Abstract
Research documents that African American adolescents and young adults engage in more sexual activity than other racial/ethnic groups, yet little is known about individuals who remain virgins into adulthood. Using data from the Family and Community Health Study of 554 African American young adults, we examined the individual, familial, interpersonal, and community-level correlates and predictors associated with their virginity status. A total of 82 (14.8%) reported never having had sex. Hence, sexual activity among African American young adulthood is not a universal experience. Multivariable analysis showed that, for males, virginity was associated with BMI, physical attractiveness, educational attainment, anxiety, self-esteem, religious salience, residing in a two-parent household, and neighborhood social disorder. Lower odds of virginity were associated with being in a relationship, higher cognitive performance, and more antisocial friends. Among females, higher odds of virginity were associated with educational attainment and parental quality while lower odds were associated with higher cognitive performance and cigarette use. Results demonstrate that some characteristics associated with virginity were not necessarily the converse of previously identified factors linked to sexual activity. It is important to consider multiple correlates of virginity and their implications for sexuality development of African Americans across the life course.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sexual activity during adolescence and young adulthood has been a significant public health issue due to associations with unintended pregnancies, STIs, and cervical cancer (D’Souza et al. 2007; Eaton et al. 2011). However, engagement in sexual activity during adolescence and prior to marriage is common for a majority of Americans and is considered a normative behavior (Centers for Disease Control 2016; Reese et al. 2014; Tolman and McClelland 2011). Recent national estimates from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health found that a large majority of males (92.2%) and females (91.9%) have had vaginal sex by young adulthood (Halpern and Haydon 2012). Similarly, Mosher et al. (2005)’s study of U.S. adults found that approximately 86% of men and 87% of women reported having had vaginal intercourse with the opposite-sex. Previous studies have also documented racial/ethnic differences in sexual activity. For example, African Americans report higher rates of sexual activity (e.g., had intercourse, first intercourse before age 13, multiple sexual partners) compared to other racial/ethnic groups (Dariotis et al. 2011; Eaton et al. 2011; Landor and Halpern 2015; Pflieger et al. 2013) and are disproportionately impacted by deleterious consequences of sex. Despite these statistics indicating that sexual activity is quite common, particularly among African Americans, we know little about virginity in the lives of African Americans. As stated by Halpern et al. (2006), “persons who defy the odds and delay sexual debut beyond adolescence represent an interesting minority group” (p. 926.e2). Most past research on the sexuality of African Americans has focused exclusively on issues related to first sexual experience or being sexually active (Bazargan et al. 2000; Boislard et al. 2016; Carpenter 2005). What about the other side of this coin? What are the characteristics of African Americans who remain virgins into young adulthood?
National estimates and empirical research on the virginity status of U.S. populations found that a small proportion of individuals remain virgins, as defined by individuals who have never engaged in vaginal-penile intercourse, even into young adulthood. Estimates from the National Survey of Family Growth indicated that 13.9% of men and 8.9% of women had not had vaginal intercourse, representing nearly 2 million individuals (Eisenberg et al. 2009). Another study found similar results. Approximately 11% of U.S. adults reported not having had sexual contact with the opposite-sex (Chandra et al. 2013). Among these studies, the prevalence of virginity among all African Americans, regardless of age, ranged from 5 to 12%. Despite these statistics representing an overlooked population in research on virginity—African American virgins—, previous virginity research has failed to explore characteristics that influence young adults’ absence of sexual behavior. Such characteristics may be different for African Americans in light of their diverse cultural experiences (Mandara et al. 2003). Some studies, however, have examined whether race was associated with virginity status and found significant links. One study found race to significantly predict virginity status for females and not males. Black women were less likely to report being virgins compared to their white counterparts (Eisenberg et al. 2009), whereas other research has found that race predicted virginity status for males and females. Asian males were less likely to report be sexually activity after age 18 compared to white men (Haydon et al. 2014). Though it is important to examine racial/ethnic variations in the prevalence of virginity status, less attention has focused on within-group variation in factors associated with virginity status. The present study explores the correlates and predictors of virginity among African American young adults. The results of this study could increase our understanding of sexual development among African American young adults and highlight heterogeneity of this population. Findings may also demonstrate how assumptions about the sexual activity of African Americans, often inherent in the research field, should be resisted in order to more adequately assess sexuality among African Americans throughout the life course.
Decades of literature have identified multiple individual-level, familial-level, interpersonal-level, and community-level factors associated with sexual activity among African American adolescents and young adults, including biological factors (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity, age, skin tone) (Landor and Halpern 2016; Newman and Zimmerman 2000), social factors (e.g., religiosity, cognitive performance, peer influence, neighborhood, academic achievement) (Landor et al. 2011; House et al. 2010; Ramirez-Valles et al. 2002), biosocial factors (e.g., BMI, physical attractiveness) (Wingood et al. 2002), psychological factors (e.g., depression, anxiety, self-esteem) (Brown et al. 2006; Longmore et al. 2004), family factors (e.g., family structure, parent–child relationship quality) (Simons et al. 2013, 2016), and factors associated with attitudes and beliefs including attitudes about marriage (Carroll et al. 2007). Past studies also show associations between sexual activity and sexual abuse (West et al. 2000). Yet previous research has not examined whether such factors are associated with virginity among African American young adults. Characteristics that predict virginity among African American young adults may be consistent with factors that contribute to their sexual activity but such factors are not inevitably the converse of these previously identified factors and may vary. We test these previously identified individual-level, familial-level, interpersonal-level, and community-level factors associated with sexual activity as correlates and predictors of virginity. Additionally, although prior studies have examined sexual activity in young adulthood (Landor and Halpern 2015), most of the literature on virginity has been based on samples of adolescents as this work attempted to better understand the protective and risk factors associated with STI acquisition and unintended pregnancy (Zimmer-Gembeck and Helfand 2008). Characteristics that influence virginity should not be simply applied across all developmental periods. It is also important to note that despite various classification of virginity (“technical virgins” vs “total abstainers”) (Sewell and Strassberg 2015; Uecker et al. 2008; Woody et al. 2000), this study conceptualizes virgins as those who have never had vaginal sexual intercourse with an opposite-sex partner. This conceptualization is consistent with qualitative studies conducted with African American samples (Haglund 2003).
To fill gaps in our understating of African American young adults’ virginity, the purpose of the current study is to examine the individual, familial, interpersonal, and community-level correlates and predictors of African American young adults’ virginity to determine which (if any) of these previously identified characteristics predict virginity status. As noted, the contextual and developmental issues that influence virginity in African American young adults is not fully understood. Moreover, if identifiable, such characteristics could provide the foundation for understanding African American sexuality beyond adolescence and into young adulthood. This study also allows us to examine virginity during a normative period of transitions in sexuality. Two theories guide our study. The ecological theory, and previous research discussed above, frames the individual, familial, interpersonal, and community-level correlates and predictors of virginity among African American young adults, and the life course theory emphasizes how social timing and sequences of life experiences and transitions (such as sexual development) impact trajectories (Bronfenbrenner 1979; Buhi and Goodson 2007; Carpenter 2010; Elder et al. 2003). By focusing on the correlates and predictors of virginity for African American young adults, a group most likely to engage in sexual activity, we may gain a more clear picture of influential factors that may be unique to this population. In addition, understanding virginity may help inform public health and policy efforts to address a broader range of issues related to sexually active and inactive young adults.
Methods
Participants and Procedures
This study analyzed data from the Family and Community Health Study (FACHS), a longitudinal, multisite investigation of over 800 African American families (475 in Iowa and 422 in Georgia) at study recruitment (Simons et al. 2002). FACHS is the largest in-depth panel study of African Americans in the U.S. and was designed to explore contextual effects on the health and development of African American youth and their parents. Recruited families lived in neighborhoods that varied on demographic characteristics such as racial composition (percentage African American) and economic level (percentage of families with children living below the poverty line). Neighborhoods were defined using 1990 census block group (BGs). Based on these criteria, 259 BGs were identified, 115 in Georgia and 144 in Iowa. Data from the Iowa and Georgia subsamples were merged due to considerable consistency in family demographic and family process characteristics (Cutrona et al. 2000; Murry et al. 2001). The study families were randomly selected and recruited from rosters of all African American families in these BGs that had a fifth grader. Data are secondary and completely de-identified therefore the project did not constitute research with human subjects and was exempt from Institutional Review Board review. The first wave of data was collected in 1998 (Mage = 10.5), wave 2-2001 (Mage = 12.5), wave 3-2004 (Mage = 15.5), wave 4-2007 (Mage = 18.8), wave 5-2009 (Mage = 21.5), and wave 6-2011 (Mage = 23.5). The current study sample is composed of 554 target individuals (219 males, 335 females) who participated in all waves used in the current study and reported heterosexual virginity or sexual activity. The current study uses data waves in which data were available on study variables and consistent with previous research and theory (see Table 1).
Self-report questionnaires were administered in an interview format using a computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI). To enhance rapport and cultural understanding, African American college students and community members served as field researchers to collect data from the families (Graham et al. 2018; Sankare et al. 2015). The interviews required two visits to the family’s home or a nearby location, each about 90 min, with two interviewers. Adolescents and their parents were interviewed at the same time in separate rooms. In addition, study participants took part in 20-min videotaped parent–child interaction tasks that were coded using the Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales (see Melby and Conger 2001). Approximately 12 years following the initial video recordings in the first wave of data, 6 trained female observers used these videotapes to rate targets and primary caregivers skin tone and physical attractiveness. All raters received approximately 8.0 h of initial training (e.g., personnel procedures, rating manual, rating practice, feedback on ratings, written quiz on rating system, and university assurance training). After it was determined that the team members achieved close agreement on skin tone ratings, coders independently scored the study videotapes. Using the intraclass correlation to evaluate interobserver agreement (Shrout and Fleiss 1979), the ICC for the videotape scoring for target skin tone was .82, which is acceptable for these types of data (Mitchell 1979).
Measures
Virginity status was assessed using a single item that asked participants “Have you ever had sex with an opposite-sex partner?” after informing them that “Next, we would like to ask you about your attitudes regarding sexual intercourse.”
Individual-Level Factors
Body mass index (BMI) was computed using the standard formula of weight/height2 (kg/m2). We classified BMI into categories established by the CDC: underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal/healthy weight (BMI > 18.5 and < 24.9), overweight (BMI > 25.0 and < 29.9), and obese (BMI > 30.0). Physical attractiveness assessed whether participants were considered physically unappealing/appealing to a subjective rater. Responses ranged from 1 (mainly unattractive) to 3 (mainly attractive). Research has found attractiveness to be stable from approximately childhood to young adulthood (Alley 1993; Zebrowitz et al. 1993). Skin tone was coded from videotapes obtained as a part of the FACHS data collection process (Landor et al. 2013). Raters coded skin tone from 1 (light skin) to 3 (dark skin). Education was based on the question “What is the highest level of education completed?” Responses were 1 (less than high school), 2 (high school graduate), and 3 (some college/college graduate). Self-reported cognitive performance were based on 5 items such as “How well can you…learn reading and writing skills?” Responses ranged from 1 (not well) to 3 (very well). Cronbach’s alpha was .60. General health status was measured using the item “How would you describe your health right now?” Responses ranged from 1 (not very good) to 5 (excellent). Anxiety was based on 12 items such as “In the last year, did you often worry a lot about being on time.” Responses were 0 (no) to 1 (yes). Cronbach’s alpha was .75. Depression was based on 20 items that asked “In the last year, was there a time when nothing was fun for you?” Responses were 0 (no) to 1 (yes). Cronbach’s alpha was .89. Self-esteem was based on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg 1965) composed of 10 items such as “On the whole, I am satisfied with myself” Scale ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Cronbach’s alpha was .82. Self-image was based on 5 items such as “How popular are you?” Scale ranged from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very). Cronbach’s alpha was .61. Religious importance was based on the question “How important is religious/spiritual beliefs to your day-to-day life?” Responses ranged from 1 (not at all important) to 4 (very important). Religious attendance was based on the question “How often in the past month did you attend church services? Responses were 0 (never) and 1 (at least once). Previous sexual abuse included 3 items: “Prior to age 15, “did an adult/someone in charge of or responsible for you ever…touch you sexually?”, “…persuade you to engage in a sexual act?” and “…force you to engage in a sexual act?” Participants who reported yes to any of these items were classified as having experienced sexual abuse. Attitudes toward marriage were assessed using 7 items such as “Marriage leads to a fuller life” Responses ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Cronbach’s alpha was .66. Arrest was based on the question “How many times have you been arrested?” Responses were 0 (never) and 1 (1 or more times). Incarceration was based on 2 items “How many times have you been in jail?” and “…in prison?” Responses were 0 (never) 1 (more than once). Participants who reported yes to any of these items were classified as having been incarcerated. Cigarette use was measured based on the item “Have you ever smoked cigarettes?” Responses were 0 (no) to 1 (yes).
Family-Level Factors
Family Structure was coded so that 0 represents being in a single-parent household and 1 represents being in other family types (e.g., married—biological parent/step-parent, cohabitating-parent). Parental quality was assessed using the item “How satisfied are you in your relationship with your primary caregiver?” Responses ranged from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied). Siblings was based on the number of siblings: 0 (no siblings) and 1 (yes siblings).
Interpersonal-Level Factors
Relationship status was assessed using the question “What best describes your current relationship status?” Respondents were classified as 1 (in a relationship) and 0 (not in a relationship). Currently married was assessed using the question “What best describes your current relationship status?” Responses were 0 (not currently married) and 1 (currently married). Antisocial friends was assessed with 14 items such as “How many of participants’ closest friends stolen something inexpensive?” Responses ranged from 1 (none of them) to 4 (all of them). Cronbach’s alpha was .83.
Community-Level Factors
Neighborhood social disorder was based on 6 items that asked participants about their neighborhood in the past 12 months such as “How often was there a fight in which a weapon like a gun/knife was used?” Responses ranged from 1 (never) to 3 (often). Cronbach’s alpha was .81.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to show the correlates and predictors of virginity among African Americans young adults and, based on previous research literature and theoretical frameworks of ecological and life course theories, the individual, familial, interpersonal, and community-level correlates and predictors associated with their virginity status. Bivariate relationships of sample characteristics and virginity status were tested using Chi square and t test analysis. Next, multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression to examine the individual, familial, interpersonal, and community-level correlates and predictors associated with virginity. We report the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs); no adjustment for multiple comparisons was made (see Feise 2002; Rothman 1990). All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 24.
Results
Among 554 African American young adults who met study criteria, 82 (14.8%) reported never having had sexual intercourse. Among males, 14.2% reported never having had sexual intercourse; among females, 15.2% reported never having had sexual intercourse. Table 2 presents descriptive statistics and percentages of virginity status by individual, familial, interpersonal, and community-level characteristics. Bivariate analysis revealed that lower educational attainment, lower self-reported cognitive performance, family structure (e.g., being in a two-parent household), higher parental quality, and fewer antisocial friends were all significantly associated with sexual inactivity. For males, BMI, lower educational attainment, lower self-reported cognitive performance, sexual abuse, cigarette use, and family structure (e.g., being in a two-parent household) were significantly associated with being a virgin. Fewer significant characteristics were found between females who were sexually active and virgins. Females who reported lower educational attainment, lower self-reported cognitive performance, higher parental quality, and fewer antisocial friends were virgins in young adulthood.
Multivariate analysis is shown in Table 3. Significant results for male individual-level factors indicated that overweight males had higher odds of being virgins compared to underweight males (OR = 5.79) and males who were rated as “average” in their physical attractiveness were more likely to be virgins compared to males rated as “unattractive” (OR = 6.64). Compared to males with less than a high school education, males who graduated from high school and either reported some college or was a college graduate had higher odds of being virgins (OR = 5.62 and OR = 3.75, respectively). Males who reported higher self-reported cognitive performance had lower odds of virginity (OR = .21). Males with higher anxiety (OR = 5.48) or self-esteem (OR = 5.80) were more likely to be virgins. Compared to males who reported religion as not at all important, males who reported religion as very important were more likely to report being a virgin (OR = 4.55). In addition, there were trends toward being a virgin among males who attended religious services (OR = 3.41), reported being arrested (OR = 3.98), and used cigarettes (OR = 3.08). Fewer associations between individual-level factors and virginity were found among females. Nevertheless, similar to males, compared to females with less than a high school education, females who graduated from high school and either reported some college or was a collage graduate were more likely to be virgins (OR = 11.25 and OR = 3.44, respectively). Females who reported more self-reported cognitive performance had lower odds of virginity (OR = .12). Females who reported cigarette use had lower odds of being a virgin (OR = .27). A trend toward being a virgin was also found among females; females who reported more anxiety were more likely to be virgins (OR = 8.47).
Among familial-level factors, males who reported being from two-parent households had higher odds of being a virgin (OR = 3.72) whereas females who reported more parental quality were more likely to be virgins (OR = 2.49). Results for interpersonal-level factors show that males in a relationship (OR = .34) and with more antisocial friends (OR = .09) had lower odds of being a virgin. No significant associations were found among females. Lastly, among community-level factors, living in a neighborhood with social disorder increased the odds of males being virgins (OR = 5.49). No significant finding were shown among females.
Discussion
Virginity among African American young adults in our sample is consistent with national estimates (Chandra et al. 2013; Eisenberg et al. 2009) and show that not all African American young adults have engaged in sexual activity despite the exclusive focus on sexual activity of African Americans that has produced an incomplete picture of their sexuality. Our study is one of the first to expand the discourse on African Americans sexuality by examining sexual inactivity among African American young adults and exploring within-group variation in factors associated with their virginity status. Findings show that approximately 15% of African Americans remain virgins even into young adulthood. Moreover, this study demonstrates that myriad individual-level, familial-level, interpersonal-level, and community-level correlates and predicators of virginity play a salient role in the lives of African American young adults.
Bivariate associations of individual-level, familial-level, interpersonal-level, and community-level correlates and predicators of virginity for young adults were mostly consistent with findings in adolescent studies. However, this past research failed to investigate within-group variations in characteristics that influence the virginity of African American young adults. Strong associations between individual-level factors (educational attainment and cognitive performance) and virginity add to a large body of research documenting the influence of individual characteristics on sexuality and sexual behavior (House et al. 2010). Findings are also consistent with longitudinal and cross-sectional studies with White samples (House et al. 2010; Lammers et al. 2000). Significant associations among familial-level factors (family structure and parental quality) and virginity suggests that family remains an important influence on sexuality even into young adulthood. Our findings of young adults are similar with other studies that show family structure (e.g., being in a two-parent household) as well as high parental quality to increase the likelihood of sexual abstinence among adolescents (Miller et al. 2001). Additionally, our results regarding an association between the interpersonal-level characteristic of having antisocial friends and virginity add to the literature showing that having fewer antisocial friends was associated with being a virgin (Jaccard et al. 2005). In sum, our findings suggest that factors associated with virginity status often documented during adolescence and or with less racially diverse samples may extend to African American young adults.
Bivariate results also underscore gender differences. For males, we found additional factors associated with being a virgin: BMI, sexual abuse, and cigarette use. Consistent with previous studies (i.e., Halpern et al. 2005), BMI was associated with a greater likelihood of being a virgin. However, past research has often only focused on White female populations. Our findings suggest that this association may extend to African American males. Sexual abuse was also associated with virginity for males. This adds to research documenting the impact of sexual abuse on the sexual activity of males (Homma et al. 2012), mainly African American males. While cigarette use has been linked to sexual activity, particularly high-risk sexual activities (Guo et al. 2002), our results regarding the association between cigarette use and virginity suggest that the direction of the association found in previous studies on sexual activity using White samples may be different when examining virginity of African American males. For females, cigarette use, parental quality, and fewer antisocial friends were identified as additional factors related to their sexual inactivity. Contrary to results of males, cigarette use was associated with sexual activity (not being a virgin) which is similar to the finding from Guo et al. (2002). Our finding that parental quality was associated with virginity is consistent with previous studies showing this significant association for females and not males using predominately White adolescent samples (Rose et al. 2005). Fewer antisocial friends were also associated with virginity which is consistent with a study by Mandara et al. (2003) of African American adolescents.
Furthermore, our multivariate analysis showed that while these factors remained significant, other factors became significant such as physical attractiveness, anxiety, self-esteem, and religion for males. Interestingly, males rated as average compared to unattractive, had a greater likelihood of being a virgin. A large body of research has documented that physically attractive males were more likely to become sexually active earlier and had more sexual partners (Rhodes et al. 2005). This research, however, has not explored the role of physical attractiveness of African American males on their virginity. Our findings suggest that this pattern may vary for African American young adult males. Anxiety also increased the likelihood that males would be virgins. This also relates to qualitative work that highlights the anxiety that males have about the potential loss of their virginity (Caron and Hinman 2013). Consistent with previous research, our findings demonstrate that self-esteem also increased the likelihood of being a virgin (Longmore et al. 2004). Our results that religious males had a greater likelihood of being virgins adds to decades of research documenting that role of religion in virginity status among African American and Whites adolescents and young adults (Rew and Wong 2006). Multivariate analysis for females revealed that while education, cognitive performance, cigarette use, and parental quality remained significant predictors of virginity, the association with antisocial friends was no longer significant.
Taken together, our findings extend research on sexuality among African American young adults and underscore the important variability that exist in the sexual experiences of African Americans as highlighted by the salience of myriad individual, familial, interpersonal, and community-level factors associated with their virginity. Our results demonstrate unique differences in the correlates and predictors of the virginity of African American young adults that are not necessarily in contrast with previously identified factors linked to sexual activity among this population and not always analogous to factors found in prior studies that combine all racial/ethnic groups rather than focusing on within-group variation.
Although we cannot ignore the high rates of sexual activity among African American adolescents and young adults and deleterious consequences of sex that disproportionately impacts this population, we should not simultaneously make assumptions that all African Americans engage in sexual activity. The results of this study challenge discourse on African Americans sexuality by increasing our understanding of sexual development among African American young adults and highlighting the heterogeneity of this population—not all African Americans engage in sexual activity. Additionally, we should not overlook within-group variation in factors associated with the virginity of African Americans. Such assumptions often inherent in the field should be considered in order to more adequately assess sexuality among African Americans throughout the life course.
There are a few limitations of the present study that should be noted. First, the subjective measure of physical attractiveness may not account for differences in perceptions of attractiveness, though research shows that ratings of physical attractiveness are stable from childhood to young adulthood (Alley 1993; Zebrowitz et al. 1993). In addition, we recognize the potential influence of the timing of study variables on outcomes though study variables were based on previous literature and theory. However, we believe that our findings demonstrate that strong significant associations remain over time. We also note caution in the interpretation of our results as there may be a chance that our results could be false positives because we did not apply correction for multiple testing to our tests of significance. Future research should replicate and confirm the observed associations using African American samples. Lastly, we note that we may not have examined all potential factors that contribute to the virginity of African American young adults. Despite these limitations, better understanding the correlates and predictors of virginity among African Americans may have significant implications for future health behaviors. Future longitudinal research is needed to fully understand how the factors identified in young adulthood contribute to sexuality into middle to late adulthood. Studies should also examine the implication of the virginity of African Americans over time to better address health from a more broad perspective.
References
Alley, T. R. (1993). The developmental stability of facial attractiveness: New longitudinal data and a review. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 265–278.
Bazargan, M., Kelly, E. M., Stein, J. A., Husaini, B. A., & Bazargan, S. H. (2000). Correlates of HIV risk-taking behaviors among African-American college students: The effect of HIV knowledge, motivation, and behavioral skills. Journal of the National Medical Association, 92(8), 391.
Boislard, M. A., van de Bongardt, D., & Blais, M. (2016). Sexuality (and lack thereof) in adolescence and early adulthood: A review of the literature. Behavioral sciences, 6(1), 8.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brown, L. K., Tolou-Shams, M., Lescano, C., Houck, C., Zeidman, J., Pugatch, D., et al. (2006). Depressive symptoms as a predictor of sexual risk among African American adolescents and young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(3), 444-e1.
Buhi, E. R., & Goodson, P. (2007). Predictors of adolescent sexual behavior and intention: A theory-guided systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(1), 4–21.
Caron, S. L., & Hinman, S. P. (2013). “I took his v-card”: An exploratory analysis of college student stories involving male virginity loss. Sexuality and Culture, 17(4), 525–539.
Carpenter, L. (2005). Virginity lost: An intimate portrait of first sexual experiences. New York: NYU Press.
Carpenter, L. M. (2010). Gendered sexuality over the life course: A conceptual framework. Sociological Perspectives, 53(2), 155–177.
Carroll, J. S., Willoughby, B., Badger, S., Nelson, L. J., McNamara Barry, C., & Madsen, S. D. (2007). So close, yet so far away: The impact of varying marital horizons on emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(3), 219–247.
Centers for Disease Control. (2016). Trends in the prevalence of sexual behavior and HIV Testing. www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/2015/ss6506_updated.pdf. Published June 2016. Accessed April 10, 2016.
Chandra, A., Copen, C. E., & Mosher, W. D. (2013). Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual identity in the United States: Data from the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth. In International handbook on the demography of sexuality (pp. 45–66). Netherlands: Springer.
Cutrona, C. E., Russell, D. W., Hessling, R. M., Brown, P. A., & Murry, V. (2000). Direct and moderating effects of community context on the psychological well-being of African American women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1088.
D’souza, G., Kreimer, A. R., Viscidi, R., Pawlita, M., Fakhry, C., Koch, W. M., et al. (2007). Case–control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 356(19), 1944–1956.
Dariotis, J. K., Sifakis, F., Pleck, J. H., Astone, N. M., & Sonenstein, F. L. (2011). Racial and ethnic disparities in sexual risk behaviors and STDs during young men’s transition to adulthood. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 43(1), 51–59.
Eaton, D. K., Lowry, R., Brener, N. D., Kann, L., Romero, L., & Wechsler, H. (2011). Trends in human immunodeficiency virus–and sexually transmitted disease–related risk behaviors among US high school students, 1991–2009. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(4), 427–433.
Eisenberg, M. L., Shindel, A. W., Smith, J. F., Lue, T. F., & Walsh, T. J. (2009). Who is the 40-year-old virgin and where did he/she come from? Data from the National Survey of Family Growth. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6(8), 2154–2161.
Elder Jr., G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In Handbook of the life course (pp. 3–19). US: Springer.
Feise, R. J. (2002). Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2(1), 8.
Graham, L. F., Scott, L., Lopeyok, E., Douglas, H., Gubrium, A., & Buchanan, D. (2018). Outreach Strategies to Recruit Low-Income African American Men to Participate in Health Promotion Programs and Research: Lessons From the Men of Color Health Awareness (MOCHA) Project. American Journal of Men's Health, 12(5), 1307–1316.
Guo, J., Chung, I. J., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Abbott, R. D. (2002). Developmental relationships between adolescent substance use and risky sexual behavior in young adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(4), 354–362.
Haglund, K. (2003). Sexually abstinent African American adolescent females’ descriptions of abstinence. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 35(3), 231–236.
Halpern, C. T., & Haydon, A. A. (2012). Sexual timetables for oral-genital, vaginal, and anal intercourse: Sociodemographic comparisons in a nationally representative sample of adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 102(6), 1221–1228.
Halpern, C. T., King, R. B., Oslak, S. G., & Udry, J. R. (2005). Body mass index, dieting, romance, and sexual activity in adolescent girls: Relationships over time. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(4), 535–559.
Halpern, C. T., Waller, M. W., Spriggs, A., & Hallfors, D. D. (2006). Adolescent predictors of emerging adult sexual patterns. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(6), 926-e1-e10.
Haydon, A. A., Cheng, M. M., Herring, A. H., McRee, A. L., & Halpern, C. T. (2014). Prevalence and predictors of sexual inexperience in adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(2), 221–230.
Homma, Y., Wang, N., Saewyc, E., & Kishor, N. (2012). The relationship between sexual abuse and risky sexual behavior among adolescent boys: A meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(1), 18–24.
House, L. D., Bates, J., Markham, C. M., & Lesesne, C. (2010). Competence as a predictor of sexual and reproductive health outcomes for youth: A systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46(3), S7–S22.
Jaccard, J., Blanton, H., & Dodge, T. (2005). Peer influences on risk behavior: An analysis of the effects of a close friend. Developmental Psychology, 41(1), 135.
Lammers, C., Ireland, M., Resnick, M., & Blum, R. (2000). Influences on adolescents’ decision to postpone onset of sexual intercourse: A survival analysis of virginity among youths aged 13 to 18 years. Journal of Adolescent Health, 26(1), 42–48.
Landor, A. M., & Halpern, C. (2015). Prevalence of high-risk sexual behaviors among monoracial and multiracial groups from a national sample: Are multiracial young adults at greater risk? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(2), 467–475.
Landor, A. M., & Halpern, C. (2016). The enduring significance of skin tone: Linking skin tone, attitudes toward marriage and cohabitation, and sexual behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(5), 986–1002.
Landor, A. M., Simons, L. G., Simons, R. L., Brody, G. H., & Gibbons, F. X. (2011). The role of religiosity in the relationship between parents, peers, and adolescent risky sexual behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9598-2.
Landor, A. M., Simons, L. G., Simons, R. L., Brody, G. H., Bryant, C. M., Gibbons, F. X., Granberg, E. M., & Melby, J. N. (2013). Exploring the impact of skin tone on family dynamics and race-related outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 817.
Longmore, M. A., Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Rudolph, J. L. (2004). Self-esteem, depressive symptoms, and adolescents’ sexual onset. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(3), 279–295.
Mandara, J., Murray, C. B., & Bangi, A. K. (2003). Predictors of African American adolescent sexual activity: An ecological framework. Journal of Black Psychology, 29(3), 337–356.
Melby, J. N., & Conger, R. D. (2001). The Iowa family interaction rating scales: Instrument summary. In P. Kerig & K. Lindahl (Eds.), Family observational coding systems: Resources for systematic research (pp. 33–58). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Miller, B. C., Benson, B., & Galbraith, K. A. (2001). Family relationships and adolescent pregnancy risk: A research synthesis. Developmental Review, 21(1), 1–38.
Mitchell, S. K. (1979). Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 376–390.
Mosher, W. D., Chandra, A., & Jones, J. (2005). Sexual behavior and selected health measures: Men and women 15–44 years of age, United States, 2002.
Murry, V. M., Brown, P. A., Brody, G. H., Cutrona, C. E., & Simons, R. L. (2001). Racial discrimination as a moderator of the links among stress, maternal psychological functioning, and family relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(4), 915–926.
Newman, P. A., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Gender differences in HIV-related sexual risk behavior among urban African American youth: A multivariate approach. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12(4), 308.
Pflieger, J. C., Cook, E. C., Niccolai, L. M., & Connell, C. M. (2013). Racial/ethnic differences in patterns of sexual risk behavior and rates of sexually transmitted infections among female young adults. American Journal of Public Health, 103(5), 903–909.
Ramirez-Valles, J., Zimmerman, M. A., & Juarez, L. (2002). Gender differences of neighborhood and social control processes: A study of the timing of first intercourse among low-achieving, urban, African American youth. Youth & Society, 33(3), 418–441.
Reese, B. M., Choukas-Bradley, S., Herring, A. H., & Halpern, C. T. (2014). Correlates of adolescent and young adult sexual initiation patterns. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46(4), 211–221.
Rew, L., & Wong, Y. J. (2006). A systematic review of associations among religiosity/spirituality and adolescent health attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38(4), 433–442.
Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. W., & Peters, M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(2), 186–201.
Rose, A., Koo, H. P., Bhaskar, B., Anderson, K., White, G., & Jenkins, R. R. (2005). The influence of primary caregivers on the sexual behavior of early adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(2), 135–144.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image (Vol. 11, p. 326). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rothman, K. J. (1990). No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology, 1, 43–46.
Sankare, I. C., Bross, R., Brown, A., Pino, H. E., Jones, L. F., Morris, D. M., … Kahn, K. L. (2015). Strategies to build trust and recruit African American and Latino community residents for health research: A cohort study. Clinical and Translational Science, 8(5), 412–420.
Sewell, K. K., & Strassberg, D. S. (2015). How do heterosexual undergraduate students define having sex? A new approach to an old question. Journal of sex research, 52(5), 507–516.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420.
Simons, L. G., Burt, C. H., Tambling, R. B. (2013). Identifying Mediators of the Influence of Family Factors on Risky Sexual Behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(4), 460–470.
Simons, L. G., Sutton, T. E., Simons, R. L., Gibbons, F. X., & Murry, V. M. (2016). Mechanisms that link parenting practices to adolescents’ risky sexual behavior: A test of six competing theories. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(2), 255–270.
Simons, R. L., Lin, K., Gordon, L. C., Brody, G. H., Murry, V. M., & Conger, R. D. (2002). Community differences in the association between parenting practices and child conduct problems. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 331–345.
Tolman, D. L., & McClelland, S. I. (2011). Normative sexuality development in adolescence: A decade in review, 2000–2009. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 242–255.
Uecker, J. E., Angotti, N., & Regnerus, M. D. (2008). Going most of the way: “Technical virginity” among American adolescents. Social Science Research, 37(4), 1200–1215.
West, C. M., Williams, L. M., & Siegel, J. A. (2000). Adult sexual revictimization among Black women sexually abused in childhood: A prospective examination of serious consequences of abuse. Child Maltreatment, 5(1), 49–57.
Wingood, G. M., DiClemente, R. J., Harrington, K., & Davies, S. L. (2002). Body image and African American females’ sexual health. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-based Medicine, 11(5), 433–439.
Woody, J. D., Russel, R., D’Souza, H. J., & Woody, J. K. (2000). Adolescent non-coital sexual activity: Comparisons of virgins and non-virgins. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 25(4), 261–268.
Zebrowitz, L. A., Olson, K., & Hoffman, K. (1993). Stability of babyfaceness and attractiveness across the life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3), 453.
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Helfand, M. (2008). Ten years of longitudinal research on US adolescent sexual behavior: Developmental correlates of sexual intercourse, and the importance of age, gender and ethnic background. Developmental Review, 28(2), 153–224.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (MH48165, MH62669) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (029136-02). Additional funding for this project was provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the IRB of the University of Georgia and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Landor, A.M., Simons, L.G. Correlates and Predictors of Virginity Among Heterosexual African American Young Adults. Sexuality & Culture 23, 943–961 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09600-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09600-y