Abstract
Purpose
Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is a poor prognosis subtype and is the most prevalent in non-Caucasian populations. The presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been associated with poor prognosis in melanoma. A large cohort of ALM cases was studied to determine status of TIL and its association with outcome.
Methods
All patients with cutaneous melanoma presenting from 2005 to 2012 at Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas in Peru were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathological information was obtained from the medical charts. A prospective evaluation of TIL was performed. Analysis of association between ALM and clinicopathological features including TIL as well as survival analysis compared the outcome of ALM to whole group and extremity NALM was performed.
Results
537 ALM from a total of 824 cutaneous melanoma cases were studied. Older age (p = 0.022), higher Breslow (p = 0.008) and ulceration (p < 0.001) were found to be more frequent in ALM. Acral had worse overall survival (OS) compared with the whole group (p = 0.04). Clinical stage (CS) I–II patients had a median OS of 5.3 (95% CI 4.3–6.2) for ALM and 9.2 (95% CI 5.0–7.0) for extremity NALM (p = 0.016). Grade 0 (absence of TIL), I, II and III were found in 7.5, 34.5, 32.1, and 25.9%, respectively. Lower TIL grade was associated with larger tumor size (p = 0.003), higher Breslow (p = 0.001), higher Clark level (p = 0.007), higher CS (p = 0.002), extremity location (p = 0.048), histological subtype ALM (p = 0.024) and better OS (p = 0.001).
Conclusions
ALM is highly prevalent in Peru and carries poor outcome. Lower TIL levels were associated with poor outcome and ALM.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
Melanoma is the most lethal form of skin cancer. Histologically, four major subtypes are recognized: superficial spreading, nodular, lentigo maligna and acral lentiginous. Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) occurs on the palms, soles and subungueal (SU) areas. ALM is the least common subtype in Caucasian populations but appears to be the most prevalent in Hispanic patients in population-based cancer registries and some recent series from South America [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Acral lentiginous melanoma has been associated with a worse prognosis, and some authors have hypothesized that the lower survival is primarily attributable to a delay in diagnosis and more advanced stage at presentation in ALM [2, 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. However, some studies have reported that ALM harbors shorter survival than cutaneous non-acral lentiginous melanoma (NALM) when controlled for stage. Moreover, some recent reports suggest that ALM carries some biologically aggressive markers that could be responsible for the poor outcome seen even in early stages of these tumors [2, 16,17,18,19,20,21].
The presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is associated with regression in melanoma and was a surrogate indicator of the immune host response. Regression is categorized by Clark et al. [22] into three categories (absent, no-brisk and brisk) based on the presence and location of TIL among melanoma cells. Multiple studies have described favorable prognostic value of TIL in melanoma [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]; however, some studies did not confirm this association [28, 30, 32,33,34].
One of the reasons for discrepant results regarding TIL and melanoma prognosis may be the lack of standard evaluation of TIL. Recently, Azimi et al. described a four-tier system TIL grading (0–3) that takes into account TIL distribution and density. They found a significant correlation between TIL grade and other melanoma features like thickness, mitotic rate and SLN status as well as survival. Patients with grade 3 TIL tumors had 100% survival at 5-year [31].
Only small case series of ALM from South America have been published to date, and evaluation of the relationship between TIL and ALM has not been reported [4,5,6,7]. Herein, we present a single-institution series of Peruvian patients with cutaneous melanoma, enriched with high numbers of ALM, in which we explore the role of TIL in the ALM subgroup.
Materials and methods
All patients with cutaneous melanoma diagnosis at Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima-Peru, from 2005 to 2012 were included in the study.
Acral Lentiginous Melanoma was defined by anatomic location as palmar, plantar or subungual. Clinicopathological parameters included in the analysis were: age, sex, anatomic location, tumor (Breslow) thickness, Clark level, ulceration, regression, mitoses, perineural infiltration (PNI), perivascular infiltration (PVI), margin status, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or lymph node dissection procedure, and the presence of positive lymph nodes. Additionally, we calculated the probability to find sentinel node involvement with the Risk of Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis (RMSLNM) Nomogram [35]. The score includes the following variables: age, thickness, Clark level and melanoma location [36]. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were prospectively evaluated by Institute pathologists (SCS, JSS and LCI) through the methodology described by Azimi et al. [31]. TILs were defined as lymphocytes infiltrating and disrupting tumor nests and/or in direct contact with tumor cells in H&E staining. The cases were classified into four grades (0–3) according to TIL density (mild, moderate, or marked) and distribution (focal, multifocal, or diffuse across the entire extent of the tumor) (Fig. 1).
Association analysis between clinicopathological features and ALM was performed using the Student’s t and Chi square tests.
Clinical follow-up was obtained from patient files at the Institute Archives, and survival status was obtained from Peruvian government web page (RENIEC) when there was not an appropriate follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from pathological diagnosis to the time of death or last follow-up. A survival analysis of ALM and NALM was performed in the whole population. A stage-matched (stages I–IV) survival analysis was additionally performed in the subset of malignant melanoma in the extremities (upper and lower limbs location) [37].
Univariate Cox regression model was used to examine the association of clinical and pathologic variables with OS. Those features with significant association on univariate analysis (p ≤ 0.05) were entered into a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSSvs23. This study was approved by the institutional review board and received the code number 047-2015-CRP-DI-DICON/INEN. Personal and filiation data including identity of every patient were protected with an added code in the excel table. It is a retrospective case series that does not have any activity or contact with the patients.
Results
Clinicopathological features
Demographic, clinical and pathological features of this melanoma cohort (n = 824) are shown in Table 1. The median age at diagnosis was 62 (range 3–98) years and with a slight male prevalence (50.4%). Most frequent subtype was ALM (n = 537, 61.2%). There were 287 NALM cases and 84 (29.2%) of them were located in extremities NALM. The most frequent ALM location was lower limb (89.4%). The subungual location represented 17.7% and was more commonly located on the toes (57.9%). The most frequent CS were II (37.7%) and III (36.4%). The median Breslow was 4.0 mm (range 0.1–95.0 mm) and node involvement was found in 40.4% of 710 cases with evaluated regional lymph nodes (Table 1).
A large proportion of patients in this series lacked documentation of the presence of regression; however, in cases with available information, tumors were ulcerated in 62.2% (423/680), mitotic index >1 in 65.2% (353/542) (median mitotic index = 3), PNI in 20.4% (118/578), had LVI in 25.4% (157/617) and positive margin status in 18.3% (132/720) of patients (Table 1).
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was performed in 365 (41.6%) cases and 118 (32.3%) were positive. We evaluated the probability to find sentinel node involvement with the RMSLNM-nomogram in the 365 cases and we found a significant correlation (p < 0.0001).
Compared to NALM, ALM cases were associated with older age (62.5 vs 57.2 years, p = 0.022), thicker depth (Breslow 4.3 vs 4 mm, p = 0.008), T3–4 stage (77.6 vs 68.9%, p = 0.002), advanced CS (III–IV) (48.8 vs 39.5%, p = 0.001), lower rates of involved margins (83.9 vs 77.4%, p = 0.049), more frequent ulceration (68.3 vs 47.3%; p < 0.001), higher rates of PNI (23.8 vs 14.5%; p = 0.009), higher rates of LVI (28 vs 20.4%; p = 0.047) and higher Clark Level (IV–V) (80.3 vs 62.7%; p < 0.001) (Table 1).
When ALM (n = 537) was compared with NALM occurring on extremities (n = 84), ALM cases were more frequent in females (p = 0.003), presented at older age (62.5 vs 52.5 years, p < 0.001), thicker (Breslow 4.3 vs 4 mm, p = 0.001), ulceration (p = 0.014) and had higher rates of PNI (p = 0.033) than NALM. No differences regarding CS (p = 0.200), Clark level (p = 0.341), regression (p = 0.505), mitosis (p = 0.379), positive margin status (p = 0.363), microsatellitosis (p = 0.891), LVI (p = 0.840), lymph node involvement (p = 0.189) and TIL levels (p = 0.351) were found.
Lymphocyte infiltration in acral lentiginous melanoma vs non-acral lentiginous melanoma
Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were prospectively evaluated in 536 cases, and grade 0 (absence of TIL), grade I, II and III TIL were found in 7.5, 34.5, 32.1 and 25.9%, respectively. Grade III TILs were more frequent in NALM than in ALM (33.3 vs 22.6%, p = 0.033) (Table 1). Higher TIL grade was also associated with location on extremities (p = 0.048), histological subtype (p = 0.024), lower Breslow (p = 0.001), lower Clark level (p = 0.007), lower rates of T3–4 (p = 0.003), higher rates of CS I–II (p = 0.002) and lower RMSLNM-nomogram score (p = 0.036) (Table 2).
Survival analysis
The median follow-up was 5 years. Relationship between clinical and pathological features and overall survival (OS) in the entire melanoma cohort (n = 824) is shown in Table 3. Clinicopathological features associated with shorter OS on univariate analysis were: older age (p = 0.001), male gender (p < 0.001), Breslow >4 (p < 0.001), Clark level V (p < 0.001), T3–4 stage (p < 0.001), N2–3 stage (p < 0.001), CS IV (p < 0.001), ulceration (p < 0.001), mitotic index >1 (p < 0.001), positive margin status (p < 0.001), positive sentinel lymph node (p < 0.001) and RMSLNM-nomogram (p = 0.001). The ALM subtype was associated with shorter OS in the whole population (35 vs 46% at 5-year, p = 0.04) (Table 3). High-grade TIL was generally associated with longer OS (grade 0, I, II, III: 46.3, 26.0, 31.5, 39.8% at 5 years, p = 0.000). High-grade TILs were associated with longer OS in the ALM (grade 0, I, II and III: 46.8, 22.4, 28.5 and 37.0% at 5 years, p = 0.002) but not in the cutaneous NALM (grade 0, I, II and III: 27.1, 38.6, 38.8 and 44.2% at 5 year, p = 0.180) subsets (Table 3; Fig. 2).
Older age (p = 0.016), male gender (p < 0.001), CS III–IV (p < 0.001), ulceration (p = 0.001), positive margin status (p = 0.019) and lower TIL levels (p = 0.031) remained significantly associated with shorter OS on Cox proportional hazard model (Table 3).
The ALM subtype demonstrated a significantly reduced OS when compared with the extremity NALM cohort (34.7 vs 59.4% at 5 years, p = 0.001) (Fig. 2). There was also a shorter OS median for ALM than NALM occurring on extremities cases (5.3 years, 95% CI 4.3–6.2 vs. 9.2 years, 95% CI 5.0–7.0) when only CS I–II was evaluated (p = 0.016).
Clinicopathological features associated with reduced progression-free survival (PFS) on univariate analysis were: older age (p = 0.003), male gender (p < 0.001), Breslow >4 (p < 0.001), Clark level V (p < 0.001), T3–4 stage (p < 0.001), N2–3 stage (p < 0.001), CS IV (p < 0.001), ulceration (p < 0.001), mitotic index >1 (p < 0.001), positive margin status (p < 0.001) and positive sentinel lymph node (p < 0.001). The ALM subtype was associated with reduced PFS in the whole population (37.7 vs 25.5% at 5-year, p = 0.037). Lower TIL grade was associated with longer PFS (p = 0.02).
Gender (p < 0.001), histological sub-type (p = 0.047), CS (p < 0.001), ulceration (p = 0.001) and TIL levels (p = 0.002) remained significantly associated with PFS on Cox proportional hazard model.
Discussion
In our series, ALM was the most frequent melanoma subtype (61.2%) and demonstrated a shorter overall survival (5 year—overall survival 35.0%) [4,5,6,7]. A population-based study with more than 8000 ALM cases as well as a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) Program analysis of 17 population-based cancer registries with 1413 ALM cases similarly describes that American Hispanics have higher incidence rates of ALM than Caucasian population, and ALM survival is lower in Hispanic than Caucasian population (5-year melanoma-specific survival rates of 82.6 vs 72.8%) [2, 38]. Lino-Silva et al. recently published a retrospective series of more than 1200 mexican patients with cutaneous melanoma and found that ALM was the most frequent (44.1%) and was associated with shorter disease-specific survival in univariate (p = 0.001) and multivariate (p = 0.004) analysis [4].
Most of our ALM cases, including those of subungual location, arose on the feet. This finding is similar to what is described in previous studies and could be related to a constant sole exposure to trauma, irritation and maceration [8, 13,14,15, 39].
Acral lentiginous melanoma had lower survival rates when compared to cutaneous NALM in the whole population as well as NALM occurring on the extremities. Acral Lentiginous Melanoma patients in CS I and II had a shorter survival than those with extremity NALM (through a paired stage evaluation). Tumor thickness, node involvement, ulceration, mitotic index, positive margin status and older age are recognized prognostic factors for melanoma and we found that all these factors were higher in ALM than in cutaneous NALM. This explains the differences in survival between these two groups, even for patients with similar CS [2, 8, 9, 13,14,15,16, 40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Bello et al. [16] evaluated a series of 281 ALM and 843 extremity NALM and also found that ALM had a worse outcome in patients with similar CS. Bradford et al. [2] evaluated the data from 1413 ALM cases from the surveillance epidemiology and end results Program (SEER) and also found that these tumors are associated with worse prognosis than cutaneous NALM in stage-matched analysis.
From the molecular genetics point of view, the reported differences between ALM and NALM cutaneous melanoma, like lower rates of the serine-threonine protein kinase B-RAF (BRAF) mutations, higher rates of KIT mutations and higher vitamin D receptor expression, could also explain the poor prognosis of ALM [18, 19, 49,50,51].
Our analysis of TILs confirmed that a lower TIL grade was associated with poor outcome (p = 0.001) [31] and to ALM histopathological type (p = 0.012). This latter finding, to our knowledge, has not been previously reported. Therefore, low TIL grade could be added to aggressive features previously described to be more frequent in ALM and could also explain the poor prognosis of this melanoma subtype. Poor prognosis of ALM could be a reflection of a combination of unique biological nature coupled to a poor immune host response. Immune system modulation has become an important strategy in melanoma [23,24,25,26,27, 52,53,54,55,56], and TIL levels have demonstrated to behave as a biomarker for chemotherapy and immunotherapy [57, 58].
A potential weakness of our study is its retrospective fashion when recording some pathological features, a few of them not available for evaluation. Evaluation of TIL, however, was performed using a standardized method by more than one pathologist. Using the same methodology of Azimi et al. [31], we found higher rates of grade II–III TIL (58 vs 19.5%) in our series; however, we observed a similar association between lower TIL grade and both higher T stage and shorter survival.
Conclusions
Our study revealed that ALM is the most common subtype in the Peruvian population. Acral lentiginous melanoma was associated with clinicopathological features related to aggressive behavior and had a trend to shorter survival. Low levels of TIL were associated with shorter survival and to ALM. This novel finding suggests that a deficient immune activity would be responsible for ALM poor prognosis.
References
Piliang MP. Acral lentiginous melanoma. Clin Lab Med. 2011;31(2):281–8.
Bradford PT, Goldstein AM, McMaster ML, Tucker MA. Acral lentiginous melanoma: incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1986–2005. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145(4):427–34.
Wu XC, Eide MJ, King J, Saraiya M, Huang Y, Wiggins C, et al. Racial and ethnic variations in incidence and survival of cutaneous melanoma in the United States, 1999–2006. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:S26–37.
Lino-Silva LS, Dominguez-Rodriguez JA, Aguilar-Romero JM, Martinez-Said H, Salcedo-Hernandez RA, Garcia-Perez L, et al. Melanoma in Mexico: clinicopathologic features in a population with predominance of acral lentiginous subtype. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(13):4189–94.
Vazquez Vde L, Silva TB, Vieira Mde A, de Oliveira AT, Lisboa MV, de Andrade DA, et al. Melanoma characteristics in Brazil: demographics, treatment, and survival analysis. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:4.
Pozzobon F, Fierro E, Acosta Á, Carreñoc A. Características del melanoma cutáneo primario en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología 2006–2010. Revista Colombiana de Cancerología. 2013;17(3):111–8.
Zemelman V, Roa J, Tagle SR, Valenzuela CY. Malignant melanoma in Chile: an unusual distribution of primary sites in men from low socioeconomic strata. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2006;31(3):335–8.
Phan A, Touzet S, Dalle S, Ronger-Savle S, Balme B, Thomas L. Acral lentiginous melanoma: a clinicoprognostic study of 126 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155(3):561–9.
O’Leary JA, Berend KR, Johnson JL, Levin LS, Seigler HF. Subungual melanoma. A review of 93 cases with identification of prognostic variables. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;378:206–12.
Green A, McCredie M, MacKie R, Giles G, Young P, Morton C, et al. A case-control study of melanomas of the soles and palms (Australia and Scotland). Cancer Causes Control. 1999;10:21–5.
Egger ME, McMasters KM, Callender GG, Quillo AR, Martin RC 2nd, Stromberg AJ, et al. Unique prognostic factors in acral lentiginous melanoma. Am J Surg. 2012;204(6):874–9 (discussion 9–80).
Pollack LA, Li J, Berkowitz Z, Weir HK, Wu XC, Ajani UA, et al. Melanoma survival in the United States, 1992 to 2005. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(5 Suppl 1):S78–86.
Kuchelmeister C, Schaumburg-Lever G, Garbe C. Acral cutaneous melanoma in caucasians: clinical features, histopathology and prognosis in 112 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143(2):275–80.
Slingluff CL Jr, Vollmer R, Seigler HF. Acral melanoma: a review of 185 patients with identification of prognostic variables. J Surg Oncol. 1990;45(2):91–8.
Tan KB, Moncrieff M, Thompson JF, McCarthy SW, Shaw HM, Quinn MJ, et al. Subungual melanoma: a study of 124 cases highlighting features of early lesions, potential pitfalls in diagnosis, and guidelines for histologic reporting. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(12):1902–12.
Bello DM, Chou JF, Panageas KS, Brady MS, Coit DG, Carvajal RD, et al. Prognosis of acral melanoma: a series of 281 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(11):3618–25.
Krauthammer M, Kong Y, Ha BH, Evans P, Bacchiocchi A, McCusker JP, et al. Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic RAC1 mutations in melanoma. Nat Genet. 2012;44(9):1006–14.
Curtin JA, Fridlyand J, Kageshita T, Patel HN, Busam KJ, Kutzner H, et al. Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(20):2135–47.
Furney SJ, Turajlic S, Fenwick K, Lambros MB, MacKay A, Ricken G, et al. Genomic characterisation of acral melanoma cell lines. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2012;25(4):488–92.
Curtin JA, Busam K, Pinkel D, Bastian BC. Somatic activation of KIT in distinct subtypes of melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(26):4340–6.
Turajlic S, Furney SJ, Lambros MB, Mitsopoulos C, Kozarewa I, Geyer FC, et al. Whole genome sequencing of matched primary and metastatic acral melanomas. Genome Res. 2012;22(2):196–207.
McGovern VJ, Shaw HM, Milton GW. Prognosis in patients with thin malignant melanoma: influence of regression. Histopathology. 1983;7(5):673–80.
Clemente CG, Mihm MC Jr, Bufalino R, Zurrida S, Collini P, Cascinelli N. Prognostic value of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in the vertical growth phase of primary cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 1996;77(7):1303–10.
Tuthill RJ, Unger JM, Liu PY, Flaherty LE, Sondak VK, Southwest Oncology G. Risk assessment in localized primary cutaneous melanoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study evaluating nine factors and a test of the Clark logistic regression prediction model. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;118(4):504–11.
van Houdt IS, Sluijter BJ, Moesbergen LM, Vos WM, de Gruijl TD, Molenkamp BG, et al. Favorable outcome in clinically stage II melanoma patients is associated with the presence of activated tumor infiltrating T-lymphocytes and preserved MHC class I antigen expression. Int J Cancer. 2008;123(3):609–15.
Mihm MC Jr, Clemente CG, Cascinelli N. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in lymph node melanoma metastases: a histopathologic prognostic indicator and an expression of local immune response. Lab Invest. 1996;74(1):43–7.
Hillen F, Baeten CI, van de Winkel A, Creytens D, van der Schaft DW, Winnepenninckx V, et al. Leukocyte infiltration and tumor cell plasticity are parameters of aggressiveness in primary cutaneous melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2008;57(1):97–106.
Mandala M, Imberti GL, Piazzalunga D, Belfiglio M, Labianca R, Barberis M, et al. Clinical and histopathological risk factors to predict sentinel lymph node positivity, disease-free and overall survival in clinical stages I–II AJCC skin melanoma: outcome analysis from a single-institution prospectively collected database. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(14):2537–45.
Bogunovic D, O’Neill DW, Belitskaya-Levy I, Vacic V, Yu YL, Adams S, et al. Immune profile and mitotic index of metastatic melanoma lesions enhance clinical staging in predicting patient survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(48):20429–34.
Burton AL, Roach BA, Mays MP, Chen AF, Ginter BA, Vierling AM, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in melanoma. Am Surg. 2011;77(2):188–92.
Azimi F, Scolyer RA, Rumcheva P, Moncrieff M, Murali R, McCarthy SW, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte grade is an independent predictor of sentinel lymph node status and survival in patients with cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(21):2678–83.
Taylor RC, Patel A, Panageas KS, Busam KJ, Brady MS. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict sentinel lymph node positivity in patients with cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(7):869–75.
Gimotty PA, Van Belle P, Elder DE, Murry T, Montone KT, Xu X, et al. Biologic and prognostic significance of dermal Ki67 expression, mitoses, and tumorigenicity in thin invasive cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(31):8048–56.
Barnhill RL, Fine JA, Roush GC, Berwick M. Predicting five-year outcome for patients with cutaneous melanoma in a population-based study. Cancer. 1996;78(3):427–32.
Wong SL, Kattan MW, McMasters KM, Coit DG. A nomogram that predicts the presence of sentinel node metastasis in melanoma with better discrimination than the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(4):282–8.
Pasquali S, Mocellin S, Campana L, Vecchiato A, Bonandini E, Montesco M, et al. Maximizing the clinical usefulness of a nomogram to select patients candidate to sentinel node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(8):675–80.
Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, Thompson JF, Atkins MB, Byrd DR, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(36):6199–206.
Cockburn MG, Zadnick J, Deapen D. Developing epidemic of melanoma in the Hispanic population of California. Cancer. 2006;106(5):1162–8.
Lv J, Dai B, Kong Y, Shen X, Kong J. Acral melanoma in Chinese: a clinicopathological and prognostic study of 142 cases. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31432.
Gershenwald JE, Mansfield PF, Lee JE, Ross MI. Role for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thick (≥4 mm) primary melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7(2):160–5.
Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, Mozzillo N, Elashoff R, Essner R, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(13):1307–17.
Yee VS, Thompson JF, McKinnon JG, Scolyer RA, Li LX, McCarthy WH, et al. Outcome in 846 cutaneous melanoma patients from a single center after a negative sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(6):429–39.
Scolyer RA, Thompson JF, Stretch JR, Sharma R, McCarthy SW. Pathology of melanocytic lesions: new, controversial, and clinically important issues. J Surg Oncol. 2004;86(4):200–11.
Rex J, Paradelo C, Mangas C, Hilari JM, Fernandez-Figueras MT, Ferrandiz C. Management of primary cutaneous melanoma of the hands and feet: a clinicoprognostic study. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35(10):1505–13.
Moehrle M, Metzger S, Schippert W, Garbe C, Rassner G, Breuninger H. “Functional” surgery in subungual melanoma. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(4):366–74.
Barnes BC, Seigler HF, Saxby TS, Kocher MS, Harrelson JM. Melanoma of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(6):892–8.
Durbec F, Martin L, Derancourt C, Grange F. Melanoma of the hand and foot: epidemiological, prognostic and genetic features. A systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(4):727–39.
Heaton KM, Naggar A, Ensign LG, Ross MI, Balch CM. Surgical management and prognostic factors in patients with subungual melanoma. Ann Surg. 1994;219(2):197–204.
Torres-Cabala CA, Wang WL, Trent J, Yang D, Chen S, Galbincea J, et al. Correlation between KIT expression and KIT mutation in melanoma: a study of 173 cases with emphasis on the acral-lentiginous/mucosal type. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(11):1446–56.
Paolino G, Bekkenk M, Didona D, Eibenschutz L, Richetta A, Cantisani C, et al. Is the prognosis and course of acral melanoma related to site-specific clinicopathological features? Age. 2016;61(129):62.
Paolino G, Panetta C, Cota C, Didona D, Moliterni E, Di Mattia C, et al. Vitamin D receptor immunohistochemistry variability in sun-exposed and non-sun-exposed melanomas. Melanoma Res. 2017;27(1):17–23.
Johnson DB, Peng C, Abramson RG, Wolchok JD, Sosman JA, Carvajal RD, Ariyan CE. Ipilimumab in acral melanoma: A retrospective review. ASCO Annual Meeting Abstracts. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(15_suppl) (May 20 Supplement), Abstract 9056.
Larkin J, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(13):1270–1.
Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2521–32.
Day CL Jr, Sober AJ, Kopf AW, Lew RA, Mihm MC Jr, Golomb FM, et al. A prognostic model for clinical stage I melanoma of the trunk. Location near the midline is not an independent risk factor for recurrent disease. Am J Surg. 1981;142(2):247–51.
Clark WH Jr, Elder DE, Dt Guerry, Braitman LE, Trock BJ, Schultz D, et al. Model predicting survival in stage I melanoma based on tumor progression. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81(24):1893–904.
Daud AI, Wolchok JD, Robert C, Hwu WJ, Weber JS, Ribas A, et al. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression and response to the anti-programmed death 1 antibody pembrolizumab in melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(34):4102–9.
Carbognin L, Pilotto S, Milella M, Vaccaro V, Brunelli M, Calio A, et al. Differential activity of nivolumab, pembrolizumab and MPDL3280A according to the tumor expression of programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1): sensitivity analysis of trials in melanoma, lung and genitourinary cancers. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0130142.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CAC, SC and CTC contributed to the conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and interpretation; CAC, SC and MC performed data acquisition, as well as providing administrative, technical, and material support; all authors drafted the article and made critical revisions related to the intellectual content of the manuscript, and approved the final version of the article to be published.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Institutional Review Board of INEN approved the conduct of this survey (#047-2015-CRP-DI-DICON/INEN), and all written informed consent was obtained from patients.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castaneda, C.A., Torres-Cabala, C., Castillo, M. et al. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in acral lentiginous melanoma: a study of a large cohort of cases from Latin America. Clin Transl Oncol 19, 1478–1488 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1685-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1685-3