Abstract
The term “biceps brachii” is a Latin phrase meaning “two-headed (muscle) of the arm.” As its name suggests, this muscle has two separate origins. The short head of biceps is extraarticular in location, originates from the coracoid process of the scapula, having a common tendon with the coracobrachialis muscle. The long head of biceps tendon (LBT) has a much more complex course, having an intracapsular and an extracapsular portion. The LBT originates from the supraglenoid tubercle, and in part, from the glenoid labrum; the main labral attachments vary arising from the posterior, the anterior of both aspects of the superior labrum (Bletran et al. in Top Magn Reson Imaging 14:35–49, 2003; Vangsness et al. in J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:951–954, 1994). Before entering the bicipital groove (extracapsular portion), the LBT passes across the “rotator cuff interval” (intracapsular portion). Lesions of the pulley system, the LBT, and the supraspinatus tendon, as well as the subscapularis, are commonly associated (Valadie et al. in J Should Elbow Surg 9:36–46, 2000). The pulley lesion can be caused by trauma or degenerative changes (LeHuec et al. in J Should Elbow Surg 5:41–46, 1996). MR arthrography appears to be a promising imaging modality for evaluation of the biceps pulley, through the distention of the capsule of the rotator interval space and depiction of the associated ligaments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Normal anatomy
The term “biceps brachii” is a Latin phrase meaning “two-headed (muscle) of the arm.” As its name suggests, this muscle has two separate origins. The short head of biceps is extraarticular in location, originates from the coracoid process of the scapula, having a common tendon with the coracobrachialis muscle [1–4].
The LBT has a much more complex course, having an intracapsular and an extracapsular portion. The LBT originates from the supraglenoid tubercle, and in part, from the glenoid labrum; the main labral attachments vary arising from the posterior, the anterior of both aspects of the superior labrum [1, 2]. Before entering the bicipital groove (extracapsular portion), the LBT passes across the “rotator cuff interval” (intracapsular portion).
The rotator interval is a triangular space defined superiorly by the anterior border of the supraspinatus tendon and inferiorly by the superior border of subscapularis. The base of the triangle is at the base of coracoid process, and its apex is at the transverse ligament. The rotator interval represents a defect in the rotator cuff resulting from the protrusion of the coracoid process between the supraspinatus and subscapularis tendon [5].
Along its course in the rotator interval, the LBT is stabilized by the so-called biceps pulley (or “reflection pulley”), formed by the coracohumeral ligament (CHL) and superior glenohumeral ligament (GHL) [6] (Fig. 1). The CHL originates from the lateral aspect of the base of the coracoid process, and distally it forms two bands. The medial and smaller band crosses over the LBT and inserts at the lesser tuberosity; the lateral and larger band inserts on the grater tuberosity and on the anterior portion of the supraspinatus tendon. The superior GHL arise from the superior glenoid tubercle, anterior to the biceps tendon and inserts to the lesser tuberosity.
Imaging
The biceps pulley is a complex structure, formed by more ligaments which cross the rotator interval very close to one another and blend together at their distal attachment sites [7].
In a cadaveric study by Chung et al., only direct MR arthrography has demonstrated sufficient accuracy in depicting the rotator interval anatomy [8–10]. In their study at the routine MR imaging, only some parts of intraarticular portion of LBT were demonstrated, and the ligaments of biceps pulley were poorly identified, while at direct MR arthrography, all parts of LBT, the CHL and superior GHL were seen in all cases. Oblique sagittal images should be the best to the structures of the rotator interval [11, 12] (Fig. 2); axial images are also valid to identify the ligaments of the biceps pulley [13, 14] (Fig. 3). Sequences with high image matrix are recommended [15, 16].
At ultrasound (US), the CHL is best identified on short-axis scans, as a homogeneous echogenic band located over the LBT, tightened between the subscapularis and the supraspinatus. Although US cannot identify the superior GHL, the portion of ligament that merges with the medial portion of the CHL and inserts into lesser tuberosity (the biceps pulley) can be detected [17, 18] (Fig. 2).
Rotator interval lesions
The “cuff rotator interval” can be considered as a single functional complex, and its structures, including the LBT, the biceps anchor, the CHL, the superior GHL, the anterior portion of supraspinatus and superior portion of subscapularis, are closely associated with each other.
Rotator interval abnormalities have been called “hidden” lesions, a phrase first used by Walch et al. [19] referring to the difficult arthroscopic visualization. A rotator interval lesion can be caused by acute trauma, repetitive microtrauma or degenerative changes [5].
In acute trauma, the rotator interval structures may be thickened, irregular or disrupted [2] (Fig. 4a, b).
Some authors have described the rotator interval tears in association with glenohumeral instability [20] (Fig. 5), in some cases resulting as isolated lesion [21].
Baumann et al. have suggested that traumatic injuries resulting from a fall on an outstretched arm in combination with full external or internal rotation, a fall backward on the hand or elbow, or direct anterior impact may cause lesion of the biceps pulley [5, 22].
A rotator interval tear may also occur as an extension of injury from the tendons of the rotator cuff [8, 19, 23, 24] (Fig. 6a, b).
Degenerative lesions of the rotator interval may be due to anatomical variations that cause instability of the LBT [13, 25, 26].
A cause of repeated microtrauma that causes the injury of the pulley is the “anterosuperior impingement.”
Gerber and Sebesta [27] first described the intraarticular impingement. In a position of horizontal adduction and internal rotation of the arm, the undersurface of subscapularis tendon and of the biceps pulley impinges against the anterosuperior glenoid rim.
Subsequently, Habermeyer et al. [28] have identified four groups of pulley lesions. Group 1: isolated superior GHL lesion (Fig. 7a, b); group 2: superior GHL lesion with a partial articular-side supraspinatus tendon tear (Fig. 8a–d); group 3: superior GHL lesion with a partial articular-side subscapularis tendon tear (Fig. 9a–d) and; group 4: superior GHL lesion with a partial articular-side tears of both supraspinatus and subscapularis tendon (Fig. 10a, b).
Only few studies report the values of the accuracy of MR in the evaluation of lesions of the superior GHL. Chandnani et al. [29] reported that MR arthrography had a sensitivity of 100 %, a specificity of 94 % and an accuracy of 94 % in the diagnosis of superior GHL tears.
Long head biceps instability
Dislocation or subluxation of the LBT is the possible complication of the rotator interval lesion.
Walch et al. defined [23] biceps dislocation as non-reducible and complete loss of contact between the long head of the biceps brachii tendon and the bicipital groove. They classified dislocations in four types: (a) dislocation of the LBT inside the subscapularis tendon with intact anterior fascia (Fig. 11a, b); (b) intraarticular dislocation with a complete tear of the all insertions of the lesser tuberosity, but intact anterior fascia (Fig. 12a, b); (c) intraarticular dislocation with a complete tear of the all insertions of the lesser tuberosity and anterior fascia (Fig. 13a, b) and; (d) dislocation over an intact subscapularis tendon due to a supraspinatus tear that extends to involve the lateral CHL ligament (Fig. 14a–c).
Biceps subluxation was defined by Walch et al. as tendon fixed over the medial rim at the superior part of the groove or recentred into the groove before disappearance of the groove. In their study, in the cases of subluxation, the subscapularis tendon was torn, with an intact pulley [20].
Superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions
The rotator interval lesion is often associated with superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions [6].
Snyder et al. [30] described four types of SLAP lesions. Type I lesion is characterized by fraying but with no frank tear of the articulating surface of the superior portion of the glenoid labrum and with an intact biceps tendon. The type II lesion consists of superior labral fraying with stripping of the labrum and attached biceps tendon from the underlying glenoid cartilage (Fig. 15a, b). The type III lesion is a bucket-handle tear of the superior portion of the labrum with the central portion of the tear often displaced into the joint and the peripheral portion firmly attached to the glenoid rim; the biceps tendon remains intact. The type IV lesion consists of a bucket-handle tear of the superior portion of the labrum similar to the type III lesion, but with the tear extending into the biceps tendon (Fig. 16).
Three distinct type II SLAP lesions were described on the basis of anatomical location. A type IIA abnormality represents an anterosuperior labral lesion, a type IIB abnormality represents a posterosuperior lesion and a type IIC abnormality represents a superior lesion with both anterior and posterior components [31].
MR arthrography and CT arthrography have demonstrated sufficient accuracy in identifying the labral tears [32, 33].
It is important to assess the direction and signal morphology of the lesion in order not to confuse the lesion with the frequent normal variants of the superior labrum, such us sublabral recess, sublabral foramen and Buford complex [34].
Conclusion
Lesions of the pulley system, the LBT, and the supraspinatus tendon, as well as the subscapularis, are commonly associated [3]. The pulley lesion can be caused by trauma or degenerative changes [4]. MR arthrography appears to be a promising imaging modality for evaluation of the biceps pulley, through the distention of the capsule of the rotator interval space and depiction of the associated ligaments [1].
References
Bletran J, Jbara M, Maiomon R (2003) Shoulder: labrum and bicipital tendon. Top Magn Reson Imaging 14:35–49
Vangsness CT Jr, Jorgenson SS, Watson T, Johnson DL (1994) The origin of the long head of the biceps from the scapula and glenoid labrum: an anatomical study of 100 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:951–954
Valadie AL III, Jobe CM, Pink MM, Ekman E, Jobe FW (2000) Anatomy of provocative tests for impingement syndrome of the shoulder. J Should Elbow Surg 9:36–46
LeHuec JC, Schaeverbeke T, Moinard M et al (1996) Traumatic tear of the rotator interval. J Should Elbow Surg 5:41–46
Jost B, Koch PP, Gerber C (2000) Anatomy and functional aspects of the rotator interval. J Should Elbow Surg 9:336–341
Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Levigne C, Renaud E (1994) Tears of the supraspinatus tendon associated with “hidden” lesions of the rotator interval. J Should Elbow Surg 3:353–360
Morag Y, Jacobson JA, Shields G, Rajani R, Jamadar DA, Miller B, Hayes CW (2005) MR arthrography of rotator interval, long head of the biceps brachii, and biceps pulley of the shoulder. Radiology 235(1):21–30
Chung CB, Dwek JR, Cho GJ, Lektrakul N, Trudell D, Resnick D (2000) Rotator cuff interval: evaluation with MR imaging and MR arthrography of the shoulder in 32 cadavers. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:738–743
Macarini L, Muscarella S, Lelario M, Stoppino L, Scalzo G, Scelzi A, Armillotta M, Sforza N, Vinci R (2011) Rotator cable at MR imaging: considerations on morphological aspects and biomechanical role. Radiol Med 116(1):102–113
Macarini L, Murrone M, Marini S, Mocci A, Ettorre GC (2004) MRI in ACL reconstructive surgery with PDLLA bioabsorbable interference screws: evaluation of degradation and osteointegration processes of bioabsorbable screws. Radiol Med 107(1–2):47–57
Ho CP (1999) MR. Imaging of rotator interval, long biceps and associated injuries in the overhead-throwing athlete. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 7:23–37
Russo R, Vernaglia Lombardi L, Visconti V, Della Rotonda G (2011) Massive rotator cuff tear treated with a synthetic patch: a case report 16 years after surgery. Musculoskelet Surg 95(Suppl 1):S83–S87
Nakata W, Katou S, Fujita A, Nakata M, Lefor AT, Sugimoto H (2011) Biceps pulley: normal anatomy and associated lesions at MR arthrography. Radiographics 31(3):791–810
Lollino N, Pellegrini A, Paladini P, Campi F, Porcellini G (2011) Gleno–humeral arthritis in young patients: clinical and radiographic analysis of humerus resurfacing prosthesis and meniscus interposition. Musculoskelet Surg 95(Suppl 1):S59–S63
Lee JC, Guy S, Connell D, Saifuddin A, Lambert S (2007) MRI of the rotator interval of the shoulder. Clin Radiol 62(5):416–423
Merolla G, Sperling J, Paladini P, Porcellini G (2011) Efficacy of hylan G-F 20 versus 6-methylprednisolone acetate in painful shoulder osteoarthritis: a retrospective controlled trial. Musculoskelet Surg 95:215–224
Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Prato N et al (2003) US of the shoulder: non-rotator cuff disorders. Radiographics 23:381–401
Pons-Villanueva J, Romero Muñoz LM, Amillo Garayoa S (2011) Ossifying lesion of the rotator interval. Musculoskelet Surg 95:53–57
Walch G, Nové-Josserand L, Boileau P, Levigne C (1998) Subluxations and dislocations of the tendon of the long head of the biceps. J Should Elbow Surg 7(2):100–108
Rowe CR, Zarins B (1981) Recurrent transient subluxation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:863–872
Field LD, Warren RF, O’Brien SJ, Altchek DW, Wickiewicz TL (1995) Isolated closure of rotator interval defects for shoulder instability. Am J Sports Med 23:557–563
Baumann B, Genning K, Böhm D, Rolf O, Gohlke F (2008) Arthroscopic prevalence of pulley lesions in 1,007 consecutive patients. J Should Elbow Surg 17(1):14–20
Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Tanner A, Gerber C, Hodler J (1999) Lesions of the reflection pulley of the long biceps tendon. Invest Radiol 34:463–469
Pinto A, Brunese L, Pinto F, Reali R, Daniele S, Romano L (2012) The concept of error and malpractice in radiology. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 33(4):275–279
Nobuhara K, Ikeda H (1987) Rotator interval lesion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 223:44–50
Nidecker A, Gückel C, von Hochstetter A (1997) Imaging the long head of biceps tendon: a pictorial essay emphasizing magnetic resonance. Eur J Radiol 25(3):177–187
Gerber C, Sebesta A (2000) Impingement of the deep surface of the subscapularis tendon and the reflection pulley on the anterosuperior glenoid rim: a preliminary report. J Should Elbow Surg 9(6):483–490
Habermeyer P, Magosch P, Pritsch M, Scheibel MT, Lichtenberg S (2004) Anterosuperior impingement of the shoulder as a result of pulley lesions: a prospective arthroscopic study. J Should Elbow Surg 13(1):5–12
Chandnani VP, Gagliardi JA, Murnane TG et al (1995) Glenohumeral ligaments and shoulder capsular mechanism: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology 196(1):27–32
Snyder SJ, Karzel RP, Del Pizzo W, Ferkel RD, Friedman MJ (1990) SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 6(4):274–279
Morgan CD, Burkhart SS, Palmeri M, Gillespie M (1998) Type II SLAP lesions: three subtypes and their relationships to superior instability and rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 14:553–565
Zappia M, Negri G, Grassi S, Pecoraro C, Rotondo A (2008) The CT-arthrography in the antero-inferior glenoid labral lesion: pictorial presentation and diagnostic value. Int J Should Surg 2(1):7–12
De Filippo M, Bertellini A, Sverzellati N, Pogliacomi F, Costantino C, Vitale M, Zappia M, Corradi D, Garlaschi G, Zompatori M (2008) Multidetector computed tomography arthrography of the shoulder: diagnostic accuracy and indications. Acta Radiol 49(5):540–549
Mohana-Borges AV, Chung CB, Resnick D (2003) Superior labral anteroposterior tear: classification and diagnosis on MRI and MR arthrography. AJR 181:1449–1462
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Alessandra Trocino, Librarian at the Library of NCI G Pascale Foundation of Naples, Italy, for her excellent bibliographic service and assistance.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical standards
The study described in this article did not include any procedures involving humans or animal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zappia, M., Reginelli, A., Russo, A. et al. Long head of the biceps tendon and rotator interval. Musculoskelet Surg 97 (Suppl 2), 99–108 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-013-0290-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-013-0290-z