F, Di Martino M, et al. Developing and validating a novel multisource comorbidity score from administrative data: a large population-based cohort study from Italy. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e019503.
Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46:399–424.
Rassen JA, Glynn RJ, Brookhart MA, Schneeweiss S. Covariate selection in high-dimensional propensity score analyses of treatment effects in small samples. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:1404–13.
Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28:3083–107.
Schneeweiss S. Sensitivity analysis and external adjustment for unmeasured confounders in epidemiologic database studies of therapeutics. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006;15:291–303.
Umeda T, Hayashi A, Fujimoto G, Piao Y, Matsui N, Tokita S. Medication adherence/persistence and demographics of Japanese dyslipidemia patients on statin-ezetimibe as a separate pill combination lipid-lowering therapy—an observational pharmacy claims database study. Circ J. 2019;83:1689–97.
Khunti K, Danese MD, Kutikova L, et al. Association of a combined measure of adherence and treatment intensity with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atherosclerosis or other cardiovascular risk factors Trea. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:e185554.
Chowdhury R, Khan H, Heydon E, et al. Adherence to cardiovascular therapy: a meta-analysis of prevalence and clinical consequences. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2940–8.
Martin-Ruiz E, Olry-de-Labry-Lima A, Ocaña-Riola R, Epstein D. Systematic review of the effect of adherence to statin treatment on critical cardiovascular events and mortality in primary prevention. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018;23:200–15.
Giral P, Neumann A, Weill A, Coste J. Cardiovascular effect of discontinuing statins for primary prevention at the age of 75 years: a nationwide population-based cohort study in France. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:3516–25.
Drexel H, Coats AJS, Spoletini I, et al. ESC position paper on statins adherence and implementation of new lipid-lowering medications: barriers to be overcome. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020;6:115–21.
van Onzenoort HA, Menger FE, Neef C, et al. Participation in a clinical trial enhances adherence and persistence to treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Hypertension. 2011;58:573–8.
Strom BL. Overview of automated databases in pharmacoepidemiology. In: Strom BL, editor. Pharmacoepidemiology. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2000. p. 219–22.
Hope HF, Binkley GM, Fenton S, Kitas GD, Verstappen SMM, Symmons DPM. Systematic review of the predictors of statin adherence for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0201196.
Acknowledgements
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Milano - Bicocca within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This study was supported by grants from the Italian Ministry of the Education, University and Research (’Fondo d’Ateneo per la Ricerca’ portion, year 2019), and from the Italian Ministry of Health (‘Ricerca Finalizzata 2016’, NET- 2016-02363853). The funding sources had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, or the decision to approve publication of the finished manuscript. Institutional funds supported the journal’s rapid service fee.
Authorship
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.
Authors’ Contributions
Conceptualization: Giovanni Corrao, Giuseppe Mancia; Methodology: Federico Rea, Laura Savaré, Giovanni Corrao; Formal analysis and investigation: Federico Rea, Laura Savaré; Writing - original draft preparation: Federico Rea, Giuseppe Mancia; Writing – review and editing: Laura Savaré, Giovanni Corrao; Funding acquisition: Giovanni Corrao; Supervision: Giovanni Corrao, Giuseppe Mancia.
Disclosures
Giovanni Corrao received research support from the European Community (EC), the Italian Agency of Drug (AIFA), and the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR). He took part to a variety of projects that were funded by pharmaceutical companies (i.e., Novartis, GSK, Roche, AMGEN, BMS and Servier). He also received honoraria as member of Advisory Board from Roche. Giuseppe Mancia received honoraria for participation as speaker/chairman in national/international meetings from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CVRx, Daiichi Sankyo, Ferrer, Medtronic, Menarini Int., Merck, Novartis, Recordati and Servier. Federico Rea and Laura Savaré have nothing to disclose.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
According to the rules from the Italian Medicines Agency (available at: http://www.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/sites/default/files/det_20marzo2008.pdf), retrospective studies using administrative databases do not require Ethics Committee protocol approval. The Authors of the present manuscript were allowed access to these databases through an agreement with Lombardy Region for the current study (‘Ricerca Finalizzata 2016’, NET- 2016-02363853. No identifiable information was made available to the authors.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from Lombardy Region, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the Lombardy Region upon reasonable request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rea, F., Savaré, L., Corrao, G. et al. Adherence to Lipid-Lowering Treatment by Single-Pill Combination of Statin and Ezetimibe. Adv Ther 38, 5270–5285 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01892-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01892-7