Abstract
Glioblastoma multiform is a lethal brain glial tumor characterized by low survival and high recurrence, partially attributed to the glioblastoma stem cells according to recent researches. Microenvironment or niche in tumor tissue is believed to provide essential support for the aberrant growth of tumor stem cells. In order to explore the effect of growth factors in tumor microenvironment on glioblastoma stem cells behavior, glioblastoma-derived stem-like cells (GDSCs) were isolated from adult human glioblastoma specimen with antibody against surface marker CD133 and were co-cultured with various tumor cells including U87MG cells, unsorted glioblastoma tumor cells, CD133- cells and normal rat primary astrocytes. Results suggested that tumor cells could promote GDSCs proliferation while non-tumor cells could not, and several growth factors were exclusively detected in the co-culture system with tumor cells. It was concluded that growth factors derived from tumor microenvironment possibly contributed to the uncontrolled proliferation of GDSCs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Glioblastoma multiforme, ranked grade IV according to the World Health Organization classification, is widely considered as the most common and malignant glioma with a median survival of less than 12 month because of fast proliferation and high recurrence rates [1]. However, conventional anti-cancer treatments including radiation, chemotherapy and surgery showed limited or no therapeutic effect on these brain tumors [2, 3]. It has been assumed that a subpopulation of cells exists in tumor tissue, which is responsible for tumor initiation and refractory. Recently, isolation and identification of tumor stem cells in human brain tumors and C6 glioma cell line supported this hypothesis. A lot of researches demonstrated that brain tumor stem cells bear almost all features of neural stem cells in proliferation, self-renewal and differentiation capacity as well as the ability to generate new tumors that faithfully reproduce the phenotype of human disease[1]. Brain tumor stem cells have been successfully enriched using antibody against the surface protein CD133, an antigen originally found to express on primitive population such as hematopoietic stem cells [4–7].
Mounting evidence has shown that the immediate microenvironment that stem cells reside in plays an important role in regulating their proliferation and differentiation. The stem cells niche is composed of various extracellular signals including extracellular matrix molecules, soluble factors and a number of differentiated cell types in specific location that function to maintain stem cells [8–11]. It has been suggested that the differentiated cells in niche might have protective role to stem cell in normal tissue [12, 13]. These mature cells not only communicate with stem cells directly but also release many soluble factors to keep stem cells in quiescent state. Similarly, brain tumor stem cells perhaps acquire specific signals from niche to support their uncontrolled proliferation and tumorigenesis. Bulk of tumor cells (non-stem cells) around the tumor stem cells provide direct cell contact and perhaps secrete factors influencing the tumor stem cells proliferation and differentiation. But it still remains unclear which factors contribute to the tumor stem cells proliferation and differentiation. In order to address how the microenvironment provided by tumor cells affects tumor stem cells behavior, we isolated CD133+ cells from human glioblastoma tissues and conformed their stem cell characteristics including proliferative and differentiation ability, further set up co-culture system for tumor stem cells with various brain tumor cells and normal cells, finally compared the growth factor expression pattern in conditioned medium from co-culture system with that from separately cultured cells. The results suggested that glioblastoma-derived stem-like cells (GDSCs) had potent proliferation and self-renewal abilities, but only differentiated into astrocye, not neuron and oligodendrocyte. Several growth factors released from GDSCs co-culturing with various tumor cells rather than normal brain cells possibly contributed to the abnormal proliferation of GDSCs.
Materials and Methods
Primary Glioblastoma Tumor Sphere Culture and Magnetic Cell Sorting
Tumor samples were obtained from consenting adult patients with typical glioblastoma multiforme, as approved by the Research Ethics Committee at Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command for patients and China Pharmaceutical University. As described in previous studies [6, 14], glioblastoma tissues were washed, minced and digested with trypsin-EDTA, and passed through the 70 μm nylon cell strainer (BD Falcon, USA). A portion of the mixed cells were used for glioblastoma tumor cell culture with DMEM/F12 medium containing 10 % FBS. The rest cells were cultured in serum-free DMEM/F12 medium with B27 supplement, EGF (20 ng/ml) and FGF (20 ng/ml) for 3 days before cell sorting [14]. Cells were dissociated and labeled with 100 μl of CD133 microbeads, then subjected to magnetic cell sorting according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Miltenyi Biotec). Both sorted CD133+ and CD133- cell populations were resuspended and cultured at clonal density (1 × 104 cells/ml) in DMEM/F12 medium with B27, EGF (20 ng/ml) and FGF (20 ng/ml).
Primary Astrocyte and Human Astrocytoma Cell Line U87MG Culture
Primary astrocyte from Sprague–Dawley (SD) rat (P0 pups) were cultured in DMEM/F12 (1:1) supplemented with 10 % FBS according to the described method [15, 16]. The purity was about 97 % indicated by immunostaining of astrocyte marker GFAP (data not shown). Human astrocytoma cell line U87MG (a generous gift from Dr. Zhi-cheng Xiao) were maintained in DMEM medium with 10 % FBS at 37 °C incubator with 5 % CO2.
Brdu-Incorporation Proliferation Assay
Dissociated single cells from glioblastoma-derived tumor spheres were seeded onto poly-L-lysine coated glass coverslips in 24-well plates at a density of 1 × 105/well and cultured in serum-free DMEM/F12 medium with B27, EGF (20 ng/ml) and FGF (20 ng/ml) for 24 h. Then BrdU (10 μg/ml, Sigma) was added into the medium and cells were cultured up to 1, 2, 5 and 7 days, respectively. Cell proliferation was indicated by BrdU incorporation rate.
MTT Assay
CD133+ and CD133- cells were respectively plated in 96-well plates in 200 μl of serum-free DMEM/F12 medium with B27, EGF (20 ng/ml) and FGF (20 ng/ml) at a density of 1000 cells/well. Then MTT assays were performed on day 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7, respectively. 20 μl of MTT (5 mg/ml in PBS) was added to each well and incubated for 4 h. 150 μl of DMSO was added to dissolve the insoluble purple formazan product to produce a colored solution. The optical density (OD) was read at 570 nm wavelength on the multi-well scanning spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad).
Limiting Dilution Assay
Limiting dilution assay was carried out according to methods described previously [17, 18]. CD133+ cells and CD133- cells were plated in 96-well plates in 200 μl of serum-free DMEM/F12 medium with B27, EGF (20 ng/ml) and FGF (20 ng/ml), respectively. Final dilutions ranged from 200 cells/well to 6 cells/well in 200 μl of medium. After 7 days in culture, the percentage of wells not containing spheres for each cell plating density was calculated and plotted against the number of cells per well. Regression lines were plotted and x-intercept values were measured, which represent the number of cells required to form at least 1 tumor sphere in each well.
Differentiation Assay
To assess GDSCs differentiation capacity, tumor spheres were mechanically dissociated into single cells, plated onto glass coverslips pre-coated with poly-L-lysine and cultured in DMEM/F12 medium with 1 % FBS and B27. Culture medium was refreshed every 2 days, and then fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde for imunocytochemistry after 7 days in culture.
Immunocytochemistry
Immunocytochemistry was performed according to previously described methods [19]. Briefly, Cells on coverslips were washed with PBS, fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde, blocked with 10 % normal goat serum in PBS, and incubated with primary antibody in 10 % normal goat serum at 4 °C overnight followed with Cy2- or Cy3-labeled secondary antibody. To determine the stem cell feature of sorted cells, tumor sphere cells were stained with antibodies against CD133/1 (mouse monoclonal IgG1; Miltenyi Biotec) and nestin (rabbit polyclonal; Chemicon). For BrdU incorporation assay, cells were incubated in 2 M HCl for 30 min at room temperature before blocking and incubation with anti-BrdU (mouse monoclonal, Santa Cruz). To determine the differentiation of stem-like cells, cells were immunostained with antibodies against β tubulin-III (Tuj; mouse monoclonal; Stem Cell company) for neurons; glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; rabbit polyclonal; DAKO) for astrocytes, and CNPase (mouse monoclonal; Sigma) for oligodendrocytes. All of the immunostaining was followed by anti-rabbit IgG antibody conjugated with Cy2 or anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated with Cy3 (1:200; Beyotime, China), and nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (10 μg/ml; Molecular Probes). Cells were visualized under Olympus fluorescent microscope. At least 10 viewing fields per group were randomly selected to calculate percentages of cells.
Co-culture System
The co-culture system was set up by use of Millicell polycarbonate filter chamber (Millipore Corp., Bedford, USA) according to previously described methods [20]. GDSCs were co-cultured with various feeder cells including rat primary astrocytes, U87MG cells, unsorted glioblastoma tumor cells and CD133- cells (sorted from the same glioblastoma), respectively. The feeder cells were plated into the apical compartment at a density of 5000 cells/millicell and cultured in DMEM/F12 medium with 10 % FBS for 2 days. Then the millicells were rinsed completely with PBS and culture medium was changed for serum-free DMEM/F12 medium with B27, EGF (20 ng/ml) and FGF (20 ng/ml). Four hours later the millicells were inserted into the 24-well plate pre-cultured with GDSCs. For GDSCs proliferation assays in co-culture system, BrdU (10 μg/ml) was added after co-culturing for 24 h. Five days later millicells were removed from co-culture system and tumor spheres were collected, dissociated into single cells and plated on coverslips pre-coated with Poly-L-lysine and cultured for further 1 day. BrdU incorporation assay was performed and BrdU positive cells were counted under Olympus fluorescent microscope.
Dot-Blotting Assay
After GDSCs were co-cultured with feeder cells or the cells were separately cultured for 5 days, conditioned media (CM) were collected, concentrated and dotted on the nitrocellulose membrane (2 μl/dot), and then membranes were incubated with growth factor antibody (anti-NGF polyclonal antibody; anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, anti-BDNF polyclonal antibody, anti-TGF-β monoclonal antibody and anti-NT-3 polyclonal antibody, 1:500, respectively, all antibodys were from Chemicon) followed by horseradish peroxidase conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Sigma). Signal intensities of various growth factors were determined by densitometry, and the relative signal intensities were measured. Data were from three independent experiments.
Statistic Analysis
Data were analyzed by Student’s t test and expressed as mean ± SE. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 compared with control.
Results
Isolation and Identification of Glioblastoma-Derived Stem-like Cells
Cultures were established from solid primary adult human glioblastoma (n = 3) to observe whether stem cells existed in the brain tumor samples that we obtained. Cells were isolated from tumor specimens, dissociated into single cells, sorted into CD133+ and CD133- cells and cultured in favored neural stem cell growth medium which was established previously. After 7 days in culture, it was found that neurosphere-like colonies appeared only in CD133+ cell culture from glioblastoma, while CD133- cells attached to culture plate and failed to form such colonies (Fig. 1b). The glioblastoma-derived tumor spheres were dissociated into single cells and cultured in the DMEM/F12 medium with B27, EGF and FGF. Subsphere derived from a single mother cell again appeared after being cultured for 5 days (Fig. 1a). To determine whether these tumor spheres express stem cell markers, we harvested subspheres for immunostaining. As shown in Fig. 1c-h, these tumor spheres were immunoreactive for nestin (an intermediate filament protein found in undifferentiated central nervous system cells and a characteristic neural stem/progenitor cell marker) [21] and for CD133 (a novel transmembrane cell surface protein, hematopoietic stem cell, human neurosphere and human brain tumor stem cells marker)[6, 22, 23]. The results demonstrated that glioblastoma-derived CD133+ cells could form neurosphere-like colonies which expressed nestin and CD133 as neural stem cells.
Glioblastoma-Derived CD133+ but Not CD133- Cells Showed Proliferative and Long-Term Self-Renewing Abilities
Proliferation and self-renewal are critical features of stem cells. In order to further identify the stem cell feature of glioblastoma-derived CD133+ cells, we next tested whether these cells could proliferate and undergo long-term self-renewal in vitro. For the proliferation assay, dissociated single cells from tumor spheres were seeded on to PLL-coated coverslips and BrdU incorporation assay was performed. As shown in Fig. 2a and b, BrdU positive cell numbers increased with culturing days extending, which suggested that glioblastoma-derived CD133+ cells have proliferation capacity. Meanwhile, the results of MTT assay demonstrated that CD133+ cells displayed higher proliferation and survival than CD133- cells (Fig. 2c).
We then compared the self-renewal capacity of CD133+ cells and CD133- cells through limiting dilution assay. CD133+ tumor spheres were mechanically dissociated into single cells and adherent CD133- cells were trypsinized before being reseeded at serial dilutions from 200 cells/well to 6 cells/well, respectively. New colonies derived from CD133+ mother cells appeared within 1–7 days after reseeding. However, CD133- cells seemed not to form new colony. Percentage of wells without newly-formed spheres was plotted against the number of cells per well were plotted (Fig. 3a). Subsphere-forming efficiency of CD133+ cells and CD133- cells calculated through the regression line was 4.30 ± 1.02 and 0, respectively (Fig. 3b). These results indicated that CD133+ cells exhibited proliferative and self-renewal ability, whereas CD133- cells did not under the same condition. In our experiment, glioblastoma-derived CD133+ cells could be passaged multiple times through mechanical dissociation of large spheres, and could be maintained for at least 6 months if being replated in fresh proliferation medium every 1 week.
Glioblastoma-Derived CD133+ Cells Could Differentiate into Astrocytes
In addition to proliferation and self-renewal, differentiation also constitutes an essential characteristic of stem cells. To explore whether Glioblastoma-derived CD133+ cells can differentiate into various cell types, the new colonies derived from CD133+ mother cells were dissociated into single cells and allowed to differentiate for 7 days. Then cells were immunostained with antibodies against β tubulin-III for neurons, GFAP for astrocytes, and CNPase for oligodendrocytes. However, the results showed that CD133+ cells could only differentiate into astrocyte, but no neuron and oligodendrocyte (Fig. 4). Based on the above results that glioblastoma-derived CD133+ cells displayed marked stem cell activity including proliferation, long-term self-renewal and differentiation, we can draw the conclusion that the CD133+ represented a specific subpopulation of glioblastoma cells with some stem cell features, which were subsequently denoted as glioblastoma-derived stem-like cells (GDSCs).
Brain Tumor Cells Could Facilitate GDSCs Proliferation
Lines of evidence showed that the microenvironment surrounding tumor stem cells played an important role in regulating their behavior. To examine a possible influence of non-stem cells in the glioblastoma tissue on GDSCs, we established co-culture system with Millicell chamber. In our experiment, various feeder cells (non-stem cells) including primary astrocyte (Fig. 5Ca), U87MG cells (Fig. 5Cb), unsorted glioblastoma cells (Fig. 5Cc), and CD133- cells sorted from glioblastoma (Fig. 5Cd) were cultured in the apical compartment respectively, while GDSCs were co-cultured in the basal compartment. Immunocytochemistry was performed to detect BrdU incorporation after 5-day co-culture (Fig. 6a) and proportions of BrdU positive cells to Hoechst 33342 positive cells were quantified (Fig. 6b). The results showed that after being co-cultured with tumor cells including U87MG, primary glioblastoma and CD133- cells, GDSCs displayed more distinct proliferation than with primary astrocyte from normal rat brain. But there were no obvious difference between the influence of mixed cell culture from glioblastoma and sorted CD133- cells. These results implied that brain tumor microenvironment might facilitate GDSCs proliferation compared with non-tumor microenvironment.
Growth Factor Released in the co-culture System Possibly Promoted GDSCs Proliferation
Results above suggested that brain tumor cells could promote GDSCs proliferation. Moreover, this effect was \probably mediated by soluble factors released from the co-cultured cells because this system excluded direct contact between feeder cells and GDSCs. Therefore, to explore potential molecular mechanisms underlying the favorable microenvironment for GDSCs proliferation, we collected conditioned medium from the co-culture system as well as separately cultured cells and detected five growth factors through dot blot assay. As shown in Fig. 7, no growth factors were detected in supernatant from GDSCs. Unsorted glioblastoma cells and CD133- cells themselves only expressed low level of BDNF and NT3, similar to astrocyte, whereas all the five growth factors were found in U87MG. Interestingly, when GDSCs were co-cultured with tumor cells including U87MG, glioblastoma tumor cells and CD133- cells, conditioned medium all displayed VEGF and BDNF immunoreactivity (Fig. 8). However, the level of TGF-β, NT-3 and NGF was higher in conditioned medium derived from GDSCs co-cultured with glioblastoma tumor cells and CD133- cells comprared with U87MG. No such growth factors were detected in conditioned medium derived from co-culture of GDSCs with primary astrocyte.
Discussion
Recent researches suggest that brain tumor stem cells are responsible for tumor initiation and the chemoresistance and radioresistance of brain tumors, making it a promising target in clinical therapy of glioblastoma [24–27].
CD133, a cell surface protein expressed in several types of stem cells, has been widely used as a specific marker in isolating tumor stem cells from glioblastoma specimens and cell lines in many studies. However, it remained controversial that only CD133+ cells of glioblastoma have tumor-initiating potential, indicated by the fact that a subset of primary glioblastomas might stem from previously unknown CD133- tumor cells with apparent stem cell-like properties. Additionally, CD133- glioma cells can give rise to CD133+ cells [28, 29]. Nonetheless, it should be noted that CD133- glioblastomas were characterized by a lower proliferation index clinically compared with CD133+ glioblastomas [30]. Therefore, we focused on the study of CD133+ cells.
In this study, we successfully enriched CD133+ cells from human glioblastoma specimens and confirmed their self-renewing, proliferative and neurosphere-forming capacity. However, upon the removal of mitogens, the CD133+ cells only differentiated into astrocyte but not neuron and oligodendrocyte as reported before [31]. As proposed by Buick et al. [32] and Singh et al. [6], malignant transformation might limit the differentiation capacity of normal pluripotent stem cells and tumor stem cells were probably lineage-restricted and mainly differentiated into the cell type that comprised the tumor. In addition, variation in location of specimens in the brain, sex and age of the patient might also lead to difference in some properties of tumor stem cells. Further studies are required to probe into the detailed mechanisms.
Since tumor tissue is characterized as a phenotype and functional cellular heterogeneity containing tumor initiating cells (stem cells), committed cells and other support cells, these non-stem cells inevitably have an influence on the tumor stem cells both directly and indirectly. Previous studies showed that endothelial cells interact closely with self-renewing brain tumor cells and secrete factors that maintain these cells in a stem cell-like state [33]. In this study, we explored the effect of non-stem cells in tumor tissue on GDSCs using a co-culture system. Intriguingly, GDSCs showed strong proliferation ability when co-cultured with tumor cells rather than with normal astrocytes. Moreover, unsorted cells and CD133- cells from glioblastoma tissue seemed to provide a more favorable environment for GDSCs proliferation compared with U87MG. It is noteworthy that there was no direct contact between GDSCs and the feeder cells in this co-culture system, which highlighted the possibility that soluble factors released from the co-cultured system with tumor cells promoted the proliferation of GDSCs cells.
Based on previous researches, it was assumed that tumor stem cells may arise from a microenvironment with dominant growth-promoting signals rather than growth inhibitors [34], The neurotrophin family members BDNF, NT-3 and NGF are known to impact brain tumor cells functions including viability, proliferation and migration. Their receptors TrkB, TrkC and TrkA receptors have been identified on glioblastoma. Moreover, the low affinity receptor p75 is also involved in the metastatic potential in glioblastoma [35–38]. TGF-β signaling results in various biological effects involving growth, differentiation and morphogenesis of brain tumors. It has been proposed that the tumor promoting activity of TGF-β could be a fundamental target in human glioma cell malignancy [39]. VEGF is highly expressed in malignant glioma and has been identified as a critical regulator of angiogenesis. Studies also showed that VEGF-specific inhibitors like Bevacizumab might impact brain tumor growth by targeting both a vascular niche and the associated tumor stem cells [33].
In our experiment, growth factors mentioned above were detected in the conditioned medium from the co-cultures as well as separately cultured cells. It is interesting that the combination of GDSCs and non-stem cells during the co-culture led to a distinct variation in the growth factor expression profile of the analyzed supernatants compared to the single approaches. Since VEGF, TGF-β and NGF were not present in the separately cultured GDSCs, unsorted cells and CD133- cells, the assumption of an interaction between GDSCs and the co-cultured cells could be suggested, which led to the secretion of these factors. Additionally, the high expression level of growth factors in the co-culture system with tumor cells seemed to correlate with high proliferation rate of GDSCs, suggesting that abnormal growth factor expression in tumor microenvironment probably lead to uncontrolled proliferation of tumor stem cells. Furthermore, it’s likely that these factors help to maintain the complex microenvironment of brain tumors in a synergic way to facilitate tumor stem-like cells proliferation, which might result from the interaction of endocellular signaling pathways of each factor. Of note, secretion of some factors by separately cultured astrocyte and U87MG seemed to be inhibited when they were co-cultured with GDSCs. Similar results were observed in previous study [40]. However, the underlying mechanisms remained to be further elucidated.
In conclusion, the present studies demonstrated that tumor cells in microenvironment could facilitate tumor stem cells proliferation, which was partially attributed to soluble growth factors released from the microenvironment. Therefore, tumor stem cells together with its microenvironment will become an intriguing target for novel therapeutic drugs and strategies development for brain tumor therapy in the future.
Abbreviations
- GDSCs:
-
Glioblastoma-derived stem-like cells
- BDNF:
-
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
- VEGF:
-
Vascular endothelial growth factor
- NGF:
-
Nerve growth factor
- TGF-β:
-
Transforming growth factor-β
- NT-3:
-
Neurotrophin-3
References
Vescovi AL, Galli R, Reynolds BA (2006) Brain tumour stem cells. Nature reviews 6(6):425–436
Oliver TG, Wechsler-Reya RJ (2004) Getting at the root and stem of brain tumors. Neuron 42(6):885–888
DeAngelis LM (2001) Brain tumors. N Engl J Med 344(2):114–123
Kondo T, Setoguchi T, Taga T (2004) Persistence of a small subpopulation of cancer stem-like cells in the C6 glioma cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(3):781–786
Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, Squire JA, Bayani J, Hide T, Henkelman RM, Cusimano MD, Dirks PB (2004) Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature 432(7015):396–401
Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, Bonn VE, Hawkins C, Squire J, Dirks PB (2003) Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res 63(18):5821–5828
Pfenninger CV, Roschupkina T, Hertwig F, Kottwitz D, Englund E, Bengzon J, Jacobsen SE, Nuber UA (2007) CD133 is not present on neurogenic astrocytes in the adult subventricular zone, but on embryonic neural stem cells, ependymal cells, and glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res 67(12):5727–5736
Campos LS (2005) Beta1 integrins and neural stem cells: making sense of the extracellular environment. Bioessays 27(7):698–707
Ohlstein B, Kai T, Decotto E, Spradling A (2004) The stem cell niche: theme and variations. Curr Opin Cell Biol 16(6):693–699
Spradling A, Drummond-Barbosa D, Kai T (2001) Stem cells find their niche. Nature 414(6859):98–104
Watt FM, Hogan BL (2000) Out of Eden: stem cells and their niches. Science 287(5457):1427–1430, New York, NY
Moore KA, Lemischka IR (2006) Stem cells and their niches. Science 311(5769):1880–1885, New York, NY
Fuchs E, Tumbar T, Guasch G (2004) Socializing with the neighbors: stem cells and their niche. Cell 116(6):769–778
Reynolds BA, Weiss S (1992) Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 255(5052):1707–1710, New York, NY
McCarthy KD, de Vellis J (1980) Preparation of separate astroglial and oligodendroglial cell cultures from rat cerebral tissue. The Journal of cell biology 85(3):890–902
Schwartz JP, Wilson DJ (1992) Preparation and characterization of type 1 astrocytes cultured from adult rat cortex, cerebellum, and striatum. Glia 5(1):75–80
Tropepe V, Sibilia M, Ciruna BG, Rossant J, Wagner EF, van der Kooy D (1999) Distinct neural stem cells proliferate in response to EGF and FGF in the developing mouse telencephalon. Dev Biol 208(1):166–188
Bellows CG, Aubin JE (1989) Determination of numbers of osteoprogenitors present in isolated fetal rat calvaria cells in vitro. Dev Biol 133(1):8–13
Liao H, Huang W, Schachner M, Guan Y, Guo J, Yan J, Qin J, Bai X, Zhang L (2008) Beta 1 integrin-mediated effects of tenascin-R domains EGFL and FN6-8 on neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation in vitro. J Biol Chem 283(41):27927–27936
Shen Q, Goderie SK, Jin L, Karanth N, Sun Y, Abramova N, Vincent P, Pumiglia K, Temple S (2004) Endothelial cells stimulate self-renewal and expand neurogenesis of neural stem cells. Science 304(5675):1338–1340, New York, NY
Lendahl U, Zimmerman LB, McKay RD (1990) CNS stem cells express a new class of intermediate filament protein. Cell 60(4):585–595
Yin AH, Miraglia S, Zanjani ED, Almeida-Porada G, Ogawa M, Leary AG, Olweus J, Kearney J, Buck DW (1997) AC133, a novel marker for human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood 90(12):5002–5012
Uchida N, Buck DW, He D, Reitsma MJ, Masek M, Phan TV, Tsukamoto AS, Gage FH, Weissman IL (2000) Direct isolation of human central nervous system stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(26):14720–14725
Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y, Shi Q, Hjelmeland AB, Dewhirst MW, Bigner DD, Rich JN (2006) Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature 444(7120):756–760
Eramo A, Ricci-Vitiani L, Zeuner A, Pallini R, Lotti F, Sette G, Pilozzi E, Larocca LM, Peschle C, De Maria R (2006) Chemotherapy resistance of glioblastoma stem cells. Cell death and differentiation 13(7):1238–1241
Liu G, Yuan X, Zeng Z, Tunici P, Ng H, Abdulkadir IR, Lu L, Irvin D, Black KL, Yu JS (2006) Analysis of gene expression and chemoresistance of CD133+ cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Molecular cancer 5:67
Piccirillo SG, Binda E, Fiocco R, Vescovi AL, Shah K (2009) Brain cancer stem cells. Journal of molecular medicine. Berlin, Germany
Wang J, Sakariassen PO, Tsinkalovsky O, Immervoll H, Boe SO, Svendsen A, Prestegarden L, Rosland G, Thorsen F, Stuhr L, Molven A, Bjerkvig R, Enger PO (2008) CD133 negative glioma cells form tumors in nude rats and give rise to CD133 positive cells. Int J Cancer 122(4):761–768
Joo KM, Kim SY, Jin X, Song SY, Kong DS, Lee JI, Jeon JW, Kim MH, Kang BG, Jung Y, Jin J, Hong SC, Park WY, Lee DS, Kim H, Nam DH (2008) Clinical and biological implications of CD133-positive and CD133-negative cells in glioblastomas. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology 88(8):808–815
Beier D, Hau P, Proescholdt M, Lohmeier A, Wischhusen J, Oefner PJ, Aigner L, Brawanski A, Bogdahn U, Beier CP (2007) CD133(+) and CD133(−) glioblastoma-derived cancer stem cells show differential growth characteristics and molecular profiles. Cancer Res 67(9):4010–4015
Galli R, Binda E, Orfanelli U, Cipelletti B, Gritti A, De Vitis S, Fiocco R, Foroni C, Dimeco F, Vescovi A (2004) Isolation and characterization of tumorigenic, stem-like neural precursors from human glioblastoma. Cancer Res 64(19):7011–7021
Buick RN, Minden MD, McCulloch EA (1979) Self-renewal in culture of proliferative blast progenitor cells in acute myeloblastic leukemia. Blood 54(1):95–104
Calabrese C, Poppleton H, Kocak M, Hogg TL, Fuller C, Hamner B, Oh EY, Gaber MW, Finklestein D, Allen M, Frank A, Bayazitov IT, Zakharenko SS, Gajjar A, Davidoff A, Gilbertson RJ (2007) A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells. Cancer cell 11(1):69–82
Li L, Neaves WB (2006) Normal stem cells and cancer stem cells: the niche matters. Cancer Res 66(9):4553–4557
Hansen K, Wagner B, Hamel W, Schweizer M, Haag F, Westphal M, Lamszus K (2007) Autophagic cell death induced by TrkA receptor activation in human glioblastoma cells. J Neurochem 103(1):259–275
Schmidt AL, de Farias CB, Abujamra AL, Kapczinski F, Schwartsmann G, Brunetto AL, Roesler R (2009) BDNF and PDE4, but not the GRPR. Regulate Viability of Human Medulloblastoma Cells, J Mol Neurosci
Gruber-Olipitz M, Strobel T, Kang SU, John JP, Grotzer MA, Slavc I, Lubec G (2009) Neurotrophin 3/TrkC-regulated proteins in the human medulloblastoma cell line DAOY. Electrophoresis 30(3):540–549
Bassili M, Birman E, Schor NF, Saragovi HU (2009) Differential roles of Trk and p75 neurotrophin receptors in tumorigenesis and chemoresistance ex vivo and in vivo. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
Golestaneh N, Mishra B (2005) TGF-beta, neuronal stem cells and glioblastoma. Oncogene 24(37):5722–5730
Petschnik AE, Fell B, Tiede S, Habermann JK, Pries R, Kruse C, Danner S A novel xenogeneic co-culture system to examine neuronal differentiation capability of various adult human stem cells. PloS one 6 (9):e24944
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(81070967/H0909), Natural Science Foundation of Jiang Su Province(No. BK2009296) and Initial Fund of China Pharmaceutical University to Dr. Hong Liao.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
JingJing Guo and Rui Niu contributed equally to this work
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, J., Niu, R., Huang, W. et al. Growth Factors from Tumor Microenvironment Possibly Promote the Proliferation of Glioblastoma-Derived Stem-like Cells in Vitro . Pathol. Oncol. Res. 18, 1047–1057 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-012-9543-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-012-9543-7