1 Introduction

Pollutions of soils and aquatic bodies are usually caused by industrials’ wastes. The physical and chemical treatments that exist nowadays are expensive and are not able to remove trace quantities of pollutant. There are a few successful remediation techniques that have been developed and used in petroleum-contaminated sites (Mohammed et al. 2007). Indigenous bioremediation plays an important part in diesel pollution because diesel produces damaging vapors and intolerable smell that have to remediate immediately (Mohammed et al. 2007; Claassens et al. 2006). Other advantages include easy to maintain, can be apply to large area, affordable, and completely degrade the contaminant (Bento et al. 2005).

In Malaysia, oil and grease are ranked as the highest industrial pollution (DOE 2007). Since Malaysia is one of the oil and gas producer in the world, oil pollution could not be avoided especially since Malaysia owns the Straits of Malacca—the busiest waterway in the world. Contamination occurs in Malaysia mostly caused by human error. For instance, when two oil tankers collided with each other in the coastal areas of the Straits of Malacca spilling, almost 150 tons of diesel making the case to be one of the largest hydrocarbon spills to be reported (Berita Harian Online 1997). Other reports include an overturned lorry tanker spilling almost 15 tons of diesel contaminating the soils in Seremban (The New Straits Times 2000) and spilling of one ton of diesel into the soils in Gelugor from a 1,000 kW-mobile generator unit (The New Straits Times 2001). A locally isolated bacterial consortium that can effectively degrade diesel has been reported (Ghazali et al. 2004). Even though there are a lot of reports on the isolation of diesel-degrading bacteria, the search for the best degrader is still going at full speed to isolate bacteria with better properties to improve diesel remediation.

In this work, we report on the isolation of a diesel-degrading bacterium that is shown to be able to optimally degrade diesel at a broad range of temperature from 10 to 40 °C. Based on the characteristics of this bacterium, it is practical to be used as a bioremediation agent in the tropics.

2 Experimental work

2.1 Isolation of diesel-degrading bacteria

10 g of soil sample was taken randomly from a depth of 15–20 cm from topsoil and stored in sterile screw-capped vials. The soil samples were taken in the year 2004 near Bukit Ekspo (Universiti Putra Malaysia). The soil samples were resuspended in 10 mL of sterile saline solution (0.9 % NaCl) and were vigorously shaken for 5 min. A basal salt medium consists of diesel as sole carbon source was used as the enrichment culture media. A modified basal salt medium composed of; KH2PO4, 1.360 g; Na2HPO4, 1.388 g; KNO3, 0.5 g; MgSO4, 0.01 g; CaCl2, 0.01 g; (NH4)2SO4, 7.7 g; and 100 mL of a mineral solution containing 0.01 g of ZnSO4·7H2O, MnCl2·4H2O, H3BO4, CoCl2·6H2O, Fe2SO4·2H2O, CuCl2·2H2O, and NaMoO4·2H2O (Michaud et al. 2004). The flasks were then incubated at 30 °C and were shaken at 150 rpm (YIH DER Taiwan) for 7 days. Isolation and enumeration were performed using the spread plate technique. The cultures were then incubated at 30 °C. Isolates showing a distinct colonial morphologies were isolated by repeated sub-culturing into basal salt medium and solidified basal salt medium to obtain purified strains. Identification was performed using Biolog GN MicroPlate (Biolog, Hayward, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and molecular phylogenetic studies.

2.2 Diesel analysis using gas chromatography

The fingerprint of the individual diesel residues and the intermediate products produced was quantified using Varian 2900 (Varian, USA) Gas Chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) fitted with a Chrompack Capillary Column, WCOT Fused Silica 30 m × 0.39 (film thickness 0.25 μm) (Varian). The column temperature parameters were set at an initial temperature of 50 °C for 5 min followed by a 10 °C increment per minute to 30 °C and the isothermal held for 10 min. Carrier gas velocity was 30 mL/min, and makeup gas velocity was 30 mL/min with a total run time of 35 min.

2.3 Solid-phase microextraction (SPME)

An SPME [Polydimethylsiloxane(PDMS), 7 μm thickness, Supelco, USA] was used as a hydrocarbon compounds extraction device. Since diesel fuel is volatile, it is well suited for sampling with SPME fibers (Eriksson et al. 1998). To analyze the aromatic hydrocarbons during the biodegradation process, 1.5 mL of homogenized culture was extracted from the incubated growth medium and filtered through 0.45 μm (Milipore) membrane and stored in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. For GC analysis, 100 μL of the diesel constituents was transferred into 1.5 mL glass vials and heated on a hot plate. Teflon septum was pierced through by a SPME fiber coated with a 7 μm polydimethylsiloxane layer (Supelco USA), and was pushed down into the middle of the static headspace using SPME holder Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, USA). The fiber was then retracted after extraction (headspace) at 110 °C for 10 min and immediately inserted manually into the injector for GC analysis.

2.4 16S rDNA gene sequencing

Alkaline lysis was performed to extract genomic DNA from bacterial colonies. PCR amplification was performed using a thermal cycler (Biometra, Gottingen, Germany). The PCR mixture with a final volume of 50 µL consists of 0.5 pM of each primer, 200 µM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 1X reaction buffer, 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega). The 16S rDNA gene from the genomic DNA was amplified using the following primers: 5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′ and 5′-AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA-3′ corresponding to the forward and reverse primers of 16S rDNA, respectively (Devereux and Wilkinson 2004). PCR was performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min; 25 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 50 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 2 min; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Cycle sequencing was subsequently performed with the Big Dye terminator kit (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems) as recommended by the manufacturer.

2.5 Sequence analysis

The BLAST 2 sequences algorithm using the BLASTN option with the matrix turned off and default parameters available from the server NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/) was used to analyze the pairwise comparisons to measure the level of homology between the two nucleotide sequences of the forward and the reverse complement of the reverse primer sequence. The two sequences were compared and checked for errors and omissions of bases especially at the overlapped region based on the overlapped region between the forward and reverse complement of the reverse primer sequence using the CHROMAS software Version 1.45. The sequences were combined at bases giving the least ambiguous characters and gaps. The comparison of the combined 16S RNA gene sequence, and the resultant 758 bases were compared with the GenBank database using the Blast server at NCBI (Altschul et al. 1990). This analysis showed that the sequence is closely related to rrs from Gammaproteobacteria. The partial 16S rRNA ribosomal gene sequences for this isolate have been deposited in GenBank under the following accession number DQ851856. The Blast server at NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) was used to compare the resultant 852 bases. This analysis showed that this sequence is similar to Burkholderia species with 99 % similarity. The results obtained from Biolog™ identification system showed that Isolate 27 was similar to Burkholderia cepacia with 75 % similarity. Together with the Biolog™ results, for now, isolate 27 is assigned tentatively as Burkholderia sp. strain DRY27 (Gusmanizar et al. 2008).

2.6 Determination of kinetic parameters for growth on diesel

Determination of intrinsic growth kinetic parameters can be modeled based on several substrate inhibition models available such as Haldane and Luong compared to the commonly used Monod model due to the known inhibitory effect of high concentration of diesel to growth (Mulchandani et al. 1989; Zhukov et al. 2007; Abdel Megeed and Mueller 2009). The formulas for the above model are shown in Table 1 where u, u max, K s, K i, S, S m, and n are specific growth rate (h−1), maximum growth rate (h−1), half-saturation constant (mg/L), inhibition constant (mg/L), substrate concentration (mg/L), critical substrate concentration above which growth completely stops (mg/L) and the exponent representing the impact of the substrate to u max, respectively. The values of the specific growth rate coefficient µ at each initial diesel concentration could be obtained by plotting In X (bacterial numbers) vs. time. When these values were plotted against substrate concentrations, a nonlinear curve will be obtained and modeling could be done to determine the constants. CurveExpert Professional software (Version 1.6) with custom equation algorithm was used to find the constants.

Table 1 Various kinetic models for effect of substrate on growth rate

2.7 MATH assay

A modified method of Rosenberg (1984) and Zoueki et al. (2010) was used for the MATH assay. The bacterial suspension was adjusted to an absorbance of 1.0 at 600 nm on a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu) with the addition of NaCl to a final concentration of about 0.2 M. About 300 µL of hexadecane was added to 5 mL of bacterial suspension in a clean borosilicate round-bottom glass tube (16 × 150 mm, Pyrex). The tube was vortexed for 2 min and then was set aside resting for 15 min to allow for the phases to separate. About 2 mL of the bacterial suspension was removed carefully using Pasteur pipet and transferred to a quartz cuvette for absorbance measurement at 600 nm. Bacterial adhesion to the hydrocarbons was evaluated using the formula FPC = 1−A f/A o where FPC is a fraction partitioned to the hydrocarbon phase, A f is final absorbance and A o is initial absorbance.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Temperature and pH effects on growth

Based on Fig. 1, strain DRY27 grew optimally in a wide range of temperatures ranging from 10 to 40 °C and the growth rate grew dramatically at higher temperatures. The optimum temperature for strain DRY27 growth was 30 °C. Temperature of 30 °C was reported to be the most optimum temperature for diesel degradation by other microorganisms (Cavalca et al. 2000; Mukherji et al. 2004; Hong et al. 2005; Lee et al. 2006; Kwapisz et al. 2008). In Ma and Herson (2000), growth of Burkholderia sp. was reported to be at 37 °C. Growth at a lower temperature optima in between 10 and 15 °C (Shukor et al. 2009b), 10 and 25 °C (Margesin 2000), at 20 °C (Chapman and Shelton 1995; Lee et al. 2005; Ueno et al. 2007), at 27 °C (Rajasekar et al. 2007) and in between 27 and 37 °C (Shukor et al. 2009a) has also been reported. Diesel degradation at a higher temperature by a bacterium has been described by Márquez-Rocha et al. (2005). Rhodococcus ruber and Rhodococcus erythropolis also have been shown to be able to degrade diesel at 37 °C (Bicca et al. 1999). Even though these bacteria were reported to grow well at 37 °C, they were not able to grow in a wide temperature range as shown by strain DRY27. This is an advantage since Malaysia has a tropical climate where soil temperature can vary from 24 to 35 °C year-round (Sinnakkannu et al. 2004).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The effect of temperature on the growth of strain DRY27. Growth was carried out at various temperatures for 5 days on an orbital shaker (150 rpm). Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 3

pH plays an important role in bacterial growth. pH in a media can be changed simply by the production and accumulation of bacterial waste products (Shukor et al. 2009b). This is why it is very important to optimize the environmental conditions for the enhancement of bacterial growth. To design an effective bioremediation strategy, identification of the pH optima is important (Davey 1994). The optimal pH that supported growth of the bacterium was between pH 7.5 and 8.5 in borate, and Tris–HCl buffer (Fig. 2). There are a lot of other bacterial strains that need the neutral or near neutrality for the optimal growth of bacteria on diesel (Espeche et al. 1994; Chapman and Shelton 1995; Bicca et al. 1999; Margesin 2000; Cavalca et al. 2000; Mukherji et al. 2004; Hong et al. 2005; Márquez-Rocha et al. 2005; Lee et al. 2005, 2006; Rajasekar et al. 2007; Ueno et al. 2007; Kwapisz et al. 2008). However, Burkholderia sp. has been reported to grow at pH 4.9 (Somtrakoon et al. 2008).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The effect of pH on the growth of strain DRY27 using three overlapping buffers. The buffer systems used were phosphate (open circles), carbonate (filled circles) and tris (diamonds). Growth was carried out at room temperature for 5 days on an orbital shaker (150 rpm). Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 3

3.2 The effect of carbon source

This experiment was performed to study the optimum diesel concentration as a carbon source for strain DRY27. Based on Fig. 3, the optimum carbon source (diesel) concentration for the growth of strain DRY27 was 3 % (v/v). We also showed that strain DRY27 was able to grow on 2 % (v/v), 4 % (v/v) and 5 % (v/v) of diesel with a declining bacterial growth (Fig. 4). Even though diesel is needed as a carbon source, at a high concentration, it can be considered as toxic to microorganisms due to the effect of solvent in diesel that damages bacterial cell membrane (Shukor et al. 2009b). This is why a lot of biodegradation studies on diesel are carried out using lesser diesel concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 % (Mukherji et al. 2004; Lee et al. 2005, 2006; Hong et al. 2005; Rajasekar et al. 2007; Ueno et al. 2007). Concentration higher than 1 or 1.5 % has been proven to cause retardedness in degradation (Espeche et al. 1994; Bicca et al. 1999; Lee et al. 2005, 2006). Degradation of diesel at a much higher concentration (6 % v/v) is possible but it requires glucose (0.2 % w/v) and yeast extract (0.1 % w/v) (Kwapisz et al. 2008). DRY27 displays high cell surface hydrophobicity when cultured on aliphatic hydrocarbons or diesel as the sole carbon source (Mohanti and Mukherji 2007). Burkholderia sp. can also degrade a wide variety of alkanes, toluene, benzoate, m-, p- and O-toluate as sole carbon (Ma and Herson 2000).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The effect of diesel concentrations on the growth of strain DRY27 grown at room temperature, pH 7.5 for 5 days on an orbital shaker (150 rpm). Bacterial growth was measured by determination of colony-forming unit (log CFU/mL). Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 3

Fig. 4
figure 4

Growth profile of strain DRY27 at various concentrations of diesel grown at room temperature, pH 7.5 for on an orbital shaker (150 rpm). Bacterial growth was measured by determination of colony-forming unit (log CFU/mL). Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 3

3.3 Effect of nitrogen sources

Growth of strain DRY27 on various inorganic nitrogen sources including ammonium sulphate, ammonium chloride, sodium nitrate, sodium nitrite, acrylamide, iodoacetamide, nicotinamide, methacrylamide and propionamide was tested. Sodium nitrate gave the highest growth rate on diesel compared to the other carbon sources (p < 0.05) followed by ammonium sulfate and ammonium chloride (p < 0.05). The other inorganic nitrogen sources tested showed a significant reduction in growth rate compared to sodium nitrate, ammonium sulfate and ammonium chloride (Fig. 5). It was reported that the best nitrogen source in diesel biodegradation works is mostly either ammonium or nitrate salts (Espeche et al. 1994; Chapman and Shelton 1995; Bicca et al. 1999; Margesin 2000; Cavalca et al. 2000; Mukherji et al. 2004; Hong et al. 2005; Márquez-Rocha et al. 2005; Lee et al. 2005, 2006; Rajasekar et al. 2007; Ueno et al. 2007; Kwapisz et al. 2008). The use of nitrite in bioremediation has to be handled carefully since it is known to inhibit cellular growth during hydrocarbon biodegradation (Chayabutra and Ju 2000). The study of nitrogen sources is important as the decrease of nitrogen in the microbial environment will limit the rate of hydrocarbon degradation (Atlas and Cerniglia 1995).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The effect of different nitrogen sources on the growth of strain DRY27. Growth was carried out at room temperature, pH 7.5, using 2 % (v/v) diesel for 5 days on an orbital shaker (150 rpm). Bacterial growth was measured by colony-forming unit (log CFU/mL). Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 3

3.4 Growth kinetic studies

Data from experimental value were fitted to three kinetic models of growth i.e., Monod, Luong and Haldane using CurveExpert Professional software (Version 1.6) custom equation algorithm that minimizes sums of square of residuals (Haldane 1930; Monod 1949). The correlation coefficient value for the substrate inhibition model of Haldane was 0.999 indicating good fitting, while the Luong model gave a slightly lower value of 0.997. The Monod model gave the lowest correlation coefficient value of 0.91 indicating poor fitting (Fig. 6). The value of specific growth rate μ tends to increase as the substrate concentration is increased and rises to a peak value and finally decreases. According to the best model, Haldane, the maximum growth rate(µ max) was 0.305 h−1, while the saturation constant or half-velocity constant K s and inhibition constant K i, were 1.171 % (v/v) or 9.95 g/L and 3.215 % (v/v) or 27.32 mg/L diesel, respectively. There are few data on diesel degradation and utilization kinetics in the literature. The µ max value is higher than values reported for alkane-degrading P. frederiksbergensis and R. erythropolis at 0.0154 and 0.0125 (h−1), respectively (Abdel Megeed and Mueller 2009), and lower than Rhodococcus rubber and Rhodococcus erythropolis grown on diesel in another study that showed maximum growth rates of 0.086 and 0.123 h−1, respectively (Zhukov et al. 2007). A lower value of K s indicates a high affinity of biomass and degradative enzymes to substrate, while a high K i value indicates good tolerance towards high diesel concentrations.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Growth kinetics of strain DRY27 on diesel. Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 3

3.5 MATH assay

After extraction with hexadecane, 65 % of the bacterium was found in the hexadecane phase indicating that the bacterium was hydrophobic. This value is close to MATH values of between 70 and 80 % found in several hydrocarbon-degrading strains (Zoueki et al. 2010; Mara et al. 2012). The vortexing part produces fine hydrocarbon droplets that the bacteria can adhere to. The inclusion of high salt concentration prevents attraction due to charge surfaces and adhesion is only due to hydrophobic interaction—the more hydrophobic the bacterial surface the more likely for binding and biodegradation.

After achieving all of the optimization results on strain DRY27, biodegradation of diesel was performed. The reduction in hydrocarbon peaks was shown to be 96.5 % after 7 days of incubation (Fig. 7). In Mohanti and Mukherji, B. cepacia is able to degrade only 51.37 % of diesel for 15 days which is a longer time compared to DRY27 (Mohanti and Mukherji 2007).

Fig. 7
figure 7

GC profiles of diesel oil extracted from the aqueous phase of the medium after 7 days of incubation with 3 % diesel (v/v) with and without inoculation with strain DRY27. a Abiotic control (uninoculated); b inoculated with diesel. The internal standard was n-hexane

4 Conclusions

This work served as an introductory study for the actual bioremediation works on the polluted site using the autochthonous strain DRY27. Crude and processed hydrocarbons are known to contain significant amount of heavy metals that could inhibit bioremediation of the diesel polluted site. This is why study of resistant of strain DRY27 to heavy metal is performed. Work is also underway to characterize the enzymes and genes involved in diesel degradation. We are also working on bioaugmentation studies using this strain to remediate hydrocarbon sludge from a petroleum-processing plant as part of a bioremediation study using allochthonous bacterium.