Abstract
Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is one of the most common viruses, infecting more than 90% of the adult population worldwide. EBV genome is detected in some lymphoid neoplasms. Not only their histopathological subtypes, but also their backgrounds and their clinical courses are variable. A number of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders associated with the immunocompromised state are related to EBV infection. The incidences of these disorders have been increasing along with generalization of organ transplantations and use of immunosuppressive treatments. Furthermore, some EBV-positive lymphoma can also occur in immunocompetent patients. While evaluating patients with generalized lymphadenopathy of unknown cause by positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG-PET/CT), the possibility of lymphoid neoplasms should be considered in some patients, and a careful review of the background and previous history of the patients is necessary. In this review article, we describe the pathogenesis of EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms and then present FDG-PET/CT images of representative diseases. In addition, we also present a review of other EBV-related diseases, such as infectious mononucleosis and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is one of the most commonly occurring viruses, infecting more than 90% of the adult population worldwide through contact with oral secretions [1, 2]. When reflecting on the historical background of EBV, we need to start with the description by Burkitt in 1958 of a common cancer affecting children in equatorial Africa, which subsequently came to be known as Burkitt lymphoma (BL) [3]. In 1964, Epstein and Barr identified herpes virus-like particles by electron microscopy in a cell line established from a BL biopsy specimen [4]. These findings represent the first discovery of an oncovirus. In 1970, Zur Hausen et al. demonstrated that EBV infection was a common feature in patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) [5]. Subsequent studies have shown EBV infection to be associated with a variety of other human tumors, including some lymphoid neoplasms.
Although EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms can occur in immunocompetent patients, the incidence of EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms associated with immunocompromised state has been increasing along with generalization of organ transplantations and use of immunosuppressive treatments. With the increasing frequency of use of positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG-PET/CT), nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists are increasingly faced with the opportunity of evaluating FDG-PET/CT images of patients with generalized lymphadenopathy of unknown cause. While interpreting the FDG-PET/CT images of such cases, the possibility of EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms needs to be considered in some patients. For rapid and appropriate diagnosis, not only careful evaluation of the PET/CT images, but also a review of the background and previous history of the patients is necessary.
First, in this review article, we describe the pathogenesis of EBV infection. Thereafter, we illustrate the FDG-PET/CT findings of representative EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients, with some explanations of their epidemiology and pathology. Finally, we review other EBV-related diseases which can serve as pitfalls in the diagnosis of lymphomas.
Pathogenesis of EBV infection
Epstein–Barr virus is a double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) virus of the herpes virus family [1, 6]. We have illustrated the pathogenesis of EBV infection in Fig. 1. Transmitted EBV via the saliva firstly infects resting B cells or epithelial cells localized in the oropharynx. The infected cells produce EBV which spread in the whole body. Then, the virus infects systemic B cells and causes the proliferation and activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer (NK) cells. The reaction is sometimes accompanied by severe systemic inflammation; lymphadenopathy, fever, and liver dysfunction, named infectious mononucleosis (IM). Although the primary infected cells are eradicated by these reactive CTLs, EBV persistently infects memory B cells throughout life without replication of the virus (latent infection).
To evade the attack of host’s CTLs, the EBV gene expression in the resting memory B cell is limited to nine viral latent proteins [2]. These are six EBV nuclear antigens (EBNAs-1, -2, -3a, -3b, -3c, and -LP) and three latent membrane proteins (LMP-1, -2a, and -2b) [2]. Furthermore, the non-translated types of EBV-encoded ribonucleic acid (EBER) may be important for oncogenesis and resistance to programmed cell death or apoptosis [6].
According to the pattern of expression of the latent EBV genes, there are three distinct patterns of latency programs [2, 7]. Type 1 is selective expression of EBNA-1 which induces BL. Type 2 shows the expression of LMP-1 and LMP-2 in addition to EBNA-1. This pattern contributes to pathogenesis of some types of lymphoma, such as Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL). Type 3, which is characterized by the expression of all EBNA and LMP families, is related to lymphomagenesis in immunocompromised patients, such as post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related diseases.
EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms in immunocompetent patients
The WHO classification of representative EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms in immunocompetent patients is shown in Table 1 [2, 8]. Most EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms are highly FDG-avid. In the following sections, we will explain some types of EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms, with representative FDG-PET/CT images of some cases.
Burkitt lymphoma (endemic and sporadic)
BL is considered as a prime example for c-myc-induced lymphomagenesis [9] and EBV may increase the likelihood of genetic accidents giving rise to the translocation, or may complement the activity of c-Myc [2]. The EBV positivity rate differs between endemic BL (100%) and sporadic BL (20–30%) [2]. Because of the fast growth of the tumor, with a potential doubling time of 24 h, BL can rapidly result in serious clinical conditions, such as airway compromise, cavernous sinus invasion, and spinal cord compression [1]. Chemotherapy with or without rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is highly effective, regardless of the EBV positivity status [2].
Because all BL lesions are highly FDG-avid [10, 11], FDG-PET/CT is useful for initial staging [12] and for monitoring the response to therapy [13] (Fig. 2).
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma
The EBV positivity rate is 40% [2]. The hallmark of HL, Reed–Strenberg (R–S) cell, needs NF-κB function for its survival. In EBV-infected cases, LMP1 activates NF-κB by mimicking an activated CD40 receptor [14]. A recent study showed that plasma EBV DNA is a useful biomarker for predicting the outcome in patients with advanced HL [15]. Especially in the early stage HL patients, EBV infection affects the shorter survival [16]. Although chemotherapy for both EBV-positive and EBV-negative cases of HL is currently identical and results in long-term remissions in most patients [2], concurrent radiotherapy is recommended for early stage HL [17].
Regardless of the positivity for EBV, HL lesions are also highly FDG-avid as BLs [10] (Fig. 3). FDG-PET/CT is useful not only for the initial staging, but also for monitoring of the early response to therapy and predicting the prognosis [18,19,20]. Recently, however, El-Galaly et al. [21] have reported a high negative predictive value (99%) of FDG-PET/CT for detecting bone-marrow involvement. Furthermore, in their study, the findings of bone-marrow biopsy did not change therapeutic strategy. Considering those results, international working group recently suggested that bone-marrow biopsy is no longer indicated if FDG-PET/CT is performed in cases of HL [22].
Pyothorax-associated lymphoma (PAL)
PAL is one of the representative types of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) associated with chronic inflammation described in the WHO classification [8]. The EBV-positive rate in DLBCL is estimated as at most about 70% [2]. Pleural lymphoma develops in 2.2% of patients with chronic pyothorax. Most patients have a more than 20-year history of chronic pyothorax or having received an artificial pneumothorax for the treatment of lung tuberculosis, and tuberculous pleuritis is a risk factor for the development of lymphoma even in immunocompetent patients [1, 23] (Fig. 4).
FDG-PET/CT is useful for management of PAL, including for radiotherapy planning, and also for the detection of residual disease after treatment [24, 25].
EBV-positive DLBCL, not otherwise specified
Although the 2008 WHO classification included a provisional entity “EBV-positive DLBCL of the elderly”, this was replaced by “EBV-positive DLBCL, not otherwise specified (NOS)” in the 2016 revision, because it may occur in younger patients [8]. It is characterized by EBV-positive monoclonal large B-cell proliferation, and usually occurs in patients older than 50 years of age with no known immunodeficiency or history of lymphoma [26]. Although therapeutic approach for DLBCL, namely, administration of a combination of rituximab and anthracycline-based chemotherapy, does not differ according to the EBV positivity status, EBV-positive DLBCL is associated with a worse prognosis as compared to EBV-negative DLBCL [27]. In addition, expression of CD30 has been shown to be associated with an adverse outcome [28].
Although there have been few case reports, most lesions are highly FDG-avid [10] (Fig. 5) and FDG-PET/CT is useful for clinical management of these patients, just as in patients with other DLBCLs. There have not been studies which compared FDG-PET/CT findings between EBV-positive and EBV-negative DLBCL. However, nodal and extranodal necrosis, which is reported as more frequent in patients with EBV-positive DLBCL, may contribute to the differential diagnosis [29].
Lymphomatoid granulomatosis (LYG)
Lymphomatoid granulomatosis is a rare type of EBV-related lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) characterized by atypical lymphoid cell infiltration of an organ, most frequently the lungs [30, 31]. High-grade LYG is known to be associated with inferior outcomes and needs aggressive therapy according to the treatment protocol for high-grade B-cell lymphomas [30]. Siegloch et al. recommended high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplantation (SCT) for LYG cases with refractory diseases or multiple relapses [32].
Although there are few reports discussing the FDG-PET/CT findings of LYG, Chung et al. reported two cases with bilateral pulmonary nodules which showed elevated FDG uptake [31]. We have illustrated a case of DLBCL associated with LYG in Fig. 6, although the FDG uptake in the lung nodule was not so high in this case.
Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type
ENKTL most often occurs in immunocompetent middle-aged men of Asian, Native American, or Central/South American descent, and the neoplastic cells are positive for EBV [2]. Because radiotherapy concurrent with or followed by chemotherapy has become the standard of treatment for limited-stage diseases [33], accurate staging is mandatory. For advanced-stage and relapsed or refractory disease, l-asparaginase, which exerts its anti-tumor effect by asparagine starvation of the tumor cells which show low expression levels of asparagine synthetase, has been reported to be effective [2, 33].
Most lesions of ENKTL are highly FDG-avid [10, 34, 35] (Fig. 7). Existence of a correlation has been reported between the FDG uptake and extent of local invasion, and thereby the survival outcomes [36, 37].
EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms in immunocompromised patients
The WHO classification of representative EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms in immunocompromised patients is shown in Table 2 [2, 8]. For appropriate diagnosis of these disorders, a careful review of the background and previous history of the patients is essential. We will discuss three types of EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms below.
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs)
PTLDs develop as a result of EBV-induced transformation of B cells in the setting of impaired anti-EBV cellular immunity induced by iatrogenic immunosuppression after transplant therapy [2]. Not only B-cell type, but also T-cell-type PTLDs can develop after transplantation, and their EBV positivity was 70 and 90%, respectively [2]. T-cell-type PTLDs are quite rarer. The risk of PTLDs is increased when an EBV-negative recipient receives a transplant from an EBV-positive donor [38]. The overall prevalence following solid organ transplantation ranges from 1 to 20%, with the highest rates in recipients of intestines and lungs [39]. EBV-positive PTLDs typically occur in the first year after transplantation [39]. The most effective intervention known until date for PTLDs is reduction of immunosuppression, while relapse is not rare [38, 39].
Most PTLDs lesions are FDG-avid (Fig. 8). Panagiotidis et al. reported a sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/CT of 88.2 and 91.3%, respectively, for the diagnosis of PTLDs [40]. As compared to the conventional imaging methods, FDG-PET/CT may be more useful to detect occult lesions, particularly extranodal lesions [41].
Lymphoma associated with HIV infection
Loss of immune surveillance of EBV-driven B-cell transformation leads to the development of lymphomas because of the decrease of CTLs [1]. Many subtypes of lymphoma associated with HIV infection have been described. In particular, primary effusion lymphoma and plasmablastic lymphoma of the oral cavity are known as lymphomas occurring more specifically in HIV-positive patients [42]. EBV positivity differs depending on the histology of the tumor. Although the overall positivity rate of EBV in HIV-related lymphomas is about 60% [1], primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and plasmablastic lymphoma show a positive detection rate of 100% [2].
Although there have been few studies conducted to evaluate the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT, this imaging modality is considered to be useful for staging, restaging, and surveillance for HIV-related lymphoma of various histologic subtypes [43].
Other iatrogenic immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs), previously known as methotrexate (MTX)-related LPDs
Methotrexate is one of the most commonly used drugs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Inhibition of T-cell activation and suppression of T-cell expression of the intercellular adhesion molecule by MTX are the main causes of MTX-related LPDs [44]. Recently, the disorders also arise in patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) antagonists. Spontaneous regression is seen after the withdrawal of MTX, especially in EBV-positive cases (about 40–50%) [2, 42] (Fig. 9), whereas regression after drug discontinuation seldom occurs in patients who developed the disorders following anti-TNFα antagonists.
FDG-PET/CT allows clinical assessment of MTX-related LPDs and their recurrent lesions [45, 46]. However, degree of FDG uptake in the lesion before the withdrawal of MTX is not useful to predict complete response after the withdrawal of MTX [46].
Pitfalls
Infectious mononucleosis (IM) and NPC are representative pitfalls, as they can be misdiagnosed as EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms. Because the seroprevalence of EBV antibody has recently declined in young individuals [47], more patients with IM may be referred for FDG-PET/CT in clinical practice. It is difficult to distinguish between NPC and lymphoma based on the FDG-PET/CT findings alone. Nevertheless, we should suggest the accurate extent of the disease from the findings on FDG-PET/CT, even if the histopathological diagnosis is yet to be established.
On the other hand, we would like to discuss the FDG-PET/CT findings of chronic active EBV infection (CAEBV). To the best of our knowledge, there are no previous reports which showed characteristic FDG-PET/CT findings of CAEBV.
Infectious mononucleosis (IM)
During primary infection of EBV, NK cells and CTLs control proliferating EBV-infected B cells. It is considered that these cell-mediated immune responses result in the classical trial of IM symptoms, namely, pharyngitis, fever, and lymphadenopathy [48].
Some cases of IM with FDG-PET/CT findings similar to those of lymphomas have been reported [49,50,51] (Fig. 10). However, it is not difficult to distinguish IM from LPDs or lymphomas considering the clinical course, which clearly suggests an acute inflammatory disease.
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)
Epstein–Barr virus released from lytic B cell is considered to be the viral source in EBV-related epithelial neoplasms, such as NPC [1]. It is impossible to distinguish between NPC and lymphoma based on the findings of FDG-PET/CT alone. However, we should be able to assess the accurate extent of the lesions, not only of the primary lesion, but also of the nodal spread, from the FDG-PET/CT findings, even if the histopathological diagnosis is not yet to be established. FDG-PET/CT is also useful for the evaluation of local recurrence or distant metastases [52, 53]. On the other hand, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior for the detection of intracranial extension [54].
We have shown a case in which NPC and gastric carcinoma incidentally coexisted in Fig. 11.
Chronic active EBV infection (CAEBV)
CAEBV is a rare disease characterized by inflammation, including fever, splenohepatomegaly, and lymphadenopathy, and so on, persisting for at least 6 months. In WHO classification revise in 2016, CAEBV was defined to have two characteristic skin disorders: hydroa vacciniforme-like LPD and severe mosquito bite allergy [8]. CAEBV is considered to be an EBV infection of the T or NK cells resulting in their activation and immortalization. Such EBV-infected T or NK cells finally become expanded monoclones, leading to the development of aggressive diseases, such as lymphoma or hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis [55]. Although CAEBV mainly affects children, adult-onset cases are also encountered [1, 55]. Recently, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been reported as an effective treatment for this condition [56].
As described above, most EBV-related LPDs or lymphomas show elevated FDG uptake, just like other malignant tumors. However, according to our review, one of the characteristic findings in CAEBV is that despite physical examination revealing the presence of lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly, these involved organs do not show elevated FDG uptake. Suspecting the possibility of CAEBV from the findings of FDG-PET/CT carried out for the investigation of related symptoms, including fever of unknown origin, may contribute to rapid diagnosis and prompt therapy.
We have shown a representative case of CAEBV in Fig. 12. However, further studies including many cases of CAEBV are needed to confirm our hypothesis.
Conclusions
Because most EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms are highly FDG-avid, FDG-PET/CT is a useful tool for evaluating the extent of involvement, as a surveillance tool for recurrent lesions, and for monitoring of the response to therapy. Although there are not specific FDG-PET/CT findings to EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms when encountering patients with generalized lymphadenopathy with elevated FDG uptake, we should take possibility of EBV-related lymphoid neoplasms into consideration in conjunction with a careful review of the background and previous history of those patients.
References
Maeda E, Akahane M, Kiryu S, Kato N, Yoshikawa T, Hayashi N, et al. Spectrum of Epstein–Barr virus-related diseases: a pictorial review. Jpn J Radiol. 2009;27:4–19.
Roschewski M, Wilson WH. EBV-associated lymphomas in adults. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2012;25:75–89.
Burkitt D. A sarcoma involving the jaws in African children. Br J Surg. 1958;46:218–23.
Epstein MA, Anchong BG, Barr YM. Virus particles in cultured lymphoblasts from Burkitt’s lymphoma. Lancet. 1964;1:702–3.
Zur Hausen H, Schulte-Holthausen H, Klein G, Henle W, Henle G, Clifford P, et al. EBV DNA in biopsies of Burkitt tumours and anaplastic carcinomas of the nasopharynx. Nature. 1970;228:1056–8.
Cohen JI. Epstein–Barr virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:481–92.
Young LS, Murray PG. Epstein–Barr virus and oncogenesis: from latent genes to tomours. Oncogene. 2003;22:5108–21.
Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Pileri SA, Harris NL, Stein H, Siebert R, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood. 2016;127:2375–90.
Klapproth K, Wirth T. Advances in the understanding of MYC-induced lymphomagenesis. Br J Haematol. 2010;149:484–97.
Weiler-Sagie M, Bushelev O, Epelbaum R, Dann EJ, Haim N, Avivi I, et al. (18)F-FDG avidity in lymphoma readdressed: a study of 766 patients. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:25–30.
Zeng W, Lechowicz MJ, Winton E, Cho SM, Galt JR, Halkar R. Spectrum of FDG PET/CT findings in Burkitt lymphoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2009;34:355–8.
Karantanis D, Durski JM, Lowe VJ, Nathan MA, Mullan BP, Georgiou E, et al. 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in Burkitt’s lymphoma. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75:e68–73.
Carrillo-Cruz E, Marin-Oyaga VA, Rodriguez MS, Borrego-Dorado I, Vicente CF, Cantero EQ, et al. Role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the management of Burkitt lymphoma. Eur J Haematol. 2015;94:23–30.
Kuppers R. New insights in the biology of Hodgkin lymphoma. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012;2012:328–34.
Kanakry JA, Li H, Gellert LL, Lemas MV, Hsieh WS, Hong F, et al. Plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA predicts outcome in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma: correlative analysis from a large North American cooperative group trial. Blood. 2013;121:3547–53.
Myriam BD, Sonia Z, Hanene S, Teheni L, Mounir T. Prognostic significance of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection in Hodgkin lymphoma patients. J Infect Chemother. 2017;23:121–30.
Follows GA, Ardeshna KM, Barrington SF, Culligan DJ, Hoskin PJ, Linch D, et al. Guidelines for the first line management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2014;166:34–49.
Jerusalem G, Beguin Y, Fassotte MF, Najjar F, Paulus P, Rigo P, et al. Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation in Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical computed tomography scan imaging. Blood. 1999;94:429–33.
Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, Pedersen LM, Buhl T, Jurlander J, et al. FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2006;107:52–9.
Gallamini A, Hutchings M, Rigacci L, Specht L, Merli F, Hansen M, et al. Early interim 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography is prognostically superior to international prognostic score in advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a report from a joint Italian-Danish study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3746–52.
El-Galaly TC, d’Amore F, Mylam KJ, Brown PN, Bogsted M, Bukh A, et al. Routine bone marrow biopsy has little or no therapeutic consequence for positron emission tomography/computed tomography-staged treatment-naïve patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4508–14.
Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3059–67.
Aozasa K. Pyothorax-associated lymphoma. J Clin Exp Hematopathol. 2006;46:5–10.
Asakura H, Togami T, Mitani M, Takashima H, Yokoe K, Yamamoto Y, et al. Usefulness of FDG-PET imaging for the radiotherapy treatment planning of pyothorax-associated lymphoma. Ann Nucl Med. 2005;19:725–8.
Ito K, Shida Y, Kubota K, Morooka M, Aruga T, Itami J, et al. The management of pyothorax-associated lymphoma using 18F-FDG PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24:649–54.
Ok CY, Papathomas TG, Medeiros LJ, Medeiros LJ, Young KH. EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly. Blood. 2013;122:328–40.
Castillo JJ, Beltran BE, Miranda RN, Young KH, Chavez JC, Sotomayor EM. EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly: 2016 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2016;91:530–7.
Ok CY, Li L, Xu-Monette ZY, Visco C, Tzankov A, Manyam GC, et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of Epstein–Barr virus infection in de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Western countries. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;2:2338–49.
Tokuyama K, Okada F, Sato H, Matsumoto S, Matsumoto A, Haruno A, et al. Computed tomography findings in Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the elderly: comparison with EBV-negative DLBCL. Br J Radiol. 2017;90:20160879. doi:10.1259/bjr.20160879.
Roschewski M, Wilson WH. Lymphomatoid granulomatosis. Cancer J. 2012;18:469–74.
Chung JH, Wu CC, Gilman MD, Palmer EL, Hasserjian RP, Shepard JA. Lymphomatoid granulomatosis: CT and FDG-PET findings. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12:671–8.
Siegloch K, Schmitz N, Wu HS, Friedrichs B, van Imhoff GW, Montoto S, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphomatoid granulomatosis: a European group for blood and marrow transplantation report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19:1522–5.
Suzuki R. Pathogenesis and treatment of extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Semin Hematol. 2014;51:42–51.
Khong PL, Pang CB, Liang R, Kwong YL, Au WY. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in mature T-cell and natural killer cell malignancies. Ann Hematol. 2008;87:613–21.
Feeney J, Horwitz S, Gonen M, Schoder H. Characterization of T-cell lymphomas by FDG-PET/CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:333–40.
Suh C, Kang YK, Roh JL, Kim MR, Kim JS, Huh J, et al. Prognostic value of tumor 18F-FDG uptake in patients with untreated extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphomas of the head and neck. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1783–9.
Kim CY, Hong CM, Kim DH, Son SH, Jeong SY, Lee SW, et al. Prognostic value of whole-body metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis measured on 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:1321–9.
Jagadeesh D, Woda BA, Draper J, Evens AM. Post transplant lymphoproliferative disorders: risk, classification, and therapeutic recommendations. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2012;13:122–36.
Green M, Michaels MG. Epstein–Barr virus infection and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:41–54.
Panagiotidis E, Quigley AM, Pencharz D, Ardeshna K, Syed R, Sajjan R, et al. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diagnosis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:515–9.
Takehana CS, Twist CJ, Mosci C, Quon A, Mittra E, Iagaru A. 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Nucl Med Commun. 2014;35:276–81.
Tran H, Nourse J, Hall S, Green M, Griffiths L, Gandhi MK. Immunodeficiency-associated lymphomas. Blood Rev. 2008;22:261–81.
Davison JM, Subramaniam RM, Surasi DS, Cooley T, Mercier G, Peller PJ. FDG PET/CT in patients with HIV. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:284–94.
Johnston A, Gudionsson JE, Sigmundsdottir H, Ludviksson BR, Valdimarsson H. The anti-inflammatory action of methotrexate is not mediated by lymphocyte apoptosis, but by the suppression of activation and adhesion molecules. Clin Immunol. 2005;114:154–63.
Minamimoto R, Ito K, Kubota K, Morooka M, Masuda-Miyata Y, Hirai R, et al. Clinical role of FDG PET/CT for methotrexate-related malignant lymphoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:533–7.
Watanabe S, Manabe O, Hirata K, Oyama-Manabe N, Hattori N, Kikuchi Y, et al. The usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing methotrexate-associated lymphoproliferative disorder (MTX-LPD). BMC Cancer. 2016;16:635. doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2672-8.
Balfour HH Jr, Sifakis F, Sliman JA, Knight JA, Schmeling DO, Thomas W. Age-specific prevalence of Epstein–Barr virus infection among individuals aged 6–19 years in the United States and factors affecting its acquisition. J Infect Dis. 2013;208:1286–93.
Luzuriaga K, Sullivan JL. Infectious mononucleosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1993–2000.
Lustberg MB, Aras O, Meisenberg BR. FDG PET/CT findings in acute adult mononucleosis mimicking malignant lymphoma. Eur J Haematol. 2008;81:154–6.
Thomas DL, Syrbu S, Graham MM. Epstein–Barr virus mimicking lymphoma on FDG-PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2009;34:891–3.
Tomas MB, Tronco GG, Karayalcin G, Palestro CJ. FDG uptake in infectious mononucleosis. Clin Positron Imaging. 2000;3:176.
Liu T, Xu W, Yan WL, Ye M, Bai YR, Huang G. FDG-PET/CT, CT, MRI for diagnosis of local residual or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma, which one is the best? A systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2007;85:327–35.
Chang MC, Chen JH, Liang JA, Yang KT, Cheng KY, Kao CH. Accuracy of whole-body FDG-PET and FDG-PET/CT in M staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:366–73.
Lim TC, Chua ML, Chia GS, Ng DC, Ong SC, Wee JT, et al. Comparison of MRI, CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of intracranial disease extension in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck Oncol. 2012;4:49.
Arai A, Imadome K, Watanabe Y, Yoshimori M, Koyama T, Kawaguchi T, et al. Clinical features of adult-onset chronic active Epstein–Barr virus infection; a retrospective analysis. Int J Hematol. 2011;93:602–9.
Kawa K, Sawada A, Sato M, Okamura T, Sakata N, Kondo O, et al. Excellent outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT with reduced-intensity conditioning for the treatment of chronic active EBV infection. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011;46:77–83.
Acknowledgements
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors also have no grant funding or any financial relationships to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toriihara, A., Nakajima, R., Arai, A. et al. Pathogenesis and FDG-PET/CT findings of Epstein–Barr virus-related lymphoid neoplasms. Ann Nucl Med 31, 425–436 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-017-1180-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-017-1180-5