Introduction

Beta thalassemia is an autosomal recessive inherited disorder of hemoglobin, due to a defect involving the beta globin gene. The resultant phenotype ranges from transfusion dependent thalassemia major (Transfusion dependent thalassemia [TDT]), to the asymptomatic thalassemia minor. In between these two extremes lies the phenotype of thalassemia intermedia, which is usually transfusion independent (NTDT) [1]. Both syndromes are at risk of complications of chronic hemolytic anemia, extramedullary hemopoiesis, iron overload and the risk of acquiring transfusion-transmitted infections [2].

Thalidomide is a synthetic glutamic acid derivative, which has been introduced in the late fifties of the last century, and became accessible for the management of morning sickness in pregnant women, but it was later abandoned because of its teratogenic effect, which led to one of the worst medically induced tragedies in history, when more than 10,000 babies were born with major crippling malformations [3]. Several decades later, the drug found new uses, particularly in the management of multiple myeloma, and leprosy [3]. The first report on its use in thalassemia appeared in 2008 [4], this was followed by few other case reports and small case series over the past decade, though no controlled, double-blind trial results were reported yet [5,6,7,8,9,10].

Iraq has a large population of patients with symptomatic beta-thalassemia [11], and the country passed over the past few years in periods of instability, and restriction of the availability of health services in some areas. Many of the thalassemic patients became internally displaced, and lost their access to proper health care and suffered extreme financial hardship. This eventually led to conventional thalassemia care being either unavailable or to families declining pursuit of these services, and the need to provide non-conventional approach is these unusual situations presented itself as a challenge to physicians managing these patients in this part of the world. Therefore we investigated the role of thalidomide in this particular category of patients with transfusion-dependent or symptomatic non-transfusion dependent thalassemia patients, after proper ethical approval and informed consent of patients and their guardians.

Patients and Methods

In the period from October 2015 to October 2018, 37 patients with confirmed symptomatic β-thalassemia, including 14 transfusion-dependent (TDT) (37.8%) and 23 Non-transfusion dependent thalassemia patients (62.2%) were recruited. Patients were recruited either because they declined transfusion therapy and chelation therapy, or these services were not readily available in the cities of their residence.

Patients with liver, renal, cardiac, pulmonary, neurological deficits or history of thrombotic episodes were excluded. For all females in the childbearing age, pregnancy tests were performed to exclude pregnancy, and they were advised not to contemplate pregnancy while on thalidomide and for 6 months after that.

Following full clinical evaluation and record review, Thalidomide was given so that the dose will be in the range of 2–10 mg/kg at any time throughout therapy. Initially however, a dose of 3 mg/kg adjusted to nearest 50 mg was used. If no response in 2 months then the dose was escalated accordingly. After that, patients were followed up for response and any adverse effects. Patients who could continue on iron chelation by Deferasirox or Deferoxamine were encouraged to do so, as per guidelines of such therapy per the thalassemia center.

Criteria for Response

Patients were followed for the response, blood counts, RFT, LFT and any adverse effects, initially on monthly bases for the first 3 months, then every other month after that; if no response within 12 months, thalidomide was discontinued and the patient advised to resume conventional management.

Patient with NTDT was considered responsive if their Hb rises by 1 g m or more. The response was categorized as useful if Hb increased by 1–1.9 g m/dL and very good if Hb rise was 2 g or more from baseline Hb level. Patients with TDT were considered responsive if their transfusion requirement dropped by 25% or more from pre-therapy status (6 months before vs. 6 months after). The response was deemed to be significant if the patient became transfusion independent.

Ethical approval was granted from the ethical committee in the college of medicine-Hawler medical university.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 22). Chi square test of association was used to compare proportions. Fisher’s exact test was used when the expected count of more than 20% of the cells of the table was less than 5. Student’s t test of two independent samples was used to compare two means. Paired sample t-test was used to compare means before and after treatment. A p value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The median age of the enrolled patients was 10 years (range 3–43 years) and included 21 males and 16 female. They included 14 patients with TDT and 23 with NTDT. Seven patients were splenectomized (18.9%).

After a mean time of 1.7 months (SD 0.76) of initiating thalidomide, a total of 28/37 (75.7%) of patients showed a response to therapy as defined in materials and methods, including 17/23 in NTDT (73.9%) and 11/14 in TDT (78.5%) (Tables 1, 2). The difference in response rate between TDT and NTDT was not significant (P = 0.94). The mean hemoglobin increased in NTDT from 7.83 g/dL (SD 1.07) prior therapy to a mean 9.96 g/dL (SD 1.11) at last follow up (P < 0.001). Transfusion requirement in TDT, on the other hand, dropped from 27 annually (SD 17.7) prior therapy, to 7.79 annually (SD 7.5) at last follow up (P = 0.001) (Table 1).

Table 1 NTDT and TDT Response to Thalidomide as measured by Hemoglobin increment in NTDT (upper part) and drop in transfusion requirement in TDT (lower part)
Table 2 Mean percentage of ferritin change after treatment by response to treatment

Figures 1 and 2 show the changes in hemoglobin and transfusion requirements in patients with NTDT and TDT, respectively, with treatment. The median follows up of all the patients was 15 months (range 8–36 months), with 17 of the 28 responders having a follow up more than 12 months. As demonstrated in both figures, the responses attained initially were sustained throughout subsequent follow up.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Showing hemoglobin response in relation to months of therapy in NTDT

Fig. 2
figure 2

Transfusion requirement in relation to duration of therapy in TDT

Our results showed no significant association between the response rate to thalidomide with the following variables: group (NTDT/TDT) (P > 0.999), age (P = 0.214), gender (P > 0.999), splenectomy (P = 0.656).

It is evident in Table 2 that the mean percentage of ferritin change after treatment was 29.86% among patients who responded to treatment compared with − 7.77% among non-responders (P = 0.012).

Among our patients seven were using Deferasirox, five of them were among responders and tow were non responders.

Regarding the adverse effects during therapy, ten patients developed constipation of whom three required laxatives while seven responded to dietary measures. One patient developed extramedullary hemopoiesis in the form of multiple abdominal masses, and thalidomide was stopped and Hydroxyurea therapy was initiated after which masses disappeared and with a continued response and no deterioration in blood indices, LFT or RFT was recorded.

Discussion

Symptomatic Beta thalassemia is a crucial health problem in the Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR) and its management in most of these countries is based on a combination of transfusion and chelation therapy. Bone marrow transplantation remains the only curative approach to these syndromes [12], though its adoption is limited in the developing countries because of its vast expense and need of expertise in the setting of dedicated centers. Transfusions and chelation therapy thus remain the mainstay of management in EMR currently and are usually provided in the context of specialized thalassemia center, which is an expensive practice to run, and is to a great extent dependent on the governmental sponsorship and is quite influenced by literacy and dedication of the patients’ families.

Several non-conventional approaches to the management of NTDT and a lesser extent TDT have been proposed. They include the Hb F inducer Hydroxyurea, which was found to be quite useful in sickle cell disease, was used in Thalassemia with variable results [13]. Other non-selective agents, including cytotoxic and hypomethylating drugs, short-chain fatty acids and erythropoietin has also been investigated [14].

Thalidomide is another non-conventional management option, the mechanism of action of which is not precisely known, though some studies have found that this may occur through Hb F induction [6, 10]. Furthermore, in vitro experiments have suggested that this drug induces the expression of Gamma Globin chains through increased reactive oxygen species-mediated p38 MAPK signaling and histone H 4 acetylation [15]. The induced increased gamma chain production would eventually reduce α: β chain imbalance, and thus the toxic effect of deposited excess α-chains on the red cell precursors, which is the most critical mechanism explaining the pathogenesis of beta-thalassemia [16].

Though few reports suggest a promising role for thalidomide in symptomatic beta-thalassemia, its use has been debated, and there is yet no substantial justification for its use in the absence of published controlled trials, except if conventional therapy cannot be provided [17]. The latter situation was the case in our series, wherein the face of extreme hardship, such treatment was offered. The current study which included one of the largest cohorts studied yet, with a relatively long follow up, and it revealed that around three-quarters of Iraqi patients treated with this medication responded significantly, whether TDT or NTDT. Earlier case reports or small series also documented a significant response in thalassemia intermedia/NTDT [5, 8] and TDT [7, 18], although at least one case report on an Indian TDT failed to elicit such a response [19]. The rate of response appears much better than rates reported by the more popular HbF inducer “Hydroxyurea” in NTDT and TDT [13], this observation was also suggested by an earlier small series of Chinese Thalassemia intermedia reported recently. The time to response in the current study was 1.7 months, which is consistent with previous reports suggesting a time to response ranging from 2 weeks to 3 months [4, 5, 7, 8]. Furthermore, the response was sustained even after long follow up reaching up to 3 years in the current study (median 15 months), and again this is shared by previous observers [5, 8].

Limited complications were reported in the current series, and thrombosis, which is one of the most feared complications, was not documented in any patients. Despite that reports of deep venous thrombosis and stroke have been documented in thalidomide treated thalassemia significant patients in previous studies [20] and physicians contemplating its use should be vigilant to its occurrence and should take preventive measure.

Conclusion

The current series has demonstrated a significant response to thalidomide in more than three-quarters of symptomatic beta-thalassemia patients, whether TDT and NTDT. These observations support a role for this medication in a subset of these patients when conventional therapy is declined or is unavailable, until such a time that controlled trials results confirm these observations.