Abstract
Tidal wetlands are affected by sea level rise. In the tidal freshwater stretches of estuaries in the temperate zone, willows (Salix spp.) form tidal freshwater forests above the mean high water level. Willows tolerance to prolonged periodic flooding in riverine systems is well documented, whereas effects of tidal flooding on willows are largely unknown. Flooding stress may play a major role in regeneration failure of willows in tidal forest stands along estuarine shores, and juvenile willows might be specifically affected by partial or total submergence. To assess the tolerance of juvenile willows to tidal flooding, we conducted a mesocosm experiment with cuttings from Salix alba and Salix viminalis, which are both characteristic species for tidal freshwater forests in Europe. Cuttings originating from either fresh or brackish tidal forest stands were grown under four tidal treatments with up to a tidal flooding of 60 cm. A general tolerance to a tidal flooding of 60 cm was observed in chlorophyll fluorescence, growth rates, and biomass production in both willow species. Overall, S. alba showed higher leaf and shoot growth, whereas S. viminalis produced more biomass. S. alba with brackish origin performed worst with increasing tidal flooding, suggesting a possible pre-weakening due to stressful site conditions in tidal wetlands at the estuarine brackish stretch. This study demonstrates that juvenile willows of S. alba and S. viminalis tolerate tidal flooding of up to 60 cm. It is concluded that tidal inundation acts as a stress by causing submergence and soil anaerobiosis, but may also act as a subsidy by reestablishing aerobic conditions and thus maintaining willows performance. Therefore, we suggest investigations on Salix tidal flooding tolerance and possible effects of willows on tidal wetland accretion under estuarine field conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Coastal wetlands are becoming increasingly stressed by various natural and human-induced factors such as storms, sea level rise and coastal engineering. Globally, about 35 % of the area of mangroves has disappeared since 1980 and the current global annual loss of tidal marshes is estimated to be between 1 and 2 % (Pendleton et al. 2012). Especially, estuaries with their steep gradients in energy and physicochemical properties are (in addition to direct human alterations; Ganju and Schoellhamer 2010) highly vulnerable to climate change (Jennerjahn and Mitchell 2013). For tidal freshwater wetlands, a rising sea level might both contribute to a rapid loss of area, of biodiversity (Baldwin and Mendelssohn 1998) and to vegetation changes caused by increased tidal flooding and concurrent saltwater intrusion (Neubauer and Craft 2009). However, in upstream tidal freshwater wetlands, river discharge largely prevents intrusion of saline water (Baldwin et al. 2009), and thus salt water intrusion is not expected to influence the upper reaches of today’s tidal freshwater stretches. In North American tidal freshwater wetlands, diverse forest types occur, while European tidal freshwater forests at low-lying sites (e.g., at the microtidal Rhine-Meuse, at the macrotidal Scheldt, and the Elbe) are dominated by willows (Struyf et al. 2009).
Diverse floodplain willow species (genus Salix) benefit from their adaptations to the floodplain stressors like flooding (Karrenberg et al. 2002) and disturbance (Timoney and Argus 2006) by their high regeneration capacity (Ellenberg and Leuschner 2010). Moreover, floodplain willows contribute to ecosystem services like attenuating river currents and stabilizing river bank sediments (Radtke et al. 2012). Temmerman et al. (2004) found varying sediment deposition rates along the Scheldt estuary depending on the age of the tidal wetlands and controlled by mean high water level (MHWL) rise and suspended sediment concentration. At the Elbe estuary, accretion rates in low-lying tidal wetlands were found to be higher (5.8–20.3 mm year−1) than current sea level rise indicating that these ecosystems may keep pace with sea level rise. By contrast, lower accretion rates were found at high elevations (1.1–3.1 mm year−1) with less inundation (Butzeck et al. 2014): These tidal wetlands may become more inundated in the future, leading again to increasing accretion rates here. However, in the upper reaches of temperate estuaries, tidal freshwater wetlands at high elevations may be vulnerable to sea level rise due to insufficient sediment deposition rates (Butzeck et al. 2014). Here, the ability of tidal wetlands to keep pace with rising sea level might be also limited as the watershed sediment delivery is often largely reduced (Weston 2014). Although Kirwan et al. (2010) generally assess tidal wetlands in macrotidal estuaries with high sediment loads to likely remain stable, tidal wetlands which developed during periods of high sediment deposition in the past might submerge as sediment supplies decreases, e.g., due to dam construction. The future location of tidal freshwater forests might be expected to shift to more elevated landward sites with sea level rise. However, coastal engineering with dike construction largely prevents the landward movement of floodplain vegetation and restricts the extension of tidal wetlands in Europe (Doody 2004). Thus, today’s willow habitat might be affected by a projected moderate sea level rise of up to 60 cm until 2081–2100 (IPCC 2013), and floodplain forest regeneration by small and juvenile willows might be specifically threatened by increasing tidal flooding and submergence.
Effects of increasing water levels on floodplain willows of the intertidal zone are not well studied yet. Salix alba L. and Salix viminalis L. (hereafter referred to as S. alba and S. viminalis) are the most widespread willows in the floodplains of the Elbe estuary (Raabe 1986) and characteristic willow species in floodplains in temperate zones in Europe (Struyf et al. 2009) and thus served as our study species. S. alba forms floodplain forests above mean high water level, whereas S. viminalis forms shrubby belts at the floodplain forest edge at lower elevations above the reed zone (Ellenberg and Leuschner 2010). It is thus expected that the species differ in their flooding tolerance with S. viminalis being more flooding tolerant. Moreover, the phenotype of plants as the result of the interaction between the genotype and the environment may lead to locally adapted populations in heterogeneous environments (Schmid 1992), and Markus-Michalczyk et al. (2014) demonstrated that S. alba and S. viminalis cuttings originating from tidal freshwater and from brackish water wetlands differ in their salt tolerance. As S. viminalis specimens with a brackish origin have a higher stress tolerance to salinity and this may have physiological costs, it is expected that specimens with brackish origin have lower flooding tolerance than those with freshwater origin. We state that the floodplain willow species S. alba L. and S. viminalis L. are able to tolerate tidal freshwater flooding of a magnitude projected in moderate climate change scenarios. Specifically, we aimed to answer the questions (i) if juvenile willows tolerate tidal flooding until a critical value of total submergence is reached, (ii) if S. viminalis shows a higher flooding tolerance than S. alba plants, and (iii) if plants with brackish origin show lower flooding tolerance compared to freshwater origin due to physiological costs of pre-adaptation to salinity.
Material and Methods
From May to October 2012, a mesocosm experiment was conducted with four tidal freshwater treatments in the common garden at the University of Hamburg (N53.561, E9.858; 15 °C mean air temperature and 200 mm precipitation June–October 2012): Hamburg is located in the temperate zone with 9 °C mean annual air temperature and a mean of 793 mm precipitation per year (DWD 1981-2010; http://www.dwd.de/). Juvenile willow plants of (i) two Salix species (S. alba and S. viminalis), (ii) from two origins (freshwater and brackish water site) were exposed to (iii) four tidal freshwater flooding regimes (0m, 20, 40, 60 cm).
Plant Material
Plant material was collected from two tidal wetland sites along the Elbe estuary differing in salinity. The first site was located at the lower mesohaline stretch (N53.533, E9.152; hereafter referred to as brackish site) and the other site at the upper limnic stretch of the estuary (N53.283, E10.219; hereafter referred to as freshwater site). At each site, S. alba and S. viminalis specimens with straight shoots were selected. Twelve specimens per species—six of both origins—were used as sources for cuttings. We harvested 24 cuttings on March 28 and 29, 2012, from each of the selected specimen (576 in total) and kept the plant material in plastic bags in a climate chamber at 5 °C until March 30. The planting substrate used in the experiment was composed by half river sand and half compost as organic component. Both components were mixed and sieved, and pots (18-cm diameter, 14-cm high) were filled with the planting substrate. The cuttings were equalized to 20-cm length, and the initial mass was determined on March 30. In each filled pot, two cuttings of one species and a single origin were placed into the planting substrate and watered with spring water. In order to protect them from frost and damaging UV radiation, the cuttings were at first stored in a greenhouse for 4 weeks and then exposed to field conditions in the open. After that time period, the cutting with fewer developed leaves was removed from each of the pots. The remaining cuttings were grown to juvenile willows and served as plant material in the experiment.
Tidal Treatments
We established tidal freshwater flooding treatments in mesocosms (3 m × 1.5 m; 1.5-m high). Each of the four mesocosms contained flooding stairways of four steps, representing four flooding levels. According to Gönnert et al. (2009), the regional water level increase at the German Bight can be expected to range between 40 and 80 cm by the end of the twenty-first century. The setup of the tidal treatments corresponded to this expectation in the flooding depth on flooding stairways. Plants on the uppermost step were exposed to hydrological conditions similar to the lower field sites of both Salix species at the mean high water line, and plants on lower steps of the stairways experienced increasing flooding. The pot height was 14 cm and the differences between steps were 20 cm. The lowest flooding level of 0 cm reached the pots soil surface at the uppermost step and the highest flooding level of 80 cm reached 6 cm under the pot’s bottom at the undermost step of the flooding stairways.
Thus, the stairways were flooded by daily tides with different flooding height stepwise: (i) step one: 0 cm—flooded up to the pot’s soil surface (corresponds to sites at mean high water line); (ii) step two: 20 cm—flooded up to 20 cm above the pot’s soil surface; (iii) step three: flooded up to 40 cm above the pot’s soil surface; (iv) step four: flooded up to 60 cm above the pot’s soil surface. Sixteen pots (4 per both S. alba and S. viminalis and 4 per both freshwater and brackish origin) were arranged randomly on each of the 4 flooding steps resulting in 64 pots per mesocosms, applied in each of the 4 mesocosms adding up to 256 pots. The tidal treatments were applied from May 11 to October 17, 2012.
Tidal Simulation System
The tidal simulation system consisted of two water storage tanks and four mesocosms. The mesocosms were equipped with timer-controlled electronic pumps (Grundfos Typ Unilift CC7-A1—model 96280968) and connected to the water storage tanks. Tides were produced by water transfer between the water storage tanks and the mesocoms. During flood tide, well water was pumped from the water storage tanks via tubes into the mesocosms until the water level reached the soil surface of the pots on the uppermost step. During ebb tide, water was pumped from the mesocosms via tubes into the water storage tanks until the water level was below the bottom of the pots on the lowest step. To mimic natural conditions of the Elbe estuary, with a stronger and faster running flood tide compared to the ebb tide, the flood tide lasted 5 h and the ebb tide duration was 7 h. We set up the timer control of the electronic pump in a way that the turnaround of the tide occurred each day approximately 1 h later, similar to the daily inequality of semi-diurnal tides in natural systems, in order to adjust our tidal simulation system with the tide at the Elbe estuary.
Data Collection
Before the start of the experiment, cuttings were placed in pots and grew to juvenile willow plants from March 30 to May 11. After this period, the initial number of leaves, number of shoots and shoot length of the juvenile willow plants were determined. Then, the plants were placed on the flooding stairways in the mesocosms and the tidal treatments started. During the course of the tidal treatments, chlorophyll fluorescence and number of leaves, and number of shoots and shoot length were recorded every 2 weeks. Chlorophyll fluorescence was recorded as maximum quantum yield with a portable chlorophyll fluorometer (PAM-2100, Walz, Germany). The ratio of variable to maximal fluorescence (Fv/Fm) of dark adapted leaves was calculated as an indicator for the photosynthetic efficiency, based on the principle described by Schreiber et al. (1986).
To perform the measurements, the pots with the plants were removed from the flooding steps during simulated low tide and placed beside the mesocosms on a desk. After performing the measurements, the pots were rearranged randomly on the same flooding step they were placed before. On August 24, the aboveground biomass was harvested from each of the plants in the four mesocosms. In one of the four mesocosms, belowground biomass was also harvested. All harvested biomass was cleaned and dried separately at 60 °C to constant weight and weighed.
In order to analyze the ability of the plants to resprout under flooding conditions, the tidal treatments continued in those three mesocosms where only aboveground biomass was harvested. The number of resprouted leaves and the shoot length were recorded on October 17.
As growth could be limited by light availability during flooding, photon flux density was recorded during flooding biweekly at high noon (week 0: June 26, week 2: July 9, week 4: July 24, week 6: Aug. 7, 2013). For each flooding level in each of the four mesocosms, photon flux density was measured once in the water beside the soil surface of the pot and also in the air above the water column above the pot soil surface (LiCOR Data Logger; LI 192 UW quantum sensor), and calculated as relative irradiance in water (percentage of photon flux density in water in relation to photon flux density in air). The photon flux densities in the water decreased substantially with increasing flooding depth at each of the four biweekly measuring dates. In week 0, with overall lowest irradiance, values at 20 to 60 cm flooding dropped below 200 μmol m−2s−1. In week 4, with the second lowest irradiance, values at 60 cm flooding dropped below 200 μmol m−2s−1. In week 2 and week 6 with high irradiances, values remained above 200 μmol m−2s−1 at flooding 0 to 60 cm at noon. Relative irradiance in water generally decreased with increasing flooding depth in week 0 (F = 25.02; p < 0.001), week 2 (F = 196.99; p < 0.0001), week 4 (F = 53.71; p < 0.0001), and week 6 (F = 69.92; p < 0.0001). Here, relative irradiance in water dropped below 50 % at 40 cm flooding at each measuring date compared to irradiance on the surface. Moreover, at week 4 and week 6, values decreased below 25 % at 60 cm flooding.
Data Analyses
We applied ANOVAs to test for the effects of tidal treatments with four flooding levels (0, 20, 40, and 60 cm flooding depth) on juvenile plants of two species (S. alba and S. viminalis) from two origins (freshwater and brackish site). Repeated measurement ANOVA was applied on chlorophyll fluorescence and pairwise differences were tested with Tukey’s post hoc tests. ANCOVAs were applied on aboveground dry mass (leaf mass and shoot mass) and on belowground dry mass (root mass) as well as on total dry mass and on the shoot-root ratio. Here, initial mass served as covariate. Growth as relative growth rate of leaf number (%), and increase in shoot length compared to initial values was analyzed with repeated measurement ANOVAs. Pairwise differences were tested by applying Tukey’s post hoc tests.
Resprouting capacity was analyzed by applying repeated measurement ANOVAs on the number of resprouted leaves and the length of resprouted shoots and pairwise differences were tested with Tukey’s post hoc tests.
Prior to all analyses, Levene’s tests were applied to test for variance homogeneity. Change in total shoot length showed heteroscedasticity of variances and thus were log-transformed in order to approximate the assumptions of ANOVA. All data analyses were carried out with STATISTICA 9.0 (StatSoft 2009).
Results
Chlorophyll Fluorescence
Repeated measurement ANOVAs did not show a significant effect of tidal flooding on photosynthetic efficiency; moreover, photoinhibition of photosynthesis was not detected. Differences in chlorophyll fluorescence between S. alba and S. viminalis and between the origins were not significant. At none of the measurement dates, effects of flooding, species, or origin on photosynthetic performance were found (Appendix Table 3).
Dry Mass
Overall, dry mass of juvenile Salix plants decreased with increasing flooding level (Fig. 1; Table 1). Tukey’s HSD tests confirmed significant differences between 0 and 20 cm tidal flooding (p < 0.05), 0 and 40 cm (p < 0.01), 0 and 60 cm (p < 0.001), and between 20 and 60 cm (p < 0.001) and 40 and 60 cm tidal flooding (p < 0.001). S. viminalis produced significantly more dry mass than S. alba (p < 0.001).
The shoot-root ratio significantly increased with increasing flooding (Fig. 2; Table 1). Here, Tukey’s post hoc tests confirmed significant differences between 0 and 40 cm tidal flooding (p < 0.01) and 60 cm (p < 0.001) whereas ratios remained similar in 20 cm compared to 40 cm tidal flooding. Additionally, S. alba plants with brackish origin developed higher shoot-root ratios than with freshwater origin (p < 0.05). With regard to plants originating from the brackish site, S. alba showed higher shoot-root ratio than S. viminalis (p < 0.05).
Growth
Relative growth rate of leaf number was similar in each of the four flooding levels and no significant effect of tidal flooding was found. ANOVAs proved, however, significant differences between species and singular way interactions between time and flooding, time and species, time and origin, and time, flooding and species (Table 2). After 15 weeks of tidal treatments on juvenile willows, leaf number of S. alba was significantly higher than of S. viminalis (p < 001), and plants with a tidal freshwater wetland origin showed higher leaf numbers than those from the tidal wetland at the brackish stretch.
No significant effect of flooding on increase in shoot length was found after 15 weeks of tidal treatments. Significant differences in increase in shoot length were found between species (Table 2). S. alba shoot length after 15 weeks was significantly higher compared to initial values than S. viminalis shoot length. The interaction of time and species was found to be significant. Here, S. alba performed better at each time point except in May (p < 0.001).
Resprouting Rates in Juvenile Willows After Shoot Removal
Resprouting rates after shoot removal were 93 % in S. alba and 99 % in S. viminalis at the end of the tidal treatment. The number of resprouted leaves (Fig. 3) decreased with increasing flooding (p < 0.001). However, no significant differences in resprouted number of leaves were found between 20 and 40 cm tidal flooding treatments. Furthermore, we detected significant effects of species on the number of resprouted leaves (p < 0.001). Here, resprouted number of leaves was substantial higher in S. viminalis than in S. alba (Appendix Table 4).
Repeated measurement ANOVAs showed a temporal increasing length of resprouted shoots between three dates (p < 0.001) and decreasing shoot length with increasing flooding (p < 0.001). No significant differences in shoot length were found between 20 cm compared to 40 cm tidal flooding at all measurement dates (Fig. 4). Temporal shoot length development differed between species (p < 0.001). Resprouted shoots were substantially longer in S. viminalis than in S. alba (Appendix Table 4).
Discussion
Tolerance of Juvenile Willow Plants to Tidal Flooding
The study clearly demonstrates that juvenile plants of the floodplain willow species Salix alba L. and Salix viminalis L. are able to tolerate tidal freshwater flooding at least to the maximum applied tidal flooding depth of 60 cm. Furthermore, both species were found to have a high resprouting capacity of more than 90 % after shoot removal even under submergence. These findings have to be viewed against the background of differences in the effects which changing water levels in tidal systems with alternating flooding and exposure may cause in comparison with stagnant water levels and long-term submergence.
In our tidal treatments, plants experienced alternating flooding and exposure to high-light conditions. Here, photosynthetic activity of juvenile willows was generally optimal (no decrease of Fv/Fm), although plants growing in low-light habitats are usually sensitive to high UV radiation (Hanelt and Roleda 2009). Intertidal zones, where plants are suddenly exposed to UV radiation after flooding during high water, are habitats with potential for induction of damage by high photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) or UV radiation (Hanelt et al. 1997). Post-submergence growth recovery requires also efficient photosynthetic acclimation to increased O2 and irradiance to minimize photo-oxidative damage (Luo et al. 2009). This is in agreement with our results of photosynthetic activity (Fv/Fm) and plants growth which remained optimal after tidal flooding indicating an adaptation to the tidal floodplain habitat.
At complete submergence, gas diffusion dramatically decreases and limits the entry of CO2 for photosynthesis and of O2 for respiration (Colmer and Pedersen 2008). Accordingly, the significant decrease in dry mass at increasing flooding depth might be viewed as an effect of short-term complete submergence. This finding might also be caused by the decreased light availability with increasing water depth, which might drop below the light compensation point (Sand-Jensen and Borum 1991). In our experiment, irradiance dropped several times below 200 μmol m−2s−1 so energy need for biomass production might have become light limited. Sufficient light supply underwater increases the survival of submerged terrestrial plants (Mommer and Visser 2005), and submerged plants usually require at least appr. 30 % of the incident light measured just below the water surface (Dennison et al. 1993). Thus, the decrease of the impinging light down to 50 % of surface irradiance observed at a flooding depth of 40 cm, and down to 25 % at 60 cm might have caused the significant reduction in dry mass in the juvenile willows in the tidal treatments.
In flooded soils, filling of soil pores with water lowers oxygen supply for roots (Blom and Voesenek 1996). The increasing shoot-root ratio at increasing flooding might thus indicate physiological stress on roots. In Amazonian Salix martiana, a high capacity to produce adventitious roots was found in the field during flooding and in an experiment under stagnant submergence (Parolin et al. 2002; De Simone et al. 2002). However, plants in our experiment with tidally changing water levels did not produce adventitious roots. The decreased root compared to shoot dry mass is typical for many wetland plants exhibiting reduced root mass with increased flooding (Mitsch and Gosselink 2000), In agreement with this, a North American floodplain willow (Salix nigra) showed decreased root biomass in a waterlogged soil compared to drained conditions (Li et al. 2006), and cuttings of mid European floodplain willows showed reduced root mass production in waterlogged compared to moist conditions (Radtke et al. 2012).
Interspecific Differences in Tidal Flooding Tolerance of Juvenile Willow Plants
Interspecific differences in tidal flooding tolerance of juvenile willows varied according to measured parameters in our experiment. In the first instance, higher dry mass and greater resprouting capacity in juvenile plants of the shrubby S. viminalis compared to the arboreal S. alba seem to support our hypothesis of a higher tolerance of S. viminalis to tidal flooding. A better growth performance of floodplain shrubs compared to floodplain trees under severe abiotic disturbance at the floodplain edge at low elevations was also reported earlier (e.g. Amlin and Rood 2001; Francis and Gurnell 2006). However, a large overlap of areas with suitable hydrologic conditions for both floodplain trees and shrubs was identified by modeling for the Elbe river floodplains (Mosner et al. 2011). Here, mechanical disturbance was differentiating species niches at low-lying sites. In general, shrubby vegetation with high resprouting capacity from flood-damaged stumps dominates at flood-prone sites (Bendix and Hupp 2000). Thus, the higher dry mass and higher resprouting capacity of juvenile S. viminalis in our experiment may be rather an outcome of adaptations to mechanical disturbance than of a higher tolerance to tidal flooding.
By contrast, we assess S. alba to be more tolerant to tidal flooding. In the flooding treatments, leaf number increased substantially more over time in S. alba than in S. viminalis. Leaf surface characteristic might serve as a possible explanation for this interspecific difference. Leaves of S. alba are covered with hydrophobic hairs on the upper and lower leaf surface (Lautenschlager-Fleury 1994; Zander 2000), whereas leaves of S. viminalis are hairy beneath only. Leaf gas films on completely submerged rice facilitate gas exchange and thus, have been termed “plant plastrons” (Pedersen et al. 2009). Beneficial effects of leaf gas films on internal aeration during tidal submergence were shown for Spartina anglica (Winkel et al. 2011). Different capacities to develop leaf gas films of S. alba and S. viminalis may partly explain the higher leaf growth of S. alba. However, specific investigations on effects of gas films on Salix leaves and photosynthetic activity are needed to confirm this hypothesis. Generally, better leaf performance in S. alba juvenile plants and larger increase in shoot length might be due to overall better tolerance to prolonged flooding of this species (Chmelař and Meusel 1986; Lautenschlager-Fleury 1994). Borsje et al. (2011) highlight the ability of S. alba to cope with long inundation periods as a criteria for its use in flood protection measurements to trap sediment and damp waves.
Effects of Origin on Tidal Flooding Tolerance of Juvenile Willow Plants
Effects of different origins on tidal flooding tolerance in juvenile S. alba and S. viminalis plants were marginal in our experiment, although generally high within-population genetic variability in the genus Salix may be assumed due to disturbance-driven vegetation dynamics in floodplains (Karrenberg et al. 2002). Significant differences related to the plants origin were found only in S. alba. Here, a higher shoot-root ratio and lower dry mass were detected in plants with origin from the brackish site compared to freshwater origin. In addition, a pronounced decrease in performance of plants with origin from the brackish site was found with increasing tidal flooding, which might be caused by the pre-adaptation of the plants to higher salinity at these sites (Markus-Michalczyk et al. 2014).
Conclusion
For the first time, a tolerance to tidal flooding up to 60 cm was found for juvenile willows of Salix alba and Salix viminalis, both characteristic species in European forested tidal freshwater wetlands. We conclude that periodic tidal inundation acts as a stress by causing submergence and soil anaerobiosis but also as a subsidy by reestablishing aerobic conditions maintaining the functionality of the photosynthetic apparatus and willows performance in tidal wetlands.
However, vegetation was also found to play an important role in long-term development of tidal wetlands: In mangroves and salt marshes, vegetation increases sediment accretion and contributes to wave reduction (Krauss et al. 2014; Möller et al. 2014). The role of willows in tidal freshwater wetlands for surface accretion rates has not been investigated yet, but is of importance for the fate of this ecosystem under sea level rise, the conservation of willow softwood forests as priority habitats, and the protection of tidal wetlands as Ramsar cites (Ramsar 2014). We thus suggest investigations on Salix tidal flooding tolerance and possible effects of willows on tidal wetland accretion under estuarine field conditions.
References
Amlin N.A., and S.B. Rood. 2001. Inundation tolerances of riparian willows and cottonwoods. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37: 1709–1720.
Baldwin A.H., and I.A. Mendelssohn. 1998. Response of two oligohaline marsh communities to lethal and nonlethal disturbance. Oecologia 116: 543–555.
Baldwin A.H., A. Barendregt, and D.F. Whigham. 2009. Tidal freshwater wetlands, an introduction to the ecosystem. In Tidal freshwater wetlands, eds. A. Barendregt, D.F. Whigham, and A.H. Baldwin, 1–10. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.
Bendix J., and C.R. Hupp. 2000. Hydrological and geomorphological impacts on riparian plant communities. Hydrological Processes 14: 2977–2990.
Blom C.W.P.M., and L.A.C.J. Voesenek. 1996. Flooding: the survival strategies of plants. Tree II: RO. 7.
Borsje B.W., B.K. van Wesenbeeck, F. Dekker, P. Paalvast, T.J. Bouma, M.M. van Katwijk, and M.B. de Vries. 2011. How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection. Ecological Engineering 37: 113–122.
Butzeck C., A. Eschenbach, A. Gröngröft, K. Hansen, S. Nolte, and K. Jensen. 2014. Sediment deposition and accretion rates in tidal marshes are highly variable along estuarine salinity and flooding gradients. Estuaries and Coasts 38: 434–450.
Chmelař J., and W. Meusel. 1986. Die weiden Europas. Wittenberg Lutherstadt: Ziemsen Verlag.
Colmer T.D., and O. Pedersen. 2008. Underwater photosynthesis and respiration in leaves of submerged wetland plants: gas films improve CO2 and O2 exchange. New Phytologist 177: 918–926 8.
Dennison W.C., R.J. Orth, K.A. Moore, J.C. Stevensen, V. Carter, S. Kollar, P.W. Bergstrom, and A. Batiuk. 1993. Assessing water quality with submersed aquatic vegetation. Bioscience 43: 86–94.
De Simone O., E. Müller, W.J. Junk, and W. Schmidt. 2002. Adaptations of central amazon tree species to prolonged flooding: root morphology and leaf longevity. Plant Biology 4: 515–522.
Doody J.P. 2004. ‘Coastal squeeze’—an historical perspective. Journal of Coastal Conservation 10: 129–138.
Ellenberg H., and C. Leuschner. 2010. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen, 6 edn. Stuttgart: Ulmer.
Francis R.A., and A.M. Gurnell. 2006. Initial establishment of vegetative fragments within the active zone of a braided gravel-bed river (River Tagliamento, NE Italy). Wetlands 26: 641–648.
Ganju N.K., and D.H. Schoellhamer. 2010. Decadal-timescale estuarine geomorphic change under future scenarios of climate and sediment supply. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 15–29.
Gönnert G., H. von Storch, J. Jensen, S. Thumm, T. Wahl, and R. Weise. 2009. Der Meeresspiegelanstieg. Ursachen, Tendenzen und Risikobewertung. Die Küste 76: 225–256.
Hanelt D., and M.Y. Roleda. 2009. UVB radiation may ameliorate photoinhibition in specific shallow-water tropical marine macrophytes. Aquatic Botany 91: 6–12.
Hanelt D., C. Wiencke, and W. Nultsch. 1997. Influence of UV radiation on the photosynthesis of Arctic macroalgae in the field. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 38: 40–47.
IPCC. 2013. In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis—working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, eds. T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.K. Plattner, M.M.B. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley. Switzerland: IPCC.
Jennerjahn T.C., and S.B. Mitchell. 2013. Pressures, stresses, shocks and trends in estuarine ecosystems—an introduction and synthesis. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 130: 1–8.
Karrenberg S., P.J. Edwards, and J. Kollmann. 2002. The life history of Salicaceae living in the active zone of floodplains. Freshwater Biology 47: 733–748.
Kirwan M.L., G.R. Guntenspergen, A. D’Alpaos, J.T. Morris, S.M. Mudd, and S. Temmerman. 2010. Limits on the adaptability of coastal marshes to rising sea level. Geophysical Research Letters 37(23): 1–5.
Krauss K.W., K.L. McKee, C.E. Lovelock, D.R. Cahoon, N. Saintilan, R. Reef, and L. Chen. 2014. How mangrove forests adjust to rising sea level. New Phytologist 202: 19–34.
Lautenschlager-Fleury D. 1994. Die Weiden von mittel- und Nordeuropa: Bestimmungsschlüssel und Artbeschreibung für die Gattung Salix L. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Li S., S.R. Pezeshki, and D.F. Shields. 2006. Partial flooding enhances aeration in adventitious roots of black willow (Salix nigra) cuttings. Journal of Plant Physiology 163: 619–628.
Luo F.-L., K.A. Nagel, B. Zeng, U. Schurr, and S. Matsubara. 2009. Photosynthetic acclimation is important for post-submergence recovery of photosynthesis and growth in two riparian species. Annals of Botany 104: 1435–1444.
Markus-Michalczyk H., D. Hanelt, K. Ludewig, D. Müller, B. Schröter, and K. Jensen. 2014. Salt intrusion in tidal wetlands: European willow species tolerate oligohaline conditions. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 136: 35–42.
Mitsch W.J., and J.G. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands, 3 edn. New York: 920 ppWiley.
Möller I., M. Kudella, F. Rupprecht, T. Spencer, M. Paul, B.K. van Wesenbeeck, G. Wolters, K. Jensen, T.J. Bouma, and S. Schimmels. 2014. Wave attenuation over coastal salt marshes under storm surge conditions. Nature Geoscience 7: 727–731.
Mommer L., and E. Visser. 2005. Underwater photosynthesis in flooded terrestrial plants: a matter of leaf plasticity. Annals of Botany 96: 581–589.
Mosner E., S. Schneider, B. Lehmann, and I. Leyer. 2011. Hydrological prerequisites for optimum habitats of riparian Salix communities—identifying suitable reforestation sites. Applied Vegetation Science 14: 367–377.
Neubauer S.C., and C.B. Craft. 2009. Global change and tidal freshwater wetlands: scenarios and impacts. In Tidal freshwater wetlands, eds. A. Barendregt, D.F. Whigham, and A.H. Baldwin, 253–263. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.
Parolin P., A.C. Oliviera, M.T.F. Piedade, F. Wittmann, and W.J. Junk. 2002. Pioneer trees in Amazonian floodplains: three key species form monospecific stands in different habitats. Folia Geobotanica 37: 225–238.
Pedersen O., S.M. Rich, and T.D. Colmer. 2009. Surviving floods: leaf gas films improve O2 and CO2 exchange, root aeration, and growth of completely submerged rice. The Plant Journal 58: 147–156.
Pendleton L., D.C. Donato, B.C. Murray, S. Crooks, W.A. Jenkins, S. Sifleet, C. Craft, J.W. Fourqurean, J.B. Kauffmann, N. Marba’, P. Megonigal, E. Pidgeon, D. Herr, D. Gordon, and A. Baldera. 2012. Estimating global “blue carbon” emissions from conversion and degradation of vegetated coastal ecosystems. PloS One 7(9): e43542.
Raabe E. 1986. Die Gliederung der Ufervegetation der Elbe unterhalb von Hamburg. Mitteilungen zum Natur- und Umweltschutz Hamburg 2: 117–141
Radtke A., E. Mosner, and I. Leyer. 2012. Vegetative reproduction capacities of floodplain willows—cutting response to competition and biomass loss. Plant Biology 14(2): 257–264.
Ramsar 2014. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. http://www.ramsar.org/.
Sand-Jensen K., and J. Borum. 1991. Interactions among phytoplankton, periphyton, and macrophytes in temperate freshwaters and estuaries. Aquatic Botany 41: 137–175.
Schmid B. 1992. Phenotypic variation in plants. Evolutionary Trends in Plants 6: 45–60.
Schreiber U., U. Schliwa, and W. Bilger. 1986. Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photosynthesis Research 10: 51–62.
STATISTICA for Windows. 2009. Version 9.0. Tulsa, USA. (StatSoft).
Struyf E., J. Sander, P. Meire, K. Jensen, and A. Barendregt. 2009. Plant communities of European tidal freshwater wetlands. In Tidal freshwater wetlands, eds. A. Barendregt, D.F. Whigham, and A.H. Baldwin, 1–10. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.
Temmerman S., G. Govers, S. Warte, and P. Meire. 2004. Modelling estuarine variations in tidal marsh sedimentation: response to changing sea level and suspended sediment concentrations. Marine Geology 212: 1–9.
Timoney K.P., and G. Argus. 2006. Willows, water regime, and recent cover change in the Peace–Athabasca Delta. Ecoscience 13(3): 308–317.
Weston N.B. 2014. Declining sediments and rising seas: an unfortunate convergence for tidal wetlands. Estuaries and Coasts 37: 1–23.
Winkel A., T.D. Colmer, and O. Pedersen. 2011. Leaf gas films of Spartina anglica enhance rhizome and root oxygen during tidal submergence. Plant, Cell and Environment 34: 2083–2092.
Zander, M. 2000. Untersuchungen zur Identifizierung ausgewählter Vertreter der Gattung Salix L. im NO-deutschen Tiefland, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Salix-repens-Komplexes. Mitteilungen zur floristischen Kartierung in Sachsen-Anhalt, Halle.
Acknowledgments
We thank Johannes Wallenfang, Lukas Pönitzsch, Julian Tudrzierz, Nicola Lenzewski, and Alexander Michalczyk for the assistance in data collection and Christoph Reisdorff for providing weather data for the common garden. We are grateful for the constructive comments of the journal editors and reviewers on previous drafts of this manuscript. This work was supported by the Estuary and Wetland Research Graduate School Hamburg (ESTRADE Hamburg).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Bob Christian
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Markus-Michalczyk, H., Hanelt, D. & Jensen, K. Effects of Tidal Flooding on Juvenile Willows. Estuaries and Coasts 39, 397–405 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-015-0014-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-015-0014-8