Abstract
This paper details the use of a simplified CFD model to predict the flow patterns around a computer simulated person in a displacement ventilated room. The use of CFD is a valuable tool for indoor airflow analysis and the level of complexity of the model being investigated is often critical to the accuracy of predictions. The closer the computational geometry is to the real geometry of interest, the more accurate the corresponding results are expected to be. High complexity meshes enable elaborated geometries to be resolved. The drawback is, however, their increased computational cost. The Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) model (Version 5) enabled to investigate the effects of geometry and computational grid simplification on the accuracy of numerical predictions. The FDS model is based on a three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system and all solid obstructions are forced to conform to the underlying numerical grid which is a potential limitation when dealing with complex geometries such as those of a human body. Nevertheless, the developed computational model was based exclusively on a three-dimensional rectangular geometry. At the same time, in order to limit the total number of grid cells, a relatively coarser grid than those used for similar simulations was adopted in the investigation. The developed model was then assessed in terms of its capability of reproducing benchmark temperature and air velocity distributions. The extent to which numerical results depend on different simulation settings was detailed and different boundary conditions are discussed in order to provide some guidance on the parameters that resulted to affect the accuracy of the predicted results. The comparison between numerical results and measurements showed that a simplified CFD model can be used to capture the airflow characteristics of the investigated scenario with predictions showing a favourable agreement with experimental data at least in the qualitative features of the flow (the detailed investigation of the local airflow field near the occupant can not be probably conducted apart from considering the real human geometry). Significant influence of simulator geometry and of boundary conditions was found.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abanto J, Barrero D, Reggio M, Hardy JP, Ozell B (2004). Application of CFD tools in building engineering and in fire simulation. Paper presented at the Simbuild Conference, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA.
ASHRAE (2001). ASHRAE Handbook-Fundamentals. Atlanta, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE (2005). ASHRAE Handbook-Fundamentals. Atlanta, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
Bolashikov ZD (2010). Advanced methods for air distribution in occupied spaces for reduced risk from airborne diseases and improved air quality. PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
Brohus H (1997). Personal exposure to contaminant sources in ventilated rooms. PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Aalborg University, Denmark.
Brohus H, Nielsen PV (1996). CFD models of persons evaluated by full scale wind channel experiments. Paper presented at the 1996 RoomVent Conference, Japan.
Caciolo M, Stabat P, Marchio D (2012). Numerical simulation of single sided ventilation using RANS and LES and comparison with full-scale experiments. Building and Environment, 50: 202–213.
Clement JM (2000). Experimental verification of the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) hydrodynamic model. PhD Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
Cho YH, Liu M (2010). Correlation between minimum airflow and discharge air temperature. Building and Environment, 45: 1601–1611.
Craven BA, Settles GS (2006). A computational and experimental investigation of the human thermal plume. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 128: 1251–1258.
De Dear JR, Arens AE, Zhang H, Oguro M (1996). Convective and radiative heat transfer coefficients for individual human body segments. International Journal of Biometeorology, 40: 141–156.
Deevy M (2006). CFD modelling of the benchmark displacement ventilation test case. Health and Safety Laboratory, HSL0686.
Deevy M, Gobeau N (2006). CFD modelling of benchmark test cases for flow around a computer simulated person. Health and Safety Laboratory, HSL0651.
Deevy M, Sinai Y, Everitt P, Voigt L, Gobeau N (2008). Modelling the effect of an occupant on displacement ventilation with computational fluid dynamics. Energy and Buildings, 40: 255–264.
Doherty T, Arens AE (1988). Evaluation of the physiological bases of thermal comfort models. ASHRAE Transactions, 94(1): 1371–1385.
Emmerich SJ (1997). Use of computational fluid dynamics to analyze indoor air quality issues. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), NISTIR 5997.
Emmerich SJ, McGrattan KB (1998). Application of a large eddy simulation model to study room airflow. ASHRAE Transactions, 104(1): 1128–1137.
Farnham C, Nakao M, Nishioka M, Nabeshima M, Mizuno T (2011). Study of mist-cooling for semi-enclosed spaces in Osaka, Japan. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 4: 228–238.
Floyd JE, McGrattan KB, Hostikka S, Baum HR (2003). CFD fire simulation using mixture fraction combustion and finite volume radiative heat transfer. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 13: 11–36.
Gao N, Liu J (2005). CFD study of the thermal environment around a human body: A review. Indoor and Built Environment, 14: 5–16.
Hadjisophocleous GV, McCartney CJ (2005). Guidelines for the use of CFD simulation for fire and smoke modelling. ASHRAE Transactions, 111 (2): 583–594.
Hostikka S (2011). The FDS Road Map. Available: http://code.google.com/p/fds-smv/wiki/FDS_Road_Map.
Jiang J, Wang X, Sun Y, Zhang Y (2009). Experimental and numerical study of air flows in a full scale room. ASHRAE Transactions, 115(2): 867–886.
Jiang Y, Alexander D, Jenkins H, Arthur R, Chen Q (2003). Natural ventilation in buildings: Measurements in a wind tunnel and numerical simulation with large eddy simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 91: 331–353.
Kato S (2005). Displacement Ventilation: Comprehensive Experimental Data. Available: http://www.civil.auc.dk/%7Ei6pvn/cfd-benschmarks/csp_benchmark_test/.
Kato S, Yang JH (2006). Benchmark Tests of CFD Airflow Around Human Body in a Room with Displacement Ventilation. Available: http://www.civil.auc.dk/%7Ei6pvn/cfd-benschmarks/csp_benchmark_test/.
Li Q, Yang Q (2009). Comparison of subgrid-scale models in large eddy simulation of flow over a rectangular obstacle. Paper presented at the 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
Lin CH, Wu TT, Horstman RH, Lebbin PA, Hosni MH, Jones BW and Beck BT (2006). Comparison of large eddy simulation predictions with particle image velocimetry data for the airflow in a generic cabin model. HVAC & Research, 12: 953–951.
Liu W, Mazumdar S, Zhang Z, Poussou SB, Liu J, Lin CH, Chen Q (2012). State-of-the-art methods for studying air distributions in commercial airliner cabins. Building and Environment, 47: 5–12.
McDermott R (2009). FDS wall flows Part I: Straight channels. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Technical Note 1640.
McDermott R, McGrattan K, Hostikka S, Floyd J (2010). Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5) Technical Reference Guide. Volume 2: Verification. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 1018-5.
McGrattan K, McDermott R, Hostikka S, Floyd J (2010a). Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5) User’s Guide. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 1019-5.
McGrattan K, McDermott R, Hostikka S, Floyd J (2010b). Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5) Technical Reference Guide. Volume 3: Validation. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 1019-5.
McGrattan K, Hostikka S, Floyd J, Baum H, Rehm R, Mell W, McDermott R (2010c). Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5) Technical Reference Guide. Volume 1: Mathematical Model. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Special Publication 1018-5.
McGrattan K, McDermott R, Floyd J, Hostikka S, Baum H (2012). Computational fluid dynamics modelling of fire. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 26: 349–361.
Mora L, Gadgil AJ (2002). Theoretical study of pollutant mixing in rooms induced by occupancy. Paper presented at the 2002 RoomVent Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark. Also Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report LBNL-49730.
Musser A, McGrattan KB, Palmer J (2001). Evaluation of a fast, simplified computational fluid dynamics model for solving room airflow problems. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), NISTIR 6760.
Sideroff CN, Dang TQ (2008). Verification and validation of CFD for the personal micro-environment. ASHRAE Transactions, 114(2): 45–56.
Shih N, Lee W (2004). Particles simulation and evaluation of personal exposure to contaminant sources in an elevation space. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Weimar, Germany.
Srebric J, Vukovic V, He G, Yang X (2008). CFD boundary conditions for contaminant dispersion, heat transfer and airflow simulations around human occupants in indoor environments. Building and Environment, 43: 294–303.
Temmerman L, Leschzinger MA, Mellen CP, Fröhlich J (2003). Investigation of wall function approximations and subgrid scale models in large eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 24: 157–180.
Wang HY, Coutin M, Most JM (2002). Large eddy simulation of a buoyancy driven fire propagation behind a pyrolysis zone along a vertical wall. Fire Safety Journal, 37: 259–285.
Wang X, Jiang J, Zhang Y (2007). Numerical study of air movement in a slot-ventilated enclosure. ASHRAE Transactions, 113(1): 408–413.
Versteeg HK, Malalasekera W (1995). An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics. London: Longman Scientific & Technical.
Yan W, Yang X, Shan M (2009). How to simplify computer simulated persons (CSPs) for modelling personal microenvironments: Comparison and case studies. ASHRAE Transactions, 115(1): 473–483.
Yang T, Cropper PC, Cook JM, Yousaf R, Fiala D (2007). A new simulation system to predict human-environment thermal interactions in naturally ventilated buildings. Paper presented at the 10th International IBPSA Conference (BS2007), Beijing, China.
Zhai Z, Wang H (2011). Optimizing the trade off between grid resolution and simulation accuracy: Coarse grid CFD modeling. ASHRAE Research project RP - 1418.
Zhai Z, Zhang Z, Zhang W, Chen Q (2007). Evaluation of various turbulence models in predicting airflow and turbulence in enclosed environments by CFD: Part 1: Summary of prevalent turbulence models. HVAC&R Research, 13: 853–870.
Zukowska D, Popiolek Z, Melikov A (2007). Impact of personal factors and furniture arrangement on the thermal plume above a human body. Paper presented at the 2007 RoomVent Conference, Helsinki, Finland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Villi, G., De Carli, M. Detailing the effects of geometry approximation and grid simplification on the capability of a CFD model to address the benchmark test case for flow around a computer simulated person. Build. Simul. 7, 35–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-013-0103-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-013-0103-1